Reasons for infertile couples to discontinue in vitro fertilisation (IVF) treatment

Factors associated with discontinuation in fertility treatment: a systematic scoping review

PURPOSE

The discontinuation of fertility treatment could decrease the chances of achieving parenthood for infertile patients and often leads to economic loss and medical resource waste. However, the evidence on the factors associated with discontinuation is unclear and inconsistent in the context of fertility treatment. This scoping review aimed to summarize the evidence on factors associated with discontinuation in fertility treatment, identify the current knowledge gap, and generate recommendations for future research.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CINAHL, American Psychological Association, and http://clinicaltrials.gov from inception to June 2023 without language or time restrictions. We also searched the grey literature in Open Grey and Google Scholar and hand-searched the reference lists of relevant studies to identify potentially eligible studies. Publications that studied factors associated with discontinuation in fertility treatment were included. The identified factors were mapped to the World Health Organization's treatment adherence model.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven articles involving 41,973 infertile patients from 13 countries were included in this scoping review. All studies identified the factors from the perspective of patients, except for one that described the factors from the healthcare providers' perspective. A total of 42 factors were identified, with most of them belonging to the patient-related dimension, followed by socio-economic-related, treatment-related, condition-related, and healthcare system-related dimensions. Female education level, social support, and insurance coverage decreased the likelihood of treatment discontinuation, whereas multiparous women, male infertility, depression, higher infertility duration, and treatment duration increased the likelihood of treatment discontinuation. Age, education level, and ethnicity are the commonly nonmodifiable factors for treatment discontinuation, while insurance coverage, depression, and anxiety symptoms are among some of the more commonly reported modifiable factors.

CONCLUSION

This is the first scoping review examining and synthesizing evidence on the factors influencing of discontinuation in fertility treatment. This review could inform researchers, clinicians, and policymakers to address modifiable barriers and facilitators to develop personalized and multicomponent interventions that could improve the discontinuation in fertility treatment.

Effects of Self-Esteem on the Associations Between Infertility-Related Stress and Psychological Distress Among Infertile Chinese Women: A Cross-Sectional Study

Background

Anxiety and depression are the most common psychological causes of distress in infertile women. Our study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of depression and anxiety and investigate the effects of self-esteem on the association of infertility-related stress with depression and anxiety among infertile women.

Methods

This study was conducted between December 2017 and May 2018. Questionnaires containing Fertility Problem Inventory (FPI), Rosenberg self-esteem scale (RSES) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) were distributed among 536 female infertility patients in Shenyang, China. Hierarchical linear regression analyses were used to examine the mediating and moderating role of self-esteem. Baron and Kenny’s technique, asymptotic, and resampling strategies were used to confirm the mediating role of self-esteem on the associations between infertility-related stress with depression and anxiety.

Results

The prevalence of depression and anxiety was 27.9% and 42.2% among Chinese female infertility patients, respectively. Infertility-related stress was positively associated with depression and anxiety, whereas self-esteem was negatively associated with depression and anxiety. Additionally, the effects of infertility-related stress on depression and anxiety gradually decreased along with an increase in self-esteem. Meanwhile, self-esteem partially mediated the associations between infertility-related stress with depression and anxiety.

Conclusion

A high prevalence of psychological distress was found among infertile women. Self-esteem mediated and moderated the effects of infertility-related stress on depression and anxiety. Additionally, infertility-related stress and self-esteem were associated with psychological distress, which explained why infertile women had a higher prevalence of depression and anxiety. Therefore, interventions that focus on self-esteem may be effective and should be used as a resource to combat mental health problems.

The power of potential: Assisted reproduction and the counterstories of women who discontinue fertility treatment

Despite their low and inconsistent rates of success, assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) are presented by fertility clinics and constructed in media and popular culture as an effective treatment for infertility. The ways in which such technologies medicalize women's health and bodies have been well documented by social scientists and feminist health researchers. However, little is known about the struggles women face in cases of "failure"; that is, when ART does not achieve its purported potential to assist women in their attempts to conceive and have the desired outcomes of conception and birth. Using a post-structural feminist interpretive framework combined with a narrative methodology, this paper critically examines the ways in which social and cultural narratives about gender and biotechnology shape women's accounts of discontinuing ART. Thirty-six interviews were conducted with twenty-two women across Canada who were at various stages of discontinuation and who utilized a variety of treatment types. Three inter-related narrative themes were developed to categorize the stories of struggle: (i) a growing desperation to be pregnant; (ii) confronting paternalistic medical expectations; and (iii) internalizing and resisting blame for treatment failures. These themes highlight both the explicit and subtle ways in which restrictive social and cultural narratives about womanhood and motherhood were perpetuated in clinical interactions, which ultimately made ending treatment more difficult. Our analysis illustrates how women navigated and resisted such narratives, through pausing or ending treatment despite provider recommendations and clinical messages. We suggest that fertility providers critically reflect on the potentially harmful language used during interactions with patients and recommend that discontinuation discussions become a recurring, normalized component of treatment protocols and patient-provider conversations so that women feel better supported to end treatment when they believe it is financially, emotionally, and physically beneficial for them to do so.

Patient willingness, preferences and decision-making about planning for three complete cycles of IVF/ICSI treatment

STUDY QUESTION

What is willingness, preference and decision-making about planning for the possibility of needing multiple cycles of IVF/ICSI treatment among patients consulting for a first or repeat stimulated IVF/ICSI cycle?

SUMMARY ANSWER

The majority of patients seem to value the opportunity to plan for multiple cycles of treatment while acknowledging both possible challenges and benefits of doing so and decisions that might need to be made in advance.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Patients have strong intentions to do treatment to achieve pregnancy and approximately 48-54% continue treatment when confronted with a failed cycle, undergoing at least three complete cycles of treatment. However, there is inconsistency between this apparent willingness to do multiple cycles of treatment and the way treatment is currently planned on a cycle-by-cycle basis with patients.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

The study was of cross-sectional design, comprising a mixed-methods English online survey posted between November 2019 and March 2020. Eligibility criteria were being a patient who had had a consultation to start a stimulated cycle of IVF/ICSI for the first time or for a repeat stimulated cycle after an unsuccessful cycle in the eight weeks prior to survey completion. Individuals were also required to be aged 18 or older (upper age limit of 42 years for women) and able to respond in English. In total 881 clicked on the survey link, 118 did not consent, 41 were excluded after data screening, 57 did not meet the inclusion criteria, 331 started the survey but did not complete it, 28 had missing data on critical variables (e.g., age) and 306 completed the survey (40.1% completion, 57 men, 249 women).

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Participants were allocated to either the willing or unwilling to plan for multiple cycles of treatment group based on their responses to three variables: willingness to plan for three complete cycles, whether they would choose to have another cycle of IVF and whether they would continue treatment after an unsuccessful cycle. Quantitative questions gathered data on preferences towards planning for multiple cycles (i.e., attitudes, subjective norms and perceived behavioural control), challenges, benefits of planning for multiple cycles, decisional conflict experienced and treatment decisions involved in planning for multiple cycles. Demographic, fertility and fertility treatment information were also collected. Qualitative questions gathered textual data on other perceived benefits and challenges of planning for multiple cycles and solutions to the challenges. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used on quantitative data. Thematic analysis (inductive coding) was performed on the textual data.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Overall, 73.2% (n = 224) of participants had had a consultation to start a first cycle of IVF/ICSI. Participants were on average 33 years of age and had been trying to conceive for three years. A total of 63.07% (n = 193) were university educated. A total of 56% (n = 172) of participants were willing to plan for multiple cycles of IVF/ICSI in advance of treatment. Repeated measures ANOVA, t-tests and chi-square analysis showed the willing group to be significantly more likely to have been in a relationship for longer (p<.05), have higher education (p<.05) and be resident in the United Kingdom (p<.05). The willing group had positive attitudes towards planning for multiple cycles (p<.001) and stronger agreement with subjective norms (p<.001), perceived behavioural control (p<.001), benefits of planning for multiple cycles (p<.01) and felt able and attached more importance to making treatment decisions in advance of treatment (p<.05). Data saturation was achieved for the thematic analysis of textual data which revealed a total of four other challenges (e.g., less decisional freedom) and six other benefits (e.g., having a realistic view of treatment) to planning for multiple cycles. Qualitative analysis also revealed that most patients could anticipate and provide solutions for the nine challenges of planning for multiple cycles (e.g., using flexible working for the negative effect of treatment on work).

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

Limitations included the outcome measure being willingness to plan for multiple cycles rather than actual multi-cycle planning behaviour. The unwilling group represented a heterogeneous group with possibly unknown motivational coherence (e.g., definitely against planning, ambivalent about planning). Other limitations included the cross-sectional nature of the survey and the recruitment source.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Treatment consultations about undergoing fertility treatment could re-frame treatment to be a multi-cycle process in line with patient's willingness, preference and decision-making. This multi-cycle approach could empower patients and clinicians to discuss treatment expectations realistically and formulate fully informed treatment plans that take account of the high likelihood of cycle failure in addition to the treatment decisions that may need to be made during treatment when a cycle fails. This multi-cycle approach could help us support patients in adhering to their treatment plans even when faced with challenges, and help ascertain the level of treatment engagement possible to achieve parenthood goals.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

This project is funded by an Investigator-Sponsor Non-interventional Study from Merck Serono Ltd (MS200059_0010). Professor Boivin reports personal fees from Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, Merck AB an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt Germany, Theramex, Ferring Pharmaceuticals A/S, grant from Merck Serono Ltd, outside the submitted work and that she is co-developer of Fertility Quality of Life (FertiQoL) and MediEmo app. Dr. Gameiro reports consultancy fees from Ferring Pharmaceuticals A/S, Access Fertility and SONA-Pharm LLC, and grants from Merck Serono Ltd. Dr. Harrison declares no conflicts of interest.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

n/a.

Anxiety and depression among infertile women: a cross-sectional survey from Hungary

Background

Infertility is often associated with a chronic state of stress which may manifest itself in anxiety-related and depressive symptoms. The aim of our study is to assess the psychological state of women with and without fertility problems, and to investigate the background factors of anxiety-related and depressive symptoms in women struggling with infertility.

Methods

Our study was conducted with the participation of 225 (134 primary infertile and 91 fertile) women, recruited in a clinical setting and online. We used the following questionnaires: Spielberger Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-T), Shortened Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and Fertility Problem Inventory (FPI). We also interviewed our subjects on the presence of other sources of stress (the quality of the relationship with their mother, financial and illness-related stress), and we described sociodemographic and fertility-specific characteristics. We tested our hypotheses using independent-samples t-tests (M ± SD) and multiple linear regression modelling (ß).

Results

Infertile women were younger (33.30 ± 4.85 vs. 35.74 ± 5.73, p = .001), but had significantly worse psychological well-being (BDI = 14.94 ± 12.90 vs. 8.95 ± 10.49, p < .0001; STAI-T = 48.76 ± 10.96 vs. 41.18 ± 11.26, p < .0001) than fertile subjects. Depressive symptoms and anxiety in infertile women were associated with age, social concern, sexual concern and maternal relationship stress. Trait anxiety was also associated with financial stress. Our model was able to account for 58% of the variance of depressive symptoms and 62% of the variance of trait anxiety.

Conclusions

Depressive and anxiety-related symptoms of infertile women are more prominent than those of fertile females. The measurement of these indicators and the mitigation of underlying distress by adequate psychosocial interventions should be encouraged.

How much is a child worth? Providers' and patients' views and responses concerning ethical and policy challenges in paying for ART

Infertility treatments remain expensive and in many countries are covered by little, if any, insurance, raising critical questions concerning how patients and providers view and make decisions regarding these challenges. In-depth semi-structured interviews of approximately 1 hour were conducted with 37 IVF providers and 10 patients (17 physicians, 10 other providers and 10 patients), and were systematically analyzed. These data suggest current insurance policies and legislation pose critical ethical and logistical challenges for both patients and providers. These individuals face multiple uncertainties about costs and insurance, related to unclear causes of fertility, treatment length, costs and outcomes, and odds that insurers will cover expenses. Insurers frequently decline to agree to reimbursement beforehand, and decide only afterwards, case-by-case, generating stress. Patients and providers thus may not be able to predict how best to allocate limited resources. Providers may advocate for patients, but are usually unsuccessful. Patients may adopt several strategies: e.g., moving/seeking treatment elsewhere, switching or feeling "stuck" in jobs because of insurance, seeking "free" medications, going into debt, or using funds intended for other purposes. Patients do not perceive and respond to resource limitations as fixed phenomena-i.e., patients do not see treatment simply as "affordable" or not. Rather, patients face quandaries of how much to keep spending-how much a child is worth-and are forced to make complex risk/benefit calculations. Couples can disagree, straining relationships. In sum, these data, the first to explore how providers and patients struggle, view, and make decisions regarding limited insurance and resources for infertility, raise several critical ethical and policy issues. These data suggest that individuals have difficulty translating profoundly life-altering, deeply personal quests for meaning and fulfillment into purely economic terms. These findings thus have important implications for future policy, practice, research, and patient and provider education.

Couples' discontinuation of fertility treatments: a longitudinal study on demographic, biomedical, and psychosocial risk factors

PURPOSE

This study aims to explore the role of infertility-psychosocial variables on treatment discontinuation after controlling for demographic and biomedical variables in couples seeking reimbursed fertility treatment.

METHODS

A prospective study was conducted in 139 couples seeking fertility treatment. Between February 2010 and March 2011, participants completed measures of anxiety (STAI-State), depression (BDI-II), infertility-stress (FPI), and infertility coping strategies (COMPI-CSS). Medical data related to diagnosis, treatment, and discontinuation were collected in December 2013. A multiple logistic regression was performed to identify the predictors of discontinuation.

RESULTS

The discontinuation rate was 29.5%. Female education level, engagement in ART procedures, and female causation decreased the likelihood of treatment discontinuation, whereas female age and depression increased the likelihood of discontinuation. Female depression was the strongest predictor in this model. The model correctly identified 75.5% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Female age and female depression are associated with a higher likelihood of treatment discontinuation in couples seeking treatment. Reproductive health professionals should therefore inform couples about the link between the fertility treatment discontinuation and both female age and female depression. Couples in which female partners present clinically relevant depression should be referred to a mental health professional to prevent premature abandonment of fertility treatments and thus increase success rates.

Why we should talk about compliance with assisted reproductive technologies (ART): a systematic review and meta-analysis of ART compliance rates

BACKGROUND

The goal of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to estimate the rate of compliance with assisted reproductive technologies (ART) and examine its relationship with treatment success rates.

METHODS

Six databases were systematically searched from 1978 to December 2011. Studies were included if they reported data on patient progression through three consecutive standard ART cycles. Compliance was estimated for the first three ART cycles (typical ART Regimen Compliance, TARC) and after the first and the second failed cycles (CAF1, CAF2). Treatment success rates for all patients who started ART and for those who fully complied with the three ART cycles were estimated.

RESULTS

Ten studies with data for 14 810 patients were included. TARC was 78.2% [95% confidence interval (CI) 68.8-85.3%], CAF1 was 81.8% (73.3-88.1%) and CAF2 was 75.3% (68.2-81.2%). The overall success rate was 42.7% (32.6-53.6%) for all patients starting ART and 57.9% (49.4-65.9%) for those who complied with three ART cycles. Compliance rates did not vary according to study quality, but TARC was higher for studies that reported data on doctor-censored patients versus those that did not (84.2% 95% CI 75.5-90.2 versus 70.6% 95% CI 58.3-80.5, P = 0.043). Analysis of funnel plots and the Egger test indicated publication bias for CAF1.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings from this meta-analysis should reassure clinics and patients that most patients are able to comply with three cycles of ART. Compliers could increase their chances of success by as much as 15%. A more detailed assessment of compliance requires monitoring long-term treatment trajectories through the creation of national registries.

Why do patients discontinue fertility treatment? A systematic review of reasons and predictors of discontinuation in fertility treatment

BACKGROUND

Chances of achieving parenthood are high for couples who undergo fertility treatment. However, many choose to discontinue before conceiving. A systematic review was conducted to investigate patients' stated reasons for and predictors of discontinuation at five fertility treatment stages.

METHODS

Six databases were systematically searched. Search-terms referred to fertility treatment and discontinuation. Studies reporting on patients' stated reasons for or predictors of treatment discontinuation were included. A list of all reasons for discontinuation presented in each study was made, different categories of reasons were defined and the percentage of selections of each category was calculated. For each predictor, it was noted how many studies investigated it and how many found a positive and/or negative association with discontinuation.

RESULTS

The review included 22 studies that sampled 21 453 patients from eight countries. The most selected reasons for discontinuation were: postponement of treatment (39.18%, postponement of treatment or unknown 19.17%), physical and psychological burden (19.07%, psychological burden 14%, physical burden 6.32%), relational and personal problems (16.67%, personal reasons 9.27%, relational problems 8.83%), treatment rejection (13.23%) and organizational (11.68%) and clinic (7.71%) problems. Some reasons were common across stages (e.g. psychological burden). Others were stage-specific (e.g. treatment rejection during workup). None of the predictors reported were consistently associated with discontinuation.

CONCLUSIONS

Much longitudinal and theory led research is required to explain discontinuation. Meanwhile, treatment burden should be addressed by better care organization and support for patients. Patients should be well informed, have the opportunity to discuss values and worries about treatment and receive advice to decide about continuing treatment.