201 consecutive cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) procedures in a single Asian tertiary centre

Oncological outcomes and hospitalization cost of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) open and closed abdomen techniques: Results from two French expert centers

BACKGROUND

Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) associated with CC0 excision is performed using either an open (OPEN_HIPEC) or closed abdominal technique (CLOSED_HIPEC). However, little data is available on the costs of this treatment, as there is no code for HIPEC in the French Classification of Medical Acts. Oncological outcomes and the mean cost of hospitalization were compared.

METHODS

Between 2017 and 2021, 144 patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (all etiologies) were included (OPEN_HIPEC, n = 70; CLOSED_HIPEC, n = 74) in this retrospective two-center study. Morbi-mortality, overall survival (OS), recurrence-free-survival (RFS) and mean cost of hospitalization were compared.

RESULTS

The median OS and RFS were 71.3 months [63-71.5] and 26.8 months [20-35.3] respectively, and were similar for both techniques; and after stratification by histology. Multivariate analysis adjusted on PCI score of OS identified mitomycin as a protective factor (HR = 0.31 [0.10-0.90], p = 0.032) and ASA score>2 (HR = 2.32 [1.32- 4.06], p = 0.003) and number of resection (HR = 1.21 [1.06-1.39], p = 0.006) as a risk factors of RFS. Complication rates at day 30 were similar between OPEN and CLOSED_HIPEC, 31 (44.3 %) vs 42 (56.8 %); p = 0.135. OPEN_HIPEC had more severe complications (11 (35.5 %) vs 6 (14.3 %); p = 0.034). The mean cost of hospitalization was estimated as €15,627 for OPEN_HIPEC and €14,211 for CLOSED_HIPEC for a mean length-of-stay of 12.7 and 16.7 days respectively. The mean amount received by the hospital per hospitalization was estimated at €16,399 and €15,536 respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

OS and RFS were similar for open and closed HIPEC. Severe complications at day 30 were more frequent in OPEN_HIPEC group. The amount received by hospital for both HIPEC techniques is sufficient.

Quality Standards for Surgery of Colorectal Peritoneal Metastasis After Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

The standardization of surgical outcomes throughout surgical procedures is mandatory. Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS + HIPEC) should provide proficient oncological and surgical outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

The aim of this study was to identify clinically relevant quality indicators and their quality standard, and to determine their acceptable quality limit. A systematic review on cytoreductive results from 2000 to 2018 was performed focusing on clinical guidelines, consensus conferences, and publications. After the selection of quality indicators, a systematic review of indexed references was performed in order to calculate the quality standard for each indicator.

STUDY SELECTION

Unicentric/multicentric series, comparative studies, and clinical trials. Studies were to include outcomes after cytoreduction of colorectal origin and series with more than 50 patients. Quality indicators with at least 10 series were mandatory and objective measurements were also mandatory for inclusion.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Quality indicators selected were 1- to 5-year survival, overall disease-free survival, 1- to 5-year disease-free survival, complete surgical resection, duration of surgery, length of stay, overall morbimortality, major morbidity, re-intervention, postoperative hemorrhage, intestinal fistula, anastomotic leakage, wound infection, postoperative medical complications, overall recurrence, and failure to rescue.

RESULTS

The most relevant quality indicators and critical quality limits were overall disease-free survival and 5-year overall disease-free survival (14 months and <10 months, and 14% and <4%, respectively), completeness of surgical resection (89% and <80%, respectively), overall mortality (3% and >8%, respectively), overall morbidity (47% and >63%, respectively), failure to rescue (12% and <30%, respectively), reintervention (13 and <22%, respectively), anastomotic leakage (6% and <13%, respectively), and overall recurrence (60% and <74%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

This is the first study to assess quality standards in CRS + HIPEC for colorectal peritoneal metastases. The current data are of particular relevance for future studies to control the variability of this surgery.

The addition of sodium thiosulphate to hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy with cisplatin in ovarian cancer

•

Cisplatin chemotherapy is highly nephrotoxic and is a dose limiting side effect.

•

The OVIHIPEC-1 trial employed sodium thiosulphate (ST) as a renal protectant.

•

We analyse the implementation of HIPEC for EOC in a peritoneal malignancy centre.

•

One acute kidney injury (AKI) event was noted when ST was not used with HIPEC.

•

No AKI was observed when sodium thiosulphate was used with cisplatin at 100 mg/m^2.

Cisplatin based hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has been shown to prolong recurrence free and overall survival of women with ovarian cancer who have responded to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of cytoreductive surgery with or without the addition of HIPEC on renal function.

Method

This is a retrospective case-controlled study at a tertiary teaching hospital in Dublin, Ireland. All patients who had interval cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and HIPEC from October 2017 to October 2020 were included. A cohort of patients who had interval CRS without HIPEC were included as a control. Sodium thiosulphate (ST) was added to the HIPEC protocol in 2019. In order to assess the impact of ST as a renal protectant, renal function and post-operative outcomes were compared between the groups.

Results

Sixty patients who had interval CRS were included, thirty of whom received cisplatin-based HIPEC. Seven received cisplatin 50 mg/m² without the addition of ST. Twenty three patients received cisplatin 100 mg/m² and ST. There were no statistically differences in age, body mass index BMI, American society of anaesthesia score, estimated blood loss or peritoneal cancer index between the cohorts (p > 0.05). The only episode of acute kidney injury (AKI) was within the HIPEC cohort, after cisplatin 50 mg/m² (without ST) and this was sustained at three months. In contrast, no patients within the CRS cohort or cisplatin 100 mg/m² that received the addition of ST, sustained a renal injury and all had a creatinine within the normal range at three days post operatively.

Conclusion

The renal toxicity associated with cisplatin HIPEC and major abdominal surgery can be minimised with careful preoperative optimisation, intra operative fluid management and attention to renal function. The addition of sodium thiosulphate is a safe and effective method to minimise toxicity and should be added to any cisplatin HIPEC protocol.

The Synergistic Effect of Hyperthermia and Chemotherapy in Magnetite Nanomedicine-Based Lung Cancer Treatment

Background

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer patient death in the world. There are many treatment options for lung cancer, including surgery, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and combined therapy. Despite significant progress has been made in the diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer during the past few decades, the prognosis is still unsatisfactory.

Purpose

To resolve the problem of chemotherapy failure, we developed a magnetite-based nanomedicine for chemotherapy acting synergistically with loco-regional hyperthermia.

Methods

The targeting carrier consisted of a complex of superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) and poly(sodium styrene sulfonate) (PSS) at the core and a layer-by-layer shell with cisplatin (CDDP), together with methotrexate – human serum albumin conjugate (MTX−HSA conjugate) for lung cancer-specific targeting, referred to hereafter as SPIO@PSS/CDDP/HSA−MTX nanoparticles (NPs).

Results

SPIO@PSS/CDDP/HSA−MTX NPs had good biocompatibility and stability in physiological solutions. Furthermore, SPIO@PSS/CDDP/HSA−MTX NPs exhibited a higher temperature increase rate than SPIO nanoparticles under irradiation by a radiofrequency (RF) generator. Therefore, SPIO@PSS/CDDP/HSA−MTX NPs could be used as a hyperthermia inducer under RF exposure after nanoparticles preferentially targeted and then accumulated at tumor sites. In addition, SPIO@PSS/CDDP/HSA−MTX NPs were developed to be used during combined chemotherapy and hyperthermia therapy, exhibiting a synergistic anticancer effect better than the effect of monotherapy.

Conclusion

Both in vitro and in vivo results suggest that the designed SPIO@PSS/CDDP/HSA−MTX NPs are a powerful candidate nanoplatform for future antitumor treatment strategies.

Magnetic nanomedicine for CD133-expressing cancer therapy using locoregional hyperthermia combined with chemotherapy

Aim: Cells with CD133 overexpression, a theoretical cancer stem cells (CSCs) marker, have been shown to induce colorectal cancer (CRC) initiation and relapse. Therefore, the detection and treatment of CSCs are the most important factors in overcoming CRC. Materials & methods: Herein, we developed a magnetite-based nanomedicine (superparamagnetic iron oxide@poly(sodium styrene sulfonate)/irinotecan/human serum albumin-anti-CD133 nanoparticle) using loco-regional hyperthermia combined with chemotherapy for CRC- and CSC-specific targeting treatment. Results: The designed nanoparticles were highly biocompatible and exhibited a higher temperature increase rate under radiofrequency generator irradiation. The nanoparticles could be used as a T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging contrast media, and also applied during hyperthermia and chemotherapy to display a synergistic anticancer effect. Conclusion: Therefore, the superparamagnetic iron oxide@poly(sodium styrene sulfonate)/irinotecan/human serum albumin-anti-CD133 nanoparticles are a powerful candidate for future antitumor strategies.

Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for colorectal and appendiceal peritoneal metastases - The Hong Kong experience and literature review

INTRODUCTION

Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is increasingly used to treat peritoneal metastases from appendiceal or colorectal origin. We evaluate our institution's experience and survival outcomes with this procedure, and its efficacy in symptom relief.

METHODS

This is a single-centre retrospective observational study on patients with peritoneal metastases (PM) from appendiceal neoplasm or colorectal cancer who underwent CRS/HIPEC in Queen Mary Hospital. Our primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and morbidity and mortality of this procedure; secondary endpoints included disease-free survival (DFS) and symptom-free survival.

RESULTS

Between 2006 and 2018, thirty CRS/HIPEC procedures were performed for 28 patients - 17 (60.7%) had appendiceal PM while 11 (39.9%) had colorectal PM. The median peritoneal cancer index was 20; complete cytoreduction was achieved in 83.3% patients. High-grade morbidity occurred in 13.3% cases. There was no 30-day mortality. Two-year OS were 71.6% and 50% for low-grade appendiceal PM and colorectal PM patients (p = 0.20). Complete cytoreduction improved OS (2-year OS 75.4% vs 20%, p = 0.04). Median DFS was 11.8 months. Median symptom-free duration was 36.8 months; patients with complete cytoreduction were more likely to remain asymptomatic (82.9% at 1 year, vs 60% in incomplete cytoreduction group, p < 0.01). 91.7% low-grade appendiceal PM patients and 58.4% colorectal PM patients remained asymptomatic at post-operative one year (p = 0.31).

CONCLUSION

CRS/HIPEC is beneficial to appendiceal PM and selected colorectal PM patients - improving survival and offering prolonged symptom relief, with reasonable morbidity and mortality. Complete cytoreduction is key to realising this benefit.

High-grade complication is associated with poor overall survival after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is increasingly used in peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) management. This modality is criticized for its high morbidity and mortality. We evaluate the morbidity and mortality of patients undergoing this procedure in our institution.

METHODS

A review of our institution's database was performed. All patients who underwent CRS/HIPEC between July 2011 and March 2018 were divided into three groups: no, low-grade, and high-grade complications. Prognostic factors were determined with Cox regression, while morbidity risk factors were analyzed using multinomial logistic regression.

RESULTS

225 consecutive patients underwent CRS/HIPEC. The most common primary cancer types were colorectal (35.1%), appendiceal (25.8%), and ovarian (22.2%). Median age was 55 years old (range 14-77), and patients were typically female (68.0%). 38.7% developed low-grade complications and 14.7% had high-grade complications. No 30-day mortality was observed. Different tumor origins are associated with significant differences in overall survival (p < 0.001). Patients without complications had significantly better survival than those with high-grade complications (HR 0.35, 95% CI 0.15-0.81, p < 0.001). Males were more likely to develop low-grade complications (OR 3.30, 95% CI 1.31-8.30, p = 0.011). Intra-operative blood loss was associated with greater odds of developing any post-operative complications (OR 1.001, 95% CI 1.0003-1.002, p = 0.007; and OR 1.002, 95% CI 1.001-1.002, p < 0.001, for low and high grade, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Presence of high-grade complication was associated with poorer survival in patients after CRS/HIPEC. Pre-operative careful assessment of patients is pivotal to ensure favorable patient outcome following this complex procedure.

[A Meta-Analysis of Efficacy and Adverse Effects of Lobaplatin and Cisplatin in the Treatment of Malignant Pleural Effusion]

背景与目的

系统评价洛铂（Lobaplatin, LBP）和顺铂（Cisplatin, DDP）胸腔灌注化疗治疗恶性胸腔积液（malignant pleural effusion, MPE）的疗效和不良反应。

方法

计算机检索Medline（PubMed）Embase、Web of Science、Cochrane、万方数据库、中国期刊全文数据库（CNKI）和维普数据库（VIP），收集有关LBP与DDP胸腔灌注化疗治疗MPE的随机对照试验（randomized control trial, RCT）；主要结局指标包括客观缓解率（objective response rate, ORR）、完全缓解率（complete response, CR）、部分缓解率（partial response, PR）、肾毒性、胸痛、胃肠道反应、骨髓抑制、发热反应及肝毒性；采用相对危险度（relative risk, RR）为效应量，各效应量以95%置信区间（95%CI）表示，Stata 14.0统计软件进行meta分析。

结果

共纳入12项RCT，共720例MPE患者，meta分析结果显示，与DDP胸腔灌注化疗方案比较，LBP胸腔灌注化疗方案明显提高MPE患者的ORR（RR=1.27, 95%CI: 1.15-1.40, P<0.001）、CR（RR=1.39, 95%CI: 1.09-1.78, P=0.007）、PR（RR=1.21, 95%CI: 1.02-1.42, P=0.026）；与DDP胸腔灌注化疗比较，LBP胸腔灌注化疗组的肾毒性（RR=0.31, 95%CI: 0.13-0.71, P=0.005）、胃肠道反应（RR=0.44, 95%CI: 0.31-0.62, P < 0.001）发生率显著低于DDP。

结论

与DDP胸腔灌注化疗治疗MPE比较，LBP胸腔灌注化疗治疗MPE的ORR、CR和PR均显著优于DDP，且肾毒性及胃肠道反应均显著低于DDP。

Peritoneal Surface Oncology in Singapore

Peritoneal surface malignancy is now an established indication for cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. The landscape of treatment in Singapore has evolved through the years, with expanded indications as the experience in the management of this disease improves.

Systematic Review of Variations in Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) for Peritoneal Metastasis from Colorectal Cancer

Background: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS), followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), combines radical surgery with abdominal heated chemotherapy, constituting a multimodal treatment approach. Since clear standards for HIPEC conduct in colorectal carcinoma (CRC) are lacking, we aimed to provide a comprehensive structured survey. Data sources and study eligibility criteria: A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, with keywords “HIPEC” and “colorectal cancer”, according to established guidelines. Articles were systematically screened, selecting 87 publications complemented by 48 publications identified through extended search for subsequent synthesis and evaluation, extracting inter alia details on used drugs, dosage, temperature, exposure times, and carrier solutions. Results: Compiled publications contained 171 reports on HIPEC conduct foremost with mitomycin C and oxaliplatin, but also other drugs and drug combinations, comprising at least 60 different procedures. We hence provide an overview of interconnections between HIPEC protocols, used drugs and carrier solutions as well as their volumes. In addition, HIPEC temperatures and dosing benchmarks, as well as an estimate of in vivo resulting drug concentrations are demonstrated. Conclusions and implications: Owing to recent developments, HIPEC conduct and practices need to be reassessed. Unfortunately, imprecise and lacking reporting is frequent, which is why minimal information requirements should be established for HIPEC and the introduction of final drug concentrations for comparability reasons seems sensible.

Predictive value of peritoneal cancer index for survival in patients with mucinous peritoneal malignancies treated with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: a single centre experience

OBJECTIVES

This study investigated the correlation between the peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) and patient outcome depending on the tumour type.

BACKGROUND

Peritoneal surface malignancy (PSM) treatment depends on tumour type. Mucinous PSM (m-PSM) is associated with a better prognosis than non-mucinous PSM (nm-PSM). The PCI's predictive ability has not yet been evaluated.

METHODS

We analysed 123 patients with PSM treated with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) between 2008 and 2015. The m-PSM group (n = 75) included patients with appendiceal cancer (n = 15), colorectal cancer (n = 21), or low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (n = 39); the nm-PSM group (n = 48) included patients with gastric (n = 18) or colorectal (n = 30) cancer. The PCI's predictive ability was evaluated by multiple Cox-proportional hazard regression analysis and Kaplan-Meier curves.

RESULTS

The 5-year survival and PCI were higher in m-PSM patients (67.0%; 20.5 ± 12.1) than in nm-PSM patients (32.6%; p = 0.013; 8.9 ± 6.0; p < 0.001). Colorectal nm-PSM patients with PCI ≥16 had a worse 2-year survival (25.0%) vs. patients with PCI <16 (79.1%; log rank = 0.009), but no significant effect was observed in patients with m-PSM (66.7% vs. 68.1%; p = 0.935). Underlying disease (HR 5.666-16.240), BMI (HR 1.109), and PCI (HR 1.068) significantly influenced overall survival in all patients.

CONCLUSIONS

PCI is prognostic in nm-PSM, but not in m-PSM. CRS and HIPEC may benefit not only patients with low PCI, but also those with high PCI and m-PSM.

Therapeutical effect of intrapleural perfusion with hyperthermic chemotherapy on malignant pleural effusion under video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery

BACKGROUND

Patients with malignant pleural effusions (MPEs) have limited life expectancy. This study aims to investigate the feasibility of intrapleural perfusion with hyperthermic chemotherapy (IPHC) under video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery on MPE patients.

METHODS

MPE patients were enrolled in the study and treated with IPHC. The treatment response was classified as complete response (CR, no re-accumulation of pleural fluid for 4 weeks), partial response (PR, re-accumulation above the post-IPHC level but below the pre-IPHC level for four weeks), no response (NR; re-accumulation or above the pre-IPHC level). The change of Karnofsky performance score (KPS) and tumour markers were also recorded. Follow-up was done every two weeks during first month and monthly thereafter until death.

RESULTS

Eighty patients included 46 males and 34 females were included in the study. The total response rate was 100%, with 71.3% of CR and 28.7% of PR. The KPS scores were significantly elevated and the level of tumour markers in pleural effusion were dramatically decreased after IPHC. The median survival was 16.8 months ranged from 2.1 to 67.4 months. One-year and two-year survival rates were 82.5% and 23.8%, respectively. There were no serious clinical compilations during IPHC treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

IPHC is a safety, effective and promising approach for MPE patients. It provides well survival benefit and minor toxicities.