Long-term outcome of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation in recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation

A novel nomogram for prediction of intrahepatic recurrence-free survival in patients with HCC followed by radiofrequency ablation

OBJECTIVE

Although radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has been considered as the favourable treatment option for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), there still exist some challenges for new recurrence after RFA. The present study aims to determine the factors affecting recurrence and develop an effective model to predict intrahepatic recurrence-free survival (RFS).

METHODS

Patients with HCC followed by RFA between 2000 and 2021 were included in this study. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to determine the independent prognostic factors and establish the nomogram predicting intrahepatic RFS after RFA. The predictive performance of the nomogram was assessed according to the C-index, calibration plots, and Kaplan-Meier curves stratified by the tertiles.

RESULTS

A total of 801 sessions in 660 patients (including 1155 lesions) were enrolled into this study. Intrahepatic new recurrence was observed in all patients during the follow-up, and the mean intrahepatic RFS was 21.9 months in the present cohort. According to multivariate COX regression analysis, five independent prognostic factors affecting intrahepatic RFS were determined, including age, Child-Pugh class, tumour distribution, number of tumours, and a-fetoprotein (AFP). Based on all independent prognostic factors, the nomogram model was developed and evaluated, which achieved favourable discrimination and calibration.

CONCLUSION

This study established five independent prognostic factors and constructed a nomogram model to predict intrahepatic RFS for HCC patients followed by RFA. It could better help clinicians select RFA candidates, as well as offering the important information about whether patients need receive comprehensive treatment to prevent new recurrence after RFA.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

(1) In this study, 5 preoperative clinic-pathological variables were determined as the independent prognostic factors affecting RFS after RFA in the current largest sample size. (2) Based on these independent prognostic factors, a prognostic nomogram predicting RFS after RFA was established, which may be used to select patients who benefit from RFA and could help both surgeons and patients provide useful information for choosing the personalized treatment.

Radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this article is to discuss the use, comparative efficacy, and research progress of radiofrequency ablation (RFA), alone or in combination with other therapies, for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHOD

To search and summarize the basic and clinical studies of RFA in recent years.

RESULTS

RFA is one of the radical treatment methods listed in the guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of HCC. It has the characteristics of being minimally invasive and safe and can obtain good local tumor control, and it can improve the local immune ability, improve the tumor microenvironment and enhance the efficacy of chemotherapy drugs. It is commonly used for HCC treatment before liver transplantation and combined ALPPS and hepatectomy for HCC. In addition, the technology of RFA is constantly developing. The birth of noninvasive, no-touch RFA technology and equipment and the precise RFA concept have improved the therapeutic effect of RFA.

CONCLUSION

RFA has good local tumor control ability, is minimally invasive, is safe and has other beneficial characteristics. It plays an increasingly important role in the comprehensive treatment strategy of HCC. Whether RFA alone or combined with other technologies expands the surgical indications of patients with HCC and provides more benefits for HCC patients needs to be determined.

Predictors of post-recurrence survival in hepatocellular carcinoma patients following liver transplantation: Systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Data on predictors of post-recurrence survival (PRS) of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after liver transplantation (LT) have not been reviewed and analysed systematically. We aimed to systematically analyse all published data on the predictors for PRS.

METHODS

In accordance with PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines, online search of PubMed and EMBASE databases was done for all reports that evaluate the predictors of PRS based on multivariate analyses. Cumulative analyses of hazard ratios (HRs) and their corresponding 95% CIs were conducted to assess the potential predictors of PRS.

RESULTS

Twenty-three studies met the inclusion criteria. Among the 11,868 patients involved, 1921 (16%) had HCC recurrence within a median time of 16 months. The following were recurrence and tumour-related predictors: time to recurrence (<1 year; HR: 1.97; p < 0.001), AFP level at recurrence(≥100 ng/ml; HR: 1.82; p < 0.001), multiple recurrence (HR: 1.22; p < 0.001), bone recurrence (HR: 2.10; p < 0.001), poor differentiation (HR: 1.52; p < 0.001), intrahepatic recurrence (HR: 0.91; p = 0.03), extrahepatic recurrence (HR: 1.87; p < 0.001), Milan criteria at LT (HR: 1.34; p < 0.001), microvascular invasion (HR: 1.59; p < 0.001), multiorgan recurrence (HR: 1.28; p < 0.001), and recurrent HCV infection (HR: 1.21; p < 0.001). The treatment-related predictors were as follows: surgical resection (HR: 0.33; p < 0.001), mTOR inhibitors (HR: 0.63; p < 0.001), sorafenib (HR: 1.00; p = 0.01), palliative treatment (HR: 3.07; p < 0.001), RFA (HR: 0.47; p < 0.001), and radiotherapy (HR: 1.19; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Systematic evaluation of these predictors could guide surgeons to design risk-adapted algorithms for the management of post-LT HCC recurrence to construct reliable predictive models and to design future prospective studies or clinical trials.

Safety margin for CT- and US-guided radiofrequency ablation after TACE of HCC in the hepatic dome

INTRODUCTION

We evaluated the safety margin in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the hepatic dome who underwent computed tomography (CT)- or ultrasound (US)-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Included in this single-center study were 46 patients with 56 HCCs in the hepatic dome undergoing RFA after transarterial chemoembolization from January 2009 to December 2016. Thirty were addressed with CT fluoroscopy and 26 with US guidance. The technical success, safety margin, and local tumor progression (LTP) were evaluated.

RESULTS

Technical success rate was 100% in the CT-RFA and 84.6% in the US-RFA group (p = .04). The average safety margin was 4.8 mm in the CT-RFA and 3.0 mm in the US-RFA group (p = .01). There was no LTP among the HCCs with a safety margin >3 mm achieved in 73.3% CT-RFA and 42.3% US-RFA group tumors (p = .03). Of the US-RFA group, six required additional RFA. There was no significant inter-group difference in LTP (p = .36).

CONCLUSION

CT-guided RFA was superior to US-guided RFA with respect to the technical success rate and the acquisition of an appropriate safety margin in patients with HCC in the hepatic dome.

The guiding value of microvascular invasion for treating early recurrent small hepatocellular carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with microvascular invasion (MVI) have worse survival. Whether the presence of MVI indicates the necessity of more aggressive locoregional treatments for recurrences remains to be elucidated.

METHODS

We reviewed patients who underwent curative hepatectomy for primary HCC in our institution, and 379 patients with recurrent HCC up to three nodules smaller than 3 cm were enrolled. The Kaplan-Meier method was adopted to compare the secondary recurrence-free survival (sRFS) and post-recurrence survival (PRS) among patients undergoing hepatectomy, RFA and transarterial chemoembolization plus RFA (TACE-RFA). Cox regression analyses were performed to identify independent prognostic factors.

RESULTS

Both the sRFS and PRS of the MVI (-) group were significantly longer than those of the MVI (+) group (p = 0.001 and 0.011). For patients with MVI (-), no significant difference was found in sRFS or PRS among recurrent HCC patients receiving hepatectomy, RFA or TACE-RFA (p = 0.149 and 0.821). A similar trend was found in patients with MVI (+) (p = 0.851 and 0.960). Further analysis found that TACE-RFA provided better sRFS than hepatectomy or RFA alone in patients with MVI (+) and early recurrence within two years (p = 0.036 and 0.044).

CONCLUSION

For HCC patients with MVI (+) and early small recurrence, TACE-RFA could achieve better prognosis than hepatectomy or RFA alone, while RFA alone provided comparable survival benefits compared with hepatectomy or TACE-RFA in other HCC patients with small recurrence.