The effect of high-intensity focused ultrasound guided by magnetic resonance therapy on obstetrical outcomes in patients with uterine fibroids – experiences from the main Polish center and a review of current data

Combination of HIFU with sulfur hexafluoride microbubbles in the treatment of solitary uterine fibroids: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and safety of sulfur hexafluoride microbubbles on ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation of uterine fibroids.

METHODS

Studies that compared HIFU-microbubble combination with HIFU-only in patients with uterine fibroids were searched from inception to April 2022. The standardized mean difference (SMD) or relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for different outcome parameters was calculated.

RESULTS

Seven studies were included, with a total of 901 patients (519 in the combination group and 382 in the HIFU-only group). The energy consumption for treating 1 cm3 of the lesion in the combination group was less than that in the HIFU-only group [SMD =  - 2.19, 95%CI (- 3.81, - 0.57), p = 0.008]. The use of microbubbles was associated with shortening the duration of the treatment and sonication [SMD =  - 2.60, 95%CI (- 4.09, - 1.10), p = 0.0007; SMD =  - 2.11, 95%CI (- 3.30, - 0.92), p = 0.0005]. The rates of significant greyscale changes during HIFU were greater in the combination group, as well as the increase of non-perfused volume ratio [RR = 1.26, 95%CI (1.04, 1.54), p = 0.02; SMD = 0.32, 95%CI (0.03, 0.61), p = 0.03]. The average sonication durations to reach significant greyscale changes and for ablating 1 cm3 of the fibroid lesion were shorter in the combination group [SMD =  - 1.24, 95%CI (- 2.02, - 0.45), p = 0.002; SMD =  - 0.22, 95%CI (- 0.42, - 0.02), p = 0.03]. The two groups had similar post-HIFU adverse effects, while the combination group had fewer intraprocedural adverse events like abdominal pain, sacrum pain, and leg pain.

CONCLUSIONS

Sulfur hexafluoride microbubbles can be safely used to enhance and accelerate the ablation effects of HIFU in the treatment of uterine fibroids.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

The combination of HIFU with sulfur hexafluoride microbubbles offers a promising non-invasive treatment option for patients with uterine fibroids.

KEY POINTS

• Sulfur hexafluoride microbubbles combined with ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (USgHIFU) has potential advantages in the treatment of uterine fibroids. • Sulfur hexafluoride microbubbles not only enhance the effects of USgHIFU treatment for uterine fibroids but also shorten its duration. • Sulfur hexafluoride microbubbles do not increase the incidence of USgHIFU-related adverse events in the treatment of uterine fibroids.

GnRH agonists and antagonists in therapy of symptomatic uterine fibroids - current roles and future perspectives

INTRODUCTION

Uterine fibroids are the most common noncancerous tumors in women of childbearing age. This review was developed to evaluate the current role of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists and antagonists in the therapy of symptomatic uterine fibroids.

AREAS COVERED

There is a great need for alternative methods for surgical treatment of uterine fibroids. Hormonal therapy remains the first-line treatment option for most patients. GnRH analogs (agonists and antagonists) modulate the pulsatile release of GnRH. This review summarizes the available literature concerning pharmacologic principles underlying the mechanism of action of GnRH and its analogs, as well as individual therapeutic applications to which these drugs have been applied.

EXPERT OPINION

In many cases, it is possible to try to treat uterine fibroids pharmacologically. Both groups of GnRH analogs are used in therapy, agonists instead as a preparation for surgery, and antagonists as a drug for long-term use. It is essential to develop this path further and look for at least long-term-release systems or new methods of administering these drugs. It is also important from the patient's perspective to search for possible drugs that may have an additive effect of decreasing side effects when combined with GnRH analogs.

Reproductive and Obstetric Outcomes after UAE, HIFU, and TFA of Uterine Fibroids: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Novel treatment options for uterine fibroids, such as uterine artery embolization (UAE), ultrasound-guided and magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (USgHIFU and MRgHIFU), and transcervical radiofrequency ablation (TFA) methods, are widely used in clinical practice. This systematic review and meta-analysis (CRD42022297312) aims to assess and compare reproductive and obstetric outcomes in women who underwent these minimally invasive approaches for uterine fibroids. The search was performed in PubMed, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science and Embase. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) and Cochrane guidelines. The articles were selected to meet the following eligibility criteria: (1) research article, (2) human subject research, and (3) the study of pregnancy outcomes after the treatment of uterine fibroids by either one of three methods-UAE, HIFU, and TFA. The analysis of 25 eligible original articles shows a similar rate of live births for UAE, USgHIFU, MRgHIFU, and TFA (70.8%, 73.5%, 70%, and 75%, respectively). The number of pregnancies varied considerably among these studies, as well as the mean age of pregnant women. However, the results of pregnancy outcomes for TFA are insufficient to draw firm conclusions, since only 24 women became pregnant in these studies, resulting in three live births. The miscarriage rate was highest in the UAE group (19.2%). USgHIFU was associated with a higher rate of placental abnormalities compared to UAE (2.8% vs. 1.6%). The pooled estimate of pregnancies was 17.31% to 44.52% after UAE, 18.69% to 78.53% after HIFU, and 2.09% to 7.63% after TFA. The available evidence confirmed that these minimally invasive uterine-sparing treatment options for uterine fibroids are a good approach for patients wishing to preserve their fertility, with comparable reproductive and obstetric outcomes among the different techniques.

HIFU as an alternative modality for patients with uterine fibroids who require fertility-sparing treatment

OBJECTIVES

To compare pregnancy outcomes after high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation (HIFU), myomectomy and uterine artery embolization (UAE) for fertility-sparing patients with uterine fibroids and to investigate the possible mechanism of improving pregnancy by HIFU.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A meta-analysis of 54 studies containing 12,367 patients was conducted to compare the pregnancy outcomes of three fertility-sparing therapies. And a retrospective self-control study of 26 patients with uterine fibroids from May 2019 to December 2020 was performed to assess the blood flow impedance of bilateral uterine arteries before and after HIFU.

RESULTS

In the analysis by treatment option, the pregnancy rate after myomectomy was 0.43 (95% CI 0.36-0.49), which was higher than 0.18 (95% CI 0.10-0.26) after HIFU, the latter was significantly higher than that after UAE (ratio 0.08, 95% CI 0.06-0.10). The miscarriage rate after HIFU was 0.08 (95% CI 0.04-0.12), which was similar to 0.15 (95% CI 0.09-0.21) after myomectomy and also similar to 0.16 after UAE (95% CI 0.01-0.30). In the subgroup analysis, women who received ultrasound guided HIFU (USgHIFU) were more likely to have ideal pregnancy outcomes than that after magnetic resonance imaging-guided HIFU. The pulsatility index and resistance index on the right side were significantly higher 3 months after HIFU than before (1.637 ± 0.435 vs. 1.845 ± 0.469; p = 0.033; 0.729 ± 0.141 vs. 0.784 ± 0.081, p = 0.039).

CONCLUSIONS

HIFU, especially USgHIFU, may be an alternative fertility-sparing modality for patients with uterine fibroids over 40 years old. HIFU may contribute to improving pregnancy rates by elevating uterine blood flow impedance.

Ultrasound-Guided High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound for Devascularization of Uterine Fibroid: A Feasibility Study

This study aimed to establish the feasibility of ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (USgHIFU) for devascularization of uterine fibroids. Ultrasound color Doppler flow imaging (CDFI) and B-mode imaging were used to target fibroid vascularity. The vessels were covered and ablated by high-intensity focused ultrasound spots. In this study, 42 fibroids with a volume of 66.98 ± 4.00 cm³ were treated. No blood flow was detected by post-treatment CDFI in 40 fibroids. The 6-mo non-perfusion volume rate was 75.23% ± 34.77% (n = 40). The mean shrinkage in fibroid volume was 38.20% and 43.89%, respectively, at 1 and 6 mo after treatment (p < 0.001). The uterine fibroid symptom and quality of life scores were reduced by 9.43% at 1 mo and 26.66% at 6-mo after treatment (p < 0.001). No serious adverse event was observed. This study demonstrates the feasibility of USgHIFU-induced fibroid devascularization, and more studies are required for the evaluation of safety and efficacy.

The comparison of myomectomy, UAE and MRgFUS in the treatment of uterine fibroids: a meta analysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare the re-intervention rates of myomectomy, uterine artery embolization (UAE) and magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound surgery (MRgFUS) for uterine fibroids (UFs) in different follow-up time.

METHODS

Two investigators searched PubMed for clinical studies published in English from 1 Jan 2000 to 31 Dec 2020, and independently examined the paper to select qualified studies, extracted relevant information and assessed the risk of bias. Meanwhile, a meta-analysis of 31 studies containing totally 42103 patients was conducted to compare the re-intervention rate of myomectomy, UAE and MRgFUS.

RESULTS

In the meta-analysis of 42103 patients, the 12-month re-intervention rates of myomectomy, UAE and MRgFUS for UFs were 0.06 (95%CI, 0.01-0.11), 0.07 (95%CI, 0.06-0.09), and 0.12 (95%CI, 0.04-0.20) respectively. The 24-month re-intervention rates were 0.10 (95%CI, 0.04-0.16), 0.08 (95%CI, 0.01-0.17), and 0.14 (95%CI, 0.07-0.21) respectively. The 36-month re-intervention rates were 0.09 (95%CI, 0.05-0.13), 0.14 (95%CI, 0.05-0.23), and 0.22 (95%CI, 0.11-0.32) respectively. Additionally, the 60-month re-intervention rates were 0.19 (95%CI, 0.15-0.24), 0.21 (95%CI, 0.17-0.25), and 0.49 (95%CI, 0.21-0.77) respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The myomectomy has the lowest re-intervention rate of the three regimens in short time and long time while the MRgFUS has the highest. The rate of MRgFUS increased rapidly in the 60th month after the treatment.

High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation versus surgical interventions for the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To compare the treatment success and safety of ultrasound- and MR-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) with surgery for treating symptomatic uterine fibroids.

METHODS

We searched studies comparing HIFU with surgery for fibroids in different databases from January 2000 to July 2020. The mean difference (MD) or relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for different outcome parameters was synthesized.

RESULTS

We included 10 studies involving 4450 women. Compared with the surgery group, the decrease in uterine fibroid severity score at 6- and 12-month follow-up was higher in the HIFU group (MD - 4.16, 95% CI - 7.39 to - 0.94, and MD - 2.44, 95% CI - 3.67 to - 1.20, p < 0.05). The increase in quality-of-life (QoL) score at 6- and 12-month follow-up was higher in the HIFU group (MD 2.13, 95% CI 0.86 to 3.14, and MD 2.34, 95% CI 0.82 to 3.85, p < 0.05). The duration of hospital stay and the time to return to work was shorter in the HIFU group (MD - 3.41 days, 95% CI - 5.11 to - 1.70, and MD - 11.61 days, 95% CI - 19.73 to - 3.50, p < 0.05). The incidence of significant complications was lower in the HIFU group (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.81, p < 0.05). The differences in the outcomes of adverse events, symptom recurrence, re-intervention, and pregnancy were not statistically significant (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

HIFU is superior to surgery in terms of symptomatic relief, improvement in QoL, recovery, and significant complications. However, HIFU showed comparable effects to surgery regarding the incidence of adverse events, symptom recurrence, re-intervention, and pregnancy.

KEY POINTS

• HIFU ablation is superior to surgery in terms of symptomatic relief, improvement in QoL, recovery, and significant complications. • HIFU has comparable effects to surgery in terms of symptom recurrence rate, re-intervention rate, and pregnancy rate, indicating that HIFU is a promising non-invasive therapy that seems not to raise the risk of recurrence and re-intervention or deteriorate fertility compared to surgical approaches in women with fibroids. • There is still a lack of good-quality comparative data and further randomized studies are necessary to provide sufficient and reliable data, especially on re-intervention rate and pregnancy outcome.

A comparison of the pregnancy outcomes between ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation and laparoscopic myomectomy for uterine fibroids: a comparative study

Objective: To compare the pregnancy outcomes between ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (USgHIFU) ablation and laparoscopic myomectomy (LM).Materials and methods: This study included 676 women with symptomatic uterine fibroids who wished to become pregnant underwent USgHIFU or LM at three hospitals in China from 1 May 2009 to 31 May 2018. The related information of pregnancy and delivery were followed up and analyzed using the chi-square test and two-sided Student t-test.Results: The median follow-up duration was 5 (1-8) years; 20 patients (2.9%) were lost to follow-up. 320 patients were treated with UsgHIFU, and 336 were treated with LM. Two hundred nineteen (68.4%) women became pregnant after USgHIFU ablation, and 224 (66.7%) became pregnant after LM. Four hundred forty-three patients had 501 pregnancies (natural pregnancies, 405; in vitro fertilisation-embryo transfer pregnancies, 38). Average times to pregnancy were 13.6 ± 9.5 months after USgHIFU and 18.9 ± 7.3 months after LM (p < 0.05). The rate of cesarean delivery was lower in the USgHIFU group (41.6%) than in the LM group (54.9%) (p < 0.05). Incidences of placenta increta, placenta previa, and postpartum hemorrhage were low after USgHIFU compared with after LM. Incidences of preterm birth, fetal distress, fetal growth restriction, and puerperal infection were higher after USgHIFU than after LM. There was a risk of uterine rupture after both procedures.Conclusions: Compared with LM, USgHIFU ablation can significantly shorten the time to pregnancy, although pregnancy rates of the two procedures are similar. Some risks in pregnancy and delivery after HIFU should be evaluated and monitored.

Heating technology for malignant tumors: a review

The therapeutic application of heat is very effective in cancer treatment. Both hyperthermia, i.e., heating to 39-45 °C to induce sensitization to radiotherapy and chemotherapy, and thermal ablation, where temperatures beyond 50 °C destroy tumor cells directly are frequently applied in the clinic. Achievement of an effective treatment requires high quality heating equipment, precise thermal dosimetry, and adequate quality assurance. Several types of devices, antennas and heating or power delivery systems have been proposed and developed in recent decades. These vary considerably in technique, heating depth, ability to focus, and in the size of the heating focus. Clinically used heating techniques involve electromagnetic and ultrasonic heating, hyperthermic perfusion and conductive heating. Depending on clinical objectives and available technology, thermal therapies can be subdivided into three broad categories: local, locoregional, or whole body heating. Clinically used local heating techniques include interstitial hyperthermia and ablation, high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), scanned focused ultrasound (SFUS), electroporation, nanoparticle heating, intraluminal heating and superficial heating. Locoregional heating techniques include phased array systems, capacitive systems and isolated perfusion. Whole body techniques focus on prevention of heat loss supplemented with energy deposition in the body, e.g., by infrared radiation. This review presents an overview of clinical hyperthermia and ablation devices used for local, locoregional, and whole body therapy. Proven and experimental clinical applications of thermal ablation and hyperthermia are listed. Methods for temperature measurement and the role of treatment planning to control treatments are discussed briefly, as well as future perspectives for heating technology for the treatment of tumors.

Oxytocin and Misoprostol With Diclofenac in the Preparation for Magnetic Resonance-Guided High-Intensity Ultrasound Treatment of Symptomatic Uterine Fibroids: A Prospective Cohort Study

Uterine fibroids (UFs) are very common benign tumors of the female reproductive tract. According to recent reports, magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity ultrasound (MR-HIFU) appears to be a well-tolerated and efficient treatment option for UFs. However, MR-HIFU still presents several limitations. The treatment is rarely associated with achieving complete non-perfused volume (NPV). Not all patients are qualified for a final procedure, and selected women obtain very good results in such treatment. The primary objective of this experimental study was to assess the effect of transvaginal misoprostol and intravenous oxytocin preparation on UF volume change, sonication time and NPV after MR-HIFU procedure in women of reproductive age with symptomatic UFs. Secondary outcomes included the effect on the peri-procedural effectiveness of misoprostol and oxytocin. This study enrolled 247 women with symptomatic UFs; based on gynecologic examinations and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans, 128 women qualified for MR-HIFU without pharmacologic treatment, 57 women qualified for the misoprostol/diclofenac group and 62 women qualified for the oxytocin group. Pharmacologic pre-treatment improved NPV compared with non-pharmacologic treatment (average NPV: controls 61.9% ± 25.8%; oxytocin 76.8% ± 20.7%; misoprostol/diclofenac 85.2% ± 15.1%; average sonication time: controls 120 min ± 56.4%; oxytocin 111 min ± 45.4%; misoprostol/diclofenac 80 min ± 47.7%). Statistical analysis did not reveal significant intergroup differences in UF volume changes after 6 mo (controls: n = 40, 37.4% ± 27.5%; oxytocin n = 25, 45.8% ± 31%; misoprostol/diclofenac n = 19, 33.4% ± 23.2%). The misoprostol/diclofenac group, which achieved the highest NPV immediately after the MR-HIFU procedure, was characterized by the lowest UF volume change percentages 6 mo later. The administration of vasoconstrictor drugs (oxytocin and misoprostol/diclofenac) to support MR-HIFU in UF treatment is a new issue that may improve the total effectiveness of this method. Randomized controlled trials are necessary to estimate the real effect of vasoconstrictors on MR-HIFU.

Systematic review of reproductive outcomes after High Intensity Focused Ultrasound treatment of uterine fibroids

PURPOSE

Myomectomy is currently the gold standard for the treatment of uterine fibroids in women who desire pregnancy. However, this surgical fibroid removal has a long convalescence. Promising alternatives may be non-invasive High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) under either MRI (MR-HIFU) or ultrasound guidance (USgHIFU). In this systematic review, an overview is provided of reproductive outcomes after these two relatively new ablation techniques.

METHOD

A systematic literature search was performed to identify studies reporting reproductive outcomes after HIFU treatment of fibroids. Only peer reviewed, full papers were included. Outcomes included pregnancy-, live-birth- miscarriage and caesarian section rate, time to conceive, reported complications, and possible prognostic factors.

RESULTS

In total 21 studies were included. Fourteen studies reported 124 pregnancies after MR-HIFU. Two placenta previas and no uterus ruptures were reported. Pregnancy rates were only retrospectively collected and ranged between 7% and 36%. Miscarriage rate in the oldest and largest prospective registry was 39%. After USgHIFU 366 pregnancies were reported with one fetal intrauterine death, six placenta previas and no uterus ruptures. The only prospective study reported a pregnancy rate of 47% and a miscarriage rate of 11%. Possible prognostic factors like age were not available in most studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the heterogeneous data currently available, reproductive outcomes after HIFU appear non-inferior to outcomes after the current standard of care. However, a (randomized) controlled trial comparing reproductive outcomes after HIFU and standard care is necessary to provide sufficient evidence on the preferred fibroid treatment for women with a pregnancy wish.

Uterine Myomas: Focused Ultrasound Surgery

Uterine fibroids are the most common neoplasm in women. These lesions may be associated with impaired fertility and adverse obstetric outcomes. Medical treatment, myomectomy, hysterectomy and uterine artery embolization have been employed for the management of uterine fibroids. Focused ultrasound surgery (FUS) is a relatively recent technique that relies on mechanical and thermal energy of ultrasound for the ablation of a target tissue under an imaging guidance, that can be either ultrasound (US-guided FUS, USgFUS) or magnetic resonance (MR-guided FUS, MRgFUS). Pre- and peri-menopausal women are potential candidates for treatment; however, individual criteria need to be evaluated in order to establish the eligibility for the procedure. FUS procedure can be performed in an outpatient setting; it is a safe and effective treatment that has demonstrated to reduce symptoms associated with uterine fibroids. The adverse event rate is 8.7% and only 0.2% of patients experiences major complications. Pregnancy is possible after the treatment, and no damage to the endometrium has been observed following FUS procedure.

Relugolix for the treatment of uterine fibroids

INTRODUCTION

Uterine fibroids (UF) are benign tumors common in premenopausal women, with strong impact on the health-care systems. For many years, surgery represented the only therapy for symptomatic fibroids. However, clinicians are observing a switch from surgery to noninvasive methods; in particular, medical treatment has been shown to be efficacious in obtaining a bleeding reduction and in ameliorating patient conditions.

AREAS COVERED

The authors review the current options available for the treatment of women with UF, with a special focus on the newest one, relugolix. It is an orally active non-peptide Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH)-receptor antagonist recently licensed for women with symptomatic fibroids. Relugolix is a well-tolerated safe drug; it is effective in inducing a dose-dependent decrease in menstrual blood loss, with faster reduction of heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) and a greater shrinkage in fibroid volume compared to the current standard of GnRH agonist treatment.

EXPERT OPINION

Relugolix is a promising drug for the non-surgical treatment of women with UF. To date, the only published data come from a well-selected Japanese female population study while results from worldwide ongoing studies are ongoing in order to confirm the efficacy of this GnRH agonist receptor.

The Evolving Role of Natural Compounds in the Medical Treatment of Uterine Fibroids

Uterine fibroids (UFs) remain a significant health issue for many women, with a disproportionate impact on women of color, likely due to both genetic and environmental factors. The prevalence of UFs is estimated to be approximately 70% depending on population. UF-derived clinical symptoms include pelvic pain, excessive uterine bleeding, gastrointestinal and voiding problems, as well as impaired fertility. Nowadays numerous methods of UF treatment are available-from conservative treatment to invasive surgeries. Selecting an appropriate treatment option should be individualized and adjusted to the patient's expectations as much as possible. So far, the mainstay of treatment is surgery, but their negative impact of future fertility is clear. On the other hand, emerging new pharmaceutical options have significant adverse effects like liver function impairment, hot flashes, bone density loss, endometrial changes, and inability to attempt conception during treatment. Several natural compounds are found to help treat UFs and relieve their symptoms. In this review we summarize all the current available data about natural compounds that may be beneficial for patients with UFs, especially those who want to preserve their future fertility or have treatment while actively pursuing conception. Vitamin D, epigallocatechin gallate, berberine, curcumin, and others are being used as alternative UF treatments. Moreover, we propose the concept of using combined therapies of natural compounds on their own or combined with hormonal agents to manage UFs. There is a strong need for more human clinical trials involving these compounds before promoting widespread usage.

The potential role of elagolix for treating uterine bleeding associated to uterine myomas

INTRODUCTION

Uterine myomas represents a widespread gynecological disease of women in reproductive age. Although surgery remains the first choice for treating most patients, in the last years, new medical approaches have been considered in order to ameliorate heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) related to their presence. Elagolix is a second-generation gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist under investigation for the long-term treatment of uterine myomas.

AREAS COVERED

The aim of this drug evaluation is to give a complete overview of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data on elagolix for treating HMB related to uterine myomas and to report the results of the current clinical trials in this setting.

EXPERT OPINION

In two previous phase II studies, this drug succeeded in ameliorating blood loss and quality of life of patients affected by uterine myomas with a good safety profile. Three phase III trials (ELARIS UF-I, UF-II, and EXTEND) investigated the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of elagolix at 300 mg twice daily with add-back therapy. The primary endpoint, consisting in the reduction in HMB compared to placebo, was met in the majority of patients under treatment. Currently, elagolix is under investigation in two other ongoing multicenter phase III clinical studies.

The role of magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound in fertility-sparing treatment of uterine fibroids-current perspectives

Uterine fibroids (UFs) are the most common benign tumours of the female reproductive system and the most frequent reason for hysterectomy worldwide. UFs are reported in 20%–70% of women of reproductive age depending on a study group. Although most women with UFs are asymptomatic, over 30% of them will present with different symptoms. Abnormal uterine bleeding, pain, pressure and infertility are the most common. Lesions that cause these kinds of symptoms may require medical intervention.

Trends in UF treatment change along with patient awareness and the introduction of new methods and techniques. Selecting an appropriate treatment option should be individualised and adjusted to the patient’s expectations as much as possible. This choice will mostly depend on the patient’s age, UF location, the size and number of lesions, severity of symptoms and, most importantly, the patient’s expectations concerning the preservation of fertility. Observations made for the past few years showed an increasing number of pre- and perimenopausal women who wish to preserve their uterus or decline surgery. In line with current trends and demands in medicine, great importance is attached to the development and upgrade of new minimally invasive or noninvasive procedures in UF therapy.

Magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (MR-HIFU) is not associated with severe destruction of the uterine cavity and walls. For this reason, this method may be considered as a kind of hope in fertility-sparing UF therapy and the data about its use in this indication raises future hope. In this review, we summarise the available data on the use of MR-HIFU as a fertility-sparing method in the treatment of UFs. We also indicate how it could evolve in the future.

According to the available data, MR-HIFU is a relatively safe noninvasive method which seems not to deteriorate fertility compared to the pre-treatment status. MR-HIFU may constitute an alternative solution and be chosen in patients who meet the qualification criteria and deny other methods, which also facilitates the use of other treatment options in case the procedure is ineffective. Further randomised studies are necessary to confirm the above information.

Nano-Enhanced Drug Delivery and Therapeutic Ultrasound for Cancer Treatment and Beyond

While ultrasound is most widely known for its use in diagnostic imaging, the energy carried by ultrasound waves can be utilized to influence cell function and drug delivery. Consequently, our ability to use ultrasound energy at a given intensity unlocks the opportunity to use the ultrasound for therapeutic applications. Indeed, in the last decade ultrasound-based therapies have emerged with promising treatment modalities for several medical conditions. More recently, ultrasound in combination with nanomedicines, i.e., nanoparticles, has been shown to have substantial potential to enhance the efficacy of many treatments including cancer, Alzheimer disease or osteoarthritis. The concept of ultrasound combined with drug delivery is still in its infancy and more research is needed to unfold the mechanisms and interactions of ultrasound with different nanoparticles types and with various cell types. Here we present the state-of-art in ultrasound and ultrasound-assisted drug delivery with a particular focus on cancer treatments. Notably, this review discusses the application of high intensity focus ultrasound for non-invasive tumor ablation and immunomodulatory effects of ultrasound, as well as the efficacy of nanoparticle-enhanced ultrasound therapies for different medical conditions. Furthermore, this review presents safety considerations related to ultrasound technology and gives recommendations in the context of system design and operation.