Locoregional peritoneal hyperthermia to enhance the effectiveness of chemotherapy in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis: a simulation study comparing different locoregional heating systems

Robust, planning-based targeted locoregional tumour heating in small animals

Objective.To improve hyperthermia in clinical practice, pre-clinical hyperthermia research is essential to investigate hyperthermia effects and assess novel treatment strategies. Translating pre-clinical hyperthermia findings into clinically viable protocols requires laboratory animal treatment techniques similar to clinical hyperthermia techniques. The ALBA micro8 electromagnetic heating system (Med-logix SRL, Rome, Italy) has recently been developed to provide the targeted locoregional tumour heating currently lacking for pre-clinical research. This study evaluates the heat focusing properties of this device and its ability to induce robust locoregional tumour heating under realistic physiological conditions using simulations.Approach.Simulations were performed using the Plan2Heat treatment planning package (Amsterdam UMC, the Netherlands). First, the specific absorption rate (SAR) focus was characterised using a homogeneous phantom. Hereafter, a digital mouse model was used for the characterisation of heating robustness in a mouse. Device settings were optimised for treatment of a pancreas tumour and tested for varying circumstances. The impact of uncertainties in tissue property and perfusion values was evaluated using polynomial chaos expansion. Treatment quality and robustness were evaluated based on SAR and temperature distributions.Main results.The SAR distributions within the phantom are well-focused and can be adjusted to target any specific location. The focus size (full-width half-maximum) is a spheroid with diameters 9 mm (radially) and 20 mm (axially). The mouse model simulations show strong robustness against respiratory motion and intestine and stomach filling (∆T90≤0.14°C).Mouse positioning errors in the cranial-caudal direction lead to∆T90≤0.23°C. Uncertainties in tissue property and perfusion values were found to impact the treatment plan up to 0.56 °C (SD), with a variation onT90of 0.32 °C (1 SD).Significance.Our work shows that the pre-clinical phased-array system can provide adequate and robust locoregional heating of deep-seated target regions in mice. Using our software, robust treatment plans can be generated for pre-clinical hyperthermia research.

On the Evaluation of the Hyperthermic Efficiency of Magnetic Scaffolds

Goal: Deep-seated tumors (DST) can be treated using thermoseeds exposed to a radiofrequency magnetic field for performing local interstitial hyperthermia treatment (HT). Several research efforts were oriented to the manufacturing of novel biocompatible magnetic nanostructured thermo-seeds, called magnetic scaffolds (MagS). Several iron-doped bioceramics or magnetic polymers in various formulations are available. However, the crucial evaluation of their heating potential has been carried out with significantly different, lab specific, variable experimental conditions and protocols often ignoring the several error sources and inaccuracies estimation. Methods: This work comments and provides a perspective analysis of an experimental protocol for the estimation methodology of the specific absorption rate (SAR) of MagS for DST HT. Numerical multiphysics simultions have been performed to outline the theoretical framework. After the in silico analysis, an experimental case is considered and tested. Results: From the simulations, we found that large overestimation in the SAR values can be found, due to the axial misplacement in the radiofrequency coil, while the radial misplacement has a lower impact on the estimated SAR value. Conclusions: The averaging of multiple temperature records is needed to reliably and effectively estimate the SAR of MagS for DST HT.

Experimental and computational evaluation of capacitive hyperthermia

OBJECTIVE

Hyperthermia as an enhancer of radio- and/or chemotherapy has been confirmed by various trials. Quite a few positive randomized trials have been carried out with capacitive hyperthermia systems (CHS), even though specific absorption rates (SAR) in deep regions are known to be inferior to the established annular-phased array techniques. Due to a lack of systematic SAR measurements for current capacitive technology, we performed phantom measurements in combination with simulation studies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

According to the current guidelines, homogeneous and inhomogeneous agarose phantoms were manufactured for the commercial CHS Celsius42. Temperature/time curves were registered, and specific absorption rate (SAR) profiles and distributions were derived using the temperature gradient method. We implemented models for electrodes and phantom setups for simulation studies using Sim4Life.

RESULTS

For a standard total power of 200 W, we measured effective SAR until depths of 6-8 cm in a homogeneous phantom, which indicates fair heating conditions for tumor diseases in superficial and intermediate depths. A fat layer of 1 cm strongly weakens the SAR, but 10-20 W/kg are still achieved in intermediate to deep regions (2-10 cm). In the phantom setup with integrated bone, we measured low SAR of 5-10 W/kg in the cancellous bone. Our simulations could fairly describe the measured SAR distributions, but predict tendentially higher SAR than measured. Additional simulations suggest that we would achieve higher SAR with vital fatty tissue and bone metastases in clinical situations.

CONCLUSION

Capacitive systems are suitable to heat superficial and medium-deep tumors as well as some bone metastases, and CHS application is feasible for a specific class of patients with pelvic and abdominal tumors. These findings are consistent with positive clinical studies.

HIPEC in Peritoneal Metastasis of Gastric Origin: A Systematic Review of Regimens and Techniques

(1) Background: Peritoneal metastasis in gastric cancer is associated with a poor prognosis. Complete cytoreductive surgery including gastrectomy and complete removal of all peritoneal lesions followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) achieves promising results. There exists an immersive variety of approaches for HIPEC that makes it difficult to weigh different results obtained in the literature. In order to enable standardization and development of HIPEC, we here present a systematic review of different drug regimens and technical approaches. (2) Methods: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched on 26 May 2021 using the mesh terms “intraperitoneal chemotherapy AND gastric cancer”. Under consideration of systematic review guidelines, articles reporting on HIPEC in combination with CRS were selected. Data on duration, drugs, dosage, and other application parameters as well as morbidity and long term survival data were extracted for subsequent statistical analysis, tabulation, and descriptive synthesis. We assessed the risk of bias due to inhomogeneity of the patient cohort and incompleteness of report of HIPEC parameters. (3) Results: Out of 1421 screened publications, 42 publications presenting data from 1325 patients met the criteria. Most of the publications were single institutional retrospective cohort studies. The most common HIPEC regimen is performed after gastrointestinal anastomosis and consists of 50–200 mg/m² cisplatinum and 30–40 mg/m² mytomycin C at 42–43 °C for 60–90 min in a closed abdomen HIPEC system with three tubes. Almost every study reported incompletely on HIPEC parameters. Lower rates of anastomotic leakage were reported in studies that performed HIPEC after gastrointestinal anastomosis. Studies that performed open HIPEC and integrated a two-drug regimen indicated better overall survival rates. (4) Discussion: This is an exhaustive overview of the use of drug regimens and techniques for HIPEC after CRS for gastric cancer peritoneal metastasis. Other indications and application modes of intraperitoneal chemotherapy such as prophylactic or palliative HIPEC apart from CRS were not addressed. (5) Conclusion: Complete report of HIPEC parameters should be included in every publication. A consensus for dose expression either per BSA or as flat dose is desirable for comparison of the drug regimens. Despite numerous variations, we identified the most common regimens and techniques and their advantages and disadvantages according to the data in the literature. More phase I/II studies are needed to identify the best approach for HIPEC. (6) Other: This review was not supported by third parties.

Adapt2Heat: treatment planning-assisted locoregional hyperthermia by on-line visualization, optimization and re-optimization of SAR and temperature distributions

BACKGROUND

Hyperthermia treatment planning is increasingly used in clinical applications and recommended in quality assurance guidelines. Assistance in phase-amplitude steering during treatment requires dedicated software for on-line visualization of SAR/temperature distributions and fast re-optimization in response to hot spots. As such software tools are not yet commercially available, we developed Adapt2Heat for on-line adaptive hyperthermia treatment planning and illustrate possible application by different relevant real patient examples.

METHODS

Adapt2Heat was developed as a separate module of the treatment planning software Plan2Heat. Adapt2Heat runs on a Linux operating system and was developed in C++, using the open source Qt, Qwt and VTK libraries. A graphical user interface allows interactive and flexible on-line use of hyperthermia treatment planning. Predicted SAR/temperature distributions and statistics for selected phase-amplitude settings can be visualized instantly and settings can be re-optimized manually or automatically in response to hot spots.

RESULTS

Pretreatment planning E-Field, SAR and temperature calculations are performed with Plan2Heat and imported in Adapt2Heat. Examples show that Adapt2Heat can be helpful in assisting with phase-amplitude steering, e.g., by suppressing indicated hot spots. The effects of phase-amplitude adjustments on the tumor and potential hot spot locations are comprehensively visualized, allowing intuitive and flexible assistance by treatment planning during locoregional hyperthermia treatments.

CONCLUSION

Adapt2Heat provides an intuitive and flexible treatment planning tool for on-line treatment planning-assisted hyperthermia. Extensive features for visualization and (re-)optimization during treatment allow practical use in many locoregional hyperthermia applications. This type of tools are indispensable for enhancing the quality of hyperthermia treatment delivery.

Fast Adaptive Temperature-Based Re-Optimization Strategies for On-Line Hot Spot Suppression during Locoregional Hyperthermia

Simple Summary

When treatment limiting hot spots occur during locoregional hyperthermia (i.e., heating tumors to 40–44 °C for ~1 h), system settings are adjusted based on experience. In this study, we developed and evaluated treatment planning with temperature-based re-optimization and compared the predicted effectiveness to clinically applied protocol/experience-based steering. Re-optimization times were typically ~10 s; sufficiently fast for on-line use. Effective hot spot suppression was predicted, while maintaining adequate tumor heating. Inducing new hot spots was avoided. Temperature-based re-optimization to suppress treatment limiting hot spots seemed feasible to match the effectiveness of long-term clinical experience and will be further evaluated in a clinical setting. When numerical algorithms are proven to match long-term experience, the overall treatment quality within hyperthermia centers can significantly improve. Implementing these strategies would then imply that treatments become less dependent on the experience of the center/operator.

Abstract

Background: Experience-based adjustments in phase-amplitude settings are applied to suppress treatment limiting hot spots that occur during locoregional hyperthermia for pelvic tumors. Treatment planning could help to further optimize treatments. The aim of this research was to develop temperature-based re-optimization strategies and compare the predicted effectiveness with clinically applied protocol/experience-based steering. Methods: This study evaluated 22 hot spot suppressions in 16 cervical cancer patients (mean age 67 ± 13 year). As a first step, all potential hot spot locations were represented by a spherical region, with a user-specified diameter. For fast and robust calculations, the hot spot temperature was represented by a user-specified percentage of the voxels with the largest heating potential (HPP). Re-optimization maximized tumor T90, with constraints to suppress the hot spot and avoid any significant increase in other regions. Potential hot spot region diameter and HPP were varied and objective functions with and without penalty terms to prevent and minimize temperature increase at other potential hot spot locations were evaluated. Predicted effectiveness was compared with clinically applied steering results. Results: All strategies showed effective hot spot suppression, without affecting tumor temperatures, similar to clinical steering. To avoid the risk of inducing new hot spots, HPP should not exceed 10%. Adding a penalty term to the objective function to minimize the temperature increase at other potential hot spot locations was most effective. Re-optimization times were typically ~10 s. Conclusion: Fast on-line re-optimization to suppress treatment limiting hot spots seems feasible to match effectiveness of ~30 years clinical experience and will be further evaluated in a clinical setting.

ESHO benchmarks for computational modeling and optimization in hyperthermia therapy

BACKGROUND

The success of cancer hyperthermia (HT) treatments is strongly dependent on the temperatures achieved in the tumor and healthy tissues as it correlates with treatment efficacy and safety, respectively. Hyperthermia treatment planning (HTP) simulations have become pivotal for treatment optimization due to the possibility for pretreatment planning, optimization and decision making, as well as real-time treatment guidance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The same computational methods deployed in HTP are also used for in silico studies. These are of great relevance for the development of new HT devices and treatment approaches. To aid this work, 3 D patient models have been recently developed and made available for the HT community. Unfortunately, there is no consensus regarding tissue properties, simulation settings, and benchmark applicators, which significantly influence the clinical relevance of computational outcomes.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Herein, we propose a comprehensive set of applicator benchmarks, efficacy and safety optimization algorithms, simulation settings and clinical parameters, to establish benchmarks for method comparison and code verification, to provide guidance, and in view of the 2021 ESHO Grand Challenge (Details on the ESHO grand challenge on HTP will be provided at https://www.esho.info/).

CONCLUSION

We aim to establish guidelines to promote standardization within the hyperthermia community such that novel approaches can quickly prove their benefit as quickly as possible in clinically relevant simulation scenarios. This paper is primarily focused on radiofrequency and microwave hyperthermia but, since 3 D simulation studies on heating with ultrasound are now a reality, guidance as well as a benchmark for ultrasound-based hyperthermia are also included.

Heating technology for malignant tumors: a review

The therapeutic application of heat is very effective in cancer treatment. Both hyperthermia, i.e., heating to 39-45 °C to induce sensitization to radiotherapy and chemotherapy, and thermal ablation, where temperatures beyond 50 °C destroy tumor cells directly are frequently applied in the clinic. Achievement of an effective treatment requires high quality heating equipment, precise thermal dosimetry, and adequate quality assurance. Several types of devices, antennas and heating or power delivery systems have been proposed and developed in recent decades. These vary considerably in technique, heating depth, ability to focus, and in the size of the heating focus. Clinically used heating techniques involve electromagnetic and ultrasonic heating, hyperthermic perfusion and conductive heating. Depending on clinical objectives and available technology, thermal therapies can be subdivided into three broad categories: local, locoregional, or whole body heating. Clinically used local heating techniques include interstitial hyperthermia and ablation, high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), scanned focused ultrasound (SFUS), electroporation, nanoparticle heating, intraluminal heating and superficial heating. Locoregional heating techniques include phased array systems, capacitive systems and isolated perfusion. Whole body techniques focus on prevention of heat loss supplemented with energy deposition in the body, e.g., by infrared radiation. This review presents an overview of clinical hyperthermia and ablation devices used for local, locoregional, and whole body therapy. Proven and experimental clinical applications of thermal ablation and hyperthermia are listed. Methods for temperature measurement and the role of treatment planning to control treatments are discussed briefly, as well as future perspectives for heating technology for the treatment of tumors.

Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: A Critical Review

Simple Summary

Patients with cancer of the digestive system or ovarian cancer are at risk of developing peritoneal metastases (PM). In some patients with PM, surgery followed by intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy has emerged as a valid treatment option. The addition of hyperthermia is thought to further enhance the efficacy of IP chemotherapy. However, the results of recent clinical trials in large bowel cancer have put into question the use of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Here, we review the rationale and current results of HIPEC for PM and propose a roadmap to further progress.

Abstract

With increasing awareness amongst physicians and improved radiological imaging techniques, the peritoneal cavity is increasingly recognized as an important metastatic site in various malignancies. Prognosis of these patients is usually poor as traditional treatment including surgical resection or systemic treatment is relatively ineffective. Intraperitoneal delivery of chemotherapeutic agents is thought to be an attractive alternative as this results in high tumor tissue concentrations with limited systemic exposure. The addition of hyperthermia aims to potentiate the anti-tumor effects of chemotherapy, resulting in the concept of heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for the treatment of peritoneal metastases as it was developed about 3 decades ago. With increasing experience, HIPEC has become a safe and accepted treatment offered in many centers around the world. However, standardization of the technique has been poor and results from clinical trials have been equivocal. As a result, the true value of HIPEC in the treatment of peritoneal metastases remains a matter of debate. The current review aims to provide a critical overview of the theoretical concept and preclinical and clinical study results, to outline areas of persisting uncertainty, and to propose a framework to better define the role of HIPEC in the treatment of peritoneal malignancies.

A Four-Inflow Construction to Ensure Thermal Stability and Uniformity during Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) in Rats

BACKGROUND

Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) is used for treating peritoneal metastases of various origins. Present HIPEC protocols have rarely been validated for relevant parameters such as optimal agent, duration and perfusate temperature. In vitro experiments are not completely representative of clinical circumstances. Therefore, a good preclinical in vivo HIPEC model is needed in which temperature distributions can be well-controlled and are stable throughout treatments.

METHODS

We designed a setup able to generate and maintain a homogeneous flow during a 90-min HIPEC procedure using our in-house developed treatment planning tools and computer aided design (CAD) techniques. Twelve rats were treated with heated phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) using two catheter setups (one vs. four- inflows) and extensive thermometry. Simulated and measured thermal distribution and core temperatures were evaluated for the different setups.

RESULTS

Overall, the four-inflow resulted in more stable and more homogeneous thermal distributions than the one-inflow, with lower standard deviations (0.79 °C vs. 1.41 °C at the outflow, respectively) and less thermal losses. The average thermal loss was 0.4 °C lower for rats treated with the four-inflow setup. Rat core temperatures were kept stable using occasional tail cooling, and rarely exceeded 39 °C.

CONCLUSION

Increasing the number of inflow catheters from one to four resulted in increased flow and temperature homogeneity and stability. Tail cooling is an adequate technique to prevent rats from overheating during 90-min treatments. This validated design can improve accuracy in future in vivo experiments investigating the impact of relevant parameters on the efficacy of different HIPEC protocols.

Impact of Number of Segmented Tissues on SAR Prediction Accuracy in Deep Pelvic Hyperthermia Treatment Planning

Simple Summary

Hyperthermia treatment planning is the process of optimizing treatment quality using pre-treatment simulations. Although it has become a powerful tool, prediction accuracy is strongly dependent on the patient model. For deep hyperthermia in the pelvis, it is common that only four tissue categories are discriminated (bone, fat, muscle-like, and tumor). For the head and neck region, more tissues have been shown to be required for good prediction accuracy. Delineating is a labor-intensive and difficult process. Hence, it is important to find the optimum between accuracy and labor, but for deep pelvic hyperthermia, there are no published studies showing the impact of the number of tissues. We studied the trade-off between the segmentation detail needed and segmentation feasibility. Our findings indicate that including high water content tissues can impact simulation accuracy. Although our results, in general, underline the suitability of our current clinical protocol, they help to prioritize improvements for specific cases.

Abstract

In hyperthermia, the general opinion is that pre-treatment optimization of treatment settings requires a patient-specific model. For deep pelvic hyperthermia treatment planning (HTP), tissue models comprising four tissue categories are currently discriminated. For head and neck HTP, we found that more tissues are required for increasing accuracy. In this work, we evaluated the impact of the number of segmented tissues on the predicted specific absorption rate (SAR) for the pelvic region. Highly detailed anatomical models of five healthy volunteers were selected from a virtual database. For each model, seven lists with varying levels of segmentation detail were defined and used as an input for a modeling study. SAR changes were quantified using the change in target-to-hotspot-quotient and maximum SAR relative differences, with respect to the most detailed patient model. The main finding of this study was that the inclusion of high water content tissues in the segmentation may result in a clinically relevant impact on the SAR distribution and on the predicted hyperthermia treatment quality when considering our pre-established thresholds. In general, our results underline the current clinical segmentation protocol and help to prioritize any improvements.