Biliary complications and efficacy after ablation of peribiliary tumors using irreversible electroporation (IRE) or radiofrequency ablation (RFA)

Non-Operating Room Anesthesia (NORA) for Ultrasound-Guided Liver Radiofrequency Ablation

INTRODUCTION

Percutaneous ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a well-studied treatment option for locally non-advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs). Sedation is of crucial interest as it enables safe and pain-free procedures. Whether the type of sedation has an impact on procedural outcome is still not well investigated.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected data on patients undergoing liver RFA for various oncological conditions. Procedures were conducted in a non-operating room anesthesia (NORA) setting. Procedural-related complications and short-term oncological outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients (mean age 71.5 y, 80% male) were treated for HCC (26), CRLM (6) and gastric cancer metastases (3). Mean lesion size was 21 mm (SD ± 10.1 mm), and the most common tumor localization was the right hepatic lobe. RFA was performed in a step-up sedation approach, with subcutaneous lidocaine injection prior to needle placement and subsequent deep sedation during ablation. No anesthesia-related early or late complications occurred. One patient presented with pleural effusion due to a large ablation zone and was treated conservatively. Local tumor-free survival after 1 and 6 months was 100% in all cases where a curative RFA approach was intended.

CONCLUSIONS

NORA for liver RFA comes with high patient acceptance and tolerance, and optimal postoperative outcomes and oncologic results.

Thermal ablation for hepatic tumors in high-risk locations

Thermal ablative techniques such as radiofrequency and microwave ablation are minimally invasive and cost-effective approaches that are currently being adopted as alternatives to surgical resection for primary and metastatic liver malignancies. However, they are considered to be relatively contraindicated for tumors in high-risk locations due to technical difficulties and a perceived increased risk of perioperative complications. Several techniques, including artificial ascites, non-touch multibipolar ablation, and laparoscopically assisted ablation, can be used to improve the outcomes of ablation for high-risk tumors. This review aims to provide a comprehensive summary of the techniques currently used to improve thermal ablation outcomes for high-risk liver tumors.

Percutaneous transhepatic cholangial drainage/percutaneous transhepatic biliary stent implantation for treatment of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with obstructive jaundice

Extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is a malignant tumor originating from the extrahepatic bile duct including the hilar region to the lower bile duct of the common bile duct. With the development of interventional techniques and medical materials, percutaneous transhepatic cholangial drainage (PTCD) or percutaneous transhepatic biliary stent implantation (PTBS) has become the main treatment to relieve biliary obstruction. However, the occurrence of postoperative complications seriously affects the prognosis of patients, and the combination of biliary stenting with local treatment has been found to significantly prolong the time to biliary patency. This article reviews the progress of PTCD/PTBS in the treatment of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with obstructive jaundice, evaluates its clinical efficacy, and points out the current problems and posible solutions to provide more reference for subsequent related studies.

Prevention of major biliary complications by fusion imaging for thermal ablation of malignant liver tumors adjacent to the bile ducts: a preliminary comparative study

PURPOSE

Ultrasound (US)-guided thermal ablation (TA) may cause major biliary complications, particularly in patients with malignant liver tumors (MLTs) adjacent to the bile ducts. Fusion imaging (FI), is postulated to reduce complication rate; however, there is a lack of clinical data to support this theory. Thus, the aim of our study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of FI for TA of MLTs proximal to the bile ducts.

METHODS

A retrospective single-center review was conducted on a total of 289 patients with 316 MLTs adjacent to the bile ducts. The patients were divided into two groups based on whether FI was used in the ablation procedures. The choice of the FI-assisted procedure always depends on different operation periods and whether registrations will succeed. The baseline demographics and outcomes of these patients were compared. The efficacy was determined at the 1-month follow-up using contrast-enhanced computed tomography/magnetic resonance. Biliary complications and local tumor progression were subsequently followed-up every 3-6 months. The last follow-up visit was before August 30, 2019.

RESULTS

Among the included tumors, the incidence rate of major biliary complications after ablation in the FI group was 1.6%, which was significantly lower than that in the non-FI group (7.9%, p = 0.005). There was no significant difference in the efficacy rates of the techniques [99.5% (185/186) versus 98.4% (123/125), p = 0.56] or local progression rates [3.8% (7/185) versus 5.7% (7/123), p = 0.61] between the FI and non-FI groups.

CONCLUSION

FI for US-guided TA could be a noninvasive means to decrease major biliary complications. Trial registration number and date of registration: retrospectively registered.