Decompressive surgery for acute subdural haematoma leading to contralateral extradural haematoma: a report of two casesand review of literature

Radiological prediction of contralateral extradural haematoma following evacuation of traumatic acute subdural haematoma

OBJECTIVES

To identify radiological predictors of contralateral extradural haematoma (CEDH) in patients undergoing evacuation of acute subdural haematoma (ASDH).

DESIGN

Retrospective case-control study.

SUBJECTS

Patients requiring evacuation of traumatic ASDH via craniotomy/craniectomy with contralateral skull fracture were analysed in two groups: those who developed CEDH postoperatively and those who did not.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective analysis of severe traumatic brain injury admissions over 24 months (2017-2019) at a major trauma centre. Pre- and post-operative CT scans were reviewed by a Consultant Neuroradiologist for initial fracture haematoma (FH) and specific contralateral skull fracture features (CLFF) comprising: complex petrous fracture, suture diastasis and fractures involving foramen spinosum or middle meningeal groove (MMG).

RESULTS

35 patients had ASDH evacuation (age: 11-74); 7 with craniotomy, 28 with craniectomy. 9/35 developed CEDH of whom 7 underwent bilateral craniotomy/craniectomy. 8/9 with CEDH had FH, 6/26 of those without CEDH had FH. All patients with CEDH had CLFF. 6/9 had >1 CLFF. CLFF was identified in 9/26 patients without CEDH and only 3/26 non-CEDH had >1 CLFF. Analysis using univariate logistic regression identified statistically significant factors for the development of CEDH which were: younger age, FH on initial CT, increasing number of CLFF and MMG involvement alone. After multivariate analysis, only younger age and FH were significant.

CONCLUSIONS

FH and CLFF on CT enable prediction of CEDH in patients undergoing evacuation of traumatic ASDH. These features raise a high index of suspicion for this complication and may expedite investigation and management for CEDH.

Outcomes of Repeat Surgery in Pediatric Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: An Analysis from Approaches and Decisions in Acute Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury Trial

BACKGROUND

Early operative intervention, craniotomy, and/or craniectomy are occasionally warranted in severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). Persistent increased intracranial pressure or accumulation of intracranial hematoma postsurgery can result in higher mortality and morbidity. There is a gap in information regarding the outcome of repeat surgery (RS) in pediatric patients with severe TBI.

METHODS

An observational cohort study titled Approaches and Decisions in Acute Pediatric TBI Trial data was obtained from the Federal Interagency Traumatic Brain Injury Research Informatics System. All pediatric patients who underwent craniotomy or decompressive craniectomy, survived more than 44 hours and were found to have persistent elevated intracranial pressure >20 mmHg for 2 consecutive hours were included in the study. The purpose of the study was to find the outcomes of RS in pediatric severe TBI. Propensity based matching was used to find the outcomes. The primary outcome was 60-day mortality.

RESULTS

Out of 1000 total patients enrolled in the Approaches and Decisions in Acute Pediatric Trial, 160 patients qualified for this study. Propensity score matching created 13 pairs of patients. There were no significant differences found between the groups who had RS versus those who did not have repeat surgery on baseline characteristics. There were no significant differences found between the groups regarding 60-day mortality, median hospital days, median intensive care unit days, and 6-month favorable outcome on Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended score.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no difference in mortality between patients who underwent a second surgery and patients who did not have to undergo a second surgery.

Endoscopic-assisted removal of bilateral traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage: A case report

Background

Decompressive craniectomy or craniotomy is an effective method for reducing intracranial pressure in patients with traumatic brain injury. However, contralateral intracranial hematoma is a rare but serious complication. Recently, the endoscopic technique has been described as a minimally invasive, safe, and effective treatment for intracranial hematoma evacuation. To the best of our knowledge, no technical report has described bilateral traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage (TICH) evacuation using a neuroendoscope.

Case Description

A 62-year-old man was admitted to the hospital after a fall due to intoxication. His initial Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score was 14. Initial computed tomography (CT) revealed a right temporal skull fracture, bilateral frontal and right temporal tip contusions, and acute subdural hematoma. During admission, his condition deteriorated to a GCS score of 6 points, and follow-up CT showed hemorrhagic progression of left frontal and right temporal contusion with midline shift and brainstem compression. Emergency surgery was performed for TICH in the left frontal lobe and right temporal lobe. A burr hole was made in each of the left frontal and right temporal regions, and we used a neuroendoscope to assist in the evacuation of the hematoma. Postoperative CT showed adequate evacuation of the hematoma. The patient regained consciousness and was discharged after 2 months.

Conclusion

Bilateral TICH was rapidly and sequentially removed by burr-hole craniotomy and endoscopic hematoma evacuation without rapid decompression by craniotomy. The hematoma did not increase. This report demonstrates that the endoscopic-assisted technique allows the safe treatment of bilateral TICH.

Risk Factors for Postoperative Contralateral Hemorrhage in Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury who Underwent Surgical Treatment: A Multicenter Study

Objective

Patients with a contralateral intracranial hemorrhage after decompressive craniectomy have a worse prognosis than those whose recovery is uneventful. Therefore, the objective of this study was to identify risk factors for postoperative contralateral hemorrhage (PCH) in patients who underwent unilateral craniectomy or craniotomy due to a traumatic brain injury (TBI).

Methods

Data were obtained from the Korean Neuro-Trauma Data Bank System and retrospectively reviewed. Patients who had a unilateral craniectomy or craniotomy for acute TBI were included in this study. Clinical outcomes of a PCH group and an uneventful group were compared and the risk factors for PCH were identified using regression analysis.

Results

A total of 326 patients were included in this study. PCH was observed in 25 (7.7%) patients. The Glasgow coma scale (GCS) and Glasgow outcome scale extended (GOSE) scores at discharge were significantly lower in the PCH group than those in the uneventful group (GCS: 3.6 vs. 6.2, p=0.043; GOSE: 2.1 vs. 3.2, p=0.032). In the multivariable regression analysis, when the time from injury to surgery was shorter than 150 minutes, the risk of PCH was increased by 4.481 times (p=0.005). When the intraoperative transfusion volume was more than 1.5 L, the risk of PCH was increased by 4.843 times (p=0.003).

Conclusion

The risk of PCH is increased when the time from injury to surgery is shorter than 150 minutes and when the intraoperative transfusion volume is greater than 1.5 L. Neurosurgeons must predict and be prepared for the development of PCH in high-risk patients.

Risk factors associated with the progression of extra-axial hematoma in the original frontotemporoparietal site after contralateral decompressive surgery in traumatic brain injury patients

PURPOSE

To introduced our experience with progressive extra-axial hematoma (EAH) in the original frontotemporoparietal (FTP) site after contralateral decompressive surgery (CDS) in traumatic brain injury patients and discuss the risk factors associated with this dangerous situation.

METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted on 941 patients with moderate or severe TBI treated in Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China in a period over 5 years (2013-2017). Only patients with bilateral lesion, the contralateral side being the dominant lesion, and decompressive surgery on the contralateral side conducted firstly were included. Patients were exclude if (1) they underwent bilateral decompression or neurosurgery at the original location firstly; (2) although surgery was performed first on the contralateral side, surgery was done again at the contralateral side due to re-bleeding or complications; (3) patients younger than 18 years or older than 80 years; and (4) patients with other significant organ injury or severe disorder or those with abnormal coagulation profiles. Clinical and radiographic variables reviewed were demographic data, trauma mechanisms, neurological condition assessed by Glasgow coma scale (GCS) score at admission, pupil size and reactivity, use of mannitol, time interval from trauma to surgery, Rotterdam CT classification, type and volume of EAH, presence of a skull fracture overlying the EAH, status of basal cistern, size of midline shift, associated brain lesions and types, etc. Patients were followed-up for at least 6 months and the outcome was graded by Glasgow outcome scale (GOS) score as favorable (scores of 4-5) and unfavorable (scores of 1-3). Student's t-test was adopted for quantitative variables while Pearson Chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was also applied to estimate the significance of risk factors.

RESULTS

Initially 186 patients (19.8%) with original impact locations at the FTP site and underwent surgery were selected. Among them, 66 met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. But only 50 patients were included because the data of the other 16 patients were incomplete. Progressive EAH developed at the original FTP site in 11 patients after the treatment of, with an incidence of 22%. Therefore the other 39 patients were classified as the control group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that both the volume of the original hematoma and the absence of an apparent midline shift were significant predictors of hematoma progression after decompressive surgery. Patients with fracture at the original impact site had a higher incidence of progressive EAH after CDS, however this factor was not an important predictor in the multivariate model. We also found that patients with progressive EAH had a similar favorable outcome with control group.

CONCLUSION

Progressive EAH is correlated with several variables, such as hematoma volumes ≥10 mL at the original impact location and the absence of an apparent midline shift (<5 mm). Although progressive EAH is devastating, timely diagnosis with computed tomography scans and immediate evacuation of the progressive hematoma can yield a favorable result.

Repeat Surgery After Decompressive Craniectomy for Traumatic Intracranial Hemorrhage: Outcomes and Predictors

INTRODUCTION

Repeat surgery (RS) after decompressive craniectomy/craniotomy (DC) for traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (TICH) is a devastating complication. In patients undergoing DC for TICH, we sought to 1) describe the population requiring RS, 2) compare outcomes of those requiring RS with those who did not, and 3) discern RS predictors.

METHODS

A single-institution retrospective case-control study was conducted from 2000 to 2015. Inclusion criteria were DC for acute supratentorial TICH (subdural hemorrhage, epidural hemorrhage, and intraparenchymal hemorrhage) and ≥7 day survival. Patients underwent RS within 7 days of DC; controls did not require RS. Outcomes and predictors of RS were evaluated with univariate and multivariate logistic regression (MLR).

RESULTS

Of 201 patients requiring DC, 28 (14%) underwent RS. Common mechanisms were ground-level fall (45%) and motor vehicle collision (29%). Anticoagulation/antiplatelet medication was used by 44 patients (21%). Subdural hemorrhage was the most common hemorrhage (64%). Using MLR, those requiring RS were more likely to experience major complications (odds ratio [OR], 22.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.06-101.35; P < 0.001) and in-hospital mortality (OR, 2.76; 95% CI, 1.02-7.43; P = 0.045) and be dead/dependent at 6 months (OR, 2.50; 95% CI, 1.08-5.82; P = 0.033) and 2 years (OR, 2.44; 95% CI, 0.99-6.00; P = 0.051). Predictors of undergoing RS identified by MLR were smaller hemorrhage (OR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.13-0.78; P = 0.012), larger midline shift (OR, 4.40; 95% CI, 1.43-13.51; P = 0.010), and better preoperative Glasgow Coma Scale score (OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.13-1.46; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients requiring RS after DC represent a heterogenous population with worse outcomes. Although the identified risk factors for RS are not modifiable, surgeons should be aware of these factors during the initial surgery.

Extradural Hematoma Following Decompressive Craniectomy for Acute Subdural Hematoma: Two Case Reports Illustrating Different Mechanisms

The occurrence of extradural hematoma (EDH) after decompressive craniectomy (DC) for traumatic brain injury is uncommon. We report two cases, one developing ipsilateral EDH and another developing contralateral simultaneous EDH and subdural hematoma after DC. The strategies to anticipate the occurrence of such concurrent hematomas (CH) are highlighted. We propose a subclassification of CH into “immediate” and “delayed,” based on their difference in clinical presentation, image findings, pathogenesis, and surgical management.

Unusual, Acute, and Delayed Traumatic Torcular Herophili Epidural Hematoma Causing Malignant Encephalocele During Surgery: A Case Report

Patient: Male, 40

Final Diagnosis: Traumatic torcular herophili unusual acute and delayed epidural hematoma

Symptoms: Coma

Medication: —

Clinical Procedure: Craniotomy

Specialty: Neurosurgery

Two occurrences of delayed epidural hematoma in different areas following decompressive craniectomy for acute subdural hematoma in a single patient: a case report

BACKGROUND

Delayed epidural hematoma (DEH) following evacuation of traumatic acute subdural hematoma (ASDH) or acute epidural hematoma (EDH) is a rare but devastating complication, especially when it occurs sequentially in a single patient.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 19-year-old man who developed contralateral DEH following craniotomy for evacuation of a traumatic right-side ASDH and then developed a left-side DEH of the posterior cranial fossa after craniotomy for evacuation of the contralateral DEH. He was immediately returned to the operating room for additional surgeries and his neurological outcome was satisfactory.

CONCLUSIONS

Although DEH occurring after evacuation of ASDH or acute EDH is a rare event, timely recognition is critical to prognosis.

Postoperative Contralateral Hematoma in Patient with Acute Traumatic Brain Injury

Objective

Head injury is a leading cause of death and disability in subjects who suffer a traumatic accident. Contralateral hematomas after surgery for traumatic brain injury are rare. However, an unrecognized, these hematomas can cause devastating results. We presented our experience of these patients and discussed diagnosis and management.

Methods

This study included 12 traumatic patients with acute traumatic brain injury who developed delayed contralateral hematoma after evacuation of an acute hematoma. Clinical and radiographic data was obtained through review of medical records and radiographs retrospectively.

Results

Ten males and two females were included in the study. Ten (83.3%) patients had severe head injury (Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] score <8). Intraoperative brain swelling during removal of the traumatic subdural hematoma was noted in 10 (83.3%) patients. A skull fracture on the side contralateral to the acute hematoma was noted on computed tomography (CT) scans of nine (75%) patients. Three (33.3%) patients with severe head injury (GCS <8) died. Only (10%) one patient with a severe head injury had less severe disability.

Conclusion

A postoperative CT scan is essential in patients with acute traumatic brain injury and a contralateral skull fracture or a low GCS score. Our results indicated that it is very important to evaluate this rare but potentially devastating complication.

The Clinical Value of Intraoperative Mobile Computed Tomography in Managing High-Risk Surgical Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury-A Single Tertiary Trauma Center Experience

OBJECTIVE

A subset of surgically treated patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) cannot be stabilized by initial surgery. Mobile computed tomography (CT) provides real-time information for diagnosis in these TBI surgically high-risk (TBI-SHR) patients. The objective of this study was to analyze a 5-year series of TBI-SHR patients to evaluate the impact of intraoperative mobile CT (imCT) on prognosis.

METHODS

Of 1017 surgically treated patients with TBI retrospectively reviewed over a 5-year period (2009-2013), 59 patients required second operations within 72 hours of their initial surgery because of progressive or delayed hematomas (TBI-SHR group). Their clinical, radiographic, and intraoperative findings were compared among 19 patients who received imCT versus 40 patients who received fixed-unit CT.

RESULTS

Our TBI-SHR group accounted for 5.8% of all surgically treated patients with TBI. The use of imCT led to a change in surgical plan in 56% of patients with TBI intraoperatively. Younger patients (≤55 years; P < 0.05) with multifocal hemorrhage on preoperative CT (P = 0.033) and with an intraoperative unexpected event such as intraoperative intracranial pressure >20 mm Hg or acute brain swelling after adequate decompression (P = 0.003 and 0.004, respectively) significantly benefited from imCT in the TBI-SHR group. imCT also provided a quicker diagnosis (P < 0.001), led to a trend toward shorter intensive care unit stays (P = 0.077), and was associated with better neurologic outcomes at discharge days (P = 0.044).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of imCT is associated with better neurologic outcomes at discharge days compared with the use of fixed-unit CT in TBI-SHR patients.

Image Quality Required for the Diagnosis of Skull Fractures Using Head CT: A Comparison of Conventional and Improved Reconstruction Kernels

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Although skull fractures are generally assessed on bone images obtained by using head CT, the combined multikernel technique that enables evaluation of both brain and bone through a change in the window settings of an image set has been reported. The purpose of this retrospective study was to determine the image quality required for the accurate assessment of skull fractures by using head CT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A random sample of 50 patients (25 nonfracture and 25 simple nondisplaced skull fractures) was selected, and sets of conventional brain and bone images and improved combined multikernel images were reconstructed (4614 images). Three radiologists indicated their confidence levels regarding the presence of skull fractures by marking on a continuous scale for each image set. The mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was calculated for each kernel, and the statistical significance of differences was tested by using the Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz method.

RESULTS

Although a difference in the diagnostic performance of the 3 radiologists was suggested, the mean area under the curve value showed no significant differences among the 3 reconstruction kernels (P = .95 [bone versus combined]), P = .91 [bone versus brain]), and P = .88 [brain versus combined]). However, the quality of brain images was distinctly poorer than the quality of the other 2 images.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no significant difference in the diagnostic performance of brain, bone, and combined multikernel images for skull fractures. Skull fracture diagnosis is made possible by brain image assessments. Combined multikernel images offer the advantage of high-quality brain and bone images.

Serial Attacks: Contralateral Hematoma Secondary to Decompressive Craniectomy for Traumatic Brain Injury Led to Posttraumatic Cerebral Infarction

A 40-year-old man suffered severe brain injury and received left side subdural hematoma evacuation with decompressive craniectomy. Intraoperative brain swelling had occurred during the surgery. Postoperative computed tomography (CT) scan was done immediately and showed a contralateral epidural hematoma resulting in herniation. Secondary hematoma evacuation was performed and found a linear fracture near a bleeding meningeal artery. 2 days later CT scan showed cerebral infarction mainly in right posterior cerebral artery distribution. Early diagnosis by postoperative CT scan or other potential ways such as intraoperative sonography is important to prompt treatments and interrupt the pathophysiological chain of the serial attacks.

Intraoperative contralateral extradural hematoma during evacuation of traumatic acute extradural hematoma

Introduction: Extradural hematomas (EDHs) accounts for approximately 2% of patients following head trauma and 5-15% of patients with fatal head injuries. When indicated, the standard surgical management consists of evacuation of the hematoma via craniotomy. Intraoperative development of acute extradural hematoma (AEDH) on the contralateral side following evacuation of acute extradural hematoma is uncommon and very few cases have been reported.

Case report: We report a case of 28 year-old-male who suffered from a severe head injury following assault and diagnosed as acute extradural hematoma over right fronto-parietal region with midline shift towards left. Patient underwent emergency craniotomy with acute EDH evacuation. Following evacuation of acute EDH the duramater was tense which was unusual finding. With anticipation of underling acute SDH small durotomy was done, but there were no sub dural hematoma. Bone flap were repositioned and closure were done. Patient was shifted for NCCT head from OT, which revealed 2.7cm acute EDH over left frantoparietal region. Patient was again shifted back to OT and left frontoparietal craniotomy with evacuation of hematoma was done. Postoperative NCCT head was satisfactory. However, the patient remained severely disabled.

Conclusion: Formation of contralateral EDH after AEDH surgery is a rare but potentially dangerous complication. A high degree of suspicion should be kept for contralateral extradural hematoma if during surgery there is tense duramater following AEDH evacuation. We would advise urgent NCCT head especially if a fracture is demonstrated on the preoperative CT scan on contralateral side. This would save some invaluable time, which may help in changing the outcome in some of the patients.

Simultaneous cranioplasty and subdural-peritoneal shunting for contralateral symptomatic subdural hygroma following decompressive craniectomy

BACKGROUND

Contralateral subdural hygroma caused by decompressive craniectomy tends to combine with external cerebral herniation, causing neurological deficits.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Nine patients who underwent one-stage, simultaneous cranioplasty and contralateral subdural-peritoneal shunting were included in this study. Clinical outcome was assessed by Glasgow Outcome Scale as well as Glasgow Coma Scale, muscle power scoring system, and complications.

RESULTS

Postoperative computed tomography scans demonstrated completely resolved subdural hygroma and reversed midline shifts, indicating excellent outcome. Among these 9 patients, 4 patients (44%) had improved GOS following the proposed surgery. Four out of 4 patients with lethargy became alert and orientated following surgical intervention. Muscle strength improved significantly 5 months after surgery in 7 out of 7 patients with weakness. Two out of 9 patients presented with drowsiness due to hydrocephalus at an average time of 65 days after surgery. Double gradient shunting is useful to eliminate the respective hydrocephalus and contralateral subdural hygroma.

CONCLUSION

The described surgical technique is effective in treating symptomatic contralateral subdural hygroma following decompressive craniectomy and is associated with an excellent structural and functional outcome. However, subdural-peritoneal shunting plus cranioplasty thoroughly resolves the subdural hygroma collection, which might deteriorate the cerebrospinal fluid circulation, leading to hydrocephalus.

Calvarial fracture patterns on CT imaging predict risk of a delayed epidural hematoma following decompressive craniectomy for traumatic brain injury

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The development of a delayed epidural hematoma as a result of decompressive craniectomy represents an urgent and potentially lethal complication in traumatic brain injury. The goal of this study was to determine the incidence of delayed epidural hematoma and whether patterns of skull fractures on the preoperative CT scan could predict risk of a delayed epidural hematoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated medical records and imaging studies for patients with acute traumatic brain injury who underwent a decompressive craniectomy during a 9-year period. We compared patterns of skull fractures contralateral to the side of the craniectomy with the occurrence of a postoperative delayed epidural hematoma.

RESULTS

In a series of 203 patients undergoing decompressive craniectomy for acute traumatic brain injury, the incidence of a delayed epidural hematoma complication was 6% (12 of 203). All 12 patients who developed a delayed epidural hematoma had a contralateral calvarial fracture on preoperative CT at the site where the delayed epidural hematoma subsequently formed. A contralateral calvarial fracture has perfect sensitivity (100%) for subsequent development of delayed epidural hematoma in our study population. Moreover, a contralateral calvarial fracture involving 2 or more bone plates had an especially high diagnostic odds ratio of 41 for delayed epidural hematoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Recognition of skull fracture patterns associated with delayed epidural hematoma following decompressive craniectomy may reduce morbidity and mortality by prompting early postoperative intervention in high-risk situations.

Contralateral extradural hematoma following decompressive craniectomy for acute subdural hematoma (the value of intracranial pressure monitoring): a case report

Introduction

Decompressive surgery for acute subdural hematoma leading to contralateral extradural hematoma is an uncommon event with only few cases previously reported in the English medical literature.

Case presentation

The present study describes the case of a 39-year-old White Brazilian man who had a motorcycle accident; he underwent decompressive craniectomy for the treatment of acute subdural hematoma and evolved contralateral extradural hematoma following surgery.

Conclusion

The present case highlights the importance of close monitoring of the intracranial pressure of severe traumatic brain injury, even after decompressive procedures, because of the possible development of contralateral extradural hematoma.

Contralateral acute subdural hematoma following traumatic acute subdural hematoma evacuation

Contralateral acute subdural hematoma (ASDH) occurring after removal of traumatic ASDH is a rare, but nearly devastating postoperative complication. We treated a 26-year-old male who developed a contralateral ASDH shortly after craniectomy for evacuation of a traumatic ASDH. Burr-hole craniotomy was performed before decompressive craniectomy, and the bleeding source was a cortex artery within the frontal lobe contusion. Despite supportive therapy with barbiturate and mild hypothermia he expired 3 days later of brain death. Literature review suggests that the old are more susceptible to contralateral ASDH following evacuation of traumatic ASDH. Contralateral ASDH following evacuation of traumatic ASDH is a rare but potentially lethal complication, so neurosurgeons should try to detect such contralateral hematoma formation and prevent clinical deterioration.

Contralateral delayed epidural hematoma following intracerebral hematoma surgery

BACKGROUND

Delayed epidural hematoma (EDH) is an uncommon finding in patients after intracranial hematomas evacuation. It occurs in 6.7-7.4% of cases. A total of 29 reports were found in literature. Between them were no cases of delayed contralateral EDH after intracerebral hematoma evacuation.

CASE DESCRIPTION

This paper represents a clinical case of a 28-year-old male patient with opened penetrating head injury, who underwent left frontal lobe intracerebral hematoma evacuation and one day later a contralateral EDH was found and successfully surgically treated.

CONCLUSION

Contralateral EDH is a life-threatening neurosurgical emergency case, which can occur during first 24 hours after decompressive craniectomy. Control CT scans must be performed next day after the operation to verify and treat contralateral EDH timely.

Novel method for emergency craniostomy for rapid control and monitoring of the intracranial pressure in severe acute subdural hematoma

Acute subdural hematoma (ASDH) is a critical condition following the onset of traumatic brain injury, and it is essential to immediately reduce elevated intracranial pressure (ICP). Single burr hole surgery/twist drill craniostomy is commonly performed in patients with ASDH as an emergency surgical intervention, usually preceding decompressive craniotomy. A novel method using a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage catheter kit for rapid drainage of ASDH is described. Percutaneous twist drill craniostomy using a CAMINO(®) micro ventricular bolt pressure-temperature monitoring kit was performed in the emergency room in 12 patients with severe ASDH. The kit contained a closed-system CSF drainage and pressure-temperature monitoring catheter, which allowed aspiration of the hematoma and monitoring of the ICP. The tip of the catheter was inserted into the hematoma from the forehead. The mean initial ICP was 61 mmHg, with a range of 31 to 120 mmHg. The liquid hematoma was aspirated, and the ICP was temporarily controlled to the normal range. Pupil dilation recovered immediately after aspiration of the hematoma in 3 patients. No complications occurred either during or after the operation. This new method for craniostomy is easy, safe, and effective to monitor and rapidly control ICP in the emergency room. This technique also offers the possibility of evaluating the patient's prognosis and determining indications for further decompressive craniectomy by the continuation of ICP control under ICP monitoring and evaluation of the reversibility of pupillary findings in ASDH patients.

Contralateral extraaxial hematomas after urgent neurosurgery of a mass lesion in patients with traumatic brain injury

PURPOSE

The development of a contralateral extraaxial hematoma has repeatedly been described in small series and descriptive studies. However, the evidence available to date is limited.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the incidence and risk factors leading to the development of a contralateral extraaxial hematoma and to describe the characteristics of cases.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study with prospective data collection was undertaken. All patients admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) from 2006 to 2010 were studied. The inclusion criteria were as follows: severe trauma [Injury Severity Score (ISS ≥ 16)], neurosurgery (NeuroSx) in the first 24 h. The following were excluded: subacute/chronic subdural hematomas, first bilateral NeuroSx. Cases were those who required immediate contralateral NeuroSx after the first NeuroSx due to the occurrence of a new extraaxial injury or significant growth of a previous one. Controls were those patients those who did not require second NeuroSx or who required reoperation due to ipsilateral lesions. The variables considered were: demographics, neurological assessment, traumatic injuries and severity, image and surgical findings, clinical course, and outcome. Statistics analysis comprised descriptive, inferential, and multivariate analysis by logistic regression.

RESULTS

A total of 120 patients were included, among which there were 11 cases (incidence 9.2 %). The cases showed a significantly higher frequency of coma or severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) at admission, contralateral injury and contralateral skull fracture in the preoperative computed tomography (CT) scan, as well as decompressive craniectomy. There were no significant differences in the severity scores, clinical course, or outcomes. The presence of contralateral fracture was identified as an independent risk factor [relative risk (RR) 47.9, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 5.2-443].

CONCLUSIONS

Contralateral extraaxial hematoma is a rare entity, although it has a high mortality rate. Therefore, it requires a high index of suspicion, especially in patients with severe TBI, with minimal contralateral injury and mainly with contralateral skull fracture on the initial CT scan.

Surgery for contralateral acute epidural hematoma following acute subdural hematoma evacuation: five new cases and a short literature review

BACKGROUND

The occurrence of a contralateral acute epidural hematoma (AEDH) following removal of an acute subdural hematoma (ASDH) is a rare but nearly devastating postoperative complication. Here, we describe a series of five patients with contralateral AEDH and provide a review of the literature to elucidate the characteristics and improve management of these patients.

METHODS

A total of 386 patients underwent ASDH evacuations in our hospital between August 2008 and July 2011. Five of these patients (1.3 %) developed AEDH that required surgery. Thirty-two additional patients were identified by a search of the PubMed database. Clinical features, surgical treatment, and outcomes (scored by Glasgow outcome scale, GOS) of the collective 37 AEDH cases were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Contralateral AEDH after ASDH evacuation occurred in 27 males (73 %) and 10 females (27 %) (mean age: 35.9 ± 14.2 years). Twenty-six patients (70 %) had unfavorable outcomes (GOS 1-3), and 11 patients (30 %) had favorable outcomes (GOS 4-5). Contralateral skull fractures and intraoperative acute brain swelling occurred in 30 (81 %) and 28 (76 %) patients, respectively. The preoperative Glasgow coma score (GCS) was significantly associated with outcome (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Lower preoperative GCS score is an independent risk factor for prognosis of contralateral AEDH after ASDH. Postoperative management should include assessment of AEDH in patients treated for contralateral skull fractures and who experienced intraoperative acute brain swelling. We recommend early decompression with a burr-hole craniotomy, immediately followed by a decompressive craniectomy. This strategy provides gradual decompression, while advancing the initial surgical time and preventing the suddle decreased tamponade effect. As such, it may help decrease the risk of contralateral AEDH associated with decompression.

Progressive epidural hematoma in patients with head trauma: incidence, outcome, and risk factors

Progressive epidural hematoma (PEDH) after head injury is often observed on serial computerized tomography (CT) scans. Recent advances in imaging modalities and treatment might affect its incidence and outcome. In this study, PEDH was observed in 9.2% of 412 head trauma patients in whom two CT scans were obtained within 24 hours of injury, and in a majority of cases, it developed within 3 days after injury. In multivariate logistic regression, patient gender, age, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score at admission, and skull fracture were not associated with PEDH, whereas hypotension (odds ratio (OR) 0.38, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.17-0.84), time interval of the first CT scanning (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.19-0.83), coagulopathy (OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.15-0.85), or decompressive craniectomy (DC) (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.21-0.97) was independently associated with an increased risk of PEDH. The 3-month postinjury outcome was similar in patients with PEDH and patients without PEDH (χ(2) = 0.07, P = 0.86). In conclusion, epidural hematoma has a greater tendency to progress early after injury, often in dramatic and rapid fashion. Recognition of this important treatable cause of secondary brain injury and the associated risk factors may help identify the group at risk and tailor management of patients with TBI.

Contralateral subdural effusion related to decompressive craniectomy performed in patients with severe traumatic brain injury

BACKGROUND

Contralateral subdural effusion caused by decompressive craniectomy (DC) is not uncommon. However, it has rarely been reported.

METHOD

From 2004 to 2008, 123 severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients were identified as having undergone DC for increased intracranial pressure (IICP) with or without removal of a blood clot or contused brain. Of these 123 patients, nine developed delayed contralateral subdural effusion. Demographics, clinical presentations, treatment and outcome were reported.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of contralateral subdural effusion was 7.3%. On average, this complication was found 23 days after DC. Of the nine patients, six had neurological deterioration and received drainage through a burr hole. One patient needed a subsequent subduro-peritoneal shunting because of recurrent subdural effusion.

CONCLUSION

Contralateral subdural effusions may be not uncommon and need more aggressive treatment because of their tendency to cause midline shift. Surgical intervention may be warranted if the patients develop deteriorating clinical manifestations or if the subdural effusion has an apparent mass effect.

Decompressive craniectomy – friend or foe?

Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is the surgical management removing part of the skull vault over a swollen brain used to treat elevated intracranial pressure that is unresponsive to maximal medical therapy. The commonest indication for DC is traumatic brain injury (TBI) or middle cerebral artery (MCA) infarction, though DC has been reported to have been used for treatment of aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage and venous infarction. Despite an increasing number of reports supportive of DC, the controversy over the suitability of the procedure and criteria for patient selection remains unresolved. Although the majority of published studies are retrospective, the recent publication of several randomised prospective studies prompts a re-evaluation of the use of DC. We review the literature concerning the pathophysiology, indication, surgical techniques and timing, complications and long-term effects of DC (including reversal with cranioplasty), in order to rationalise its use. We conclude that at the time of this review, though we cannot support the routine use of DC in TBI or MCA stroke, there is evidence that early and aggressive use of DC in TBI patients with intracranial haematomas or younger malignant MCA stroke patients may improve outcome. Though the results of the DECRA trial suggest that primary DC may worsen outcome, the decision to perform DC after diffuse TBI is still individualised. We await the results of the RESCUEicp trial to ascertain whether an evidence-based protocol for its use can be agreed in the future.

Immediate development of a contralateral acute subdural hematoma following acute subdural hematoma evacuation

Contralateral hematoma formation following acute subdural hematoma (ASDH) evacuation is a well-described complication. The most common type of contralateral hematoma is an epidural hematoma. Rarely, ASDH develops on the contralateral side. We report an elderly woman who presented with a post-traumatic ASDH and underwent ipsilateral hematoma evacuation by craniotomy and subsequently developed a contralateral ASDH. Because of the potential consequences of a delayed ASDH, there should be a low threshold for early post-operative imaging following ASDH evacuation, especially in elderly patients and those with additional associated intracranial injuries.

Prognosis for severe traumatic brain injury patients treated with bilateral decompressive craniectomy

PURPOSE

Decompressive craniectomy for traumatic brain injury patients has been shown to reduce intracranial hypertension, while it often results in increased brain edema and/or contralateral space-occupied hematoma. The purpose of this study was to determine the prognosis of bilateral decompressive craniectomy in severe head injury patients with the development of either bilateral or contralateral lesions after ipsilateral decompressive craniectomy.

METHODS

Twelve patients underwent bilateral decompressive craniectomy among 217 individuals who had been treated with decompressive craniectomy with dural expansion from September 1995 to August 2006. The following patient data were retrospectively collected: age, neurological status at admission, time between injury and surgical decompression, time between first and second decompression, laboratory and physiological data collected in the intensive care unit, and outcome according to the Glasgow Outcome Scale.

RESULTS

Patient outcomes fell into the following categories: good recovery (three patients); mild disability (one patient); severe disability (two patients); persistent vegetative state (one patient); and death (five patients). Patients with good outcomes were younger and had better pupil reactions and neurological statuses on admission. Other factors existing prior to the operation did not directly correlate with outcome. At 24 h post-surgery, the average intercranial pressure (ICP), cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP), glucose level, and lactate level in patients with poor outcomes differed significantly from those of patients with a good prognosis.

CONCLUSION

Head injury patients with either bilateral or contralateral lesions have poor prognosis. However, bilateral decompressive craniectomy may be a favorable treatment in certain younger patients with reactive pupils, whose ICP and CPP values are stabilized 24 h post-surgery.

Paediatric intracranial empyema: differences according to age

No recent studies are available which consider the epidemiology and outcome of paediatric intracranial empyema (PICE). We retrospectively studied all PICE cases admitted in our institution from 1993 to 2006. Outcome was assessed using the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) at 24 months. Aetiology, clinical features, therapeutic considerations and risk factors of poor outcome were analysed according to age. Data from 38 patients were studied; 33/38 presented with subdural empyema (SDE) and 5/38 with extradural empyema (EDE); 10/38 were infants <1 year of age with SDE, all related to bacterial meningitis; 28/38 were children, with 23/28 showing SDE and 5/28 EDE. Oto-sinogenic infections were the main causes in children. All infants recovered completely as did children with EDE. However, two out of 23 children with SDE had permanent neurological deficit, already detected on admission, and one out of 23 died. Thirty-three out of 38 were operated; 16 of which underwent multiple surgical procedure because of recurrence. Burr hole was performed in six infants and craniotomy in one, while 21/23 children underwent burr hole or craniotomy. Burr hole was more often associated with recurrence. In children with SDE, factors associated with poor outcome were neurological deficit (p = 0.002) and cerebral herniation on CT scan (p = 0.02) on admission. In this study, we gained further insights into modern epidemiology of PICE by highlighting age-related aetiology, symptoms, treatment strategy, and outcome differences. Meningitis was the main aetiology in the infants and sinusitis was prevalent in children. Finally, early diagnosis by neuro-imaging investigations and timely and appropriate multidisciplinary treatment may offer the best chance of recovery.

Delayed post-operative contralateral epidural hematoma in a patient with right-sided acute subdural hematoma: a case report

Head injury is one of the leading causes of death and disability in traumatic accidents. Post-operative contralateral epidural hematomas after surgery for acute subdural hematoma seem to be rare. In this case, expansion and spontaneous resolution of a fractural epidural hematoma contralateral to the side of acute subdural hematoma is presented. The importance of immediate post-operative computed tomography is also highlighted to detect delayed traumatic mass lesions.

Contralateral acute epidural hematoma after decompressive surgery of acute subdural hematoma: clinical features and outcome

BACKGROUND

Delayed contralateral epidural hematoma (EDH) after decompressive surgery for acute subdural hematoma (SDH) is uncommon. If unrecognized, this delayed hematoma can cause devastating consequences. We present our experience with this group of patients and discuss the diagnosis and management of this dangerous condition.

METHODS

This study included 12 traumatic patients with acute SDH who developed delayed contralateral EDH after acute SDH evacuation. Clinical and radiographic information was obtained through a retrospective review of the medical records and the radiographs.

RESULTS

There were seven males and five females. Nine patients had severe head injury (Glasgow Coma Scale {GCS} score < or = 8). Ten patients underwent acute SDH evacuation within 4 hours after the trauma. Intraoperative brain swelling during SDH evacuation was noted in 10 patients. A skull fracture at the site of the EDH on computed tomography (CT) was noted only in 10 patients. However, a skull fracture overlying the EDH was found during EDH evacuation in all patients. Only three patients with less severe head injury (GCS > 8) had good recovery. Other patients with severe head injury (GCS < or = 8) had poor outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Severe head injury, a skull fracture contralateral to the original hematoma, intraoperative brain protrusion, and a poor outcome are typical clinical findings in this disorder. In patients with acute SDH and a contralateral skull fracture, immediate postoperative CT scan is indicated to evaluate this rare but potentially lethal complication. According to the findings of the postoperative CT scan, the neurosurgeon can make an appropriate strategy of treatment promptly. Early detection and prompt treatment may improve the poor outcome in this group of patients.