1
|
Lin J, Kaiser Y, Wiestler B, Bernhardt D, Combs SE, Delbridge C, Meyer B, Gempt J, Aftahy AK. Cytoreduction of Residual Tumor Burden Is Decisive for Prolonged Survival in Patients with Recurrent Brain Metastases-Retrospective Analysis of 219 Patients. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5067. [PMID: 37894435 PMCID: PMC10605169 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15205067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2023] [Revised: 10/10/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite advances in treatment for brain metastases (BMs), the prognosis for recurrent BMs remains poor and requires further research to advance clinical management and improve patient outcomes. In particular, data addressing the impact of tumor volume and surgical resection with regard to survival remain scarce. METHODS Adult patients with recurrent BMs between December 2007 and December 2022 were analyzed. A distinction was made between operated and non-operated patients, and the residual tumor burden (RTB) was determined by using (postoperative) MRI. Survival analysis was performed and RTB cutoff values were calculated using maximally selected log-rank statistics. In addition, further analyses on systemic tumor progression and (postoperative) tumor therapy were conducted. RESULTS In total, 219 patients were included in the analysis. Median age was 60 years (IQR 52-69). Median preoperative tumor burden was 2.4 cm3 (IQR 0.8-8.3), and postoperative tumor burden was 0.5 cm3 (IQR 0.0-2.9). A total of 95 patients (43.4%) underwent surgery, and complete cytoreduction was achieved in 55 (25.1%) patients. Median overall survival was 6 months (IQR 2-10). Cutoff RTB in all patients was 0.12 cm3, showing a significant difference (p = 0.00029) in overall survival (OS). Multivariate analysis showed preoperative KPSS (HR 0.983, 95% CI, 0.967-0.997, p = 0.015), postoperative tumor burden (HR 1.03, 95% CI 1.008-1.053, p = 0.007), and complete vs. incomplete resection (HR 0.629, 95% CI 0.420-0.941, p = 0.024) as significant. Longer survival was significantly associated with surgery for recurrent BMs (p = 0.00097), and additional analysis demonstrated the significant effect of complete resection on survival (p = 0.0027). In the subgroup of patients with systemic progression, a cutoff RTB of 0.97 cm3 (p = 0.00068) was found; patients who had received surgery also showed prolonged OS (p = 0.036). Single systemic therapy (p = 0.048) and the combination of radiotherapy and systemic therapy had a significant influence on survival (p = 0.036). CONCLUSIONS RTB is a strong prognostic factor for survival in patients with recurrent BMs. Operated patients with recurrent BMs showed longer survival independent of systemic progression. Maximal cytoreduction should be targeted to achieve better long-term outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonas Lin
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Yannik Kaiser
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Benedikt Wiestler
- Department of Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Denise Bernhardt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, 80336 Munich, Germany
| | - Stephanie E. Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, 80336 Munich, Germany
- Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS) Helmholtz Zentrum Munich, Institute of Innovative Radiotherapy (iRT), 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Claire Delbridge
- Department of Neuropathology, Institute of Pathology, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Bernhard Meyer
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Jens Gempt
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Amir Kaywan Aftahy
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Diehl CD, Giordano FA, Grosu AL, Ille S, Kahl KH, Onken J, Rieken S, Sarria GR, Shiban E, Wagner A, Beck J, Brehmer S, Ganslandt O, Hamed M, Meyer B, Münter M, Raabe A, Rohde V, Schaller K, Schilling D, Schneider M, Sperk E, Thomé C, Vajkoczy P, Vatter H, Combs SE. Opportunities and Alternatives of Modern Radiation Oncology and Surgery for the Management of Resectable Brain Metastases. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3670. [PMID: 37509330 PMCID: PMC10377800 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15143670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2023] [Revised: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Postsurgical radiotherapy (RT) has been early proven to prevent local tumor recurrence, initially performed with whole brain RT (WBRT). Subsequent to disadvantageous cognitive sequalae for the patient and the broad distribution of modern linear accelerators, focal irradiation of the tumor has omitted WBRT in most cases. In many studies, the effectiveness of local RT of the resection cavity, either as single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or hypo-fractionated stereotactic RT (hFSRT), has been demonstrated to be effective and safe. However, whereas prospective high-level incidence is still lacking on which dose and fractionation scheme is the best choice for the patient, further ablative techniques have come into play. Neoadjuvant SRS (N-SRS) prior to resection combines straightforward target delineation with an accelerated post-surgical phase, allowing an earlier start of systemic treatment or rehabilitation as indicated. In addition, low-energy intraoperative RT (IORT) on the surgical bed has been introduced as another alternative to external beam RT, offering sterilization of the cavity surface with steep dose gradients towards the healthy brain. This consensus paper summarizes current local treatment strategies for resectable brain metastases regarding available data and patient-centered decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian D Diehl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, 81675 München, Germany
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, 80336 München, Germany
| | - Frank A Giordano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Anca-L Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center, Medical Faculty, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Ille
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, 81675 München, Germany
| | - Klaus-Henning Kahl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Augsburg, 86156 Augsburg, Germany
| | - Julia Onken
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan Rieken
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Göttingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Niedersachsen (CCC-N), 37075 Göttingen, Germany
| | - Gustavo R Sarria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Ehab Shiban
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Augsburg, 86156 Augsburg, Germany
| | - Arthur Wagner
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, 81675 München, Germany
| | - Jürgen Beck
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
| | - Stefanie Brehmer
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Oliver Ganslandt
- Neurosurgical Clinic, Klinikum Stuttgart, 70174 Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Motaz Hamed
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Bernhard Meyer
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, 81675 München, Germany
| | - Marc Münter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum Stuttgart Katharinenhospital, 70174 Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Andreas Raabe
- Department of Neurosurgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Veit Rohde
- Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany
| | - Karl Schaller
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Geneva Medical Center & Faculty of Medicine, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Daniela Schilling
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, 81675 München, Germany
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Matthias Schneider
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Elena Sperk
- Mannheim Cancer Center, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Claudius Thomé
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Peter Vajkoczy
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Hartmut Vatter
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, 81675 München, Germany
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, 80336 München, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Shahmohammadi M, Hajimohammadebrahim-Ketabforoush M, Shariatpanahi ZV. Optimal vitamin D status at admission appears to improve survival after craniotomy in patients with brain malignancies. Clin Nutr ESPEN 2023; 55:428-433. [PMID: 37202079 DOI: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2023.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2023] [Revised: 04/08/2023] [Accepted: 04/11/2023] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Survival from diagnosis of brain malignancies is often very short. Craniotomy in turn may be associated with morbidity and even post-operative mortality. Vitamin D and calcium were known as protective factors on all-cause mortality. However, their role is not well-understood in post-surgery survival of brain malignant patients. METHODS Totally, 56 patients completed the present quasi-experimental study, comprising the intervention group (n = 19) under intramuscular administration of 300 000 IU vitamin D3, the control group (n = 21), and the group of patients with optimal vitamin D status at admission (n = 16). RESULTS The mean ± SD of preoperative 25(OH)D levels in the control, intervention, and optimal vitamin D status groups were 15.15 ± 3.63 ng/mL, 16.61 ± 2.56 ng/mL, and 40.03 ± 10.56 ng/mL, respectively (P < 0.001). Crude survival was significantly greater in the optimal vitamin D status group than those in another two groups (P = 0.005). Also, Cox proportional hazard model showed that the risk of mortality was higher in the control group and the intervention group than in the group of patients with optimal vitamin D status at admission (P-trend = 0.03). However, this correlation weakened in the full-adjusted models. Preoperative total calcium had an inverse significant correlation with mortality risk [HR value 0.25, (95%, CI: 0.09-0.66), P = 0.005], and age had a positive correlation [HR value 1.07, (95%, CI: 1.02-1.11), P = 0.001]. CONCLUSION Total calcium and age were predictive factors in six-month mortality and optimal vitamin D status appears to improve the survival in these patients, which should be examined more closely in future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammadreza Shahmohammadi
- Functional Neurosurgery Research Center, Shohada Tajrish Comprehensive Neurosurgical Center of Excellence, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Melika Hajimohammadebrahim-Ketabforoush
- Department of Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Nutrition Sciences and Food Technology, National Nutrition and Food Technology Research Institute, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
| | - Zahra Vahdat Shariatpanahi
- Department of Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Nutrition Sciences and Food Technology, National Nutrition and Food Technology Research Institute, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tewarie IA, Hulsbergen AFC, Jessurun CAC, Rendon LF, Mekary RA, Smith TR, Broekman MLD. Risk Factors of Second Local Recurrence in Surgically Treated Recurrent Brain Metastases: An Exploratory Analysis. World Neurosurg 2022; 167:e639-e647. [PMID: 36028114 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.08.066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2022] [Revised: 08/12/2022] [Accepted: 08/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A first local recurrence is common after resection or radiotherapy for brain metastasis (BM). However, patients with BMs can develop multiple local recurrences over time. Published data on second local recurrences are scarce. This study aimed to report predictors associated with a second local recurrence in patients with BMs who underwent a craniotomy for a first locally recurrent BM. METHODS Patients were identified from a database at Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for predictors of a second local recurrence were computed using a Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS Of 170 identified surgically treated first locally recurrent lesions, 74 (43.5%) progressed to second locally recurrent lesions at a median of 7 months after craniotomy. Subtotal resection of the first local BM recurrence was significantly associated with shorter time to second local recurrence (hazard ratio = 2.09; 95% confidence interval, 1.27-3.45). Infratentorial location was associated with a worse second local recurrence prognosis (hazard ratio = 2.22; 95% confidence interval, 1.24-3.96). CONCLUSIONS A second local recurrence occurred after 43.5% of craniotomies for first recurrent lesions. Subtotal resection and infratentorial location were the strongest risk factors for worse second local recurrence prognosis following resection of first recurrent BM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ishaan Ashwini Tewarie
- Computational Neurosciences Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; School of Pharmacy, Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Alexander F C Hulsbergen
- Computational Neurosciences Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; School of Pharmacy, Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Charissa A C Jessurun
- Computational Neurosciences Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; School of Pharmacy, Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Luis F Rendon
- Computational Neurosciences Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Rania A Mekary
- Computational Neurosciences Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; School of Pharmacy, Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Timothy R Smith
- Computational Neurosciences Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Marike L D Broekman
- Computational Neurosciences Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; School of Pharmacy, Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kotecha R, Ahluwalia MS, Siomin V, McDermott MW. Surgery, Stereotactic Radiosurgery, and Systemic Therapy in the Management of Operable Brain Metastasis. Neurol Clin 2022; 40:421-436. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ncl.2021.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
6
|
Hulsbergen AFC, Abunimer AM, Ida F, Kavouridis VK, Cho LD, Tewarie IA, Mekary RA, Schucht P, Phillips JG, Verhoeff JJC, Broekman MLD, Smith TR. Neurosurgical resection for locally recurrent brain metastasis. Neuro Oncol 2021; 23:2085-2094. [PMID: 34270740 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noab173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In patients with locally recurrent brain metastases (LRBMs), the role of (repeat) craniotomy is controversial. This study aimed to analyze long-term oncological outcomes in this heterogeneous population. METHODS Craniotomies for LRBM were identified from a tertiary neuro-oncological institution. First, we assessed overall survival (OS) and intracranial control (ICC) stratified by molecular profile, prognostic indices, and multimodality treatment. Second, we compared LRBMs to propensity score-matched patients who underwent craniotomy for newly diagnosed brain metastases (NDBM). RESULTS Across 180 patients, median survival after LRBM resection was 13.8 months and varied by molecular profile, with >24 months survival in ALK/EGFR+ lung adenocarcinoma and HER2+ breast cancer. Furthermore, 102 patients (56.7%) experienced intracranial recurrence; median time to recurrence was 5.6 months. Compared to NDBMs (n = 898), LRBM patients were younger, more likely to harbor a targetable mutation and less likely to receive adjuvant radiation (p < 0.05). After 1:3 propensity matching stratified by molecular profile, LRBM patients generally experienced shorter OS (hazard ratio 1.67 and 1.36 for patients with or without a mutation, p < 0.05) but similar ICC (hazard ratio 1.11 in both groups, p > 0.20) compared to NDBM patients with similar baseline. Results across specific molecular subgroups suggested comparable effect directions of varying sizes. CONCLUSIONS In our data, patients with LRBMs undergoing craniotomy comprised a subgroup of brain metastasis patients with relatively favorable clinical characteristics and good survival outcomes. Recurrent status predicted shorter OS but did not impact ICC. Craniotomy could be considered in selected, prognostically favorable patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander F C Hulsbergen
- Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.,Departments of Neurosurgery, Haaglanden Medical Center and Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden University, The Hague/Leiden, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Abdullah M Abunimer
- Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Fidelia Ida
- Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.,Department of Pharmaceutical Business and Administrative Sciences, School of Pharmacy, MCPHS University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Vasileios K Kavouridis
- Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.,Department of Neurosurgery, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Logan D Cho
- Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.,Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, New York, United States
| | - Ishaan A Tewarie
- Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.,Departments of Neurosurgery, Haaglanden Medical Center and Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden University, The Hague/Leiden, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Rania A Mekary
- Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.,Department of Pharmaceutical Business and Administrative Sciences, School of Pharmacy, MCPHS University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Philippe Schucht
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bern, Kanton Bern, Switzerland
| | - John G Phillips
- Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Joost J C Verhoeff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marike L D Broekman
- Departments of Neurosurgery, Haaglanden Medical Center and Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden University, The Hague/Leiden, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands.,Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Timothy R Smith
- Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Proescholdt MA, Schödel P, Doenitz C, Pukrop T, Höhne J, Schmidt NO, Schebesch KM. The Management of Brain Metastases-Systematic Review of Neurosurgical Aspects. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:1616. [PMID: 33807384 PMCID: PMC8036330 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13071616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2021] [Revised: 03/23/2021] [Accepted: 03/26/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The multidisciplinary management of patients with brain metastases (BM) consists of surgical resection, different radiation treatment modalities, cytotoxic chemotherapy, and targeted molecular treatment. This review presents the current state of neurosurgical technology applied to achieve maximal resection with minimal morbidity as a treatment paradigm in patients with BM. In addition, we discuss the contribution of neurosurgical resection on functional outcome, advanced systemic treatment strategies, and enhanced understanding of the tumor biology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin A. Proescholdt
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany; (M.A.P.); (P.S.); (C.D.); (J.H.); (N.O.S.)
- Wilhelm Sander Neuro-Oncology Unit, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensbur, Germany;
| | - Petra Schödel
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany; (M.A.P.); (P.S.); (C.D.); (J.H.); (N.O.S.)
- Wilhelm Sander Neuro-Oncology Unit, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensbur, Germany;
| | - Christian Doenitz
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany; (M.A.P.); (P.S.); (C.D.); (J.H.); (N.O.S.)
- Wilhelm Sander Neuro-Oncology Unit, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensbur, Germany;
| | - Tobias Pukrop
- Wilhelm Sander Neuro-Oncology Unit, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensbur, Germany;
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Julius Höhne
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany; (M.A.P.); (P.S.); (C.D.); (J.H.); (N.O.S.)
- Wilhelm Sander Neuro-Oncology Unit, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensbur, Germany;
| | - Nils Ole Schmidt
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany; (M.A.P.); (P.S.); (C.D.); (J.H.); (N.O.S.)
- Wilhelm Sander Neuro-Oncology Unit, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensbur, Germany;
| | - Karl-Michael Schebesch
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany; (M.A.P.); (P.S.); (C.D.); (J.H.); (N.O.S.)
- Wilhelm Sander Neuro-Oncology Unit, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensbur, Germany;
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Luther E, Mansour S, Echeverry N, McCarthy D, Eichberg DG, Shah A, Nada A, Berry K, Kader M, Ivan M, Komotar R. Laser Ablation for Cerebral Metastases. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2020; 31:537-547. [DOI: 10.1016/j.nec.2020.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
|
9
|
Jung J, Tailor J, Dalton E, Glancz LJ, Roach J, Zakaria R, Lammy S, Chari A, Budohoski KP, Livermore LJ, Yu K, Jenkinson MD, Brennan PM, Brazil L, Bunce C, Bourmpaki E, Ashkan K, Vergani F. Management evaluation of metastasis in the brain (MEMBRAIN)-a United Kingdom and Ireland prospective, multicenter observational study. Neurooncol Pract 2020; 7:344-355. [PMID: 32537183 PMCID: PMC7274191 DOI: 10.1093/nop/npz063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In recent years an increasing number of patients with cerebral metastasis (CM) have been referred to the neuro-oncology multidisciplinary team (NMDT). Our aim was to obtain a national picture of CM referrals to assess referral volume and quality and factors affecting NMDT decision making. METHODS A prospective multicenter cohort study including all adult patients referred to NMDT with 1 or more CM was conducted. Data were collected in neurosurgical units from November 2017 to February 2018. Demographics, primary disease, KPS, imaging, and treatment recommendation were entered into an online database. RESULTS A total of 1048 patients were analyzed from 24 neurosurgical units. Median age was 65 years (range, 21-93 years) with a median number of 3 referrals (range, 1-17 referrals) per NMDT. The most common primary malignancies were lung (36.5%, n = 383), breast (18.4%, n = 193), and melanoma (12.0%, n = 126). A total of 51.6% (n = 541) of the referrals were for a solitary metastasis and resulted in specialist intervention being offered in 67.5% (n = 365) of cases. A total of 38.2% (n = 186) of patients being referred with multiple CMs were offered specialist treatment. NMDT decision making was associated with number of CMs, age, KPS, primary disease status, and extent of extracranial disease (univariate logistic regression, P < .001) as well as sentinel location and tumor histology (P < .05). A delay in reaching an NMDT decision was identified in 18.6% (n = 195) of cases. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates a changing landscape of metastasis management in the United Kingdom and Ireland, including a trend away from adjuvant whole-brain radiotherapy and specialist intervention being offered to a significant proportion of patients with multiple CMs. Poor quality or incomplete referrals cause delay in NMDT decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josephine Jung
- Department of Neurosurgery, King’s College Hospital, London, UK
- Neurosciences Clinical Trials Unit, King’s College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Jignesh Tailor
- Department of Neurosurgery, St. George’s Hospital, London, UK
- The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - Emma Dalton
- Department of Neurosurgery, The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, UK
| | - Laurence J Glancz
- Department of Neurosurgery, Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospital, UK
| | - Joy Roach
- Wessex Neurological Centre, University Hospitals Southampton, UK
| | - Rasheed Zakaria
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Walton Centre, Liverpool, UK
- Institute of Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, UK
| | - Simon Lammy
- Department of Neurosurgery, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK
| | - Aswin Chari
- Department of Neurosurgery, The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, UK
| | | | | | - Kenny Yu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Salford Royal Hospital, Manchester, UK
- Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, UK
| | | | - Paul M Brennan
- Translational Neurosurgery, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, UK
| | - Lucy Brazil
- Guy’s and St. Thomas’ Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Catey Bunce
- Department of Primary Care & Public Health Sciences, Kings College London, UK
| | - Elli Bourmpaki
- Department of Primary Care & Public Health Sciences, Kings College London, UK
| | - Keyoumars Ashkan
- Neurosciences Clinical Trials Unit, King’s College Hospital, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Zattra CM, Zhang DY, Broggi M, Velz J, Vasella F, Seggewiss D, Schiavolin S, Bozinov O, Krayenbühl N, Sarnthein J, Ferroli P, Regli L, Stienen MN. Repeated craniotomies for intracranial tumors: is the risk increased? Pooled analysis of two prospective, institutional registries of complications and outcomes. J Neurooncol 2018; 142:49-57. [PMID: 30474767 PMCID: PMC6399174 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-018-03058-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2018] [Accepted: 11/21/2018] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Deciding whether to re-operate patients with intracranial tumor recurrence or remnant is challenging, as the data on safety of repeated procedures is limited. This study set out to evaluate the risks for morbidity, mortality, and complications after repeated operations, and to compare those to primary operations. Methods Retrospective observational two-center study on consecutive patients undergoing microsurgical tumor resection. The data derived from independent, prospective institutional registries. The primary endpoint was morbidity at 3 months (M3), defined as significant decrease on the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS). Secondary endpoints were mortality, rate and severity of complications according to the Clavien–Dindo Grade (CDG). Results 463/2403 (19.3%) were repeated procedures. Morbidity at M3 occurred in n = 290 patients (12.1%). In univariable analysis, patients undergoing repeated surgery were 98% as likely as patients undergoing primary surgery to experience morbidity (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.72–1.34, p = 0.889). In multivariable analysis adjusted for age, sex, tumor size, histology and posterior fossa location, the relationship remained stable (aOR 1.25, 95% CI 0.90–1.73, p = 0.186). Mortality was n = 10 (0.4%) at discharge and n = 95 (4.0%) at M3, without group differences. At least one complication occurred in n = 855, and the rate (35.5% vs. 35.9%, p = 0.892) and severity (CDG; p = 0.520) was similar after primary and repeated procedures. Results were reproduced in subgroup analyses for meningiomas, gliomas and cerebral metastases. Conclusions Repeated surgery for intracranial tumors does not increase the risk of morbidity. Mortality, and both the rate and severity of complications are comparable to primary operations. This information is of value for patient counseling and the informed consent process. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s11060-018-03058-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Costanza Maria Zattra
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Zurich and Clinical Neuroscience Center, University of Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
- Neurosurgical Unit 2, Department of Neurosurgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy
| | - David Y Zhang
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Zurich and Clinical Neuroscience Center, University of Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Morgan Broggi
- Neurosurgical Unit 2, Department of Neurosurgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy
| | - Julia Velz
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Zurich and Clinical Neuroscience Center, University of Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Flavio Vasella
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Zurich and Clinical Neuroscience Center, University of Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Dominik Seggewiss
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Zurich and Clinical Neuroscience Center, University of Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Silvia Schiavolin
- Public Health and Disability Unit, Department of Neurology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy
| | - Oliver Bozinov
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Zurich and Clinical Neuroscience Center, University of Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Niklaus Krayenbühl
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Zurich and Clinical Neuroscience Center, University of Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Johannes Sarnthein
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Zurich and Clinical Neuroscience Center, University of Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Paolo Ferroli
- Neurosurgical Unit 2, Department of Neurosurgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Regli
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Zurich and Clinical Neuroscience Center, University of Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Martin N Stienen
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Zurich and Clinical Neuroscience Center, University of Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kamp MA, Fischer I, Dibué-Adjei M, Munoz-Bendix C, Cornelius JF, Steiger HJ, Slotty PJ, Turowski B, Rapp M, Sabel M. Predictors for a further local in-brain progression after re-craniotomy of locally recurrent cerebral metastases. Neurosurg Rev 2017; 41:813-823. [DOI: 10.1007/s10143-017-0931-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2017] [Revised: 11/01/2017] [Accepted: 11/20/2017] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
|