Inpatient rehabilitation facility discharge destination among younger adults with traumatic brain injury: differences by race and ethnicity

Efficacy of BETTER transitional care intervention for diverse patients with traumatic brain injury and their families: Study protocol of a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to examine the efficacy of BETTER (Brain Injury, Education, Training, and Therapy to Enhance Recovery) vs. usual transitional care management among diverse adults with traumatic brain injury (TBI) discharged home from acute hospital care and families.

METHODS

This will be a single-site, two-arm, randomized controlled trial (N = 436 people, 218 patient/family dyads, 109 dyads per arm) of BETTER, a culturally- and linguistically-tailored, patient- and family-centered, TBI transitional care intervention for adult patients with TBI and families. Skilled clinical interventionists will follow a manualized protocol to address patient/family needs. The interventionists will co-establish goals with participants; coordinate post-hospital care, services, and resources; and provide patient/family education and training on self- and family-management and coping skills for 16 weeks following hospital discharge. English- and Spanish-speaking adult patients with mild-to-severe TBI who are discharged directly home from the hospital without inpatient rehabilitation or transfer to other settings (community discharge) and associated family caregivers are eligible and will be randomized to treatment or usual transitional care management. We will use intention-to-treat analysis to determine if patients receiving BETTER have a higher quality of life (primary outcome, SF-36) at 16-weeks post-hospital discharge than those receiving usual transitional care management. We will conduct a descriptive, qualitative study with 45 dyads randomized to BETTER, using semi-structured interviews, to capture perspectives on barriers and facilitators to participation. Data will be analyzed using conventional content analysis. Finally, we will conduct a cost/budget impact analysis, evaluating differences in intervention costs and healthcare costs by arm.

DISCUSSION

Findings will guide our team in designing a future, multi-site trial to disseminate and implement BETTER into clinical practice to enhance the standard of care for adults with TBI and families. The new knowledge generated will drive advancements in health equity among diverse adults with TBI and families.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT05929833.

The BETTER Traumatic Brain Injury Transitional Care Intervention: A Feasibility Study

This study aimed to investigate the feasibility, acceptability, and clinical outcome measures of BETTER (Brain Injury Education, Training, and Therapy to Enhance Recovery), a culturally tailored traumatic brain injury (TBI) transitional care intervention, among diverse younger adult patients with TBI (age 18-64) and their caregivers. Trained clinical interventionists addressed patient/family needs; established goals; coordinated post-hospital care and resources; and provided patient/family training on self- and family-management coping skills. Fifteen dyads enrolled (N = 31, 15 patients, 16 caregivers). All completed baseline data; 74.2% (n = 23; 10 patients, 13 caregivers) completed 8-week data; 83.8% (n = 26; 13 each) completed 16-week data. Approximately 38% (n = 12, 3 patients, 9 caregivers) completed acceptability data, showing positive experiences (mean = 9.25, range 0-10; SD = 2.01). Overall and mental quality of life (QOL) scores did not differ over time but physical QOL scores did improve over time (baseline: 30.3, 8 weeks: 46.5, 16 weeks: 61.6; p = 0.0056), which was considered to be a suitable outcome measure for a future trial. BETTER is a promising intervention with implications to improve TBI care standards. Research is needed to determine efficacy in a randomized trial.

Social Determinants of Health in Pediatric Rehabilitation for Children with Traumatic Injury: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

To examine the current evidence regarding health care disparities in pediatric rehabilitation after hospitalization with traumatic injury.

STUDY DESIGN

This systematic review utilized both PubMed and EMBASE, and each was searched with key MESH terms. Studies were included in the systematic review if they (1) addressed social determinants of health including, but not limited to, race, ethnicity, insurance status, and income level; (2) focused on inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation services posthospital stay; (3) were based in the pediatric population; and (4) addressed traumatic injury requiring hospitalization. Only studies from within the US were included.

RESULTS

From 10 169 studies identified, 455 abstracts were examined for full-text review, and 24 studies were chosen for data extraction. Synthesis of the 24 studies revealed 3 major themes: (1) access to services; (2) outcomes from rehabilitation; and (3) service provision. Patients with public insurance had decreased availability of service providers and had longer outpatient wait times. Non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic children were more likely to have greater injury severity and decreased functional independence after discharge. Lack of interpreter services was associated with decreased utilization of outpatient services.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review identified significant effects of health care disparities on the rehabilitation process in pediatric traumatic injury. Social determinants of health must be thoughtfully addressed to identify key areas of improvement for the provision of equitable health care.

"If you respect me, you are respecting my culture": methods and recommendations for personalizing a TBI transitional care intervention

OBJECTIVE

Despite research, national legislation, and clinical guidelines supporting transitional care, there is minimal benefit from existing transitional care interventions for racial/ethnic minorities with traumatic brain injury (TBI) discharged home from acute hospital care. Existing TBI transitional care interventions are not tailored to address the needs/preferences of patients from various racial/ethnic minority groups. The purpose of this study was to describe use of personalization to tailor a TBI transitional care intervention for various racial/ethnic groups.

DESIGN

Following preliminary intervention manual development, a qualitative descriptive study was conducted using eight focus groups with 40 English-and Spanish-speaking participants (12 patients, 12 caregivers, and 16 providers).

RESULTS

Three personalization-related themes emerged: 1) what is important to me, 2) finding someone to deliver the intervention who can adapt to my needs, and 3) respect over culture. Findings informed personalization strategies within our final manual.

CONCLUSIONS

We recommend researchers who wish to use personalization to tailor interventions to consider: 1) allowing stakeholders to dictate what is most important and 2) implementing an iterative intervention development process with input from diverse stakeholders. Findings have implications for informing the development of transitional care interventions to increase the likelihood that interventions are inclusive of needs and preferences of various races/ethnicities.

Predictors of cognitive gains during inpatient rehabilitation for older adults with traumatic brain injury

INTRODUCTION

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) among older adults is increasing and can affect cognition. To effectively meet the rehabilitation needs of older adults, a clearer picture is needed of patient-, clinical-, and facility-level characteristics that affect cognitive recovery during inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) stays.

OBJECTIVE

To identify patient, clinical, and facility factors associated with cognitive recovery among older adults with TBI who received IRF care.

DESIGN

Secondary data analysis.

SETTING

Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation-participating IRFs in the United States.

PATIENTS

Patients were 65 to 99 years of age at IRF admission for TBI. Participants received IRF care between 2002 and 2018 (N = 137,583); 56.3% were male; 84.2% were white; mean age was 78.7 years.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Change in Functional Independence Measure Cognitive Score (FIM-Cognitive) from IRF admission to discharge, categorized as favorable (FIM-cognitive score gains ≥3 points) or poor (FIM-cognitive score gains <3 points) cognitive outcomes.

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

RESULTS

Patients had greater odds of favorable cognitive recovery if they were female (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-1.08), had higher motor functioning at IRF admission (aOR 1.03, 95% CI 1.03-1.04), longer length of stay (aOR 1.07, 95% CI 1.06-1.07), or received care at a freestanding IRF (vs. hospital rehab unit) (aOR 1.57, 95% CI 1.52-1.61). Patients who were older (aOR 0.99, 95% CI 0.98-0.99), Black (aOR 0.79, 95% CI 0.75-0.83), Hispanic or Latino (aOR 0.97, 95% CI 0.91-1.02), or were part of another racial or ethnic group (aOR 0.85, 95% CI 0.81-0.90) (vs. White), had high-cost comorbid conditions (aOR 0.71, 95% CI 0.65-0.76), or who had higher cognitive functioning at IRF admission (aOR 0.90, 95% CI 0.90-0.91) had lower odds of favorable cognitive recovery.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient (age, sex, race, ethnicity), clinical (level of functioning at IRF admission, length of stay) and facility (e.g., freestanding IRF) factors contributed to the cognitive recoveries of older adults during IRF stays.

Centering race/ethnicity: Differences in traumatic brain injury inpatient rehabilitation outcomes

BACKGROUND

Persons of color have a higher incidence of traumatic brain injury (TBI) and experience disparities in the quality and quantity of interventions received, discharge disposition, functional outcomes, and mortality rate post TBI.

OBJECTIVE

To examine racial/ethnic differences in rehabilitation outcomes for patients with TBI.

DESIGN

Multiyear (2005-2016) and retrospective cohort using secondary data analysis from inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs) across the United States.

SETTING

eRehabData participating IRFs throughout the United States.

PATIENTS

Forty-one thousand eight hundred forty-seven adults with a diagnosis of TBI, admitted to U.S. eRehabData participating IRFs.

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Inpatient rehabilitation functional outcomes and discharge disposition.

RESULTS

Participants were 41,847 non-Hispanic Whites (NHWs), Hispanics, non-Hispanic Asians (NHAs), and non-Hispanic Blacks (NHBs) aged 18-107 years. NHWs were used as the reference group. NHBs had the longest length of stay (17.65 ± 14.96). At admission, NHB, Hispanic, and NHA races/ethnicities were significantly associated with 1-3 point lower motor, cognitive, and total Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores. NHB race was significantly associated with less than 1-point lower cognitive, motor, and total efficiency FIM scores. At discharge, NHB race was significantly associated with 1-2 point lower motor, cognitive, and total FIM scores; Hispanics and NHA race were associated with less than 1-point lower cognitive FIM scores. Compared to NHWs, Hispanic ethnicity was associated with greater odds of a discharge to home (odds ratio = 1.16, 95% confidence interval = 1.06-1.27).

CONCLUSION

Contrary to established literature on functionality differences 1 year post TBI, the current study found racial/ethnic differences in functional outcomes during inpatient rehabilitation. These findings suggest a need for cultural competence/sensitivity in the care of racial/ethnic persons and centering potential contributing factors for racial/ethnic differences in TBI rehabilitation outcomes.

Sex and Racial/Ethnic Differences in Within-Stay Readmissions During Inpatient Rehabilitation Among Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to determine the association of sex and race/ethnicity with acute hospital readmissions ("within-stay readmissions") during inpatient rehabilitation facility care versus patients discharged home without a within-stay readmission among traumatic brain injury patients.

DESIGN

The study used a secondary analysis ( N = 210,440) of Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation data using multiple logistic regression.

RESULTS

Within-stay readmissions occurred for 11.79% of female and 11.77% of male traumatic brain injury patients. Sex-specific models identified insurance, comorbidities, and complications factored differently in likelihood of within-stay readmissions among female than male patients but association of all other factors were similar per group. Within-stay readmissions differences were more pronounced by race/ethnicity: White, 11.63%; Black, 11.32%; Hispanic/Latino, 9.78%; and other, 10.61%. Descriptive bivariate analysis identified racial/ethnic patients with within-stay readmissions had greater days from traumatic brain injury to inpatient rehabilitation facility admission (White, 17.66; Black, 21.70; Hispanic/Latino, 23.81; other, 20.66) and lower admission cognitive and motor function. Factors differed across models predicting within-stay readmissions for race/ethnic groups; age, admission motor and cognitive function, complications, and length of stay were consistent across groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates disparities by race/ethnicity for inpatient rehabilitation facility within-stay readmissions among traumatic brain injury patients and factors predictive of this potentially preventable outcome by sex and race/ethnicity. Findings could inform care planning and quality improvement efforts for TBI patients.

Employment probability trajectories in hispanics over the 10 years after traumatic brain injury: A model systems study

BACKGROUND: Research has found that Hispanics with traumatic brain injury (TBI) have reduced functional outcomes compared to non-Hispanic Whites, including lower probabilities of post-injury employment. However, previous studies were cross-sectional, combined racial/ethnic minority groups, and did not examine the factors that predict return to work of Hispanics longitudinally. OBJECTIVE: To determine the demographic and injury-related predictors of employment probability trajectories during the first 10 years after TBI. METHODS: 1,346 Hispanics in the TBI Model Systems Database was included. Hierarchical linear modeling was used to examine baseline predictors of employment probability trajectories across this time period. RESULTS: Employment probability demonstrated a quadratic movement over time, with an initial increase followed by a plateau or slight decrease. Hispanics with TBI had higher employment probability trajectories if they had been younger at the time of injury, spent less time in posttraumatic amnesia, had greater years of education, had been employed at the time of injury, had higher annual earnings at the time of injury, and had experienced a non-violent mechanism of injury. CONCLUSION: Culturally adapted treatment programs with a focus on early intervention incorporating vocational rehabilitation and employment programs for Hispanics with TBI who present with these risk factors are needed.

Assessment of the individual and compounding effects of marginalization factors on injury severity, discharge location, recovery, and employment outcomes at 1 year after traumatic brain injury

Objective

The aim of this study is to examine the effect of eight distinct marginalized group memberships and explore their compounding effect on injury severity, recovery, discharge location, and employment outcomes 1-year after traumatic brain injury (TBI).

Methods

Individuals with medically confirmed, complicated mild-severe TBI (N = 300) requiring inpatient rehabilitation care between the ages of 18 and 65 were recruited at two urban (public and private) health systems between 2013 and 2019. Data were collected from self-report and medical record abstraction. Marginalized group membership (MGM) includes racial and ethnic minority status, less than a high school diploma/GED, limited English proficiency, substance abuse, homelessness, psychiatric hospitalizations, psychiatric disorders, and incarceration history. Membership in four or more of these groups signifies high MGM. In addition, these factors were explored individually. Unadjusted and adjusted linear and logistic regressions and Kruskal–Wallis tests were used to assess the associations of interest in RStudio.

Results

After adjusting for age, sex, and cause of injury, compared to TBI patients with low MGM, those with high MGM experience significantly longer post-traumatic amnesia (95% CI = 2.70, 16.50; p = 0.007) and are significantly more likely to have a severe TBI (per the Glasgow-Coma Scale) (95% CI = 1.70, 6.10; p ≤ 0.001) than a complicated mild-moderate injury. Individuals with high MGM also are significantly less likely to be engaged in competitive paid employment 1 year after injury (95% CI = 2.40, 23.40; p = 0.001). Patients with high MGM are less likely to be discharged to the community compared to patients with low MGM, but this association was not significant (95% CI = 0.36, 1.16; p = 0.141). However, when assessing MGMs in isolation, certain associations were not significant in unadjusted or adjusted models.

Conclusion

This exploratory study's findings reveal that when four or more marginalization factors intersect, there is a compounding negative association with TBI severity, recovery, and employment outcomes. No significant association was found between high MGM and discharge location. When studied separately, individual MGMs had varying effects. Studying marginalization factors affecting individuals with TBI has critical clinical and social implications. These findings underline the importance of addressing multidimensional factors concurrent with TBI recovery, as the long-term effects of TBI can place additional burdens on individuals and their economic stability.

Design, methods, and baseline characteristics of the Brain Injury Education, Training, and Therapy to Enhance Recovery (BETTER) feasibility study: a transitional care intervention for younger adult patients with traumatic brain injury and caregivers

OBJECTIVES

We developed a patient- and family-centered traumatic brain injury (TBI) transitional care intervention, called BETTER (Brain Injury Education, Training, and Therapy to Enhance Recovery), to improve quality of life (via SF-36) of younger TBI patients of different racial groups discharged home from acute hospital care and caregivers. We describe our design, methods, and baseline characteristics for our feasibility study.

METHODS

We co-developed BETTER with input from key stakeholders (TBI patients and caregivers, healthcare providers, and interdisciplinary research team members). BETTER is guided by the Individual and Family Self-Management Theory, our team's prior research, as well as literature used to support, educate, and train patients and families recovering from TBI and other conditions. The intervention is delivered by trained clinical interventionists (transitional care managers), beginning 24-72 h pre-discharge to 16 weeks post-discharge. BETTER offers tailored transitional care support to patient/family dyads, including assessing needs; establishing goals; coordinating post-hospital care, services, and resources; and providing patient/family education and training on brain injury coping skills. The majority of the intervention is delivered remotely via phone and remote video conferencing platform (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04584554).

RESULTS

We enrolled 15 dyads (N = 31, 15 patients, 16 caregivers) in this single arm, single center feasibility study. Most patients were men (n = 11, 73.33%), had a mean age of 39.07 (SD: 15.15), and were Black (n = 9, 60%), White (n = 5, 33.3%), or American Indian (n = 1, 0.66%). Injury severities were mild (n = 6, 40%), moderate (n = 4, 26.6%) or severe (n = 5, 33.33%). Most patients were insured (n = 10; 66.7%), had a high school education (n = 6; 40%); and earned $30,000 or less per year (n = 11; 73.3%). Most caregivers were married (n = 9, 56.25%) women (n = 14, 87.5%) with a mean age of 43.38 (SD: 10.45) and were Black (n = 8, 50%), White (n = 7, 43.75%), or American Indian (n = 1, 0.62%). Most caregivers identified as the spouse (n = 7; 43.75%) or parent (n = 6; 37.5%) of the patient.

CONCLUSIONS

BETTER is among the first TBI transitional care intervention to address needs/preferences for younger TBI patients of different racial groups after discharge home from acute hospital care and families. Findings can be used to inform future work.