1
|
Collett BR, Gallagher ER, Johns AL, Trevino CO, Leroux BG, Shic F, Crerand CE, Baylis AL, Cummings CA, Santillan L. Book-Sharing for Toddlers with Clefts (BOOST): Protocol for a randomized controlled trial of a remote intervention to promote language development in children with cleft palate. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0304630. [PMID: 38870107 PMCID: PMC11175488 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2024] [Accepted: 05/15/2024] [Indexed: 06/15/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Children with cleft palate, with or without cleft lip (CP±L), exhibit language delays on average compared to children without clefts. Interventions to address these disparities are scarce. In this multi-center study, Book Sharing for Toddlers with Clefts (BOOST), we will test a remote, parent-focused intervention to promote language development in children with CP±L. OBJECTIVES The study will test two primary hypotheses. First, toddlers randomized to BOOST will exhibit better language outcomes than children receiving standard-of-care (SOC). Second, we hypothesize that the BOOST program's effect on language outcomes is mediated by the frequency and quality of parent-child reading interactions. METHODS The study is a randomized-controlled trial comparing the BOOST group to a SOC comparison group. We will enroll N = 320 English and/or Spanish-speaking children ages 24-32 months with isolated CP±L (n = 160 per group). Both groups will receive children's books, and parents will record and upload videos of themselves reading the books with their children using a smartphone app developed for the study. Parents will also complete surveys asking whether they read to their children on five randomly selected days each week. In addition, the BOOST group will participate in 3 remote dialogic book-sharing intervention sessions via Zoom. We will code book-sharing videos to assess parents' target skill usage and children's expressive language. End-of-study assessments will include measures of child language outcomes (e.g., clinician-administered measures, parent reports, and naturalistic child language samples). RESULTS Enrollment began in April 2024 and will continue through approximately April 2028. CONCLUSION The BOOST study will address a critical gap in the literature on interventions to improve language in children with CP±L. The results will inform the care for toddlers with oral clefts and have potential applications for other populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brent R Collett
- Center for Child Health, Behavior, and Development, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Emily R Gallagher
- Seattle Children's Craniofacial Center, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Alexis L Johns
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
- Division of Plastic and Maxillofacial Surgery, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| | - Cindy O Trevino
- Center for Child Health, Behavior, and Development, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Brian G Leroux
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
- Department of Oral Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Frederick Shic
- Center for Child Health, Behavior, and Development, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Canice E Crerand
- Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America
- Center for Biobehavioral Health, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America
| | - Adriane L Baylis
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America
| | - Caitlin A Cummings
- Department of Speech Pathology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America
| | - Lupita Santillan
- Center for Child Health, Behavior, and Development, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wombacher NR, Lancaster HS, Scherer NJ, Chen DG, Kaiser A, Yamashita R. The impact of enhanced Milieu teaching with phonological emphasis (EMT + PE) on the speech and language outcomes for toddlers with cleft palate in Brazil and the United States of America. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY 2024:1-13. [PMID: 38859760 DOI: 10.1080/17549507.2024.2342783] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to compare the speech and language outcomes of children with cleft palate with or without cleft lip (CP+/-L) in the USA to children with CP+/-L in Brazil who underwent intervention with enhanced Milieu teaching with phonological emphasis (EMT + PE), as there are few cross-country intervention comparisons for children with CP+/-L. METHOD This is a retrospective analysis of 29 participants from the USA and 24 participants from Brazil who were matched on age. The US participants were between the ages of 13-35 months (M = 23.76), spoke Standard American English in the home, and were recruited from East Tennessee State University and Vanderbilt University. The Brazilian participants were between the ages of 20-34 months (M = 25.04), spoke Brazilian Portuguese in the home, and were recruited from the Hospital de Reabilitação de Anomalias Craniofaciais-Universidade de São Paulo. All treatment participants received EMT + PE from trained speech-language pathologists in hospital-university clinics. RESULT The treatment groups demonstrated greater gains than comparison groups in percent consonants correct, number of different words, and expressive/receptive vocabulary. There was no main effect nor interaction by country. CONCLUSION The application of EMT + PE in a second culture and language is a viable early intervention option for participants with CP+/-L.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Ann Kaiser
- Vanderbilt University, Nashville, USA, and
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tahmasebi N, Zarifian T, Ashtari A, Biglarian A. Telepractice Parent Training of Enhanced Milieu Teaching With Phonological Emphasis (EMT+PE) For Persian-Speaking Toddlers With Nonsyndromic Cleft Palate: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Res Protoc 2024; 13:e54426. [PMID: 38640014 PMCID: PMC11069098 DOI: 10.2196/54426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2023] [Revised: 02/14/2024] [Accepted: 02/22/2024] [Indexed: 04/20/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Children born with a cleft palate with or without a cleft lip (CP/L) are at increased risk for delayed language development and speech sound disorders. Enhanced Milieu Teaching with Phonological Emphasis (EMT+PE) is a recommended naturalistic intervention for toddlers with CP/L. The parents' role in providing naturalistic interventions is critical and they need training based on learning principles to implement these interventions. Telepractice is an appropriate method for training parents and children with various speech-related disorders. OBJECTIVE This study aims to determine and compare the effectiveness of telepractice and the parent-implemented EMT+PE intervention on language and speech measures in toddlers with CP/L with usual interventions and determine the effectiveness maintenance of the intervention. METHODS A randomized controlled trial (RCT) will assess the efficacy of telepractice and the parent-implemented EMT+PE intervention in enhancing speech and language measures in toddlers with CP/L. Eligible participants will be randomly assigned to one of 2 groups: the conventional intervention group and the EMT+PE intervention group. Participants' speech and language measures will be evaluated remotely by trained raters before and after the intervention and 2 months after the intervention. Parents of participants in the intervention group will receive 3 months of training in speech and language supportive strategies from trained therapists using telehealth fidelity scales. Parents of participants in the control group will receive the conventional speech and language intervention by cleft team therapists. Study outcomes will include language variables (mean length of utterance) and speech production variables (percent correct consonants). RESULTS The protocol was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences in February 2022. The selection process of participants, as well as training therapists and raters, commenced in January 2022, the therapy and follow-up period ended in June 2023, and pre- and postintervention assessments have been conducted. Data analysis is ongoing, and we expect to publish our results by the summer of 2024. Funding is yet to be received. CONCLUSIONS The results of this study may help us develop a speech and language intervention with a different delivery model for toddlers with CP/L, and the cleft team care can use these results in service delivery. Consistent with our hypothesis, speech and language measures are expected to improve. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/54426.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neda Tahmasebi
- Department of Speech Therapy, Pediatric Neurorehabilitation Research Center, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Talieh Zarifian
- Department of Speech Therapy, Pediatric Neurorehabilitation Research Center, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Atieh Ashtari
- Department of Speech Therapy, Pediatric Neurorehabilitation Research Center, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Akbar Biglarian
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Social Health Research Institute, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Peredo TN, Mancilla-Martinez J, Durkin K, Kaiser A. Teaching Spanish-Speaking Caregivers to Implement EMT en Español: A Small Randomized Trial. EARLY CHILDHOOD RESEARCH QUARTERLY 2022; 58:208-219. [PMID: 35058673 PMCID: PMC8765734 DOI: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2021.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The primary purpose of this study was to examine the effects of using the Teach-Model-Coach-Review approach to teach Spanish-speaking caregivers from low-income households to implement EMT en Español with their young children with language delays. A secondary purpose was to explore the effects of the caregiver-implemented intervention on children's vocabulary. A final and more exploratory goal was to gain insight into caregivers' perceptions of the intervention. METHOD 21 caregiver-child dyads participated in the intent-to-treat randomized control trial. Their children were 30-43 months old with language delays. Dyads were randomly assigned to receive 24 caregiver training sessions delivered at home in Spanish or a wait list control group. Pre, post and 3-month follow assessments included observational measures of caregiver-child interactions and child standardized vocabulary assessments. Caregivers completed surveys rating their perception of the intervention. RESULTS Caregivers in the intervention group had significantly higher percentages of matched turns, expansions, and targets at post-assessment and of expansions and targets at follow-up compared to the control group. Overall, children in the intervention condition had significantly higher receptive vocabulary scores and performed better than children in the control condition on observational measure of their lexical diversity, with moderate effect sizes for most outcomes. Caregivers perceived the intervention as effective and culturally appropriate. CONCLUSIONS Teach-Model-Coach-Review is effective in increasing Spanish-speaking caregivers' use of EMT en Español strategies with their young children with language delays. The intervention also appears to be effective for child vocabulary outcomes and acceptable to caregivers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Kelley Durkin
- Department of Teaching and Learning, Vanderbilt University
| | - Ann Kaiser
- Department of Special Education, Vanderbilt University
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lane H, Harding S, Wren Y. A systematic review of early speech interventions for children with cleft palate. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE & COMMUNICATION DISORDERS 2022; 57:226-245. [PMID: 34767284 DOI: 10.1111/1460-6984.12683] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2020] [Revised: 09/08/2021] [Accepted: 10/05/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Children with cleft palate with or without cleft lip (CP±L) are at high risk of problems with early speech sound production, and these difficulties can persist into later childhood. Early intervention could help to reduce the number of children whose problems become persistent. However, much research in the field to date has focused on older children. There is a need to determine if providing intervention during the phase of early typical speech development leads to better outcomes. AIMS To review the evidence for the effectiveness of interventions targeting speech, delivered in the first 3 years of life for children with CP±L, and discuss factors such as intervention type, facilitator, dosage, outcome measures and the age of the child. METHODS & PROCEDURES The systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42019121964). Eight bibliographic databases including CINAHL and MEDLINE were searched in August 2018. Studies were included if participants received speech and language interventions before 37 months and if they reported outcomes for speech. Two reviewers independently completed inclusion reviews, quality analysis and data extraction. OUTCOME & RESULTS The review included seven papers: one pilot randomized controlled trial, one controlled trial, four cohort studies and one case series report. Interventions largely took a naturalistic approach, namely focused stimulation and milieu teaching. The findings provide preliminary support for naturalistic interventions and suggest that these interventions can be delivered by parents with suitable training. Studies included in the review provided low-strength evidence with variation in both the type of intervention, the manner of delivery and in the risk of bias in the designs used. CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS The papers included in this review suggest that early naturalistic interventions can have positive impacts on the speech development of children with CP±L. However, the reported methodological quality of the publications overall was weak, and the current evidence lacks clarity and specificity in terms of therapy technique, delivery and optimum age of delivery. Future research should use more robust methodological designs to determine whether early speech interventions are beneficial for children born with CP±L. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS What is already known on the subject Children with CP±L show difficulties with early speech development and often have restricted speech sound inventories. They may reach the canonical babbling stage later than children without CP±L and studies have shown that 20% of children with CP±L have speech which is considered unintelligible or barely intelligible at age 5. It has been proposed that early intervention can lessen the impact of CP±L on speech development. However, currently, the evidence for early interventions for children with CP±L is limited, with the majority of studies focusing on children aged 3 years and older. What this paper adds to existing knowledge This paper reviews the evidence for different types of early interventions for speech provided to children born with CP±L and whether these interventions are effective in supporting speech sound development. In this review, early intervention is defined as intervention provided to children in the first 3 years of life. This review describes intervention approaches and how they are delivered for this population. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? In the UK, children born with CP±L and their families are supported by National Health Service (NHS) services over a 20-year period and speech and language therapy sessions may take place over many weeks and months. If providing early intervention in the first 3 years of life is effective, there is the potential for improved speech outcomes in early childhood and a reduced burden of care on children, families and services. This review considers the evidence for early speech intervention for children with CP±L in the first 3 years of life and identifies areas for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah Lane
- Speech and Language Therapy, Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Doncaster, UK
| | - Sam Harding
- Bristol Speech and Language Therapy Research Unit, North Bristol NHS Trust, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Yvonne Wren
- Bristol Speech and Language Therapy Research Unit, North Bristol NHS Trust, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Philp J, Ellis PK, Scherer NJ, Lien KM. Enhanced Milieu Teaching with Phonological Emphasis: A Pilot Telepractice Parent Training Study for Toddlers with Clefts. CHILDREN (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2021; 8:children8090736. [PMID: 34572168 PMCID: PMC8471217 DOI: 10.3390/children8090736] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2021] [Revised: 08/15/2021] [Accepted: 08/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE the purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of training caregivers to use intervention strategies from the Enhanced Milieu Teaching with Phonological Emphasis (EMT + PE) program, delivered via telepractice, and to examine the effects on child speech and language outcomes for children with repaired cleft lip +/- palate (CL/P). DESIGN A multiple baseline within subject design across parent behaviors was replicated across three participating dyads. A pre-post intervention comparison was provided with a non-cleft twin. PARTICIPANTS Three mother-child dyads participated in this study. Children ranged in age from 21 to 27 months at the beginning of the study and all had a diagnosis of CL/P. A noncleft twin without CL/P was assessed pre- and post-intervention to provide a normative comparison. RESULTS Parents demonstrated a positive intervention effect by substantially increasing their use of EMT + PE intervention strategies during telepractice intervention sessions (Tau 0.675 to 1.1333). Following the conclusion of intervention, parents were able to maintain their use of strategies once direct coaching had been discontinued. Children demonstrated increased talking rate, improved speech production and expanded expressive vocabulary measures over the course of intervention. Speech and language development of a child without cleft palate was provided as a comparison. CONCLUSIONS Parents were trained through telepractice to effectively deliver EMT + PE speech and language facilitation strategies that resulted in increased language and speech outcomes for their children with CL/P.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Philp
- Barrow Cleft and Craniofacial Center, 124 W Thomas Rd 3rd Floor, Phoenix, AZ 85013, USA; (J.P.); (K.M.L.)
| | - Paige K. Ellis
- College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA;
| | - Nancy J. Scherer
- College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA;
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-480-965-2905
| | - Kari M. Lien
- Barrow Cleft and Craniofacial Center, 124 W Thomas Rd 3rd Floor, Phoenix, AZ 85013, USA; (J.P.); (K.M.L.)
| |
Collapse
|