Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Brimonidine Tartrate Ophthalmic Solution, 0.025% for Treatment of Ocular Redness

Evaluation of the Safety and Tolerability of Lumify Eye Illuminations Cosmetic Products

Purpose

Cosmetic products applied to the periocular area can cause skin sensitivity reactions, and manufacturers routinely test the safety and tolerability of products in development. This research was sponsored by Bausch + Lomb to evaluate three Lumify Eye Illuminations products: a lash and brow serum, a hydra-gel eye cream, and a micellar water eye makeup remover.

Methods

A cumulative irritation test (CIT) study and a repeated insult patch test (RIPT) study enrolled adult males or females with no known sensitivities to cosmetic products. Three clinical safety studies enrolled adult females with self-reported characteristics targeted by each product, which was applied in a manner consistent with expected use for 8 or 12 weeks.

Results

In CIT (n=34) and RIPT (n=201) studies, faint/minimal erythema reactions were observed in 0% to 2.9% of participants; there were no moderate or severe reactions. No safety signals were observed in participants who completed clinical safety studies for lash and brow serum (n=66 enrolled, n=55 completed [83%]), eye cream (n=61 enrolled, n=52 completed [85%]), or eye makeup remover (n=80 enrolled, n=68 completed [85%]). No clinically relevant changes in visual acuity or ophthalmologic slit-lamp examination findings were noted. No participants reported ocular sensations of burning/stinging, foreign-body sensation, or soreness. At the final clinical safety study assessment, mild cutaneous erythema (as graded by the investigator) was reported for one participant (eye cream study); no other prespecified signs of cutaneous irritation (eg, edema, dryness) were observed. A treatment-related adverse event that led to study discontinuation was experienced by one participant in the eye makeup remover study (bilateral periorbital swelling).

Conclusion

Findings from rigorously conducted irritation testing and clinical safety studies indicated that these products were safe and well tolerated. Increased availability of data regarding ocular and cutaneous safety of cosmetic products can inform consumer decision-making and eye care provider recommendations.

Neurokinin-1 Receptor Antagonism Reduces Nonallergic Ocular Redness in a Rabbit Model

Purpose: To evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of topical application of a neurokinin-1 receptor (NK1R) antagonist in a rabbit model of nonallergic ocular redness. Methods: Nonallergic ocular redness was induced in rabbits by a single, topical application of dapiparzole hydrochloride eye drops (0.5%, 1%, 2%, or 5%). The NK1R antagonist L-703,606 was topically applied to the eye at the same time of induction or 20 min after induction, and phosphate buffered saline (PBS) treatment served as the control. Superior bulbar conjunctival images were taken every 30 s for the first 2 min, followed by every 4 min for 8 min, and then every 10 min until 1 h. The severity of ocular redness was evaluated on the images using ImageJ-based ocular redness index (ORI) calculations. Results: The ORI scores were significantly increased after the application of 0.5%, 1%, 2%, or 5% dapiparzole at each time point evaluated, with the most severe redness induced by the 5% dapiprazole that led to a maximal mean increase in ORI score of 14 at 20 min post-induction and thus used for subsequent evaluation of therapeutic efficacy of NK1R antagonism. Topical L-703,606, when applied at the same time as dapiprazole induction, significantly suppressed the increase of ORI scores at all time points (∼40% decrease). Furthermore, when applied at 20 min after dapiprazole induction, L-703,606 rapidly and effectively suppressed the increase of ORI scores at 30, 40, 50, and 60 min (∼30% decrease). Conclusions: Topical blockade of NK1R effectively prevents and alleviates nonallergic ocular redness in a novel animal model.

TFOS Lifestyle: Impact of elective medications and procedures on the ocular surface

The word "elective" refers to medications and procedures undertaken by choice or with a lower grade of prioritization. Patients usually use elective medications or undergo elective procedures to treat pathologic conditions or for cosmetic enhancement, impacting their lifestyle positively and, thus, improving their quality of life. However, those interventions can affect the homeostasis of the tear film and ocular surface. Consequently, they generate signs and symptoms that could impair the patient's quality of life. This report describes the impact of elective topical and systemic medications and procedures on the ocular surface and the underlying mechanisms. Moreover, elective procedures performed for ocular diseases, cosmetic enhancement, and non-ophthalmic interventions, such as radiotherapy and bariatric surgery, are discussed. The report also evaluates significant anatomical and biological consequences of non-urgent interventions to the ocular surface, such as neuropathic and neurotrophic keratopathies. Besides that, it provides an overview of the prophylaxis and management of pathological conditions resulting from the studied interventions and suggests areas for future research. The report also contains a systematic review investigating the quality of life among people who have undergone small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). Overall, SMILE refractive surgery seems to cause more vision disturbances than LASIK in the first month post-surgery, but less dry eye symptoms in long-term follow up.

Brimonidine tartrate ophthalmic solution 0.025% for redness relief: an overview of safety and efficacy

INTRODUCTION

Ocular redness, or conjunctival hyperemia, is a common ophthalmic sign associated with reduced quality of life. For redness without apparent underlying pathology, topical ophthalmic decongestants have been widely used.

AREAS COVERED

Brimonidine tartrate was approved in 2017 as a topical vasoconstrictor at a 0.025% concentration for relief of ocular redness. Since then, investigators have reported on efficacy and safety findings from studies evaluating low-dose brimonidine for reducing ocular redness.

EXPERT OPINION

Brimonidine is highly selective for α₂-adrenergic receptors. Clinical trials have so far shown that the drug in low doses significantly reduces ocular redness in comparison to vehicle for up to 8 hours. Brimonidine-treated eyes did not present side effects of other vasoconstrictors, such as hypotension, cardiac arrhythmia or drowsiness. Ocular adverse events such as allergic reactions and redness rebound were also minimal. In this review, we examine in detail published literature on the mechanism of brimonidine tartrate and its efficacy and safety in relieving conjunctival hyperemia.

Can bleeding in trabeculectomy be decreased? Effectiveness of brimonidine pre-treatment

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of preoperative topical brimonidine use to maintain visibility during trabeculectomy and control intraoperative bleeding and postoperative subconjunctival hemorrhage.

METHODS

The first group comprised 35 eyes of 34 patients administered brimonidine tartrate 0.15% (Brimogut, Bilim Ilac, Turkey) eye drops 6 and 3 min before surgery, and 33 eyes of 31 patients who received no medication for vasoconstriction formed the second group. Preoperative and postoperative photographs and operation video images were taken and vision analysis software used. Black-and-white images were obtained to identify the blood vessel and surface hemorrhage areas. The surface area of the hemorrhage was calculated by counting the black pixels with Image J software.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between two groups in terms of baseline (preoperative) eye redness (p > 0.05). In the first group, the eye redness values were 344.7 ± 19.5 pixels preoperatively and 244.1 ± 23.3 pixels at the beginning of the surgery, respectively (p < 0.001). However, no significant change was observed in the second group in eye redness (348.2 ± 17.5 pixels preoperatively and 360.7 ± 26.8 pixels at the beginning of the surgery, p > 0.05). Cautery was used for an average of 11.91 ± 1.96 s in the first group and 25.57 ± 4.66 s in the second to control intraoperative bleeding (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative topical brimonidine use in trabeculectomy surgery significantly decreased intraoperative bleeding and postoperative subconjunctival hemorrhage and facilitated bleeding control.

Prophylactic effect of brimonidine to minimize the incidence of subconjunctival hemorrhage in the early postoperative period after 23G pars plana vitrectomy

Background

Several studies have investigated and demonstrated the prophylactic effect of brimonidine drops in preventing subconjunctival hemorrhage in some microincisional ophthalmic surgeries, such as intravitreal injections or cataract surgery. However, there are no previous studies investigating this prophylactic effect after 23G microincisional vitreoretinal surgery.

Aim

The aim of the current study was to determine whether subconjunctival hemorrhage after 23G pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) could be prevented with the use of prophylactic topical brimonidine.

Methods

This was a phase III, prospective, interventional, randomized, controlled single-center clinical trial with a follow-up of 2 weeks. A total of 77 eyes (mean age: 68.4 ± 10.7 years) undergoing 23G PPV were included and randomized into two groups: group 1 including 41 patients receiving prophylactic preoperative treatment with brimonidine, and group 2 (control group) including 36 patients not receiving this prophylactic treatment. Differences in terms of number of conjunctival quadrants affected with subconjunctival hemorrhage were evaluated in each of the follow-up visits.

Results

The presence of subconjunctival hemorrhage was similar in both groups the first days after surgery (p > 0.05). At the last visit (10-14 days after surgery), this condition was significantly more frequent in control group where there was a significant difference, being more frequent in the control group (7.3% vs 28.6%, p = 0.022). The number of conjunctival quadrants affected was also similar in both groups, except for the last visit in which most of the patients treated with brimonidine (92.7%) showed no bleeding compared to 71.4% in control group. No effect on the efficacy of brimonidine treatment of the presence of blood hypertension, diabetes, and antiplatelet or anticoagulant treatment was observed.

Conclusion

Brimonidine seems to be a useful option to decrease subconjunctival hemorrhage after microincisional vitreoretinal surgery or improve its resolution during the first postoperative week. This finding should be mainly due to the vasoconstrictor effect of brimonidine.

Trial registration

EudraCT, 2012-002895-15 (registered 19 December 2012); https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/search?query=2012-002895-15.

Ocular redness - I: Etiology, pathogenesis, and assessment of conjunctival hyperemia

The translucent appearance of the conjunctiva allows for immediate visualization of changes in the circulation of the conjunctival microvasculature consisting of extensive branching of superficial and deep arterial systems and corresponding drainage pathways, and the translucent appearance of the conjunctiva allows for immediate visualization of changes in the circulation. Conjunctival hyperemia is caused by a pathological vasodilatory response of the microvasculature in response to inflammation due to a myriad of infectious and non-infectious etiologies. It is one of the most common contributors of ocular complaints that prompts visits to medical centers. Our understanding of these neurogenic and immune-mediated pathways has progressed over time and has played a critical role in developing targeted novel therapies. Due to a multitude of underlying etiologies, patients must be accurately diagnosed for efficacious management of conjunctival hyperemia. The diagnostic techniques used for the grading of conjunctival hyperemia have also evolved from descriptive and subjective grading scales to more reliable computer-based objective grading scales.

Ocular redness - II: Progress in development of therapeutics for the management of conjunctival hyperemia

Conjunctival hyperemia is one of the most common causes for visits to primary care physicians, optometrists, ophthalmologists, and emergency rooms. Despite its high incidence, the treatment options for patients with conjunctival hyperemia are restricted to over-the-counter drugs that provide symptomatic relief due to short duration of action, tachyphylaxis and rebound redness. As our understanding of the immunopathological pathways causing conjunctival hyperemia expands, newer therapeutic targets are being discovered. These insights have also contributed to the development of animal models for mimicking the pathogenic changes in microvasculature causing hyperemia. Furthermore, this progress has catalyzed the development of novel therapeutics that provide efficacious, long-term relief from conjunctival hyperemia with minimal adverse effects.

Over-the-Counter Ocular Decongestants in the United States - Mechanisms of Action and Clinical Utility for Management of Ocular Redness

To manage ocular redness effectively, health-care practitioners require an understanding of the pathophysiology, clinical features and differential diagnosis of ocular redness, as well as comprehensive knowledge of medical therapies available and their pharmacologic properties. This review aims to provide a clinically relevant summary of the current literature on the mechanism of action, efficacy, and safety of current over-the-counter (OTC) decongestants available for reduction of ocular redness due to minor irritations. Currently marketed OTC products indicated for such use in the United States include topical solutions of tetrahydrozoline 0.05%, naphazoline 0.012% to 0.03%, and brimonidine 0.025%. All 3 agents are adrenergic receptor agonists but vary in their receptor-binding profiles: tetrahydrozoline is a selective α1 receptor agonist; naphazoline is a mixed α1/α2 receptor agonist; and brimonidine is a selective α2 receptor agonist. These OTC decongestants produce vasoconstriction of conjunctival blood vessels, which results in a rapid reduction in ocular redness. In general, ocular adverse events reported in published studies of these OTC decongestants were minimal, mild, and transient, with no significant adverse systemic effects. However, ocular decongestants with α1-adrenergic receptor agonist activity can be associated with loss of effectiveness with continued use (ie, tachyphylaxis) and rebound redness upon treatment discontinuation. In clinical trials of the selective α2-adrenergic receptor agonist brimonidine 0.025%, tachyphylaxis was not observed, and rebound redness was rarely reported.

Emerging Therapeutics for Ocular Surface Disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this article is to review treatment advances in ocular allergy that include the treatment of the various signs and symptoms of the allergic inflammatory response of the ocular surface.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies have demonstrated improved pharmacological effect of topical agents with artificial tears and cold compresses; brimonidine, a new ophthalmic decongestant which has demonstrated decreased rebound conjunctivitis; and potential use of contact lens and other novel delivery instruments to increase medication retention time. Currently, there have been limited advances in novel ophthalmic treatments. Non-pharmacological interventions have demonstrated in a randomized control study that artificial tears and the use cold compresses alone or in combination with ophthalmic antihistamines can enhance the effectiveness of a traditional pharmacological therapy. The primary advances have been the start of head-to-head studies comparing various agents actively being used in the treatment of ocular allergy. In addition, there has been increasing interest in the development of novel delivery systems to increase residence time of pharmacological agents in the ocular surface such as nanoparticles, microfilms; examining novel pathways of controlling the allergic inflammatory response of the ocular surface such as modulation of cytokines, transcription factors, and immunophilins.

Low-dose brimonidine for relief of ocular redness: integrated analysis of four clinical trials

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to provide an integrated analysis of safety and efficacy data for brimonidine tartrate ophthalmic solution 0.025 per cent (low-dose; Bausch & Lomb Incorporated), a topical vasoconstrictor for relief of ocular redness.

METHODS

Integrated efficacy data from two randomised, double-masked, vehicle-controlled studies in subjects with ocular redness as well as safety data from the two efficacy studies, a vehicle-controlled safety study, and a pharmacokinetic study were analysed. Efficacy outcomes analysed included investigator-assessed ocular redness (scale, 0-4) before treatment instillation and at five to 240 minutes post-instillation on Day 1, at five minutes post-instillation on Days 15 and 29, and one week after treatment discontinuation (Day 36), and redness self-assessed by subjects recorded daily in diaries. Safety assessments included adverse events, ophthalmic examinations, and rebound redness upon treatment discontinuation. Drop comfort (scale, 0-10) was a tolerability measure.

RESULTS

The efficacy population included 117 subjects (brimonidine, n = 78; vehicle, n = 39). The safety population included 635 subjects (brimonidine, n = 426; vehicle, n = 209). Investigator-assessed ocular redness was significantly lower with brimonidine versus vehicle at all post-instillation time points on Day 1 (mean change from pre-instillation of -1.4 units for brimonidine and -0.2 units for vehicle; p < 0.0001). Subject-assessed ocular redness was also significantly lower with brimonidine versus vehicle (mean treatment difference in average daily ratings of -0.9; p < 0.0001). There was no evidence of tachyphylaxis through Day 29 and rebound redness was rare. Incidence of ocular adverse events was low, the most common being reduced visual acuity (brimonidine, 4.0 per cent; vehicle, 4.3 per cent) and conjunctival hyperaemia (2.6 and 2.9 per cent, respectively). Both brimonidine and vehicle were rated as very comfortable (mean post-instillation scores, 0.4-0.5).

CONCLUSION

In this integrated analysis, low-dose brimonidine significantly reduced ocular redness with no tachyphylaxis, and minimal rebound redness, and was generally safe and well tolerated.