Clinical Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Corneal Neurotization after Cerebellopontine Angle (CPA) Neurosurgical Procedures

Corneal Neurotization for Neurotrophic Keratopathy: A Multicentre Experience

PURPOSE

Corneal neurotization is an emerging technique that offers potential for visual rehabilitation in neurotrophic keratopathy. This study reports on a multicenter experience and outcomes for both direct and indirect methods of corneal neurotization.

METHODS

Retrospective case series. Sixteen patients with neurotrophic keratopathy who underwent corneal neurotization across 5 centers in Australia and Israel were identified for inclusion. Corneal neurotization was performed via direct neurotization from the ipsilateral or contralateral supraorbital/supratrochlear nerve or by the use of an interpositional sural nerve graft. Change in corneal sensitivity (measured in millimeters by the Cochet-Bonnet aesthesiometer), visual acuity, and corneal health.

RESULTS

Over a mean follow-up period of 31.3 months (range: 3 months-8 years), mean corneal sensitivity improved from 3.6 mm (range: 0-25 mm) to 25.3 mm (range: 0-57 mm). Visual acuity improved on average from 20/380 to 20/260. Twelve of 16 patients (75.0%) improved in at least 2 out of the 3 main outcome measures. Nine patients (56.3%) showed an improvement in visual acuity; 13 (81.3%) showed an improvement in average corneal sensitivity; and 11 (68.8%) showed an improvement in corneal health. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Corneal neurotization is an emerging surgical treatment option for the management of neurotrophic keratopathy. With appropriate case selection, outcomes are favorable and complication rates are low, for a condition that is otherwise challenging to manage. Patients with severe neurotrophic keratopathy should be considered for this surgical treatment option.

Evaluation of Corneal Nerve Regeneration After Minimally Invasive Corneal Neurotization

PURPOSE

To evaluate the corneal nerve regeneration after minimally invasive corneal neurotization (MICN) and to further clarify the recovery patterns of sensory and trophic functions of the corneal nerves.

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study based in the Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital.

METHODS

Eighteen patients (18 eyes) who underwent MICN for neurotrophic keratopathy due to intracranial surgery was conducted to analyze their follow-up data at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after surgery.

RESULTS

At 12 months postoperatively, the growth of the central and peripheral corneal nerve fiber density (CNFD) was 11.47±8.56 and 14.73±8.08 n/mm 2 with subsequent improvement slowing down, and the patient's corneal epithelium defect was healed ahead of the accomplishment of corneal nerve regeneration. The number of dendritic cells also reached its peak. At 18 months postoperatively, the recovery of central and peripheral corneal sensation was 37.22±23.06 mm and 39.38±18.08 mm with no subsequent improvement, and the growth of the central and peripheral corneal nerve branch density (CNBD) was 29.69±11.05 and 43.75±1.41 n/mm 2 , with a positive and significant correlation between corneal sensation and CNBD (at central r =0.632, P <0.005; at peripheral r =0.645, P <0.005). At 24 months postoperatively, mean CNFD, CNBD, and corneal sensation recovered significantly compared with preoperative, but a few patients' corneal sensation recovered insignificantly with good CNFD recovery and poor CNBD recovery.

CONCLUSIONS

After MICN, the trophic function of the corneal nerve recovers before the sensory function, and in particular, the recovery of sensation is based on the coexistence of the corneal nerve trunk and branches.

Corneal Neurotization—Indications, Surgical Techniques and Outcomes

Corneal neurotization is a promising surgical approach for the treatment of moderate to severe neurotrophic keratopathy. This technique aims to restore corneal sensation by transferring healthy nerves, either directly or via a conduit, to the anesthetic cornea. This review provides a report on the current state of development, evidence, and experience in the field. We summarize the data available from clinical reports and case series, placing an emphasis on the diversity of the surgical techniques reported. While these data are encouraging, they also highlight the need for a consensus in reporting outcomes and highlight how the next step will involve validating putative outcome parameters when researching and reporting corneal neurotization surgery.

Aberrant Corneal Homeostasis in Neurosurgery-Induced Neurotrophic Keratopathy

The characteristic features of neurotrophic keratopathy have been well documented by in vivo and in vitro studies using animal models. However, case reports of neurotrophic keratopathy induced by neurosurgery are limited. We describe the clinical characteristics, anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) and in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) findings of neurotrophic keratopathy induced by surgery for intracranial lesions. This is a case series including 6 eyes of 3 patients (mean age, 69.67 ± 12.50 years) with unilateral neurotrophic keratopathy. The clinical findings of three patients were described and IVCM findings of three patients were analyzed. The duration of neuropathy ranged from 2 to 30 years (median, 22 years). Thickening of the epithelial layer and higher reflection density of the anterior stroma were observed during the healing process using AS-OCT. The mean nerve fiber density of the subepithelial plexus, as determined by IVCM, was 1943 ± 1000 μm/mm2 for neurotrophic eyes and 2242 ± 600.3 μm/mm2 for contralateral eyes (p = 0.0347). The mean respective dendritic cell densities were 30.8 ± 21.8 and 6.25 ± 5.59 cells/mm2 (p < 0.0001), while the mean basal cell sizes were 259 ± 86.5 and 185 ± 45.9 μm2 (p < 0.0001), respectively. These findings suggest that neurosurgery-induced neurotrophic keratopathy may be associated with alterations in the healing process and immune cell distribution in the cornea.