Combination inhalers containing inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting beta2-agonists: improved clinical efficacy and dosing options in patients with asthma

Pharmacotherapeutic management of asthma in the elderly patient

INTRODUCTION

Asthma is a heterogeneous syndrome with variable phenotypes. Reversible airway obstruction and airway hyper-responsiveness often with an atopic or eosinophilic component is common in the elderly asthmatic. Asthma chronic obstructive pulmonary disease overlap syndrome (ACOS), a combination of atopy-mediated airway hyper-responsiveness and a history of smoking or other environmental noxious exposures, can lead to some fixed airway obstruction and is also common in elderly patients. Little specific data exist for the treating the elderly asthmatic, thus requiring the clinician to extrapolate from general adult data and asthma treatment guidelines.

AREAS COVERED

A stepwise approach to pharmacotherapy of the elderly patient with asthma and ACOS is offered and the literature supporting the use of each class of drugs reviewed.

EXPERT OPINION

Inhaled, long-acting bronchodilators in combination with inhaled corticosteroids represent the backbone of treatment for the elderly patient with asthma or ACOS . Beyond these medications used as direct bronchodilators and topical anti-inflammatory agents, a stepwise approach to escalation of therapy includes multiple options such as oral leukotriene receptor antagonist or 5-lipoxygense inhibitor therapy, oral phosphodiesterase inhibitors, systemic corticosteroids, oral macrolide antibiotics and if evidence of eosinophilic/atopic component disease exists then modifying monoclonal antibody therapies.

Benefit:Risk Profile of Budesonide in Obstructive Airways Disease

Airway inflammation is a major contributing factor in both asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and represents an important target for treatment. Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) as monotherapy or in combination therapy with long-acting β2-agonists or long-acting muscarinic antagonists are used extensively in the treatment of asthma and COPD. The development of ICS for their anti-inflammatory properties progressed through efforts to increase topical potency and minimise systemic potency and through advances in inhaled delivery technology. Budesonide is a potent, non-halogenated ICS that was developed in the early 1970s and is now one of the most widely used lung medicines worldwide. Inhaled budesonide's physiochemical and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic properties allow it to reach a rapid and high airway efficacy due to its more balanced relationship between water solubility and lipophilicity. When absorbed from the airways and lung tissue, its moderate lipophilicity shortens systemic exposure, and its unique property of intracellular esterification acts like a sustained release mechanism within airway tissues, contributing to its airway selectivity and a low risk of adverse events. There is a large volume of clinical evidence supporting the efficacy and safety of budesonide, both alone and in combination with the fast- and long-acting β2-agonist formoterol, as maintenance therapy in patients with asthma and with COPD. The combination of budesonide/formoterol can also be used as an as-needed reliever with anti-inflammatory properties, with or without regular maintenance for asthma, a novel approach that is already approved by some country-specific regulatory authorities and currently recommended in the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines. Budesonide remains one of the most well-established and versatile of the inhaled anti-inflammatory drugs. This narrative review provides a clinical reappraisal of the benefit:risk profile of budesonide in the management of asthma and COPD.

The association between bronchial asthma and periodontitis: A case-control study in Jordan

OBJECTIVE

Our aim is to study the association between bronchial asthma (BA) and periodontitis in Jordan.

METHODS

A case control study of 260 subjects; 130 with BA and 130 without BA (controls) were recruited at a university hospital in Jordan. BA cases were physician-diagnosed and on anti-asthma medications for 12 months. Periodontitis was defined as the presence of ≥ 4 teeth with ≥ 1 site with probing pocket depth (PPD) ≥ 4 mm and clinical attachment level (CAL) ≥ 3 mm.

RESULTS

Mean age of participants was 45.3 years (range, 18-65) and 58.1% were females. Patients with BA had lower education and tended to live in rural areas. Periodontitis was present in 52 (40.0%) patients with BA and 26 (20.0%) in the control group, p < 0.005. Binary logistic regression indicated that patients with BA were more likely to have periodontitis than controls [adjusted odd ratio (OR) = 2.91, 95% CI (1.39-6.11), p = 0.005]. Patients with BA had higher percentage of sites with: PPD ≥ 3 mm, CAL ≥ 3 mm, and CAL ≥ 4 mm than controls, p < 0.05. The risk of periodontitis [OR = 5.27, 95% CI (1.59-17.51)] and CAL ≥ 3 mm were higher in patients on oral corticosteroids compared to inhaled corticosteroids, p < 0.05.

CONCLUSIONS

Adult Jordanians with bronchial asthma are at higher risk of periodontitis, particularly those on oral corticosteroids. Large and longitudinal studies are needed to better understand this significant association.

Budesonide + formoterol fumarate dihydrate for the treatment of asthma

INTRODUCTION

One of the most widely used fixed combinations in asthma management is dry powder budesonide+formoterol fumarate dihydrate which is commercially available as Symbicort Turbuhaler(®) (and generic products), Easyhaler Bufomix(®) and DuoRespSpiromax(®) inhaler. The aim of this paper was to review the fixed dry powder combination of inhaled budesonide+formoterol fumarate dihydrate for asthma treatment in adolescents and adults.

AREAS COVERED

A literature search using relevant search terms, reference lists for reviews and meta-analyses was performed.

EXPERT OPINION

In symptomatic adolescent and adult patients with asthma maintenance and reliever therapy with a single-inhaler fixed combination of dry powder budesonide+formoterol fumarate dihydrate is an evidenced option. The combination treatment is convenient to patients. It reduces the number of exacerbations requiring treatment with oral corticosteroids. In some patients the strategy may also reduce the total intake of inhaled corticosteroids over time. Whether important outcome measures of asthma treatment, such as hospital admission and emergency room visit rates, may be reduced is less well documented since the published studies may have been influenced by publication bias. Non-pharmaceutical company-sponsored research evaluating such measures is needed. There is no evidence for the use of single inhaler fixed combinations of inhaled corticosteroids+long-acting β(2)-agonists in children (<12 years of age), and budesonide+formoterol fumarate dihydrate should not be prescribed to the age group.

Inhaled corticosteroid and long-acting β2-agonist pharmacological profiles: effective asthma therapy in practice

Fixed-dose combinations of inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) and long-acting β2-agonists (LABAs) have been used to manage asthma for several years. They are the preferred therapy option for patients who do not achieve optimal control of their asthma with low-dose ICS monotherapy. In Europe, four ICS/LABA products are commercially available for asthma maintenance therapy (fluticasone propionate/formoterol fumarate, fluticasone propionate/salmeterol xinafoate, budesonide/formoterol fumarate and beclometasone dipropionate/formoterol fumarate), and other combinations are likely to be developed over the next few years (e.g. mometasone/formoterol fumarate, fluticasone furoate/vilanterol, mometasone/indacaterol). Data from randomized, controlled, clinical trials do not demonstrate a clear overall efficacy difference among ICS/LABA combinations approved for asthma therapy. Conversely, pharmacological data indicate that there may be certain advantages to using one ICS or LABA over another because of the specific pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profiles associated with particular treatments. This review article summarizes the pharmacological characteristics oft he various ICSs and LABAs available for the treatment of asthma, including the potential for ICS and LABA synergy, and gives an insight into the rationale for the development of the latest ICS/LABA combination approved for asthma maintenance therapy.

The emergence of designed multiple ligands for neurodegenerative disorders

The incidence of neurodegenerative diseases has seen a constant increase in the global population, and is likely to be the result of extended life expectancy brought about by better health care. Despite this increase in the incidence of neurodegenerative diseases, there has been a dearth in the introduction of new disease-modifying therapies that are approved to prevent or delay the onset of these diseases, or reverse the degenerative processes in brain. Mounting evidence in the peer-reviewed literature shows that the etiopathology of these diseases is extremely complex and heterogeneous, resulting in significant comorbidity and therefore unlikely to be mitigated by any drug acting on a single pathway or target. A recent trend in drug design and discovery is the rational design or serendipitous discovery of novel drug entities with the ability to address multiple drug targets that form part of the complex pathophysiology of a particular disease state. In this review we discuss the rationale for developing such multifunctional drugs (also called designed multiple ligands or DMLs), and why these drug candidates seem to offer better outcomes in many cases compared to single-targeted drugs in pre-clinical studies for neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease. Examples are drawn from the literature of drug candidates that have already reached the market, some unsuccessful attempts, and others that are still in the drug development pipeline.

Current trends in the treatment of asthma: focus on the simultaneous administration of salmeterol/fluticasone

Asthma is a chronic disease of the airways that affects over 20 million people in the United States. It is a complex disease that involves airway infiltration by different types of cells and cell mediators causing chronic inflammation of the airway as well as hyper-responsiveness and edema. Management of asthma symptoms often requires combination therapy with multiple medications. Long-acting beta-2 agonists and inhaled corticosteroids have become key medications in the prevention of asthma exacerbations. The bronchodilatory effects of the beta-2 agonists coupled with the anti-inflammatory action of the corticosteroids combat the multi-factorial causes of asthma. The combination inhaler containing salmeterol and fluticasone is one such product that has been proven safe and effective for asthma therapy.

Asthma medication - persistence with adrenergics, steroids and combination products over a 5-year period

BACKGROUND

Many patients with asthma underuse steroids for inhalation. This has been identified as a main cause of therapy failure and of excess health care utilization.

OBJECTIVE

To elucidate the medication persistence of patients using asthma drugs, how patients combine the drugs over time and whether medication persistence was influenced by patients switching to combination products.

METHODS

Individual patients' drug acquisition data were obtained from a pharmacy record database for the period 2000-2004. A patient was considered to have satisfactory medication possession ratio (MPR) if the medication supplies covered >or=80% of the prescribed treatment. Drug use profiles were constructed as graphs for each patient, showing the date of each refill and the time period covered by the dispensed drugs. From the graphs the combination of drugs, the continuity of the therapy over time and the MPR for each patient could be determined.

RESULTS

Of 1812 patients with asthma drugs in the database, 815 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The percentage of patients with satisfactory MPR was low (11-27%), but significantly higher among patients using combination products than among those using steroids. For patients who switched from adrenergics plus steroids in two inhalers to combination products in one inhaler, the number of patients with satisfactory MPR was significantly increased.

CONCLUSION

Satisfactory MPR was low for all types of asthma drugs. More patients had satisfactory MPR with combination products in one inhaler than with adrenergics and steroids in two separate inhalers. Asthma drug-delivery is important and combination products of the two ingredients could therefore improve asthma therapy.

Control of asthma in children: still unacceptable? A French cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

The goal of asthma management focuses on adequate control of asthma, although little is known about the optimal level of asthma control to be reached. The ELIOS study was conducted in France to address this lack of information.

METHODS

Cross-sectional study of asthmatic children (4-15 years) visiting their medical practitioner. The primary objective was to assess the level of asthma control with a 3-level composite score based on French (ANAES) guidelines criteria (optimal, acceptable, and unacceptable).

RESULTS

Asthma control was assessed in 3431 children and classified as optimal (26%), acceptable (41.3%), and unacceptable (32.7%). When PEFR was studied, asthma control was optimal in 23.0%, acceptable in 35.8% and unacceptable in 41.2% (p<0.001) of children. Unacceptable asthma control was significantly associated with higher BMI (p=0.002), more recent diagnosis of asthma (p=0.008), passive exposure to parental tobacco smoke (p<0.001), number of associated allergic diseases (p<0.001), frequent respiratory tract infections (p<0.001) and low socioeconomic status (p<0.001). Multivariate analysis identified presence of respiratory tract infections (p<0.0001), passive exposure to parental tobacco smoke (p=0.009) and low socioeconomic status (p=0.042) as variables associated with unacceptable asthma control.

CONCLUSIONS

There is room for improvement in France as only 25% of asthmatic children are optimally controlled. Public health strategies should increase awareness among physicians and parents about the importance of using asthma control tools, eliminating exposure to tobacco smoke and treating associated allergic diseases.

Patient-reported outcomes among omalizumab and salmeterol/fluticasone combination therapy patients

BACKGROUND

Some asthma patients remain poorly controlled despite receiving care consistent with treatment guidelines.

OBJECTIVE

This study compared the ability to sleep, work, and participate in leisure activities among subjects with immunoglobulin E-mediated (allergic) asthma initiating omalizumab (omalizumab start group) with subjects receiving moderate-to-high doses of salmeterol/fluticasone combination therapy, who continued on salmeterol/fluticasone combination therapy for at least a year without adding omalizumab (salmeterol/fluticasone combination continuation group).

METHODS

Subjects completed an Internet-based screener and, if eligible, an Internet-based questionnaire. A propensity score model was utilized in the analysis. Group differences were assessed through logistic and linear regression models. Analyses were adjusted for propensity score quintile, how subjects heard about the study, and responses to retrospective single-item questions.

RESULTS

The analysis population included 86 omalizumab start group subjects and 436 salmeterol/fluticasone combination continuation subjects, recruited from June to November 2006. In the adjusted analyses, the omalizumab start group was more than twice as likely to have controlled asthma as measured by the Asthma Control Test (odds ratio, 2.62; p = 0.005). The omalizumab start group had significantly fewer sleep disturbances as measured by the Jenkins Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (least-square means difference, -1.65;p = 0.004), less activity impairment as measured by the Work Productivity Activity Impairment-Asthma Scale (least-square means difference, -13.36;p < 0.001), and less difficulty in activities as measured by the Valued Life Activities Questionnaire (least-square means difference, -0.24; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Asthma subjects who started taking omalizumab reported more improvement in asthma control, fewer sleep problems, less activity impairment, and less difficulty with activities than a similar cohort of subjects who continued taking salmeterol/fluticasone combination therapy.

Tolerability of high cumulative doses of the HFA modulite beclomethasone dipropionate/formoterol combination inhaler in asthmatic patients

The corticosteroid beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) has been formulated with the long acting beta agonist formoterol (BDP/formoterol 100 microg/6 microg, Foster) in a single inhaler using Modulite technology. We have investigated the acute tolerability of high, cumulative doses of BDP/formoterol compared to formoterol alone and placebo. This was a double blind, 3-way cross-over comparison of 10 puffs of BDP/formoterol 100 microg/6 microg or formoterol 6 microg or placebo during maintenance treatment with BDP/formoterol two puffs per day. Pharmacokinetics over 12h during maintenance treatment was measured on day 7. High cumulative doses were then administered on three separated days. Eighteen patients with asthma were recruited (mean FEV(1) 65% predicted). The primary endpoint was serum potassium over the 12h period after high doses. QTc, blood pressure and heart rate over 12h, and plasma lactate and glucose over 3h following dosing were assessed. Formoterol caused a significantly greater decrease in serum potassium than BDP/formoterol or placebo (difference in mean minimum concentrations; 0.11 and -0.15 mmol/l, respectively, p<0.05 for both comparisons). No significant differences in serum potassium parameters were found between BDP/formoterol and placebo. QTc, plasma lactate and vital signs values observed with the combination were not statistically different from those with formoterol alone. For glucose, the mean maximum increase after formoterol treatment was 0.4 mmol/l (p<0.01 compared to placebo), while BDP/formoterol treatment caused a maximum increase of 0.7 mmol/l (p<0.01 compared to formoterol and placebo). The active metabolite of BDP is beclomethasone-17-monopropriate (B17MP), which reached Cmax at 0.25 h, with an elimination half-life of 3.7 h. Formoterol also reached Cmax at 0.25 h, and concentrations were measurable up to 12 h. High doses of BDP/formoterol did not significantly reduce serum potassium, while formoterol alone did to a greater extent. The BDP/formoterol combination was well tolerated, and exhibited a safety profile generally similar to formoterol alone when administered in high doses to stable asthmatic patients.

Tolerability profiles of leukotriene receptor antagonists and long-acting beta2-adrenoceptor agonists in combination with inhaled corticosteroids for treatment of asthma: a review

Inhaled corticosteroids, long-acting beta2-adrenoceptor agonists, and leukotriene receptor antagonists are widely used for treatment of asthma. Inhaled corticosteroids are recommended as first-line therapy, whereas long-acting beta2-adrenoceptor agonists and leukotriene receptor antagonists are indicated as add-on therapy in patients not adequately controlled with corticosteroids alone. A number of studies have investigated the efficacy of combinations of these drugs in asthma, but several issues concerning the safety of these treatments are highly debated. This review provides a critical appraisal of the tolerability profiles of long-acting beta2-agonists and leukotriene receptor antagonists used in combination with inhaled corticosteroids for the treatment of asthma.