Racial and ethnic disparities in meeting MTM eligibility criteria among patients with asthma

Racial and ethnic disparities related to the Medicare Part D Medication Therapy Management Program

Medicare's Part D Medication Therapy Management (MTM) programs serve approximately 4.5 million eligible beneficiaries. Prior research suggested that the thresholds to enter Part D MTM programs would disproportionately favor White beneficiaries compared with Black or Hispanic beneficiaries. This article summarizes those initial studies and compares the results with more recent analyses of racial and ethnic differences in MTM program enrollment, which, in general, show higher odds of MTM enrollment for minority beneficiaries compared with White beneficiaries. Disparities in the utilization of comprehensive medication review (CMR), a core MTM service, are also discussed. Although trends vary, disparities exist for various minority groups. For example, Black beneficiaries and Hispanic beneficiaries are less likely to be offered a CMR compared with White beneficiaries. Additionally, minority (Asian, Hispanic, and North American Native) beneficiaries are less likely to receive a CMR after being offered the service compared with White beneficiaries. Black, Hispanic, and Asian beneficiaries are more likely than White beneficiaries to have a longer duration between MTM enrollment and CMR offer. There is also a distinct difference in the type of pharmacist (ie, plan pharmacist, MTM vendor pharmacist, or community pharmacist) completing the CMR for certain racial and ethnic groups. For example, compared with White beneficiaries, Black beneficiaries were less likely to receive a CMR from a community pharmacist, whereas Asian beneficiaries were more likely.

Impact of medication therapy management programs on potentially inappropriate medication use in older adults: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

The use of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) is prevalent, costly, and harmful for older adults. These medications are to be avoided among older adults because they generally have (1) a high risk of adverse events in this population and/or (2) limited evidence of benefits in the presence of safer or more effective alternatives. Medication therapy management (MTM) programs can help address PIM use; however, there has not been a synthesis of studies examining the impact of MTM programs on PIM use.

OBJECTIVE

To review published literature evaluating the impact of MTM on PIM use in older adults.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines using MEDLINE (PubMed) studies were included if they (1) had a Medicare population, (2) were based in the United States, (3) examined an MTM program (ie, used the term "medication therapy management"), (4) focused on the impact of MTM programs on PIM use as the primary outcome, (5) had a randomized controlled trial or an observational study design, and (6) were available in English.

RESULTS

Of 221 articles identified, 31 full-text articles were assessed, and 7 met all inclusion and exclusion criteria. The studies took place in various settings, ranging from single-site tertiary medical centers to multisite outpatient clinics, community pharmacies, and nationwide telehealth MTM providers. Patient populations were majority female sex (ranging from 61% to 71%) and majority White (ranging from 81% to 94%), with a mean age of 73 to 78 years. In 5 of the 7 studies, MTM reduced the use of PIMs; however, 3 did not adjust for confounding or apply a comparator group. Measurement of MTM impacts on PIM use varied across studies. Patient-level and plan-level studies mostly assessed shorter-term PIM usage reduction (4 months or less), whereas studies performed at the provider and institutional level assessed PIM usage reduction trends across consecutive measurement years.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the current limited evidence, MTM programs in older adults appear to have a positive impact on reducing PIM use. However, evidence was limited by study design, the lack of consistency in outcome measures, and a short follow-up period. Future work should adjust for confounding, apply comparator groups, include longer-term outcomes, and develop a core set of measures that can be consistently applied across studies.

Racial and ethnic disparities in the enrolment of medicare medication therapy management programs

Objectives

Racial/ethnic disparities have been found in prior literature examining enrolment in Medicare medication therapy management programs. However, those studies were based on various eligibility scenarios because enrolment data were unavailable. This study tested for potential disparities in enrolment using actual MTM enrolment data.

Methods

Medicare Parts A&B claims, Medication Therapy Management Data Files, and the Area Health Resources File from 2013 to 2014 and 2016 to 2017 were analysed in this retrospective analysis. An adjusted logistic regression compared odds of enrolment between racial/ethnic minorities and non-Hispanic Whites (Whites) in the total sample and subpopulations with diabetes, hypertension, or hyperlipidaemia. Trends in disparities were analysed by including interaction terms in regressions between dummy variables for race/ethnic minority groups and period 2016-2017.

Key Findings

Disparities in MTM enrolment were detected between Blacks and Whites with diabetes in 2013-2014 (Odds Ratio = 0.78, 95% Confidence Interval = 0.75-0.81). This disparity improved from 2013-2014 to 2016-2017 for Blacks (Odds Ratio=1.08, 95% Confidence Interval = 1.04-1.11) but persisted in 2016-2017 (Odds Ratio = 0.84, 95% Confidence Interval = 0.81-0.87). A disparity was identified between Blacks and Whites with hypertension in 2013-2014 (Odds Ratio = 0.92, 95% Confidence Interval = 0.89-0.95) but not in 2016-2017. Enrolment for all groups, however, declined between periods. For example, in the total sample, the odds of enrolment declined from 2013-2014 to 2016-2017 by 22% (Odds Ratio=0.78, 95% Confidence Interval=0.75-0.81).

Conclusions

Racial disparities in MTM enrolment were found between Blacks and Whites among Medicare beneficiaries with diabetes in both periods and among individuals with hypertension in 2013-2014. As overall enrolment fell between periods, concerns about program enrolment remain.

A Qualitative Analysis to Understand Perception about Medication-Related Problems among Older Minority Adults in a Historically Black Community

Older adults taking multiple chronic medications experience an increased risk of adverse drug events and other medication-related problems (MRP). Most current literature on medication management involves researcher-driven intervention, yet few studies investigate patients' understanding of MRP in a diverse community setting. This report investigates patients' perception of MRP and patient-centered strategies among a cohort of the older adult group in a historically Black urban community. The study design is qualitative using structured open-ended questions in a multidisciplinary patient-centered focus group. Patients (age 65 years or older) taking seven or more medications were recruited. The group comprises patients, caregivers, pharmacists, health educators, a physician, and a nurse. Recordings of the group discussion are transcribed verbatim and analyzed using thematic content analysis and categorized by codes developed from the social-ecological model. The group reports patient-provider relationships, previous experience, fear of side effects played important roles in medication adherence. There is an unmet need for medication management education and tools to organize complex medication lists from multiple providers. This study provides important insights into MRP experienced by minority older adults and provided researchers with potential strategies for future interventions.

Health disparities in allergic and immunologic conditions in racial and ethnic underserved populations: A Work Group Report of the AAAAI Committee on the Underserved

Health disparities are health differences linked with economic, social, and environmental disadvantage. They adversely affect groups that have systematically experienced greater social or economic obstacles to health. Renewed efforts are needed to reduced health disparities in the United States, highlighted by the disparate impact on racial minorities during the coronavirus pandemic. Institutional or systemic patterns of racism are promoted and legitimated through accepted societal standards, and organizational processes within the field of medicine, and contribute to health disparities. Herein, we review current evidence regarding health disparities in allergic rhinitis, asthma, atopic dermatitis, food allergy, drug allergy, and primary immune deficiency disease in racial and ethnic underserved populations. Best practices to address these disparities involve addressing social determinants of health and adopting policies to improve access to specialty care and treatment for the underserved through telemedicine and community partnerships, cross-cultural provider training to reduce implicit bias, inclusion of underserved patients in research, implementation of culturally competent patient education, and recruitment and training of health care providers from underserved communities. Addressing health disparities requires a multilevel approach involving patients, health providers, local agencies, professional societies, and national governmental agencies.

Evolution of the Medicare Part D Medication Therapy Management Program from Inception in 2006 to the Present

BACKGROUND

In 2006, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) implemented the newly established Medicare Part D program that required plan sponsors to offer a medication therapy management (MTM) program. The MTM program requirements have become more prescriptive over the past decade in the attempt to address low beneficiary enrollment rates, improve the quality of services provided, and address gaps in meeting the needs of enrollees.

OBJECTIVE

To describe changes to the requirements for the Medicare Part D MTM program since its inception in 2006 and the impact of these changes to inform future program enhancements.

METHODS

We obtained publicly available information extracted from the Medicare Part D MTM program fact sheets for the years 2008 through 2018, in addition to searching indexed literature through PubMed and additional literature through Internet searches. We then categorized the program's requirement changes annually, and described the Part D MTM program characteristics and reported statistics.

DISCUSSION

Significant changes to the Part D MTM program requirements occurred in 2010, 2013, and 2016 regarding eligibility criteria, MTM services, and reporting requirements. Thresholds to determine beneficiary eligibility have been lowered. Specific MTM services now include an annual comprehensive medication review, followed by a written summary using the Standardized Format. Quarterly targeted medication reviews are also required. Reporting requirements now include comprehensive medication review completion rates and the number of prescriber interventions, among others. Despite more prescriptive MTM program requirements, the low utilization of the MTM program continues.

CONCLUSION

Low beneficiary enrollment rates in the Medicare Part D MTM program led CMS to lower thresholds required for eligibility to expand the beneficiary pool. More prescriptive MTM service requirements enhanced service standardization. Despite these changes, MTM enrollment and comprehensive medication review rates remain low, likely, in part, from a lack of financial incentives. The Enhanced MTM program is a 5-year test model that is providing participating Part D plans regulatory flexibility and financial incentives to design their own MTM programs, to evaluate the impact of different program designs on beneficiary engagement and outcomes.

Predicting admissions for adult asthma exacerbations in North Texas

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to provide a picture of asthma disparities and the contributions of social and environmental factors to asthma exacerbations in the north central region of Texas, where intense, rapid development is a feature of contemporary life.

DESIGN AND SAMPLE

Cross-sectional analysis of data associated with 66 hospitals in the 8 counties containing and surrounding the Dallas/Fort Worth metropolitan area. Census blocks containing adult asthma patients admitted to emergency departments (ED) or inpatient units for asthma exacerbations in 2014.

MEASURES

Data for secondary analysis were collected from the Dallas Fort Worth Hospital Council Foundation.

RESULTS

Sex, family income, education, race, age of housing, speed, and traffic density on neighborhood roads affected asthma admissions. Proximity to urban drilling sites had only a small effect on admissions in this sample. Minorities were significantly more likely to obtain services in the ED than whites.

CONCLUSIONS

Attributes associated with poor and underserved patients predicted asthma exacerbations in the target region. These are vulnerable patients who can ill afford further erosion of health care insurance or additional environmental insults.

The impact of racial and ethnic disparities in inhaled corticosteroid adherence on healthcare expenditures in adults with asthma

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to determine racial and ethnic disparities with the adherence to inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) in adults with persistent asthma, and their association with healthcare expenditures. Methods: A retrospective, cross-sectional study using the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) 2013-2014 data included patients ≥18 years with persistent asthma. Median medication possession ratio (MPR) was used to dichotomize adherence levels. Multivariate regression analysis was conducted to ascertain the association between adherence and race/ethnicity. Total expenditures and association with adherence were analyzed using a generalized linear model with a log link function and gamma distribution. Unadjusted expenditures were compared after bootstrapping. Results: The average MPR of ICSs for the sample of 277 patients was 0.34. The average MPR level was 0.33 among whites, 0.37 among African-Americans and 0.35 among other minorities. The average MPR was 0.30 among Hispanics, and 0.35 among non-Hispanics. African-Americans were less likely to be adherent than whites (OR 0.95). Hispanics were less likely to be adherent (OR 0.4; CI 0.206-0.777). Higher adherence was associated with significantly higher total health expenditure than lower adherence ($19,223 vs. $12,840 respectively, p < .0001). African-Americans had slightly higher total expenditure compared to whites; however, other minorities had significantly lower health expenditures compared to whites (p = .01). Non-Hispanics spent significantly less on healthcare compared to Hispanics (p = .04). Conclusions: Valuable insight into the economic cost of the disparities as they relate to persistent asthma provides further evidence of possible ethnic inequities that warrant addressing.

Racial disparities in asthma-related health care use in the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's Severe Asthma Research Program

BACKGROUND

Despite advances in asthma care, disparities persist. Black patients are disproportionally affected by asthma and also have poorer outcomes compared with white patients.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine associations between black and white patients and asthma-related health care use, accounting for complex relationships.

METHODS

This study was completed as part of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's Severe Asthma Research Program, a prospective observational cohort. Between November 2012 and February 2015, it enrolled 579 participants 6 years and older with 1 year of observation time and complete data. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to balance racial groups with respect to community and family socioeconomic variables and environmental exposure variables. The primary outcome was emergency department (ED) use for asthma. Secondary outcomes included inhaled corticosteroid use, outpatient physician's office visits for asthma, and asthma-related hospitalization.

RESULTS

Black patients had greater odds of ED use over 1 year (odds ratio, 2.19; 95% CI, 1.43-3.35) but also differed in the majority (>50%) of baseline variables measured. After statistical balancing of the racial groups, the difference between black and white patients with respect to ED use no longer reached the level of significance. Instead, in secondary analyses black patients were less likely to see an outpatient physician for asthma management (adjusted odds ratio, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.38-0.85).

CONCLUSIONS

The disparity in ED use was eliminated after consideration of multiple variables. Social and environmental policies and interventions tailored to black populations with a high burden of asthma are critical to reduction (or elimination) of these disparities.

Predictive Value Positive of MTM Eligibility Criteria under MMA and ACA in Identifying Individuals with Medication Utilization Issues

OBJECTIVES

To compare the predictive value positives (PVP) of medication therapy management eligibility criteria under the Medicare Modernization Act (MMA) and Affordable Care Act (ACA) in identifying individuals with medication utilization issues (MUI).

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of Medicare database (2012-2013). MUI were determined based on medication utilization measures related to Medicare Part D Star Ratings. PVP or proportions of individuals with MUI were compared between individuals eligible for MTM under MMA and ACA. Need-based and demand-based logistic regression was used to adjust for patient characteristics. MTM eligibility thresholds in 2009 and 2013 and proposed 2015 MTM eligibility thresholds under MMA were examined. Main/sensitivity/disease-specific analyses were conducted to cover the range of eligibility thresholds and combinations.

KEY FINDINGS

MMA has higher PVP in identifying patients with MUI than ACA. Proportions of individuals with MUI were higher based on MMA than ACA (e.g., 74.96% for 2009 MMA, 73.51% for 2013 MMA, and 62.46% for proposed 2015 MMA vs. 52.17% for ACA in main analysis; P<0.05). Adjusted findings were similar. For example, based on the demand-based model in the main analysis, the odds ratios were 2.474 (95% CI: 2.454-2.494) for 2013 MMA in comparison to ACA. These numbers indicate that the MMA MTM eligibility criteria for 2013 had 147.4% higher PVP in identifying patients with MUI than ACA. Similar patterns were found in most sensitivity and disease-specific analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

MMA has higher PVP than ACA in identifying patients with MUI. This study may inform the government on future MTM policy.

Higher Predictive Value Positive for MMA Than ACA MTM Eligibility Criteria Among Racial and Ethnic Minorities: An Observational Study

The objective of this study was to examine positive predictive value (PPV) of medication therapy management (MTM) eligibility criteria under Medicare Modernization Act (MMA) and Affordable Care Act (ACA) in identifying patients with medication utilization issues across racial and ethnic groups. The study analyzed Medicare data (2012-2013) for 2 213 594 beneficiaries. Medication utilization issues were determined based on medication utilization measures mostly developed by Pharmacy Quality Alliance. MMA was associated with higher PPV than ACA in identifying individuals with medication utilization issues among non-Hispanic blacks (blacks) and Hispanics than non-Hispanic whites (whites). For example, odds ratio for having medication utilization issues to whites when examining MMA in 2013 and ACA were 1.09 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.04-1.15) among blacks, and 1.17 (95% CI = 1.10-1.24) among Hispanics, in the main analysis. Therefore, MMA was associated with 9% and 17% higher PPV than ACA in identifying patients with medication utilization issues among blacks and Hispanics, respectively, than whites.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Meeting MTM Eligibility Criteria Based on Star Ratings Compared with the Medicare Modernization Act

BACKGROUND

Previous research found racial and ethnic disparities in meeting medication therapy management (MTM) eligibility criteria implemented by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) in accordance with the Medicare Modernization Act (MMA).

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether alternative MTM eligibility criteria based on the CMS Part D star ratings quality evaluation system can reduce racial and ethnic disparities.

METHODS

This study analyzed the Beneficiary Summary File and claims files for Medicare beneficiaries linked to the Area Health Resource File. Three million Medicare beneficiaries with continuous Parts A, B, and D enrollment in 2012-2013 were included. Proposed star ratings criteria included 9 existing medication safety and adherence measures developed mostly by the Pharmacy Quality Alliance. Logistic regression and the Blinder-Oaxaca approach were used to test disparities in meeting MMA and star ratings eligibility criteria across racial and ethnic groups. Multinomial logistic regression was used to examine whether there was a disparity reduction by comparing individuals who were MTM-eligible under MMA but not under star ratings criteria and those who were MTM-eligible under star ratings criteria but not under the MMA. Concerning MMA-based MTM criteria, main and sensitivity analyses were performed to represent the entire range of the MMA eligibility thresholds reported by plans in 2009, 2013, and proposed by CMS in 2015. Regarding star ratings criteria, meeting any 1 of the 9 measures was examined as the main analysis, and various measure combinations were examined as the sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS

In the main analysis, adjusted odds ratios for non-Hispanic blacks (backs) and Hispanics to non-Hispanic whites (whites) were 1.394 (95% CI = 1.375-1.414) and 1.197 (95% CI = 1.176-1.218), respectively, under star ratings. Blacks were 39.4% and Hispanics were 19.7% more likely to be MTM-eligible than whites. Blacks and Hispanics were less likely to be MTM-eligible than whites in some sensitivity analyses. Disparities were not completely explained by differences in patient characteristics based on the Blinder-Oaxaca approach. The multinomial logistic regression of each main analysis found significant adjusted relative risk ratios (RRR) between whites and blacks for 2009 (RRR = 0.459, 95% CI = 0.438-0.481); 2013 (RRR = 0.449, 95% CI = 0.434-0.465); and 2015 (RRR = 0.436, 95% CI = 0.425-0.446) and between whites and Hispanics for 2009 (RRR = 0.559, 95% CI = 0.528-0.593); 2013 (RRR = 0.544, 95% CI = 0.521-0.569); and 2015 (RRR = 0.503, 95% CI = 0.488-0.518). These findings indicate a significant reduction in racial and ethnic disparities when using star ratings eligibility criteria; for example, black-white disparities in the likelihood of meeting MTM eligibility criteria were reduced by 55.1% based on star ratings compared with MMA in 2013. Similar patterns were found in most sensitivity and disease-specific analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found that minorities were more likely than whites to be MTM-eligible under the star ratings criteria. In addition, MTM eligibility criteria based on star ratings would reduce racial and ethnic disparities associated with MMA in the general Medicare population and those with specific chronic conditions.

DISCLOSURES

Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute on Aging of the National Institutes of Health under award number R01AG049696. The content of this study is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. Cushman reports an Eli Lilly grant and uncompensated consulting for Takeda Pharmaceuticals outside this work. The other authors have no potential conflicts of interest to report. Study concept and design were contributed by Wang and Shih, along with Wan, Kuhle, Spivey, and Cushman. Wang, Qiao, and Wan took the lead in data collection, with assistance from the other authors. Data interpretation was performed by Wang, Kuhle, and Qiao, with assistance from the other authors. The manuscript was written by Spivey and Qiao, along with the other authors, and revised by Cushman, Dagogo-Jack, and Chisholm-Burns, along with the other authors.

Predictors of emergency department use in children with persistent asthma in metropolitan Atlanta, Georgia

BACKGROUND

Racial disparities are evident among children with asthma in the United States, with non-Hispanic black children at particularly high risk for poor asthma outcomes, including frequent emergency department (ED) use for asthma exacerbations.

OBJECTIVE

To compare asthma features in non-Hispanic black vs white children in Atlanta, Georgia, and determine what clinical features predict future ED use for asthma.

METHODS

Self-reported black and white children 6 to 17 years of age with persistent asthma treated with controller medications completed medical history questionnaires, lung function testing, aeroallergen sensitization testing, and venipuncture. Medical records were reviewed for asthma-related ED visits for 12 months after the initial study visit.

RESULTS

A total of 276 children were enrolled. Black children, compared with white children, resided in more disadvantaged zip code areas and were more likely to have public insurance. Black children also had more features of asthma severity and more ED visits during the study period. Predictors of ED use, aside from a previous ED visit, differed by race. After adjustment for socioeconomic status, predictors of ED use in white children included an ED visit in the previous year and sensitization to pets and dust; in black children, predictors included ED use in the previous year, the number of asthma controller medications, forced expiratory volume in 1 second less than 80% predicted, blood eosinophil count greater than 4%, and mold sensitization.

CONCLUSION

Asthma features and ED use differ between black and white children in metropolitan Atlanta. Strategies to eliminate allergen exposure in the home and improve asthma control in these children may require tailoring for different racial groups.