Inhaled corticosteroid prescribing in a pediatric emergency department: Sustained success and prescription filling rates

A Dedicated Outpatient Pharmacy Improves Access to Discharge Medications in a Pediatric Emergency Department: A Quality Improvement Study

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Following discharge from a pediatric emergency department (ED) or urgent care, many families do not pick up their prescribed medications. The aim of this quality improvement study was to increase the percentage of patients discharged home with medications in-hand from 6% to 30% within 6 months.

METHODS

Due to the planned construction of a new ED, urgent care, and dedicated pharmacy, a multidisciplinary team was formed to increase access to discharge medications. We performed a pilot study in the urgent care to improve the discharge prescription process and expanded its scope to the ED. We evaluated the effect of our interventions on the percentage of patients discharged with medications in-hand through statistical process control charts. Process measures included the percentage of prescriptions electronically prescribed and directed to an on-site pharmacy.

RESULTS

Between June 21, 2021 and March 27, 2022, 7,678 patients were discharged with at least 1 medication in-hand. The percentage of patients discharged with medications in-hand increased from 6.2% to 60.6%. The percentage of prescriptions e-prescribed and directed to an on-site pharmacy increased to 94.6% and 65.6% respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, the availability of a 24-hour on-site pharmacy appears to be the most impactful intervention increasing access to discharge medications for families. Other interventions, such as a pilot study in the urgent care and implementing default electronic prescribing, may have potentiated the effect of the new pharmacy.

A Randomized Controlled Study Addressing Dexamethasone Tolerability in the Treatment of Acute Asthma in Children: Mary Poppins on Trial!

AIM

Emesis of oral medications continues to be a problem in the management of acute pediatric asthma exacerbations; therefore, we set out to assess whether smaller volumes of oral dexamethasone resulted in better tolerability.

METHODS

Children aged 2-14 years, presenting to the emergency department with acute asthma exacerbation, were enrolled in this open, prospective randomized controlled trial. Participants received 0.3 mg/kg of dexamethasone in either its concentrated volume (10 mg/mL) or mixed with Ora Sweet (1 mg/mL). Tolerability was measured by vomiting within 45 minutes of receiving dexamethasone, with stratification, a priori, for prior vomiting.

RESULTS

430 participants were enrolled. 23/213 (11%) in the 10 mg/mL group vomited dexamethasone compared to 16/217 (7%) in the 1 mg/mL group (P = .29). 11/179 (6%) in the 10 mg/mL group vomited compared to 8/183 (3%) in the 1 mg/mL group (.61). For those 68 stratified with prior vomiting, 12/34 (35%) in the 10 mg/mL group vomited compared to 8/34 (24%) in the 1 mg/mL group (P = .43). None of these results were statistically different. Prior vomiting increased the risk of vomiting, regardless of the formulation given (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Volume does not play a significant role in the tolerability of dexamethasone. Therefore, palatability should not be sacrificed for a smaller volume of dexamethasone to improve tolerability.

Use of a validated asthma questionnaire to increase inhaled corticosteroid prescribing in the pediatric emergency department

BACKGROUND

Asthma guidelines recommend assessment of asthma control and treatment with an ICS when appropriate. Children seen for asthma in the ED often have poorly controlled asthma. Validated questionnaires are rarely used in the ED and ICS are prescribed at less than 5% of ED asthma encounters, leaving many children at risk for continued poor outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To determine if use of a validated asthma questionnaire can increase the proportion of children who receive an ICS prescription during an ED asthma visit.

METHODS

We administered a validated asthma questionnaire (Pediatric Asthma Control and Communication Instrument-ED version [PACCI-ED]) to parents of children 2 - 17 years old presenting for asthma care at a large, urban, academic pediatric ED. Based on national asthma guidelines, the PACCI-ED results were used to determine ICS dose recommendations. ED physicians reviewed the PACCI-ED results and ICS dose recommendations and chose whether to prescribe an ICS upon discharge. ICS prescribing rates during the intervention period were assessed via medical record review and compared to historical controls. We also surveyed parents to examine the association of sociodemographic factors with receipt of an ICS prescription, and surveyed physicians regarding their prescribing decisions.

RESULTS

Thirteen physicians and seventy-nine children participated. Historically, the ICS prescribing rate for asthma exacerbations discharged from the ED was 13%. The intervention increased ICS prescribing to 56% (p < 0.001). Children with ≥2 asthma exacerbations in the prior year (p < 0.02) and those with moderate-severe persistent asthma (p < 0.02) were more likely to receive an ICS prescription. There were no statistically significant differences in ICS prescribing by sociodemographic characteristics.

CONCLUSION

A validated asthma questionnaire increased ICS prescribing for children presenting for to the ED for asthma care. Additional strategies are needed to promote prescribing in this setting and ensure that all eligible children receive guideline-based asthma care.

The effect of a coaching program on asthma control and health care utilization in children with asthma

ABSRACTObjective: Poor adherence to asthma therapy is a major problem in the management of asthma. We aimed to assess if a designed coaching program in children with asthma, coming from low socioeconomic background, will reduce respiratory morbidity and health care utilization.Methods: A prospective interventional pilot study enrolling children aged 3-18 years, admitted to Soroka University Medical Center (SUMC) between October 2015 and May 2016 due to asthma exacerbation. The intervention group was part of a coaching program, which was conducted by medical and paramedical personnel and included a diagnostic and personal educational office visit and a house visit by a nurse educator for asthma. The control group comprised of demographically matched children with asthma, who were admitted to the SUMC, but did not go through any intervention. Medications purchase and health care utilization were extracted from the participants' HMO databases, during 1-year of follow-up.Results: 41 children were enrolled to the intervention group, with 63 children as a control group. No differences were found in asthma-related drugs purchase, number of clinic visits, ER admissions and hospitalizations during the follow-up year, although the intervention group showed a trend towards having a shorter length of stay (2.3 vs. 4.5 days, Cohen's D = 0.44, p = 0.06). The intervention group demonstrated subjective improvement in asthma control, as reflected in Asthma Control Test questionnaires.Conclusions: In this pilot study of coaching program for children with asthma coming from low income families, no decrease in health care utilization was shown. Larger and longer intervention programs are needed.

Inhaled corticosteroids prescriptions increased in the ED for recurrent asthma exacerbations by automated electronic reminders in the ED

Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of an electronic alert on the prescription rate of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) by ED providers for poorly controlled persistent asthmatic children.Methods: Study subjects included asthmatic patients age 4-18 presenting to the ED at Phenix Children's Hospital between February 9, 2018 and December 4, 2018, with a history of at least two previous ED visits for acute exacerbation of asthma within 365 days, no active ICS prescription within 90 days, and free from developmental delay, bronchopulmonary dysplasia due to prematurity, cystic fibrosis, sickle cell disease, and/or interstitial ling disease. Patients meeting these criteria triggered an electronic alert prompting the medical provider to prescribe ICS or indicate reason for not prescribing. Instruction on the alert was provided to ED attending physicians and residents by email and through several educational sessions held prior to the implementation.Results: Among 62 patients without prior ICS who were discharged home from the ED, ICS was prescribed for 48 (77%). No statistically significant differences were detected in baseline characteristics between patients discharged home from the ED with and without ICS prescription. While ICS was prescribed by a larger proportion of physicians (56%) compared to residents (42%), statistical significance was not reached. For the 14 (33%) patients who were discharged home without ICS, no reason was provided to indicate why ICS were not prescribed.Conclusion: An electronic alert incorporated into the ED workflow to populate a discharge order set is effective to initiate asthma controller medication for poorly controlled pediatric patients. Additional data describing reasons for not prescribing ICS can further refine recommendations for ICS prescriptions, and provide a comprehensive strategy to support clinical decision for pediatric asthma control in acute care settings.