Effects of replacing PSA with Stockholm3 for diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in a healthcare system - the Stavanger experience

The association between patient characteristics, psychological distress, and coping in the diagnostic phase of prostate cancer - A cross-sectional multicenter study

PURPOSE

This study aims to investigate the associations between patient characteristics, psychological distress, and coping in the diagnostic phase of prostate cancer.

METHODS

A cross-sectional multicentre study was conducted from 2017 to 2019. A total of 250 patients were recruited from three hospitals in western Norway. The patients completed a questionnaire while awaiting their prostate biopsy. Patient characteristics were collected, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the Revised Ways of Coping Checklist were used to measure psychological distress and evaluate coping strategies and primary appraisal, respectively.

RESULTS

Approximately 15% and 5% of the patients experienced symptoms of anxiety and depression, respectively. Younger age and poorer self-reported health were associated with higher anxiety levels. Anxiety was associated with all five coping strategies but showed the strongest correlation with wishful thinking. The patients who appraised their situation as a threat experienced more symptoms of both anxiety and depression and used more wishful thinking and avoidance than did the patients who appraised their situation as a challenge or benign.

CONCLUSION

A subgroup of patients experiences psychological distress during diagnostic evaluation of prostate cancer. Age, self-reported health, and primary appraisal may contribute to the development of psychological distress. Identification of patient characteristics associated with higher levels of psychological distress may guide nurses in implementing early interventions aimed at supporting beneficial coping and enhancing well-being.

Cost Analysis of Prostate Cancer Care Using a Biomarker-enhanced Diagnostic Strategy with Stockholm3

Background and objective

Building on previous research demonstrating better prostate cancer (PC) diagnostics via a biomarker-enhanced approach, this study focuses on cost analysis of PC care using the Stockholm3 test. We assessed the economic impact in European health care systems using real-world evidence for diagnostic outcomes and relevant costs.

Methods

We evaluated two PC diagnostic strategies: (1) the conventional prostate-specific antigen (PSA) strategy with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and (2) PSA testing with a reflex to biomarkers at PSA ≥1.5 ng/ml in guiding decisions to perform MRI. Data from the Swedish National Prostate Cancer Register and Capio St. Göran Hospital provided real-world evidence, supplemented by health economic modeling. A comprehensive cost analysis was conducted using a Markov model for treatment pathways for four PC disease states and overall spending, for which costs from various European health care systems were used. A deterministic sensitivity analysis was performed across different cost and diagnostic scenarios.

Key finding and limitations

The average cost for the four disease states was €2 182 for benign disease, €10 023 for low-grade disease, €13 073 for intermediate- to high-grade localized or locally advance disease, and €271 210 for metastatic disease. The overall spending was €358 239 (7.7%) lower per 1000 men tested in the biomarker-enhanced strategy in comparison to the PSA strategy. The primary cost saving was attributed to lower treatment expenses for metastatic disease. Sensitivity analysis affirmed the robustness of the findings across various diagnostic and treatment scenarios.

Conclusions and clinical implications

Biomarker-enhanced diagnostic strategies may reduce health care costs for PC management and are likely to improve quality-adjusted life years in a scenario in which metastatic disease is reduced.

Patient summary

We explored different ways to detect prostate cancer more cost-effectively. We found that using a specific blood test, called Stockholm3, after a PSA (prostate-specific antigen) test to decide if an MRI scan (magnetic resonance imaging) is necessary could save money, mainly by identifying localized cancer earlier and reducing the need for expensive treatments for advanced cancer.

Stockholm3 in a Multiethnic Cohort for Prostate Cancer Detection (SEPTA): A Prospective Multicentered Trial

PURPOSE

Asian, Black, and Hispanic men are underrepresented in prostate cancer (PCa) clinical trials. Few novel prostate cancer biomarkers have been validated in diverse cohorts. We aimed to determine if Stockholm3 can improve prostate cancer detection in a diverse cohort.

METHODS

An observational prospective multicentered (17 sites) clinical trial (2019-2023), supplemented by prospectively recruited participants (2008-2020) in a urology clinic setting included men with suspicion of PCa and underwent prostate biopsy. Before biopsy, sample was collected for measurement of the Stockholm3 risk score. Parameters include prostate-specific antigen (PSA), free PSA, KLK2, GDF15, PSP94, germline risk (single-nucleotide polymorphisms), age, family history, and previous negative biopsy. The primary endpoint was detection of International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Grade ≥2 cancer (clinically significant PCa, csPC). The two primary aims were to (1) demonstrate noninferior sensitivity (0.8 lower bound 95% CI noninferiority margin) in detecting csPC using Stockholm3 compared with PSA (relative sensitivity) and (2) demonstrate superior specificity by reducing biopsies with benign results or low-grade cancers (relative specificity).

RESULTS

A total of 2,129 biopsied participants were included: Asian (16%, 350), Black or African American (Black; 24%, 505), Hispanic or Latino and White (Hispanic; 14%, 305), and non-Hispanic or non-Latino and White (White; 46%, 969). Overall, Stockholm3 showed noninferior sensitivity compared with PSA ≥4 ng/mL (relative sensitivity: 0.95 [95% CI, 0.92 to 0.99]) and nearly three times higher specificity (relative specificity: 2.91 [95% CI, 2.63 to 3.22]). Results were consistent across racial and ethnic subgroups: noninferior sensitivity (0.91-0.98) and superior specificity (2.51-4.70). Compared with PSA, Stockholm3 could reduce benign and ISUP 1 biopsies by 45% overall and between 42% and 52% across racial and ethnic subgroups.

CONCLUSION

In a substantially diverse population, Stockholm3 significantly reduces unnecessary prostate biopsies while maintaining a similar sensitivity to PSA in detecting csPC.

Prostate Biopsies Can Be Omitted in Most Patients with a Positive Stockholm3 Test and Negative Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging

BACKGROUND

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) combined with the Stockholm3 test can be used to inform biopsy decision-making in patients with a suspicion of prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the consequence of omitting biopsies in men with a positive Stockholm3 test and a negative MRI.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

In a real-life setting, 438 men with a positive Stockholm3 test and a negative MRI underwent systematic biopsies from 2017 to 2020.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

The Stockholm3 test result is a percentage risk score with or without a prostate volume cutoff. The main outcomes were the number of clinically significant (Gleason grade group [GG] ≥2) and nonsignificant (GG 1) prostate cancers.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Median prostate-specific antigen was 4.5 ng/ml (interquartile range 2.8-6.4 ng/ml) and the median age was 69 yr. Systematic biopsies detected grade group (GG) ≥2 disease in 48 men (11%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 8.4-14.2%) and GG 1 disease in 94 men (21.5%, 95% CI 17.9-25.6%). Of 256 patients without a volume cutoff in the test report, GG ≥2 was detected in 37 men (14.5%, 95% CI 10.7-19.3%). Omitting biopsies in patients with a volume cutoff would miss 11 GG ≥2 cases (6%, 95% CI 3.4-10.5%), reduce the number of GG 1 cases detected by 37 (39.4%, 95% CI 30.1-49.5%), and avoid a total of 182 biopsies (41.6%, 95% CI 37.0-46.2%). Limitations include the lack of follow-up data.

CONCLUSIONS

Systematic biopsies can be omitted in patients with a positive Stockholm3 test and a negative MRI when there is a volume cutoff in the test report. With no volume cutoff, biopsies can be considered with shared decision-making.

PATIENT SUMMARY

When investigated on suspicion of prostate cancer with a positive Stockholm3 test and a negative MRI (magnetic resonance imaging), prostate biopsies are only necessary for a subgroup of patients. This can spare some men from undergoing biopsies and reduce the detection of clinically insignificant cancers.

Biomarker vs MRI-Enhanced Strategies for Prostate Cancer Screening: The STHLM3-MRI Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Prostate cancer guidelines often recommend obtaining magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before a biopsy, yet MRI access is limited. To date, no randomized clinical trial has compared the use of novel biomarkers for risk estimation vs MRI-based diagnostic approaches for prostate cancer screening.

Objective

To evaluate biomarker-based risk estimation (Stockholm3 risk scores or prostate-specific antigen [PSA] levels) with systematic biopsies vs an MRI-enhanced strategy (PSA levels and MRI with systematic and targeted biopsy) for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer in a screening setting.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This open-label randomized clinical trial conducted in Stockholm, Sweden, between April 4, 2018, and December 10, 2020, recruited men aged 50 to 74 years with no history of prostate cancer. Participants underwent blood sampling for PSA and Stockholm3 tests to estimate their risk of clinically significant prostate cancer (Gleason score ≥3 + 4). After the blood tests were performed, participants were randomly assigned in a 2:3 ratio to receive a Stockholm3 test with systematic biopsy (biomarker group) or a PSA test followed by MRI with systematic and targeted biopsy (MRI-enhanced group). Data were analyzed from September 1 to November 5, 2023.

Interventions

In the biomarker group, men with a Stockholm3 risk score of 0.15 or higher underwent systematic biopsies. In the MRI-enhanced group, men with a PSA level of 3 ng/mL or higher had an MRI and those with a Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score of 3 or higher (range: 1-5, with higher scores indicating a higher likelihood of clinically significant prostate cancer) underwent targeted and systematic biopsies.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Primary outcome was detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (Gleason score ≥3 + 4). Secondary outcomes included detection of clinically insignificant cancer (Gleason score ≤6) and the number of biopsy procedures performed.

Results

Of 12 743 male participants (median [IQR] age, 61 [55-67] years), 5134 were assigned to the biomarker group and 7609 to the MRI-enhanced group. In the biomarker group, 8.0% of men (413) had Stockholm3 risk scores of 0.15 or higher and were referred for systematic biopsies. In the MRI-enhanced group, 12.2% of men (929) had a PSA level of 3 ng/mL or higher and were referred for MRI with biopsies if they had a PI-RADS score of 3 or higher. Detection rates of clinically significant prostate cancer were comparable between the 2 groups: 2.3% in the biomarker group and 2.5% in the MRI-enhanced group (relative proportion, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.73-1.15). More biopsies were performed in the biomarker group than in the MRI-enhanced group (326 of 5134 [6.3%] vs 338 of 7609 [4.4%]; relative proportion, 1.43 [95% CI, 1.23-1.66]), and more indolent prostate cancers were detected (61 [1.2%] vs 41 [0.5%]; relative proportion, 2.21 [95% CI, 1.49-3.27]).

Conclusions and Relevance

Findings of this randomized clinical trial indicate that combining a Stockholm3 test with systematic biopsies is comparable with MRI-based screening with PSA levels and systematic and targeted biopsies for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer, but this approach resulted in more biopsies as well as detection of a greater number of indolent cancers. In regions where access to MRI is lacking, the Stockholm3 test can aid in selecting patients for systematic prostate biopsy.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03377881.

The Capio Prostate Cancer Center Model for Prostate Cancer Diagnostics-Real-world Evidence from 2018 to 2022

Background

The Capio Prostate Cancer Center (Capio PCC) in Stockholm, Sweden, adopts a comprehensive diagnostic approach, utilizing prostate-specific antigen (PSA), Stockholm3, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for prostate cancer risk assessment, followed by targeted and systematic biopsies for high-risk cases.

Objective

This study aims to elucidate the clinical process and real-world outcomes of the Capio PCC model for prostate cancer diagnosis at Capio S:t Göran Hospital.

Design setting and participants

Between 2018 and 2022, a cohort of 12 406 men aged 45-75 yr underwent prostate cancer testing, adhering to Capio PCC's structured diagnostic protocol.

Outcome measurements and statistical analysis

We provide a comprehensive description of the Capio PCC model and present results from its implementation, including assessments of PSA, Stockholm3, MRI scans, and biopsies. A comparative analysis is conducted between the diagnostic outcomes obtained at Capio PCC and those obtained at other regions in Sweden.

Results and limitations

The median participant age was 61 yr (interquartile range [IQR]: 55-67), with PSA levels at 1.6 ng/ml (IQR: 0.8-3.3) and Stockholm3 scores at 4 (IQR: 3-11). Among 1064 men (8.6%) undergoing biopsies, 611 (57% of biopsied) were diagnosed with International Society of Urological Pathology grade ≥ 2 cancer. Notably, employing a Stockholm3 ≥ 15 cutoff for biopsy, in lieu of PSA ≥ 3 ng/ml, reduced biopsy recommendations by 43%. For men with PSA levels between 1.5 and 2.9 ng/ml, 360 (12%) exhibited Stockholm3 scores of ≥ 15, with 72 (56% of biopsied) diagnosed with clinically significant prostate cancer. A comparative analysis with national Swedish prostate cancer detection data indicated that the Capio PCC model (vs Sweden) revealed a distribution of 14% (vs 25%) low-risk, 59% (vs 42%) intermediate-risk, and 26% (vs 30%) high-risk and advanced cancers.

Conclusions

This study underscores the effectiveness of the protocol-driven diagnostic process at Capio PCC, enabling earlier detection of intermediate-risk prostate cancer and reducing the need for MRI assessments compared with standard prostate cancer care in Sweden.

Patient summary

At the Capio Prostate Cancer Center, a novel diagnostic approach incorporating prostate-specific antigen, Stockholm3, magnetic resonance imaging, and targeted biopsies has been implemented to enhance prostate cancer testing and diagnosis in Stockholm, Sweden.

Increased magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer management-What are the outcomes?

RATIONALE

Increased attention to cancer care has instigated altered systems for screening, diagnosis, and management of various types of cancer, such as in the prostate. While such systems very likely have improved the quality of cancer care, they also result in the altered use of specific services, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

AIMS AND OBJECTIVE

To study the change in the use of prostate MRI in the Norwegian health care system from 2013 to 2021 and to investigate some reasons for and potential implications of this change.

METHOD

Data from the Norwegian Health Economics Administration (HELFO), The Cancer Registry of Norway and Cause-of-death registry at the Norwegian Institute of public health and the health registry of Vestfold Hospital Trust were used for descriptive statistical analysis.

RESULTS

The number of MRIs of the prostate increased threefold from 2013 to 2021, representing an extra cost of 2 million USD in 2020. The incidence of prostate cancer was stable at about 5000 cases per year, corresponding to 178 per 100,000 men, indicating no increased overdiagnosis. However, the clinical staging has changed substantially during this period, indicating stage and grade migration. The number of negative biopsies was reduced, and there are three MRIs per reduced negative biopsy. The number of persons on active surveillance increased during the period. However, these changes are partly independent of the increase in the number of MRIs.

CONCLUSION

There was a substantial increase in the number of prostate MRIs and thus an increase in costs. This appears to have contributed to the reduction of negative biopsies, improved staging and increased active surveillance. However, as these effects are partly independent of the increase in MRIs, we need to document the outcomes for patients from prostate MRIs as their opportunity costs are substantial.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Stockholm 3 Testing Compared to PSA as the Primary Blood Test in the Prostate Cancer Diagnostic Pathway: A Decision Tree Approach

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated the cost effectiveness of using Stockholm 3 (STHLM3) testing compared to the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test in the diagnostic pathway for prostate cancer.

METHODS

We created a decision tree model for PSA (current standard) and STHLM3 (new alternative). Cost effectiveness was evaluated in a hypothetical cohort of male individuals aged 50-69 years. The study applied a Danish hospital perspective with a time frame restricted to the prostate cancer diagnostic pathway, beginning with the initial PSA/STHLM3 test, and ending with biopsy and histopathological diagnosis. Estimated values from the decision-analytical model were used to calculate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to test the robustness of the base-case analysis.

RESULTS

The model-based analysis revealed that STHLM3 testing was more effective than the PSA, but also more costly, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of €511.7 (95% credible interval, 359.9-674.3) for each additional correctly classified individual. In the deterministic sensitivity analysis, variations in the cost of STHLM3 had the greatest influence on the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. In the probabilistic sensitivity analysis, all iterations were positioned in the north-east quadrant of the incremental cost-effectiveness scatterplot. At a willingness to pay of €700 for an additional correctly classified individual, STHLM3 had a 100% probability of being cost effective.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to the PSA test as the initial testing modality in the prostate cancer diagnostic workup, STHLM3 testing showed improved incremental effectiveness, however, at additional costs. The results were sensitive to the cost of the STHLM3 test; therefore, a lower cost of the STHLM3 test would improve its cost effectiveness compared with PSA tests.

Men's perception of information and psychological distress in the diagnostic phase of prostate cancer: a comparative mixed methods study

BACKGROUND

Previous studies indicate that men experience frustration and uncertainty when confronted with an elevated prostate specific antigen (PSA) test and during further diagnostics for prostate cancer. The novel Stockholm3 test is an algorithm-based test that combines plasma protein biomarkers, genetic markers and clinical variables in predicting the risk of PCa. The test was introduced in a western part of Norway as a new tool for detecting prostate cancer. This study aimed to explore and compare men's perception of information and possible experience of distress between a PSA group and a Stockholm3 group during the diagnostic phase of prostate cancer.

METHODS

This study is a part of the trailing research evaluating the impact of the change from PSA to Stockholm3. It is a multicenter study using a comparative mixed method design. Data were collected in a PSA group (n = 130) and a Stockholm3 group (n = 120) between 2017 and 2019. Quantitative data were collected using questionnaires and qualitative data were collected using semi-structured interviews (n = 20). The quantitative and qualitative data were analysed and compared separately and then merged in a side-by-side discussion. The study adheres to the GRAMMS guidelines for reporting mixed-methods research.

RESULTS

Compared with the PSA group, men in the Stockholm3 group reported that the information from the general practitioners was better. Similarly, men in the Stockholm3 group were more likely to indicate that they had received sufficient information regarding how examinations would be conducted. No differences were found between the groups regarding waiting time and distress. Three themes emerged from the qualitative analysis of the two groups: "Information affects the experience of comprehension", "Stepping into the world of the healthcare system", and "Periodically feelings of distress".

CONCLUSION

The Stockholm3 test may facilitate the provision of information to patients. However, some patients in both groups experienced distress and would benefit from more information and additional support from healthcare professionals. Routines that ensure sufficient information from the interdisciplinary healthcare team should be of priority during the diagnostic phase of prostate cancer in order to provide patients with predictability and to avoid unnecessary distress.

Ethical Principles in the Analysis of Prostate Cancer Diagnostics

Recent developments in prostate cancer diagnostics call for appropriate tools to frame the ethical assessment of diagnostic practice. The first aim is to identify ethically important features and ethical principles of key importance for prostate cancer diagnostics. Next, we need to argue which ethical theory justifies these principles and can therefore be used for ethical assessment in the field. The standard medical procedure for prostate cancer diagnostics offered by the Danish health care system is used as an example.

General practitioners' reflections on using PSA for diagnosis of prostate cancer. A qualitative study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate how GPs use the PSA test as a diagnostic tool in daily practice.

DESIGN

Qualitative study using focus group interviews, the transcripts being analyzed by systemic text condensation.

SUBJECTS

A total of 17 Norwegian GPs in three CME groups.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Exploring GPs' attitudes to national guidelines and the practical use of the PSA test.

RESULTS

Detecting prostate cancer in general practice is a common and important, but difficult diagnostic issue. Our participants experienced uncertainty regarding the test when to use it, how to interpret the results and when to refer to specialist health services.

CONCLUSION

The study revealed a general ambivalence to the use of PSA. Many patients present urological problems, and many are afraid of having cancer. PSA is commonly used, but sometimes generates problems rather than solving them.

IMPLICATIONS

The use of the PSA test should be based on a thorough clinical assessment and in close collaboration with the patient.Key pointsMany patients in general practice present urological problems, and many are afraid of having cancer.GPs have a general ambivalence to the use of PSA when to use it, how to interpret the results and when to refer to specialist health services.The use of PSA sometimes generates problems rather than solving them.

Equitable access to cancer patient pathways in Norway - a national registry-based study

Background

In 2015, cancer patient pathways (CPP) were implemented in Norway to reduce unnecessary non-medical delay in the diagnostic process and start of treatment. The main aim of this study was to investigate the equality in access to CPPs for patients with either lung, colorectal, breast or prostate cancer in Norway.

Methods

National population-based data on individual level from 2015 to 2017 were used to study two proportions; i) patients in CPPs without the cancer diagnosis, and ii) cancer patients included in CPPs. Logistic regression was applied to examine the associations between these proportions and place of residence (hospital referral area), age, education, income, comorbidity and travel time to hospital.

Results

Age and place of residence were the two most important factors for describing the variation in proportions. For the CPP patients, inconsistent differences were found for income and education, while for the cancer patients the probability of being included in a CPP increased with income.

Conclusions

The age effect can be related to both the increasing risk of cancer and increasing number of GP and hospital contacts with age. The non-systematic results for CPP patients according to income and education can be interpreted as equitable access, as opposed to the systematic differences found among cancer patients in different income groups. The inequalities between income groups among cancer patients and the inequalities based on the patients’ place of residence, for both CPP and cancer patients, are unwarranted and need to be addressed.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at (10.1186/s12913-021-07250-1).

Alterations in protein expression and site-specific N-glycosylation of prostate cancer tissues

Identifying molecular alterations occurring during cancer progression is essential for a deeper understanding of the underlying biological processes. Here we have analyzed cancerous and healthy prostate biopsies using nanoLC-MS(MS) to detect proteins with altered expression and N-glycosylation. We have identified 75 proteins with significantly changing expression during disease progression. The biological processes involved were assigned based on protein-protein interaction networks. These include cellular component organization, metabolic and localization processes. Multiple glycoproteins were identified with aberrant glycosylation in prostate cancer, where differences in glycosite-specific sialylation, fucosylation, and galactosylation were the most substantial. Many of the glycoproteins with altered N-glycosylation were extracellular matrix constituents, and are heavily involved in the establishment of the tumor microenvironment.

Tissue- and Liquid-Based Biomarkers in Prostate Cancer Precision Medicine

Worldwide, prostate cancer (PC) is the second-most-frequently diagnosed male cancer and the fifth-most-common cause of all cancer-related deaths. Suspicion of PC in a patient is largely based upon clinical signs and the use of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels. Although PSA levels have been criticised for a lack of specificity, leading to PC over-diagnosis, it is still the most commonly used biomarker in PC management. Unfortunately, PC is extremely heterogeneous, and it can be difficult to stratify patients whose tumours are unlikely to progress from those that are aggressive and require treatment intensification. Although PC-specific biomarker research has previously focused on disease diagnosis, there is an unmet clinical need for novel prognostic, predictive and treatment response biomarkers that can be used to provide a precision medicine approach to PC management. In particular, the identification of biomarkers at the time of screening/diagnosis that can provide an indication of disease aggressiveness is perhaps the greatest current unmet clinical need in PC management. Largely through advances in genomic and proteomic techniques, exciting pre-clinical and clinical research is continuing to identify potential tissue, blood and urine-based PC-specific biomarkers that may in the future supplement or replace current standard practices. In this review, we describe how PC-specific biomarker research is progressing, including the evolution of PSA-based tests and those novel assays that have gained clinical approval. We also describe alternative diagnostic biomarkers to PSA, in addition to biomarkers that can predict PC aggressiveness and biomarkers that can predict response to certain therapies. We believe that novel biomarker research has the potential to make significant improvements to the clinical management of this disease in the near future.

Prostate Cancer Liquid Biopsy Biomarkers' Clinical Utility in Diagnosis and Prognosis

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common cancer in men worldwide. The current gold standard for diagnosing PCa relies on a transrectal ultrasound-guided systematic core needle biopsy indicated after detection changes in a digital rectal examination (DRE) and elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level in the blood serum. PSA is a marker produced by prostate cells, not just cancer cells. Therefore, an elevated PSA level may be associated with other symptoms such as benign prostatic hyperplasia or inflammation of the prostate gland. Due to this marker's low specificity, a common problem is overdiagnosis, which leads to unnecessary biopsies and overtreatment. This is associated with various treatment complications (such as bleeding or infection) and generates unnecessary costs. Therefore, there is no doubt that the improvement of the current procedure by applying effective, sensitive and specific markers is an urgent need. Several non-invasive, cost-effective, high-accuracy liquid biopsy diagnostic biomarkers such as Progensa PCA3, MyProstateScore ExoDx, SelectMDx, PHI, 4K, Stockholm3 and ConfirmMDx have been developed in recent years. This article compares current knowledge about them and their potential application in clinical practice.

Risk stratification in men with a negative prostate biopsy: an interim analysis of a prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether a risk score for prostate cancer (PCa) lifetime risk can be used to optimise triaging of patients with a negative prostate biopsy, but under sustained suspicion of PCa.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this prospective clinical study, we included, and risk scored patients who had a PCa-negative transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy, but elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA), a suspicious prostate digital rectal examination and/or a positive family history (FH) of PCa. The risk score estimated individual lifetime risk of PCa, based on a polygenic risk score (33 single nucleotide polymorphisms), age, and FH of PCa. Patients were followed, under urological supervision, for up to 4 years with annual controls, always including PSA measurements. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and/or prostate biopsy was performed at selected annual controls depending on risk score and at the urologist's/patient's discretion, which means that the follow-up differed based on the risk score.

RESULTS

We included 429 patients. After risk scoring, 376/429 (88%) patients were allocated to a normal-risk group (<30% PCa lifetime risk) and 53/429 (12%) to a high-risk group (≥30% PCa lifetime risk). The high-risk group had significantly different follow-up, with more biopsy and mpMRI sessions compared to the normal-risk group. PCa was detected in 89/429 (21%) patients, with 67/376 (18%) patients diagnosed in the normal-risk group and 22/53 (42%) in the high-risk group. There was no statistically significant difference in the cumulative incidence of PCa between the normal-risk group and the high-risk group after 4 years of follow-up. Currently, 67/429 (16%) patients are still being followed in this ongoing study.

CONCLUSION

In a 4-year perspective, our PCa lifetime risk score did not demonstrate significant prognostic value for triaging patients, with a negative TRUS-guided biopsy and sustained suspicion of PCa.

The Genetic Complexity of Prostate Cancer

Prostate cancer (PCa) is a major concern in public health, with many genetically distinct subsets. Genomic alterations in PCa are extraordinarily complex, and both germline and somatic mutations are of great importance in the development of this tumor. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of genetic changes that can occur in the development of PCa and their role in potential therapeutic approaches. Various pathways and mechanisms proposed to play major roles in PCa are described in detail to provide an overview of current knowledge.