Management of persistent or locally recurrent epidermoid cancer of the anal canal with abdominoperineal resection

Simple imaging biomarker predicts survival in anal squamous cell cancer treated with curative intent: a UK cohort study

AIM

This study aimed to determine the prognostic significance of length of tumour (mrT stage) and depth of extramural spread (mrEMS) in anal squamous cell cancer (SCC) treated by chemoradiation with curative intent. Locally advanced anal SCC (T3-4 N+) have poorer prognosis, but it is unknown whether the lateral spread of the tumour (extramural spread beyond the bowel wall) also confers poor prognosis in anal SCC, as it does for rectal cancer. T stage and mrEMS can be readily assessed by pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) routinely undertaken to stage anal SCC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

125 patients were included. Baseline mrT, mrN and mrEMS were assessed with response to chemoradiation and outcomes. Receiver operating curve (ROC) curve was used to determine a binary cut-off for mrEMS according to 3-year progression- free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

43% were mrT3-4 and 38% were mrEMSpoor at baseline. 87% achieved mrCR. 3-year PFS and overall survival (OS) were 70.6% and 82%. On univariate analysis worse 3-year PFS was seen for mrT3-4 (HR 3.105), mrEMSpoor (HR 4.924) and failure to achieve mrCR (HR 20.591). By univariate analysis, worse 3-year OS was seen for mrT3-4 (HR 4.134), mrEMSpoor (HR 10.251) and failure to achieve mrCR (HR 19.289). On multivariate analysis, only mrEMSpoor and failure to achieve mrCR remained prognostic. mrN was not prognostic.

CONCLUSION

MrEMSpoor is a simple prognostic imaging biomarker for poorer survival which can be readily assessed by radiologists on routine imaging. mrEMS should be considered as a future stratification variable to identify high-risk SCC and consider escalation of treatment and surveillance strategies.

Oncologic Outcomes of Salvage Abdominoperineal Resection for Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Initially Managed with Chemoradiation

Background: Abdominoperineal resection (APR) has been advocated for persistent or recurrent disease after failure of chemoradiation (CRT) for anal squamous cell cancer (SCC). Treatment with salvage APR can potentially achieve a cure. This study aimed to analyze oncological outcomes for salvage APR in a recent time period at a comprehensive cancer center. Methods: A retrospective review of all patients who underwent APR for biopsy-proven persistent or recurrent anal SCC between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2020 was performed. Patients with stage IV disease at the time of initial diagnosis and patients with missing data were excluded. Univariate analysis was used with a chi-square test for categorical variables, and non-parametric tests were used for continuous variables. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to evaluate disease-specific (DSS), post-APR local recurrence-free (RFS), and disease-free survival (DFS). Results: A total of 96 patients were included in the analysis: 39 (41%) with persistent disease and 57 (59%) with recurrent SCC after chemoradiation had been completed. The median follow-up was 22 months (IQR 11-47). Forty-nine patients (51%) underwent extended APR and/or pelvic exenteration. Eight (8%) patients developed local recurrence, 30 (31%) developed local and distant recurrences, and 16 (17%) developed distant recurrences alone. The 3-year DSS, post-APR local recurrence-free survival, and disease-free survival were 53.8% (95% CI 43.5-66.5%), 54.5% (95% CI 44.4-66.8%), and 26.8% (95% CI 18.6-38.7%), respectively. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, positive microscopic margin (OR 10.0, 95% CI 2.16-46.12, p = 0.003), positive nodes in the surgical specimen (OR 9.19, 95% CI 1.99-42.52, p = 0.005), and lymphovascular invasion (OR 2.61 95% CI 1.05-6.51, p = 0.04) were associated with recurrence of disease. Gender, indication for APR (recurrent vs. persistent disease), HIV status, extent of surgery, or type of reconstruction did not influence survival outcomes. Twenty patients had targeted tumor-sequencing data available. Nine patients had PIK3CA mutations, seven of whom experienced a recurrence. Conclusions: Salvage APR for anal SCC after failed CRT was associated with poor disease-specific survival and low recurrence-free survival. Anal SCC patients undergoing salvage APR should be counseled that microscopic positive margins, positive lymph nodes, or the presence of lymphovascular invasion in the APR specimen are prognosticators for disease relapse. Our results accentuate the necessity for additional treatment strategies for the ongoing treatment challenge of persistent or recurrent anal SCC after failed CRT.

Salvage Abdominoperineal Resection for Squamous Cell Anal Cancer: A 30-Year Single-Institution Experience

Background

Failure of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for anal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) results in persistent or recurrent anal SCC. Treatment with salvage abdominoperineal resection (APR) can potentially achieve cure. The aims of this study are to analyze oncological and surgical outcomes of our 30-year experience with salvage APR for anal SCC after failed CRT and identify prognostic factors for overall survival (OS).

Methods

All consecutive patients who underwent salvage APR between 1990 and 2016 for histologically confirmed persistent or recurrent anal SCC after failed CRT were retrospectively analyzed.

Results

Forty-seven patients underwent salvage APR for either persistent (n = 24) or recurrent SCC (n = 23). Median OS was 47 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 10.0–84.0 months] and 5-year survival was 41.6%, which did not differ significantly between persistent or recurrent disease (p = 0.551). Increased pathological tumor size (p < 0.001) and lymph node involvement (p = 0.014) were associated with impaired hazard for OS on multivariable analysis, and irradical resection only (p = 0.001) on univariable analysis. Twenty-one patients developed local recurrence after salvage APR, of whom 8 underwent repeat salvage surgery and 13 received palliative treatment. Median OS was 9 months (95% CI 7.2–10.8 months) after repeat salvage surgery and 4 months (95% CI 2.8–5.1 months) following palliative treatment (p = 0.055).

Conclusions

Salvage APR for anal SCC after failed CRT resulted in adequate survival, with 5-year survival of 41.6%. Negative prognostic factors for survival were increased tumor size, lymph node involvement, and irradical resection. Patients with recurrent anal SCC after salvage APR had poor prognosis, irrespective of performance of repeat salvage surgery, which never resulted in cure.

MITHRA - multiparametric MR/CT image adapted brachytherapy (MR/CT-IABT) in anal canal cancer: a feasibility study

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to test a novel multiparametric imaging guided procedure for high-dose-rate brachytherapy in anal canal cancer, in order to evaluate the feasibility and safety.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

For this analysis, we considered all consecutive patients who underwent magnetic resonance/computed tomography image adapted brachytherapy (MR/CT-IABT) treated from February 2012 to July 2014. To conduct this project, we formed a working group that established the procedure and identified the indicators and benchmarks to evaluate the feasibility and safety. We considered the procedure acceptable if 90% of the indicators were consistent with the benchmarks. Magnetic resonance imaging with contrast and diffusion weighted imaging were performed with an MRI-compatible dummy applicator in the anus to define the position of the clinical target volume disease and biological information. A pre-implantation treatment planning was created in order to get information on the optimal position of the needles. Afterwards, the patient underwent a simulation CT and the definite post-implantation treatment planning was created.

RESULTS

We treated 11 patients (4 men and 7 women) with MR/CT-IABT and we performed a total of 13 procedures. The analysis of indicators for procedure evaluation showed that all indicators were in agreement with the benchmark. The dosimetric analysis resulted in a median of V200, V150, V100, V90, V85, respectively of 24.6%, 53.4%, 93.5%, 97.6%, and 98.7%. The median coverage index (CI) was 0.94, the median dose homogeneity index (DHI) was 0.43, the median dose non-uniformity ratio (DNR) resulted 0.56, the median overdose volume index (ODI) was 0.27. We observed no episodes of common severe acute toxicities.

CONCLUSIONS

Brachytherapy is a possible option in anal cancer radiotherapy to perform the boost to complete external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). Magnetic resonance can also have biological advantages compared to the US. Our results suggest that the multiparametric MR/CT-IABT for anal cancer is feasible and safe. This new approach paves the way to prospective comparison studies between MRI and ultrasound-guided brachytherapy (USBT) in anal canal cancer.

Salvage abdominoperineal resection for anal cancer following chemoradiation: a proposed scoring system for predicting postoperative survival

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Anal carcinoma is treated primarily by chemoradiation. Failure of this treatment requires salvage surgery. The aims of this retrospective study were to assess the survival probability after rescue surgery and design a pathological risk score (PRS) to predict postoperative outcome.

METHODS

From 1982 to 2011, the clinical and pathological data of 111 patients treated with chemoradiation or radiation alone and abdominoperineal resection were reviewed. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to assess overall survival and parametric modeling was applied to determine prognostic factors and design a PRS.

RESULTS

The 2- and 5-year overall survival rates were 60% and 24.5%, respectively. The multivariate analysis showed that nodal disease (P < 0.03), resection margin (P < 0.001), and perineural and/or lymphovascular invasion (P < 0.0001) were significantly associated with survival. Patients who presented negative values for these three variables were estimated to show a 5-year survival rate of 55% compared with 0.03% for patients who presented positive values.

CONCLUSIONS

Positive surgical margin, the presence of perineural and/or lymphovascular invasion and positive nodal involvement were identified as significant independent predictors of mortality. The PRS was shown to be highly predictive of postoperative outcome.

Squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal: a review of the aetiology, presentation, staging, prognosis and methods available for treatment

Anal cancer is an uncommon malignancy, with the majority of cases comprised of squamous cell carcinomas. The increasing incidence of this disease reflects a rise in the transmission of the human papillomavirus, the causative organism of most tumours. Abdominoperineal resection (APR), once the primary mode of treatment, has been supplanted by sphincter-saving combination chemoradiation as the first-line therapy. However, surgeons continue to play a role in the multidisciplinary management of patients with anal cancer for diagnosis and post-treatment surveillance. Sentinel node biopsy may identify patients with clinically and radiographically negative inguinal lymph nodes who will benefit from groin irradiation. In very select cases, the controversial means of local excision has been employed as primary treatment, often in conjunction with radiation and chemotherapy. The management of persistent or recurrent anal cancers following primary chemoradiation remains a concern, for which only salvage APR currently offers the possibility of a cure. The introduction of human papillomavirus vaccines presents the exciting potential for the eradication of the disease.

Is Survival Reduced for Patients with Anal Cancer Requiring Surgery after Failure of Radiation? Analysis from a Population Study over Two Decades

Chemoradiotherapy is the standard treatment for anal cancer. Surgery is reserved for failure of therapy, but there are limited data examining outcomes after surgery. From a prospective population-based database on radiation and surgical therapy, we compare outcomes for patients with anal cancer undergoing rectal resection after radiation with patients undergoing radiation alone. Patients undergoing surgical resection of the rectum after initial radiation (SRT) for squamous cell carcinoma of the anus, anal canal, cloacogenic zone, and overlapping lesions of the rectum and anal canal from 1983 to 2002 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database. Patient and tumor characteristics of SRT were compared with those of patients who underwent radiation alone (RT). Survival was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier test. There were 1202 patients undergoing RT and 48 patients undergoing SRT. RT and SRT had similar median age, gender, and grade of tumor. SRT had more patients with regional stage of disease (66.7 vs 42.4%, P = 0.001). Mean survival for SRT was, however, similar to RT (103 vs 96 months, P = 0.8). For patients with localized stage, survival for SRT and RT was similar (105 vs 98 months, P = 0.7). For patients with regional stage, survival for SRT and RT was similar (95 vs 83 months, P = 0.6). The presence of regional disease appears to be associated with surgical resection after radiotherapy. Mean survival for such patients is comparable to that of patients undergoing radiation alone. Because radiation is combined with chemotherapy, this suggests that salvage surgery after failure of therapy results in outcomes comparable to combination therapy alone.

Perineal healing and survival after anal cancer salvage surgery: 10-year experience with primary perineal reconstruction using the vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous (VRAM) flap

Salvage surgery of recurrent or persistent anal cancer following radiotherapy is often followed by perineal wound complications. We examined survival and perineal wound complications in anal cancer salvage surgery during a 10-year period with primary perineal reconstruction predominantly performed using vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous (VRAM) flap. Between 1997 and 2006, 49 patients underwent anal cancer salvage surgery. Of these, 48 had primary reconstruction with VRAM. Overall survival was computed by the Kaplan-Meier method and mortality rate ratios (MRRs) by Cox regression. One patient (2%) died within 30 days postoperatively. Postoperative complications necessitated reoperation in eight (16%) patients. We found no major perineal wound infections. Major perineal wound breakdown occurred in the only patient in whom VRAM was not used. Five-year survival was 61% [95% confidence interval (CI) 43-75%]. Free resection margins (R0) were obtained in 78% of patients, with 5-year survival of 75% (95% CI 53-87%). Involved margins, microscopically only (R1) or macroscopically (R2), strongly predicted an adverse outcome [age-adjusted 2-year MRRs (95% CI) R1 vs. R0 = 4.1 (0.7-23.6), R2 vs. R0 = 10.9 (2.2-54.2)]. We conclude that anal cancer salvage surgery can yield long-time survival but obtaining free margins is critical. A low rate of perineal complications is achievable by primary perineal reconstruction using VRAM flap.

Abdominoperineal resection for anal cancer

PURPOSE

Following initial radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for the treatment of anal cancer, patients who present with either persistent or locally recurrent disease are treated by abdominoperineal resection. The aim of this retrospective study was to review the long-term survival and prognostic factors after such surgery in a single institution.

METHODS

Over a 34-year period (1969-2003), 422 patients with nonmetastatic anal cancer were treated with a curative intent. Of these, 83 (median age 61 years; 74 women) underwent abdominoperineal resection.

RESULTS

Forty-one patients underwent abdominoperineal resection for persistent disease and 42 for locally recurrent disease. Postoperative mortality was 4.8 percent and morbidity was 35 percent with 18 percent having perineal wound infections. Median follow-up was 104 months (range, 3-299). The 3-year and 5-year actuarial survival was 62.8 and 56.5 percent respectively. Using univariate analysis, patients below 55 years, females, T1-2 tumors, N0-N1 lymphadenopathy and the absence of locally advanced tumor were associated with significantly improved survival. Surgery, whether for persistent or locally recurrent disease, did not affect the 5-year survival rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Abdominoperineal resection for nonmetastatic anal cancer is associated with a high morbidity rate but may result in long-term survival regardless of the indication.

Outcomes of salvage surgery for squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal

BACKGROUND

For patients with anal canal cancer who fail combined modality treatment (CMT), salvage surgery (SS) offers the potential for long term survival. The literature regarding SS is limited by small patient numbers and/or heterogeneous treatment protocols. We report on a large series of patients initially treated with chemoradiation at a major referral center.

METHODS

We identified 60 patients with persistent or recurrent anal cancer who had undergone SS; 20 were excluded. Overall and disease-free survival (OS, DFS) curves were constructed using the Kaplan Meier method. Univariate analysis was done using the Log-Rank test, and multivariable analysis using Cox proportional hazards.

RESULTS

The 40 patients (29 women, 11 men, median age 57) underwent curative intent resection. The initial procedure was multivisceral resection (n = 24), abdominoperineal resection alone (n = 14) or local excision (n = 2). Postoperative mortality was 5%. Postoperative complications were seen in 72%. Median follow-up was 18 months overall and 36 months in survivors. Median OS was 41 months; OS and disease free survival at 5 years were 39% and 30%, respectively. Recurrence was present in 21 patients at time of analysis. Failure was locoregional in 86% (18 of 21) and distant in 48% (10 of 21). Independent predictors of poor OS were male gender, Charlson Comorbidity Score and tumor size. Independent predictors of poor disease free survival were positive margins and lymphovascular invasion.

CONCLUSION

SS for anal canal cancer was associated with significant morbidity. Long-term survival was achieved in 39% of patients. Comorbidities should guide patient selection, and R0 resection should be the goal.

Justification for staging of epidermoid anal carcinoma after salvage surgery: a pathological guideline

The currently accepted first line treatment for epidermoid anal cancer is chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Tumour size and adjacent organ involvement are the key in the pretreatment assessment for T1-T4 tumours respectively. Residual or recurrent disease following initial CRT, is best treated by salvage anorectal excision. Pathological staging systems of resections were historically validated when surgery was the primary treatment and are therefore in need of revision. We propose a new pathological staging system for salvage anorectal excision specimens to allow improved prognostic guidelines postoperatively.

Results of surgical salvage after failed chemoradiation therapy for epidermoid carcinoma of the anal canal

BACKGROUND

The standard treatment for epidermoid carcinoma of the anal canal consists of combined radiation and chemotherapy. For patients who present with persistent or locally recurrent disease, salvage abdominoperineal resection is the treatment of choice. The purpose of this study is to review our experience with salvage surgery in this group of patients.

METHODS

From 1990-2002, 31 patients underwent radical salvage surgery with curative intent after failure of initial sphincter-conserving therapy, and the medical records of these patients were retrospectively reviewed. Clinicopathologic variables were determined and comparisons performed with the Cox proportional hazards model. Survival was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Eleven patients underwent radical salvage surgery for persistent disease and 20 patients for recurrent disease. The median follow-up time was 29 months. The actuarial 5-year overall survival was 64%. Twelve patients developed recurrent disease after radical salvage surgery. Patients who received an initial radiation dose of less than 55 Gy had a significantly worse survival than those who received at least 55 Gy as part of their initial treatment (5-year overall survival 37.5% vs. 75%; age-adjusted hazard ratio 8.2 [95% CI: 1.1-59.8], P = .037). The presence of positive lymph nodes at presentation also adversely affected survival (P < .05). Factors that were not found to have an impact on survival included the presence of persistent versus recurrent disease, tumor (T) stage, and margin status of resection.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term survival following salvage surgery for persistent or locally recurrent epidermoid carcinoma of the anal canal can be achieved in the majority of patients. However, patients who initially present with node-positive disease and patients who receive a radiation dose of less than 55 Gy as part of their initial chemoradiation therapy regimen have a worse prognosis after radical salvage surgery.

Brain metastases from epithelial ovarian cancer

Brain metastasis from epithelial ovarian cancer is uncommon. We studied the presentation, treatment, and prognosis of brain metastasis in a single institution. A retrospective review of clinical details kept in the computer database of gynecologic oncology services in a tertiary institution between 1993 and 2003 was done. A Medline search for English publications on brain metastasis from epithelial ovarian cancer was performed from 1966 to 2003. The study period included 605 patients, and 4 (0.66%) patients developed brain metastases. The patients were usually well, until they presented with hemiparesis. The median primary treatment to brain metastasis interval was 16.5 months. Three out of four cases had multiple brain metastases, and all had small-volume extracranial tumor relapses. Serum CA125 measurement was not reliable in the screening for brain metastasis. The median survival after brain metastasis was 19.5 months. Single brain metastasis can be treated with surgery. Our experience supports the prevalent published opinion that all other cases should be considered for combined radiotherapy and surgery or radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Surveillance of tumor recurrence with serum CA125 monitoring does not predict brain metastasis, which carries a poor prognosis. The best mode of management of these patients is yet to be determined. Large study with multicenter participation to establish the standard treatment is urgently needed.

Epidermoid anal cancer: a review of a population-based series of 308 consecutive patients treated according to prospective protocols

PURPOSE

The primary therapy in epidermoid anal cancer is radiotherapy, generally with chemotherapy. The use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been infrequently reported in the literature. This study presents results from a large population-based series and provides comparisons between different treatments.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 1985 and 2000, 308 patients with invasive epidermoid anal cancer were diagnosed in the Stockholm Health Care Region. Treatment was given according to defined protocols. External beam radiotherapy alone or with concomitant bleomycin and neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy alone were the primary treatments. Radical surgery was reserved for poor responders or recurrences. Data were reviewed with regard to treatment, outcome, and prognostic factors.

RESULTS

Among the 276 patients (90%) treated with curative intent, 264 (96%) received treatment in accordance with the protocols. The overall 5-year survival rate was 68%. Among the 142 patients with locally advanced tumors (T > or =4 cm or N+), patients treated with neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy (n = 91) had significantly better complete response rates compared with patients treated with radiotherapy with or without bleomycin (n = 51) (92% vs. 76%, p < 0.01). A significantly increased overall 5-year survival rate was also found among patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy (63% vs. 44%, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Structured treatment protocols result in favorable outcome on a population level. The results further suggest a significant therapeutic gain from including neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced anal cancer.

Refined staging by sentinel lymph node biopsy to individualize therapy in anal cancer

We evaluated the feasibility of the sentinel lymph node technique to refine staging and potentially individualize therapy for anal cancer. Seventeen patients with cancer of the anal canal underwent peritumoral injection of 99mTc-colloid, followed 17 hours later by lymphoscintigraphy. A selective lymph node biopsy (SLNB) was attempted in 12 of 13 cases with scintigraphically detected SLNs. Lymph node metastases were present in 5 of 12 cases (42%); in 2 of these 5 cases, micrometastases were detected only by immunohistochemical staining. Hence, SLNB refines the diagnostic workup for anal cancer and provides an accurate basis for individualized therapy.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy progress in surgical treatment of cancer

BACKGROUND

Forty-three years after the first description of the sentinel lymph node technique in malignant tumours of the parotid by Gould, sentinel lymph node biopsy (SNLB) has become a precious tool in the treatment of solid tumours.

METHODS

In the following review we give a synopsis of the fundamentals of the sentinel lymph node concept and then proceed to an overview of recent advances of SNLB in gastrointestinal cancers.

RESULTS

In some tumour entities, SNLB has been shown to reflect reliably the lymph node status of the tumour-draining lymph node basin. In melanoma and breast cancer, it became a widely accepted element of the routine surgical management of these malignant diseases. In gastrointestinal tumours, the technique is currently under intense investigation. First reports on its application in other solid tumours, such as non-small cell lung cancer, thyroid carcinoma, oropharyngeal carcinoma, vulvar carcinoma, and Merckel cell carcinoma of the skin, were published more recently.

CONCLUSION

SNLB has become an important component of diagnosis and treatment of solid tumours. A growing number of publications on SNLB in gastrointestinal cancer documents the interest of many investigators in the application of this technique in this tumour entity. As long as imaging techniques like 18FDG PET or other molecular imaging techniques are limited by their spatial resolution, SNLB remains the technique of choice for lympho-nodal staging.

Surgical considerations in anal cancer

SCC of the anus is rare; however, the surgeon is bound to encounter some of these patients during his or her career. It is important that the anatomic location and the histology be defined because the initial treatment may initially differ. Multimodality therapy is the treatment of choice in SCC of the anal canal, with surgery reserved for persistent or recurrent tumors. Multimodality therapy can be used selectively in SCC of the perianal skin, especially in large bulky tumors, followed by definitive surgery. Nevertheless, the initial treatment of perianal neoplasms is surgical therapy. In general, inguinal node metastases are treated with chemoradiation. In highly selected patients, groin dissections are performed, but this procedure is not routine.

Surgical salvage therapy of anal canal cancer

AIM: To evaluate the results of salvage resection in the management of persistent or locally recurrent anal canal cancer.

METHODS: Details of all patients with anal canal cancer treated from 1978 to 1994 at Cancer Hospital of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CAMS) were reviewed retrospectively. Sixteen patients who presented with persistent or locally recurrent anal canal cancer received salvage surgery. Before surgery all of the patients had received radiotherapy alone as their primary treatments.

RESULTS: Of the 16 patients, 14 received salvage abdominoperineal resection (APR) and two had transanal local excision. There were no deaths attributable to operation. Delayed healing of the perineal wound occurred in eight patients. Complications unrelated to the perineal wound were found in five patients. The median follow-up time was 120 (range 5 - 245) months after salvage surgery. Nine patients died of disease progression, with a median survival time of 16 (range 5 - 27) months. Six patients had a long-term survival.

CONCLUSION: Salvage resection after radiotherapy can yield a long-time survival in selected patients with anal canal cancer. However it offers little hope to patients with T₄ and/or N_2-3 tumors.

Anal neoplasms

A common theme in most anal neoplasms appears to be a delay in diagnosis due to confusion with more common, benign conditions. Thus, the clinician must maintain a high index of suspicion when evaluating lesions of the anal canal and margin. The use of primary chemoradiation for SCC of the anal canal has resulted in equivalent, if not superior, local control and survival compared with radical surgery, and results in sphincter preservation in over two thirds of cases. Nevertheless, abdominoperineal resection still plays an important role in salvage of treatment failures, and also for patients who are unlikely to tolerate chemoradiation or have pre-existing impaired continence. Recent studies indicate that variations in chemotherapeutic agents and radiation technique might potentially produce even better results. The prognosis for anorectal melanoma, as well as for small cell and undifferentiated tumors, continues to be poor. Fortunately, these are relatively rare tumors.

Salvage abdominoperineal resection in anal epidermoid cancer

BACKGROUND

In the management of isolated locoregional failure after (chemo)radiation therapy for anal epidermoid cancer, salvage abdominoperineal resection (APR) is the treatment of choice. The results of a 15-year consecutive population-based series are reviewed.

METHODS

Details of all patients with anal epidermoid cancer treated from 1985 to 2000 in the Stockholm Health Care Region were recorded prospectively. Among 308 patients with biopsy-proven anal epidermoid cancer, there have been 39 isolated locoregional failures after sphincter-preserving therapy. Thirty-five patients have undergone salvage APR. The medical records of these 35 patients were reviewed retrospectively with regard to surgical and oncological results.

RESULTS

There were no postoperative deaths. There was considerable morbidity related to the perineal wound, with postoperative perineal infections in 13 patients and delayed healing beyond 3 months in 23 patients. Complications unrelated to the perineal wound were found in 13 patients. The crude 5-year survival rate for the 35 patients was 52 per cent (median follow-up 33 months). Patients with persistent disease fared significantly worse than those with locoregional recurrence (crude 5-year survival rate 33 versus 82 per cent; P < 0.05, log rank test).

CONCLUSION

Salvage APR in anal epidermoid cancer is associated with a high complication rate but may result in long-term survival.