Low-dose rate brachytherapy with I-125 seeds has an excellent 5-year outcome with few side effects in patients with low-risk prostate cancer

Computer-aided segmentation on MRI for prostate radiotherapy, Part I: Quantifying human interobserver variability of the prostate and organs at risk and its impact on radiation dosimetry

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Quantifying the interobserver variability (IoV) of prostate and periprostatic anatomy delineation on prostate MRI is necessary to inform its use for treatment planning, treatment delivery, and treatment quality assessment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty five prostate cancer patients underwent MRI-based low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy (LDRPBT). The patients were scanned with a 3D T2-weighted sequence for treatment planning and a 3D T2/T1-weighted sequence for quality assessment. Seven observers involved with the LDRPBT workflow delineated the prostate, external urinary sphincter (EUS), seminal vesicles, rectum, and bladder on all 50 MRIs. IoV was assessed by measuring contour similarity metrics, differences in organ volumes, and differences in dosimetry parameters between unique observer pairs. Measurements from a group of 3 radiation oncologists (G1) were compared against those from a group consisting of the other 4 clinical observers (G2).

RESULTS

IoV of the prostate was lower for G1 than G2 (Matthew's correlation coefficient [MCC], G1 vs. G2: planning-0.906 vs. 0.870, p < 0.001; postimplant-0.899 vs. 0.861, p < 0.001). IoV of the EUS was highest of all the organs for both groups, but was lower for G1 (MCC, G1 vs. G2: planning-0.659 vs. 0.402, p < 0.001; postimplant-0.684 vs. 0.398, p < 0.001). Large differences in prostate dosimetry parameters were observed (G1 maximum absolute prostate ΔD90: planning-76.223 Gy, postimplant-36.545 Gy; G1 maximum absolute prostate ΔV100: planning-13.927%, postimplant-8.860%).

CONCLUSIONS

While MRI is optimal in the management of prostate cancer with radiation therapy, significant interobserver variability of the prostate and external urinary sphincter still exist.

Acute and late side-effects after low dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer; incidence, management and technical considerations

PURPOSE

To review common reported side effects and complications after primary LDR-BT (monotherapy) and discuss some of the technical aspects that could impact the treatment outcomes.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A literature search was undertaken using medical subject headings (MeSH) complemented by the authors' personal and institutional expertise.

RESULTS

The reported incidence of acute and late grade 2 or above urinary, bowel and sexual side effects is very variable across the literature. The learning curve and the implant quality have a clear impact on the toxicity outcomes. Being aware of some of the technical challenges encountered during the procedure and ways to mitigate them could decrease the incidence of side effects. Careful planning of seed placement and seed deposition allow sparing of the organs at risk and a lower incidence of urinary and gastro-intestinal toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Low dose-rate brachytherapy remains a standard monotherapy treatment in the setting of favorable-risk prostate cancer. High disease control and low long-term toxicities are achievable in expert hands with a good technique.

Treatment of low-risk prostate cancer: a retrospective study with 477 patients comparing external beam radiotherapy and I-125 seeds brachytherapy in terms of biochemical control and late side effects

PURPOSE

The goal of our study was comparison of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and I‑125 seeds brachytherapy in terms of biochemical control and development of late gastrointestinal and genitourinary side effects.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

477 low-risk prostate cancer patients treated between 2000 and 2019 at our department using either I‑125 seeds brachytherapy or EBRT with a dose of 74 or 78 Gy were reviewed for our analysis. 213 patients were treated with EBRT and 264 with seeds.

RESULTS

Patients were followed up yearly with a median follow-up of 70 (3-192) months. The biochemical no evidence of disease (bNED) rates after 5 years were 95% for both EBRT and seeds, and after 10 years 87% for EBRT and 94% for seeds using the Phoenix criteria, although no significant difference was observed. Concerning gastrointestinal side effects, EBRT showed significantly higher rates of RTOG grade ≥2 toxicity compared to seeds, but at no point in follow-up more than 15% of all patients. On the other hand, genitourinary side effects were significantly more prevalent in patients treated with seeds, with 40% RTOG grade ≥2 toxicity 12 months after treatment. Nevertheless, both types of side effects decreased over time.

CONCLUSION

Both EBRT and seeds provide excellent biochemical control with bNED rates after 10 years of about 90%. In terms of side effects, patients treated with seeds show higher grades of genitourinary side effects, while patients treated with EBRT show higher grades of gastrointestinal side effects.

Toxicity in patients treated with permanent prostate brachytherapy using intraoperatively built custom-linked seeds versus loose seeds

Purpose

Low-dose-rate brachytherapy (BT) with permanent iodine-125 radioactive seeds is a highly effective treatment option for low- and favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer. However, optimal implantation is not always achieved due to edema or seeds loss. One way to improve seed placement is the use of stranded seeds called "intraoperatively built custom-linked seeds (IBCLS)" in an opposition to loose seeds (LS). To date, there are few data comparing toxicity rates between these two techniques. The aim of this study was to compare dosimetric parameters and toxicity rates at 2 years between both procedures in a matched-paired population.

Material and methods

Patients were considered for BT according to European guidelines. Among 548 patients treated at our institution, 105 patients in the loose seeds cohort were individually matched to 105 patients in the IBCLS group according to age, prostate volume, pre-operative international prostate symptom score (IPSS), clinical stage, and Gleason score. Erectile function was scored using the five-item international index of erectile function (IIEF-5) score. A multivariable linear mixed-effects model was applied to examine the association between total and individual scores (repeated measures) and covariates.

Results

Overall, 61 (29%) patients presented with a favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer. There were no significant changes in IPSS over time (p = 0.57). During follow-up, the IIEF-5 was similar in the two groups, except at one month, where it was lower in the IBCLS group (10.9 vs. 6.9, p = 0.029). Also, there was no difference in grade ≥ 2 rectal toxicity. At 1 month, D_90Gy, V_150%, and V_100% were higher in the LS group compared to the IBCLS group.

Conclusions

Low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy using IBCLS is a safe technique, with comparable toxicity profiles at 2 years compared to LS brachytherapy.

Relationship between radiation doses and erectile function deterioration in patients with localized prostate cancer treated with permanent prostate brachytherapy

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the relationship between radiation doses in prostate brachytherapy and deterioration of erectile function in patients with localized prostate cancer.

METHODS

A longitudinal survey study was carried out among 261 prostate cancer patients who received prostate brachytherapy. A total of 48 patients were potent at baseline and they did not receive any supplemental therapy preoperatively. Dosimetry parameters of the whole prostate gland, prostate apex, urethra and rectum were collected using the VariSeed 8.0 treatment planning system (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA, USA). We carried out a logistic regression analysis to clarify the relationship between radiation doses and erectile function deterioration, which was assessed using the International Index of Erectile Function-15 questionnaire.

RESULTS

The median patient age was 66 years (range 53-70 years) with a median follow-up time of 44 months (36-71 months). The mean total International Index of Erectile Function-15 score decreased from 49.9 at baseline to 34.7 after 12 months (P < 0.001), but gradually plateaued within 36 months. Erectile function deterioration was noted in 32 (66.7%) patients 36 months after prostate brachytherapy. In an analysis of risk factors for erectile function deterioration after prostate brachytherapy, age ≥70 years (P = 0.029), prostate V100 ≥95% (P = 0.024), apex V100 ≥95% (P = 0.024), apex V150 ≥70% (P = 0.009) and apex D90 ≥150 Gy (P = 0.011) correlated with erectile function deterioration. A multivariate analysis identified an age of ≥70 years (odds ratio 7.91, P = 0.024) and apex V150 ≥70% (odds ratio 7.75, P = 0.007) as independent risk factors for erectile function deterioration after prostate brachytherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

An excessive radiation dose, particularly to the prostate apex area, and an advanced age might have a negative impact on the preservation of potency after prostate brachytherapy.

Dose to the penile bulb and individual patient anatomy are predictive of erectile dysfunction in men treated with 125I low dose rate brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer

Background: To evaluate the occurrence of erectile dysfunction at 3 years (3yED) after prostate brachytherapy (BT) and to predict 3yED after treatment based on patients and treatments characteristics. Material and methods: From September 2007 to July 2015, 117 men with mild or no ED [International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) > 16] underwent ¹²⁵Iodine real-time ultrasound-guided low-dose rate BT to a total dose of 160 Gy for low-risk or favorable intermediate-risk prostate adenocarcinoma, and were followed prospectively during 3 years. Median age was 63 years (51-79). The post-implant dosimetric parameters on the postoperative computer tomography were derived from the dose-volume histogram of the prostate and the penile bulb (PB), crura, neurovascular bundles (NVBs) and internal pudendal arteries (IPAs). Potential clinical confounding factors were collected. Additionally, anatomical indexes reflecting the prostate anatomical location within the pelvis were studied. These variables were compared between patients with and without 3yED. 3yED was defined as an IIEF-5 score change to the lower category between baseline, with or without medication. Results: The 3yED rate was 59% (62% maintained an IIEF-5 > 16). On multivariate analysis, prostate D90% (p > .5) and pretreatment characteristics including age (p > .5), pre-implant potency (p > .5), diabetes (p = .08) and high cardiovascular risk rates (p = .1) did not influence the occurrence of 3yED. Only the PB dose especially the D10% > 51 Gy was associated with 3yED (p = .005). Conversely, dose to the crura, IPAs or NVBs did not seem to impact the erectile function. The prostate position, especially the apex location varied significantly between potent and impotent patients and 3yED was significantly associated with close position of the prostate apex to PB (p = .008). Conclusion: The most predictive factor of 3yED was the dose to the PB. This may be explained by variation in individual patients' anatomy and this could allow for the development of better strategies to prevent ED.

Correlation between real-time intraoperative and postoperative dosimetry and its implications on intraoperative planning

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to study the correlation between intraoperative and postimplant dosimetry. We investigated the correlation between prostate (V₁₅₀) and urethra (D₃₀, D₅) dose limits, and whether it is possible to increase prostate D₉₀ and V₁₀₀ in intraoperative planning without violating postimplant urethra and rectum dose limits.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Seventy-nine patients who underwent real-time ultrasound-guided prostate implants using intraoperative planning from 2013 to 2017 were analyzed. Forty-one of the 79 implants were ¹²⁵I as monotherapy and the remainder was ¹⁰³Pd as boost to external beam radiation therapy or external beam radiation therapy plus androgen deprivation therapy. Prescriptions followed the guidelines of AAPM TG-137. The urethra was catheterized during intraoperative implantation and postimplant imaging to facilitate the urethra identification. T2-cubed MRI and CT were acquired on the same day and about 1 month after the low-dose-rate procedure, and MRI was later fused with the CT scan for accurate delineation of the prostate and postimplant dosimetry evaluation. An institutionally based peer-review process and document procedure were established based on national recommendations. Correlation of dose parameters: D₉₀, V₁₅₀, V₁₀₀ of prostate, D₃₀, D₅ of urethra, and V₁₀₀ of rectum between intraoperative and postimplant plans were evaluated.

RESULTS

D₉₀ and V₁₀₀ declined for all implants between intraoperative and postimplant dosimetry. On average, D₉₀ declined by 17.5% and 21.7% for ¹²⁵I and ¹⁰³Pb implants, respectively. V₁₀₀ declined for all implants between intraoperative and postimplant dosimetry but less pronounced. Prostate V₁₅₀ and urethra D₃₀ and D₅ also showed different tendency of decline. Of the 79 implants, 60 did not meet the postimplant dosimetry target for prostate (V₁₅₀ ≤ 50%), and 46 of the 60 implants met the optimal dosimetry targets for both D₃₀ (<125%) and D₅ (<150%), and the other 14 of the 60 implants failed to meet either the D₃₀ or the D₅ limits. All the implants met the postimplant target dose for rectum: V₁₀₀≤ 1.3 cc.

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative implant dosimetry could not accurately predict postimplant dosimetry; however, to avoid underdosage of prostate, intraoperative D₉₀ should be close to 120% of prescribed dose and V₁₀₀ needs to be close to 100% of prescribed dose. Prostate V₁₅₀> 50% does not necessarily indicate the violation of urethra D₃₀ and D₅ dose limits. For most of the implants, target intraoperative D₉₀ and V₁₀₀ could be raised without violating urethra D₃₀ and D₅ limits recommended by American Brachytherapy Society in postimplant evaluation.

Efficacy of Iodine-125 Seed Implantation in Locoregionally Recurrent and Unresectable Breast Cancer: a Retrospective Study

The management of locoregionally recurrent and unresectable breast cancer is a therapeutic challenge. This retrospective study aimed to assess the efficacy of 125I seed implantation brachytherapy as a palliative management in locoregionally recurrent breast cancer. We analyzed 36 locoregionally recurrent and unresectable breast cancers in our hospital between 2012 and 2016. All patients were treated with CT-guided 125I seed permanent implantation. The dose distribution of 125I seeds was calculated using a computerized treatment planning system. Complete response, partial response, stable disease, and local tumor control rates were calculated. Long-term efficacy was assessed based on survival rates ranging from 1 to 4 years. The follow-up period ranged from 6 to 53 months. The median local control was 28 months (95% CI: 16.2-39.8 months). The percentage of patients who showed 6-month, 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year local control was 97.2%, 77.8%, 52.8%, and 33.3%, respectively. Median survival time for all patients was 48 months (95% CI: 40.9-55.1 months); 1-year, 2-year, 3-year, and 4-year survival rates were 97.2%, 80.6%, 63.9%, and 46.5%, respectively. Pain relief response rate was 88.9%. No serious complications were detected during the follow-up period. The results of this study demonstrate that 125I seed implantation could be considered a feasible and promising minimally invasive therapy for locoregionally recurrent and unresectable breast carcinoma.

A single institution analysis of low-dose-rate brachytherapy: 5-year reported survival and late toxicity outcomes

Purpose

To report the 5-year biochemical relapse-free survival (BRFS), overall survival (OS), and long-term toxicity outcomes of patients treated with low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy as monotherapy for low- to intermediate-risk prostate cancer.

Material and methods

Between 2004 and 2011, 371 patients were treated with LDR brachytherapy as monotherapy. Of these, 102 patients (27%) underwent transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) prior to implantation. Follow-up was performed every 3 months for 12 months, then every 6 months over 4 years and included prostate specific antigen evaluation. The biochemical relapse-free survival (BRFS) was defined according to the Phoenix criteria. Acute and late toxicities were documented using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. The BRFS and OS estimates were calculated using Kaplan-Meier plots. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate outcomes by pre-treatment clinical prognostic factors and radiation dosimetry.

Results

The median follow-up of all patients was 5.45 years. The 5-year BRFS and OS rates were 95% and 96%, respectively. The BRFS rates for patients with Gleason score (GS) > 7 and GS ≤ 6 were 96% and 91% respectively (p = 0.06). On univariate analysis, T1 and T2 staging, risk-group classification, and prostate volumes had no impact on survival at 5 years (p > 0.1). Late grade 2 and 3 genitourinary (GU) toxicities were observed in 10% and 5% of patients respectively. Additionally, patients with prior TURP had a greater incidence of late grade 2 or 3 urinary retention (p = 0.001). There were 14 deaths in total; however, none were attributed to prostate cancer.

Conclusions

LDR brachytherapy is an effective treatment option in low- to intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients. We observed low biochemical relapse rates and minimal GU toxicities several years after treatment in patients with or without TURP. However, a small risk of urinary retention was observed in some patients.

Low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy: 4-8 week postimplant prostate-specific antigen a novel predictor of biochemical failure-free survival

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between patient, disease, and treatment variables and biochemical failure-free survival (bFFS) following low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy (LDR-BT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Data from 624 consecutive patients who received LDR-BT for localized prostate cancer between 2002 and 2012 at a single institution were collected for various patient, disease, and treatment characteristics including a 4-8 week postimplant PSA (4-8wkPSA). Subgroup analysis was stratified by risk category and treatment regimen. Analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves, Cox proportional hazard ratios (HRs), and receiver-operator characteristic curves.

RESULTS

A total of 624 consecutive patients were included with followup time of 4.0 ± 3.1 years. Predictors of bFFS included PSA nadir and 4-8wkPSA (HR = 2.48, p = 0.000 and HR = 1.24, p = 0.000, respectively) for total population. Diabetes mellitus (p = 0.026), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (p = 0.000), alcohol use (p = 0.024), and age (p = 0.002) were predictors for specific subgroups. Receiver-operator characteristic curves 4-8wkPSA were found to be significant (p = 0.036).

CONCLUSION

4-8wkPSA is a novel predictor of bFFS for patients receiving LDR-BT across several risk categories and treatment regimens with potential clinical utility as a prognostic indicator. Certain comorbidities and exposure histories also demonstrated significant relationships with bFFS including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, age, alcohol history, proton pump inhibitor use, PSA nadir, and PSA density.

Prostate-Specific Antigen 5 Years following Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Low- and Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer: An Ablative Procedure?

Background

Our previous work on early PSA kinetics following prostate stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) demonstrated that an initial rapid and then slow PSA decline may result in very low PSA nadirs. This retrospective study sought to evaluate the PSA nadir 5 years following SBRT for low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PCa).

Methods

65 low- and 80 intermediate-risk PCa patients were treated definitively with SBRT to 35–37.5 Gy in 5 fractions at Georgetown University Hospital between January 2008 and October 2011. Patients who received androgen deprivation therapy were excluded from this study. Biochemical relapse was defined as a PSA rise >2 ng/ml above the nadir and analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method. The PSA nadir was defined as the lowest PSA value prior to biochemical relapse or as the lowest value recorded during follow-up. Prostate ablation was defined as a PSA nadir <0.2 ng/ml. Univariate logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate relevant variables on the likelihood of achieving a PSA nadir <0.2 ng/ml.

Results

The median age at the start of SBRT was 72 years. These patients had a median prostate volume of 36 cc with a median 25% of total cores involved. At a median follow-up of 5.6 years, 86 and 37% of patients achieved a PSA nadir ≤0.5 and <0.2 ng/ml, respectively. The median time to PSA nadir was 36 months. Two low and seven intermediate risk patients experienced a biochemical relapse. Regardless of the PSA outcome, the median PSA nadir for all patients was 0.2 ng/ml. The 5-year biochemical relapse free survival (bRFS) rate for low- and intermediate-risk patients was 98.5 and 95%, respectively. Initial PSA (p = 0.024) and a lower testosterone at the time of the PSA nadir (p = 0.049) were found to be significant predictors of achieving a PSA nadir <0.2 ng/ml.

Conclusion

SBRT for low- and intermediate-risk PCa is a convenient treatment option with low PSA nadirs and a high rate of early bRFS. Fewer than 40% of patients, however, achieved an ablative PSA nadir. Thus, the role of further dose escalation is an area of active investigation.