The evolving management of small bowel adenocarcinoma

Trending of small bowel adenocarcinoma research from 2000 to 2022: A bibliometric analysis

Small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) is a rare tumor entity with a relatively poor prognosis. Diagnosis and management of SBA are still challenging despite recent advancement of diagnostic methods and publication of guidelines. This study aimed to analyze and visualize the trending of SBA research in the past 22 years in the 21st century through bibliometric analysis. Our study collected 1270 publication records of SBA from 2000 Jan 1st to 2022 December 31 from Web of Science and used VOSviewer and CiteSpace to analyze countries, institutions, journals, authors, references and keywords to present the latest trends in SBA research. The USA was the most productive country in terms of the total number of publications (n = 418). The Mayo Clinic (n = 22) and University of Texas MD Cancer Center (n = 22) were the institutions with top publications. The "World Journal Of Gastroenterology" (n = 30) had the largest publications. Overman Michael J (n = 17) was the most active and prolific author. The "small bowel adenocarcinoma" was the most frequent keyword. Our bibliometric analysis provides a comprehensive overview of the trends and gaps in the research of SBA. Despite the challenges faced, researchers from USA, Japan and China have made significant contributions to the field of SBA research, and further research is necessary to develop evidence-based guidelines, and advance the understanding and management of SBA.

Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in small bowel adenocarcinoma with peritoneal metastasis: a systematic review

Objectives

Small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) with peritoneal metastasis (PM) is rare and despite treatment with systemic chemotherapy, the prognosis is poor. However, there is emerging evidence that cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) may offer a survival benefit over systemic therapy alone. This systematic review will assess the effectiveness of CRS-HIPEC for SBA-PM.

Content

Three databases were searched from inception to 11/10/21. Clinical outcomes were extracted and analysed.

Summary

A total of 164 cases of SBA-PM undergoing CRS-HIPEC were identified in 12 studies. The majority of patients had neoadjuvant chemotherapy (87/164, 53%) and complete cytoreduction (143/164, 87%) prior to HIPEC. The median overall survival was 9-32 months and 5-year survival ranged from 25 to 40%. Clavien-Dindo grade III/IV morbidity ranged between 19.1 and 50%, while overall mortality was low with only 3 treatment-related deaths.

Outlook

CRS-HIPEC has the potential to improve the overall survival in a highly selected group of SBA-PM patients, with 5-year survival rates comparable to those reported in colorectal peritoneal metastases. However, the expected survival benefits need to be balanced against the intrinsic risk of morbidity and mortality associated with the procedure. Further multicentre studies are required to assess the safety and feasibility of CRS-HIPEC in SBA-PM to guide best practice management for this rare disease.

Clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors of elderly small intestine adenocarcinoma using propensity score matching analysis: a study based on SEER database

BACKGROUND

Small intestine adenocarcinoma (SIA) is a scant disease that has no adequate clinical trials, so its prognostic factors are still unclear, especially in elderly patients. In this article, we aimed to explore the clinicopathology presentation, treatments, outcomes, and predictors of small intestine adenocarcinoma patients aged 65 years or older.

METHODS

We retrieved clinicopathology data of small intestine adenocarcinoma patients diagnosed between 2004 and 2015 from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. We clarified patients into two groups: the surgery and the non-surgery group and conducted propensity score matching (PSM) to compare survival outcoming. We identified the prognostic indicators for cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) by the Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

In total, 1018 eligible cases were enrolled, with a median survival of 16 months; the 3-year OS and CSS rates were 36% and 41.7%, and the 5-year OS and CSS rates were 26.5% and 33.3%. Multivariate analyses revealed that age, grade, tumor stage, surgery, and chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors for OS, while grade, tumor stage, surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy were independent factors for CSS. After PSM, only surgery and tumor stage (AJCC 6th) were independent prognostic factors for OS and CSS.

CONCLUSION

Surgery could bring benefit to survival for elderly SIA patients, and the early stage of the disease was another significant prognostic factor.

Endoscopy for the diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal bleeding caused by malignancy

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding secondary to malignancy can be challenging. Endoscopy is the gold standard to diagnose and treat gastrointestinal bleeding but clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with malignancy-related bleeding are not well understood. This study aims to look at clinical characteristics, endoscopic findings, safety and clinical outcomes of endoscopic interventions for GI malignancy-related bleeding.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed outcomes of patients with confirmed GI malignancies who underwent endoscopy for GI bleeding at MD Anderson Cancer Center between 2010 and 2019. Cox hazard analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with survival.

RESULTS

A total of 313 patients were included, with median age of 59 years; 74.8% were male. The stomach (30.0%) was the most common tumor location. Active bleeding was evident endoscopically in 47.3% of patients. Most patients (77.3%) did not receive endoscopic treatment. Of the patients who received endoscopic treatment, 57.7% had hemostasis. No endoscopy-related adverse events were recorded. Endoscopic treatment was associated with hemostasis (P < 0.001), but not decreased recurrent bleeding or mortality. Absence of active bleeding on endoscopy, stable hemodynamic status at presentation, lower cancer stage, and surgical intervention were associated with improved survival.

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicates that endoscopy is a safe diagnostic tool in this patient population; while endoscopic treatments may help achieve hemostasis, it may not decrease the risk of recurrent bleeding or improve survival.

Survival effects of primary and metastatic surgical treatment in metastatic small intestinal tumors: A propensity score–matching study

Objective

To analyze the effects of primary tumor resection and metastatic lesion resection on the survival of metastatic small intestinal tumors.

Methods

The research subjects were patients with metastatic small bowel tumors identified from 2004 to 2016 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Propensity score matching and Kaplan–Meier analyses were performed to analyze the effect of surgery on the prognosis.

Results

A total of 4,034 patients from the SEER database were analyzed. Both before and after the propensity score–matching analysis, the prognosis of patients who underwent primary tumor surgery and metastatic surgery was better than that of patients who did not undergo surgery; all were patients with metastatic small bowel adenocarcinoma (mSIA) or metastatic small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors (mSI-NETs) (all p < .005). Patients with mSIA and adequate lymph node dissection had a longer prognosis than mSIA patients with inadequate lymph node dissection, but this survival benefit was not present in mSI-NET patients. It made no difference in the prognosis of mSIA and mSI-NETs whether localized surgery or intestine-ectomy was performed. Patients with mSIA who underwent primary and metastatic excision plus chemotherapy had the best overall survival and cancer-specific survival rates, whereas mSI-NET patients who underwent primary and metastatic excision had the best overall survival and cancer-specific survival rates (all p < .001).

Conclusion

In these carefully selected patients, primary tumor resection and/or metastatic lesion resection significantly improved the survival rates for patients with mSIA and mSI-NETs. The mSIA patients with resectable primary tumors seemed to require a sufficient number of lymph node dissections more than the patients with well-differentiated mSI-NETs.

Localized Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma Management: Evidence Summary

Small bowel cancers are rare diseases whose prognosis is poorer than that of colon cancers. Due to disease rarity, there is little data on small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) treatment, and most recommendations come from expert agreements or analogies to the management of colon cancer. Although relatively high rates of local recurrence are observed for duodenal malignancies, distant metastatic relapse remains common and requires adjuvant systemic therapy. Given the similarities between SBA and colorectal cancer, radiotherapy and chemotherapy strategies used for the latter disease are frequently pursued for the former disease, specifically for tumors located in the duodenum. However, no previous randomized study has evaluated the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy on the overall survival of SBA patients. Most previous studies on treatment outcomes and prognostic factors in this context were based on large international databases, such as the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results or the National Cancer Database. Studies are required to establish and validate prognostic and predictive markers relevant in this context to inform the use of (neo) adjuvant treatment. Among those, deficient mismatch repair tumors represent 20% of SBAs, but their impact on chemosensitivity remains unknown. Herein, we summarize the current evidence on the management of localized SBA, including future perspectives.

Risk and Prognostic Factors for Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma: A Multicenter Retrospective Observational Study in China

Background

Small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) is a rare malignancy that accounts for 3% of all gastrointestinal tumors. We evaluated the clinical characteristics, outcomes, and prognostic factors of primary SBAs.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the clinicopathological features and clinical outcomes of 300 patients with SBA from three institutions in China between January 2003 and July 2020. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and it was statistically compared using the log-rank test. Single-variable and multivariate analyses were used to identify the significant correlates of OS.

Results

The primary tumor was on the duodenal papilla in 156 patients (52%), in the duodenum in 60 patients (20%), and in the jejunum-ileum in 84 patients (28%). The median OS of the entire cohort was 32.5 months (range, 0-213 months), with a 1-year OS rate of 78.0%. For jejunoileal adenocarcinoma, advanced age, advanced T stage, advanced N stage, more positive lymph nodes, distant metastasis, high carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio < 2.32 predicted worse survival on single-variable analysis. Multivariate analysis showed that advanced age, advanced tumor node metastases (TNM) stage, high CEA level, high alpha fetoprotein (AFP) level, and low prealbumin level were independent prognostic factors for non-ampullary SBA. The independent prognostic factors for duodenal papilla adenocarcinoma included TNM Stage III, nerve invasion, low platelet/lymphocyte ratio, and high CA19-9.

Conclusion

We found different independent prognostic factors for tumors at different locations. This finding warrants further investigation to ensure more effective management strategies for SBA.

Therapeutic Strategies for Patients with Advanced Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma: Current Knowledge and Perspectives

Small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) is diagnosed at an advanced (unresectable or metastatic) tumor stage in approximately one-third of cases. This is partly due to the non-specific symptomatology and limitations in endoscopic and radiologic detection methods. In this context, the prognosis remains poor and systemic chemotherapy appears to benefit patients when compared to best supportive care alone, despite the absence of randomized controlled trials. The results of a recent large prospective cohort (ARCAD-NADEGE) reported that the absence of chemotherapy was a predictive factor for a lower overall survival (OS) even though poor differentiation and SBA associated with Crohn's disease correlate with poor prognosis. In retrospective series, the median OS ranges from approximately 9 to 18 months with current treatment approaches. A combination of a fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX or CAPOX) appears to be the most utilized and effective first-line chemotherapy regimen. Other front-line alternatives are the combination of 5-FU and cisplatin or fluoropyrimidine and irinotecan (FOLFIRI). In second-line, FOLFIRI is an effective option after progression on platinum-based therapy. Taxane-based therapy appears to be an alternative option, but further evaluation in larger series is needed. To a limited extent, the role of surgical resection for metastatic disease appears to be a valid option, though this approach has not been evaluated in prospective clinical studies. Due to the rareness of the disease, inclusion in clinical trials should be prioritized, and there is hope that targeted therapies and immunotherapy may enter the therapeutic arsenal for these patients.

Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma: From Molecular Insights to Clinical Management

Small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) is a rare malignancy, with a rising incidence in recent decades, and accounts for roughly 40% of all cancers of the small bowel. The majority of SBAs arise in the duodenum and are associated with a dismal prognosis. Surgery remains the mainstay of treatment for localized disease, while systemic treatments parallel those used in colorectal cancer (CRC), both in the adjuvant and palliative setting. In fact, owing to the lack of prospective data supporting its optimal management, SBA has historically been treated in the same way as CRC. However, recent genetic and molecular data suggest a distinct profile from other gastrointestinal malignancies and support a more nuanced approach to its management. Herein, we briefly review the state-of-the-art in the clinical management of early-stage and advanced disease and recent discoveries of potentially actionable genetic alterations or pathways along with the most promising ongoing clinical trials, which will hopefully revolutionize the treatment landscape of this orphan disease in the foreseeable future.

Metachronous small bowel adenocarcinoma after rectal adenocarcinoma: A case report

RATIONALE

Small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA), an uncommon gastrointestinal malignant tumor, is difficult to diagnose at an early stage because of its non-specific disease presentation. Metachronous SBA is a special type of SBA that is rarely reported. We herein report a case of metachronous primary SBA following resection of rectal adenocarcinoma.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 65-year-old man presented to our hospital after having experienced recurrent bowel obstruction for 6 months. He had undergone a Dixon operation 30 months previously followed by adjuvant chemotherapy with capecitabine plus oxaliplatin.

DIAGNOSIS

Abdominal computed tomography showed thickened bowel walls in the right lower abdomen, and the patient was initially misdiagnosed with intestinal adhesion. After the operation, he was diagnosed with primary SBA (T3N0M0, stage IIA).

INTERVENTIONS

Treatment with a transnasal ileus tube was ineffective. Therefore, we performed small intestinal segmental resection and side-to-side anastomosis through open surgery.

OUTCOMES

The patient completed all postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, and posttreatment surveillance revealed no further abnormalities.

LESSONS

This case suggests that patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma may have an increased risk of metachronous SBA. Corresponding symptoms in high-risk patients should raise clinicians' suspicion for SBA, and further detailed examinations are imperative. Early screening for SBA may help to improve the patients' prognosis.

Clinical features, treatment, and prognosis of different histological types of primary small bowel adenocarcinoma: A propensity score matching analysis based on the SEER database

PURPOSE

This aim of this study was to provide a comprehensive understanding of the clinical characteristics, treatment, and prognosis of patients with small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA), mucinous small bowel adenocarcinoma (MSBA), and signet ring cell carcinoma of the small bowel (SRCSB).

METHODS

Information on patients with SBA, MSBA, and SRCSB (2004-2015) was obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. Cox proportional hazards models and Kaplan-Meier curves were used for the survival analyses. Propensity-score matching (PSM) was implemented to determine the differences among these tumors.

RESULTS

In all, 3697 patients with SBA (n = 3196), MSBA (n = 325) and SRCSB (n = 176) were ultimately eligible for this study. Poor differentiation, local invasion, and lymph node metastasis were more likely to be observed in SRCSB than in SBA and MSBA. Surgery was the most common treatment modality in all groups. The prognosis of SBA was similar to that of MSBA, but better than that of SRCSB in both unmatched and matched cohorts. M stage, surgery, and chemotherapy were identified as independent predictors of survival in all patients. Surgery and chemotherapy could significantly improve outcomes in all groups before and after PSM. Radiotherapy was associated with a survival benefit in patients with SBA, but this trend was not maintained after PSM. Survival advantages of SBA and MSBA were remarkable in the stratified analysis of surgery after PSM.

CONCLUSION

Patients with SRCSB had the worst prognosis among all histological types examined. However, surgery and chemotherapy could improve patients survival, regardless of histological type.

Personalized four-category staging for predicting prognosis in patients with small bowel Adenocarcinoma: an international development and validation study

BACKGROUND

Log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) classification showed superiority over 8^th edition N staging in predicting survival of small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) patients. The aim of this study was to develop and validate the Tumor, LODDS, and Metastasis (TLM) staging of SBA.

METHODS

Totally 1789 SBA patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 1988-2010, 437 patients from SEER database between 2011-2013 and 166 patients from multicenters were categorized into development, validation and test cohort, respectively. The TLM staging was developed in the development cohort using Ensemble Algorithm for Clustering Cancer Data (EACCD) method. C-index was used to assess the performance of the TLM staging in predicting cancer-specific survival (CSS) and was compared with the traditional 8^th edition TNM staging.

FINDINGS

Four-category TLM staging designed for the development cohort showed higher discriminatory power than TNM staging in predicting CSS in the development cohort (0.682 vs. 0.650, P < 0.001), validation cohort (0.682 vs. 0.654, P = 0.022), and test cohort (0.659 vs. 0.611, P = 0.023), respectively. TLM staging continued to show its higher predictive efficacy than the 8^th TNM in TNM stage II/III patients or in patients with lymph node yield less than 8.

INTERPRETATION

TLM staging showed a better prognostic performance than the 8^th TNM staging especially TNM stage II/III or patients with lymph node yield less than 8 and therefore, could serve to complement the TNM staging in patients with SBA.

FUNDING

A full list of funding bodies that contributed to this study can be found in the Acknowledgements section.

Advances with pharmacotherapy for peritoneal metastasis

INTRODUCTION

A new treatment strategy involving cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with perioperative intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy was proposed in 1999 by the Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International, and the strategy is now justified as a state-of-the-art treatment to improve the long-term survival of patients with peritoneal metastasis (PM). To achieve cure in the patients with PM, complete removal of macroscopic tumors and eradication of micrometastasis on the peritoneum, left after CRS are essential. Systemic chemotherapy is not indicated for the treatment of PM. In contrast, intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy brings about significantly higher locoregional dose intensity in the peritoneal cavity and subperitoneal tissues. In combination with anticancer drugs, hyperthermia enhances cytotoxicity against cancer cells.

AREA COVERED

This article provides a systematic overview of PM from various cancers including gastric, colorectal, small bowel, appendiceal cancer, and mesothelioma. It also includes all the essential aspects of therapy.

EXPERT OPINION

CRS plus perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy is safe with acceptable morbidity and mortality. It is justified as a standard treatment to improve the long-term survival of patients with PM and is now performed with curative intent for PM from various malignancies.

Small Bowel Adenocarcinomas: Impact of Location on Survival

BACKGROUND

Proximal (duodenal) small bowel adenocarcinomas have a worse prognosis than distal (jejuno-ileal) tumors, but differences in patient, tumor, and treatment factors between locations remain unclear.

METHODS

Patients in the National Cancer Database with surgically resected pathologic stage I-IV small bowel adenocarcinomas between 2004 and 2015 were analyzed. Clinical stage IV patients were excluded.

RESULTS

Proximal tumors (n = 3767) were more likely to be higher grade (OR 1.52, CI 1.22-1.85 for moderately; OR 1.83, CI 1.49-2.33 for poorly differentiated, P < 0.01 for both) and have positive lymph nodes (OR 2.04, CI 1.30-3.23, P < 0.01), while distal tumors (n = 3252) were likely to be larger (OR 1.31, CI 1.07-1.60 for size > 5 cm, P < 0.01). Proximal tumors were associated with worse overall survival (OS) and stage-specific survival compared with distal tumors (all P < 0.01). Cox regression analysis of the entire cohort showed worse survival with community versus academic cancer programs, higher comorbidity scores, pathologic stage IV, poorly differentiated histology, positive nodal or margin status, and proximal location, while female gender, larger tumor size, and chemotherapy predicted better survival. On separate Cox regression analyses of each location, neoadjuvant chemotherapy was associated with better OS in the proximal cohort (HR 0.70, CI 0.55-0.88, P < 0.01), while adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with better OS for both proximal (HR 0.49, CI 0.42-0.57, P < 0.01) and distal tumors (HR 0.68, CI 0.57-0.81, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Proximal small bowel adenocarcinomas are associated with worse overall and stage-specific survival. This may be due to tumor biologic differences as proximal tumors were more likely to have higher grade. Future studies should further investigate differences between proximal and distal tumors to guide targeted treatment algorithms.

Quality indicators in enteroscopy. Enteroscopy procedure

Within the project "Quality Indicators in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy," under the leadership of the Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva (SEPD), our goal is to propose the procedures and the structure, process, and outcome indicators required for the application and assessment of quality in enteroscopy. To this end a search was performed for quality indicators in enteroscopy. Quality of evidence was measured by using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) system, and classified as high, moderate, low, and very low. A total of 10 process indicators (one preprocedure, eight procedure, one postprocedure) were identified for enteroscopy, with appropriate indication and choice of most efficient route being most significant.

Surgical Management of Jejunal Tumors: Experience from Tertiary Care Centre

INTRODUCTION

Small bowel is an uncommon site for primary neoplasm in the gastrointestinal tract. Traditionally, duodenum has been combined with jejunum and ileum in analysing the presentation and management of these tumors. Given the different presentation pattern, diagnostic difficulties and anatomical considerations, jejunal tumors may differ from duodenal tumors.

METHODOLOGY

Retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of patients with histology proven jejunal tumors was done. Clinico-radiological characters, histological findings, surgical procedures and the outcomes in these patients were studied.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients were included in the study. Median age at presentation was 42 years (26-76 years) and majority were males (n = 11, 68.8%). Seven (43.7%) patients presented with emergencies. Endoscopic tissue diagnosis could be obtained in 5 (31.3%) patients. Histology of tumors were adenocarcinoma, gastrointestinal stromal tumor and lymphoma in 6 (37.5%), 5 (31.3%) and 3 (18.8%) respectively. Sarcoma (myxofibroma) and metastasis (urothelial origin) were present in one patient each. Two patients with adenocarcinoma had neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Curative resection was feasible in 14 patients. Resection of tumor-bearing segment with anastomosis was performed in 9 patients. Among these, 5 had duodenojejunostomy. One patient had resection and double-barrel jejunostomy. One patient with jejunal GIST had sleeve resection. Multi-visceral resection was performed in 3 patients. There were no mortality and median postoperative hospital stay was 11 days (range 7-33 days).

CONCLUSION

Histology spectrum of jejunal tumors are distinct. Difficulty in obtaining preoperative tissue diagnosis of these lesions need to be addressed by improved endoscopic and image-directed biopsy techniques.

[Lymphadenectomy in oncological visceral surgery-Part 2 : Cancer of the upper and lower intestinal tract]

In cancers of the upper and lower intestinal tract the risk of lymphatic metastases depends on the histological results, tumor grading, and depth of tumor infiltration (T-stage). Pretherapeutic staging is of particular importance for determining the surgical strategy (local excision vs. en bloc resection with regional lymphadenectomy) as well as for evaluating the necessity of neoadjuvant therapy. While the first part on "Lymphadenectomy in oncological visceral surgery" focused on hepatobiliary and pancreatic cancer, this second part contains an overview of anatomical conditions of lymphatic drainage of the esophagus, stomach, duodenum, small intestine, colon, rectum and anus. Based on this, the principles and techniques of lymphadenectomy for cancer in these organs and the requirements on systematic regional lymphadenectomy in the actual TNM classification (8th edition) are discussed.

An Examination of Lymph Node Sampling as a Predictor of Survival in Resected Node-Negative Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma: a SEER Database Analysis

BACKGROUND

Small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) is a rare disease. Current recommendations are largely extrapolated from the colorectal literature. For node-negative (N -ve) cases, optimally stratifying cases into high or low risk, may help define optimal management. The objective of this analysis was to determine the importance of lymph node sampling for prognostication and to define what number of lymph nodes sampled is adequate.

METHODS

Cases of non-metastatic SBA with complete staging, pathologic, and demographic information were selected from the SEER database and SAS 9.4 software was used. Variables included age, gender, race, grade, TNM staging, and number of lymph nodes were examined. Comparisons were made between N -ve and N +ve cases. Survival analysis using N -ve cases was performed to characterize the impact of nodal sampling on survival and to determine which nodal cut-offs best predict survival.

RESULTS

A total of 523 cases from 2004 to 2014 were included in this analysis. Statistically significant differences identified included the median number of nodes sampled between the N -ve and N +ve groups, and the distribution of T stage and grade. Survival analysis in the N -ve cases demonstrated that the strongest predictor of survival was sampling of 16 or more lymph nodes.

CONCLUSION

In this analysis, lymph node sampling was shown to be the most important pathologic predictor of survival in cases of N -ve SBA. Replicating these findings in a secondary dataset and determining whether a clinical benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy exists for SBA patients with inadequate sampling are both important next steps.

Clinical characteristics of primary small bowel adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Adenocarcinoma of the small bowel is rare in comparison with other gastrointestinal malignancies but its incidence is rising. The non-specific symptoms with which they present often pose a high rate of missed diagnosis and misdiagnosis. It is of great significance to explore the clinical characteristics of small bowel adenocarcinoma in order to improve its early diagnosis and prognosis.

AIM

To analyze the clinical characteristic of primary small bowel adenocarcinoma, in order to improve its early diagnosis and prognosis.

METHODS

From January 2012 to September 2017, 98 patients with pathologically diagnosed primary small bowel adenocarcinoma at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University were retrospectively enrolled.

RESULTS

There were 58, 29, and 11 cases of adenocarcinoma in the duodenum, jejunum, and ileum, respectively. The common clinical manifestations included abdominal pain (47 cases), jaundice (31 cases), intestinal obstruction (25 cases), and gastrointestinal bleeding (7 cases). The examination methods included digestive tract angiography, CT, endoscopy and so on. Preoperative misdiagnosis occurred in 35 (35.7%) cases. Univariate analysis showed that misdiagnosis was related to tumor location, growth pattern, and tumor size (P < 0.05). Ninety-six patients underwent surgical treatment.

CONCLUSION

The preoperative misdiagnosis rate of primary small bowel adenocarcinoma is high due to the absence of specific clinical manifestations. The main therapy is still surgery.

Comparison of three lymph node staging schemes for predicting the outcome in patients with small bowel adenocarcinoma: A population-based cohort and international multicentre cohort study

Background

The prognostic roles of three common lymph node staging schemes, number of positive lymph nodes (pN), lymph node ratio (LNR) and log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) in small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) are unclear. We assessed their prognostic ability in SBA.

Methods

A total of 2128 patients diagnosed with SBA between 1988 and 2010 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and 186 patients from 15 hospitals in France and China were identified. We evaluated the prognostic ability of the schemes in both continuous and stratified patterns using R², Harrell's C, and time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve analyses.

Findings

For continuous pattern, the LODDS had a better capacity of discrimination and higher accuracy of prognosis than pN and LNR. Similarly, the stratified LODDS classification had a better performance of discrimination and higher accuracy of prognosis than the pN and LNR classification. The multivariable model using the LODDS classification also showed superiorly predictive accuracy and discriminatory capacity to those of the 7th and, 8th TNM node and LNR classification. These results were fully validated in an independent international multicentre cohort.

Interpretation

The LODDS scheme showed a better prognostic performance than the LNR or pN schemes in patients with SBA regardless of continuous or stratified pattern. The LODDS scheme could serve as an auxiliary to lymph node staging systems in future revisions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) manual.

Fund

This work was funded by the Zhejiang Province Natural Science Fund of China.

Patient with Lynch syndrome with subsequent development of small bowel adenocarcinoma

Small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) is a rare cancer in the general population, but the incidence increases in patients with Lynch syndrome. The present case describes a 57-year-old white woman with a history of colon cancer status posthemicolectomy and diagnosis of Lynch syndrome. Twenty years after her operation, the patient presented with vague abdominal discomfort and constipation, and underwent an exploratory laparotomy which revealed a stage 3A SBA. Genetic testing of the specimen provided evidence of microsatellite instability and faulty DNA repair supporting aetiology of Lynch syndrome. This case is unique in that SBA, if present in patients with Lynch syndrome, is usually a presenting symptom and has not been widely described in literature as an occurrence so many years after. As a result, this case highlights the importance of a low threshold for a thorough evaluation in patients with Lynch syndrome who present with signs of small bowel obstruction.