Influence of age on the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The relative risk of immune checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis in advanced non-small- cell lung cancer: Meta-analyses of controlled clinical trials

OBJECTIVE

Immune checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis (CIP) is a prevalent form of immunotherapy-induced pulmonary toxicity, ranking among the leading causes of mortality associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Despite its significance, the risk stratification of CIP in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains uncertain. In this study, we conducted a comprehensive analysis, comparing various factors such as histological types, treatment regimens, PD-L1 expression levels, and EGFR/ALK negativity in advanced NSCLC. Our investigation extends to evaluating the relative risk of developing CIP based on previous treatment history. This analysis aims to provide valuable insights for the identification of specific patient subgroups at higher risk, facilitating more effective risk management and precision therapy approaches.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were systematically searched up to February 16, 2023. We conducted a screening of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared ICI monotherapy or its combination with chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC. The trials were categorized based on histological type, treatment regimen, PD-L1 expression level, EGFR/ALK-negative status, and prior treatment history. Subsequently, the data were stratified into five subgroups, and the occurrences of all-grades (1-5) and high-grades (3-5) pneumonia events were extracted. Odds ratios (OR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were then calculated for further analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-two RCTs, encompassing 13,725 patients with advanced NSCLC, were included in this analysis. Regardless of histology (OR = 2.47, 95% CI 1.41-4.33, P = 0.002; OR = 1.84, 95% CI 1.10-3.09, P = 0.02), treatment regimen (OR = 3.27, 95% CI 2.00-5.35, P < 0.00001; OR = 2.91, 95% CI 1.98-4.27, P < 0.00001), PD-L1 expression level (OR = 5.11, 95% CI 2.58-10.12, P < 0.00001; OR = 5.15, 95% CI 2.48-10.70, P < 0.0001), negative EGFR/ALK expression (OR = 4.32, 95% CI 2.22-8.41, P < 0.0001; OR = 3.6, 95% CI 1.56-8.28, P = 0.003), whether there is a history of treatment (OR = 3.27, 95% CI 2.00-5.35, P < 0.00001; OR = 2.74, 95% CI 1.75-4.29, P < 0.0001), ICI use was associated with a higher risk of all-grade (1-5) and high-grade (3-5) pneumonia compared to chemotherapy. Subgroup analysis revealed that the squamous group, the ICI vs. combination chemotherapy (CT) group, the PD-L1 > 50% group, and the previously untreated group had a higher risk of developing all-grade and grade 3-5 CIP (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In advanced NSCLC, ICI treatment was linked to an elevated risk of pneumonitis across all grades (1-5) as well as high-grade occurrences (3-5) compared to chemotherapy. Notably, individuals with squamous histology and high PD-L1 expression, along with those lacking a history of prior treatment, demonstrated a heightened susceptibility to developing immune-related pneumonitis of all grades (1-5) and high grades (3-5). These observations provide valuable insights for clinicians seeking to enhance the management of pulmonary toxicity associated with immunotherapy.

Investigation of response factors for monotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer patients with PD-L1 expression <50

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy is currently approved for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression ≥50%. However, the efficacy of ICI monotherapy in patients with PD-L1 expression <50% has not yet been fully elucidated. The aim of this study was to identify the clinical characteristics of NSCLC patients with PD-L1 expression <50% who respond to single-agent ICIs and factors that predict response.

METHODS

Patients with advanced or recurrent NSCLC with a PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) of 50% or less who received new monotherapy with an ICI between July 2012 and December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients with response were compared with those without response in the post-treatment response assessment.

RESULTS

Among the 37 patients, six (16.2%) NSCLC patients in the response group responded to ICI monotherapy and had a significantly lower body mass index (BMI) (p = 0.003). Significantly more patients in the response group developed immune-related adverse events (irAEs) than in the nonresponse group (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified high BMI as a significant independent risk factor predicting nonresponse to ICI monotherapy in NSCLC patients with PD-L1 < 50%.

CONCLUSIONS

Among NSCLC patients with PD-L1 < 50%, those with a higher BMI were more likely to be nonresponders to ICI monotherapy. In addition, the group that responded to ICI monotherapy may have been at higher risk of developing irAEs, suggesting that careful follow-up is warranted.

Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy in elderly patients with non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Limited information on anticancer therapy for super-elderly patients with non-small-cell lung cancer is available. Immune checkpoint inhibitors offer long-term survival to elderly patients aged ≥65 years with non-small-cell lung cancer. However, the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in more elderly patients are not well understood.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients aged ≥85 years with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer at nine centers using the Okayama Lung Cancer Study Group-Immunotherapy Database.

RESULTS

Among 531 patients who received immune checkpoint inhibitors, 16 were aged ≥85 years (median, 86.5 years; range, 85-93 years). Many had high programmed death-ligand 1 expression and received pembrolizumab as first-line therapy. The objective response rate, median progression-free survival, and median survival time were 25% (95% confidence interval: 1-49), 2.8 months (95% confidence interval: 1.7-4.5), and not reached (95% confidence interval: 4.7-not reached), respectively. Moreover, the 4-year overall survival rate was 60.8% (95% confidence interval: 29.3-81.7), and a long-lasting effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors was observed even in patients aged ≥85 years. The incidence of immune-related and grade ≥3 immune-related adverse events was 32% and 6%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The effect and toxicity of immune checkpoint inhibitors for patients aged ≥85 years were acceptable. Immune checkpoint inhibitors may be a treatment option for patients aged ≥85 years.

Associated Factors to Efficacy and Tolerance of Immunotherapy in Older Patients with Cancer Aged 70 Years and Over: Impact of Coprescriptions

BACKGROUND

Immunotherapy with immune checkpoint blockers (ICB) significantly improves the prognosis for an increasing number of cancers. However, data on geriatric populations taking ICB are rare.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to identify factors associated with the efficacy and tolerance of ICB in an older population.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective monocentric study included consecutive patients aged ≥ 70 years with solid cancer who received ICB between January 2018 and December 2019. Efficacy was assessed by progression-free survival (PFS) and tolerance was defined as cessation of immunotherapy due to the occurrence of any adverse event.

RESULTS

One hundred and five patients (65.7% men) were included, mainly at the metastatic stage (95.2%); 50.5% had lung cancer. Most (80%) patients were treated with anti-PD1 (nivolumab, pembrolizumab), 19.1% with anti-PD-L1 (atezolizumab, durvalumab, and avelumab) and 0.9% with anti-CTLA4 ICB (ipilimumab). Median PFS was 3.7 months [95% confidence interval (CI) (2.75-5.70)]. PFS was shorter in univariate analysis when ICB was taken concomitantly with an antiplatelet agent (AP) [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.93; 95% CI (1.22-3.04); p = 0.005]. Tolerance was lower in univariate analysis for lung cancer [odds ratio (OR) = 3.03; 95% CI (1.07-8.56), p < 0.05] and in patients taking proton pump inhibitors (PPI) [OR = 5.50; 95% CI (1.96-15.42), p < 0.001]. There was a trend toward poorer tolerance among patients living alone [OR = 2.26; 95% CI (0.76-6.72); p = 0.14].

CONCLUSIONS

In older patients taking ICB for solid cancers, concomitant AP may influence efficacy and concomitant PPI may influence tolerance. Further studies are needed to confirm these results.

Counteracting Immunosenescence-Which Therapeutic Strategies Are Promising?

Aging attenuates the overall responsiveness of the immune system to eradicate pathogens. The increased production of pro-inflammatory cytokines by innate immune cells under basal conditions, termed inflammaging, contributes to impaired innate immune responsiveness towards pathogen-mediated stimulation and limits antigen-presenting activity. Adaptive immune responses are attenuated as well due to lowered numbers of naïve lymphocytes and their impaired responsiveness towards antigen-specific stimulation. Additionally, the numbers of immunoregulatory cell types, comprising regulatory T cells and myeloid-derived suppressor cells, that inhibit the activity of innate and adaptive immune cells are elevated. This review aims to summarize our knowledge on the cellular and molecular causes of immunosenescence while also taking into account senescence effects that constitute immune evasion mechanisms in the case of chronic viral infections and cancer. For tumor therapy numerous nanoformulated drugs have been developed to overcome poor solubility of compounds and to enable cell-directed delivery in order to restore immune functions, e.g., by addressing dysregulated signaling pathways. Further, nanovaccines which efficiently address antigen-presenting cells to mount sustained anti-tumor immune responses have been clinically evaluated. Further, senolytics that selectively deplete senescent cells are being tested in a number of clinical trials. Here we discuss the potential use of such drugs to improve anti-aging therapy.

The Eosinophil Changes, Efficacy and Safety of Pembrolizumab in Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma Patients with an Older Age and a Poor Performance Status

Background

To evaluate the eosinophil changes, efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab treatment in advanced urothelial carcinoma patients of older age and those with a poor performance status (PS).

Materials and Methods

Consecutive patients with advanced UC who received pembrolizumab after the failure of platinum-based chemotherapy between January 2018 and June 2021 were retrospectively examined.

Results

105 patients (median age, 72 years), 71.4% of whom were men, were enrolled. Patients of ≥75 years of age were considered to be older patients (n=40), and patients with PS ≥2 were considered to have a poor PS (n=10). The objective response and disease control rates were 42.5% and 52.5%, respectively, in older patients and 0% and 10.0%, respectively, in patients with a poor PS. Overall survival (OS) in the older and younger groups did not differ to a statistically significant extent. However, a poor PS was significantly associated with poor survival. Safety analyses demonstrated no significant difference in the occurrence of any immune-related adverse events (irAEs), including grade ≥3, between the older and younger groups. However, a poor PS was significantly associated with the low occurrence of any irAEs. The change of the eosinophil count, the increase of the relative eosinophil count (REC) and the decrease of the neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio (NER) did not differ to a statistically significant extent between the older and younger groups, but showed significant differences between the poor and good PS (PS 0–1) groups.

Conclusion

Pembrolizumab for advanced UC demonstrated similar changes in the eosinophil count, efficacy and toxicity in both older and younger patients. In patients with a poor PS, although toxicity was significantly lower, survival was significantly worse, and neither an increase in REC nor a decrease in NER were observed, but these values showed significant changes in patients with a good PS.

The Predictive Value of Three Variables in Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated with Immune-Based Combination Therapies in Randomized Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Sex, age, and International Metastatic Renal-Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) prognostic risk may influence the immune response. Nonetheless, the correlation between these factors and the survival benefits of immune-based combination therapies in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) is controversial and undefined. As a result, the purpose of this research is to evaluate the potential differences of immune-based combination therapies on survival benefits from mRCC subgroups.

Methods

PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and http://www.clinicaltrials.gov were searched from inception to March 17, 2022. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with mRCC treated by immune-based combinations vs. contemporary first-line therapies were included.

Results

Five RCTs with a total of 4206 subjects were included. An OS and PFS benefit of immune-based combinations were found for patients of different sex, age, and IMDC intermediate/poor risk. No obvious difference in relative PFS benefit from immune-based combinations over the control group was found in patients of different genders (P=0.71, I² = 0%), ages (P=0.55, I² = 0%), or IMDC prognostic risks (P=0.38, I² = 0%). However, the difference in OS benefit was significant regarding age (P=0.009, I² = 85.5%) and IMDC prognostic risk (P=0.004, I² = 82.2%).

Conclusions

This meta-analysis found that immune-based combination therapies should not be restricted to certain patients with mRCC in gender categories. However, age and IMDC prognostic risk of mRCC patients are associated with different outcomes of OS and thus help identify those patients most probably to benefit from immune-based combination therapies.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: The Unexplored Landscape of Geriatric Oncology

Cancer is classically considered a disease of aging, with over half of all new cancer diagnoses occurring in patients over the age of 65 years. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer treatment, yet the participation of older adults with cancer in ICI trials has been suboptimal, particularly at the extremes of age. Despite significant improvement in treatment response and an improved toxicity profile when compared with conventional cytotoxic chemotherapies, many cancers develop resistance to ICIs, and these drugs are not free of toxicities. This becomes particularly important in the setting of older adults with cancer, who are generally frailer and harbor more comorbidities than do their younger counterparts. Immunosenescence, a concept involving age-related changes in immune function, may also play a role in differential responses to ICI treatment in older patients. Data on ICI treatment response in older adult with cancers remains inconclusive, with multiple studies revealing conflicting results. The molecular mechanisms underlying response to ICIs in older cancer patients are poorly understood, and predictors of response that can delineate responders from non-responders remain to be elucidated. In this review, we explore the unique geriatric oncology population by analyzing existing retrospective datasets, and we also sought to highlight potential cellular, inflammatory, and molecular changes associated with aging as potential biomarkers for response to ICIs.

Lack of Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Cancer Patients Older Than 75?

This research was designed to compare the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in cancer patients among different age groups. Electronic databases were searched to identify relevant trials. Randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) with ICIs and RCTs that conducted subgroup analysis of overall survival (OS) and/or progression-free survival (PFS) based on age were included. Summary hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were available. Totally, 35,777 individuals from 59 RCTs were recruited. ICIs can ameliorate OS and PFS of cancer patients in groups of below 65 year and 65-75 years. Conversely, patients in group of 75 years or above failed to acquire benefit from ICIs for both OS (HR=0.99, 95% CI: 0.91-1.09, P =0.8767) and PFS (HR=0.96, 95% CI: 0.82-1.11, P =0.5694). Subgroup analysis was performed based on class of ICIs, type of ICIs, type of cancer, line of treatment, blind method, and type of nonsmall-cell lung cancer. In all subgroups, OS and PFS were not significantly improved in patients 75 years or above. Cancer patients older than 75 years failed to acquire remarkable benefit from ICIs for both OS and PFS.

Disparities in Representation of Women, Older Adults, and Racial/Ethnic Minorities in Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Trials

PURPOSE

We aim to describe reporting and representation of minority patient populations in immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) clinical trials and assess predictors of enrollment disparity.

METHODS

Trial-level data were acquired from eligible phase II and III trials. Population-based estimates were acquired from the SEER 18 and Global Burden of Disease incidence databases. Trials reporting race, age, and sex were summarized using descriptive statistics. Enrollment-incidence ratio (EIR) was used to assess representation of subgroups. Average annual percentage change (AAPC) in EIR was calculated using Joinpoint Regression Analysis. Trial-level characteristics associated with EIR were assessed using multivariable linear regression.

RESULTS

A total of 107 trials with 48,095 patients were identified. Participation of Black, White, Asian, Native American, Pacific Islander, and Hispanic participants was reported in 65 (61%), 77 (72%), 68 (64%), 40 (37%,) and 24 trials (22%), respectively. Subgroup analyses of clinical outcomes by race, age, and sex were reported in 17 (22%), 62 (78%), and 57 (57%) trials, respectively. Women (trial proportion [TP]: 32%; EIR: 0.90 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.84-0.96]), patients aged ≥65 years (TP: 42%; EIR: 0.78 [95% CI: 0.72-0.84]), Black participants (TP: 1.9%; EIR: 0.17 [95% CI: 0.13-0.22]) and Hispanics (TP: 5.9%; EIR: 0.67 [95% CI: 0.53-0.82]) were underrepresented. Representation of Black patients decreased significantly from 2009 to 2020 (AAPC: -23.13). Black participants were significantly underrepresented in phase III trials (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

The reporting of participation by racial or ethnic subgroup categories is inadequate. Women, older adults, as well as Black and Hispanic participants are significantly underrepresented in ICI clinical trials.

Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Positivity and Factors Associated with Poor Prognosis in Patients with Gastric Cancer: An Umbrella Meta-Analysis

Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most common malignancies throughout the world with late diagnosis and poor prognosis. The expression of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) in GC is attributed to immune evasion and tumor progression. PD-L1 positivity has both predictive and prognostic biomarker potential. Aiming to summarize a large amount of research and to provide a definitive conclusion to the conflicting results on the prognostic significance of PD-L1 expression in GC, we performed an umbrella review based on existing meta-analyses which were published recently (2016-2021) and indexed in the PubMed database. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline was used in August 2021 to screen articles, and data extraction with quality assessment was performed on the selected meta-analyses. Review Manager (RevMan) 5.3 software was used to analyze the HR and OR with a 95% confidence interval (CI) among PD-L1 positive GC patients. We also assessed the between-study heterogeneity (I ²). Forest and Funnel plots were obtained, and a P-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. A total of 567 articles were screened, and we selected three meta-analyses with a total of 40 studies conducted over a period of 14 years. In our umbrella review, a total of 8,419 GC patients with an average PD-L1 positivity of 39% were analyzed. We found that PD-L1 positivity in GC patients is associated with poor prognosis (pooled HR =1.44, 95% CI: 1.24-1.68, P<0.00001) having higher mortality reducing the chances of overall survival (OS). However, there are no significant differences in PD-L1 expression among different lymph node (LN) metastases (OR=1.31, 95% CI: 0.98-1.74, P=0.07) and tumor, node, and metastasis (TNM) stages (OR=1.13, 95% CI: 0.80-1.58, P=0.50). Early identification of PD-L1 expression may help tailor cost-effective and targeted immunotherapy among GC patients. More research is needed to further understand how PD-L1 affects LN metastasis and tumor invasion.

Considerations and Challenges in the Management of the Older Patients with Gastric Cancer

Gastric cancer is one of the commonest malignancies with high rates of mortality worldwide. Older patients represent a substantial proportion of cases with this diagnosis. However, there are very few 'elderly-specific' trials in this setting. In addition, the inclusion rate of such patients in randomised clinical trials is poor, presumably due to concerns about increased toxicity, co-existing comorbidities and impaired performance status. Therapeutic strategies for this patient group are therefore mostly based on retrospective subgroup analysis of randomised clinical trials. Review of currently available evidence suggests that older gastric cancer patients who are fit for trial inclusion may benefit from surgical intervention and peri-operative systemic chemotherapy strategies. For patients with metastatic disease, management has been revolutionized by the use of anti-HER2 directed therapies as well as immune checkpoint inhibitors with or without chemotherapy. Early data suggest that fit older patients may also benefit from these therapeutic interventions. However, once again there may be limitations in extrapolating these data to everyday clinical practice with older patients being less likely to have a good performance status and an intact immune system. Therefore, determining the functional age and not just the chronological age of a patient prior to initiating therapy becomes very important. The functional decline including reduced organ function that may occur in older patients makes the integration of some form of geriatric assessment in routine clinical practice very relevant.

NAFLD-driven HCC: Safety and efficacy of current and emerging treatment options

In light of a global rise in obesity and type 2 diabetes, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) represent an increasingly important underlying aetiology of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). HCCs arising from lipotoxicity-mediated chronic inflammation are characterised by several unique features: in contrast to virally driven HCC, up to 50% of NAFLD-HCC occurs in patients without cirrhosis and annual HCC incidence is comparatively low, complicating current surveillance strategies. On average, patients are older and are more frequently diagnosed at an advanced stage. While locoregional treatments are probably equally effective regardless of HCC aetiology, the picture is less clear for systemic therapy. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors are probably equally effective, while there have been initial signals that immune checkpoint inhibitors may be less effective in NAFLD-HCC than in viral HCC. Current international clinical practice guidelines for HCC do not consider aetiology, as there are insufficient data to draw specific conclusions or to recommend aetiology-specific modifications to the current management of patients with HCC. However, in light of the growing relevance of NAFLD-HCC, future clinical trials should assess whether HCC aetiology - and NAFLD/NASH in particular - influence the safety and efficacy of a given treatment.

Impact of Patient Age on Clinical Efficacy and Toxicity of Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy

The addition of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) to the therapeutic armamentarium for solid malignancies has resulted in unprecedented improvements in patient outcomes in many cancers. The landscape of ICIs continues to evolve with novel approaches such as dual immune checkpoint blockade and combination therapies with other anticancer agents including cytotoxic chemotherapies and/or antiangiogenics. However, there is significant heterogeneity seen in antitumor responses, with certain patients deriving durable benefit, others experiencing initial benefit followed by acquired resistance necessitating change in therapy, and still others who are primarily refractory to ICIs. While generally better tolerated than traditional cytotoxic chemotherapy, ICIs are associated with unique toxicities, termed immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which can be severe or even lethal. As a disease of aging, older individuals make up a large proportion of patients diagnosed with cancer, yet this population is often underrepresented in clinical trials. Because ICIs indirectly target malignant cells through T cell activation, it has been hypothesized that age-related changes to the immune system may impact the efficacy and toxicity of these drugs. In this review, we discuss differences in the clinical efficacy and toxicity of ICIs in patients at the extremes of age.

Advanced oesophago-gastric adenocarcinoma in older patients in the era of immunotherapy. A review of the literature

Gastric (G) and gastro-esophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinomas are of the most common and deadly cancers worldwide and affect mainly patients over 70 years at diagnosis. Older age has been associated in gastric cancers with distal tumour location, well-differentiated adenocarcinoma and microsatellite instability and is not identified itself as an independent prognostic factor. As immune checkpoint inhibitors recently changed the landmark of advanced G and GEJ adenocarcinomas treatment, we decided to perform a literature review to define the evidence-level of clinical data in older patients. This work underlined the lasting low -inclusion rate of older patients and -implementation rate of frailty screening tools in clinical trials in G/GEJ carcinomas. In the first-line metastatic setting, two prospective randomized phase III studies have specifically assessed the efficacy of chemotherapy in older patients with HER2-negative gastric cancers, demonstrating the feasibility of reduced dose oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy regimen in this population. Only few data are available in HER2-positive tumors, or in the second-line setting. Furthermore, no specific trial with immune checkpoint inhibitors was performed in older frail patients whereas their benefit/adverse events ratio make them attractive candidates in this patient's population. We conclude that older fit patients can be treated in the same way as younger ones and included in clinical trials. Improving the outcome of older frail patients should be the oncology community next focus by implementing targeted interventions before initiating cancer therapy and designing specific clinical trials. Frailty screening tools and geriatric data collection have to be implemented in routine-practice and clinical trials.

PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors during late stages of life: an ad-hoc analysis from a large multicenter cohort

BACKGROUND

The favourable safety profile and the increasing confidence with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) might have boosted their prescription in frail patients with short life expectancies, who usually are not treated with standard chemotherapy.

METHODS

The present analysis aims to describe clinicians' attitudes towards ICIs administration during late stages of life within a multicenter cohort of advanced cancer patients treated with single agent PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors in Italy.

RESULTS

Overall, 1149 patients with advanced cancer who received single agent PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors were screened. The final study population consisted of 567 deceased patients. 166 patients (29.3%) had received ICIs within 30 days of death; among them there was a significantly higher proportion of patients with ECOG-PS ≥ 2 (28.3% vs 11.5%, p < 0.0001) and with a higher burden of disease (69.3% vs 59.4%, p = 0.0266). In total, 35 patients (6.2%) started ICIs within 30 days of death; among them there was a higher proportion of patients with ECOG-PS ≥ 2 (45.7% vs 14.5%, p < 0.0001) and with a higher burden of disease (82.9% vs 60.9%, p = 0.0266). Primary tumors were significantly different across subgroups (p = 0.0172), with a higher prevalence of NSCLC patients (80% vs 60.9%) among those who started ICIs within 30 days of death. Lastly, 123 patients (21.7%) started ICIs within 3 months of death. Similarly, within this subgroup there was a higher proportion of patients with ECOG-PS ≥ 2 (29.3% vs 12.8%, p < 0.0001), with a higher burden of disease (74.0% vs 59.0%, p = 0.0025) and with NSCLC (74.0% vs 58.8%, p = 0.0236).

CONCLUSION

Our results confirmed a trend toward an increasing ICIs prescription in frail patients, during the late stages of life. Caution should be exercised when evaluating an ICI treatment for patients with a poor PS and a high burden of disease.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Associated Pneumonitis in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Current Understanding in Characteristics, Diagnosis, and Management

Immunotherapy that includes programmed cell death-1 (PD-1), programmed cell death- ligand 1 (PD-L1) and cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) inhibitors has revolutionized the therapeutic strategy in multiple malignancies. Although it has achieved significant breakthrough in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients, immune-related adverse events (irAEs) including checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis (CIP), are widely reported. As the particularly worrisome and potentially lethal form of irAEs, CIP should be attached more importance. Especially in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, the features of CIP may be more complicated on account of the overlapping respiratory signs compromised by primary tumor following immunotherapy. Herein, we included the previous relevant reports and comprehensively summarized the characteristics, diagnosis, and management of CIP. We also discussed the future direction of optimal steroid therapeutic schedule for patients with CIP in NSCLC based on the current evidence.

Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in gastric cancer: a network meta-analysis of well-designed randomized controlled trials

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) that inhibit the programmed death 1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) interactions have shown promising prospects as treatment options for advanced gastric cancer (AGC). This manuscript analyzed well designed clinical trials to evaluate the efficacy and safety of immunotherapy in AGC.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Medline were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of AGC treatments that were published before April 2020. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were evaluated to determine the efficacy and safety of ICIs. Network meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model under the Bayesian framework. The ability of each treatment was ranked using the surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) curve.

Results

Our analysis included five studies having seven immunotherapy regimens and 1,730 patients. The network meta-analysis showed that nivolumab 1 mg/kg every 3 weeks plus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks (88.369%) was the regimen most likely to improve PFS. Nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks (84.563%) and nivolumab 1 mg/kg every 3 weeks plus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks (84.556%) were similarly best for OS outcome with excellent tolerance. The regimen of avelumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks (91.167%) had the lowest TRAEs. All immunotherapies had similar response rates.

Conclusions

We recommend nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks or nivolumab 1 mg/kg every 3 weeks plus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks as the preferred regimen due to their high efficacies.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Patients Aged ≥ 75 Years with Advanced Cancer in First- and Second-Line Settings: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The impact of aging on the effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) remains controversial, and little is known on the subject in adults aged ≥ 75 years.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this comprehensive meta-analysis was to assess the efficacy of ICIs in patients aged ≥ 75 years.

METHODS

We performed a meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials concerning ICIs (as monotherapy or in combination) versus standard therapy in patients with advanced solid tumors between January 2010 and January 2020. We compared overall survival between older (aged ≥ 75 years) and younger (< 75 years) patients. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were collected and pooled. The secondary endpoint focused on the impact of the use of ICIs in first- and second-line settings.

RESULTS

In total, 15 phase III studies evaluating anti-programmed cell death 1 (anti-PD-1) (nivolumab or pembrolizumab), anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 (anti-PD-L1) (atezolizumab or avelumab), or anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (anti-CTLA-4) (ipilimumab) therapies were included. Enrolled patients had non-small-cell lung cancer, renal cell carcinoma, melanoma, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, or gastric cancer. Eight studies assessed treatment in the first-line setting and seven in the second-line setting. The median age was 64 years, with 906 patients aged ≥ 75 years (552 in first line, 354 in second line) and 8741 were aged < 75 years (4992 in first line, 3749 in second line). In the first-line setting, HRs for death were 0.78 (95% CI 0.61-0.99) in patients aged ≥ 75 years versus 0.84 (95% CI 0.71-1.00) in those aged < 75 years. In the second-line setting, HRs for death were 1.02 (95% CI 0.77-1.36) in patients aged ≥ 75 years versus 0.68 (95% CI 0.61-0.75) in those aged < 75 years, with a statistically significant difference observed between subgroups (p = 0.009 for interaction).

CONCLUSIONS

ICIs appear to be effective in patients aged ≥ 75 years. However, the survival benefit is mainly observed in first-line treatment and remains unclear in the second-line setting.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor efficacy and safety in older non-small cell lung cancer patients

OBJECTIVES

Immune checkpoint inhibitors offer longer survival than chemotherapy in several clinical trials for advanced non-small cell lung cancer. In subset analyses of clinical trials, immune checkpoint inhibitors extended survival in patients aged ≥65 years, but the effects in patients aged ≥75 years are controversial. We performed multicenter, collaborative and retrospective analyses of immune checkpoint inhibitor efficacy and safety in non-small cell lung cancer patients aged ≥75 years.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied 434 advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients who received immune checkpoint inhibitors from December 2015 to December 2017, and retrospectively applied the Geriatric (G) 8 screening tool with medical records.

RESULTS

Of the 434 patients who received immune checkpoint inhibitors, 100 were aged ≥75 years. Five patients with performance status 3 were omitted from the final analysis. Immune checkpoint inhibitors were given as a first-line treatment to 20 patients. The objective response rates, median progression-free survival rates and median survival times were 35.0%, 6.1 months and 10.7 months for first-line treatment, and 20.0%, 2.9 months and 14.7 months for second- or later-line treatments, respectively. The median modified G8 score was 11.0. The median survival time was longer in the high modified G8 (≥12.0) group than in the low modified G8 (≤11.0) group (18.7 vs. 8.7 months; P = 0.02). Likewise, the median survival time was 15.5 months (performance status 0-1) vs. 3.2 months (performance status 2) (P < 0.01). The grade ≥ 2 immune-related adverse events incidence was 36.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, immune checkpoint inhibitors were effective and tolerable for patients aged ≥75 years. The modified G8 screening tool and performance status were associated with the outcome of older non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

The optimal immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus chemotherapy (CT) have strikingly expanded the therapeutic landscape for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but little is known about which is superior. We performed a meta-analysis that compared the efficacy and safety of PD-1 inhibitor + CT with PD-L1 inhibitor + CT.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and major international scientific meetings were searched for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and the indirect analysis was performed for PD-1 + CT vs PD-L1 + CT. The outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR) and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs).

RESULTS

8 phase III RCTs with 4253 patients comparing PD-1/PD-L1 + CT in NSCLC were included. The PD-1 + CT led to notably longer OS most in low/negative expression of PD-L1 for NSCLC patients compared with PD-L1 + CT. In terms of Grade 3-5 TRAEs, the results showed that PD-1 + CT and PD-L1 + CT exclusively increased the risk of adverse incidence than CT alone, especially for PD-L1 + CT (p < 0.00001). For subgroups including female, young patients, patients with nonsmoker, and EGFR/ALK wild-type, PD-1 + CT was associated with prolonged OS (p < 0.05). Meanwhile, for no liver metastasis of NSCLC patients, we found obviously OS advantage for patients treated with PD-1 + CT compared to PD-L1 + CT.

CONCLUSIONS

ICIs + CT seemed to be more effective first-line regimen and PD-1 + CT could be recommended as the first-rank therapy for advanced NSCLC patients with low/negative expression of PD-L1. However, we should be particularly vigilant about the occurrence of the Grade 3-5 TRAEs.

Impact of Age on the Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Based Combination Therapy for Non-small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Despite the acknowledged benefits of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based combination therapy (either with other checkpoint inhibitors, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, or radiotherapy), little is known about the impact of age on the efficacy of ICI -based combination therapy in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the differences in the benefits of ICI-based combination therapy for NSCLC by age (cut-off age, 65 years). Methods: We systematically searched randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of ICI plus other therapies including other ICIs, chemotherapies, targeted therapies, or radiotherapies, in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases with available hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for death and disease progression according to patient age. The search deadline was May 25, 2020. First, we calculated the pooled HRs of younger and older patients based on the HRs from each trial. Second, we assessed the pooled ratio of HRs reported in older patients to the HRs reported in younger patients for progression or death by the random-effects model. An estimated pooled HR ratio was lower than 1 indicating a better effect in older patients and higher than 1 indicating a better effect in younger patients. Results: A total of 10 eligible RCTs were included in our meta-analysis. The pooled HR for overall survival (OS) comparing ICI combined with other therapies to non-ICI regimens was 0.67 (95%CI 0.58-0.78) for younger patients and 0.79 (95%CI 0.70-0.90) for older patients. The pooled HRs ratio for OS reported in older patients compared to younger patients was 1.16 (95%CI 0.99-1.34), indicating no statistically significant difference between younger and older patients. Consistent with the findings related to OS, the analysis also demonstrated that ICI-based immunotherapy could significantly prolong progression-free survival (PFS) in younger and older patients (HR = 0.55; 95% CI 0.47-0.66, and HR = 0.64; 95% CI 0.57-0.71). The same results could also be observed in the pooled HRs ratio for PFS (HR = 1.15, 95%CI 0.91-1.46) indicating comparable efficacy of ICI-based combination therapy in younger and older patients with NSCLC. Conclusion: ICI-based combination therapy vs. non-ICI treatment had comparable efficacy in younger and older NSCLC patients with a cut-off age of 65 years.