Molecularly matched therapy in the context of sensitivity, resistance, and safety; patient outcomes in end-stage cancer - the MetAction study

Multidisciplinary treatment of a patient with severe immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced colitis: A case report

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are a new class of antitumor drugs that have been approved to treat a variety of malignant tumors. However, the occurrence of immune related adverse events (irAEs) has become an important reason for terminating treatment. ICIs sometimes lead to diarrhea and colitis, with severe enterocolitis potentially causing the hemorrhage of the lower gastrointestinal tract and colonic perforation. ICI-associated colitis is primarily treated with glucorticosteroids and/or agents targeting tumor necrosis factor-α. Here, we describe a case of severe ICI-associated colitis due to anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) (durvalumab) treatment for small cell lung cancer with liver metastasis. The patient exhibited a poor response to rescuable therapy, and eventually received a laparoscopic subtotal colectomy and ileostomy. The data presented here will contribute to optimizing current treatment strategies for patients with severe ICI-associated colitis.

CASE SUMMARY

A 71-year-old man was admitted for a second course of anti-PD-L1 + IP (durvalumab + irinotecan + cisplatin) treatment to manage lung cancer with liver metastasis, diagnosed 1 mo previously. Four days after the second dose, the patient developed abdominal pain and bloody diarrhea. Due to the anti-PD-L1 medication history and colonoscopy findings of the patient, he was diagnosed with a colitis associated with ICI treatment. After treatment with sufficient glucocorticoids and two courses of infliximab, the patient developed severe lower gastrointestinal bleeding. After adequate assessment, the patient was treated by laparoscopic surgery, and was discharged in stable condition.

CONCLUSION

The early screening and hierarchical management of irAEs need the joint participation of a multidisciplinary team. For ICI-related colitis with ineffective medical treatment, timely surgical intervention could prevent the death of patients.

How precision medicine changes medical epistemology: A formative case from Norway

RATIONALE AND AIMS

Precision medicine (PM) raises a key question: How do we know what works when the number of people with a health problem becomes small or one (n = 1)? We here present a formative case from Norway. The Norwegian Board of Health Supervision was faced with a cancer patient, who had improved after treatment with a drug in the private health sector but was refused continued treatment in the public health service due to lack of clinical trial evidence. The Board overturned this decision, arguing that the drug had been unambiguously documented to work in the individual case. We aim to provide an in-depth analysis of this case and The Board's decision and thereby to illustrate and elucidate key epistemological and ethical issues and developments in PM.

METHOD

We provide our analysis and discussion using tools of critical thinking and concepts from philosophy of science and medicine, such as uncertainty, evidence, forms of inference and causation. We also examine the case in light of the history of evidence-based medicine (EBM).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The case reflects an epistemological shift in medicine where PM puts greater emphasis on evidence that arises in individual patients after the treatment is provided over pre-existing population-based evidence. PM may rely more heavily on abduction to decide what works and qualitative, rather than quantitative judgements. The case also illustrates a possible shift in the concept of causation from regularity accounts to mechanistic and process accounts. We discuss the ethical implications of a shift from more 'traditional' to 'personalised EBM'.

CONCLUSION

A framework that is more based on abductions and evidence arising in the individual case has problems in creating quantifiable, reliable and generalisable evidence, and in promoting transparency and accountability. PM currently lacks clear criteria for deciding what works in an individual, posing ethical challenges.

Cost-effectiveness of molecularly matched off-label therapies for end-stage cancer - the MetAction precision medicine study

BACKGROUND

Precision cancer medicine (PCM), frequently used for the expensive and often modestly efficacious off-label treatment with medications matched to the tumour genome of end-stage cancer, challenges healthcare resources. We compared the health effects, costs and cost-effectiveness of our MetAction PCM study with corresponding data from comparator populations given best supportive care (BSC) in two external randomised controlled trials.

METHODS

We designed three partitioned survival models to evaluate the healthcare costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) as the main outcomes. Cost-effectiveness was calculated as the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of PCM relative to BSC with an annual willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of EUR 56,384 (NOK 605,000). One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses addressed uncertainty.

RESULTS

We estimated total healthcare costs (relating to next-generation sequencing (NGS) equipment and personnel wages, molecularly matched medications to the patients with an actionable tumour target and follow-up of the responding patients) and the health outcomes for the MetAction patients versus costs (relating to estimated hospital admission) and outcomes for the BSC cases. The ICERs for incremental QALYs were twice or more as high as the WTP threshold and relatively insensitive to cost decrease of the NGS procedures, while reduction of medication prices would contribute significantly towards a cost-effective PCM strategy.

CONCLUSIONS

The models suggested that the high ICERs of PCM were driven by costs of the NGS diagnostics and molecularly matched medications, with a likelihood for the strategy to be cost-effective defying WTP constraints. Reducing drug expenses to half the list price would likely result in an ICER at the WTP threshold. This can be an incentive for a public-private partnership for sharing drug costs in PCM, exemplified by ongoing European initiatives.

CLINICALTRIALS.GOV, IDENTIFIER

NCT02142036.

Improving public cancer care by implementing precision medicine in Norway: IMPRESS-Norway

Background

Matching treatment based on tumour molecular characteristics has revolutionized the treatment of some cancers and has given hope to many patients. Although personalized cancer care is an old concept, renewed attention has arisen due to recent advancements in cancer diagnostics including access to high-throughput sequencing of tumour tissue. Targeted therapies interfering with cancer specific pathways have been developed and approved for subgroups of patients. These drugs might just as well be efficient in other diagnostic subgroups, not investigated in pharma-led clinical studies, but their potential use on new indications is never explored due to limited number of patients.

Methods

In this national, investigator-initiated, prospective, open-label, non-randomized combined basket- and umbrella-trial, patients are enrolled in multiple parallel cohorts. Each cohort is defined by the patient’s tumour type, molecular profile of the tumour, and study drug. Treatment outcome in each cohort is monitored by using a Simon two-stage-like ‘admissible’ monitoring plan to identify evidence of clinical activity.

All drugs available in IMPRESS-Norway have regulatory approval and are funded by pharmaceutical companies. Molecular diagnostics are funded by the public health care system.

Discussion

Precision oncology means to stratify treatment based on specific patient characteristics and the molecular profile of the tumor. Use of targeted drugs is currently restricted to specific biomarker-defined subgroups of patients according to their market authorization. However, other cancer patients might also benefit of treatment with these drugs if the same biomarker is present. The emerging technologies in molecular diagnostics are now being implemented in Norway and it is publicly reimbursed, thus more cancer patients will have a more comprehensive genomic profiling of their tumour. Patients with actionable genomic alterations in their tumour may have the possibility to try precision cancer drugs through IMPRESS-Norway, if standard treatment is no longer an option, and the drugs are available in the study. This might benefit some patients. In addition, it is a good example of a public–private collaboration to establish a national infrastructure for precision oncology.

Trial registrations EudraCT: 2020-004414-35, registered 02/19/2021; ClinicalTrial.gov: NCT04817956, registered 03/26/2021.

ALK Inhibitors in Patients With ALK Fusion-Positive GI Cancers: An International Data Set and a Molecular Case Series

In GI cancers, anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangements are extremely less frequent than in non–small-cell lung cancer but may be important to offer personalized strategies of treatment in selected patients. Data about the activity and efficacy of ALK inhibitors (ALKi) in GI cancers are scarce.

ALK inhibitors are active in patients with ALK fusion–positive GI cancers.

Genomic landscape of treatment refractory metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is a complex and heterogeneous disease with few standard and targeted treatment options. Next-generation sequencing of tumor tissue was performed to identify cancer driver mutations to discover possible personalized treatment options, as targeted treatment possibilities are limited for this patient population. Results of genomic sequencing in patients with treatment-refractory mCRC are described in this retrospective analysis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Clinico-pathological characteristics and genomic sequence results of consecutive patients with refractory mCRC, referred to the Experimental Cancer Therapy Unit (ECTU) at Department of Oncology, Herlev & Gentofte Hospital in the period from 1 October 2015 to 14 December 2018 were reviewed in this retrospective analysis. Tumor tissue from the patients was analyzed by next-generation sequencing using the Oncomine Comprehensive primer panel to detect actionable variants of cancer driver mutations and microsatellite instability status. From August 2018 tumor mutational burden was also analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 80 patients with treatment-refractory mCRC and in a fairly good performance were referred to the ECTU during this period. Genomic sequencing of tumor tissue was performed for all 80 patients and a cancer driver mutation was identified in 90% (n = 72) of the patients. A total of 31.3% (n = 25) of the patients received therapy either as targetable therapy outside an available trial (n = 2), FDA approved therapy (n = 2), or treatment in phase 1 or 2 trials, independent of the genomic signature 26.3% (n = 21).

CONCLUSION

Most mCRC patients refractory to standard anti-neoplastic therapies, presented with a cancer driver mutation, however, only a few of these mutations gave rise to matched therapies as only 2.5% of the patients from this period received targeted therapy.

Feasibility and clinical impact of routine molecular testing of gastrointestinal cancers at a tertiary centre with a multi-gene, tumor-agnostic, next generation sequencing panel

BACKGROUND

High-throughput sequencing technologies are increasingly used in research but limited data are available on the feasibility and value of these when routinely adopted in clinical practice.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We analyzed all consecutive cancer patients for whom genomic testing by a 48-gene next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel (Truseq Amplicon Cancer Panel, Illumina) was requested as part of standard care in one of the largest Belgian cancer networks between 2014 and 2019. Feasibility of NGS was assessed in all study patients, while the impact of NGS on the decision making was analyzed in the group of gastrointestinal cancer patients.

RESULTS

Tumor samples from 1064 patients with varying tumor types were tested, the number of NGS requests increasing over time (p < .0001). Success rate and median turnaround time were 91.4% and 12.5 days, respectively, both significantly decreasing over time (p ≤ .0002). Non-surgical sampling procedure (OR 7.97, p < .0001), tissue from metastatic site (OR 2.35, p = .0006) and more recent year of testing (OR 1.79, p = .0258) were independently associated with NGS failure. Excluding well-known actionable or clinically relevant mutations which are recommended by international guidelines and commonly tested by targeted sequencing, 57/279 (20.4%) assessable gastrointestinal cancer patients were found to have tumors harboring at least one actionable altered gene according to the OncoKB database. NGS results, however, had a direct impact on management decisions by the treating physician in only 3 cases (1.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings confirm that NGS is feasible in the clinical setting with acceptably low failure rates and rapid turnaround time. In gastrointestinal cancers, however, NGS-based multiple-gene testing adds very little to standard targeted sequencing, and in routine practice the clinical impact of NGS panels including genes which are not routinely recommended by international guidelines remains limited.