1
|
Helland Å, Steinskog ESS, Blix ES, Flobak Å, Brabrand S, Puco K, Niehusmann P, Meltzer S, Oppedal IA, Haug Å, Torkildsen CF, Randen U, Gilje B, Lønning PE, Gjertsen BT, Hovland R, Russnes HG, Fagereng GL, Smeland S, Tasken K. Hever kvaliteten på behandling av kreft. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 2024; 144:23-0740. [PMID: 38258713 DOI: 10.4045/tidsskr.23.0740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
|
2
|
Andresen NK, Røssevold AH, Quaghebeur C, Gilje B, Boge B, Gombos A, Falk RS, Mathiesen RR, Julsrud L, Garred Ø, Russnes HG, Lereim RR, Chauhan SK, Lingjærde OC, Dunn C, Naume B, Kyte JA. Ipilimumab and nivolumab combined with anthracycline-based chemotherapy in metastatic hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: a randomized phase 2b trial. J Immunother Cancer 2024; 12:e007990. [PMID: 38242720 PMCID: PMC10806573 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2023-007990] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/21/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown minimal clinical activity in hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer (HR+mBC). Doxorubicin and low-dose cyclophosphamide are reported to induce immune responses and counter regulatory T cells (Tregs). Here, we report the efficacy and safety of combined programmed cell death protein-1/cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 blockade concomitant with or after immunomodulatory chemotherapy for HR+mBC. METHODS Patients with HR+mBC starting first-/second- line chemotherapy (chemo) were randomized 2:3 to chemotherapy (pegylated liposomal doxorubicin 20 mg/m2 every second week plus cyclophosphamide 50 mg by mouth/day in every other 2-week cycle) with or without concomitant ipilimumab (ipi; 1 mg/kg every sixth week) and nivolumab (nivo; 240 mg every second week). Patients in the chemo-only arm were offered cross-over to ipi/nivo without chemotherapy. Co-primary endpoints were safety in all patients starting therapy and progression-free survival (PFS) in the per-protocol (PP) population, defined as all patients evaluated for response and receiving at least two treatment cycles. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate, clinical benefit rate, Treg changes during therapy and assessment of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), mutational burden and immune gene signatures as biomarkers. RESULTS Eighty-two patients were randomized and received immune-chemo (N=49) or chemo-only (N=33), 16 patients continued to the ipi/nivo-only cross-over arm. Median follow-up was 41.4 months. Serious adverse events occurred in 63% in the immune-chemo arm, 39% in the chemo-only arm and 31% in the cross-over-arm. In the PP population (N=78) median PFS in the immune-chemo arm was 5.1 months, compared with 3.6 months in the chemo-only arm, with HR 0.94 (95% CI 0.59 to 1.51). Clinical benefit rates were 55% (26/47) and 48% (15/31) in the immune-chemo and chemo-only arms, respectively. In the cross-over-arm (ipi/nivo-only), objective responses were observed in 19% of patients (3/16) and clinical benefit in 25% (4/16). Treg levels in blood decreased after study chemotherapy. High-grade immune-related adverse events were associated with prolonged PFS. PD-L1 status and mutational burden were not associated with ipi/nivo benefit, whereas a numerical PFS advantage was observed for patients with a high Treg gene signature in tumor. CONCLUSION The addition of ipi/nivo to chemotherapy increased toxicity without improving efficacy. Ipi/nivo administered sequentially to chemotherapy was tolerable and induced clinical responses. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03409198.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikolai Kragøe Andresen
- Department of Clinical Cancer Research and Department of Cancer Immunology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Andreas Hagen Røssevold
- Department of Clinical Cancer Research and Department of Cancer Immunology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Claire Quaghebeur
- Department of Oncology, CHU UCL Namur - Site Sainte-Elisabeth, Namur, Belgium
| | - Bjørnar Gilje
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Beate Boge
- Center for Cancer Treatment, Sørlandet Hospital Kristiansand, Kristiansand, Norway
| | - Andrea Gombos
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet, Bruxelles, Belgium
| | - Ragnhild Sørum Falk
- Oslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Lars Julsrud
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Øystein Garred
- Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Hege G Russnes
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Pathology and Department of Cancer Genetics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ragnhild Reehorst Lereim
- Department of Cancer Immunology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Sudhir Kumar Chauhan
- Department of Cancer Immunology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ole Christian Lingjærde
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Center for Bioinformatics, Department of Informatics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Claire Dunn
- Department of Cancer Immunology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Bjørn Naume
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Jon Amund Kyte
- Department of Clinical Cancer Research and Department of Cancer Immunology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gjelberg HK, Helgeland L, Liseth K, Micci F, Sandnes M, Russnes HG, Reikvam H. Long-Smoldering T-prolymphocytic Leukemia: A Case Report and a Review of the Literature. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:10007-10018. [PMID: 37999147 PMCID: PMC10669936 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30110727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2023] [Revised: 11/10/2023] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 11/25/2023] Open
Abstract
T-prolymphocytic leukemia (T-PLL) is a rare malignancy of mature T-cells with distinct clinical, cytomorphological, and molecular genetic features. The disease typically presents at an advanced stage, with marked leukocytosis, B symptoms, hepatosplenomegaly, and bone marrow failure. It usually follows an aggressive course from presentation, and the prognosis is often considered dismal; the median overall survival is less than one year with conventional chemotherapy. This case report describes a patient with T-PLL who, after an unusually protracted inactive phase, ultimately progressed to a highly invasive, organ-involving disease. After initial treatments failed, a novel treatment approach resulted in a significant response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hilde K. Gjelberg
- Department of Pathology, Haukeland University Hospital, N-5021 Bergen, Norway; (H.K.G.); (L.H.)
| | - Lars Helgeland
- Department of Pathology, Haukeland University Hospital, N-5021 Bergen, Norway; (H.K.G.); (L.H.)
- Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, N-5021 Bergen, Norway
| | - Knut Liseth
- Department of Immunology and Transfusion Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, N-5021 Bergen, Norway;
| | - Francesca Micci
- Section for Cancer Cytogenetics, Institute of Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, N-0424 Oslo, Norway;
| | - Miriam Sandnes
- Department of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, N-5021 Bergen, Norway;
| | - Hege G. Russnes
- Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, N-0424 Oslo, Norway;
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, N-0424 Oslo, Norway
- Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, N-0424 Oslo, Norway
| | - Håkon Reikvam
- Department of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, N-5021 Bergen, Norway;
- Department of Medical Science, University of Bergen, N-5021 Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Stashko C, Hayward MK, Northey JJ, Pearson N, Ironside AJ, Lakins JN, Oria R, Goyette MA, Mayo L, Russnes HG, Hwang ES, Kutys ML, Polyak K, Weaver VM. A convolutional neural network STIFMap reveals associations between stromal stiffness and EMT in breast cancer. Nat Commun 2023; 14:3561. [PMID: 37322009 PMCID: PMC10272194 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-39085-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2022] [Accepted: 05/26/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Intratumor heterogeneity associates with poor patient outcome. Stromal stiffening also accompanies cancer. Whether cancers demonstrate stiffness heterogeneity, and if this is linked to tumor cell heterogeneity remains unclear. We developed a method to measure the stiffness heterogeneity in human breast tumors that quantifies the stromal stiffness each cell experiences and permits visual registration with biomarkers of tumor progression. We present Spatially Transformed Inferential Force Map (STIFMap) which exploits computer vision to precisely automate atomic force microscopy (AFM) indentation combined with a trained convolutional neural network to predict stromal elasticity with micron-resolution using collagen morphological features and ground truth AFM data. We registered high-elasticity regions within human breast tumors colocalizing with markers of mechanical activation and an epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT). The findings highlight the utility of STIFMap to assess mechanical heterogeneity of human tumors across length scales from single cells to whole tissues and implicates stromal stiffness in tumor cell heterogeneity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Connor Stashko
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Center for Bioengineering and Tissue Regeneration, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Mary-Kate Hayward
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Center for Bioengineering and Tissue Regeneration, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jason J Northey
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Center for Bioengineering and Tissue Regeneration, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Alastair J Ironside
- Department of Pathology, Western General Hospital, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Johnathon N Lakins
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Center for Bioengineering and Tissue Regeneration, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Roger Oria
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Center for Bioengineering and Tissue Regeneration, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Marie-Anne Goyette
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lakyn Mayo
- Department of Cell and Tissue Biology, School of Dentistry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Hege G Russnes
- Department of Pathology and Department of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - E Shelley Hwang
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Matthew L Kutys
- Department of Cell and Tissue Biology, School of Dentistry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- UCSF Helen Diller Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Kornelia Polyak
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Valerie M Weaver
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
- Center for Bioengineering and Tissue Regeneration, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
- UCSF Helen Diller Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regeneration Medicine and Stem Cell Research, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Flobak Å, Skånland SS, Hovig E, Taskén K, Russnes HG. Functional precision cancer medicine: drug sensitivity screening enabled by cell culture models. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2022; 43:973-985. [PMID: 36163057 DOI: 10.1016/j.tips.2022.08.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2022] [Revised: 08/20/2022] [Accepted: 08/22/2022] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
Abstract
Functional precision medicine is a new, emerging area that can guide cancer treatment by capturing information from direct perturbations of tumor-derived, living cells, such as by drug sensitivity screening. Precision cancer medicine as currently implemented in clinical practice has been driven by genomics, and current molecular tumor boards rely extensively on genomic characterization to advise on therapeutic interventions. However, genomic biomarkers can only guide treatment decisions for a fraction of the patients. In this review we provide an overview of the current state of functional precision medicine, highlight advances for drug-sensitivity screening enabled by cell culture models, and discuss how artificial intelligence (AI) can be coupled to functional precision medicine to guide patient stratification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Åsmund Flobak
- The Cancer Clinic, St. Olav University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway; Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Sigrid S Skånland
- Department of Cancer Immunology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; K.G. Jebsen Centre for B Cell Malignancies, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Eivind Hovig
- Department of Tumor Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Department of Informatics, Centre for Bioinformatics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Kjetil Taskén
- Department of Cancer Immunology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; K.G. Jebsen Centre for B Cell Malignancies, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Hege G Russnes
- Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Department of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ree AH, Mælandsmo GM, Flatmark K, Russnes HG, Gómez Castañeda M, Aas E. Cost-effectiveness of molecularly matched off-label therapies for end-stage cancer - the MetAction precision medicine study. Acta Oncol 2022; 61:955-962. [PMID: 35943168 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2022.2098053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Precision cancer medicine (PCM), frequently used for the expensive and often modestly efficacious off-label treatment with medications matched to the tumour genome of end-stage cancer, challenges healthcare resources. We compared the health effects, costs and cost-effectiveness of our MetAction PCM study with corresponding data from comparator populations given best supportive care (BSC) in two external randomised controlled trials. METHODS We designed three partitioned survival models to evaluate the healthcare costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) as the main outcomes. Cost-effectiveness was calculated as the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of PCM relative to BSC with an annual willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of EUR 56,384 (NOK 605,000). One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses addressed uncertainty. RESULTS We estimated total healthcare costs (relating to next-generation sequencing (NGS) equipment and personnel wages, molecularly matched medications to the patients with an actionable tumour target and follow-up of the responding patients) and the health outcomes for the MetAction patients versus costs (relating to estimated hospital admission) and outcomes for the BSC cases. The ICERs for incremental QALYs were twice or more as high as the WTP threshold and relatively insensitive to cost decrease of the NGS procedures, while reduction of medication prices would contribute significantly towards a cost-effective PCM strategy. CONCLUSIONS The models suggested that the high ICERs of PCM were driven by costs of the NGS diagnostics and molecularly matched medications, with a likelihood for the strategy to be cost-effective defying WTP constraints. Reducing drug expenses to half the list price would likely result in an ICER at the WTP threshold. This can be an incentive for a public-private partnership for sharing drug costs in PCM, exemplified by ongoing European initiatives. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV, IDENTIFIER NCT02142036.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Hansen Ree
- Department of Oncology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Gunhild M Mælandsmo
- Department of Tumor Biology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute for Medical Biology, University of Tromsø - The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Kjersti Flatmark
- Department of Tumor Biology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute for Medical Biology, University of Tromsø - The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.,Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Hege G Russnes
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Cancer Genetics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Eline Aas
- Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Health Service Research Unit, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.,Division for Health Services, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Helland Å, Russnes HG, Fagereng GL, Al-Shibli K, Andersson Y, Berg T, Bjørge L, Blix E, Bjerkehagen B, Brabrand S, Cameron MG, Dalhaug A, Dietzel D, Dønnem T, Enerly E, Flobak Å, Fluge S, Gilje B, Gjertsen BT, Grønberg BH, Grønås K, Guren T, Hamre H, Haug Å, Heinrich D, Hjortland GO, Hovig E, Hovland R, Iversen AC, Janssen E, Kyte JA, von der Lippe Gythfeldt H, Lothe R, Lund JÅ, Meza-Zepeda L, Munthe-Kaas MC, Nguyen OTD, Niehusmann P, Nilsen H, Puco K, Ree AH, Riste TB, Semb K, Steinskog ESS, Stensvold A, Suhrke P, Tennøe Ø, Tjønnfjord GE, Vassbotn LJ, Aas E, Aasebø K, Tasken K, Smeland S. Correction to: Improving public cancer care by implementing precision medicine in Norway: IMPRESS-Norway. J Transl Med 2022; 20:317. [PMID: 35841045 PMCID: PMC9284821 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-022-03518-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Åslaug Helland
- Institute for Cancer Research/Department of Oncology/Division of Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. .,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Hege G Russnes
- Institute for Cancer Research/Department of Oncology/Division of Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Gro Live Fagereng
- Institute for Cancer Research/Department of Oncology/Division of Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | | | - Thomas Berg
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital in North of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.,Department of Clinical Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Line Bjørge
- Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.,Centre for Cancer Biomarkers CCBIO, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Egil Blix
- Department of Clinical Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.,Department of Oncology, University Hospital in North of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Bodil Bjerkehagen
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Sigmund Brabrand
- Institute for Cancer Research/Department of Oncology/Division of Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Astrid Dalhaug
- Department of Clinical Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.,Department of Oncology and Palliative Medicine, Nordland Hospital Trust, Bodø, Norway
| | | | - Tom Dønnem
- Department of Clinical Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.,Department of Oncology, University Hospital in North of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Espen Enerly
- Department of Research, The Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Åsmund Flobak
- Department of Oncology, The Cancer Clinic, St Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.,Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, The Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
| | | | | | - Bjørn Tore Gjertsen
- Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.,Centre for Cancer Biomarkers CCBIO, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Bjørn Henning Grønberg
- Department of Oncology, The Cancer Clinic, St Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.,Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, The Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
| | - Kari Grønås
- Patient Representative, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Tormod Guren
- Institute for Cancer Research/Department of Oncology/Division of Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Hanne Hamre
- Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
| | - Åse Haug
- Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | | | - Geir Olav Hjortland
- Institute for Cancer Research/Department of Oncology/Division of Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Eivind Hovig
- Institute for Cancer Research/Department of Oncology/Division of Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Centre of Bioinformatics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Randi Hovland
- Head of Section for Cancergenomics Section for Cancer Genomics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | | | - Emiel Janssen
- Section for Cancergenomics, Department of Pathology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.,Department of Chemistry, Bioscience and Environmental Engineering, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Jon Amund Kyte
- Institute for Cancer Research/Department of Oncology/Division of Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Ragnhild Lothe
- Institute for Cancer Research/Department of Oncology/Division of Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Jo-Åsmund Lund
- Dept of Oncology, Helse Møre and Romsdal Health Trust, Ålesund, Norway.,Dept of Health Sciences, NTNU, Ålesund, Norway
| | - Leonardo Meza-Zepeda
- Institute for Cancer Research/Department of Oncology/Division of Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | | | - Pitt Niehusmann
- Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Hilde Nilsen
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Katarina Puco
- Institute for Cancer Research/Department of Oncology/Division of Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Oncology, Haematology and Palliative Care, Lovisenberg Diaconal Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Anne Hansen Ree
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
| | | | - Karin Semb
- Department of Oncology, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Tønsberg, Norway
| | | | | | - Pål Suhrke
- Department of Pathology, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Tønsberg, Norway
| | - Øyvind Tennøe
- Department of Oncology, Kalnes Hospital, Grålum, Norway
| | - Geir E Tjønnfjord
- Department of Haematology, Oslo University Hospital, Tønsberg, Norway
| | | | - Eline Aas
- Institute of Health and Society, Department of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Division for Health Services, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Kjetil Tasken
- Institute for Cancer Research/Department of Oncology/Division of Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Sigbjørn Smeland
- Institute for Cancer Research/Department of Oncology/Division of Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Helland Å, Russnes HG, Fagereng GL, Al-Shibli K, Andersson Y, Berg T, Bjørge L, Blix E, Bjerkehagen B, Brabrand S, Cameron MG, Dalhaug A, Dietzel D, Dønnem T, Enerly E, Flobak Å, Fluge S, Gilje B, Gjertsen BT, Grønberg BH, Grønås K, Guren T, Hamre H, Haug Å, Heinrich D, Hjortland GO, Hovig E, Hovland R, Iversen AC, Janssen E, Kyte JA, von der Lippe Gythfeldt H, Lothe R, Lund JÅ, Meza-Zepeda L, Munthe-Kaas MC, Nguyen OTD, Niehusmann P, NilsenPuco HK, Ree AH, Riste TB, Semb K, Steinskog ESS, Stensvold A, Suhrke P, Tennøe Ø, Tjønnfjord GE, Vassbotn LJ, Aas E, Aasebø K, Tasken K, Smeland S. Improving public cancer care by implementing precision medicine in Norway: IMPRESS-Norway. J Transl Med 2022; 20:225. [PMID: 35568909 PMCID: PMC9107632 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-022-03432-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2022] [Accepted: 05/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Matching treatment based on tumour molecular characteristics has revolutionized the treatment of some cancers and has given hope to many patients. Although personalized cancer care is an old concept, renewed attention has arisen due to recent advancements in cancer diagnostics including access to high-throughput sequencing of tumour tissue. Targeted therapies interfering with cancer specific pathways have been developed and approved for subgroups of patients. These drugs might just as well be efficient in other diagnostic subgroups, not investigated in pharma-led clinical studies, but their potential use on new indications is never explored due to limited number of patients. Methods In this national, investigator-initiated, prospective, open-label, non-randomized combined basket- and umbrella-trial, patients are enrolled in multiple parallel cohorts. Each cohort is defined by the patient’s tumour type, molecular profile of the tumour, and study drug. Treatment outcome in each cohort is monitored by using a Simon two-stage-like ‘admissible’ monitoring plan to identify evidence of clinical activity. All drugs available in IMPRESS-Norway have regulatory approval and are funded by pharmaceutical companies. Molecular diagnostics are funded by the public health care system. Discussion Precision oncology means to stratify treatment based on specific patient characteristics and the molecular profile of the tumor. Use of targeted drugs is currently restricted to specific biomarker-defined subgroups of patients according to their market authorization. However, other cancer patients might also benefit of treatment with these drugs if the same biomarker is present. The emerging technologies in molecular diagnostics are now being implemented in Norway and it is publicly reimbursed, thus more cancer patients will have a more comprehensive genomic profiling of their tumour. Patients with actionable genomic alterations in their tumour may have the possibility to try precision cancer drugs through IMPRESS-Norway, if standard treatment is no longer an option, and the drugs are available in the study. This might benefit some patients. In addition, it is a good example of a public–private collaboration to establish a national infrastructure for precision oncology. Trial registrations EudraCT: 2020-004414-35, registered 02/19/2021; ClinicalTrial.gov: NCT04817956, registered 03/26/2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Åslaug Helland
- Institute for Cancer Research/Department of Oncology /Division of Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. .,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Hege G Russnes
- Institute for Cancer Research/Department of Oncology /Division of Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Gro Live Fagereng
- Institute for Cancer Research/Department of Oncology /Division of Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | | | - Thomas Berg
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital in North of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.,Department of Clinical Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Line Bjørge
- Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.,Centre for Cancer Biomarkers CCBIO, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Egil Blix
- Department of Clinical Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.,Department of Oncology, University Hospital in North of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Bodil Bjerkehagen
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Sigmund Brabrand
- Institute for Cancer Research/Department of Oncology /Division of Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Astrid Dalhaug
- Department of Clinical Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.,Department of Oncology and Palliative Medicine, Nordland Hospital Trust, Bodø, Norway
| | | | - Tom Dønnem
- Department of Clinical Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.,Department of Oncology, University Hospital in North of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Espen Enerly
- Department of Research, The Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Åsmund Flobak
- Department of Oncology, The Cancer Clinic, St Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.,Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, The Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
| | | | | | - Bjørn Tore Gjertsen
- Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.,Centre for Cancer Biomarkers CCBIO, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Bjørn Henning Grønberg
- Department of Oncology, The Cancer Clinic, St Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.,Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, The Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
| | - Kari Grønås
- Patient Representative, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Tormod Guren
- Institute for Cancer Research/Department of Oncology /Division of Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Hanne Hamre
- Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
| | - Åse Haug
- Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | | | - Geir Olav Hjortland
- Institute for Cancer Research/Department of Oncology /Division of Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Eivind Hovig
- Institute for Cancer Research/Department of Oncology /Division of Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Centre of Bioinformatics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Randi Hovland
- Head of Section for Cancergenomics Section for Cancer Genomics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | | | - Emiel Janssen
- Section for Cancergenomics, Department of Pathology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.,Department of Chemistry, Bioscience and Environmental Engineering, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Jon Amund Kyte
- Institute for Cancer Research/Department of Oncology /Division of Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Ragnhild Lothe
- Institute for Cancer Research/Department of Oncology /Division of Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Jo-Åsmund Lund
- Dept of Oncology, Helse Møre and Romsdal Health Trust, Ålesund, Norway.,Dept of Health Sciences, NTNU, Ålesund, Norway
| | - Leonardo Meza-Zepeda
- Institute for Cancer Research/Department of Oncology /Division of Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | | | - Pitt Niehusmann
- Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Hilde Katarina NilsenPuco
- Institute for Cancer Research/Department of Oncology /Division of Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Oncology, Haematology and Palliative Care, Lovisenberg Diaconal Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Anne Hansen Ree
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
| | | | - Karin Semb
- Department of Oncology, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Tønsberg, Norway
| | | | | | - Pål Suhrke
- Department of Pathology, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Tønsberg, Norway
| | - Øyvind Tennøe
- Department of Oncology, Kalnes Hospital, Grålum, Norway
| | - Geir E Tjønnfjord
- Department of Haematology, Oslo University Hospital, Tønsberg, Norway
| | | | - Eline Aas
- Institute of Health and Society, Department of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Division for Health Services, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Kjetil Tasken
- Institute for Cancer Research/Department of Oncology /Division of Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Sigbjørn Smeland
- Institute for Cancer Research/Department of Oncology /Division of Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ambrosini M, Del Re M, Manca P, Hendifar A, Drilon A, Harada G, Ree AH, Klempner S, Mælandsmo GM, Flatmark K, Russnes HG, Cleary JM, Singh H, Sottotetti E, Martinetti A, Randon G, Sartore-Bianchi A, Capone I, Milione M, Di Bartolomeo M, Pietrantonio F. ALK Inhibitors in Patients With ALK Fusion-Positive GI Cancers: An International Data Set and a Molecular Case Series. JCO Precis Oncol 2022; 6:e2200015. [PMID: 35476549 PMCID: PMC9200393 DOI: 10.1200/po.22.00015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
In GI cancers, anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangements are extremely less frequent than in non–small-cell lung cancer but may be important to offer personalized strategies of treatment in selected patients. Data about the activity and efficacy of ALK inhibitors (ALKi) in GI cancers are scarce. ALK inhibitors are active in patients with ALK fusion–positive GI cancers.![]()
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margherita Ambrosini
- Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Marzia Del Re
- Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenetics Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Paolo Manca
- Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrew Hendifar
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | | | - Anne Hansen Ree
- Department of Oncology, Akershus University Hospital, Lorenskog, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Gunhild Mari Mælandsmo
- Department of Tumor Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Kjersti Flatmark
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Hege G Russnes
- Division of Laboratory Medicine, Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Norway.,Division of Cancer Medicine, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - James M Cleary
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute,Boston, MA
| | - Harshabad Singh
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute,Boston, MA
| | - Elisa Sottotetti
- Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonia Martinetti
- Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Giovanni Randon
- Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Sartore-Bianchi
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milano (La Statale), Milan, Italy
| | - Iolanda Capone
- Pathology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Milione
- Pathology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Di Bartolomeo
- Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Filippo Pietrantonio
- Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Hjerkind KV, Johansson ALV, Trewin CB, Russnes HG, Ursin G. Incidence of breast cancer subtypes in immigrant and non-immigrant women in Norway. Breast Cancer Res 2022; 24:4. [PMID: 35012613 PMCID: PMC8751256 DOI: 10.1186/s13058-021-01498-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2020] [Accepted: 12/20/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast cancer incidence differs between non-immigrants and immigrants from low- and middle-income countries. This study investigates whether immigrants also have different subtype-specific incidences. METHODS We used national health registries in Norway and calculated subtype-specific incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for invasive breast cancer among women aged 20-75 and 20-49 years between 2005 and 2015. Immigrant groups were classified by country of birth broadly defined based on WHO regional groupings. Subtype was defined using estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) status as luminal A-like (ER+ PR+ HER2-), luminal B-like/HER2- (ER+ PR- HER2-), luminal B-like/HER2+ (ER+ PR any HER2+), HER2+ (ER-PR-HER2+) and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) (ER-PR-HER2-). RESULTS Compared to non-immigrants, incidence of the luminal A-like subtype was lower in immigrants from Sub-Saharan Africa (IRR 0.43 95% CI 0.28-0.66), South East Asia (IRR 0.63 95% CI 0.51-0.79), South Asia (IRR 0.67 95% CI 0.52-0.86) and Eastern Europe (IRR 0.86 95% CI 0.76-0.99). Immigrants from South Asia had higher rates of HER2 + tumors (IRR 2.02 95% CI 1.26-3.23). The rates of TNBC tended to be similar regardless of region of birth, except that women from South East Asia had an IRR of 0.54 (95% CI 0.32-0.91). CONCLUSIONS Women from Eastern Europe, Sub-Saharan Africa and Asia had different subtype-specific incidences compared to women from high-income countries (including non-immigrants). These differences in tumor characteristics between immigrant groups should be taken into consideration when planning preventive or screening strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirsti V. Hjerkind
- grid.418941.10000 0001 0727 140XDepartment of Registration, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Anna L. V. Johansson
- grid.4714.60000 0004 1937 0626Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institute, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden ,grid.418941.10000 0001 0727 140XCancer Registry of Norway, Postbox 5313, 0304 Majorstuen, Oslo, Norway
| | - Cassia B. Trewin
- grid.418941.10000 0001 0727 140XDepartment of Registration, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Hege G. Russnes
- grid.55325.340000 0004 0389 8485Department of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway ,grid.55325.340000 0004 0389 8485Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway
| | - Giske Ursin
- grid.418941.10000 0001 0727 140XCancer Registry of Norway, Postbox 5313, 0304 Majorstuen, Oslo, Norway ,grid.42505.360000 0001 2156 6853Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA USA ,grid.5510.10000 0004 1936 8921Department of Nutrition, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Rye IH, Huse K, Josefsson SE, Kildal W, Danielsen HE, Schlichting E, Garred Ø, Riis ML, OSBREAC, Lingjærde OC, Myklebust JH, Russnes HG. Breast cancer metastasis: immune profiling of lymph nodes reveals exhaustion of effector T cells and immunosuppression. Mol Oncol 2022; 16:88-103. [PMID: 34165864 PMCID: PMC8732351 DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.13047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2021] [Revised: 05/25/2021] [Accepted: 06/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Sentinel lymph nodes are the first nodes draining the lymph from a breast and could reveal early changes in the host immune system upon dissemination of breast cancer cells. To investigate this, we performed single-cell immune profiling of lymph nodes with and without metastatic cells. Whereas no significant changes were observed for B-cell and natural killer (NK)-cell subsets, metastatic lymph nodes had a significantly increased frequency of CD8 T cells and a skewing toward an effector/memory phenotype of CD4 and CD8 T cells, suggesting an ongoing immune response. Additionally, metastatic lymph nodes had an increased frequency of TIGIT (T-cell immunoreceptor with Ig and ITIM domains)-positive T cells with suppressed TCR signaling compared with non-metastatic nodes, indicating exhaustion of effector T cells, and an increased frequency of regulatory T cells (Tregs) with an activated phenotype. T-cell alterations correlated with the percentage of metastatic tumor cells, reflecting the presence of metastatic tumor cells driving T effector cells toward exhaustion and promoting immunosuppression by recruitment or increased differentiation toward Tregs. These results show that immune suppression occurs already in early stages of tumor progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inga Hansine Rye
- Department of Cancer GeneticsInstitute for Cancer ResearchDivision of Cancer MedicineOslo University HospitalRadiumhospitaletOsloNorway
| | - Kanutte Huse
- Department of Cancer ImmunologyInstitute for Cancer ResearchDivision of Cancer MedicineOslo University Hospital RadiumhospitaletNorway
- KG Jebsen Centre for B‐Cell MalignanciesInstitute for Clinical MedicineUniversity of OsloNorway
| | - Sarah E. Josefsson
- Department of Cancer ImmunologyInstitute for Cancer ResearchDivision of Cancer MedicineOslo University Hospital RadiumhospitaletNorway
- KG Jebsen Centre for B‐Cell MalignanciesInstitute for Clinical MedicineUniversity of OsloNorway
| | - Wanja Kildal
- Division of Cancer MedicineInstitute for Cancer Genetics and InformaticsOslo University HospitalRadiumhospitaletOsloNorway
| | - Håvard E. Danielsen
- Division of Cancer MedicineInstitute for Cancer Genetics and InformaticsOslo University HospitalRadiumhospitaletOsloNorway
- Department of InformaticsUniversity of OsloNorway
- Nuffield Division of Clinical Laboratory SciencesUniversity of OxfordUK
| | - Ellen Schlichting
- Department of OncologyDivision of Cancer MedicineOslo University HospitalNorway
| | - Øystein Garred
- Department of PathologyDivision of Laboratory MedicineOslo University HospitalNorway
| | - Margit L. Riis
- Department of OncologyDivision of Cancer MedicineOslo University HospitalNorway
| | - OSBREAC
- Oslo Breast Cancer ConsortiumOslo University HospitalNorway
| | | | - June H. Myklebust
- Department of Cancer ImmunologyInstitute for Cancer ResearchDivision of Cancer MedicineOslo University Hospital RadiumhospitaletNorway
- KG Jebsen Centre for B‐Cell MalignanciesInstitute for Clinical MedicineUniversity of OsloNorway
| | - Hege G. Russnes
- Department of Cancer GeneticsInstitute for Cancer ResearchDivision of Cancer MedicineOslo University HospitalRadiumhospitaletOsloNorway
- Department of PathologyDivision of Laboratory MedicineOslo University HospitalNorway
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Aamdal E, Jacobsen KD, Straume O, Kersten C, Herlofsen O, Karlsen J, Hussain I, Amundsen A, Dalhaug A, Nyakas M, Schuster C, Hagene KT, Holmsen K, Russnes HG, Skovlund E, Kaasa S, Aamdal S, Kyte JA, Guren TK. Ipilimumab in a real-world population: A prospective Phase IV trial with long-term follow-up. Int J Cancer 2022; 150:100-111. [PMID: 34449877 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.33768] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2021] [Revised: 06/29/2021] [Accepted: 07/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Ipilimumab was the first treatment that improved survival in advanced melanoma. Efficacy and toxicity in a real-world setting may differ from clinical trials, due to more liberal eligibility criteria and less intensive monitoring. Moreover, high costs and lack of biomarkers have raised cost-benefit concerns about ipilimumab in national healthcare systems and limited its use. Here, we report the prospective, interventional study, Ipi4 (NCT02068196), which aimed to investigate the toxicity and efficacy of ipilimumab in a real-world population with advanced melanoma. This national, multicentre, phase IV trial included 151 patients. Patients received ipilimumab 3 mg/kg intravenously and were followed for at least 5 years or until death. Treatment interruption or cessation occurred in 38%, most frequently due to disease progression (19%). Treatment-associated grade 3 to 4 toxicity was observed in 28% of patients, and immune-related toxicity in 56%. The overall response rate was 9%. Median overall survival was 12.1 months (95% CI: 8.3-15.9); and progression-free survival 2.7 months (95% CI: 2.6-2.8). After 5 years, 20% of patients were alive. In a landmark analysis from 6 months, improved survival was associated with objective response (HR 0.16, P = .001) and stable disease (HR 0.49, P = .005) compared to progressive disease. Poor performance status, elevated lactate dehydrogenase and C-reactive protein were identified as biomarkers. This prospective trial represents the longest reported follow-up of a real-world melanoma population treated with ipilimumab. Results indicate safety and efficacy comparable to phase III trials and suggest that the use of ipilimumab can be based on current cost-benefit estimates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elin Aamdal
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Oncology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
| | - Kari D Jacobsen
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Oddbjørn Straume
- Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.,Centre for Cancer Biomarkers, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | | | - Oluf Herlofsen
- Department of Oncology, Ålesund Hospital, Ålesund, Norway
| | - Jarle Karlsen
- The Cancer Clinic, St. Olav's Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Israr Hussain
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Anita Amundsen
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Astrid Dalhaug
- Department of Oncology and Palliative Medicine, Nordland Hospital, Norway
| | - Marta Nyakas
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Cornelia Schuster
- Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.,Centre for Cancer Biomarkers, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | | | - Kjersti Holmsen
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Hege G Russnes
- Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Eva Skovlund
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Stein Kaasa
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Steinar Aamdal
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Jon A Kyte
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Tormod K Guren
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Bjaanæs MM, Nilsen G, Halvorsen AR, Russnes HG, Solberg S, Jørgensen L, Brustugun OT, Lingjærde OC, Helland Å. Whole genome copy number analyses reveal a highly aberrant genome in TP53 mutant lung adenocarcinoma tumors. BMC Cancer 2021; 21:1089. [PMID: 34625038 PMCID: PMC8501630 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08811-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2021] [Accepted: 09/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Genetic alterations are common in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and DNA mutations and translocations are targets for therapy. Copy number aberrations occur frequently in NSCLC tumors and may influence gene expression and further alter signaling pathways. In this study we aimed to characterize the genomic architecture of NSCLC tumors and to identify genomic differences between tumors stratified by histology and mutation status. Furthermore, we sought to integrate DNA copy number data with mRNA expression to find genes with expression putatively regulated by copy number aberrations and the oncogenic pathways associated with these affected genes. METHODS Copy number data were obtained from 190 resected early-stage NSCLC tumors and gene expression data were available from 113 of the adenocarcinomas. Clinical and histopathological data were known, and EGFR-, KRAS- and TP53 mutation status was determined. Allele-specific copy number profiles were calculated using ASCAT, and regional copy number aberration were subsequently obtained and analyzed jointly with the gene expression data. RESULTS The NSCLC tumors tissue displayed overall complex DNA copy number profiles with numerous recurrent aberrations. Despite histological differences, tissue samples from squamous cell carcinomas and adenocarcinomas had remarkably similar copy number patterns. The TP53-mutated lung adenocarcinomas displayed a highly aberrant genome, with significantly altered copy number profiles including gains, losses and focal complex events. The EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinomas had specific arm-wise aberrations particularly at chromosome7p and 9q. A large number of genes displayed correlation between copy number and expression level, and the PI(3)K-mTOR pathway was highly enriched for such genes. CONCLUSIONS The genomic architecture in NSCLC tumors is complex, and particularly TP53-mutated lung adenocarcinomas displayed highly aberrant copy number profiles. We suggest to always include TP53-mutation status when studying copy number aberrations in NSCLC tumors. Copy number may further impact gene expression and alter cellular signaling pathways.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Adenocarcinoma of Lung/genetics
- Adenocarcinoma of Lung/pathology
- Alleles
- Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/genetics
- Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/pathology
- Chromosomes, Human, Pair 7
- Chromosomes, Human, Pair 9
- Class I Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases/genetics
- DNA Copy Number Variations
- Ex-Smokers
- Female
- Gene Dosage
- Gene Expression
- Genes, erbB-1/genetics
- Genes, p53
- Genes, ras/genetics
- Humans
- Lung Neoplasms/genetics
- Lung Neoplasms/pathology
- Male
- Non-Smokers
- Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
- Signal Transduction/genetics
- Smokers
- TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases/genetics
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Moksnes Bjaanæs
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital-The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, 4950 Nydalen Oslo, Norway
| | - Gro Nilsen
- Department of Computer Science, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ann Rita Halvorsen
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital-The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Hege G. Russnes
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital-The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Steinar Solberg
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Lars Jørgensen
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Odd Terje Brustugun
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital-The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Section of Oncology, Vestre Viken Hospital, Drammen, Norway
| | - Ole Christian Lingjærde
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital-The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Computer Science, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Åslaug Helland
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital-The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, 4950 Nydalen Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Janiszewska M, Stein S, Metzger Filho O, Eng J, Kingston NL, Harper NW, Rye IH, Alečković M, Trinh A, Murphy KC, Marangoni E, Cristea S, Oakes B, Winer EP, Krop IE, Russnes HG, Spellman PT, Bucher E, Hu Z, Chin K, Gray JW, Michor F, Polyak K. The impact of tumor epithelial and microenvironmental heterogeneity on treatment responses in HER2+ breast cancer. JCI Insight 2021; 6:147617. [PMID: 33886505 PMCID: PMC8262355 DOI: 10.1172/jci.insight.147617] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2021] [Accepted: 04/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite the availability of multiple human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-targeted (HER2-targeted) treatments, therapeutic resistance in HER2+ breast cancer remains a clinical challenge. Intratumor heterogeneity for HER2 and resistance-conferring mutations in the PIK3CA gene (encoding PI3K catalytic subunit α) have been investigated in response and resistance to HER2-targeting agents, while the role of divergent cellular phenotypes and tumor epithelial-stromal cell interactions is less well understood. Here, we assessed the effect of intratumor cellular genetic heterogeneity for ERBB2 (encoding HER2) copy number and PIK3CA mutation on different types of neoadjuvant HER2-targeting therapies and clinical outcome in HER2+ breast cancer. We found that the frequency of cells lacking HER2 was a better predictor of response to HER2-targeted treatment than intratumor heterogeneity. We also compared the efficacy of different therapies in the same tumor using patient-derived xenograft models of heterogeneous HER2+ breast cancer and single-cell approaches. Stromal determinants were better predictors of response than tumor epithelial cells, and we identified alveolar epithelial and fibroblastic reticular cells as well as lymphatic vessel endothelial hyaluronan receptor 1-positive (Lyve1+) macrophages as putative drivers of therapeutic resistance. Our results demonstrate that both preexisting and acquired resistance to HER2-targeting agents involve multiple mechanisms including the tumor microenvironment. Furthermore, our data suggest that intratumor heterogeneity for HER2 should be incorporated into treatment design.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michalina Janiszewska
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Molecular Medicine, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, Florida, USA
| | - Shayna Stein
- Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Otto Metzger Filho
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jennifer Eng
- OHSU Center for Spatial Systems Biomedicine, Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.,OHSU Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Natalie L Kingston
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Nicholas W Harper
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Inga H Rye
- Department of Pathology, Division of Laboratory Medicine, and Department of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Division of Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Maša Alečković
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Anne Trinh
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Katherine C Murphy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Simona Cristea
- Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Benjamin Oakes
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Eric P Winer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ian E Krop
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Hege G Russnes
- Department of Pathology, Division of Laboratory Medicine, and Department of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Division of Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Paul T Spellman
- OHSU Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.,Department of Molecular and Medical Genetics, School of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Elmar Bucher
- OHSU Center for Spatial Systems Biomedicine, Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.,OHSU Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Zhi Hu
- OHSU Center for Spatial Systems Biomedicine, Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.,OHSU Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Koei Chin
- OHSU Center for Spatial Systems Biomedicine, Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.,OHSU Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Joe W Gray
- OHSU Center for Spatial Systems Biomedicine, Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.,OHSU Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Franziska Michor
- Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.,Center for Cancer Evolution, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.,Ludwig Center at Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kornelia Polyak
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Center for Cancer Evolution, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.,Ludwig Center at Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Kyte JA, Andresen NK, Russnes HG, Fretland SØ, Falk RS, Lingjærde OC, Naume B. ICON: a randomized phase IIb study evaluating immunogenic chemotherapy combined with ipilimumab and nivolumab in patients with metastatic hormone receptor positive breast cancer. J Transl Med 2020; 18:269. [PMID: 32620163 PMCID: PMC7333428 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-020-02421-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2020] [Accepted: 06/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) targeting PD-1 or CTLA-4 has emerged as an important treatment modality for several cancer forms. In hormone receptor positive breast cancer (HR + BC), this therapeutic approach is largely unexplored. We have started a clinical trial, ICON (CA209-9FN), evaluating CPI combined with selected chemotherapy in patients with metastatic HR + BC. The tumor lymphocyte infiltration is predictive for the effect of chemotherapy in BC. In ICON, we use anthracycline, which are considered as "immunogenic" chemotherapy, and low-dose cyclophosphamide, which has been reported to counter immunosuppressive cells. METHODS ICON is a randomized exploratory phase IIb study evaluating the safety and efficacy of combining nivolumab (nivo; anti-PD-1) and ipilimumab (ipi; anti-CTLA-4) with chemotherapy in subjects with metastatic HR + BC. Primary objectives are aassessment of toxicity and progression-free survival. The trial will enrol 75 evaluable subjects, randomized 2:3 into two arms (A:B). Patients in Arm A receive only chemotherapy, i.e. pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD 20 mg/m2 intravenously every 2nd week) + cyclophosphamide (cyclo; 50 mg per day, first 2 weeks in each 4 week cycle). Patients in Arm B receive PLD + cyclo + ipilimumab (1 mg intravenously every 6th week) + nivolumab (240 mg intravenously every 2nd week). Patients in arm A will be offered ipi + nivo after disease progression. DISCUSSION ICON is among the first clinical trials combining chemotherapy with PD-1 and CTLA-4 blockade, and the first in BC. There is a strong preclinical rationale for exploring if anthracyclines, which are considered to induce immunogenic cell death, synergize with CPI, and for combining PD-1 and CTLA-4 blockade, as these checkpoints are important in different phases of the immune response. If the ICON trial suggests acceptable safety and provide a signal of clinical efficacy, further studies are warranted. The cross-over patients from Arm A receiving ipilimumab/nivolumab without concomitant chemotherapy represent the first BC cohort receiving this therapy. The ICON trial includes a series of translational sub-projects addressing clinically important knowledge gaps. These studies may uncover biomarkers or mechanisms of efficacy and resistance, thereby informing the development of novel combinatory regimes and of personalised biomarker-based therapy. Trial registration NCT03409198, Jan 24th 2018; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT03409198.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J A Kyte
- Department of Clinical Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. .,Department of Cancer Immunology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
| | - N K Andresen
- Department of Clinical Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Cancer Immunology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - H G Russnes
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - S Ø Fretland
- Department of Clinical Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - R S Falk
- Oslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - O C Lingjærde
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - B Naume
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Russnes HG. Clinical trials in the era of precision cancer medicine - for the few or for the many? Acta Oncol 2020; 59:731-732. [PMID: 32579040 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2020.1777582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Hege G. Russnes
- Head of Experimental Pathology and Trial Support, Department of Pathology, Clinic for Laboratory Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Group leader, Department of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Head of the National Precision Medicine Competence Network, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ree AH, Nygaard V, Boye K, Heinrich D, Dueland S, Bergheim IR, Johansen C, Beiske K, Negård A, Lund-Iversen M, Nygaard V, Hovig E, Nakken S, Nasser S, Julsrud L, Reisse CH, Ruud EA, Kristensen VN, Flørenes VA, Geitvik GA, Lingjærde OC, Børresen-Dale AL, Russnes HG, Mælandsmo GM, Flatmark K. Molecularly matched therapy in the context of sensitivity, resistance, and safety; patient outcomes in end-stage cancer - the MetAction study. Acta Oncol 2020; 59:733-740. [PMID: 32208873 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2020.1742377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Background: In precision cancer medicine, the challenge is to prioritize DNA driver events, account for resistance markers, and procure sufficient information for treatment that maintains patient safety. The MetAction project, exploring how tumor molecular vulnerabilities predict therapy response, first established the required workflow for DNA sequencing and data interpretation (2014-2015). Here, we employed it to identify molecularly matched therapy and recorded outcome in end-stage cancer (2016-2019).Material and methods: Metastatic tissue from 26 patients (16 colorectal cancer cases) was sequenced by the Oncomine assay. The study tumor boards interpreted called variants with respect to sensitivity or resistance to matched therapy and recommended single-agent or combination treatment if considered tolerable. The primary endpoint was the rate of progression-free survival 1.3-fold longer than for the most recent systemic therapy. The objective response rate and overall survival were secondary endpoints.Results: Both common and rare actionable alterations were identified. Thirteen patients were found eligible for therapy following review of tumor sensitivity and resistance variants and patient tolerability. The interventions were inhibitors of ALK/ROS1-, BRAF-, EGFR-, FGFR-, mTOR-, PARP-, or PD-1-mediated signaling for 2-3 cases each. Among 10 patients who received treatment until radiologic evaluation, 6 (46% of the eligible cases) met the primary endpoint. Four colorectal cancer patients (15% of the total study cohort) had objective response. The only serious adverse event was a transient colitis, which appeared in 1 of the 2 patients given PD-1 inhibitor with complete response. Apart from those two, overall survival was similar for patients who did and did not receive study treatment.Conclusions: The systematic MetAction approach may point forward to a refined framework for how to interpret the complexity of sensitivity versus resistance and patient safety that resides in tumor sequence data, for the possibly improved outcome of precision cancer medicine in future studies. ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT02142036.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Hansen Ree
- Department of Oncology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Vigdis Nygaard
- Department of Tumor Biology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Kjetil Boye
- Department of Tumor Biology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Daniel Heinrich
- Department of Oncology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
| | - Svein Dueland
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Christin Johansen
- Department of Oncology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
| | - Klaus Beiske
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Anne Negård
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Radiology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
| | | | - Vegard Nygaard
- Department of Core Facilities, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Eivind Hovig
- Department of Tumor Biology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Centre for Bioinformatics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Norwegian Cancer Genomics Consortium, Oslo, Norway
| | - Sigve Nakken
- Department of Tumor Biology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Norwegian Cancer Genomics Consortium, Oslo, Norway
- Centre for Cancer Cell Reprogramming, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Salah Nasser
- Department of Radiology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
| | - Lars Julsrud
- Department of Radiology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Espen A. Ruud
- Department of Radiology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
| | - Vessela N. Kristensen
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Gry A. Geitvik
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ole Christian Lingjærde
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Centre for Bioinformatics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Hege G. Russnes
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Gunhild M. Mælandsmo
- Department of Tumor Biology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute for Medical Biology, University of Tromsø – The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Kjersti Flatmark
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Tumor Biology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Pladsen AV, Nilsen G, Rueda OM, Aure MR, Borgan Ø, Liestøl K, Vitelli V, Frigessi A, Langerød A, Mathelier A, Engebråten O, Kristensen V, Wedge DC, Van Loo P, Caldas C, Børresen-Dale AL, Russnes HG, Lingjærde OC. DNA copy number motifs are strong and independent predictors of survival in breast cancer. Commun Biol 2020; 3:153. [PMID: 32242091 PMCID: PMC7118095 DOI: 10.1038/s42003-020-0884-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2019] [Accepted: 03/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Somatic copy number alterations are a frequent sign of genome instability in cancer. A precise characterization of the genome architecture would reveal underlying instability mechanisms and provide an instrument for outcome prediction and treatment guidance. Here we show that the local spatial behavior of copy number profiles conveys important information about this architecture. Six filters were defined to characterize regional traits in copy number profiles, and the resulting Copy Aberration Regional Mapping Analysis (CARMA) algorithm was applied to tumors in four breast cancer cohorts (n = 2919). The derived motifs represent a layer of information that complements established molecular classifications of breast cancer. A score reflecting presence or absence of motifs provided a highly significant independent prognostic predictor. Results were consistent between cohorts. The nonsite-specific occurrence of the detected patterns suggests that CARMA captures underlying replication and repair defects and could have a future potential in treatment stratification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arne V Pladsen
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Ullernchausseen 70 N-0310, Oslo, Norway
| | - Gro Nilsen
- Centre for Bioinformatics, Department of Informatics, University of Oslo, Gaustadalléen 23 B N-0373, Oslo, Norway
| | - Oscar M Rueda
- Cancer Research UK, Cambridge Research Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UK
| | - Miriam R Aure
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Ullernchausseen 70 N-0310, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ørnulf Borgan
- Department of Mathematics, University of Oslo, Moltke Moes vei 35 N-0851, Oslo, Norway
| | - Knut Liestøl
- Centre for Bioinformatics, Department of Informatics, University of Oslo, Gaustadalléen 23 B N-0373, Oslo, Norway
| | - Valeria Vitelli
- Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Domus Medica, Sognsvannsveien 9 N-0372, Oslo, Norway
| | - Arnoldo Frigessi
- Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Domus Medica, Sognsvannsveien 9 N-0372, Oslo, Norway
| | - Anita Langerød
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Ullernchausseen 70 N-0310, Oslo, Norway
| | - Anthony Mathelier
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Ullernchausseen 70 N-0310, Oslo, Norway
- Centre for Molecular Medicine Norway, University of Oslo, Forskningsparken, Gaustadalléen 21 N-0349, Oslo, Norway
| | - Olav Engebråten
- Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Kirkeveien 166 N-0450, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, POB 4953 Nydalen, N-0424, Oslo, Norway
| | - Vessela Kristensen
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Ullernchausseen 70 N-0310, Oslo, Norway
| | - David C Wedge
- Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7FZ, UK
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Warneford Ln, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7JX, UK
| | - Peter Van Loo
- The Francis Crick Institute, 1 Midland Road, London, NW1 1AT, UK
| | - Carlos Caldas
- Cancer Research UK, Cambridge Research Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UK
| | - Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Ullernchausseen 70 N-0310, Oslo, Norway
- Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Kirkeveien 166 N-0450, Oslo, Norway
| | - Hege G Russnes
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Ullernchausseen 70 N-0310, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, POB 4953 Nydalen N-0424, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ole Christian Lingjærde
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Ullernchausseen 70 N-0310, Oslo, Norway.
- Centre for Bioinformatics, Department of Informatics, University of Oslo, Gaustadalléen 23 B N-0373, Oslo, Norway.
- KG Jebsen Centre for B-cell malignancies, Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Ullernchausseen 70 N-0372, Oslo, Norway.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Tekpli X, Lien T, Røssevold AH, Nebdal D, Borgen E, Ohnstad HO, Kyte JA, Vallon-Christersson J, Fongaard M, Due EU, Svartdal LG, Sveli MAT, Garred Ø, Frigessi A, Sahlberg KK, Sørlie T, Russnes HG, Naume B, Kristensen VN. An independent poor-prognosis subtype of breast cancer defined by a distinct tumor immune microenvironment. Nat Commun 2019; 10:5499. [PMID: 31796750 PMCID: PMC6890706 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-13329-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 95] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2018] [Accepted: 10/30/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
How mixtures of immune cells associate with cancer cell phenotype and affect pathogenesis is still unclear. In 15 breast cancer gene expression datasets, we invariably identify three clusters of patients with gradual levels of immune infiltration. The intermediate immune infiltration cluster (Cluster B) is associated with a worse prognosis independently of known clinicopathological features. Furthermore, immune clusters are associated with response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In silico dissection of the immune contexture of the clusters identified Cluster A as immune cold, Cluster C as immune hot while Cluster B has a pro-tumorigenic immune infiltration. Through phenotypical analysis, we find epithelial mesenchymal transition and proliferation associated with the immune clusters and mutually exclusive in breast cancers. Here, we describe immune clusters which improve the prognostic accuracy of immune contexture in breast cancer. Our discovery of a novel independent prognostic factor in breast cancer highlights a correlation between tumor phenotype and immune contexture. In breast cancer, the immune infiltration of the tumour associates with clinical outcome. Here, the authors infer immune context based on gene expression data and identify a new independent subtype linked to pro-tumorigenic immune infiltration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xavier Tekpli
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Tonje Lien
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Andreas Hagen Røssevold
- Department of Cancer Immunology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Daniel Nebdal
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Elin Borgen
- Department of Pathology, Division of Laboratory Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Hege Oma Ohnstad
- Department of Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Jon Amund Kyte
- Department of Cancer Immunology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Johan Vallon-Christersson
- Division of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Scheelegatan 2, Medicon Village, 22185, Lund, Sweden
| | - Marie Fongaard
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Eldri Undlien Due
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Lisa Gregusson Svartdal
- Department of Pathology, Division of Laboratory Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - My Anh Tu Sveli
- Department of Pathology, Division of Laboratory Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Øystein Garred
- Department of Pathology, Division of Laboratory Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Arnoldo Frigessi
- Department of Biostatistics, Oslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Oslo and Research Support Services, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Kristine Kleivi Sahlberg
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Research, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Drammen, Norway
| | - Therese Sørlie
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Centre for Cancer Biomarkers CCBIO, Bergen, Norway
| | - Hege G Russnes
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Pathology, Division of Laboratory Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Bjørn Naume
- Department of Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Vessela N Kristensen
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. .,Centre for Cancer Biomarkers CCBIO, Bergen, Norway. .,Department of Clinical Molecular Biology, Division of Medicine, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ree AH, Nygaard V, Russnes HG, Heinrich D, Nygaard V, Johansen C, Bergheim IR, Hovig E, Beiske K, Negård A, Børresen-Dale AL, Flatmark K, Mælandsmo GM. Responsiveness to PD-1 Blockade in End-Stage Colon Cancer with Gene Locus 9p24.1 Copy-Number Gain. Cancer Immunol Res 2019; 7:701-706. [PMID: 30804006 DOI: 10.1158/2326-6066.cir-18-0777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2018] [Revised: 01/06/2019] [Accepted: 02/19/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Most patients whose large bowel cancer has spread to other organs do not respond to immune therapy. We detected a rare gene mutation, termed 9p24.1 copy-number gain (CNG), in an otherwise incurable colorectal cancer that provoked an immune therapy response. We identified this gene mutation by gene-panel sequencing of DNA from a liver metastasis biopsy from a patient who had disease refractory to standard therapies. Following immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) with pembrolizumab (anti-PD-1), the patient experienced conversion of the tumor phenotype from one with epithelial features to that of an inflamed microenvironment, detected by high-resolution RNA sequencing. Circulating tumor DNA disappeared over the first weeks of therapy. As assessed by standard radiographic measurement, the patient had a partial response that was durable. This patient's response may support the use of histology-agnostic ICB in solid tumors that carry the rare 9p24.1 CNG.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Hansen Ree
- Department of Oncology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Vigdis Nygaard
- Department of Tumor Biology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Hege G Russnes
- Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Daniel Heinrich
- Department of Oncology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
| | - Vegard Nygaard
- Department of Core Facilities, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Christin Johansen
- Department of Oncology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
| | | | - Eivind Hovig
- Department of Tumor Biology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Computer Science, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Norwegian Cancer Genomics Consortium, Oslo, Norway
| | - Klaus Beiske
- Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Anne Negård
- Department of Radiology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Kjersti Flatmark
- Department of Tumor Biology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Gunhild M Mælandsmo
- Department of Tumor Biology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute for Medical Biology, University of Tromsø-The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Russnes HG, Rye IH, Huse K, Schlichting E, Garred O, Mykelbust JH. Abstract P3-03-19: Tumor cell detection and immune profiling of lymph nodes from breast cancer patients by mass cytometry. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-p3-03-19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction:
A sentinel lymph node (SN) is the primary node draining the tumor and is assumed to be affected early in the metastatic process. Detection of metastases in SN is a standard procedure in breast cancer diagnostics based on microscopic evaluation (morphology and immunohistochemistry), determining the need for removal of all axillary glands for inspection which again is crucial for tailoring adjuvant therapy. The identification by microscopy is time-consuming and has a risk for false negative results.
We hypothesize that the immune profile of SN changes with the presence of tumor cells, even at very low frequencies (micrometastases). By using a multi marker approach to characterize millions of cells from sentinel lymph nodes with and without metastases we aimed at identifying both tumor cells but also characterize a tumor specific immune response. This dual approach might provide an opportunity for a more sensitive test for SN diagnostics.
Material and Methods:
We established a mass cytometry assay containing 38 markers (antibodies) using CyTOF technology to combine immune profiling with identification of breast cancer cells. Cell suspensions from 14 metastatic axillary lymph nodes (ALNmet), 16 metastatic sentinel lymph nodes (Snmet) and 14 non-metastatic sentinel lymph nodes (SN) from breast cancer patients from the clinical observational trial Oslo2 (early, operable breast cancer patients representing all subtypes) were successfully analyzed by the multimarker panel (single cell resolution).
Results:
By using mass cytometry, we detected tumor cells (gated as PanKeratin+/CD45- cells) in 86% (26/30) metastatic lymph nodes (ALNmet and Snmet) and in 14% (2/14) non-metastatic lymph nodes (SN). Further, the leukocyte population, identified as CD45+ cells, was gated into 15 subpopulations, mainly comprising different subsets of B and T cells, monocytes and NK cells. By comparing the leukocyte composition in the ALNmet with those in SN samples we identified a significant increase in the abundance of CD8+ memory phenotype, TFH and TCRγδ cells and a decrease in the CD4+ subpopulation in ALNmet compared to the SN samples. The Snmet samples had smaller deposits of tumor cells than the ALNmet samples, and we found no significant differences in leukocyte composition between Snmet and SN samples.
Interestingly, when looking at the activation marker CD56, we observed a significant higher expression in the CD4RO, CD8RO, TFH and Treg subpopulations of Snmet samples compared to SN samples.
Conclusion:
In this study we identified a significant difference in immune cell composition in lymph nodes with and without metastases (ALNmet compared to SN samples). We also identified activation markers unique for subpopulations of lymphocytes in Snmet, but not in negative lymph nodes (SN). We were also able to detect and identify micrometastases in most lymph nodes where morphological examination had identified them, but in addition found tumor cells in two samples scored as negative. The results will be validated in a larger sample series.
Citation Format: Russnes HG, Rye IH, Huse K, Schlichting E, Garred O, Mykelbust JH. Tumor cell detection and immune profiling of lymph nodes from breast cancer patients by mass cytometry [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-03-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - IH Rye
- Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - K Huse
- Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - O Garred
- Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Cheng J, Demeulemeester J, Wedge DC, Vollan HKM, Pitt JJ, Russnes HG, Pandey BP, Nilsen G, Nord S, Bignell GR, White KP, Børresen-Dale AL, Campbell PJ, Kristensen VN, Stratton MR, Lingjærde OC, Moreau Y, Van Loo P. Author Correction: Pan-cancer analysis of homozygous deletions in primary tumours uncovers rare tumour suppressors. Nat Commun 2019; 10:525. [PMID: 30692535 PMCID: PMC6349916 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-08512-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jiqiu Cheng
- Department of Electrical Engineering (ESAT) and iMinds Future Health Department, University of Leuven, Kasteelpark Arenberg 10, B-3001, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital Radiumhospitalet, N-0310, Oslo, Norway
| | - Jonas Demeulemeester
- The Francis Crick Institute, 1 Midland Road, NW1 1AT, London, UK.,Department of Human Genetics, University of Leuven, Herestraat 49, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - David C Wedge
- Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, CB10 1SA, Cambridge, UK.,Big Data Institute, University of Oxford, Old Road, OX3 7LF, Oxford, UK
| | - Hans Kristian M Vollan
- Department of Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital Radiumhospitalet, N-0310, Oslo, Norway.,The Francis Crick Institute, 1 Midland Road, NW1 1AT, London, UK
| | - Jason J Pitt
- Institute for Genomics and Systems Biology, University of Chicago, 900 East 57th Street, 60637, Chicago, IL, USA.,Committee on Genetics, Genomics, and Systems Biology, University of Chicago, 920 East 58th Street, 60637, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Hege G Russnes
- Department of Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital Radiumhospitalet, N-0310, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital Radiumhospitalet, N-0310, Oslo, Norway
| | - Bina P Pandey
- Department of Electrical Engineering (ESAT) and iMinds Future Health Department, University of Leuven, Kasteelpark Arenberg 10, B-3001, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Gro Nilsen
- Department of Informatics and Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, University of Oslo, N-0424, Oslo, Norway
| | - Silje Nord
- Department of Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital Radiumhospitalet, N-0310, Oslo, Norway
| | - Graham R Bignell
- Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, CB10 1SA, Cambridge, UK
| | - Kevin P White
- Institute for Genomics and Systems Biology, University of Chicago, 900 East 57th Street, 60637, Chicago, IL, USA.,Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Chicago, 1101 East 57th Street, 60637, Chicago, IL, USA.,Department of Human Genetics, University of Chicago, 920 East 58th Street, 60637, Chicago, IL, USA.,Tempus Labs, Inc, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale
- Department of Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital Radiumhospitalet, N-0310, Oslo, Norway
| | - Peter J Campbell
- Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, CB10 1SA, Cambridge, UK
| | - Vessela N Kristensen
- Department of Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital Radiumhospitalet, N-0310, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Ole Christian Lingjærde
- Department of Informatics and Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, University of Oslo, N-0424, Oslo, Norway
| | - Yves Moreau
- Department of Electrical Engineering (ESAT) and iMinds Future Health Department, University of Leuven, Kasteelpark Arenberg 10, B-3001, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Peter Van Loo
- The Francis Crick Institute, 1 Midland Road, NW1 1AT, London, UK. .,Department of Human Genetics, University of Leuven, Herestraat 49, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Cheng J, Demeulemeester J, Wedge DC, Vollan HKM, Pitt JJ, Russnes HG, Pandey BP, Nilsen G, Nord S, Bignell GR, White KP, Børresen-Dale AL, Campbell PJ, Kristensen VN, Stratton MR, Lingjærde OC, Moreau Y, Van Loo P. Author Correction: Pan-cancer analysis of homozygous deletions in primary tumours uncovers rare tumour suppressors. Nat Commun 2018; 9:5397. [PMID: 30559362 PMCID: PMC6297227 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-07842-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jiqiu Cheng
- Department of Electrical Engineering (ESAT) and iMinds Future Health Department, University of Leuven, Kasteelpark Arenberg 10, B-3001, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital Radiumhospitalet, N-0310, Oslo, Norway
| | - Jonas Demeulemeester
- The Francis Crick Institute, 1 Midland Road, London, NW1 1AT, UK.,Department of Human Genetics, University of Leuven, Herestraat 49, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - David C Wedge
- Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1SA, UK.,Big Data Institute, University of Oxford, Old Road, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK
| | - Hans Kristian M Vollan
- Department of Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital Radiumhospitalet, N-0310, Oslo, Norway.,The Francis Crick Institute, 1 Midland Road, London, NW1 1AT, UK
| | - Jason J Pitt
- Institute for Genomics and Systems Biology, University of Chicago, 900 East 57th Street, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.,Committee on Genetics, Genomics, and Systems Biology, University of Chicago, 920 East 58th Street, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA
| | - Hege G Russnes
- Department of Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital Radiumhospitalet, N-0310, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital Radiumhospitalet, N-0310, Oslo, Norway
| | - Bina P Pandey
- Department of Electrical Engineering (ESAT) and iMinds Future Health Department, University of Leuven, Kasteelpark Arenberg 10, B-3001, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Gro Nilsen
- Department of Informatics and Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, University of Oslo, N-0424, Oslo, Norway
| | - Silje Nord
- Department of Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital Radiumhospitalet, N-0310, Oslo, Norway
| | - Graham R Bignell
- Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1SA, UK
| | - Kevin P White
- Institute for Genomics and Systems Biology, University of Chicago, 900 East 57th Street, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.,Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Chicago, 1101 East 57th Street, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.,Department of Human Genetics, University of Chicago, 920 East 58th Street, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.,Tempus Labs, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale
- Department of Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital Radiumhospitalet, N-0310, Oslo, Norway
| | - Peter J Campbell
- Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1SA, UK
| | - Vessela N Kristensen
- Department of Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital Radiumhospitalet, N-0310, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Ole Christian Lingjærde
- Department of Informatics and Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, University of Oslo, N-0424, Oslo, Norway
| | - Yves Moreau
- Department of Electrical Engineering (ESAT) and iMinds Future Health Department, University of Leuven, Kasteelpark Arenberg 10, B-3001, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Peter Van Loo
- The Francis Crick Institute, 1 Midland Road, London, NW1 1AT, UK. .,Department of Human Genetics, University of Leuven, Herestraat 49, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Rye IH, Trinh A, Sætersdal AB, Nebdal D, Lingjærde OC, Almendro V, Polyak K, Børresen‐Dale A, Helland Å, Markowetz F, Russnes HG. Intratumor heterogeneity defines treatment-resistant HER2+ breast tumors. Mol Oncol 2018; 12:1838-1855. [PMID: 30133130 PMCID: PMC6210052 DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.12375] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2018] [Revised: 07/06/2018] [Accepted: 07/26/2018] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Targeted therapy for patients with HER2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer has improved overall survival, but many patients still suffer relapse and death from the disease. Intratumor heterogeneity of both estrogen receptor (ER) and HER2 expression has been proposed to play a key role in treatment failure, but little work has been done to comprehensively study this heterogeneity at the single-cell level. In this study, we explored the clinical impact of intratumor heterogeneity of ER protein expression, HER2 protein expression, and HER2 gene copy number alterations. Using combined immunofluorescence and in situ hybridization on tissue sections followed by a validated computational approach, we analyzed more than 13 000 single tumor cells across 37 HER2+ breast tumors. The samples were taken both before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus HER2-targeted treatment, enabling us to study tumor evolution as well. We found that intratumor heterogeneity for HER2 copy number varied substantially between patient samples. Highly heterogeneous tumors were associated with significantly shorter disease-free survival and fewer long-term survivors. Patients for which HER2 characteristics did not change during treatment had a significantly worse outcome. This work shows the impact of intratumor heterogeneity in molecular diagnostics for treatment selection in HER2+ breast cancer patients and the power of computational scoring methods to evaluate in situ molecular markers in tissue biopsies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inga H. Rye
- Department of Cancer GeneticsInstitute for Cancer ResearchOslo University Hospital RadiumhospitaletNorway
| | - Anne Trinh
- Cancer Research UKCambridge InstituteUniversity of CambridgeUK
- Present address:
Department of Medical OncologyDana‐Farber Cancer InstituteBostonMAUSA
| | | | - Daniel Nebdal
- Department of Cancer GeneticsInstitute for Cancer ResearchOslo University Hospital RadiumhospitaletNorway
| | - Ole Christian Lingjærde
- Department of Cancer GeneticsInstitute for Cancer ResearchOslo University Hospital RadiumhospitaletNorway
- Biomedical Informatics DivisionDepartment of Computer ScienceUniversity of OsloNorway
| | - Vanessa Almendro
- Department of Medical OncologyDana‐Farber Cancer InstituteBostonMAUSA
- Present address:
Vertex PharmaceuticalsBostonMAUSA
| | - Kornelia Polyak
- Department of Medical OncologyDana‐Farber Cancer InstituteBostonMAUSA
| | - Anne‐Lise Børresen‐Dale
- Department of Cancer GeneticsInstitute for Cancer ResearchOslo University Hospital RadiumhospitaletNorway
- Department of Clinical MedicineUniversity of OsloNorway
| | - Åslaug Helland
- Department of Cancer GeneticsInstitute for Cancer ResearchOslo University Hospital RadiumhospitaletNorway
- Department of OncologyOslo University HospitalNorway
- Department of Clinical MedicineUniversity of OsloNorway
| | | | - Hege G. Russnes
- Department of Cancer GeneticsInstitute for Cancer ResearchOslo University Hospital RadiumhospitaletNorway
- Department of PathologyOslo University HospitalNorway
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Głodzik D, Purdie C, Rye IH, Simpson PT, Staaf J, Span PN, Russnes HG, Nik-Zainal S. Mutational mechanisms of amplifications revealed by analysis of clustered rearrangements in breast cancers. Ann Oncol 2018; 29:2223-2231. [PMID: 30252041 PMCID: PMC6290883 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Complex clusters of rearrangements are a challenge in interpretation of cancer genomes. Some clusters of rearrangements demarcate clear amplifications of driver oncogenes but others are less well understood. A detailed analysis of rearrangements within these complex clusters could reveal new insights into selection and underlying mutational mechanisms. Patients and methods Here, we systematically investigate rearrangements that are densely clustered in individual tumours in a cohort of 560 breast cancers. Applying an agnostic approach, we identify 21 hotspots where clustered rearrangements recur across cancers. Results Some hotspots coincide with known oncogene loci including CCND1, ERBB2, ZNF217, chr8:ZNF703/FGFR1, IGF1R, and MYC. Others contain cancer genes not typically associated with breast cancer: MCL1, PTP4A1, and MYB. Intriguingly, we identify clustered rearrangements that physically connect distant hotspots. In particular, we observe simultaneous amplification of chr8:ZNF703/FGFR1 and chr11:CCND1 where deep analysis reveals that a chr8-chr11 translocation is likely to be an early, critical, initiating event. Conclusions We present an overview of complex rearrangements in breast cancer, highlighting a potential new way for detecting drivers and revealing novel mechanistic insights into the formation of two common amplicons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Głodzik
- Division of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden; Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge
| | - C Purdie
- Department of Pathology, Ninewells Hospital & Medical School, Dundee, UK
| | - I H Rye
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - P T Simpson
- Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - J Staaf
- Division of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - P N Span
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - H G Russnes
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - S Nik-Zainal
- Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge; Academic Department of Medical Genetics, The Clinical School University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Alcazar CRGD, Huh S, Ekram MB, Trinh A, Liu LL, Beca F, Xiaoyuan Z, Kwak M, Bergholtz H, Su Y, Ding L, Ding L, Russnes HG, Richardson AL, Babski K, Kim EMH, McDonnell CH, Wagner J, Rowberry R, Freeman G, Dillon D, Sorlie T, Coussens LM, Garber JE, Fan R, Bobolis K, Jeong J, Park SY, Michor F, Polyak K. Abstract A15: Immune-related changes in breast cancer tumor evolution. Cancer Immunol Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/2326-6074.tumimm17-a15] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Immunotherapy is a highly promising therapeutic option in metastatic disease albeit only in a subset of patients possibly due to heterogeneity in the mechanisms by which tumors escape immune surveillance. Immune cells shape tumor evolution directly (e.g., anti-tumor immune response) and indirectly (e.g., changing the microenvironment) by selecting for cancer cells with certain properties. We hypothesized that the in situ (DCIS) to invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) transition is a critical tumor progression step for immune escape in breast cancer that defines subsequent tumor evolution. In DCIS, cancer cells are physically separated from the stroma by the basement membrane and myoepithelial cell layer, and tumor-infiltrating leukocytes are rarely detected in direct contact with cancer cells. In contrast, in IDC, cancer cells and leukocytes are intermingled, thus, only cancer cells that can survive in this environment will play a role in disease progression. To dissect mechanisms of immune escape in breast cancer, we first analyzed the composition of leukocytes in normal breast tissues, DCIS, and IDC by polychromatic FACS. We found that DCIS and IDC contained significantly higher numbers of leukocytes, compared to normal breast, whereas in normal tissues more leukocytes were in the stromal than in the epithelial fraction. We also observed significant differences in the relative frequencies of several CD45+ cell types including increased neutrophils and decreased CD8+/CD4+ T cell ratios in tumors compared to normal stroma. Next, we analyzed the gene expression profiles of CD45+CD3+ T cells and found gene set enrichment of cytotoxic cells in DCIS including CD8+ T cells and NKT cells when compared to IDC. Conversely, we found enrichment for gene sets corresponding to regulatory T cells in IDC when compared to DCIS. Overall this suggested that DCIS had a more activated immune environment and IDC a more suppressed immune environment. We further explored this result by immunofluorescence (IF) and found fewer activated GZMB+CD8+ T cells in IDC than in DCIS, including a set of matched DCIS and locally recurrent IDC tissues. We also found that the TCR clonotype was more diverse in DCIS than in normal breast and IDCs. Interestingly we detected a few relatively frequent clones that were shared among different DCIS, one of which was previously shown to recognize a protein from the Epstein-Bar virus. To elucidate mechanisms of immune evasion in IDC, we performed IF analysis of immune checkpoint proteins PD-L1 and TIGIT and found significant differences between DCIS and IDC. TIGIT-expressing T cells were more slightly frequent in DCIS than in IDC. PD-L1 expression was higher in the epithelial cancer cells in triple negative IDC compared to DCIS, and amplification of CD274 (encoding PD-L1) was only detected in triple negative IDCs. Given the close proximity of ERBB2 (encoding HER2) to a cluster of genes encoding several chemokines, we analyzed the HER2+ samples from the TCGA. We found that co-amplification of 17q12 chemokine cluster (CC) with ERBB2 was enriched in HER+ER+ luminal-like tumors but not in the HER2+ER breast tumors. We also found higher expression of both T cell activation and inhibition-related genes in tumors that lack CC gain. Also by assessing tumor samples by multicolor FISH and IF, we determined that there is an inverse correlation between CC amplification and activation of CD8+ T cells. Overall our results show co-evolution of cancer cells and the immune microenvironment during tumor progression.
Citation Format: Carlos R. Gil del Alcazar, SungJin Huh, Muhammad B. Ekram, Anne Trinh, Lin L. Liu, Francisco Beca, Zi Xiaoyuan, Misuk Kwak, Helga Bergholtz, Ying Su, Lina Ding, Lina Ding, Hege G. Russnes, Andrea L. Richardson, Kirsten Babski, Elizabeth Min Hui Kim, Charles H. McDonnell, III, Jon Wagner, Ron Rowberry, Gordon Freeman, Deborah Dillon, Therese Sorlie, Lisa M. Coussens, Judy E. Garber, Rong Fan, Kristie Bobolis, Joon Jeong, So Yeon Park, Franziska Michor, Kornelia Polyak. Immune-related changes in breast cancer tumor evolution [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy; 2017 Oct 1-4; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Immunol Res 2018;6(9 Suppl):Abstract nr A15.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Anne Trinh
- 1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA,
| | - Lin L. Liu
- 1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA,
| | | | | | | | | | - Ying Su
- 1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA,
| | - Lina Ding
- 1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA,
| | - Lina Ding
- 1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA,
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Jon Wagner
- 4Sutter Roseville Medical Center, Roseville, CA,
| | - Ron Rowberry
- 4Sutter Roseville Medical Center, Roseville, CA,
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Rong Fan
- 2Yale University, New Haven, CT,
| | | | - Joon Jeong
- 7Yonsei University Medical College, Seoul, Korea, Republic of,
| | - So Yeon Park
- 8Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea, Republic of
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Alcazar CRGD, Huh S, Ekram MB, Trinh A, Liu LL, Beca F, Xiaoyuan Z, Kwak M, Bergholtz H, Su Y, Ding L, Russnes HG, Richardson AL, Babski K, Kim EMH, McDonnell CH, Wagner J, Rowberry R, Freeman GJ, Dillon D, Sorlie T, Coussens LM, Garber JE, Fan R, Bobolis K, Allred DC, Jeong J, Park SY, Michor F, Polyak K. Abstract A21: Characterization of the immune environment in the in situ to invasive breast carcinoma transition. Mol Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1557-3125.advbc17-a21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Reactivation of immune responses against cancer cells—immunotherapy—is one of the few cancer therapies that can successfully eliminate even metastatic disease in a relatively nontoxic manner. However, its success has been limited to a subset of patients. For example, in breast cancer only ~20% of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients benefit from anti-PDL1 therapy. One reason for this limited success can be that different tumors evade the immune system via different mechanisms, which suggests that they may respond to different types of immunotherapies. Epithelial cancer cells in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) are physically separated from the tumor-infiltrating leukocytes by the myoepithelial cell layer and the basement membrane, whereas in invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC), the epithelial cancer cells are intermingled with leukocytes. Therefore, we hypothesize that the DCIS to IDC transition is a key step in tumor progression as cancer cells are under different selection pressures, and only those that can evade the immune system can continue tumor progression, hence shaping subsequent tumor evolution. To dissect the role of leukocytes in the DCIS to IDC transition, we began by analyzing the composition and molecular profiles of leukocytes, with special emphasis on T cells, in normal breast tissues, DCIS, and IDC. We found that the relative frequency of leukocytes increases during tumor progression but the CD8/CD4 T cell ratio decreases. In addition, the gene expression profile of CD45+CD3+ T cells is different in DCIS compared to those isolated from normal breast tissue and IDCs. We found that gene set signatures corresponding to CD8+ T cells and NKT cells were enriched over regulatory T-cell signatures in DCIS compared to IDC. This result suggested that DCIS had a more activated immune environment compared to IDC. We further examined T-cell activation by immunofluorescence (IF) analysis and found a higher percentage of activated GZMB+CD8+ T cells in DCIS compared to IDC including a set of matched DCIS and locally recurrent IDC. We also found that the TCR clonotype was more diverse in DCIS than in IDCs. Interestingly, we detected a few relatively frequent clones that were shared among different DCIS patients, one of which was previously shown to recognize a protein from the Epstein-Bar virus. In order to dissect mechanisms of immune evasion in IDC, we analyzed immune checkpoint genes and proteins by FISH and IF. We found that TIGIT+ T cells were slightly more frequent in DCIS than in IDC. In triple-negative IDC, there was high expression of PD-L1 in epithelial cells and in 3/10 cases amplification of CD274 (encoding PD-L1), whereas DCIS had lower expression of PD-L1 and no amplification of CD274. To further elucidate mechanisms of immune evasion, we explored the significance of a cluster of genes encoding several chemokines that are located in close proximity of ERBB2 (encoding HER2). When analyzing the HER2+ samples from the TCGA, we found that coamplification of the 17q12 chemokine cluster (CC) with ERBB2 was enriched in HER2+ER+ luminal-like tumors, whereas there was either no gain or loss of the cluster in the HER2+ER breast tumors. Interestingly, we found higher expression of both T-cell activation and exhaustion-related genes in tumors that lack CC gain. Moreover, when assessing a cohort of HER2+ samples by multicolor FISH and IF, we found an inverse correlation between CC amplification and activation of CD8+ T cells. There was no correlation between CC amplification and recruitment of macrophages or myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Overall our results show coevolution of cancer cells and the immune microenvironment during tumor progression.
Citation Format: Carlos R. Gil del Alcazar, SungJin Huh, Muhammad B. Ekram, Anne Trinh, Lin L. Liu, Francisco Beca, Zi Xiaoyuan, Misuk Kwak, Helga Bergholtz, Ying Su, Lina Ding, Hege G. Russnes, Andrea L. Richardson, Kirsten Babski, Elizabeth Min Hui Kim, Charles H. McDonnell, III, Jon Wagner, Ron Rowberry, Gordon J. Freeman, Deborah Dillon, Therese Sorlie, Lisa M. Coussens, Judy E. Garber, Rong Fan, Kristie Bobolis, D. Craig Allred, Joon Jeong, So Yeon Park, Franziska Michor, Kornelia Polyak. Characterization of the immune environment in the in situ to invasive breast carcinoma transition [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Advances in Breast Cancer Research; 2017 Oct 7-10; Hollywood, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Res 2018;16(8_Suppl):Abstract nr A21.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Anne Trinh
- 1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA,
| | - Lin L. Liu
- 1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA,
| | | | | | | | | | - Ying Su
- 1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA,
| | - Lina Ding
- 1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA,
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Jon Wagner
- 4Sutter Roseville Medical Center, Roseville, CA,
| | - Ron Rowberry
- 4Sutter Roseville Medical Center, Roseville, CA,
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Rong Fan
- 2Yale University, New Haven, CT,
| | | | | | - Joon Jeong
- 8Yonsei University Medical College, Seoul, Korea, Republic of,
| | - So Yeon Park
- 9Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea, Republic of
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Ellingjord-Dale M, Vos L, Vik Hjerkind K, Hjartåker A, Russnes HG, Tretli S, Hofvind S, Dos-Santos-Silva I, Ursin G. Number of Risky Lifestyle Behaviors and Breast Cancer Risk. JNCI Cancer Spectr 2018; 2:pky030. [PMID: 31360858 PMCID: PMC6649737 DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pky030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2018] [Revised: 05/03/2018] [Accepted: 06/05/2018] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Lifestyle factors are associated with overall breast cancer risk, but less is known about their associations, alone or jointly, with risk of specific breast cancer subtypes. Methods We conducted a case-control subjects study nested within a cohort of women who participated in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program during 2006-2014 to examine associations between risky lifestyle factors and breast cancer risk. In all, 4402 breast cancer cases subjects with information on risk factors and hormone receptor status were identified. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs), with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), in relation to five risky lifestyle factors: body mass index (BMI) of 25 kg/m² or greater, three or more glasses of alcoholic beverages per week, ever smoking, fewer than four hours of physical activity per week, and ever use of menopausal hormone therapy. Analyses were adjusted for education, age at menarche, number of pregnancies, and menopausal status. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results Compared with women with no risky lifestyle behaviors, those with five had 85% (OR = 1.85, 95% CI = 1.42 to 2.42, P trend < .0001) increased risk of breast cancer overall. This association was limited to luminal A-like (OR = 2.20, 95% CI = 1.55 to 3.12, P trend < .0001) and luminal B-like human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive (OR = 1.66, 95% CI = 0.61 to 4.54, P trend < .004) subtypes. Number of risky lifestyle factors was not associated with increased risk of luminal B-like HER2-negative, HER2-positive, or triple-negative subtypes (P trend > .18 for all). Conclusions Number of risky lifestyle factors was positively associated with increased risk for luminal A-like and luminal B-like HER2-positive breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Linda Vos
- Department of research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Anette Hjartåker
- Department of nutrition, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Hege G Russnes
- Department of Pathology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Steinar Tretli
- Department of research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Solveig Hofvind
- Department of research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.,Department of radiography and dental technology, Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences, Oslo, Norway
| | - Isabel Dos-Santos-Silva
- Department of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Giske Ursin
- Department of research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.,Division of epidemiology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Ree AH, Flatmark K, Nygaard V, Heinrich D, Boye K, Dueland S, Nygaard V, Hovig E, Beiske K, Lund-Iversen M, Flørenes VA, Johansen C, Bergheim IR, Sathermugathevan M, Nakken S, Geitvik GA, Lingjærde OC, Børresen-Dale AL, Russnes HG, Mælandsmo GM. Abstract A101: The MetAction trial: long-lasting responses to molecularly matched therapy in end-stage cancer. Mol Cancer Ther 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.targ-17-a101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: The first phase of the MetAction trial established the required diagnostic infrastructure, implemented security-approved systems for handling of sensitive information, educated the Trial Team within the context of tumor boards, and estimated costs of the initiative within public health services. The endeavor enabled expedited and safe mutation profiling of metastatic tumors in order to offer molecularly matched medication for end-stage cancer (Ree et al., ESMO Open 2017;2:e000158). The aim of the second trial phase was to investigate the utility of the MetAction pipeline in clinical practice. Procedures: An eligible patient with end-stage metastatic disease from any origin had been on the previous line of systemic therapy for 6 or more weeks with radiologic evaluation intervals of 6-12 weeks and disease progression according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. Biopsy-sampled metastatic tissue was analyzed by DNA sequencing (Ion Oncomine™ Comprehensive Panel), where called variants were filtered prior to assessment and prioritization, supplemented with fluorescence in situ hybridization to cover relevant biomarkers. The Molecular Tumor Board interpreted the findings within the likelihood of signaling pathway activity, for the sequential Clinical Tumor Board to conclude on potential systemic tumor-directed medication. On study therapy, radiologic work-up was performed every 8 weeks. The primary objective was to compare progression-free survival (PFS) on study treatment, termed Period-B, with PFS for the most recent therapy, termed Period-A. If Period-B/Period-A was ≥1.3, the study therapy was deemed to be of benefit. The incidence of diagnostic adverse events and treatment-related grade 3-5 Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) toxicities was secondary end points. Results: 26 patients were enrolled. Biopsy procedures were undertaken at lung or pleural sites (6 cases), liver or peritoneal sites (19 cases), and an inguinal lymph node (1 case), and did not cause adverse events. Histologic entities were 18 adenocarcinomas (AC), 2 undifferentiated carcinomas, 1 case each of cholangiocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma, and 4 different sarcoma entities. 13 patients were found eligible for off-label use of molecularly matched therapy (inhibitor of ALK-, BRAF-, EGFR-, FGFR-, mTOR-, PARP-, ROS1-, or PD-1-mediated signaling). Among the 10 individuals who received study treatment until radiologic evaluation, 5 met the primary end point. The patient with cholangiocarcinoma and a patient with rectal AC primaries, both given crizotinib, obtained Period-B/Period-A outcome slightly better than 1.3. Notably, 3 patients with colon AC primaries, receiving either a combination of panitumumab with vemurafenib or chemotherapy or single-agent pembrolizumab, obtained long-lasting responses. In addition, 1 colon AC patient receiving pembrolizumab with RECIST progression (i.e., primary end point failure) before a long-lasting response to off-protocol continuation, reported CTCAE grade 3 toxicity (a colitis event that immediately resolved on high-dose prednisolone). Conclusion: MetAction procedures and treatments were safe. 15% (4/26) of patients with progressing end-stage cancer had the disease course substantially reversed by this biomarker-directed therapy approach.
Citation Format: Anne Hansen Ree, Kjersti Flatmark, Vigdis Nygaard, Daniel Heinrich, Kjetil Boye, Svein Dueland, Vegard Nygaard, Eivind Hovig, Klaus Beiske, Marius Lund-Iversen, Vivi A. Flørenes, Christin Johansen, Inger Riise Bergheim, Menaka Sathermugathevan, Sigve Nakken, Gry A. Geitvik, Ole C. Lingjærde, Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale, Hege G. Russnes, Gunhild M. Mælandsmo. The MetAction trial: long-lasting responses to molecularly matched therapy in end-stage cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference: Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2017 Oct 26-30; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2018;17(1 Suppl):Abstract nr A101.
Collapse
|
30
|
Ohnstad HO, Borgen E, Falk RS, Lien TG, Aaserud M, Sveli MAT, Kyte JA, Kristensen VN, Geitvik GA, Schlichting E, Wist EA, Sørlie T, Russnes HG, Naume B. Prognostic value of PAM50 and risk of recurrence score in patients with early-stage breast cancer with long-term follow-up. Breast Cancer Res 2017; 19:120. [PMID: 29137653 PMCID: PMC5686844 DOI: 10.1186/s13058-017-0911-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2017] [Accepted: 10/23/2017] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of the PAM50 intrinsic subtypes and risk of recurrence (ROR) score in patients with early breast cancer and long-term follow-up. A special focus was placed on hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) pN0 patients not treated with chemotherapy. METHODS Patients with early breast cancer (n = 653) enrolled in the observational Oslo1 study (1995-1998) were followed for distant recurrence and breast cancer death. Clinicopathological parameters were collected from hospital records. The primary tumors were analyzed using the Prosigna® PAM50 assay to determine the prognostic value of the intrinsic subtypes and ROR score in comparison with pathological characteristics. The primary endpoints were distant disease-free survival (DDFS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS). RESULTS Of 653 tumors, 52.2% were classified as luminal A, 26.5% as luminal B, 10.6% as HER2-enriched, and 10.7% as basal-like. Among the HR+/HER2- patients (n = 476), 37.8% were categorized as low risk by ROR score, 22.7% as intermediate risk, and 39.5% as high risk. Median follow-up durations for BCSS and DDFS were 16.6 and 7.1 years, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that intrinsic subtypes (all patients) and ROR risk classification (HR+/HER2- patients) yielded strong prognostic information. Among the HR+/HER2- pN0 patients with no adjuvant treatment (n = 231), 53.7% of patients had a low ROR, and their prognosis at 15 years was excellent (15-year BCSS 96.3%). Patients with intermediate risk had reduced survival compared with those with low risk (p = 0.005). In contrast, no difference in survival between the low- and intermediate-risk groups was seen for HR+/HER2- pN0 patients who received tamoxifen only. Ki-67 protein, grade, and ROR score were analyzed in the unselected, untreated pT1pN0 HR+/HER2- population (n = 171). In multivariate analysis, ROR score outperformed both Ki-67 and grade. Furthermore, 55% of patients who according to the PREDICT tool ( http://www.predict.nhs.uk/ ) would be considered chemotherapy candidates were ROR low risk (33%) or luminal A ROR intermediate risk (22%). CONCLUSIONS The PAM50 intrinsic subtype classification and ROR score improve classification of patients with breast cancer into prognostic groups, allowing for a more precise identification of future recurrence risk and providing an improved basis for adjuvant treatment decisions. Node-negative patients with low ROR scores had an excellent outcome at 15 years even in the absence of adjuvant therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hege O Ohnstad
- Division of Cancer Medicine, Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Postbox 4953 Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Elin Borgen
- Division of Laboratory Medicine, Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ragnhild S Falk
- Oslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Tonje G Lien
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Institute of Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Marit Aaserud
- Division of Laboratory Medicine, Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - My Anh T Sveli
- Division of Laboratory Medicine, Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Jon A Kyte
- Division of Cancer Medicine, Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Postbox 4953 Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway
| | - Vessela N Kristensen
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Institute of Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Division of Medicine, Department of Clinical Molecular Biology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
| | - Gry A Geitvik
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Institute of Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ellen Schlichting
- Breast and Endocrine Surgery Unit, Division of Cancer Medicine, Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Erik A Wist
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Therese Sørlie
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Institute of Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Hege G Russnes
- Division of Laboratory Medicine, Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Bjørn Naume
- Division of Cancer Medicine, Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Postbox 4953 Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Alves CP, Dey-Guha I, Kabraji S, Yeh AC, Talele NP, Solé X, Chowdhury J, Mino-Kenudson M, Loda M, Sgroi D, Borresen-Dale AL, Russnes HG, Ross KN, Ramaswamy S. AKT1 low Quiescent Cancer Cells Promote Solid Tumor Growth. Mol Cancer Ther 2017; 17:254-263. [PMID: 29054988 DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.mct-16-0868] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2016] [Revised: 06/21/2017] [Accepted: 10/04/2017] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Human tumor growth depends on rapidly dividing cancer cells driving population expansion. Even advanced tumors, however, contain slowly proliferating cancer cells for reasons that remain unclear. Here, we selectively disrupt the ability of rapidly proliferating cancer cells to spawn AKT1low daughter cells that are rare, slowly proliferating, tumor-initiating, and chemotherapy-resistant, using β1-integrin activation and the AKT1-E17K-mutant oncoprotein as experimental tools in vivo Surprisingly, we find that selective depletion of AKT1low slow proliferators actually reduces the growth of a molecularly diverse panel of human cancer cell xenograft models without globally altering cell proliferation or survival in vivo Moreover, we find that unusual cancer patients with AKT1-E17K-mutant solid tumors also fail to produce AKT1low quiescent cancer cells and that this correlates with significantly prolonged survival after adjuvant treatment compared with other patients. These findings support a model whereby human solid tumor growth depends on not only rapidly proliferating cancer cells but also on the continuous production of AKT1low slow proliferators. Mol Cancer Ther; 17(1); 254-63. ©2017 AACR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cleidson P Alves
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ipsita Dey-Guha
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sheheryar Kabraji
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Albert C Yeh
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Nilesh P Talele
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Xavier Solé
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Joeeta Chowdhury
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Mari Mino-Kenudson
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Massimo Loda
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Dennis Sgroi
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Anne-Lise Borresen-Dale
- Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital Radiumhospitalet, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Hege G Russnes
- Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital Radiumhospitalet, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Kenneth N Ross
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sridhar Ramaswamy
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts. .,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts.,Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts.,Harvard-Ludwig Center for Cancer Research, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Gil Del Alcazar CR, Huh SJ, Ekram MB, Trinh A, Liu LL, Beca F, Zi X, Kwak M, Bergholtz H, Su Y, Ding L, Russnes HG, Richardson AL, Babski K, Min Hui Kim E, McDonnell CH, Wagner J, Rowberry R, Freeman GJ, Dillon D, Sorlie T, Coussens LM, Garber JE, Fan R, Bobolis K, Allred DC, Jeong J, Park SY, Michor F, Polyak K. Immune Escape in Breast Cancer During In Situ to Invasive Carcinoma Transition. Cancer Discov 2017; 7:1098-1115. [PMID: 28652380 PMCID: PMC5628128 DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-17-0222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 158] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2017] [Revised: 05/22/2017] [Accepted: 06/21/2017] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
To investigate immune escape during breast tumor progression, we analyzed the composition of leukocytes in normal breast tissues, ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), and invasive ductal carcinomas (IDC). We found significant tissue and tumor subtype-specific differences in multiple cell types including T cells and neutrophils. Gene expression profiling of CD45+CD3+ T cells demonstrated a decrease in CD8+ signatures in IDCs. Immunofluorescence analysis showed fewer activated GZMB+CD8+ T cells in IDC than in DCIS, including in matched DCIS and recurrent IDC. T-cell receptor clonotype diversity was significantly higher in DCIS than in IDCs. Immune checkpoint protein TIGIT-expressing T cells were more frequent in DCIS, whereas high PD-L1 expression and amplification of CD274 (encoding PD-L1) was only detected in triple-negative IDCs. Coamplification of a 17q12 chemokine cluster with ERBB2 subdivided HER2+ breast tumors into immunologically and clinically distinct subtypes. Our results show coevolution of cancer cells and the immune microenvironment during tumor progression.Significance: The design of effective cancer immunotherapies requires the understanding of mechanisms underlying immune escape during tumor progression. Here we demonstrate a switch to a less active tumor immune environment during the in situ to invasive breast carcinoma transition, and identify immune regulators and genomic alterations that shape tumor evolution. Cancer Discov; 7(10); 1098-115. ©2017 AACR.See related commentary by Speiser and Verdeil, p. 1062This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1047.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- B7-H1 Antigen/genetics
- Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics
- Breast Neoplasms/genetics
- Breast Neoplasms/immunology
- CD3 Complex/genetics
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/genetics
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/immunology
- Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/genetics
- Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/immunology
- Disease Progression
- Female
- Gene Expression Profiling/methods
- Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic
- Humans
- Leukocyte Common Antigens/genetics
- Receptor, ErbB-2/genetics
- T-Lymphocytes/immunology
- Tumor Microenvironment
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos R Gil Del Alcazar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sung Jin Huh
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Muhammad B Ekram
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Anne Trinh
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Lin L Liu
- Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Francisco Beca
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Xiaoyuan Zi
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
- Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, P.R. China
| | - Minsuk Kwak
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Helga Bergholtz
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ying Su
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Lina Ding
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Hege G Russnes
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Andrea L Richardson
- Department of Cancer Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | | | - Jon Wagner
- Sutter Roseville Medical Center, Roseville, California
| | - Ron Rowberry
- Sutter Roseville Medical Center, Roseville, California
| | - Gordon J Freeman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Deborah Dillon
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Therese Sorlie
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Lisa M Coussens
- Department of Cell, Developmental & Cancer Biology, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Judy E Garber
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Rong Fan
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
| | | | - D Craig Allred
- Department of Pathology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Joon Jeong
- Department of Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Medical College, Seoul, Korea
| | - So Yeon Park
- Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Franziska Michor
- Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kornelia Polyak
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- The Broad Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts
- Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Russnes HG, Lingjærde OC, Børresen-Dale AL, Caldas C. Breast Cancer Molecular Stratification: From Intrinsic Subtypes to Integrative Clusters. Am J Pathol 2017; 187:2152-2162. [PMID: 28733194 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2017.04.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 150] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2017] [Revised: 04/19/2017] [Accepted: 04/27/2017] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Breast carcinomas can be stratified into different entities based on clinical behavior, histologic features, and/or by biological properties. A classification of breast cancer should be based on underlying biology, which we know must be determined by the somatic genomic landscape of mutations. Moreover, because the latest generations of anticancer agents are founded on biological mechanisms, a detailed molecular stratification is a requirement for appropriate clinical management. Such stratification, based on genomic drivers, will be important for selecting patients for clinical trials. It will also facilitate the discovery of novel drivers, the study of tumor evolution, and the identification of mechanisms of treatment resistance. Assays for risk stratification have focused mainly on response prediction to existing treatment regimens. Molecular stratification based on gene expression profiling revealed that breast cancers could be classified in so-called intrinsic subtypes (luminal A and B, HER2-enriched, basal-like, and normal-like), which mostly corresponded to hormone receptor and HER2 status, and further stratified luminal tumors based on proliferation. The realization that a significant proportion of the gene expression landscape is determined by the somatic copy number alterations that drive expression in cis led to the newer classification of breast cancers into integrative clusters. This stratification of breast cancers into integrative clusters reveals prototypical patterns of single-nucleotide variants and is associated with distinct clinical courses and response to therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hege G Russnes
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital Radiumhospitalet, Oslo, Norway; Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital Radiumhospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ole Christian Lingjærde
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital Radiumhospitalet, Oslo, Norway; Department of Computer Science, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital Radiumhospitalet, Oslo, Norway; Department of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Carlos Caldas
- Department of Oncology, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Ellingjord-Dale M, Vos L, Hjerkind KV, Hjartåker A, Russnes HG, Tretli S, Hofvind S, Dos-Santos-Silva I, Ursin G. Alcohol, Physical Activity, Smoking, and Breast Cancer Subtypes in a Large, Nested Case-Control Study from the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2017; 26:1736-1744. [PMID: 28877889 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-17-0611] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2017] [Revised: 08/23/2017] [Accepted: 08/31/2017] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: To what extent alcohol, smoking, and physical activity are associated with the various subtypes of breast cancer is not clear. We took advantage of a large population-based screening cohort to determine whether these risk factors also increase the risk of the poor prognosis subtypes.Methods: We conducted a matched case-control study nested within the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program during 2006-2014. A total of 4,402 breast cancer cases with risk factor and receptor data were identified. Five controls were matched to each case on year of birth and year of screening. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate ORs of breast cancer subtypes adjusted for potential confounders.Results: There were 2,761 luminal A-like, 709 luminal B-like HER2-negative, 367 luminal B-like HER2-positive, 204 HER2-positive, and 361 triple-negative cancers. Current alcohol consumption was associated with breast cancer risk overall [OR 1.26; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.09-1.45] comparing 6+ glasses a week to never drinkers. However, this risk increase was found only for luminal A-like breast cancer. Smoking 20+ cigarettes a day was associated with an OR of 1.41 (95% CI, 1.06-1.89) overall, with significant trends for luminal A-like and luminal B-like HER2-negative cancer. Current physical activity (4+ hours/week compared with none) was associated with 15% decreased risk of luminal A-like cancer, but not clearly with other subtypes.Conclusions: In this large study, alcohol, smoking, and physical activity were predominantly associated with luminal A-like breast cancer.Impact: Alcohol, smoking, and physical activity were associated with luminal A-like breast cancer subtype. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 26(12); 1736-44. ©2017 AACR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Linda Vos
- Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Anette Hjartåker
- Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Hege G Russnes
- Laboratory of Molecular Pathology, Division of Pathology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway.,Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | - Isabel Dos-Santos-Silva
- Department of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Giske Ursin
- Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Ree AH, Flatmark K, Nygaard V, Heinrich D, Boye K, Dueland S, Nygaard V, Hovig E, Beiske K, Lund-Iversen M, Flørenes VA, Johansen C, Bergheim IR, Sathermugathevan M, Nakken S, Geitvik GA, Lingjærde OC, Børresen-Dale AL, Russnes HG, Mælandsmo GM. The MetAction project: Biomarker-directed molecularly matched therapy for end-stage cancer implemented in clinical practice. J Clin Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2017.35.15_suppl.e14033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
e14033 Background: The MetAction project consists of two clinical trial phases. The completed first phase established the required diagnostic infrastructure, implemented security-approved systems for handling of sensitive information, educated the entire project staff within the context of tumor boards, and estimated costs of the initiative within public health services. The endeavor enabled expedite and safe mutation profiling of metastatic tumors in order to offer biomarker-based treatment with molecularly matched medication to patients with end-stage cancer, as reported in Ree et al., ESMO Open 2017. The ongoing second trial phase investigates the feasibility of the established MetAction pipeline in clinical practice. Methods: An eligible patient has end-stage metastatic disease from a solid cancer. Metastatic tissue is analyzed by DNA sequencing (Ion Oncomine™ Comprehensive Panel), where called variants are filtered prior to assessment and prioritization, supplemented with fluorescence in situ hybridization to cover relevant biomarkers. The Molecular Tumor Board interprets the findings within the likelihood of signaling pathway activity, and the sequential Clinical Tumor Board (CTB) may conclude on treatment with any systemic tumor-directed medication. Results: At the time of writing, 19 patients enrolled onto the second trial phase have accomplished the diagnostic procedures from sampling of metastatic tissue to CTB conclusion. Biopsy procedures were undertaken at lung or pleural sites (five cases), liver or superficial or deep peritoneal sites (13 cases), and an inguinal lymph node (one case) and did not cause adverse events. Histologic entities were 12 adenocarcinomas and one case each of squamous cell and undifferentiated carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, and four different sarcoma entities. Twelve patients have been found eligible for off-label use of molecularly matched therapy (inhibitor of ALK-, BRAF-, EGFR-, FGFR-, mTOR-, PARP-, or PD-1-mediated signaling). Conclusions: We will report on patient outcome (progression-free survival, overall response rate, and tolerance) to this biomarker-directed treatment in end-stage cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT02142036.
Collapse
|
36
|
Ree AH, Russnes HG, Heinrich D, Dueland S, Boye K, Nygaard V, Silwal-Pandit L, Østrup O, Hovig E, Nygaard V, Rødland EA, Nakken S, Øien JT, Johansen C, Bergheim IR, Skarpeteig V, Sathermugathevan M, Sauer T, Lund-Iversen M, Beiske K, Nasser S, Julsrud L, Reisse CH, Ruud EA, Flørenes VA, Hagene KT, Aas E, Lurås H, Johnsen-Soriano S, Geitvik GA, Lingjærde OC, Børresen-Dale AL, Mælandsmo GM, Flatmark K. Implementing precision cancer medicine in the public health services of Norway: the diagnostic infrastructure and a cost estimate. ESMO Open 2017; 2:e000158. [PMID: 28761742 PMCID: PMC5519811 DOI: 10.1136/esmoopen-2017-000158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2017] [Revised: 01/13/2017] [Accepted: 01/16/2017] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Through the conduct of an individual-based intervention study, the main purpose of this project was to build and evaluate the required infrastructure that may enable routine practice of precision cancer medicine in the public health services of Norway, including modelling of costs. METHODS An eligible patient had end-stage metastatic disease from a solid tumour. Metastatic tissue was analysed by DNA sequencing, using a 50-gene panel and a study-generated pipeline for analysis of sequence data, supplemented with fluorescence in situ hybridisation to cover relevant biomarkers. Cost estimations compared best supportive care, biomarker-agnostic treatment with a molecularly targeted agent and biomarker-based treatment with such a drug. These included costs for medication, outpatient clinic visits, admission from adverse events and the biomarker-based procedures. RESULTS The diagnostic procedures, which comprised sampling of metastatic tissue, mutation analysis and data interpretation at the Molecular Tumor Board before integration with clinical data at the Clinical Tumor Board, were completed in median 18 (8-39) days for the 22 study patients. The 23 invasive procedures (12 from liver, 6 from lung, 5 from other sites) caused a single adverse event (pneumothorax). Per patient, 0-5 mutations were detected in metastatic tumours; however, no actionable target case was identified for the current single-agent therapy approach. Based on the cost modelling, the biomarker-based approach was 2.5-fold more costly than best supportive care and 2.5-fold less costly than the biomarker-agnostic option. CONCLUSIONS The first project phase established a comprehensive diagnostic infrastructure for precision cancer medicine, which enabled expedite and safe mutation profiling of metastatic tumours and data interpretation at multidisciplinary tumour boards for patients with end-stage cancer. Furthermore, it prepared for protocol amendments, recently approved by the designated authorities for the second study phase, allowing more comprehensive mutation analysis and opportunities to define therapy targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Hansen Ree
- Department of Oncology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Hege G Russnes
- Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Cancer Genetics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Daniel Heinrich
- Department of Oncology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
| | - Svein Dueland
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Kjetil Boye
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Tumor Biology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Vigdis Nygaard
- Department of Tumor Biology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Olga Østrup
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Eivind Hovig
- Department of Tumor Biology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Computer Science, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Norwegian Cancer Genomics Consortium, Oslo, Norway
| | - Vegard Nygaard
- Department of Core Facilities, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Einar A Rødland
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Sigve Nakken
- Department of Tumor Biology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Norwegian Cancer Genomics Consortium, Oslo, Norway
| | - Janne T Øien
- Department of Tumor Biology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Christin Johansen
- Department of Oncology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
| | - Inger R Bergheim
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | | | - Torill Sauer
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Pathology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
| | | | - Klaus Beiske
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Salah Nasser
- Department of Radiology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
| | - Lars Julsrud
- Department of Radiology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Espen A Ruud
- Department of Radiology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
| | | | | | - Eline Aas
- Institute of Health & Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Health Services Research, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
| | - Hilde Lurås
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Health Services Research, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
| | - Siv Johnsen-Soriano
- Department of Oncology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.,Department of Tumor Biology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Gry A Geitvik
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ole Christian Lingjærde
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Computer Science, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Cancer Genetics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Kjersti Flatmark
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Tumor Biology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Abstract
The availability of large amounts of molecular data of unprecedented depth and width has instigated new paths of interdisciplinary activity in cancer research. Translation of such information to allow its optimal use in cancer therapy will require molecular biologists to embrace statistical and computational concepts and models. Progress in science has been and should be driven by our innate curiosity. This is the human quality that led Pandora to open the forbidden box, and like her, we do not know the nature or consequences of the output resulting from our actions. Throughout history, ground-breaking scientific achievements have been closely linked to advances in technology. The microscope and the telescope are examples of inventions that profoundly increased the amount of observable features that further led to paradigmatic shifts in our understanding of life and the Universe. In cell biology, the microscope revealed details of different types of tissue and their cellular composition; it revealed cells, their structures and their ability to divide, develop and die. Further, the molecular compositions of individual cell types were revealed gradually by generations of scientists. For each level of insight gained, new mathematical and statistical descriptive and analytical tools were needed (Figure 1a). The integration of knowledge of ever-increasing depth and width in order to develop useful therapies that can prevent and cure diseases such as cancer will continue to require the joint effort of scientists in biology, medicine, statistics, mathematics and computation. Here, we discuss some major challenges that lie ahead of us and why we believe that a deeper integration of biology and medicine with mathematics and statistics is required to gain the most from the diverse and extensive body of data now being generated. We also argue that to take full advantage of current technological opportunities, we must explore biomarkers using clinical studies that are optimally designed for this purpose. The need for a tight interdisciplinary collaboration has never been stronger.
Collapse
|
38
|
Potapenko IO, Lüders T, Russnes HG, Helland Å, Sørlie T, Kristensen VN, Nord S, Lingjærde OC, Børresen-Dale AL, Haakensen VD. Glycan-related gene expression signatures in breast cancer subtypes; relation to survival. Mol Oncol 2015; 9:861-76. [PMID: 25655580 DOI: 10.1016/j.molonc.2014.12.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2014] [Accepted: 12/27/2014] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Alterations in glycan structures are early signs of malignancy and have recently been proposed to be in part a driving force behind malignant transformation. Here, we explore whether differences in expression of genes related to the process of glycosylation exist between breast carcinoma subtypes - and look for their association to clinical parameters. Five expression datasets of 454 invasive breast carcinomas, 31 ductal carcinomas in situ (DCIS), and 79 non-malignant breast tissue samples were analysed. Results were validated in 1960 breast carcinomas. 419 genes encoding glycosylation-related proteins were selected. The DCIS samples appeared expression-wise similar to carcinomas, showing altered gene expression related to glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) and N-glycans when compared to non-malignant samples. In-situ lesions with different aggressiveness potentials demonstrated changes in glycosaminoglycan sulfation and adhesion proteins. Subtype-specific expression patterns revealed down-regulation of genes encoding glycan-binding proteins in the luminal A and B subtypes. Clustering basal-like samples using a consensus list of genes differentially expressed across discovery datasets produced two clusters with significantly differing prognosis in the validation dataset. Finally, our analyses suggest that glycolipids may play an important role in carcinogenesis of breast tumors - as demonstrated by association of B3GNT5 and UGCG genes to patient survival. In conclusion, most glycan-specific changes occur early in the carcinogenic process. We have identified glycan-related alterations specific to breast cancer subtypes including a prognostic signature for two basal-like subgroups. Future research in this area may potentially lead to markers for better prognostication and treatment stratification of breast cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ivan O Potapenko
- Department of Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital Radiumhospitalet, Norway; K.G. Jebsen Center for Breast Cancer Research, Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway
| | - Torben Lüders
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Molecular Biology (Epi-Gen), Akershus University Hospital, Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway
| | - Hege G Russnes
- Department of Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital Radiumhospitalet, Norway; K.G. Jebsen Center for Breast Cancer Research, Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway
| | - Åslaug Helland
- Department of Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital Radiumhospitalet, Norway; K.G. Jebsen Center for Breast Cancer Research, Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway; Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital Radiumhospitalet, Norway
| | - Therese Sørlie
- Department of Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital Radiumhospitalet, Norway; K.G. Jebsen Center for Breast Cancer Research, Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway
| | - Vessela N Kristensen
- Department of Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital Radiumhospitalet, Norway; K.G. Jebsen Center for Breast Cancer Research, Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway; Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Molecular Biology (Epi-Gen), Akershus University Hospital, Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway
| | - Silje Nord
- Department of Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital Radiumhospitalet, Norway; K.G. Jebsen Center for Breast Cancer Research, Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway
| | - Ole C Lingjærde
- Institute for Informatics, Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, University of Oslo, Norway
| | - Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale
- Department of Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital Radiumhospitalet, Norway; K.G. Jebsen Center for Breast Cancer Research, Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway
| | - Vilde D Haakensen
- Department of Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital Radiumhospitalet, Norway; K.G. Jebsen Center for Breast Cancer Research, Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Rye IH, Lundin P, Månér S, Fjelldal R, Naume B, Wigler M, Hicks J, Børresen-Dale AL, Zetterberg A, Russnes HG. Quantitative multigene FISH on breast carcinomas identifies der(1;16)(q10;p10) as an early event in luminal A tumors. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2014; 54:235-48. [PMID: 25546585 PMCID: PMC4369137 DOI: 10.1002/gcc.22237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2014] [Revised: 12/09/2014] [Accepted: 12/10/2014] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
In situ detection of genomic alterations in cancer provides information at the single cell level, making it possible to investigate genomic changes in cells in a tissue context. Such topological information is important when studying intratumor heterogeneity as well as alterations related to different steps in tumor progression. We developed a quantitative multigene fluorescence in situ hybridization (QM FISH) method to detect multiple genomic regions in single cells in complex tissues. As a “proof of principle” we applied the method to breast cancer samples to identify partners in whole arm (WA) translocations. WA gain of chromosome arm 1q and loss of chromosome arm 16q are among the most frequent genomic events in breast cancer. By designing five specific FISH probes based on breakpoint information from comparative genomic hybridization array (aCGH) profiles, we visualized chromosomal translocations in clinical samples at the single cell level. By analyzing aCGH data from 295 patients with breast carcinoma with known molecular subtype, we found concurrent WA gain of 1q and loss of 16q to be more frequent in luminal A tumors compared to other molecular subtypes. QM FISH applied to a subset of samples (n = 26) identified a derivative chromosome der(1;16)(q10;p10), a result of a centromere-close translocation between chromosome arms 1q and 16p. In addition, we observed that the distribution of cells with the translocation varied from sample to sample, some had a homogenous cell population while others displayed intratumor heterogeneity with cell-to-cell variation. Finally, for one tumor with both preinvasive and invasive components, the fraction of cells with translocation was lower and more heterogeneous in the preinvasive tumor cells compared to the cells in the invasive component. © 2014 The Authors Genes, Chromosomes & Cancer Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inga H Rye
- Department of Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Radiumhospitalet, 0424, Oslo, 0310, Norway; The K.G. Jebsen Center for Breast Cancer Research, Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Abstract
Extensive efforts have now characterized the somatic molecular alterations in human breast cancer (Cancer Genome Atlas Network, 2012; Stephens et al, 2012) and have led to a re-definition of the disease as a constellation of 10 distinct driver-based subtypes (IntClust subtypes) (Curtis et al, 2012). The pursuit of druggable targets for each of these subtypes is now pressing. This is elegantly illustrated by the work of Liu et al (2014).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hege G Russnes
- Department of Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research and Department of Pathology, Oslo University HospitalOslo, Norway
- K. G. Jebsen Center for Breast Cancer Research, University of OsloOslo, Norway
| | - Carlos Caldas
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute and Department of Oncology, Li Ka Shing Centre, University of CambridgeCambridge, UKE-mail: DOI 10.15252/emmm.201404683
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Trinh A, Rye IH, Almendro V, Helland Å, Russnes HG, Markowetz F. GoIFISH: a system for the quantification of single cell heterogeneity from IFISH images. Genome Biol 2014; 15:442. [PMID: 25168174 PMCID: PMC4167144 DOI: 10.1186/s13059-014-0442-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2014] [Accepted: 08/15/2014] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Molecular analysis has revealed extensive intra-tumor heterogeneity in human cancer samples, but cannot identify cell-to-cell variations within the tissue microenvironment. In contrast, in situ analysis can identify genetic aberrations in phenotypically defined cell subpopulations while preserving tissue-context specificity. GoIFISHGoIFISH is a widely applicable, user-friendly system tailored for the objective and semi-automated visualization, detection and quantification of genomic alterations and protein expression obtained from fluorescence in situ analysis. In a sample set of HER2-positive breast cancers GoIFISHGoIFISH is highly robust in visual analysis and its accuracy compares favorably to other leading image analysis methods. GoIFISHGoIFISH is freely available at www.sourceforge.net/projects/goifish/.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Trinh
- />University of Cambridge, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Robinson Way, CB2 0RE Cambridge UK
| | - Inga H Rye
- />Department of Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Postboks 4950 Nydalen, 0424 Oslo Norway
- />K. G. Jebsen Centre for Breast Cancer Research, University of Oslo, Postboks 4950 Nydalen, 0424 Oslo Norway
| | - Vanessa Almendro
- />Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, US
- />Harvard Medical School, Boston, US
| | - Åslaug Helland
- />Department of Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Postboks 4950 Nydalen, 0424 Oslo Norway
- />K. G. Jebsen Centre for Breast Cancer Research, University of Oslo, Postboks 4950 Nydalen, 0424 Oslo Norway
- />Department of Cancer treatment, Oslo University Hospital, Postboks 4950 Nydalen0424 Oslo, Norway
| | - Hege G Russnes
- />Department of Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Postboks 4950 Nydalen, 0424 Oslo Norway
- />K. G. Jebsen Centre for Breast Cancer Research, University of Oslo, Postboks 4950 Nydalen, 0424 Oslo Norway
- />Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Postboks 4950 Nydalen, 0424 Oslo, Norway
| | - Florian Markowetz
- />University of Cambridge, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Robinson Way, CB2 0RE Cambridge UK
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Yamamoto S, Wu Z, Russnes HG, Takagi S, Peluffo G, Vaske C, Zhao X, Moen Vollan HK, Maruyama R, Ekram MB, Sun H, Kim JH, Carver K, Zucca M, Feng J, Almendro V, Bessarabova M, Rueda OM, Nikolsky Y, Caldas C, Liu XS, Polyak K. JARID1B is a luminal lineage-driving oncogene in breast cancer. Cancer Cell 2014; 25:762-77. [PMID: 24937458 PMCID: PMC4079039 DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2014.04.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 140] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2013] [Revised: 02/12/2014] [Accepted: 04/24/2014] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Recurrent mutations in histone-modifying enzymes imply key roles in tumorigenesis, yet their functional relevance is largely unknown. Here, we show that JARID1B, encoding a histone H3 lysine 4 (H3K4) demethylase, is frequently amplified and overexpressed in luminal breast tumors and a somatic mutation in a basal-like breast cancer results in the gain of unique chromatin binding and luminal expression and splicing patterns. Downregulation of JARID1B in luminal cells induces basal genes expression and growth arrest, which is rescued by TGFβ pathway inhibitors. Integrated JARID1B chromatin binding, H3K4 methylation, and expression profiles suggest a key function for JARID1B in luminal cell-specific expression programs. High luminal JARID1B activity is associated with poor outcome in patients with hormone receptor-positive breast tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shoji Yamamoto
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Center for Functional Cancer Epigenetics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Zhenhua Wu
- Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Center for Functional Cancer Epigenetics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Hege G Russnes
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Center for Functional Cancer Epigenetics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Oslo University Hospital, Radiumhospitalet, Oslo 0310, Norway
| | - Shinji Takagi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Center for Functional Cancer Epigenetics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Guillermo Peluffo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Center for Functional Cancer Epigenetics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | | | - Xi Zhao
- Stanford Center for Cancer Systems Biology, Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | | | - Reo Maruyama
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Center for Functional Cancer Epigenetics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA; School of Medicine, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo 060-8556, Japan
| | - Muhammad B Ekram
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Center for Functional Cancer Epigenetics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Hanfei Sun
- Center for Functional Cancer Epigenetics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Department of Bioinformatics, School of Life Science and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
| | - Jee Hyun Kim
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Center for Functional Cancer Epigenetics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 110-799, Korea
| | - Kristopher Carver
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Center for Functional Cancer Epigenetics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Mattia Zucca
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Center for Functional Cancer Epigenetics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Jianxing Feng
- Department of Bioinformatics, School of Life Science and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
| | - Vanessa Almendro
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Center for Functional Cancer Epigenetics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | | | - Oscar M Rueda
- Cancer Research UK, Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK
| | - Yuri Nikolsky
- Thomson Reuters Healthcare & Science, Encinitas, CA 92024, USA
| | - Carlos Caldas
- Cancer Research UK, Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK
| | - X Shirley Liu
- Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Center for Functional Cancer Epigenetics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA 02141, USA
| | - Kornelia Polyak
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Center for Functional Cancer Epigenetics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA 02141, USA; Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Sternemalm J, Russnes HG, Zhao X, Risberg B, Nord S, Caldas C, Børresen-Dale AL, Stokke T, Patzke S. Nuclear CSPP1 expression defined subtypes of basal-like breast cancer. Br J Cancer 2014; 111:326-38. [PMID: 24901235 PMCID: PMC4102947 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2014.297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2013] [Revised: 03/24/2014] [Accepted: 05/09/2014] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The multi-exon CSPP1 gene, encoding for centrosome and microtubule-associated proteins involved in ciliogenesis and cell division, is a candidate oncogene in luminal breast cancer but expression of CSPP1 proteins remained unexplored. METHODS CSPP1 gene and protein expression was examined in normal mammary tissue, human breast cancer cell lines, and primary breast cancer biopsies from two patient cohorts. Cell type and epitope-dependent subcellular-specific CSPP1 staining pattern in normal mammary gland epithelium and cancer biopsies were correlated to molecular and clinical parameters. RESULTS A novel, nuclear localised CSPP1 isoform was exclusively detected in luminal epithelial cells, whereas cytoplasmic CSPP-L was generally expressed in normal mammary epithelium. Luminal cell-related nuclear CSPP1 expression was preserved in type-matched cell lines and carcinomas, and correlated to gene copy number and mRNA expression. In contrast, basal-like carcinomas displayed generally lower CSPP1 mRNA expression. Yet, a subgroup of basal-like breast carcinomas depicted nuclear CSPP1 expression, displayed luminal traits, and differed from nuclear CSPP1 devoid counterparts in expression of eight genes. Eight-gene signature defined groups of basal-like tumours from an independent cohort showed significant differences in survival. CONCLUSIONS Differential expression of a nuclear CSPP1 isoform identified biologically and clinically distinct subgroups of basal-like breast carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Sternemalm
- Department of Radiation Biology, Division of Cancer Medicine, Surgery and Transplantation, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospitals - Norwegian Radium Hospital, N-0310 Oslo, Norway
| | - H G Russnes
- 1] Departments of Genetics, Division of Cancer Medicine, Surgery and Transplantation, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospitals - Norwegian Radium Hospital, N-0310 Oslo, Norway [2] Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospitals - Norwegian Radium Hospital, N-0310 Oslo, Norway [3] K.G. Jebsen Center for Breast Cancer Research, Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, N-0310 Oslo, Norway
| | - X Zhao
- Center for Cancer Systems Biology, Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - B Risberg
- 1] Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospitals - Norwegian Radium Hospital, N-0310 Oslo, Norway [2] Institute for Medical Informatics, Oslo University Hospitals - Norwegian Radium Hospital, N-0310 Oslo, Norway
| | - S Nord
- 1] Departments of Genetics, Division of Cancer Medicine, Surgery and Transplantation, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospitals - Norwegian Radium Hospital, N-0310 Oslo, Norway [2] K.G. Jebsen Center for Breast Cancer Research, Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, N-0310 Oslo, Norway
| | - C Caldas
- 1] Breast Cancer Functional Genomics, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Research Institute, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK [2] Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Li Ka-Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK [3] Cambridge Breast Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital and Cambridge National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - A L Børresen-Dale
- 1] Departments of Genetics, Division of Cancer Medicine, Surgery and Transplantation, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospitals - Norwegian Radium Hospital, N-0310 Oslo, Norway [2] K.G. Jebsen Center for Breast Cancer Research, Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, N-0310 Oslo, Norway
| | - T Stokke
- Department of Radiation Biology, Division of Cancer Medicine, Surgery and Transplantation, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospitals - Norwegian Radium Hospital, N-0310 Oslo, Norway
| | - S Patzke
- Department of Radiation Biology, Division of Cancer Medicine, Surgery and Transplantation, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospitals - Norwegian Radium Hospital, N-0310 Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Abstract
Combined analyses of molecular data, such as DNA copy-number alteration, mRNA and protein expression, point to biological functions and molecular pathways being deregulated in multiple cancers. Genomic, metabolomic and clinical data from various solid cancers and model systems are emerging and can be used to identify novel patient subgroups for tailored therapy and monitoring. The integrative genomics methodologies that are used to interpret these data require expertise in different disciplines, such as biology, medicine, mathematics, statistics and bioinformatics, and they can seem daunting. The objectives, methods and computational tools of integrative genomics that are available to date are reviewed here, as is their implementation in cancer research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vessela N Kristensen
- 1] Department of Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Montebello, 0310 Oslo, Norway. [2] K.G. Jebsen Centre for Breast Cancer Research, Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, 0313 Oslo, Norway. [3] Department of Clinical Molecular Oncology, Division of Medicine, Akershus University Hospital, 1478 Ahus, Norway
| | - Ole Christian Lingjærde
- 1] K.G. Jebsen Centre for Breast Cancer Research, Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, 0313 Oslo, Norway. [2] Division for Biomedical Informatics, Department of Computer Science, University of Oslo, 0316 Oslo, Norway
| | - Hege G Russnes
- 1] Department of Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Montebello, 0310 Oslo, Norway. [2] K.G. Jebsen Centre for Breast Cancer Research, Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, 0313 Oslo, Norway. [3] Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, 0450 Oslo, Norway
| | - Hans Kristian M Vollan
- 1] Department of Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Montebello, 0310 Oslo, Norway. [2] K.G. Jebsen Centre for Breast Cancer Research, Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, 0313 Oslo, Norway. [3] Department of Oncology, Division of Cancer, Surgery and Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital, 0450 Oslo, Norway
| | - Arnoldo Frigessi
- 1] Statistics for Innovation, Norwegian Computing Center, 0314 Oslo, Norway. [2] Department of Biostatistics, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, PO Box 1122 Blindern, 0317 Oslo, Norway
| | - Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale
- 1] Department of Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Montebello, 0310 Oslo, Norway. [2] K.G. Jebsen Centre for Breast Cancer Research, Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, 0313 Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Zhao X, Rødland EA, Sørlie T, Vollan HKM, Russnes HG, Kristensen VN, Lingjærde OC, Børresen-Dale AL. Systematic assessment of prognostic gene signatures for breast cancer shows distinct influence of time and ER status. BMC Cancer 2014; 14:211. [PMID: 24645668 PMCID: PMC4000128 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2013] [Accepted: 02/21/2014] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The aim was to assess and compare prognostic power of nine breast cancer gene signatures (Intrinsic, PAM50, 70-gene, 76-gene, Genomic-Grade-Index, 21-gene-Recurrence-Score, EndoPredict, Wound-Response and Hypoxia) in relation to ER status and follow-up time. Methods A gene expression dataset from 947 breast tumors was used to evaluate the signatures for prediction of Distant Metastasis Free Survival (DMFS). A total of 912 patients had available DMFS status. The recently published METABRIC cohort was used as an additional validation set. Results Survival predictions were fairly concordant across most signatures. Prognostic power declined with follow-up time. During the first 5 years of followup, all signatures except for Hypoxia were predictive for DMFS in ER-positive disease, and 76-gene, Hypoxia and Wound-Response were prognostic in ER-negative disease. After 5 years, the signatures had little prognostic power. Gene signatures provide significant prognostic information beyond tumor size, node status and histological grade. Conclusions Generally, these signatures performed better for ER-positive disease, indicating that risk within each ER stratum is driven by distinct underlying biology. Most of the signatures were strong risk predictors for DMFS during the first 5 years of follow-up. Combining gene signatures with histological grade or tumor size, could improve the prognostic power, perhaps also of long-term survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xi Zhao
- Department of Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Montebello 0310 Oslo, Norway.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Almendro V, Cheng YK, Randles A, Itzkovitz S, Marusyk A, Ametller E, Gonzalez-Farre X, Muñoz M, Russnes HG, Helland A, Rye IH, Borresen-Dale AL, Maruyama R, van Oudenaarden A, Dowsett M, Jones RL, Reis-Filho J, Gascon P, Gönen M, Michor F, Polyak K. Inference of tumor evolution during chemotherapy by computational modeling and in situ analysis of genetic and phenotypic cellular diversity. Cell Rep 2014; 6:514-27. [PMID: 24462293 DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.12.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 200] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2013] [Revised: 11/14/2013] [Accepted: 12/30/2013] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Cancer therapy exerts a strong selection pressure that shapes tumor evolution, yet our knowledge of how tumors change during treatment is limited. Here, we report the analysis of cellular heterogeneity for genetic and phenotypic features and their spatial distribution in breast tumors pre- and post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy. We found that intratumor genetic diversity was tumor-subtype specific, and it did not change during treatment in tumors with partial or no response. However, lower pretreatment genetic diversity was significantly associated with pathologic complete response. In contrast, phenotypic diversity was different between pre- and posttreatment samples. We also observed significant changes in the spatial distribution of cells with distinct genetic and phenotypic features. We used these experimental data to develop a stochastic computational model to infer tumor growth patterns and evolutionary dynamics. Our results highlight the importance of integrated analysis of genotypes and phenotypes of single cells in intact tissues to predict tumor evolution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vanessa Almendro
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clinic, Institut d'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi i Sunyer, Barcelona 08036, Spain
| | - Yu-Kang Cheng
- Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Department of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Amanda Randles
- Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Department of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Center for Applied Scientific Computing, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94550, USA
| | - Shalev Itzkovitz
- Departments of Physics and Biology and Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA; Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel
| | - Andriy Marusyk
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Elisabet Ametller
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clinic, Institut d'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi i Sunyer, Barcelona 08036, Spain
| | - Xavier Gonzalez-Farre
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clinic, Institut d'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi i Sunyer, Barcelona 08036, Spain
| | - Montse Muñoz
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clinic, Institut d'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi i Sunyer, Barcelona 08036, Spain
| | - Hege G Russnes
- Department of Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital Radiumhospitalet, Oslo 0424, Norway; K.G. Jebsen Center for Breast Cancer Research, Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo 0316, Norway; Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo 0424, Norway
| | - Aslaug Helland
- Department of Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital Radiumhospitalet, Oslo 0424, Norway; Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo 0424, Norway; Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo 0316, Norway
| | - Inga H Rye
- Department of Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital Radiumhospitalet, Oslo 0424, Norway; K.G. Jebsen Center for Breast Cancer Research, Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo 0316, Norway
| | - Anne-Lise Borresen-Dale
- Department of Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital Radiumhospitalet, Oslo 0424, Norway; K.G. Jebsen Center for Breast Cancer Research, Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo 0316, Norway
| | - Reo Maruyama
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Alexander van Oudenaarden
- Departments of Physics and Biology and Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA; Hubrecht Institute, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences and University Medical Center Utrecht, Uppsalalaan 8, 3584 CT, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Mitchell Dowsett
- The Royal Marsden Hospital, The Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Robin L Jones
- The Royal Marsden Hospital, The Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London SW3 6JJ, UK; Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA 98109-1023, USA
| | - Jorge Reis-Filho
- The Royal Marsden Hospital, The Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London SW3 6JJ, UK; Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Pere Gascon
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clinic, Institut d'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi i Sunyer, Barcelona 08036, Spain
| | - Mithat Gönen
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Franziska Michor
- Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Department of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| | - Kornelia Polyak
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA; Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Garcia-Recio S, Fuster G, Fernandez-Nogueira P, Pastor-Arroyo EM, Park SY, Mayordomo C, Ametller E, Mancino M, Gonzalez-Farre X, Russnes HG, Engel P, Costamagna D, Fernandez PL, Gascón P, Almendro V. Substance P autocrine signaling contributes to persistent HER2 activation that drives malignant progression and drug resistance in breast cancer. Cancer Res 2013; 73:6424-34. [PMID: 24030979 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-12-4573] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
ERBB receptor transmodulation by heterologous G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) generates functional diversity in signal transduction. Tachykinins are neuropeptides and proinflammatory cytokines that promote cell survival and cancer progression by activating several GPCRs. In this work, we found that the pain-associated tachykinin Substance P (SP) contributes to persistent transmodulation of the ERBB receptors, EGFR and HER2, in breast cancer, acting to enhance malignancy and therapeutic resistance. SP and its high-affinity receptor NK-1R were highly expressed in HER2(+) primary breast tumors (relative to the luminal and triple-negative subtypes) and were overall correlated with poor prognosis factors. In breast cancer cell lines and primary cultures derived from breast cancer samples, we found that SP could activate HER2. Conversely, RNA interference-mediated attenuation of NK-1R, or its chemical inhibition, or suppression of overall GPCR-mediated signaling, all strongly decreased steady-state expression of EGFR and HER2, establishing that their basal activity relied upon transdirectional activation by GPCR. Thus, SP exposure affected cellular responses to anti-ERBB therapies. Our work reveals an important oncogenic cooperation between NK-1R and HER2, thereby adding a novel link between inflammation and cancer progression that may be targetable by SP antagonists that have been clinically explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susana Garcia-Recio
- Authors' Affiliations: Department of Medical Oncology and Pathology, Hospital Clínic, Institut d'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi i Sunyer, Department of Medicine, University of Barcelona; Department of Cell Biology, Immunology, and Neurosciences, Medical School, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea; Department of Genetics, Oslo University Hospital Radiumhospitalet, Norway; and Department of Medicine and Experimental Oncology, Torino University, Turin, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Margolin AA, Bilal E, Huang E, Norman TC, Ottestad L, Mecham BH, Sauerwine B, Kellen MR, Mangravite LM, Furia MD, Vollan HKM, Rueda OM, Guinney J, Deflaux NA, Hoff B, Schildwachter X, Russnes HG, Park D, Vang VO, Pirtle T, Youseff L, Citro C, Curtis C, Kristensen VN, Hellerstein J, Friend SH, Stolovitzky G, Aparicio S, Caldas C, Børresen-Dale AL. Systematic analysis of challenge-driven improvements in molecular prognostic models for breast cancer. Sci Transl Med 2013; 5:181re1. [PMID: 23596205 PMCID: PMC3897241 DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3006112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 99] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
Although molecular prognostics in breast cancer are among the most successful examples of translating genomic analysis to clinical applications, optimal approaches to breast cancer clinical risk prediction remain controversial. The Sage Bionetworks-DREAM Breast Cancer Prognosis Challenge (BCC) is a crowdsourced research study for breast cancer prognostic modeling using genome-scale data. The BCC provided a community of data analysts with a common platform for data access and blinded evaluation of model accuracy in predicting breast cancer survival on the basis of gene expression data, copy number data, and clinical covariates. This approach offered the opportunity to assess whether a crowdsourced community Challenge would generate models of breast cancer prognosis commensurate with or exceeding current best-in-class approaches. The BCC comprised multiple rounds of blinded evaluations on held-out portions of data on 1981 patients, resulting in more than 1400 models submitted as open source code. Participants then retrained their models on the full data set of 1981 samples and submitted up to five models for validation in a newly generated data set of 184 breast cancer patients. Analysis of the BCC results suggests that the best-performing modeling strategy outperformed previously reported methods in blinded evaluations; model performance was consistent across several independent evaluations; and aggregating community-developed models achieved performance on par with the best-performing individual models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam A. Margolin
- Sage Bionetworks, 1100 Fairview Avenue North, MS: M1-C108, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
| | - Erhan Bilal
- Functional Genomics and Systems Biology, IBM Computational Biology Center, P. O. Box 218, Yorktown Heights, NY 10598, USA
| | - Erich Huang
- Sage Bionetworks, 1100 Fairview Avenue North, MS: M1-C108, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
- Institute for Genome Sciences & Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Thea C. Norman
- Sage Bionetworks, 1100 Fairview Avenue North, MS: M1-C108, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
| | - Lars Ottestad
- Department of Oncology, Division of Cancer, Surgery and Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital, 0450 Oslo, Norway
| | - Brigham H. Mecham
- Sage Bionetworks, 1100 Fairview Avenue North, MS: M1-C108, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
- Trialomics, LLC, Seattle, WA 98103, USA
| | - Ben Sauerwine
- Google Inc., 651 North 34th Street, Seattle, WA 98103, USA
| | - Michael R. Kellen
- Sage Bionetworks, 1100 Fairview Avenue North, MS: M1-C108, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
| | - Lara M. Mangravite
- Sage Bionetworks, 1100 Fairview Avenue North, MS: M1-C108, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
| | - Matthew D. Furia
- Sage Bionetworks, 1100 Fairview Avenue North, MS: M1-C108, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
- Genomics Institute of the Novartis Research Foundation, San Diego, CA 92121, USA
| | - Hans Kristian Moen Vollan
- Department of Oncology, Division of Cancer, Surgery and Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital, 0450 Oslo, Norway
- Department of Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Montebello, 0310 Oslo, Norway
- K.G. Jebsen Centre for Breast Cancer Research, Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, 0313 Oslo, Norway
- Cancer Research UK, Cambridge Research Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK
| | - Oscar M. Rueda
- Cancer Research UK, Cambridge Research Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK
| | - Justin Guinney
- Sage Bionetworks, 1100 Fairview Avenue North, MS: M1-C108, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
| | - Nicole A. Deflaux
- Sage Bionetworks, 1100 Fairview Avenue North, MS: M1-C108, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
| | - Bruce Hoff
- Sage Bionetworks, 1100 Fairview Avenue North, MS: M1-C108, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
| | - Xavier Schildwachter
- Sage Bionetworks, 1100 Fairview Avenue North, MS: M1-C108, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
| | - Hege G. Russnes
- Department of Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Montebello, 0310 Oslo, Norway
- K.G. Jebsen Centre for Breast Cancer Research, Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, 0313 Oslo, Norway
- Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, 0450 Oslo, Norway
| | - Daehoon Park
- Department of Pathology, Drammen Hospital, Vestre Viken HF, 3004 Drammen, Norway
| | - Veronica O. Vang
- Department of Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Montebello, 0310 Oslo, Norway
- K.G. Jebsen Centre for Breast Cancer Research, Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, 0313 Oslo, Norway
| | - Tyler Pirtle
- Google Inc., 651 North 34th Street, Seattle, WA 98103, USA
| | - Lamia Youseff
- Google Inc., 651 North 34th Street, Seattle, WA 98103, USA
| | - Craig Citro
- Google Inc., 651 North 34th Street, Seattle, WA 98103, USA
| | - Christina Curtis
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
| | - Vessela N. Kristensen
- Department of Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Montebello, 0310 Oslo, Norway
- K.G. Jebsen Centre for Breast Cancer Research, Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, 0313 Oslo, Norway
- Department of Clinical Molecular Oncology, Division of Medicine, Akershus University Hospital, 1478 Ahus, Norway
| | | | - Stephen H. Friend
- Sage Bionetworks, 1100 Fairview Avenue North, MS: M1-C108, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
| | - Gustavo Stolovitzky
- Functional Genomics and Systems Biology, IBM Computational Biology Center, P. O. Box 218, Yorktown Heights, NY 10598, USA
| | - Samuel Aparicio
- Molecular Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z 1L3, Canada
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada
- Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer Agency, 675 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z 1L3, Canada
| | - Carlos Caldas
- Cancer Research UK, Cambridge Research Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK
- Cambridge Breast Unit, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK
- Cambridge Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK
| | - Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale
- Department of Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Montebello, 0310 Oslo, Norway
- K.G. Jebsen Centre for Breast Cancer Research, Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, 0313 Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Synnestvedt M, Borgen E, Russnes HG, Kumar NT, Schlichting E, Giercksky KE, Kåresen R, Nesland JM, Naume B. Combined analysis of vascular invasion, grade, HER2 and Ki67 expression identifies early breast cancer patients with questionable benefit of systemic adjuvant therapy. Acta Oncol 2013; 52:91-101. [PMID: 22934555 DOI: 10.3109/0284186x.2012.713508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Over-treatment of low-risk early breast cancer patients with adjuvant systemic therapies is an important clinical challenge. Better techniques are required which can be used to distinguish between the large group of patients with no residual disease after surgery and consequently no benefit of adjuvant treatment, from the smaller group with high relapse risk. A better integration of available prognostic factors might contribute to improved prediction of clinical outcome. MATERIAL AND METHODS The current study included 346 unselected pT1pN0 patients who did not receive adjuvant systemic treatment. In Norway, no patients with this stage were recommended systemic treatment at the time of the study (1995-1998). Histological type, tumour size, grade, vascular invasion (VI), hormone receptor (HR) status, HER2 and Ki67 (cut-off 10%) were analysed. Median follow-up was 86 months for relapse and 101 months for death. RESULTS Thirty-eight patients experienced relapse, 31 with distant metastasis. Twenty-one patients died of breast cancer. In univariate analysis grade, HER2, HR, VI and Ki67 had impact on clinical outcome (p < 0.005, log rank). In multivariate analysis, only grade 1-2 vs. grade 3, HER2, VI, and Ki67 status were significant for disease free survival, distant disease free survival, and/or breast cancer specific survival. These factors were used in combination, to separate patients into groups based on the number of unfavourable factors present [combined prognostic score (CPS) 0-4]. Close to 2/3 of the patients (61.4%) had no unfavourable factor (CPS0), whilst 18.4% had CPS ≥ 2. Only 3.6% of those with CPS0 developed metastasis (p < 0.001). The outcome was clearly worse for patients with CPS ≥ 2 (p < 0.001), systemic relapse was detected in approximately 40%. CONCLUSIONS This study indicates that the combined use of grade, VI, HER2 and Ki67 identifies a subgroup of breast cancer patients with a relapse risk that may question the benefit of adjuvant systemic therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marit Synnestvedt
- Department of Oncology, Division of Surgery and Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Radiumhospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Rye IH, Helland A, Sætersdal A, Naume B, Almendro V, Polyak K, Børessen-Dale AL, Russnes HG. Abstract P3-05-04: Intra-tumor heterogeneity as a predictor of therapy response in HER2 positive breast cancer. Cancer Res 2012. [DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs12-p3-05-04] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Breast cancer is known to be a heterogeneous disease both at the clinical and molecular level. In addition, heterogeneity can also exist within a given tumor, and subpopulations can have distinct phenotypic and genomic features. Little is known about the relationship between intra-tumor heterogeneity and prediction of response to treatment. This study aimed at using a combination of immunofluorescence and fluorescence in situ (FISH) technique (“double immunoFISH”) to identify intra-tumor heterogeneity in tumors from neo-adjuvant treated patients prior to and after therapy, searching for features predicting the response to neo adjuvant treatment.
Material and methods: Twentytwo patients diagnosed with HER2 positive, neo-adjuvant treated breast cancer ((3–4 FEC100 followed by 4 docetaxel plus trastuzumab, 3qw) were selected. Half of the patients had complete response and the others had partial response. By double immunoFISH both phenotypic (ER and HER2 protein) and genomic changes (copy number of HER2 gene and centromere 17) were assessed in the same cells simultaneously on biopsies before and after treatment. The samples were photographed in a Zeiss Axio Imager M1 with 5 fluorescence channels and analyzed with axiovision software. The intensity and localization of HER2 and ER immunofluorescence were semi-quantitatively estimated while the HER2 and centromere 17 FISH signals were counted in 100 cells.
Results: The patients with partial response displayed a high grade of cell-to-cell diversity regarding HER2 copy number, nuclear shape and size and the expression of the membrane protein HER2. This was in contrast to the results from the complete responders who showed a reduced diversity and were more frequently ER negative. In the patients with partial response, a higher diversity was seen after treatment.
Conclusion: The genomic variability prior to therapy was higher in the partial-responders vs. the complete responders, and the remaining tumor was even more heterogeneous after treatment than prior to treatment. Double immunoFISH is a valuable tool for visualization of both phenotypic and genomic alterations in the same cell in FFPE sections. The cohort will be expanded to explore the diversity further, and the results will be presented.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-05-04.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- IH Rye
- Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo, Norway; Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Å Helland
- Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo, Norway; Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - A Sætersdal
- Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo, Norway; Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - B Naume
- Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo, Norway; Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - V Almendro
- Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo, Norway; Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - K Polyak
- Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo, Norway; Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - A-L Børessen-Dale
- Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo, Norway; Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - HG Russnes
- Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo, Norway; Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|