Healthcare resource utilization of second-generation long-acting injectable antipsychotics in schizophrenia: risperidone versus paliperidone palmitate

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the trend of prescribing long-acting injections of paliperidone and risperidone in Central Serbia

Since the end of 2019, the global spread of COVID-19 has represented a historic event that changed our way of treating patients globally. The use of long-acting injections (LAI) antipsychotics was emphasized. Our goal was to investigate the impact of COVID-19 on the frequency of prescribing LAI and compare it with a period before. All patients (198) who started LAI-risperidone or LAI-paliperidone for the period 2017-2022, in Kragujevac, the city in Central Serbia, were considered. The frequency of prescribing LAI before and during COVID-19 and the total number of prescribed LAI per year were compared. Separately, the frequency of prescribing LAI-R and the frequency of prescribing LAI-P were compared. The significant (p < 0,05) increase in the use of LAI risperidone and paliperidone was in 2020 and 2021 [per year 2017(3), 2018(6), 2019(26), 2020(75), 2021(55), and 2022(33)]. The significant (p < 0,05) increase in monthly and quarterly preparations of LAI paliperidone was in 2020 and 2021 relative to the years before the pandemic. As the pandemic weakened, the inclusion of LAI paliperidone therapy weakened during 2022. A significant increase in usage of LAI risperidone was in 2022, and in 2020 and 2021 was as it was in the period 2017-2019. During COVID-19, especially in years when COVID-19 restriction measures were stricter, there was a significant change in the application method of antipsychotic therapy in favor of LAI. Regardless of the increase in treatment costs, patients' interests and protection were prioritized in the treatment process.

Comparison of health resource usage and costs associated with first-generation and second-generation long-acting injectable antipsychotics for patients with schizophrenia: A nationwide population-based cohort study

The aim of this study was to examine psychiatric resource utilization, medical costs and clinical outcomes for patients with schizophrenia who received either first-generation or second-generation long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics. A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD). Patients who began either first-generation or second-generation LAI treatment between 2015 and 2017 were enrolled and followed for three years. The data were evaluated using survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression models. Our findings demonstrated that both first- and second-generation LAI therapies led to notable reductions in the frequency of psychiatric hospitalizations and the duration of hospital stays when compared to the initial measurements. Additionally, the second-generation LAI group exhibited significantly lower rates of psychiatric emergencies and hospitalizations, as well as shorter hospital stays, compared to the first-generation LAI group. However, it is worth noting that the second-generation LAI group incurred higher pharmacy fees despite these favorable outcomes. The utilization of both first- and second-generation LAIs can enhance medication adherence and decrease the risk of acute exacerbation in patients with schizophrenia. These findings hold significant implications for schizophrenia management and the efficient allocation of healthcare resources.

Comparative effectiveness of long-acting injectable antipsychotics in patients with schizophrenia in Japan

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness of different long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) (aripiprazole, paliperidone, risperidone, and fluphenazine/haloperidol) in patients with schizophrenia in Japan.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using two administrative claims databases. The study population consisted of outpatients with schizophrenia who initiated LAIs between May 1, 2015, and November 30, 2019. We directly compared the risk of psychiatric hospitalization and LAI discontinuation among the LAIs based on hazard ratios (HRs) using Cox proportional hazards regression models.

RESULTS

The numbers of eligible patients who initiated aripiprazole, paliperidone, risperidone, and fluphenazine/haloperidol were 303, 124, 73, and 123, respectively. Regarding psychiatric hospitalization, aripiprazole and paliperidone were associated with significantly lower risk compared to fluphenazine/haloperidol (HR of aripiprazole: 0.47, 95 % CI: 0.28-0.78, HR of paliperidone: 0.50, 95 % CI: 0.28-0.89); HR of risperidone showed the same trend as the aripiprazole and paliperidone. Regarding LAI discontinuation, aripiprazole and paliperidone were associated with significantly lower risk of LAI discontinuation compared to fluphenazine/haloperidol (HR of aripiprazole: 0.53, 95 % CI: 95 % CI: 0.35-0.80, HR of paliperidone: 0.57, 95 % CI: 0.35-0.92). Aripiprazole was also associated with a significantly lower risk compared to risperidone (HR: 0.56, 95 % CI: 0.32-0.98).

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that aripiprazole and paliperidone are superior to fluphenazine/haloperidol in the risk of psychiatric hospitalization and LAI discontinuation. Aripiprazole is superior to risperidone in the risk of LAI discontinuation.

The Effect of Longer Dosing Intervals for Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics on Outcomes in Schizophrenia

Medication nonadherence in schizophrenia can have serious implications including relapses and hospitalization. Long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics require fewer administrations, while ensuring sustained medication coverage. In this review, we summarize the expected real-world benefits of longer dosing intervals in the management of schizophrenia. LAIs are associated with improved clinical outcomes of less frequent relapses and reduced functional impairment, encouraging patients to regain control of their lives. Aripiprazole lauroxil and paliperidone palmitate three-monthly (PP3M) LAIs have longer dosing intervals of 2-3 months and provide improved outcomes in patients with schizophrenia. Paliperidone palmitate six-monthly (PP6M) LAI provides the longest dosing interval, twice-yearly dosing, among existing LAIs. Decreasing the frequency of LAI administrations has the potential to reduce occurrence of serious outcomes associated with poor medication adherence. By eliminating the need for daily oral antipsychotic dosing, LAIs could increase the likelihood of patient acceptance, decrease stigma, and promote self-esteem. Longer intervals of medication coverage may be desirable for patients with higher risk of relapse including adults with recent-onset schizophrenia, those living in circumstances that may deprive them of regular access (eg, homeless), those that are in transitions between care settings or to reduce interpersonal contact during public health emergencies (eg, COVID-19 pandemic).

Mental healthcare utilisation by patients before and after receiving paliperidone palmitate treatment: mirror image analyses

OBJECTIVES

To compare mental healthcare use and healthcare professional (HCP) contacts for patients before and after initiation of paliperidone palmitate.

SETTING

The South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (SLAM) Biomedical Research Centre Clinical Record Interactive Search.

PARTICIPANTS

We identified all adults with a diagnosis of schizophrenia (International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision: F20.x), who had received paliperidone palmitate prescription for at least 365 days and had at least 1 year of recorded treatment from SLAM, prior to the first recorded receipt of paliperidone palmitate.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Inpatient and community mental healthcare service use, such as inpatient bed days, number of active days in the service, face-to-face and telephone HCP use in the 12 months before and after paliperidone palmitate initiation.

RESULTS

We identified 664 patients initiated on paliperidone palmitate. Following initiation, inpatient bed days were lower, although patients remained active on the service case load longer for both mirror approach 1 (mean difference of inpatient bed days -10.48 (95% CI -15.75 to -5.22); days active 40.67 (95% CI 33.39 to 47.95)) and mirror approach 2 (mean difference of inpatient bed days -23.96 (95% CI -30.01 to -17.92); mean difference of days active 40.69 (95% CI 33.39 to 47.94)). The postinitiation period was further characterised by fewer face-to-face and telephone contacts with medical and social work HCPs, and an increased contact with clinical psychologists.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate a change in the profile of HCP use, consistent with a transition from treatment to possible rehabilitation.

Adherence and persistence to long-acting injectable dopamine receptor blocking agent therapy in the United States: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies

The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess adherence and persistence to long-acting injectable dopamine receptor blocking agents (LAI DRBAs) in published observational cohort studies conducted in the United States. Adherence rate (proportion of days covered ≥80%) and persistence rate (no gap in therapy ≥60 days) to LAI DRBAs were examined in 26 articles for qualitative review and 8 articles for quantitative review. There was significant variability in adherence and persistence rates to LAI DRBAs in the reported observational cohort studies. The mean adherence and persistence rates to LAI DRBAs in the included studies were 36% (8-66%) and 56% (32-80%), respectively. The use of LAI DRBAs showed cumulative benefit of achieving adherence 1.40 times higher compared to oral agents. The persistence rate was measured by number of patients having no more than 60 days gap in therapy at follow-up, and the cumulative benefit of being persistently on the therapy was 1.65 times higher among the LAI agents-exposed group compared to the oral agents-exposed group. The use of LAI DRBAs confers benefit in adherence and persistence compared to oral DRBA formulations.

Inclisiran: A Novel Agent for Lowering Apolipoprotein B-Containing Lipoproteins

ABSTRACT

Hypercholesterolemia is a leading cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Accordingly, efforts to lower apolipoprotein B-containing lipoproteins in plasma are the centerpiece of strategies for cardiovascular prevention and treatment in primary and secondary management. Despite the importance of this endeavor, many patients do not achieve appropriate low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and non-high density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) goals, even among those who have experienced atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). The development of new LDL-C-lowering medications with alternative mechanisms of action will facilitate improved goal achievement in high risk patients. Inclisiran is a novel small interfering ribonucleic acid (siRNA)-based drug that is experimental in the US and approved for clinical use in the EU. It lowers LDL-C and other apolipoprotein B-containing lipoproteins by reducing production of Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 (PCSK9), a protein that normally contributes to LDL-receptor (LDLR) degradation, thereby increasing LDLR density and recycling in hepatocytes. Although the lipid-lowering efficacy of inclisiran is comparable to results achieved with PCSK9-blocking monoclonal antibodies (PCSK9i) (alirocumab and evolocumab), there are several important differences between the two drug classes. First, inclisiran reduces levels of PCSK9 both intracellularly and extracellularly by blocking translation of and degrading PCSK9 messenger RNA. Second, the long biological half-life of inclisiran produces sustained LDL-C-lowering with twice yearly dosing. Third, although PCSK9i drugs are proven to reduce ASCVD events, clinical outcomes trials with inclisiran are still in progress. In this manuscript, we review the clinical development of inclisiran, its mechanism of action, lipid-lowering efficacy, safety and tolerability, and potential clinical role of this promising new agent.

Epidemiology of schizophrenia and its management over 8-years period using real-world data in Spain

BACKGROUND

Real-World Data (RWD) studies provide important insights in disease epidemiology, in real clinical populations, with long follow-up periods. The aim of the present study was to describe the epidemiology of schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SD) during an 8-year period in Spain.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort of subjects aged 15 to 64 years was followed-up using electronic healthcare databases of the Valencia region (2008-2015). SD cases included outpatient and inpatient settings (ICD 9 codes 295.XX). Prevalence of SD was assessed. Incidence rate (IR) in the subpopulation aged between 15 and 34 years was also provided. Healthcare utilization (HCU) rates, including outpatient, specialists, hospitalizations and antipsychotic dispensations were estimated.

RESULTS

The cohort included 3,976,071 subjects; 24,749 of them had a prevalent diagnosis of SD. The overall prevalence for SD was 6.2 per 1000 persons. SD were 76% more prevalent in men than women. IR in the subpopulation aged between 15 and 34 years was 50.25 per 100,000 persons years and was more than 2 times higher for men than for women. 83.4% of the overall outpatient visits from the cohort of patients were related to SD. The 21,095 overall hospitalizations with the SD code resulted in 286,139 days of hospitalization, with a median of 4 days (IQR: 1.6-9.2) per person-year. 93.2% of subjects diagnosed with SD were ever treated with some antipsychotic drug during the study period, and 70% of the patients were ever treated with antipsychotic polypharmacy.

CONCLUSIONS

This large population-based study using RWD provides novel and recent information SD in a southern European country. The prevalence and IR of SD showed is greater than previously published and higher in men than in women. The fact of having used a large arsenal of electronic data (including outpatient and inpatient) for 8 years may have influenced. SD represents high burden and healthcare utilization. Contrary to guidelines recommendations the majority of patients were ever treated with antipsychotic polypharmacy.

Effectiveness of 1-year treatment with long-acting formulation of aripiprazole, haloperidol, or paliperidone in patients with schizophrenia: retrospective study in a real-world clinical setting

BACKGROUND

Schizophrenia is a chronic mental illness that requires lifelong antipsychotic treatment. Therapy discontinuation, often due to poor adherence, increases the risk of relapses after both first and subsequent psychotic episodes. Long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotic drugs (APDs) have been introduced to increase therapeutic adherence, reducing blood-level variability compared to corresponding oral preparations.

PURPOSE

To compare the effectiveness of three LAI-APDs: aripiprazole (Apr) prolonged release once monthly (OM) haloperidol decanoate (Hal-D) and paliperidone palmitate (PP-OM).

METHODS

We retrospectively collected data for all patients with schizophrenia or other psychoses (n=217) treated with the three LAI-APDs for the first time from January 1, 2012 to October 31, 2016: n=48 with Apr-OM, n=55 with Hal-D, and n=114 with PP-OM. After 6 and 12 months of LAI treatments, we assessed clinical and functioning improvement, urgent consultations, psychiatric hospitalizations, adverse effects, and dropout. We compared urgent consultations and psychiatric hospitalizations required by the same patient 6 and 12 months before and after LAI implementation. Data were statistically analyzed.

RESULTS

The three LAI groups differed significantly only for "need for economic support from social service" (more frequent in the Hal-D group) and "schizoaffective disorder" (prevalent in the Apr-OM group). Apr-OM was prescribed at the maximum dose required by the official guidelines, whereas the other two LAIs were prescribed at lower doses. After 6 and 12 months' treatment with the three LAI-APDs, we registered similar and significant reductions in both urgent consultations and psychiatric hospitalizations (P<0.001) and overlapping clinical and functioning improvement-scale scores (P<0.001), and 14.28% of patients dropped out, with no difference among the three LAI-APDs. Different kinds of adverse effects, though similar for number and severity, were reported in the three LAI groups.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that both first- and second-generation LAI-APDs represent important therapeutic options, useful for improving schizophrenia's clinical course and its economic burden. Our study, which offers a wide and comprehensive observation of real-world clinical settings, combined an effectiveness evaluation through mirror analysis performed for each individual patient to a subsequent comparison among the three LAI-APDs, allowing us a more complete evaluation of clinical efficacy.

A comparison of treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization, and costs among young adult Medicaid beneficiaries with schizophrenia treated with paliperidone palmitate or oral atypical antipsychotics in the US

BACKGROUND

Much of the burden associated with schizophrenia is attributed to its early onset and chronic nature. Treatment with once monthly paliperidone palmitate (PP1M) is associated with lower healthcare utilization and better adherence as compared to oral atypical antipsychotics (OAAs). This study aimed to evaluate real-world effectiveness of PP1M and OAA therapies among US-based adult Medicaid patients with schizophrenia, overall and among young adults aged 18-35 years.

METHODS

Adult patients with a diagnosis of schizophrenia and at least two claims for PP1M or OAA between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2014 were selected from the IBM Watson Health MarketScan Medicaid Database. Treatment patterns and healthcare resource utilization and costs were compared between PP1M and OAA treatment groups following inverse probability of treatment (IPT) weighting to adjust for potential differences. Utilization and cost outcomes were estimated using OLS and weighted Poisson regression models.

RESULTS

After IPT weighting, the young adult PP1M and OAA cohorts were comprised of 3,095 and 3,155 patients, respectively. PP1M patients had a higher duration of continuous treatment exposure (168.2 vs 132.5 days, p = .004) and better adherence on the index medication (proportion of days covered ≥80%: 19.0% vs 17.1%, p < .049). Young adults treated with PP1M were 37% less likely to have an all-cause inpatient admission (odds ratio [OR] = 0.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.53-0.74) and 33% less likely to have an ER visit (OR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.55-0.81) compared to OAA young adult patients, but 27% more likely to have an all-cause outpatient office visit (OR = 1.27, 95% CI = 1.02-1.56). PP1M patients incurred significantly lower medical costs as compared to OAA patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Medicaid patients with schizophrenia treated with PP1M have higher medication adherence and have fewer hospitalizations as compared to patients treated with OAAs. PP1M may lead to reduced healthcare utilization and improved clinical outcomes.

Treatment Patterns, Healthcare Resource Utilization and Costs Among Schizophrenia Patients Treated with Long-Acting Injectable Versus Oral Antipsychotics

INTRODUCTION

Long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotic use may reduce healthcare resource utilization compared with oral antipsychotic use by improving adherence and reducing dosing frequency. Our goal was to examine treatment patterns, healthcare utilization, and costs among recently diagnosed schizophrenia patients receiving oral versus LAI antipsychotics.

METHODS

The MarketScan Multi-state Medicaid database was used to identify schizophrenia patients aged ≥ 18 years who received an LAI or oral antipsychotic between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2014. Primary outcomes included treatment patterns such as adherence (measured as proportion of days covered-PDC), persistence, discontinuation, switching, and healthcare resource utilization and costs. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to control for differences in baseline characteristics between the cohorts. Outcomes were assessed over a 12-month post-index period and compared between treatment cohorts.

RESULTS

After PSM, 2302 patients were included in each of the LAI and oral antipsychotics cohorts. There were no differences in PDC or therapy switching between the two cohorts. Compared with the oral cohort, patients receiving LAIs had lower discontinuation rates (46.1 vs. 61.6%, p < 0.001), fewer inpatient admissions (0.5 vs. 0.9, p < 0.001), hospital days (3.9 vs. 6.5, p < 0.001), and ER visits (2.4 vs. 2.9, p = 0.007), and a higher number of prescription fills (29.5 vs. 25.3, p < 0.001). Patients prescribed LAIs had lower monthly inpatient ($US4007 vs. 8769, p < 0.001) and ER visits costs ($682 vs. 891, p < 0.001) but higher monthly medication costs ($10,713 vs. $655, p < 0.001) compared with the oral cohort over the 12-month post-index period. Overall, both cohorts had similar total medical costs (LAI vs. oral: $24,988 vs. 23,887, p = 0.354) during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

Patients receiving LAIs were more likely to remain on medication compared with the oral group, which may account for reduced inpatient admissions. Hospitalization cost reductions offset the higher costs of LAI medications, resulting in no increase in total healthcare costs relative to oral antipsychotic use.

FUNDING

Alkermes Inc.

Comparison of Paliperidone Palmitate and Risperidone Long-Acting Injection in Schizophrenic Patients: Results From a Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study in France

PURPOSE/BACKGROUND

The study objective was to compare the impact of being treated by paliperidone palmitate (PP) or risperidone long-acting injection (RLAI) on the length of stay on initial hospitalization, rehospitalization risk, and treatment duration in schizophrenic patients.

METHODS

We conducted an observational retrospective cohort study in 43 centers in France, including schizophrenic patients who initiated a treatment by PP or RLAI during initial hospitalization. The follow-up periods started in September 2012 for the RLAI group (median follow-up duration, 233 days) and in June 2013 for the PP group (259 days). Statistical analyses were based on Cox regression models, with propensity score weighting to account for differences in patients' characteristics.

FINDINGS/RESULTS

The analysis included 347 patients: 197 in the PP treatment group and 150 in the RLAI group. Compared with patients on RLAI, patients on PP were significantly more likely to have nonpsychiatric comorbidities, to have been on previous antipsychotic therapy, or to have been hospitalized for psychiatric care in the previous year. With regard to length of stay on initial hospitalization, there was no statistically significant difference between both groups (hazard ratio, 1.13 [0.97; 1.31]). Being on PP was associated with similar times to first rehospitalization compared with RLAI (hazard ratio, 0.92 [0.65; 1.30]).

IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS

We observed nonsignificant differences in initial hospitalization duration and time to rehospitalization between PP and RLAI, potentially due to lack of statistical power. A trend was observed in favor of PP with regard to time to treatment discontinuation, although this result was compromised by patients who switched between RLAI and PP.

Adherence, persistence, and inpatient utilization among adult schizophrenia patients using once-monthly versus twice-monthly long-acting atypical antipsychotics

AIMS

This study compared healthcare resource utilization (HRU), healthcare costs, adherence, and persistence among adult patients with schizophrenia using once-monthly (OM) vs twice-monthly (TM) atypical long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotic (AP) therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A longitudinal retrospective cohort study was conducted using Medicaid claims data from six states. Patients initiated on aripiprazole or paliperidone palmitate were assigned to the OM cohort; risperidone-treated patients were assigned to the TM cohort. HRU and healthcare costs were assessed during the first 12 months following stabilization on the medication. Adherence was measured using the proportion of days covered (PDC) during the first year of follow-up. Persistence to the index medication was measured during the first 2 years following the index date. Comparison between the cohorts was achieved using multivariable generalized linear models, adjusting for demographic and clinical characteristics.

RESULTS

Patients in the OM LAI cohort had lower inpatient HRU and medical costs when compared with patients in the TM cohort. Higher medical costs in the TM LAI cohort offset the higher pharmacy costs in the OM LAI cohort. Mean PDC during the first 12 months of follow-up was higher in the OM cohort than in the TM cohort (0.56 vs 0.50, p < .01). Median persistence was longer in the OM cohort than in the TM cohort (7.5 months vs 5.5 months), as was the hazard of discontinuing the index medication (hazard ratio = 0.83, p = .01). Kaplan-Meier rates of persistence at 1 year were higher for OM patients than for TM patients (37.6% vs 29.6%, p < .01).

LIMITATIONS

This was a Medicaid sample with few aripiprazole LAI patients (5.4% of OM cohort). Medication use was inferred from pharmacy claims.

CONCLUSIONS

Among Medicaid patients in these six states, OM AP treatment was associated with lower HRU, better adherence and persistence, and similar total costs compared to patients on TM treatment.

All-cause hospitalization and associated costs in patients with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder initiating long-acting injectable antipsychotics

OBJECTIVE

To compare all-cause hospitalization and associated costs among patients with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder (BD) treated with long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs).

METHODS

The Truven MarketScan Medicaid claims database was used to identify patients with schizophrenia; MarketScan Medicaid and commercial claims databases were used to identify BD. Adult patients with ≥1 LAI claim from January 1, 2013-June 30, 2014 (ID period) were identified. The first day of LAI initiation was the index date; patients were followed for ≥1 year. Logistic and general linear regression models were used to estimate the risk of hospitalization and associated costs.

RESULTS

Adjusted analyses showed that, in the schizophrenia cohort, risks of hospitalization were statistically significantly higher in the haloperidol [OR (95% CI) = 1.51 (1.05-2.16); HR (95% CI) = 1.35 (1.05-1.73)] and risperidone [OR (95% CI) = 1.58 (1.07-2.33); HR (95% CI) = 1.33 (1.01-1.74)] cohorts than in the aripiprazole once monthly extended release (AOM 400) cohort. Similarly, in patients with BD, risks of hospitalization were significantly higher in haloperidol [OR (95% CI) = 1.49 (1.01-2.19); HR (95% CI) = 1.33 (1.03-1.73)] and risperidone [OR (95% CI) = 1.78 (1.19-2.66); HR (95% CI) = 1.33 (1.01-1.75)] than in AOM400. No statistically significant differences in hospitalization costs were observed in either disease group.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the study results may be subject to confounding variables that are not contained in claims databases, such as disease severity, it appears that AOM400 may be more effective than haloperidol and risperidone LAIs among patients with schizophrenia or BD.