A risk scoring system to predict coronary stent thrombosis

Anticoagulation reduces iliocaval and iliofemoral stent thrombosis in patients with cancer stented for nonthrombotic venous obstruction

OBJECTIVE

To identify factors associated with venous stent thrombosis in patients with cancer treated for nonthrombotic iliocaval or iliofemoral venous obstruction.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of relevant imaging and medical records from 30 consecutive patients with cancer treated at a single center who underwent venous stent placement for nonthrombotic iliocaval or iliofemoral venous obstruction between 2008 and 2018. Follow-up imaging was used to assess stent patency. Variables examined included patient demographics, cancer type, stent characteristics, anticoagulant, and antiplatelet medications and complications of treatment.

RESULTS

Overall primary stent patency was 83% (25/30). The median follow-up period was 44 days (range, 3-365 days). Ten percent of patients occluded owing to in-stent thrombosis and 7% owing to tumor compression of the stent without thrombosis. Therapeutic poststent anticoagulation with enoxaparin, warfarin, or a factor Xa inhibitor was initiated in 87% of the patients. Stent thrombosis occurred in one patient in the anticoagulation group (4%) at 50 days. Stent thrombosis occurred in two patients in the nonanticoagulation group (50%), one at 9 days and the other at 91 days. Anticoagulation was found to be protective against stent thrombosis in this population (hazard ratio, 0.015; P = .011). No statistically significant associations were found among the remaining variables. One patient in the anticoagulation group experienced major bleeding (1/26 [4%]).

CONCLUSIONS

Iliocaval and iliofemoral stent placement for nonthrombotic malignant venous obstruction is safe with favorable primary patency rates. Therapeutic anticoagulation is associated with less stent thrombosis in patients with cancer stented for nonthrombotic iliocaval and iliofemoral venous obstruction.

Annual Incidence of Confirmed Stent Thrombosis and Clinical Predictors in Patients With ACS Treated With Ticagrelor or Prasugrel

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

There is little evidence on rates of stent thrombosis (ST) in patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with ticagrelor or prasugrel. The aim of this study was to analyze the incidence and predictors of ST after an acute coronary syndrome among patients receiving DAPT with ticagrelor vs prasugrel.

METHODS

We used data from the RENAMI registry (REgistry of New Antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute Myocardial Infarction), analyzing a total of 4123 acute coronary syndrome patients discharged with DAPT with ticagrelor or prasugrel in 11 centers in 6 European countries. The endpoint was definite ST within the first year. A competitive risk analysis was carried out using a Fine and Gray regression model, with death being the competitive event.

RESULTS

A total of 2604 patients received DAPT with ticagrelor and 1519 with prasugrel; ST occurred in 41 patients (1.10%), with a similar cumulative incidence between ticagrelor (1.21%) and prasugrel (0.90%). The independent predictors of ST were age (sHR, 1.03; 95%CI, 1.01-1.06), ST segment elevation (sHR, 2.24; 95%CI, 1.22-4.14), previous myocardial infarction (sHR, 2.56; 95%CI, 1.19-5.49), and serum creatinine (sHR, 1.29; 95%CI, 1.08-1.54).

CONCLUSIONS

Stent thrombosis is infrequent in patients receiving DAPT with ticagrelor or prasugrel. The variables associated with an increased risk of ST were advanced age, ST segment elevation, previous myocardial infarction, and serum creatinine.