Relationship between cochlear implant outcome and the diameter of the cochlear nerve depicted on MRI

Investigating the association of electrically-evoked compound action potential thresholds with inner-ear dimensions in pediatric cochlear implantation

OBJECTIVES

A narrow bony cochlear nerve canal (BCNC), as well as a hypoplastic and aplastic cochlear nerve (CN) have been associated with increased electrically-evoked compound action potential (eCAP) thresholds in some studies, suggesting poorer neural excitability in cochlear implantation. Also, in large cochleae the extent of activated spiral ganglion neurons with electrical stimulation is less than in smaller ones. However, a detailed description of the relationship between eCAP thresholds for a lateral-wall electrode array and dimensions of the inner-ear structures and internal auditory canal (IAC) is missing.

DESIGN

The study subjects were 52 pediatric patients with congenital severe-to-profound hearing loss (27 females and 25 males; ages 0.7-2.0 years; 1.0 ± 0.3 years, mean ± SD) implanted bilaterally with Cochlear Nucleus CI422, CI522, or CI622 implants with full insertion of the Slim Straight electrode array. Diameters of the cochlea and the BCNC as well as the widths and heights of the IAC and the CN were evaluated from preoperative computed tomography and magnetic resonance images. These anatomical dimensions were compared with each other and with the patients' intraoperative eCAP thresholds.

RESULTS

The eCAP thresholds increased from the apical to basal direction (r = 0.89, p < 0.001). After sorting the cochleae into four size categories, higher eCAP thresholds were found in larger than in smaller cochleae (p < 0.001). With similar categorization, the eCAP thresholds were higher in cochleae with a larger BCNC than in cochleae with a smaller BCNC (p < 0.001). Neither IAC nor CN cross-sectional areas affected the eCAP thresholds. Correlations were found between cochlea and BCNC diameters and between IAC and CN cross-sectional areas (r = 0.39 and r = 0.48, respectively, p < 0.001 for both).

CONCLUSIONS

In the basal part of the electrode array, higher stimulation levels to elicit measurable neural responses (eCAP thresholds) were required than in the apical part. Increased eCAP thresholds associated with a larger cochlear diameter, but contrary to the earlier studies, not with a small size of the BCNC or the CN. Instead, the BCNC diameter correlated significantly with the cochlea diameter.

High-frequency Cochlear Nerve Deficit Region: Relationship With Deaf Duration and Cochlear Implantation Performance in Postlingual Deaf Adults

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the changes of cochlear nerve diameter and the presence of a cochlear nerve deficit at a high-frequency region and investigate their effects on cochlear implant (CI) performance in postlingual deaf adults.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective.

SETTING

Tertiary care academic center.

PATIENTS

Eighty-three postlingual deaf adults with no labyrinthine anomalies or cognitive deficits who received a CI with perimodiolar electrodes from a single manufacturer.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

We evaluated the changes of cochlear nerve diameter and the presence of a "tail sign," defined as identifiable nerve fibers originating from the far basal turn of the cochlea, which represents the presence of cochlear nerve at a high-frequency region in magnetic resonance imaging, on monosyllabic word recognition scores.

RESULTS

The cochlear nerve diameter showed a positive correlation with word recognition scores (maximum diameter, R2 = 0.26, p < 0.01; minimum diameter, R2 = 0.26, p < 0.01), but a negative correlation with deaf duration. Recipients with a positive tail sign performed better (73 ± 19%) than those without (45 ± 24%, p < 0.01). A positive tail sign was more commonly found in good performers (52 of 62, 84%) than in poor performers (5 of 21, 24%, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Favorable outcomes could be anticipated in postlingual deaf adults with a large cochlear nerve diameter and positive tail sign. A presence of cochlear nerve at a high-frequency region may be an imaging marker for predicting good CI performance.

Correlation of cochlear nerve cross-sectional area and auditory performance after cochlear implantation in prelingual children with bilateral profound hearing loss

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether cochlear nerve (CN) cross-sectional area as measured with parasagittal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in prelingual pediatric deaf patients correlates with auditory performance after cochlear implantation.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective Cohort study.

METHODS

Thirty-two prelingual children with bilateral profound sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) who received unilateral cochlear implant were included in this study. Diameters of CN at Internal auditory canal (IAC) fundus and mid-point of IAC were retrospectively measured on parasagittal images of FIESTA (Fast Imaging Employing Steady-state Acquisition) sequence MRI by two independent observers. Cross-sectional areas [π (Height/2) (Width/2)] were then correlated with post-operative CAPS (Categories of Auditory Performance) and IT-MAIS (Infant-Toddler Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale) scores regularly assessed at 3 monthly intervals post device activation.

RESULTS

The cochlear nerve was identified in all the 32 patients. Mean cross-sectional areas (CSA) of cochlear nerve were 0.71 ± 0.16 mm² at IAC fundus and 0.73 ± 0.18 mm² at mid-point of IAC. The correlation value between CSA at mid-point of IAC and CAPS score at 6 months was 0.271 (p-value- 0.140) and correlation value between CSA at mid-point of IAC and IT-MAIS score at 6 months was 0.282 (p-value- 0.124) which were statistically not significant.

CONCLUSION

There was no significant correlation between the cross-sectional areas of the cochlear nerve on MRI and postoperative auditory scores as measured by CAPS and IT-MAIS scores at six months from the device activation. Hence, we conclude that above an adequate diameter, which can affect the minimum required neurons, the changes in the diameter do not have significant bearing on auditory outcomes after cochlear implantation.

Does size of the cochlear nerve affect postoperative auditory performance in pediatric cochlear implant patients with normal cochlear nerves?

Introduction

Cochlear implantation is an effective treatment method for severe to profound hearing loss. Many factors that may influence cochlear implantation success have been explained in previous studies. Apart from those, minor differences in size of normal cochlear nerves may affect postoperative performance.

Objective

To investigate whether the minor differences in cochlear nerve size in normal cochlear nerves affect postoperative cochlear implant performance.

Methods

30 pediatric prelingually deaf patients who were treated with cochlear implantation were included in this study. From the reconstructed parasagittal magnetic resonance images, the diameter and cross-sectional area of the cochlear nerve on the ipsilateral and contralateral side were measured. Auditory evaluations were performed 1, 3, 6 and 12 months following the first fitting. All the analysis was performed by using EARS®, evaluation of auditory responses to speech tool. Correlation between cochlear nerve diameter, cross-sectional area and postoperative auditory perception was analyzed to determine whether variation in cochlear nerve size contributes to postoperative auditory performance.

Results

The mean diameter of the cochlear nerve on the ipsilateral side was 718.4 μm (504.5 − 904.3 μm) and mean cross sectional area was 0.015 cm² (0.012 − 0.018 cm²). On the contralateral side the mean cochlear nerve diameter was 714.4 μm (502.6 − 951.4 μm) and mean cross sectional area was 0.014 cm² (0.011 − 0.019 cm²). The correlation between the diameter and cross-sectional area of the ipsilateral and contralateral cochlear nerve revealed no significance. Mean score at first month monosyllable-trochee-polysyllable test, MTP1, was 0.17 (0.08 − 0.33), at 6th month with 6 words test, 6th month MTP6 was 0.72 (0.39 − 1.0), at 6th month with 12 words, 6th month MTP 12 was 0.46 (0.17 − 0.75) and at 12th month with 12 words, 12th month MTP12 was 0.73 (0.25 − 1.0). There was no correlation between the monosyllable-trochee-polysyllable test, values at any time with the diameter of the ipsilateral cochlear nerve. However, the first month MTP, 6th month MTP6 and 12th month MTP12 correlated with the cross-sectional area of the ipsilateral cochlear nerve.

Conclusion

Measuring the cross sectional area of the normal- appearing cochlear nerve may give important prognostic knowledge on cochlear implant outcomes. In patients with a larger cross sectional area the auditory performance was better and faster. Although normal appearing, slight differences on cross sectional area of the cochlear nerve may affect performance. Measuring the size of the cochlear nerve on parasagittal magnetic resonance images may provide beneficial information on the postoperative rehabilitation process.

Prognostic factors in cochlear implantation in adults: Determining central process integrity

The purpose of this study is to examine various preoperative factors that can play a role in the auditory rehabilitation outcome of cochlear implant (CI) recipients. In order to determine the level of integrity of central processing preoperatively, special attention was given to residual hearing, duration of deafness, and cochlear nerve diameter as prognostic factors. A cohort of 232 (272 CI implantations) postlingually deafened adults was evaluated in this study. Hearing results at 1, 2 and up to 3 years postoperatively were compared with various preoperative factors: promontory stimulation testing, residual hearing, duration of deafness, and magnetic resonance imaging of the cochlear nerve. Postoperative hearing performance was measured based on the German Freiburg monosyllabic word test and the Oldenburg sentence test. Postoperative hearing performance showed a significant improvement in each consecutive year after implantation. Duration of deafness showed a negative correlation to word recognition and a positive correlation to increased signal-to-noise-ratio in sentence testing. A significant decline in hearing outcome was shown starting around the second decade of deafness corresponding to 66% of life spent in deafness. MR imaging of cochlear nerve diameter shows a positive correlation of larger nerve diameter to better speech understanding. Promontory stimulation testing did not show any prognostic value. In this retrospective review it could be shown that there is an intricate interaction in the preoperative variables: duration of deafness - as well as the ratio of life spent in deafness; residual hearing; and cochlear nerve diameter.

Cochlear Implant Outcomes in Cochlea Nerve Aplasia and Hypoplasia

OBJECTIVE

To assess cochlear implant (CI) outcomes, and factors affecting outcomes, for children with aplasia/ hypoplasia of the cochlea nerve. We also developed a new grading system for the nerves of the internal auditory meatus (IAM) and cochlea nerve classification.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective patient review.

SETTING

Tertiary referral hospital and cochlear implant program.

PATIENTS

Children 0 to 16 years inclusive with a CI who had absent/hypoplastic cochlea nerve on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

INTERVENTION

Cochlear implant.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

MRI, trans-tympanic electrical auditory brainstem response, intraoperative electrical auditory brainstem response, Neural Response Telemetry, Categories of Auditory Perception score, Main mode of communication.

RESULTS

Fifty CI recipients (26 males and 24 females) were identified, 21 had bilateral CIs, 27 had developmental delay. MRI showed cochlea nerve aplasia in 64 ears, hypoplasia in 25 ears, and a normal nerve in 11 ears. Main mode of communication was analyzed for 41 children: 21 (51%) used verbal language (15 speech alone, 5 speech plus some sign, 1 bilingual in speech and sign), and 20 (49%) used sign language (10 sign alone, 9 sign plus some speech, 1 tactile sign). Seventy-three percent of children used some verbal language. Cochlea nerve aplasia/ hypoplasia and developmental delay were both significant factors affecting main mode of communication. Categories of Auditory Performance scores were available for 59 CI ears; 47% with CN Aplasia (IAM nerve grades 0-III) and 89% with CN hypoplasia (IAM nerve grade IV) achieved Categories of Auditory Performance scores of 5 to 7 (some verbal understanding) (p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

Our results are encouraging and useful when counselling families regarding the likelihood of language outcomes and auditory understanding.

Evaluation of cochlear nerve diameter and cross-sectional area in ANSD patients by 3.0-Tesla MRI

CONCLUSIONS

The size of cochlear nerve (CN) is atrophic in adult auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD) patients compared with non-ANSD sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) patients and normal hearing subjects, and CN deficiency is one of the lesions for ANSD patients.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the dimensions of CN in adult ANSD patients on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and confirm the hypothesis that CN deficiency is one of the lesions for ANSD patients.

METHODS

Medical records and MRI of 24 adult ANSD patients reviewed retrospectively and 20 non-ANSD SNHL and 24 volunteers with normal hearing were recruited as control groups. The long diameter (LD), short diameter (SD), and cross-sectional area (CSA) of CN and facial nerve (FN) were measured.

RESULTS

Among the 24 ANSD patients, this study was able to reconstruct and measure the CN of 91.7% (22/24, total 43 ears) of patients and FN of 83.3% (20/24, total 38 ears) of patients. The mean values and standard deviations of LD, SD, and CSA of CN in ANSD patients were 0.65 ± 0.20 mm, 0.44 ± 0.15 mm, and 0.30 ± 0.19 mm(2), respectively. They were significantly smaller in ANSD patients than in control groups (p < 0.001).

Two-microphone spatial filtering provides speech reception benefits for cochlear implant users in difficult acoustic environments

This article introduces and provides an assessment of a spatial-filtering algorithm based on two closely-spaced (∼1 cm) microphones in a behind-the-ear shell. The evaluated spatial-filtering algorithm used fast (∼10 ms) temporal-spectral analysis to determine the location of incoming sounds and to enhance sounds arriving from straight ahead of the listener. Speech reception thresholds (SRTs) were measured for eight cochlear implant (CI) users using consonant and vowel materials under three processing conditions: An omni-directional response, a dipole-directional response, and the spatial-filtering algorithm. The background noise condition used three simultaneous time-reversed speech signals as interferers located at 90°, 180°, and 270°. Results indicated that the spatial-filtering algorithm can provide speech reception benefits of 5.8 to 10.7 dB SRT compared to an omni-directional response in a reverberant room with multiple noise sources. Given the observed SRT benefits, coupled with an efficient design, the proposed algorithm is promising as a CI noise-reduction solution.

Cross-Sectional Vestibular Nerve Analysis in Vestibular Neuritis

Objectives:

We examined the association between the size and cross-sectional area of the superior vestibular nerve as measured on constructive interference in steady-state (CISS) parasagittal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and the vestibular nerve function as measured by electronystagmography.

Methods:

The retrospective observational cohort study took place at an academic tertiary referral center. Twenty-six patients who met established clinical and electronystagmographic criteria for vestibular neuritis and who underwent parasagittal CISS MRI were identified. Two blinded investigators measured vestibular nerve height and width bilaterally at the level of the fundus of the internal auditory canal and calculated the cross-sectional nerve areas. The inter-rater reliability and agreement were analyzed. Symptom duration, age, and gender were also examined.

Results:

A statistically significant decrease was observed in both vestibular nerve cross-sectional area and height as compared to the contralateral vestibular nerve. A non–statistically significant trend was observed for a relative decreased cross-sectional nerve area with increased age, as well as a decrease in nerve area with an increase in symptom duration.

Conclusions:

Decreases in both vestibular nerve cross-sectional area and height are observed in patients with unilateral vestibular neuritis as measured on parasagittal CISS MRI.

MRI brain abnormalities in cochlear implant candidates: how common and how important are they?

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the incidence of abnormal findings on brain MRI in paediatric cochlear implantation candidates.

METHODS

Retrospective review of brain MRI scans of cochlear implant patients between 2000 and 2009 who underwent MRI brain as part of their pre-operative work-up.

RESULTS

MRI scans of 162 patients were reviewed (76 female patients and 86 male patients). The mean age at time of MRI scan was 3 years 8 months. Abnormalities were detected/ reported in 49 patients (30%). The total number of abnormalities detected was 51 (two patients had two separate abnormalities each). Of the abnormalities 82% could be related to known pre-existing conditions. 18% of the abnormalities were incidental/unexpected. Incidental/unexpected abnormalities were found in 9 patients (6%). Four of the patients with incidental abnormalities required referral and further investigations (2.5%). The most common abnormality detected was white matter changes (70%). All the white matter changes were related to pre-existing known medical conditions.

CONCLUSION

At our institution abnormalities detected by pre-operative brain MRI scans on cochlear implant candidates are common (30%). The majority of abnormalities are related to known pre-existing medical conditions. Incidental findings are rare (4%) and approximately half of them required further investigation or referral.

The bony cochlear nerve canal in children with absent or hypoplastic cochlear nerves

OBJECTIVE

To correlate presence and size of the bony cochlear nerve canal [BCNC] with size of the internal auditory meatus [IAM] on CT in children with absent or hypoplastic cochlear nerves [CNs] as compared to age matched controls.

METHODS

This retrospective case-notes review was based in the departments of Cochlear Implantation and Neuroradiology at a tertiary paediatric hospital. Twenty-five ears of fifteen children (subjects) with profound sensorineural deafness (SND) and absent or hypoplastic CN on MRI scan were compared to age matched controls. Two groups of controls were included; a control group of nineteen ears of twelve children with normal hearing or conductive hearing loss [control group 1] and a second control group of twenty one ears of eleven children with severe to profound hearing loss related to GJB2 mutations [control group 2]. Both control groups had evidence of the presence of the CN. Two neuroradiologists independently assessed presence and size of BCNC and IAM on CT and presence of CN on MRI in subjects and controls. The BCNC and IAM size was compared between subjects and both control groups. The presence of BCNC was correlated with the IAM size on CT, presence/absence of CN on MRI and audiological evaluation in subjects.

RESULTS

The mean IAM width was significantly smaller in subjects as compared to controls. The BCNC was absent in 17/25 subject ears and present in all control ears. Absent BCNC correlated with a narrow IAM in 13/17 subject ears. Presence of the BCNC supported presence of a CN although this was not seen on MRI. However, BCNC absence may be associated with presence of a CN as was seen in two subject ears. Five subject ears out of 22 [22%] with absent CN on MRI had other evidence of a present cochlear nerve.

CONCLUSIONS

BCNC is an additional parameter to assess presence of the cochlear branch of the CN. Presence of the BCNC may indicate cochlear nerve presence. Caution should be used in assessing candidacy of cochlear implants based on MRI alone and a combination of imaging and audiological tests should be used to assess presence of the CN.

Differences in Cochlear Nerve Cross-Sectional Area between Normal Hearing and Postlingually Deafened Patients on MRI

Objectives. To demonstrate that parasagittal constructive interference in steady state (CISS) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be used to accurately measure cochlear nerve cross-sectional area and thereby evaluate for statistically significant differences in the cochlear nerve cross-sectional areas of postlingually deafened and normal-hearing adults.

Study Design. Cross-sectional study.

Setting. Tertiary care medical center.

Subjects and Methods. Parasagittal CISS MRIs of postlingually profoundly deafened cochlear implant candidates and normal-hearing patients at a tertiary care academic medical center between 2006 and 2009 were retrospectively identified. Two independent and blinded investigators measured the cochlear nerve height and width and calculated the cross-sectional area [π(H/2)(W/2)] at the fundus of the internal auditory canals. Measurements of both investigators were analyzed for reliability and agreement with an Altman plot, and deafened patient measurements were compared with results of the normal-hearing patients via Wilcoxon rank sum tests.

Results. The cochlear nerve cross-sectional area of postlingually deafened patients (mean ± SD = 0.61 ± 0.16 mm2) was less than normal-hearing patients (0.94 ± 0.28 mm2). The difference was statistically significant ( P = .002). There was good agreement between independent observer measurements.

Conclusion. Parasagittal CISS MRI can be used to measure the cochlear nerve with good interobserver agreement, and there is a significant difference between the cross-sectional area of postlingually deafened and normal-hearing adults. The cross-sectional area may correlate with residual spiral ganglion cells and provide a prognostic indicator for post–cochlear implant performance, which is the focus of our ongoing research.

Preoperative cerebral magnetic resonance imaging and white matter changes in pediatric cochlear implant recipients

INTRODUCTION

Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can yield valuable information regarding the status of the inner ear in pediatric cochlear implant (CI) candidates. Incidentally, cerebral white matter changes are at times noted on these MRI scans. They may indicate post-infectious/postinflammatory changes or progressive neurodegenerative processes.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical significance of cerebral white matter changes in pediatric CI patients.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of pediatric CI recipients with preoperative MRI between March 2004 and January 2009 was performed. MRI reports along with postoperative audiology and speech and language outcomes were assessed.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven patients were included in the study. There were 29 females and 28 males. Mean age was 58 months (range of 12-194 months). Abnormal MRI with varying degrees of white matter changes was noted in 10 (18%) children. Neurological assessments did not reveal any serious central nervous system diseases. Two of the 10 patients demonstrated significant delays and difficulties with postoperative CI performance.

CONCLUSIONS

Cerebral white matter abnormalities are not uncommon incidental findings in preoperative MRI scans in pediatric CI candidates. These changes may reflect remote or active pathology which may require neurological assessment. The significance of these findings is still uncertain and should be better clarified as we study more patients.

Pharmacological Enhancement of Aural Habilitation in Adult Cochlear Implant Users

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this report was to examine the preliminary data collected under a larger on-going feasibility study conducted with cochlear implant patients exploring the potential benefit of pharmacologically-enhanced aural rehabilitation therapy as a means of increasing speech tracking skills.

DESIGN

Eight adult cochlear implant participants participated in a randomized, double-blind study and received either 10 mg d-amphetamine (Treatment group, N = 4) or a placebo (Placebo group, N = 4) 60 minutes prior to a 1.5 hour intensive aural rehabilitation session occurring twice a week for two months. Treatment consisted of a multi-step rehabilitation program individualized for each participant to develop auditory-only speech tracking skills. Prior to and at the conclusion of the therapy sessions, SPECT rCBF imaging and speech tracking assessments were conducted.

RESULTS

Speech tracking scores of the placebo and treatment groups were similar before the aural habilitation intervention. In the placebo group, speech tracking performance increased 13.5% for visual plus auditory and auditory only presentations as a function of aural habilitation alone. The 10 mg d-amphetamine-facilitated program resulted in minimal increases in visual plus auditory tracking scores (2%) but led to a 43% increase for auditory-only speech tracking. Regional cerebral blood flow measures indicated no substantial improvement of brain activation in the placebo group while both the extent and magnitude of primary and associative auditory cortex activations increased significantly with the pharmacologically enhanced treatment program.

CONCLUSIONS

These data support previous studies indicating an accelerated acquisition of speech and language abilities in stroke patients receiving traditional speech therapy in combination with d-amphetamine. Data, however, are preliminary and further study is warranted.