Nutritional assessment and preliminary report on early support of the trauma patient

Effect of early enteral nutrition on outcomes of trauma patients requiring intensive care

PURPOSE

To investigate the effect of early enteral nutrition on outcomes of trauma patients in the intensive care unit (ICU).

METHODS

Clinical data of trauma patients in the ICU of Daping Hospital, China from January 2012 to December 2017 was retrospectively analyzed, including patient age, gender, injury mechanism, injury severity score (ISS), nutritional treatment, postoperative complications (wound infection, abdominal abscess, anastomotic rupture, pneumonia), mortality, and adverse events (nausea, vomiting, abdominal distention). Only adult trauma patients who developed bloodstream infection after surgery for damage control were included. Patients were divided into early enteral nutrition group (<48 h) and delayed enteral nutrition group (control group, >48 h). Data of all trauma patients were collected by the same investigator. Data were expressed as frequency (percentage), mean ± standard deviation (normal distribution), or median (Q₁, Q₃) (non-normal distribution) and analyzed by Chi-square test, Student's t-test, or rank-sum test accordingly. Multiple logistic regression analysis was further adopted to investigate the significant variables with enteral nutrition.

RESULTS

Altogether 876 patients were assessed and 110 were eligible for this study, including 93 males and 17 females, with the mean age of (50.0 ± 15.4) years. Traffic accidents (46 cases, 41.8%) and fall from height (31 cases, 28.2%) were the dominant injury mechanism. There were 68 cases in the early enteral nutrition group and 42 cases in the control group. Comparison of general variables between early enteral nutrition group and control group revealed significant difference regarding surgeries of enterectomy (1.5% vs. 19.0%, p = 0.01), ileum/transverse colon/sigmoid colostomy (4.4% vs. 16.3%, p = 0.01) and operation time (h) (3.2 (1.9, 6.1) vs. 4.2 (1.8, 8.8), p = 0.02). Other variables like ISS (p = 0.31), acute physiology and chronic health evaluation≥20 (p = 0.79), etc. had no obvious difference. Chi-square test showed a much better result in early enteral nutrition group than in control group regarding morality (0 vs. 11.9%, p = 0.03), length of hospital stay (days) (76.8 ± 41.4 vs. 81.4 ± 44.7, p = 0.01) and wound infection (10.3% vs. 26.2%, p = 0.03). Logistic regression analysis showed that the incidence of wound infection was related to the duration required to achieve the enteral nutrition standard (OR = 1.095, p = 0.002). Seventy-six patients (69.1%) achieved the nutritional goal within a week and 105 patients (95.5%) in the end. Trauma patients unable to reach the enteral nutrition target within one week were often combined with abdominal infection, peritonitis, bowel resection, intestinal necrosis, intestinal fistula, or septic shock.

CONCLUSION

Early enteral nutrition for trauma patients in the ICU is correlated with less wound infection, lower mortality, and shorter hospital stay.

Nutrition support in hospitalised adults at nutritional risk

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of disease-related malnutrition in Western European hospitals is estimated to be about 30%. There is no consensus whether poor nutritional status causes poorer clinical outcome or if it is merely associated with it. The intention with all forms of nutrition support is to increase uptake of essential nutrients and improve clinical outcome. Previous reviews have shown conflicting results with regard to the effects of nutrition support.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of nutrition support versus no intervention, treatment as usual, or placebo in hospitalised adults at nutritional risk.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE (Ovid SP), Embase (Ovid SP), LILACS (BIREME), and Science Citation Index Expanded (Web of Science). We also searched the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (www.who.int/ictrp); ClinicalTrials.gov; Turning Research Into Practice (TRIP); Google Scholar; and BIOSIS, as well as relevant bibliographies of review articles and personal files. All searches are current to February 2016.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We include randomised clinical trials, irrespective of publication type, publication date, and language, comparing nutrition support versus control in hospitalised adults at nutritional risk. We exclude trials assessing non-standard nutrition support.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane and the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group. We used trial domains to assess the risks of systematic error (bias). We conducted Trial Sequential Analyses to control for the risks of random errors. We considered a P value of 0.025 or less as statistically significant. We used GRADE methodology. Our primary outcomes were all-cause mortality, serious adverse events, and health-related quality of life.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 244 randomised clinical trials with 28,619 participants that met our inclusion criteria. We considered all trials to be at high risk of bias. Two trials accounted for one-third of all included participants. The included participants were heterogenous with regard to disease (20 different medical specialties). The experimental interventions were parenteral nutrition (86 trials); enteral nutrition (tube-feeding) (80 trials); oral nutrition support (55 trials); mixed experimental intervention (12 trials); general nutrition support (9 trials); and fortified food (2 trials). The control interventions were treatment as usual (122 trials); no intervention (107 trials); and placebo (15 trials). In 204/244 trials, the intervention lasted three days or more.We found no evidence of a difference between nutrition support and control for short-term mortality (end of intervention). The absolute risk was 8.3% across the control groups compared with 7.8% (7.1% to 8.5%) in the intervention groups, based on the risk ratio (RR) of 0.94 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.86 to 1.03, P = 0.16, 21,758 participants, 114 trials, low quality of evidence). We found no evidence of a difference between nutrition support and control for long-term mortality (maximum follow-up). The absolute risk was 13.2% in the control group compared with 12.2% (11.6% to 13%) following nutritional interventions based on a RR of 0.93 (95% CI 0.88 to 0.99, P = 0.03, 23,170 participants, 127 trials, low quality of evidence). Trial Sequential Analysis showed we only had enough information to assess a risk ratio reduction of approximately 10% or more. A risk ratio reduction of 10% or more could be rejected.We found no evidence of a difference between nutrition support and control for short-term serious adverse events. The absolute risk was 9.9% in the control groups versus 9.2% (8.5% to 10%), with nutrition based on the RR of 0.93 (95% CI 0.86 to 1.01, P = 0.07, 22,087 participants, 123 trials, low quality of evidence). At long-term follow-up, the reduction in the risk of serious adverse events was 1.5%, from 15.2% in control groups to 13.8% (12.9% to 14.7%) following nutritional support (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.85 to 0.97, P = 0.004, 23,413 participants, 137 trials, low quality of evidence). However, the Trial Sequential Analysis showed we only had enough information to assess a risk ratio reduction of approximately 10% or more. A risk ratio reduction of 10% or more could be rejected.Trial Sequential Analysis of enteral nutrition alone showed that enteral nutrition might reduce serious adverse events at maximum follow-up in people with different diseases. We could find no beneficial effect of oral nutrition support or parenteral nutrition support on all-cause mortality and serious adverse events in any subgroup.Only 16 trials assessed health-related quality of life. We performed a meta-analysis of two trials reporting EuroQoL utility score at long-term follow-up and found very low quality of evidence for effects of nutritional support on quality of life (mean difference (MD) -0.01, 95% CI -0.03 to 0.01; 3961 participants, two trials). Trial Sequential Analyses showed that we did not have enough information to confirm or reject clinically relevant intervention effects on quality of life.Nutrition support may increase weight at short-term follow-up (MD 1.32 kg, 95% CI 0.65 to 2.00, 5445 participants, 68 trials, very low quality of evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is low-quality evidence for the effects of nutrition support on mortality and serious adverse events. Based on the results of our review, it does not appear to lead to a risk ratio reduction of approximately 10% or more in either all-cause mortality or serious adverse events at short-term and long-term follow-up.There is very low-quality evidence for an increase in weight with nutrition support at the end of treatment in hospitalised adults determined to be at nutritional risk. The effects of nutrition support on all remaining outcomes are unclear.Despite the clinically heterogenous population and the high risk of bias of all included trials, our analyses showed limited signs of statistical heterogeneity. Further trials may be warranted, assessing enteral nutrition (tube-feeding) for different patient groups. Future trials ought to be conducted with low risks of systematic errors and low risks of random errors, and they also ought to assess health-related quality of life.

The effects of early and late feeding on healing of esophageal anastomoses: an experimental study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effects of postoperative late and early feeding on the healing of experimental esophageal anastomosis (EA).

METHODS

Twelve New Zealand rabbits were divided equally into 2 groups: late feeding (LF) and early feeding (EF). A 1-cm-length of the cervical esophagus was resected through a cervical incision, and then anastomosis was performed. The LF group was fed parenterally for 6 days and orally (per oral route) after esophagography on postoperative day 7 as long as there was no esophageal leakage. The EF group was fed orally (per oral route) 24h after esophageal repairs (ERs), and esophagography was carried out on postoperative day 7 to check the ERs. The rabbits were sacrificed to evaluate bursting pressure (BP), diameter of the esophageal lumen (DOTEL), tissue hydroxyproline (HP), and wound healing scores (WHSs) in the anastomosis lines 8 weeks later.

RESULTS

In the LF group, BP and DOTEL were significantly lower than they were in the EF group, and HP was significantly higher than it was in the EF group. WHSs in the LF group were not higher than they were in the EFgroup.

CONCLUSIONS

Early feeding is superior after EA as shown by increased DOTEL and BP levels, but causes decreased HP levels.

Selected pharmacokinetic issues of the use of antiepileptic drugs and parenteral nutrition in critically ill patients

OBJECTIVES

To conduct a systematic review for the evidence supporting or disproving the reality of parenteral nutrition- antiepileptic drugs interaction, especially with respect to the plasma protein-binding of the drug.

METHODS

The articles related to the topic were identified through Medline and PubMed search (1968-Feburary 2010) for English language on the interaction between parenteral nutrition and antiepileptic drugs; the search terms used were anti-epileptic drugs, parenteral nutrition, and/or interaction, and/or in vitro. The search looked for prospective randomized and nonrandomized controlled studies; prospective nonrandomized uncontrolled studies; retrospective studies; case reports; and in vitro studies. Full text of the articles were then traced from the Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM) library subscribed databases, including Wiley-Blackwell Library, Cochrane Library, EBSCOHost, OVID, ScienceDirect, SAGE Premier, Scopus, SpringerLINK, and Wiley InterScience. The articles from journals not listed by USM library were traced through inter library loan.

RESULTS

There were interactions between parenteral nutrition and drugs, including antiepileptics. Several guidelines were designed for the management of illnesses such as traumatic brain injuries or cancer patients, involving the use of parenteral nutrition and antiepileptics. Moreover, many studies demonstrated the in vitro and in vivo parenteral nutrition -drugs interactions, especially with antiepileptics.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no evidence supporting the existence of parenteral nutrition-antiepileptic drugs interaction. The issue has not been studied in formal researches, but several case reports and anecdotes demonstrate this drug-nutrition interaction. However, alteration in the drug-free fraction result from parenteral nutrition-drug (i.e. antiepileptics) interactions may necessitate scrupulous reassessment of drug dosages in patients receiving these therapies. This reassessment may be particularly imperative in certain clinical situations characterized by hypoalbuminemia (e.g., burn patients).

Effects of preoperative flavonoid supplementation on different organ functions in rats

BACKGROUND

Previously it has been reported that preoperative feeding preserves heart function in rats after intestinal ischemia-reperfusion. To further improve postoperative organ function, bioactive nutrition compounds were selected in vitro against the xanthine oxidase radical cascade, an enzyme suggested to play a key role in the induction of single- or multiple-organ dysfunction.

METHODS

Flavonoids were selected in vitro for their capacity to (1) inhibit xanthine oxidase, (2) scavenge superoxide, and (3) scavenge peroxylradicals. The most bioactive flavonoids were added to the preoperative nutrition to study their effect on postintestinal ischemia-reperfusion organ function.

RESULTS

A combination of flavonoids selected on basis of effective flavonoid xanthine oxidase inhibition and superoxide scavenging resulted in increased superoxide scavenging. In vivo, the selected flavonoid mixture significantly lowered postischemic intestinal apoptosis and intestinal oxidative stress indicated by malondialdehyde concentration when compared with ischemia-reperfusion fasted and sham-fasted animals. Moreover, this flavonoid mixture significantly lowered plasma creatinine and urea concentration, both indicating a better postoperative kidney function. Furthermore, oxidative stress measured as this flavonoid mixture when compared with control significantly lowered plasma malondialdehyde concentration in fed rats.

CONCLUSIONS

Coadministration of bioactive flavonoid mixture to preoperative nutrition, in contrast to fasting, attenuates ischemia-reperfusion injury by preserving kidney function in the rat and decreasing apoptosis in the intestine.

Nutrition support of the trauma patient

Hypercatabolism after trauma may lead to acute protein malnutrition, ultimately resulting in multiple organ failure. Nutrition support may prevent this sequence. This review addresses the need for early nutrition support, the preferred route of substrate delivery, and the potential advantages of "immune-enhancing" diets.

Protective effect of early enteral feeding on postburn impairment of liver function and its mechanism in rats

AIM: To study the protective effect of early enteral feeding (EEF) on the postburn impairment of liver function and its mechanism.

METHODS: Wistar rats with 30% of total body surface area (TBSA) full-thickness burn were employed. The effects of EEF on the postburn changes of gastric intramucosal pH, endotoxin levels in portal vein, water contents of hepatic tissue, blood concentrations of tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α), plasma activities of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and asparate amin otransferase (AST), as well as the blood contents of total (TB) and direct bilirubin (DB), total protein (TP) and albumin (ALB) were serially determined within 48 h postburn.

RESULTS: EEF could significantly improve gastric mucosalacidos is, reduce portal vein endotoxin level and water content of hepatic tissue, as w ell as plasma concentrations of TNF-α at all timepoints after seve re burns (P < 0.01); postburn elevation of the plasma activities of ALT, AST and the contents of TB, DB were effectively prevented, whereas the plasma conce ntrations of TP and ALB were markedly increased 24 h and 48 h posturn in EEF group compared with that of the burn without EEF group (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION: EEF has significant beneficial effects on the impro vement of hepatic function in rats after severe burn, and is probably related with an increase in splanchnic blood flow, reduction of the absorption of gut-origin endotoxin and the consequent release of inflammatory mediators.

Early intragastric feeding of seriously burned and long-term ventilated patients: a review of 55 patients

Aims of this retrospective study were: (1) to evaluate the feasibility of a protocol for early intragastric feeding: (2) to examine whether the caloric needs can be provided via the intragastric route within 72 h postburn; (3) to determine the influence of a delayed onset of feeding on the success of the feeding protocol; (4) to evaluate whether delayed feeding has any impact on morbidity and mortality. Fifty-five long-term ventilated patients were enrolled in the study. Their mean age was 37.6 years and mean total body surface area burned 44.2 per cent. The mean duration of ventilation amounted to 24.8 days. Intragastric tube feeding was initiated as early as possible after admission. Forty-five patients (81.8 per cent) could be fed successfully and their caloric needs were met within 72 h. In these patients the mean interval between burn injury and the initiation of tube feeding was 11.5 h. The mean interval was 32.4 h in the 10 patients, demonstrating failure of early intragastric feeding. Only four of the 48 patients who had enteral feeding within 18 h postburn failed to meet the caloric needs. The patients fed successfully showed a significantly decreased mortality. Early intragastric feeding after serious burns can be initiated successfully. A time interval of more than 18 h is unfavourable and significantly decreases the success rate.

Influence of postoperative enteral nutrition on postsurgical infections

BACKGROUND

This study was undertaken to test the hypothesis that early enteral nutrition might reduce the incidence of serious complications after major abdominal surgery.

METHODS

In a randomised double blind prospective trial 30 patients received Nutri-drink and 30 patients received placebo through a nasoduodenal feeding tube. On the day of operation the patients were given median 600 ml of either nutrition or placebo, 60 ml per hour. On the first postoperative day the patients received either 1000 ml (median) of nutrition or placebo, on day 2 1200 ml (median) nutrition, 1400 ml placebo, on day 3 1000 ml (median) nutrition, 1150 ml placebo, and on day 4 1000 ml (median) nutrition, 800 ml placebo. All patients were followed up for 30 days by the same investigator.

RESULTS

The two groups were similar with regard to nutritional status and type of operation. The rate of postoperative infectious complications was significantly lower in the nutrition group, two of 30 compared with 14 of 30 in the placebo group (p = 0.0009).

CONCLUSION

Early enteral nutrition given to patients after major abdominal surgery results in an important reduction in infectious complications.

Immediate enteral nutrition following multisystem trauma: a decade perspective

Metabolic support is an integral component of surgical critical care. Although prompt restoration of oxygen availability is clearly essential, the timing, composition, and route of nutritional support may also be decisive factors. The ensuing discussion will focus on: (a) timing of substrate delivery and (b) route of administration based on our clinical investigation over the past decade. The acutely injured patient was selected as a model of ICU hypermetabolism because of relative homogeneity with respect to age, comorbid factors, and stress level. Our first study hypothesis was that early nutritional support would improve outcome in the severely injured, but previously well-nourished patient. During an 18-month period, all patients undergoing laparotomy with a abdominal trauma index (ATI) greater than 15 were randomized to a control or total enteral nutrition (TEN) group. The control patients were given total parenteral nutrition (TPN) after POD 5, whereas the TEN cohort had a needle catheter jejunostomy (NCJ) inserted at laparotomy and received an elemental diet within 12 hours. The control (n = 31) and TEN (n = 32) groups were otherwise comparable with respect to risk stratification. The TEN patients, of course, shared improved nitrogen balance (p less than 0.001), but also had significantly (p less than 0.025) less septic morbidity. Nine (29%) of the controls developed major infections, contrasted to three (9%) of the TEN patients. Acknowledging the benefit of early nutrition, the next issue we addressed was the optimal route of substrate delivery; i.e., TEN vs TPN. The hypothesis was that TEN, compared to TPN, would reduce the injury stress response as reflected by the prioritization of hepatic protein synthesis. TEN given via NCJ and a nutritionally matched TPN solution were administered during the same postoperative period. Indeed, the TEN patients (n = 23) had significantly (p less than 0.05) higher constitutive proteins and lower acute-phase proteins, whereas the TPN patients manifested the opposite protein profile as measured by crossed immunoelectrophoresis. In view of these findings, we continued the study to ascertain clinical impact. Ultimately, 75 patients were randomized, providing groups with equivalent risk factors. Eleven (37%) of the TPN patients developed septic complications compared to five (17%) of the TEN group, and the incidence of major infection was six (20%) following TPN vs one (3%) with TEN. Thus, immediate TEN provided an additional clinical benefit compared to early TPN in these high-risk surgical patients.

Nutritional support in surgical practice: Part I

Critical evaluation of the therapeutic benefit gained from provision of nutritional support requires knowledge regarding the nutritional status of those to whom it was given. The apparent effect of giving parenteral nutrition or enteral nutrition depends not only on how much and how well it is given, but also on how depleted the recipient is. Thus, nutritional assessment requires close examination before proceeding to assess the efficacy and potential benefits of the remedial measures of parenteral nutrition or enteral nutrition. Although preoperative malnutrition is associated with a poor operative outcome, there appears to be no consensus as to whether perioperative nutritional support can reduce postoperative complications to the level occurring in well-nourished patients undergoing similar procedures. This is partly because reports evaluating the effect of perioperative nutritional support on postoperative outcome vary widely as to numbers of patients studied, primary diagnoses, and the duration and quality of perioperative nutritional support. In Part I, these issues are explored in patients who are undergoing operations for cancer, trauma, or burns. Enteral nutrition appears to be as effective as parenteral nutrition in improving operative outcome, as compared with ad libitum oral nutrition. Postoperative enteral nutrition and parenteral nutrition are equally effective in reducing postoperative complications.

Limited efficacy of early postoperative jejunal feeding

Twenty patients underwent placement of a jejunal catheter for early postoperative feeding at the time of upper abdominal operations, and a control group of 11 patients underwent operative procedures of similar magnitude without jejunostomy. Advancement of the rate of feeding to target intake over 6 to 7 days was attempted. Complications from the feeding led to cessation or curtailment of intake in 65 percent of the patients. Specific complications included abdominal pain and distention, diarrhea, and retrograde reflux of the feeding into the stomach. No statistically significant difference in nitrogen balance was demonstrated between the fed and unfed groups, presumably due to the limitations of nutrient delivery or absorption in the fed groups or elevated breath hydrogen excretion in patients with abdominal pain and distention suggests that the nature of the nutrients, particularly complex carbohydrates, is a factor in the development of feeding complications. Caution must be exercised in advancing the rate of postoperative jejunal feeding.

Mechanism of prevention of postburn hypermetabolism and catabolism by early enteral feeding

This study was performed to investigate the mechanism whereby immediate enteral feeding after burn injury reduces postburn hypermetabolism and hypercatabolism. Fifty-seven burned guinea pigs (30% TBSA) were divided into three groups: A (N = 19), given 175 kcal/kg/day beginning 2 hours after burn; B (N = 20), given 175 kcal/kg/day with an initial 72-hour adaptation period; and C (N = 18), given 200 kcal/kg/day with the same adaptation period as B. Resting metabolic expenditure (RME) on PBD 13 was lowest in group A (109% of preburn level), compared with group B (144%, p less than 0.001) and group C (137%, p less than 0.01). On PBD 1, group A had the greatest jejunal mucosal weight and thickness (p less than 0.001), and mucosal weight had negative correlations with plasma cortisol (r = 0.829, p less than 0.001) and glucagon (r = 0.888, p less than 0.001). Two weeks after burn, urinary vanillyl mandelic acid (VMA) excretion, plasma cortisol, and glucagon were lowest in group A (p less than 0.05 to p less than 0.01). These hormones also significantly correlated with RME (p less than 0.01 to p less than 0.001). These findings suggest that immediate postburn enteral feeding can prevent hypermetabolism via preservation of gut mucosal integrity and prevention of excessive secretion of catabolic hormones.