Medium- and long-chain triglycerides have different effects on the synthesis of tumor necrosis factor by human mononuclear cells in patients under total parenteral nutrition

Dietary supplementation with n-3-fatty acids in patients with pancreatic cancer and cachexia: marine phospholipids versus fish oil - a randomized controlled double-blind trial

BACKGROUND

Like many other cancer patients, most pancreatic carcinoma patients suffer from severe weight loss. As shown in numerous studies with fish oil (FO) supplementation, a minimum daily intake of 1.5 g n-3-fatty acids (n-3-FA) contributes to weight stabilization and improvement of quality of life (QoL) of cancer patients. Given n-3-FA not as triglycerides (FO), but mainly bound to marine phospholipids (MPL), weight stabilization and improvement of QoL has already been seen at much lower doses of n-3-FA (0,3 g), and MPL were much better tolerated. The objective of this double-blind randomized controlled trial was to compare low dose MPL and FO formulations, which had the same n-3-FA amount and composition, on weight and appetite stabilization, global health enhancement (QoL), and plasma FA-profiles in patients suffering from pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

Sixty pancreatic cancer patients were included into the study and randomized to take either FO- or MPL supplementation. Patients were treated with 0.3 g of n-3-fatty acids per day over six weeks. Since the n-3-FA content of FO is usually higher than that of MPL, FO was diluted with 40% of medium chain triglycerides (MCT) to achieve the same capsule size in both intervention groups and therefore assure blinding. Routine blood parameters, lipid profiles, body weight, and appetite were measured before and after intervention. Patient compliance was assessed through a patient diary. Quality of life and nutritional habits were assessed with validated questionnaires (EORTC-QLQ-C30, PAN26). Thirty one patients finalized the study protocol and were analyzed (per-protocol-analysis).

RESULTS

Intervention with low dose n-3-FAs, either as FO or MPL supplementation, resulted in similar and promising weight and appetite stabilization in pancreatic cancer patients. MPL capsules were slightly better tolerated and showed fewer side effects, when compared to FO supplementation.

CONCLUSION

The similar effects between both interventions were unexpected but reliable, since the MPL and FO formulations caused identical increases of n-3-FAs in plasma lipids of included patients after supplementation. The effects of FO with very low n-3-FA content might be explained by the addition of MCT. The results of this study suggest the need for further investigations of marine phospholipids for the improvement of QoL of cancer patients, optionally in combination with MCT.

A Short-Term Long-Chain Triglycerides Infusion Has No Influence on Immune Function of Adult Patients Undergoing Gastrointestinal Surgery

BACKGROUND

Parenteral nutrition (PN) support containing long-chain triglycerides (LCT) plays a critical supportive role in surgical patients' management. This study aims to investigate the effects of intravenous (IV) LCT emulsion on human immune function in adult patients receiving a gastrointestinal surgical procedure.

METHODS

Sixty adult patients were randomly assigned either to the LCT treatment group (n = 32) or to the control group (n = 28). After an abdominal operation, the subjects received PN treatment with or without LCT for 5 days. Neutrophil, peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC), lymphocyte and CD4/CD8, serum immunoglobulin A (IgA), IgG, IgM, complement C3 and C4, interleukin (IL)-2, IL-4, IL-10, IL-12, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, and interferon (IFN)-gamma were measured and statistically analyzed.

RESULTS

The LCT and control groups did not differ significantly at entry in terms of general features. Except for a significant increase of neutrophil number at 24 hours after the surgery in both groups (p < .01), all parameters representing the patients' immune function had no significant difference between the LCT and the control groups with respect to neutrophil and PBMC count, lymphocyte, CD4/CD8, serum IgA, IgG, IgM, complement C3, C4, IL-2, IL-4, IL-10, IL-12, TNF-alpha, and IFN-gamma (p > .05, respectively) 24 hours before the operation, and 24 hours and 120 hours after the operation.

CONCLUSIONS

The regimens of LCT administration may have diverse effects on human immune function in different patient populations. However, LCT emulsion at an appropriate dose and infusion speed does not alter human immune function of adult patients undergoing moderate gastrointestinal surgery.

Safety and efficacy of an olive oil-based triple-chamber bag for parenteral nutrition: a prospective, randomized, multi-center clinical trial in China

Background

Small studies suggest differences in efficacy and safety exist between olive oil-based (OLIVE) and soybean oil-based (SOYBEAN) parenteral nutrition regimens in hospitalized adult patients. This large, prospective, randomized (1:1), open-label, multi-center, noninferiority study compared the delivery, efficacy, and safety of OLIVE (N = 226) with SOYBEAN (N = 232) in Chinese adults (≥18 years) admitted to a surgical service for whom parenteral nutrition was required.

Methods

Treatments were administered for a minimum of 5 days up to 14 days (to achieve approximately 25 kcal/kg/day, 0.9 g/kg/day amino acids, 0.8 g/kg/day lipid). Impact of treatment on anabolic/catabolic and serum inflammatory, chemistry, and hematological markers, safety, and ease of use were assessed. The primary efficacy variable was serum prealbumin level at Day 5.

Results

OLIVE (n = 219) was not inferior to SOYBEAN (n = 224) based on the prealbumin least square geometric mean [LSGM] ratio [95 % CI] 1.12 [1.06, 1.19]; P = 0.002), improved the anabolic/catabolic status of patients enrolled in the study, and was well tolerated compared with SOYBEAN. Improved anabolic status was supported by significantly higher levels of prealbumin at Day 5, albumin at Day 5 and IGF-1 at Day 14 in the OLIVE group, while catabolism was similar between groups. C-reactive protein, intercellular adhesion molecule-1, procalcitonin, and oxidation were similar in each group, but infections were significantly lower with OLIVE (3.6 % versus 10.4 %; P < 0.01).

Conclusions

OLIVE provided effective nutrition, was well tolerated, was associated with fewer infections, and conferred greater ease-of-use than SOYBEAN.

Trial registration

NTC 01579097.

Effects of lipid emulsions in parenteral nutrition of esophageal cancer surgical patients receiving enteral nutrition: a comparative analysis

Background: Olive oil-based lipid emulsion (LE) and medium chain triglyceride/long chain triglyceride (MCT/LCT) emulsion are both LEs with low ω-6 polyunsaturated fat acids (PUFAs) content. However, which one of these LEs is associated with a lower infection risk in patients receiving parenteral nutrition (PN) remains unclear. The aim of the study was to compare the effects of the two LEs in PN in esophageal cancer patients undergoing surgery. Methods: Patients with resectable esophageal carcinoma were recruited and allocated randomly to two groups. The test group was given enteral nutrition (EN) with PN containing olive oil-based LE after tumor resection for ≥7 days, and the patients in the control group were supported by EN with MCT/LCT emulsion-based PN after surgery for the same time period. Immunological markers and inflammatory indicators were tested and perioperative clinical outcomes were determined. The trial was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Register, number ChiCTR-TRC-13003562. 94 Patients were recruited, and grouped (olive oil-based LE, n = 46 and MCT/LCT, n = 48), matched for sex, age, body mass index, histological type, TNM stage, and nutrition risk screening (NRS) 2002 score. Results: There were no differences in perioperative fever (>38 °C), infectious complications, length of hospital stay (>14 days), length of critical care stay (>2 days), time for oral food intake, and in-hospital mortality between the two groups. The test group showed a higher increase in IgG level compared with the MCT/LCT group (p = 0.028). There was no difference in other immunological markers and inflammatory indicators between the two groups. Conclusion: PN containing olive oil-based or MCT/LCT LEs had similar effects on perioperative outcome, cell-mediated immune function and inflammatory response in esophageal cancer patients who had undergone surgery and were receiving EN.

Effects on varying intravenous lipid emulsions on the small bowel epithelium in a mouse model of parenteral nutrition

BACKGROUND

Injectable fat emulsions (FEs) are a clinically dependable source of essential fatty acids (FA). ω-6 FA is associated with an inflammatory response. Medium-chain triglycerides (MCT, ω-3 FA), fish oil, and olive oil are reported to decrease the inflammatory response. However, the effect of these lipids on the gastrointestinal tract has not been well studied. To address this, we used a mouse model of parenteral nutrition (PN) and hypothesized that a decrease in intestinal inflammation would be seen when either fish oil and MCT or olive oil were added.

METHODS

Three FEs were studied in adult C57BL/6 mice via intravenous cannulation: standard soybean-based FE (SBFE), 80% olive oil -supplemented FE (OOFE), or a combination of a soybean oil, MCT, olive oil, and fish oil emulsion (SMOF). PN was given for 7 days, small bowel mucosa-derived cytokines, animal survival rate, epithelial cell (EC) proliferation and apoptosis rates, intestinal barrier function and mucosal FA composition were analyzed.

RESULTS

Compared to the SBFE and SMOF groups, the best survival, highest EC proliferation and lowest EC apoptosis rates were observed in the OOFE group; and associated with the lowest levels of tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin-6, and interleukin-1β expression. Jejunal FA content showed higher levels of eicosapentaenoic and docosapentaenoic acid in the SMOF group and the highest arachidonic acid in the OOFE group.

CONCLUSION

The study showed that PN containing OOFE had beneficial effects to small bowel health and animal survival. Further investigation may help to enhance bowel integrity in patients restricted to PN.

Injectable lipid emulsions-advancements, opportunities and challenges

Injectable lipid emulsions, for decades, have been clinically used as an energy source for hospitalized patients by providing essential fatty acids and vitamins. Recent interest in utilizing lipid emulsions for delivering lipid soluble therapeutic agents, intravenously, has been continuously growing due to the biocompatible nature of the lipid-based delivery systems. Advancements in the area of novel lipids (olive oil and fish oil) have opened a new area for future clinical application of lipid-based injectable delivery systems that may provide a better safety profile over traditionally used long- and medium-chain triglycerides to critically ill patients. Formulation components and process parameters play critical role in the success of lipid injectable emulsions as drug delivery vehicles and hence need to be well integrated in the formulation development strategies. Physico-chemical properties of active therapeutic agents significantly impact pharmacokinetics and tissue disposition following intravenous administration of drug-containing lipid emulsion and hence need special attention while selecting such delivery vehicles. In summary, this review provides a broad overview of recent advancements in the field of novel lipids, opportunities for intravenous drug delivery, and challenges associated with injectable lipid emulsions.

Lipid emulsions in parenteral nutrition of intensive care patients: current thinking and future directions

Background

Energy deficit is a common and serious problem in intensive care units and is associated with increased rates of complications, length of stay, and mortality. Parenteral nutrition (PN), either alone or in combination with enteral nutrition, can improve nutrient delivery to critically ill patients. Lipids provide a key source of calories within PN formulations, preventing or correcting energy deficits and improving outcomes.

Discussion

In this article, we review the role of parenteral lipid emulsions (LEs) in the management of critically ill patients and highlight important biologic activities associated with lipids. Soybean-oil-based LEs with high contents of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) were the first widely used formulations in the intensive care setting. However, they may be associated with increased rates of infection and lipid peroxidation, which can exacerbate oxidative stress. More recently developed parenteral LEs employ partial substitution of soybean oil with oils providing medium-chain triglycerides, ω-9 monounsaturated fatty acids or ω-3 PUFA. Many of these LEs have demonstrated reduced effects on oxidative stress, immune responses, and inflammation. However, the effects of these LEs on clinical outcomes have not been extensively evaluated.

Conclusions

Ongoing research using adequately designed and well-controlled studies that characterize the biologic properties of LEs should assist clinicians in selecting LEs within the critical care setting. Prescription of PN containing LEs should be based on available clinical data, while considering the individual patient’s physiologic profile and therapeutic requirements.

Effect of different lipid emulsions on the immunological function in humans: a systematic review with meta-analysis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Reports regarding the pro- or anti-inflammatory effects of lipid emulsion used in parenteral nutrition are conflicting. Aim was to assess the effect of different intravenous lipid emulsions on immunological function in humans.

METHODS

We performed a computerized bibliographic search, searched reference lists in trial reports, hand-searched journals and contacted experts in the field. Randomized clinical trials evaluating the immunological effects of different parenteral lipid emulsions were included. Three authors independently performed data extraction, statistical processes were performed by two experts. Immunological parameters were classified by two immunologists as marker of improved or worsened immune function. A meta-analysis with standardized effect size estimation was performed for the comparison between long-chain triglycerides vs. glucose or other fat emulsions.

RESULTS

Of 682 assessed studies, 120 compared the immunological effects of intravenously applied lipid emulsions. Of 30 randomized trials, 14 were included in the meta-analysis. None of the lipid regimens showed any clear effect on the evolution of the immunological status or mortality in humans. Length of hospital stay and stay in the intensive care unit could not be evaluated.

CONCLUSION

We found no evidence that lipid emulsions and in particular those containing long-chain triglycerides have an unfavorable effect on immune function.

Parenteral administration of medium- but not long-chain lipid emulsions may increase the risk for infections by Candida albicans

Intravenous administration to volunteers of an emulsion of medium-chain lipids, but not of an emulsion of pure long-chain lipids or a placebo, increased the growth of Candida albicans in serum and modulated Candida-induced cytokine production by mononuclear cells in a way suggesting that medium-chain, but not long-chain, triglycerides increase the risk for infections by Candida.

The metabolic response to intravenous medium-chain triglycerides in infants after surgery

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine if administration of mixed medium-chain triglycerides (MCT)/long chain triglycerides (LCT) fat emulsion would increase net fat oxidation and if carbohydrate intake would influence net fat oxidation.

STUDY DESIGN

Stable infants receiving total parenteral nutrition were studied after surgery. Respiratory gas exchange was measured by indirect calorimetry and urinary nitrogen excretion by the micro-Kjeldahl method. Intravenous fat (4 g/kg/day) was given as either pure LCT fat emulsion or 50/50 MCT/LCT fat emulsion. Carbohydrate intake was either "high" (15 g/kg/day) or "low" (10 g/kg/day). Four groups of patients were studied: group 1 = LCT and high-carbohydrate; group 2 = LCT and low-carbohydrate; group 3 = MCT/LCT and high-carbohydrate; group 4 = MCT/LCT and low-carbohydrate.

RESULTS

At a carbohydrate intake of 15 g/kg/day, the calories available from glucose exceeded the measured resting energy expenditure (REE), and no differences were seen in either energy expenditure or net fat oxidation between patients receiving LCT and MCT/LCT fat emulsions. However, at a carbohydrate intake of 10 g/kg/day, when glucose calories were less than REE, net fat oxidation was significantly higher in patients receiving MCT/LCT (median, 1.94; range, 1.05-2.24 g/kg/day) compared with patients receiving LCT (median, 0.60; range, -0.09 to 1.35; P =.03).

CONCLUSION

Providing that carbohydrate calories do not exceed REE, partial replacement of LCT by MCT in intravenous fat emulsions can increase net fat oxidation in infants after surgery.

Immunonutrition

Nutrition and immunology are interrelated. Several nutrients like arginine, glutamine, omega-3-fatty acids and nucleotides enhance cellular immunity, modulate tumor cell metabolism and improve clinical outcome in stress situations. Glutamine supplementation has been shown to decrease incidence of sepsis and to reduce length of hospital stay in bone marrow transplant patients, low birth weight infants, surgical and multiple trauma patients. Studies with arginine have shown a reduction in infectious complications and lower mortality, however a better understanding of the biology of arginine is needed. Omega-3-fatty acid supplimentation as in fish oil stimulates the immune system. The beneficial effects of immunonutrition in surgical patients has been demonstrated in several studies. It significantly reduces infectious complications and length of hospital stay. In critically ill patients immunonutrition may decrease infectious complications but it is not associated with a mortality advantage. Pediatric experience is limited, but the future is promising.

Effects of parenteral lipid emulsions with different fatty acid composition on immune cell functions in vitro

BACKGROUND

Numerous studies suggest that immune function may be compromised by lipid emulsions rich in polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs). In our study, we compared the effect of a new olive oil-based lipid emulsion (ClinOleic) containing a moderate level of PUFAs, with emulsions based on soybean oil (Intralipid or Ivelip), on immune functions of human cell in vitro.

METHODS

Peripheral white blood cells were collected from healthy volunteers. Lymphocyte proliferation was evaluated by [3H]-thymidine incorporation after stimulation with either phytohemagglutinin (PHA) or antibodies against T-cell specific antigens. Lymphocytes subsets and T-cell activation markers (CD25 and HLA-DR) were measured by flow cytometry. The release of cytokines (interleukin [IL]-2, IL-1beta, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha [TNF-alpha]) was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), after lymphocytes or monocytes/macrophages stimulation with PHA or lipopolysaccharide (LPS).

RESULTS

A significant dose-dependent inhibition of thymidine incorporation was observed with Intralipid and Ivelip (incorporation down to 39.9% of control, p < .001) whereas ClinOleic showed no inhibitory effect. Activation antigen expression on both CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells tended to decrease with Intralipid (CD25: -53.4% on CD4+ and -57.4% on CD8+; HLA-DR: -61.5% on CD4+ and -58.5% on CD8+) but not with ClinOleic (from -2.9% for CD25 on CD4+ to 16.7% for HLA-DR on CD4+). Intralipid decreased significantly IL-2 production (-39.0%, p < .05) whereas ClinOleic had little effect (-13.0%, NS). Intralipid and ClinOleic tended to inhibit to a similar extent the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-alpha: -21.5% and -34.8%, IL-1beta: -45.1% and -40.3%; respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that an olive oil-based lipid emulsion could modulate immune response selectively, maintaining protective immunity and reducing inflammatory response. Olive oil may offer an immunologically neutral alternative to soybean oil for use in parenteral lipid emulsions.

Efficacy of nutritional pharmacology in surgical patients

The present article reviews the current concepts of immune enhancement through nutritional support for the surgical patient as they are derived experimentally and clinically. Although the potential for altering outcome in surgical patients through nutritional enhancement exists, the authors caution against overzealous application of laboratory data in the clinical arena. Available clinical studies have, at best, only demonstrated modest benefits. It is appropriate that the current literature be critically reviewed to assess the efficacy of the agent(s) purported to be of clinical benefit. Although present reports of immune-enhancing nutrition regimens demonstrate no overwhelming benefits in the critically ill or immunocompromised patient, the pursuit of this science remains undaunted. Lessons learned from the past are leading to reinvestigations in the laboratory, as well as better designs of clinical trials that are free of distracting post-hoc analysis and performed clearly in an intention-to-treat manner.

Parenteral use of medium-chain triglycerides: a reappraisal

Over the last two decades, the clinical use of intravenous fat emulsions for the nutritional support of hospitalized patients has become routine. During this time long-chain triglycerides (LCT) derived from soybean and/or safflower oils were the exclusive lipid source for these emulsions, providing both a safe calorically dense alternative to dextrose and essential fatty acids needed for biologic membranes and the maintenance of immune function. During the past decade, the availability of novel experimental triglycerides for parenteral use has generated interest in the use of these substrates for nutritional and metabolic support. Medium-chain triglycerides (MCT), long advocated as a superior substrate for parenteral use, possess many unique physiochemical and metabolic properties that make them theoretically advantageous over their LCT counterparts. Although not yet approved in the United States, preparations containing MCT have been widely available in Europe. Intravenous MCT preparations, either as physical mixtures or structured lipids, have been used clinically in patients with immunosuppresion, critical illness, liver and pulmonary disease and in premature infants. Despite great promise, the clinical data comparing the efficacy of MCT-based lipid emulsions to their LCT counterparts has been equivocal. This may be due in part to the limited nature of the published clinical trials. Measures of efficacy for parenteral or enteral nutritional products has taken on new meaning, in light of the reported experience using immunomodulatory nutrients. Current concerns about cost of medical care and resource use warrant careful deliberation about the utility of any new and expensive therapy. Until clinical data can fulfill expectations derived from animal studies, it is difficult to advocate the general use of MCT-based lipid emulsions. Future clinical studies with MCT-based emulsions should have clear outcome objectives sufficient to prove their theorized metabolic superiority.

Nutrition support affects the distribution and organ uptake of cachectin/tumor necrosis factor in rats

BACKGROUND

We have previously observed a potentiation of the metabolic response to cachectin/tumor necrosis factor (TNF) by total parenteral nutrition (TPN) but not in anorexic orally fed animals. We hypothesized that nutritional status might affect TNF clearance kinetics.

METHODS

We compared the clearance of a bolus of labeled TNF in TPN-fed animals given sufficient nutrients to grow called weight-gaining rats (WGR) with those given 50% of the WGR called weight-losing rats (WLR) and with orally fed rats (OFR). Data were analyzed using a two-compartment open system model and by linear systems analysis.

RESULTS

The data from both types of analysis indicator that although metabolic clearance was similar, WGR had a slower fractional TNF clearance rate (FCR) as well as a larger volume of distribution than WLR or OFR. Further analysis showed that an increased proportion of the total mass of TNF resided in a plasma-associated compartment in WGR compared with WLR and OFR. In addition, WGR had reduced uptake of labeled TNF by the kidney.

CONCLUSION

The data suggest that nutrition support influences either the distribution of TNF or the FCR, resulting in a greater retention in the plasma-associated compartment with intact absolute removal rates. This study has important implications concerning the type of nutrition support provided to the critically ill patient because our data suggest that clinical states with increased circulating TNF levels may be adversely affected by currently available nutritional practices.