An exploratory path model of the relationships between positive and negative adaptation to cancer on quality of life among non-Hodgkin lymphoma survivors

Exploring health-related quality of life among non-Hodgkin's lymphoma survivors after completion of primary treatment: a cross-sectional study in Thailand

PURPOSES

To investigate health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) and its influencing factors among non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) survivors after completion of primary treatment.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study with 312 NHL survivors after completing primary treatment using self-reported data collected through face-to-face interviews or postal survey between May 2019 and December 2019. Sociodemographic factors, clinical characteristics, physical symptom distress, anxiety, depression, unmet supportive care needs, and adaptation (post-traumatic growth and post-traumatic stress disorder) were assessed. Data analysis included ANOVA tests to investigate HR-QoL among NHL survivors at different time points and GEE to assess predictors of HR-QoL.

RESULTS

The mean score of HR-QoL was 136.05 (SD 19.12). HR-QoL scores reported by NHL survivors in phase I (6 months or less post-treatment) were significantly lower than those in phase II (> 6 months-4 years), phase III (> 4-9 years), and phase IV (over 9 years post-treatment). Regarding HR-QoL domains, NHL survivors in phase I had significantly lower physical well-being and functional well-being scores than those in phases II, III, and IV; and significantly lower lymphoma domain score than those in phase III. GEE analysis showed that physical symptom distress, anxiety, depression, unmet supportive care needs, poor adaptation, and receiving chemotherapy disrupted HR-QoL (all P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Healthcare providers should re-prioritize intervention guidelines and survivorship care planning to promote HR-QoL among NHL survivors, particularly in phase I, through reducing physical and psychological symptom distress, addressing unmet needs, and enhancing adaptation outcomes.

Measuring quality of life in people living with and beyond cancer in the UK

Purpose

The aim of this study was to identify the most appropriate measure of quality of life (QoL) for patients living with and beyond cancer.

Methods

One hundred eighty-two people attending cancer clinics in Central London at various stages post-treatment, completed a series of QoL measures: FACT-G, EORTC QLQ-C30 , IOCv2 (positive and negative subscales) and WEMWBS, a wellbeing measure. These measures were chosen as the commonest measures used in previous research. Correlation tests were used to assess the association between scales. Participants were also asked about pertinence and ease of completion.

Results

There was a significant positive correlation between the four domain scores of the two health-related QoL measures (.32 ≤ r ≤ .72, P < .001), and a significant large negative correlation between these and the negative IOCv2 subscale scores (− .39 ≤ r ≤ − .63, P < .001). There was a significant moderate positive correlation between positive IOCv2 subscale and WEMWBS scores (r = .35, P < .001). However, neither the FACT-G nor the EORTC showed any significant correlation with the positive IOCv2 subscale. Participants rated all measures similarly with regards to pertinence and ease of use.

Conclusion

There was little to choose between FACT-G, EORTC, and the negative IOC scales, any of which may be used to measure QoL. However, the two IOCv2 subscales capture unique aspects of QoL compared to the other measures. The IOCv2 can be used to identify those cancer survivors who would benefit from interventions to improve their QoL and to target specific needs thereby providing more holistic and personalised care beyond cancer treatment.

The Role of Cognitive Appraisal in Quality of Life Over Time in Patients With Cancer

OBJECTIVES

To better understand how personal factors, contextual factors, and cognitive appraisals predict quality of life.

SAMPLE & SETTING

81 patients with a new diagnosis of cancer were recruited from two oncologists' offices in the midwestern United States.

METHODS & VARIABLES

A longitudinal design was used to collect data at three time points.

RESULTS

Individuals identified a variety of primary appraisals at the same time and more consistently identified their cancer as a challenge rather than a harm/loss or a threat. The greatest variation in appraisals and quality of life occurred about six months after diagnosis. Hierarchical regression analyses demonstrated that age and primary and secondary appraisals explained a significant amount of variance in quality of life at all three time points.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING

Interventions to improve quality of life for individuals newly diagnosed with cancer are needed and may be more helpful if they target cognitive appraisals. Nurses should assess what matters to the individual; it is important to evaluate how each person appraises a cancer diagnosis so providers can support coping and adjustment from diagnosis through individual treatment trajectories.

Positive Psychological Constructs and Health Outcomes in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Patients: A Systematic Review

Positive psychological constructs (eg, optimism, positive affect) have been independently associated with superior health outcomes across many medical populations. However, there has been little synthesis of the literature examining these associations among patients with hematologic malignancies receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). To address this gap we completed a systematic review, using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, of studies examining relationships between positive psychological constructs and health-related outcomes (eg, psychiatric symptoms, function, health-related quality of life [HRQoL], or treatment compliance) after HSCT. Eighteen eligible studies (N = 4201; 47% women; mean age, 47.1) were identified. Optimism (n = 12 studies) was the most frequently studied positive construct and HRQoL (examined in n = 11 studies) the most common outcome. All 17 studies with quantitative analyses found a significant (P < .05) association between a positive psychological construct and a health outcome; most but not all controlled for 1 or more relevant covariates. Among patients with hematologic malignancies who receive HSCT, positive psychological constructs appear to be associated with improved HRQoL and other health outcomes. Further work is warranted to more comprehensively understand the independent effects of positive psychological constructs on a variety of health outcomes and to develop interventions to promote well-being that are adapted to the needs of this population.