Pharmacological interventions for preventing acute mountain sickness: a network meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized clinical trials

Intermittent hypoxia training effectively protects against cognitive decline caused by acute hypoxia exposure

Intermittent hypoxia training (IHT) is a promising approach that has been used to induce acclimatization to hypoxia and subsequently lower the risk of developing acute mountain sickness (AMS). However, the effects of IHT on cognitive and cerebrovascular function after acute hypoxia exposure have not been characterized. In the present study, we first confirmed that the simplified IHT paradigm was effective at relieving AMS at 4300 m. Second, we found that IHT improved participants' cognitive and neural alterations when they were exposed to hypoxia. Specifically, impaired working memory performance, decreased conflict control function, impaired cognitive control, and aggravated mental fatigue induced by acute hypoxia exposure were significantly alleviated in the IHT group. Furthermore, a reversal of brain swelling induced by acute hypoxia exposure was visualized in the IHT group using magnetic resonance imaging. An increase in cerebral blood flow (CBF) was observed in multiple brain regions of the IHT group after hypoxia exposure as compared with the control group. Based on these findings, the simplified IHT paradigm might facilitate hypoxia acclimatization, alleviate AMS symptoms, and increase CBF in multiple brain regions, thus ameliorating brain swelling and cognitive dysfunction.

Efficacy of acetazolamide for the prophylaxis of acute mountain sickness: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis of randomized clinical trials

BACKGROUND

Acute mountain sickness (AMS) is a benign and self-limiting syndrome, but can progress to life-threatening conditions if leave untreated. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of acetazolamide for the prophylaxis of AMS, and disclose factors that affect the treatment effect of acetazolamide.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials comparing the use of acetazolamide versus placebo for the prevention of AMS were included. The incidence of AMS was our primary endpoint. Meta-regression analysis was conducted to explore factors that associated with acetazolamide efficacy. Trial sequential analyses were conducted to estimate the statistical power of the available data.

RESULTS

A total of 22 trials were included. Acetazolamide at 125, 250, and 375 mg/bid significantly reduced incidence of AMS compared to placebo. TAS indicated that the current evidence was adequate confirming the efficacy of acetazolamide at 125, 250, and 375 mg/bid in lowering incidence of AMS. There was no evidence of an association between efficacy and dose of acetazolamide, timing at start of acetazolamide treatment, mode of ascent, AMS assessment score, timing of AMS assessment, baseline altitude, and endpoint altitude.

CONCLUSION

Acetazolamide is effective prophylaxis for the prevention of AMS at 125, 250, and 375 mg/bid. Future investigation should focus on personal characteristics, disclosing the correlation between acetazolamide efficacy and body mass, height, degree of prior acclimatization, individual inborn susceptibility, and history of AMS.

Efficacy of Acetazolamide for the Prophylaxis of Acute Mountain Sickness: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

BACKGROUND

Acute mountain sickness (AMS) is a benign and self-limiting syndrome but can progress to life-threatening conditions if leave untreated. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of acetazolamide for the prophylaxis of AMS and disclose potential factors that affect the treatment effect of acetazolamide.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Randomized controlled trials comparing the use of acetazolamide versus placebo for the prevention of AMS were included. The incidence of AMS was the primary endpoint. Meta-regression analysis was conducted to explore potential factors associated with acetazolamide efficacy. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was conducted to estimate the statistical power of the available data.

RESULTS

A total of 22 trials were included. Acetazolamide at 125, 250, and 375 mg/ twice daily (bid) significantly reduced incidence of AMS compared to placebo. TAS indicated that the current evidence was adequate confirming the efficacy of acetazolamide at 125, 250, and 375 mg/bid in lowering incidence of AMS. There was no evidence of an association between efficacy and dose of acetazolamide, timing at start of acetazolamide treatment, mode of ascent, AMS assessment score, timing of AMS assessment, baseline altitude, and endpoint altitude.

CONCLUSION

Acetazolamide is effective prophylaxis for the prevention of AMS in doses of 125, 250, and 375 mg/bid. Future investigations should focus on personal characteristics, disclosing the correlation between acetazolamide efficacy and body mass, height, degree of prior acclimatization, individual inborn susceptibility, and history of AMS.

Altitude, Acute Mountain Sickness, and Acetazolamide: Recommendations for Rapid Ascent

Toussaint, Claudia M., Robert W. Kenefick, Frank A. Petrassi, Stephen R. Muza, and Nisha Charkoudian. Altitude, acute mountain sickness, and acetazolamide: recommendations for rapid ascent. High Alt Med Biol. 22:5-13, 2021. Background: Sea level natives ascending rapidly to altitudes above 1,500 m often develop acute mountain sickness (AMS), including nausea, headaches, fatigue, and lightheadedness. Acetazolamide (AZ), a carbonic anhydrase inhibitor, is a commonly used medication for the prevention and treatment of AMS. However, there is continued debate about appropriate dosing, particularly when considering rapid and physically demanding ascents to elevations above 3,500 m by emergency medical and military personnel. Aims: Our goal in the present analysis was to evaluate and synthesize the current literature regarding the use of AZ to determine the most effective dosing for prophylaxis and treatment of AMS for rapid ascents to elevations >3,500 m. These circumstances are specifically relevant to military and emergency medical personnel who often need to ascend rapidly and perform physically demanding tasks upon arrival at altitude. Methods: We conducted a literature search from April 2018 to February 2020 using PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science to identify randomized controlled trials that compared AZ with placebo or other treatment with the primary endpoint of AMS incidence and severity. We included only research articles/studies that focused on evaluation of AZ use during rapid ascent. Results: Four doses of AZ (125, 250, 500, and 750 mg daily) were identified as efficacious in decreasing the incidence and/or severity of AMS during rapid ascents, with evidence of enhanced effectiveness with higher doses. Conclusions: For military, emergency medical, or other activities involving rapid ascent to altitudes >3,500 m, doses 500-750 mg/day within 24 hours of altitude exposure appear to be the most effective for minimizing symptoms of AMS.

Inhaled budesonide for the prevention of acute mountain sickness: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Altitude induces acute mountain sickness (AMS), which can affect the health or limit the activities of 15 -80% of climbers and workers. Budesonide has been applied to prevent AMS. However, its prophylactic efficacy is controversial. Our purpose was to conduct a meta-analysis to assess whether budesonide qualifies as a prophylaxis for AMS.

METHODS

A literature search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library in February 2019. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were selected. The main outcome, AMS, was estimated with the relative risk (RR), weighted mean difference (WMD), and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). The statistical analysis was performed using Rev. Man 5.3.

RESULTS

Five groups in six articles met the eligibility criteria with 304 participants, including two articles with the same participants but different measurements. Inhaled budesonide showed a potential trend towards preventing AMS, but it was not statistically significant (RR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.41-1.13, p = 0.14). The subgroup analysis based on dosage (200 µg) did not have significant results. A similar trend was observed for severe AMS and in subgroups stratified by the Lake Louise Score (LLC). However, there was a significant improvement in heart rate (HR) (WMD = -5.41, 95% CI: -8.26 to -2.55, p = 0.0002) and pulse oxygen saturation (SPO2) (WMD = 2.36, 95% CI: 1.62-3.1, p < 0.00001) in the group with inhaled budesonide. Additionally, no side effects were reported in any included study.

CONCLUSION

The current meta-analysis indicates that inhaled budesonide does not protect against AMS or severe AMS. However, it is successful at reducing HR and increasing SPO₂ without any side effects.

Increased Cytokines at High Altitude: Lack of Effect of Ibuprofen on Acute Mountain Sickness, Physiological Variables, or Cytokine Levels

Lundeberg, Jenny, John R. Feiner, Andrew Schober, Jeffrey W. Sall, Helge Eilers, and Philip E. Bickler. Increased cytokines at high altitude: lack of effect of ibuprofen on acute mountain sickness, physiological variables or cytokine levels. High Alt Med Biol. 19:249-258, 2018.

INTRODUCTION

There is no consensus on the role of inflammation in high-altitude acclimatization.

AIMS

To determine the effects of a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (ibuprofen 400 mg every 8 hours) on blood cytokines, acclimatization, acute mountain sickness (AMS, Lake Louise Score), and noninvasive oxygenation in brain and muscle in healthy volunteers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this double-blind study, 20 volunteers were randomized to receive ibuprofen or placebo at sea level and for 48 hours at 3800 m altitude. Arterial, brain, and leg muscle saturation with near infrared spectroscopy, pulse oximetry, and heart rate were measured. Blood samples were collected for cytokine levels and cytokine gene expression.

RESULTS

All of the placebo subjects and 8 of 11 ibuprofen subjects developed AMS at altitude (p = 0.22, comparing placebo and ibuprofen). On arrival at altitude, the oxygen saturation as measured by pulse oximetry (S_pO₂) was 84.5% ± 5.4% (mean ± standard deviation). Increase in blood interleukin-1β (IL-1β), interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-8 (IL-8), interleukin-10 (IL-10), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) levels occurred comparably in the placebo and ibuprofen groups (all not significant, univariate test by Wilcoxon rank sum). Increased IL-6 was associated with higher AMS scores (p = 0.002 by Spearman rank correlation). However, we found no difference or association in AMS score and blood or tissue oxygenation between the ibuprofen and placebo groups.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that ibuprofen, at the package-recommended adult dose, did not have a significant effect on altitude-related increases in cytokines, AMS scores, blood, or tissue oxygenation in a population of healthy subjects with a high incidence of AMS.