Hormone replacement therapy and arterial blood pressure in postmenopausal women with hypertension

Impact of puberty, sex determinants and chronic inflammation on cardiovascular risk in young people

Worrying trends of increased cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in children, adolescents and young people in the Modern Era have channelled research and public health strategies to tackle this growing epidemic. However, there are still controversies related to the dynamic of the impact of sex, age and puberty on this risk and on cardiovascular health outcomes later in life. In this comprehensive review of current literature, we examine the relationship between puberty, sex determinants and various traditional CVD-risk factors, as well as subclinical atherosclerosis in young people in general population. In addition, we evaluate the role of chronic inflammation, sex hormone therapy and health-risk behaviours on augmenting traditional CVD-risk factors and health outcomes, ultimately aiming to determine whether tailored management strategies for this age group are justified.

The association of hormone therapy with blood pressure control in postmenopausal women with hypertension: a secondary analysis of the Women's Health Initiative clinical trials

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to assess the effect of menopausal hormone therapy (HT) on blood pressure control in postmenopausal women with hypertension.

METHODS

The Women's Health Initiative HT clinical trials were double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled studies of women aged 50 to 79 years testing the effects of HT (conjugated equine estrogens [CEE, 0.625 mg/d] or CEE + medroxyprogesterone acetate [MPA; 2.5 mg/d]) on risks for coronary heart disease and invasive breast cancer, the primary outcomes for efficacy and safety, respectively. This secondary analysis of the Women's Health Initiative HT trials examined a subsample of 9,332 women with hypertension (reported ever taking pills to treat hypertension or were taking antihypertensive medication) at baseline. Blood pressure was measured at baseline and up to 10 annual follow-up visits during the planned study phase. Antihypertensive medications were inventoried at baseline and years 1, 3, 6, and 9 during the study, and self-reported during extended follow-up: 2009-2010 and 2012-2013, which occurred median of 13 and 16 years after randomization, respectively. The intervention effect was estimated through year 6. Cumulative follow-up included all visits.

RESULTS

Compared with placebo, CEE-alone had significantly ( P = 0.02) higher systolic blood pressure (SBP) by mean (95% confidene interval [CI]) = 0.9 (0.2-1.5) mm Hg during the intervention phase. For cumulative follow-up, the CEE arm was associated with increased SBP by mean (95% CI) = 0.8 (0.1-1.4) mm Hg ( P = 0.02). Furthermore, CEE + MPA relative to placebo was associated with increased SBP by mean (95% CI) = 1.8 (1.2-2.5) mm Hg during the intervention phase ( P < 0.001). For cumulative follow-up, the CEE + MPA arm was associated with increased SBP by mean (95% CI) = 1.6 (1.0-2.3) mm Hg ( P < 0.001). The mean number of antihypertensive medications taken at each follow-up visit did not differ between randomization groups during the intervention or long-term extended follow-up of 16 years.

CONCLUSION

There was a small but statistically significant increase in SBP in both CEE-alone and CEE + MPA arms compared with placebo during both the intervention and cumulative follow-up phases among postmenopausal women with hypertension at baseline. However, this increase in SBP was not associated with an increased antihypertensive medication use over time among women randomized to HT compared with placebo.

The effect of hormone therapy on mean blood pressure and visit-to-visit blood pressure variability in postmenopausal women: results from the Women's Health Initiative randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVES

Mean and visit-to-visit variability (VVV) of blood pressure (BP) are associated with an increased cardiovascular disease risk. We examined the effect of hormone therapy on mean and VVV of BP in postmenopausal women from the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) randomized controlled trials.

METHODS

BP was measured at baseline and annually in the two WHI hormone therapy trials, in which 10 739 and 16 608 postmenopausal women were randomized to conjugated equine estrogens (CEEs, 0.625 mg/day) or placebo, and CEEs and medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA, 2.5 mg/day) or placebo, respectively.

RESULTS

At the first annual visit (year 1), mean SBP was 1.04 mmHg [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.58, 1.50] and 1.35 mmHg (95% CI 0.99, 1.72) higher in the CEEs and CEEs and MPA arms, respectively, compared with the corresponding placebos. These effects remained stable after year 1. CEEs also increased the VVV of SBP (ratio of VVV in CEEs vs. placebo, 1.03; P < 0.001), whereas CEEs and MPA did not (ratio of VVV in CEEs and MPA vs. placebo, 1.01; P = 0.20). After accounting for study drug adherence, the effects of CEEs and CEEs and MPA on mean SBP increased at year 1, and the differences in the CEEs and CEEs and MPA arms vs. placebos also continued to increase after year 1. Further, both CEEs and CEEs and MPA significantly increased the VVV of SBP (ratio of VVV in CEEs vs. placebo, 1.04; P < 0.001; ratio of VVV in CEEs and MPA vs. placebo, 1.05; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Among postmenopausal women, CEEs and CEEs and MPA at conventional doses increased mean and VVV of SBP.

Menopausal hormone therapy: examining cardiovascular and clinical impacts of treatment

Postmenopausal women have reduced levels of female sex hormones and this may play a significant role in the onset of cardiovascular disease. Menopausal hormone therapy (MHT), which is primarily prescribed for the treatment of perimenopausal symptoms, has been associated with risk of coronary heart disease, hypertension and stroke in women. This review will summarize the outcomes of observational studies and randomized clinical trials that have investigated the influence of MHT use on the cardiovascular system. In addition, it will explore how the timing of MHT prescription relative to menopause, dosage and route of administration may alter the impact of MHT on cardiovascular health.

Menopausal hormone therapy is associated with having high blood pressure in postmenopausal women: observational cohort study

BACKGROUND

The relationship between menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) and cardiovascular risk remains controversial, with a number of studies advocating the use of MHT in reducing risk of cardiovascular diseases, while others have shown it to increase risk. The aim of this study was to determine the association between menopausal hormone therapy and high blood pressure.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

A total of 43,405 postmenopausal women were included in the study. Baseline data for these women were sourced from the 45 and Up Study, Australia, a large scale study of healthy ageing. These women reported being postmenopausal, having an intact uterus, and had not been diagnosed with high blood pressure prior to menopause. Odds ratios for the association between MHT use and having high blood pressure were estimated using logistic regression, stratified by age (<56 years, 56-61 years, 62-70 years and over 71 years) and adjusted for demographic and lifestyle factors. MHT use was associated with higher odds of having high blood pressure: past menopausal hormone therapy use: <56 years (adjusted odds ratio 1.59, 99% confidence interval 1.15 to 2.20); 56-61 years (1.58, 1.31 to 1.90); 62-70 years (1.26, 1.10 to 1.44). Increased duration of hormone use was associated with higher odds of having high blood pressure, with the effect of hormone therapy use diminishing with increasing age.

CONCLUSIONS

Menopausal hormone therapy use is associated with significantly higher odds of having high blood pressure, and the odds increase with increased duration of use. High blood pressure should be conveyed as a health risk for people considering MHT use.

Management of hypertension in women

A gender-specific approach to cardiovascular (CV) diseases has been practiced for decades, although not always to the advantage of women. Based on population data showing that women are at lower risk for CV events than men female gender has generally been regarded as a protective factor for CV disease. Unfortunately, CV risk assessment has therefore received less attention in women. Despite the lower absolute risk of CV events in women compared with age-matched men, the majority of women die from CV diseases. In absolute numbers, since 1984, more women than men died of CV disease each year. Most CV events occur in women with known traditional CV risk factors. Improving risk factor management in women of all ages therefore yields an enormous potential to reduce CV morbidity and mortality in the population. Aside from smoking cessation, hypertension (HTN) control is the single most important intervention to reduce the risk of future CV events in women. This review highlights peculiarities of HTN as they pertain to women, and points out where diagnosis and management of HTN may require a gender-specific focus.

Comparative effects of conventional vs. novel hormone replacement therapy on blood pressure in postmenopausal women

Menopause is commonly characterized by an increase in blood pressure. Higher blood pressure may partially explain the elevated risk for cardiovascular events observed in postmenopausal women. There is a graded relationship between blood pressure and cardiovascular risk which extends to levels of blood pressure well below 140/90 mmHg, the classical established blood pressure limit for the diagnosis of hypertension. Despite this knowledge and the wide availability of consensus treatment guidelines for hypertension, high blood pressure remains untreated or poorly treated in many postmenopausal patients. It is clear that novel and innovative population strategies for lowering blood pressure in postmenopausal women are warranted. Clinical trials suggest that oral estrogen administration may produce either a neutral effect or a small increase in blood pressure in postmenopausal women. Transdermal estrogen administration has not been studied as extensively but may produce a decrease in blood pressure. The mechanisms for the differences observed between oral and transdermal estrogen have not been completely elucidated. Drospirenone (DRSP) is a novel progestin with aldosterone receptor antagonist activity that has been developed for hormone therapy as DRSP/17beta-estradiol (DRSP/E2). In several clinical trials, DRSP/E2 has demonstrated a significant antihypertensive effect as well an additive effect when combined with existing antihypertensive therapy. Despite the wide availability of treatment guidelines, a wide array of antihypertensive agents, and the introduction of hormone replacement therapy that can lower blood pressure, optimizing blood pressure control remains a serious issue confronting the physician who cares for the postmenopausal woman.

Effects of blood pressure reduction on cardiovascular risk estimates in hypertensive postmenopausal women

Menopause is accompanied by an increased prevalence of hypertension, which may partially explain the corresponding cardiovascular risk observed in postmenopausal women. The relationship between blood pressure and cardiovascular risk is continuous, consistent and independent of other risk factors. There are profound benefits of treating hypertension: antihypertensive therapy has been associated with large reductions in stroke, myocardial infarction and heart failure. Despite these proven benefits, hypertension is inadequately treated, or not treated at all, in the majority of patients. There has been concern regarding the use of hormone therapy in hypertensive postmenopausal women. Drospirenone/17beta-estradiol, a hormone therapy, has been demonstrated to lower blood pressure in hypertensive postmenopausal women either alone or when administered simultaneously with antihypertensive drugs. This might offer a potential advantage in patients with elevated blood pressure. It is also known that the risk for target organ events extends to levels well below the established definition of 140/90 mmHg. High-normal blood pressure carries an increased cardiovascular risk when compared to lower levels of blood pressure. Identification and management of elevated blood pressure are an important component of the successful management of the postmenopausal woman and can help prevent the untoward consequences of elevated blood pressure.

Does hormone replacement therapy affect the use of prescription medicines in postmenopausal women: experience from the Estonian Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy Trial [ISRCTN35338757]

OBJECTIVE

To determine how postmenopausal hormone therapy (HRT) is related to the use of other prescription medication.

DESIGN

Follow up of a randomised controlled trial with a blind subtrial of hormone therapy versus placebo and a nonblind subtrial of open label hormone therapy versus nontreatment.

POPULATION

A total of 1823 postmenopausal women aged 50-64 at the time of sampling participated in the trial from 1999 to 2004.

METHODS

Use of prescription medication was identified by records in the central computerised database of the Estonian Health Insurance Fund.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The use of 21 classes of prescription medication was compared in the hormone therapy arms and placebo or nontreatment trial arms. The influence of women's socio-economic characteristics on the intensity of concomitant medication use was also examined.

RESULTS

The proportion of women using any prescription medication besides hormone therapy did not differ between the arms. However, the type of prescribed drugs varied between the arms. After combining data from both hormone therapy arms, for women using HRT the combined hazard ratio was 1.26 (95% CI: 1.05-1.53) for the use of calcium channel blockers, 1.48 (95% CI: 1.10-1.99) for local vaginal treatment, 0.70 (95% CI: 0.50-0.99) for hypnotics and sedatives and 0.77 (95% CI: 0.60-0.99) for selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). Women who were older, who had a higher body mass index, who were unemployed and who lived outside the capital used more prescription drugs in comparison with others.

CONCLUSIONS

Hormone therapy did not increase the overall use of prescription medication other than hormone therapy, but the types of drugs used in hormone therapy and nontherapy arms varied, with increased use of calcium channel blockers for hypertension and local vaginal treatments for vaginal candidiasis and decreased use of hypnotics, sedatives and SSRIs in the HRT arms.

Advances in hormone replacement therapy with drospirenone, a unique progestogen with aldosterone receptor antagonism

Unlike other currently available progestogens, drospirenone (DRSP) has a pharmacological profile, which closely mimics that of endogenous progesterone, most notably potent anti-aldosterone and anti-androgenic effects. Consequently, DRSP, when combined with 17beta-estradiol (E2) as hormone replacement therapy (HRT), offsets E2-related water and sodium retention by blocking the mineralocorticoid receptor. This review evaluates the potential benefits offered by DRSP as the progestin component of HRT with respect to its anti-aldosterone activity, which translates into positive effects on body weight and blood pressure in clinical trials of continuous, combined E2/DRSP in post-menopausal women. In a 1-year, large-scale, randomised, controlled trial, E2 1 mg/DRSP 2 mg significantly decreased mean body weight by 1.2 kg versus baseline (P<0.001), whereas patients receiving E2 1 mg gained weight. E2 1 mg/DRSP 2 mg also significantly lowered mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) by 9.0 mmHg from baseline (P<0.05) versus 3.7 mmHg in the E2 1 mg group (P=0.220) in a sub-group of hypertensive women. In addition, E2/DRSP was not associated with hyperkalaemia (potassium > or =5.5 meq/L) irrespective of concomitant use of ACE inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor antagonists or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and co-morbid diabetes mellitus. In summary, as well as effectively treating climacteric symptoms, DRSP 2 mg combined with E2 1 mg has shown positive effects on body weight and blood pressure in clinical trials, most likely due to DRSP's anti-aldosterone properties. This combination may therefore offer an alternative therapeutic option with additional benefits beyond current HRT agents for symptomatic post-menopausal women.

Tratamiento hormonal sustitutivo y enfermedades cardiovasculares

Despite biologically plausible mechanisms for cardiac protection and compelling evidence from observational studies suggesting that menopausal hormone therapy confers cardiovascular benefit, results of well-designed and conducted randomized clinical trials in healthy women and in women with established coronary heart disease displayed that menopausal hormone therapy failed to prevent clinical cardiovascular events and rather was associated with harms. Clinical trial of the SERM raloxifene also did not demonstrate a decrease in coronary events. It is unknown whether the earlier initiation of such therapies, i.e., at menopause, would result in favorable outcomes; or whether different hormonal preparations, lower doses, or alternate routes of administration would confer benefit. At present, proved coronary risk reduction strategies are requisite (albeit underutilized) for menopausal women; these include lifestyle and pharmacologic coronary preventive interventions. The baseline characteristics of menopausal women with coronary heart disease who were participants in cardiovascular outcome trials of menopausal hormone therapy or raloxifene were remarkably similar; globally, cardiovascular risk factors were not optimally controlled at entry into these trials, suggesting that more aggressive cardiovascular risk interventions are appropriate to achieve optimal target goals for menopausal women with documented coronary heart disease.