Proton pump inhibitors may hinder hypophosphatemic effect of lanthanum carbonate, but not of ferric citrate hydrate or sucroferric oxyhydroxide, in hemodialysis patients

Progress in pharmacotherapy for the treatment of hyperphosphatemia in renal failure

INTRODUCTION

Among the clinical and metabolic complications of progressive chronic kidney disease (CKD), CKD-mineral bone disorder (CKD-MBD) significantly contributes to morbidity and mortality. While overt and persistent hyperphosphatemia is typical of advanced CKD and requires treatment, other abnormalities of calcium/phosphate metabolism begin to occur since the early stages of the disease.

AREAS COVERED

We searched on the PubMed database, without restrictions for language or time range, for randomized clinical trials and meta-analyses investigating phosphate-lowering therapies. The various phosphate binders show different safety profiles and diverse effects on calcium/phosphate metabolism and vascular calcification. The in-depth knowledge of the characteristics of these drugs is crucial to ensure adequate treatment to CKD patients.

EXPERT OPINION

A proper control of serum phosphate can be achieved using phosphate binders. These medications may induce side effects. Moreover, data on their impact on clinical outcomes are partly controversial or scarce, especially for the new generation drugs. Hyperphosphatemia favors cardiovascular disease and increases the risk for CKD progression. These effects are partially mediated by fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23), a phosphaturic hormone that raises to maintain normal serum phosphate. Since there are no data supporting the use of phosphate-lowering agents when phosphataemia is normal, a key role is played by reducing dietary phosphate intake with the aim to control serum phosphate and the compensatory FGF23 and parathyroid hormone (PTH) increase.

Proton pump inhibitors with calcium acetate on serum phosphorus levels in hemodialysis patients

Background

The increase in serum phosphorus level is an independent risk factor for mortality in patients with chronic renal failure or undergoing dialysis due to end-stage renal disease. Proton pump inhibitors (PPI) are the general name given to agents used to suppress stomach acid. In this study, the clinical benefit of using PPIs in addition to drugs used for phosphorus control was investigated.

Methods

153 patients with end-stage renal disease were included in the study. The data of the patients who had been on hemodialysis for at least 6 months and using calcium acetate for at least 1 month were recorded in the SPSS 21 program. The patients were analyzed in two groups according to whether they used PPI or not. Anamnesis, patient follow-up, laboratory, and treatment forms collected from hemodialysis centers were used.

Results

Of the 153 patients in the study, 49% were males and the mean age was 65.11±11.23. The mean duration of patients on dialysis was 48.5 months. Hypertension was found to be the most common comorbidity with 75.8% prevalence among the patients. The mean phosphorus levels of the patients using calcium acetate together with PPI were found to be approximately 1.2 mg/dl lower (p= 0.000).

Conclusion

It should be taken into account that the use of PPI together with calcium acetate, which is still common as a phosphorus binder in developing countries, can contribute to controlling phosphorus levels.

Iron absorption and phosphate-lowering effects of ferric citrate hydrate are not influenced by gastric acid secretion inhibitors in patients with chronic kidney disease: a retrospective post hoc analysis

BACKGROUND

Ferric citrate hydrate (FC), an oral iron product is approved as iron preparation for iron deficiency anemia and phosphate binder for chronic kidney disease (CKD). We investigated whether gastric acid secretion inhibitors (GASI) influenced on iron absorption and phosphate-lowering effects of FC.

METHODS

Two phase 3 studies of FC for treatment of hyperphosphatemia in CKD patients (non-dialysis-dependent, 12 weeks, and hemodialysis, 52 weeks), were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into with or without concomitant GASI and levels of iron- and phosphate-related parameters were analyzed.

RESULTS

In non-dialysis study (FC, 60 patients; placebo, 30 patients), 14 FC patients and 14 placebo patients used GASI. No significant differences were found between the FC and placebo groups for adjusted mean differences (95% CI) of changes from baseline to end of treatment (EOT) in serum ferritin [104.84 ng/mL (35.97, 173.71) with GASI vs 145.30 ng/mL (96.34, 194.25) without GASI, P = 0.34], and transferrin saturation (TSAT) [12.56% (- 0.83, 25.95) with GASI vs 18.56% (8.15, 28.98) without GASI, P = 0.49]. In hemodialysis study, 95/180 patients used GASI. Mean changes (SD) from baseline to EOT in serum ferritin were 166.32 ng/mL (153.70) with GASI and 155.16 ng/mL (139.47) without GASI, and for TSAT were 16.60% (19.44) with GASI and 16.02% (18.81) without GASI. In both studies, there were no differences in the changes from baseline to EOT in serum phosphate between with and without GASI cohorts.

CONCLUSION

GASI did not influence on the changes in serum ferritin, TSAT and serum phosphate by FC administration.

Safety and effectiveness of lanthanum carbonate for hyperphosphatemia in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients: a meta-analysis

Objective

The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of lanthanum carbonate (LC) versus calcium salts, non-LC phosphate binders (PBs), sevelamer, or placebo in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD).

Materials and methods

A literature search on PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was conducted up to 18 June 2021. Data acquisition and quality assessment were performed by two reviewers. Meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the serum biochemical parameters, adverse events, and patient-level outcomes of LC, non-LC PBs, and sevelamer for hyperphosphatemia in patients with CKD. Heterogeneity across studies was assessed utilizing the I² statistic and Q-test, and a random effect model was selected to calculate the pooled effect size.

Results

A total of 26 randomized, controlled trials and 3 observational studies were included. Compared to the other groups, better control effect of serum phosphorus (RR = 2.68, p < 0.001), reduction in serum phosphorus (95%CI = −1.93, −0.99; p < 0.001), Ca × P (95%CI = −13.89, −2.99; p = 0.002), serum intact parathyroid hormone levels (95%CI = −181.17, −3.96, p = 0.041) were found in LC group. Besides, reduced risk of various adverse effects, such as hypotension, abdominal pain, diarrhea, dyspepsia, and a score of coronary artery calcification were identified with LC in comparison to calcium salt, non-LC PBs, or placebo group. Significantly lower risk in mortality with LC treatment vs. non-LC PBs was observed, while no significant difference was identified between LC and calcium salt groups.

Conclusion

LC might be an alternative treatment for hyperphosphatemia in patients with CKD considering its comprehensive curative effect.

Long-term efficacy and safety of iron-based phosphate binders, ferric citrate hydrate and sucroferric oxyhydroxide, in hemodialysis patients

PURPOSE

Iron-based phosphate binders, including ferric citrate hydrate (FCH) and sucroferric oxyhydroxide (SFOH), have been used for the treatment of hyperphosphatemia in end-stage renal disease patients on dialysis. However, the long-term efficacy and safety of these agents have not yet been clearly elucidated.

METHODS

Laboratory data of 56 hemodialysis patients who had been prescribed either FCH (n = 33) or SFOH (n = 23) were retrospectively examined.

RESULTS

We showed that both FCH and SFOH significantly and consistently decreased serum phosphate concentrations in the patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis during the 36-month observation period. Serum levels of calcium, intact parathyroid hormone, as well as hemoglobin levels were unaltered. No overshoot of parameters of iron metabolism, such as transferrin saturation and serum ferritin levels, was observed, and serum ferritin level remained under 300 ng/mL in most patients. A trend towards decrease in the doses of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents used and frequency of intravenous iron use was observed in both treatment groups. No severe adverse drug reactions were observed in either the patients receiving FCH or SFOH.

CONCLUSION

The results of the present study suggest that the iron-based phosphate binders, FCH and SFOH, decrease serum phosphate concentrations consistently and are safe to use over the long-term in maintenance hemodialysis patients.

Assessment of Inorganic Phosphate Intake by the Measurement of the Phosphate/Urea Nitrogen Ratio in Urine

In chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients, it would be desirable to reduce the intake of inorganic phosphate (P) rather than limit the intake of P contained in proteins. Urinary excretion of P should reflect intestinal absorption of P(inorganic plus protein-derived). The aim of the present study is to determine whether the ratio of urinary P to urinary urea nitrogen (P/UUN ratio) helps identify patients with a high intake of inorganic P.A cross-sectional study was performed in 71 patients affected by metabolic syndrome with CKD (stages 2–3) with normal serum P concentration. A 3-day dietary survey was performed to estimate the average daily amount and the source of P ingested. The daily intake of P was 1086.5 ± 361.3 mg/day; 64% contained in animal proteins, 22% in vegetable proteins, and 14% as inorganic P. The total amount of P ingested did not correlate with daily phosphaturia, but it did correlate with the P/UUN ratio (p < 0.018). Patients with the highest tertile of the P/UUN ratio >71.1 mg/g presented more abundant inorganic P intake (p < 0.038).The P/UUN ratio is suggested to be a marker of inorganic P intake. This finding might be useful in clinical practices to identify the source of dietary P and to make personalized dietary recommendations directed to reduce inorganic P intake.

Proton-pump inhibitors associated with decreased urinary citrate excretion

INTRODUCTION

Proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) may increase the risk of kidney stone formation, but the mechanism has not been elucidated. There is a paucity of literature evaluating the effects of PPIs on urinary metabolites and urine pH.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of nephrolithiasis patients treated at our institution and compared patients who were taking PPIs to those who were not at the time of their 24-h urine collections. Hierarchical multivariate linear regression was used to evaluate the independent relationship between PPI use and urinary mineral composition.

RESULTS

We identified 301 consecutive patients, 88 (29%) of whom were taking PPIs at the time of their 24-h urine collections. Patients taking PPIs were older and more likely to have medical comorbidities associated with metabolic syndrome such as hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidemia (p < 0.01). Controlling for these factors, patients taking PPIs were found to have 12% lower 24-h urine citrate excretion (β =  - 0.12, ΔF = 4.24, p = 0.04). There were no other differences in urinary mineral composition between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that patients who take PPIs regularly may be at risk for decreased urinary citrate excretion. The consequent decrease in urinary citrate may become clinically significant for patients with other predisposing factors for hypocitraturia.