The comprehensive analysis of clinical trials registration for IgA nephropathy therapy on ClinicalTrials.gov

The Efficacy and Safety of Reduced-Dose Oral Methylprednisolone in High-Risk Immunoglobulin A Nephropathy

Introduction

The therapeutic effects of steroids in immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) global (TESTING) study reported that methylprednisolone reduces the risk of major kidney events in individuals with IgAN at high risk of disease progression compared to supportive care alone but is associated with increased serious adverse events (SAEs) primarily with full-dose therapy. The risk benefit balance of the reduced-dose methylprednisolone regimen is examined in this prespecified analysis of the reduced-dose cohort of the TESTING trial.

Methods

Between 2017 and 2019, patients with IgAN, proteinuria ≥1 g/d despite 3 months of renin-angiotensin-system blockade and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 30 to 120 ml/min per 1.73 m2 were randomized to reduced-dose methylprednisolone 0.4 mg/kg/d or placebo. The primary outcome was a composite of a 40% eGFR decline, kidney failure, or death due to kidney disease.

Results

A total of 241 participants were randomized and followed-up with for a median of 2.5 years (mean age: 37 years; baseline eGFR: 65 ml/min per 1.73 m2; proteinuria: 2.48 g/d). Methylprednisolone was associated with fewer primary outcome events compared to placebo (7/121 vs. 22/120; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.24; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.10-0.58, P = 0.002), lowered proteinuria, and reduced eGFR rate of decline from baseline. The mean difference between methylprednisolone and placebo in proteinuria and eGFR from baseline was -1.15 g/d and 7.9 ml/min per 1.73 m2 (P < 0.001) at 12 months, respectively; however, these benefits were lost over time. There were 7 versus 3 SAEs in the methylprednisolone versus placebo group (HR: 1.97; 95% CI: 0.49-7.90), including 5 versus 2 infections.

Conclusion

Reduced-dose methylprednisolone is effective in improving kidney outcomes in high risk IgAN; however, it is associated with a modestly higher number of SAEs compared to placebo.

Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone-system inhibitors increase the serum level of complement component 4 in patients with immunoglobulin A nephropathy

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the impact of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone-system (RAAS) inhibitors on complement component 4 (C4) serum levels in patients with immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN).

METHODS

A total of 423 patients diagnosed with IgAN at Shanxi Provincial People's Hospital, China, between 1 January 2017 and 31 December 2021 were divided into two groups, a RAAS inhibitor group and a non-RAAS inhibitor group, for comparative analysis.

RESULTS

The RAAS inhibitor group exhibited significantly increased C4 and eGFR levels and had a higher proportion of patients with hypertension compared with the non-RAAS inhibitor group. Serum C4 levels were positively correlated with 24-hour urine protein, serum C3 levels and blood uric acid levels but negatively correlated with eGFR levels. In addition, serum C4 levels were positively correlated with the severity of mesangial hypercellularity and interstitial/tubular injury. Through prognostic analysis, serum C4 was identified as an independent risk factor for the progression of IgAN.

CONCLUSION

Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone-system inhibitors can increase serum C4 levels in patients with IgAN and may represent an independent risk factor for disease progression.

Comparative analysis between the safety and efficacy of oral corticosteroids versus corticosteroids pulse therapies in IgA nephropathy

OBJECTIVE

This study retrospectively compared the safety and efficacy of oral corticosteroid therapy (OCT) and corticosteroid pulse therapy (CPT) in the treatment of IgA nephropathy.

METHODS

One ninety-two patients were diagnosed with IgA nephropathy and had an estimated glomerular filtration rate > 15mL/min/1.73m2 and 24-h urine protein level of 0.75-3.5g. Patients were divided into CPT and OCT groups according to the treatment protocol. The differences in the efficacy and safety between the two groups were assessed by logistic regression analysis and propensity score matching.

RESULTS

Significant differences at baseline, including 24-h urine protein level and eGFR, were observed between the two groups. Logistic regression analysis indicated that the remission rate increased significantly, while the incidences of total adverse events and infections decreased in CPT group compared with the OCT group after adjusting the potential confounding factors. Forty-seven pairs of subjects are matched by using propensity score matching with similar baseline data. The results indicate that the total remission rate and complete remission rate were significantly higher, while the incidences of total adverse events were lower (p = 0.008) in the CPT group than in the OCT group. The subgroup analysis showed that CPT group was more likely to achieve remission in patients with initial 24-h urine protein levels falling into the range of 2-3.5 g and Oxford Classification of S1 or C1/2 (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Among patients with IgA nephropathy and 24-h urine protein levels of 0.75-3.5g, CPT may be more effective than OCT in reducing urinary protein levels and improving renal function with a lower incidence of adverse events.

Corticosteroid Therapy in Immunoglobulin A Nephropathy: A Friend or Foe?

BACKGROUND

The administration of corticosteroids in addition to supportive care to delay progressive immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN), the most common primary glomerulonephritis worldwide, remains controversial. This is partly due to the paucity of well-designed randomized controlled trials and well-known corticosteroid-related side effects. As a result, clinical equipoise in corticosteroid therapy exists depending on geographical regions and the clinician's preference.

SUMMARY

Better understanding around the pathogenesis of IgAN has prompted several clinical trials exploring the effects of immunosuppressive agents including corticosteroids. Earlier studies of corticosteroids were limited by suboptimal study designs, inadequate implementation of standard of care, and inconsistent adverse event data collection. Two well-designed, adequately powered, multi-centre randomized controlled trials, the STOP-IgAN and TESTING studies, have reported contrasting kidney outcomes that have further fuelled the clinical conundrum regarding the efficacy of corticosteroids. Both studies independently reported greater adverse events with corticosteroids. A novel targeted release formulation of budesonide, which has been hypothesized to reduce the adverse events associated with systemic corticosteroids, has shown promising results in the Phase 3 NefigaRD trial. Studies of treatments targeting B cells and the complement cascade are currently underway, and early data appear encouraging. This review provides an overview of the current literature around the understanding of the pathomechanisms and benefits and harm of corticosteroid use in IgAN.

KEY MESSAGES

Recent evidence suggests the use of corticosteroids in a selected cohort of people with IgAN at high risk of disease progression can improve kidney outcomes but comes with an associated risk of treatment-related adverse events, particularly with higher doses. Management decisions should therefore follow an informed patient-clinician discussion.