Evaluation of head and cervical spine posture after functional therapy with Twin‑Block and Bionator appliances: A pilot randomized controlled trial

Cervical spine changes with functional appliance treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

Cervical spine posture is related to craniofacial morphology, airway, gait and body posture. This posture may be influenced by the changes in the mandibular position brought about by functional appliance therapy. Therefore, this systematic review aimed to assess the changes in the cervical spine posture with functional appliance treatment in Skeletal Class II subjects.

Methods

A search of studies in six electronic databases - Medline (via Pubmed), the Cochrane Library, OVID, LILACS, Scopus and Web of Science were performed until January 18, 2024 without any restriction in date or language of publication. Eligibility screening, study selection, and data extraction were performed by two reviewers independently. The risk of bias assessment of the included studies was performed with the Newcastle Ottawa scale and Cochrane RoB 2.0. Meta-analysis was performed using random effects model for assessment of changes in the cervical spine with removable and fixed functional appliances.

Results

Twelve articles that satisfied the eligibility criteria were included for systematic review and nine articles for meta-analysis. Five studies showed a low risk of bias, one as moderate and six as high risk of bias. GRADE assessment revealed a low quality evidence. Meta-analysis revealed a decrease of the upper cervical inclination by 1.16° (95 % CI of -2.68 to 0.35, I2 = 6 %), an increase of the middle cervical inclination by 2.20° (95 % CI of 0.46-3.94, I2 = 49 %), an increase in cervical curvature angle by 1.60° (95 % CI of 0.12-3.09, I2 = 89 %) and a decrease in cervical lordosis angle by 1.54° (95 % CI of -4.16 to 1.08, I2 = 0 %).

Conclusions

Minimal uprighting of the cervical spine was noted with functional appliances. Fixed functional appliances exerted a greater effect than removable functional appliances. Cervical hyperlordosis was reduced with removable functional appliance treatment. Though these changes are minimal, the clinical orthodontist should be aware that functional therapy also influences cervical spine posture. Due to the heterogeneity and low quality of evidence, the results are to be considered critically.

Dentoalveolar, skeletal, pharyngeal airway, cervical posture, hyoid bone position, and soft palate changes with Myobrace and Twin-block: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the dentoalveolar, skeletal, pharyngeal airway, cervical posture, hyoid bone position, and soft palate effects of the Myobrace and Twin-block appliances. The second was to compare them in terms of ease of use by assessing the factors that may influence patient compliance.

METHODS

The study included thirty-six Class II division 1 patients (19 females, 17 males; mean age, 12.14 ± 1.23) who had previously been treated in the Orthodontic Clinic at Sivas Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry. The patients were divided into two groups: Group 1: Myobrace (n = 18), and Group 2: twin block (n = 18). The effects of the appliances on the skeletal, dentoalveolar, soft tissue, craniocervical, and other anatomic structures were assessed using 46 measurements (22 linear and 24 angular), on pre and post-treatment cephalometric radiographs. AudaxCeph 5.0 software (Ljubljana, Slovenia) was used for the analysis. To analyze the changes after one year of treatment, a paired sample t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used. Intergroup comparison was performed using the Student t-test and the Mann-Whitney U test.

RESULTS

In the Myobrace and Twin-block groups, there was a significant increase in SNB (°) (p = 0.004, p = 0.001), IMPA (°) (p = 0.005, p = 0.001) and a significant drop in U1/SN (°) (p = 0.021, p = 0.005). The lengths of Cd-Gn (mm), Go-Pg (mm), and Cd-Go (mm) increased significantly in the Twin-block group (p = 0.003, p = 0.010, p = 0.001), whereas the Myobrace group did not change. Similarly, there was no significant difference in pharyngeal and soft palate measurements in the Myobrace group but a statistically significant decrease in SP length and angle in the Twin-block group (p = 0.001, p = 0.006). Increases in SN/OPT (°) (p = 0.032, p = 0.001) and SN/CVT (°) (p = 0.012, p = 0.001) were statistically significant in both groups. Myobrace was more difficult to use while sleeping, whereas the twin block caused more nausea.

CONCLUSIONS

Both appliances can be used for mandibular advancement. The Twin-block appliance, on the other hand, was more effective and patient-friendly.

Relationship between Craniocervical Posture and Sagittal Position of the Mandible: A Systematic Review

Changes in craniocervical posture are a critical issue in modern society. Alterations of the mandible position in the anterior-posterior direction in association with head and neck posture are reported. The objective of the present review was to evaluate the relationship between craniocervical posture and sagittal position of the mandible and to evaluate the risk of bias inthe included studies. Electronic databases used to perform the search were PubMed, Wiley Online Library, and Cochrane. Only clinical trials that assessed sagittal craniocervical posture and mandible position in lateral cephalograms were included. Selected inclusion criteria were used to assess the finally selected studies. The upper and lower cervical spine was evaluated by seven and six studies, respectively. The risk of bias in the included studies varied from low to moderate. Literature research identified 438 records from 3 databases. Eventually, seven eligible clinical trials were included in this review. Evaluating the relationship between craniocervical posture and mandible position in the sagittal plane, it can be concluded that increased cervical inclination and head upright position are associated with the posterior position of the mandible. Attention to patients’ craniocervical posture should be paid as a part of clinical evaluation since it might be the reason for the changed mandible position.