1
|
Gram EG, Jønsson ABR, Brodersen JB, Damhus CS. Questioning 'Informed Choice' in Medical Screening: The Role of Neoliberal Rhetoric, Culture, and Social Context. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11:healthcare11091230. [PMID: 37174772 PMCID: PMC10178002 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11091230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2023] [Revised: 04/22/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Participation in medical screening programs is presented as a voluntary decision that should be based on an informed choice. An informed choice is often emphasized to rely on three assumptions: (1) the decision-maker has available information about the benefits and harms, (2) the decision-maker can understand and interpret this information, and (3) the decision-maker can relate this information to personal values and preferences. In this article, we empirically challenge the concept of informed choice in the context of medical screening. We use document analysis to analyze and build upon findings and interpretations from previously published articles on participation in screening. We find that citizens do not receive neutral or balanced information about benefits and harms, yet are exposed to manipulative framing effects. The citizens have high expectations about the benefits of screening, and therefore experience cognitive strains when informed about the harm. We demonstrate that decisions about screening participation are informed by neoliberal arguments of personal responsibility and cultural healthism, and thus cannot be regarded as decisions based on individual values and preferences independently of context. We argue that the concept of informed choice serves as a power technology for people to govern themselves and can be considered an implicit verification of biopower.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Grundtvig Gram
- Center of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, 1353 Copenhagen, Denmark
- Primary Health Care Research Unit, 4100 Region Zealand, Denmark
| | - Alexandra Brandt Ryborg Jønsson
- Center of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, 1353 Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of People and Technology, Roskilde University, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark
- The Research Unit for General Practice, Department of Social Medicine, University of Tromsø, 9019 Tromsø, Norway
| | - John Brandt Brodersen
- Center of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, 1353 Copenhagen, Denmark
- Primary Health Care Research Unit, 4100 Region Zealand, Denmark
- The Research Unit for General Practice, Department of Social Medicine, University of Tromsø, 9019 Tromsø, Norway
| | - Christina Sadolin Damhus
- Center of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, 1353 Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gummersbach E, Fuchs A, Lubisch D, in der Schmitten J, Pentzek M, Leve V. Was motiviert Frauen zur Teilnahme am Mammographiescreening? Ergebnisse einer qualitativen Analyse von Interviews. PRÄVENTION UND GESUNDHEITSFÖRDERUNG 2023. [DOI: 10.1007/s11553-023-01024-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/30/2023]
Abstract
Zusammenfassung
Einleitung
Die Teilnahmerate am Mammographiescreening beträgt derzeit ca. 49 %. Über die Gründe für Frauen, am Screening teilzunehmen, ist bisher zu wenig bekannt.
Material und Methoden
Für eine qualitative Studie wurden aus den Teilnehmerinnen einer Fragebogenstudie zum Einfluss verschiedener Informationsbroschüren auf die Teilnahmebereitschaft 8 Frauen für Interviews ausgewählt. Die Frauen wurden nach den Kriterien Teilnahmebereitschaft (6 ja, 2 nein), Bildung (6 hoch, 2 niedrig) und Entscheidungssicherheit (6 hoch, 2 niedrig) ausgewählt und im Jahr 2014 in problemzentrierten Einzelinterviews befragt. Sequenzen der Interviewtranskripte wurden in multidisziplinären Teams inhaltsanalytisch ausgewertet.
Ergebnisse
Alle interviewten Frauen hatten Mammographieerfahrung. Es wurden übergreifende Themen in sechs Kategorien identifiziert: Pflichtgefühl, Autonomie, Zweifel, Unsicherheit, Arzt/Ärztin, Institution. Die Frauen sahen in der Screeningteilnahme die Chance, einer möglichen Bedrohung durch Brustkrebs zu entgehen. Erfahrungen mit Brustkrebs im Umfeld beeinflussten ihre Entscheidung. Einer selbstverantwortlichen Entscheidungsbildung wurde ein hoher Stellenwert zugesprochen, andererseits folgten sie dem Rat ihres Arztes/ihrer Ärztin. Bei der Durchführung des Screenings fühlten sie sich einer unpersönlichen und schmerzhaften Maschinerie ausgesetzt.
Schlussfolgerungen
Frauen treffen ihre Entscheidung, am Screening teilzunehmen oder nicht, eher auf der emotionalen Ebene. Um ihnen eine informierte Entscheidung zu ermöglichen, sollten in einem ärztlichen Gespräch neben sachlichen Informationen ihre Vorstellungen und Erfahrungen in Bezug auf das Mammographiescreening ergebnisoffen besprochen werden.
Collapse
|
3
|
Yakong VN, Afaya A, Alhassan RK, Sang S, Salia SM, Afaya RA, Karim JF, Kuug A, Selorm DDS, Atakro CA, Akokre R, Adatara P, Ayanore MA. Leveraging breast cancer screening to promote timely detection, diagnosis and treatment among women in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review protocol. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e058729. [PMID: 35613753 PMCID: PMC9134199 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058729] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Female breast cancer is now the most often diagnosed cancer in the world. Breast cancer screening aims to reduce mortalities related to cancer, and morbidity associated with advanced stages of the disease, through timely detection in asymptomatic women. This study aims to conduct a comprehensive assessment and evaluation of the evidence on the factors that influence the provision and uptake of breast cancer screening among women in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). METHODS AND ANALYSIS PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature including Google Scholar will be searched to identify published studies on barriers and facilitators to breast cancer screening from January 2010 to 2021. Two reviewers will independently assess the quality of all the included studies using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool version 2018. We envisage that this review will adduce evidence on common barriers and facilitators to breast cancer screening in SSA. Identifying these barriers and facilitators will help guide the initialisation of effective interventions that will improve breast cancer screening uptake among women in SSA. This review will also guide future research in developing, implementing and evaluating appropriate interventions tailored toward increasing breast cancer screening uptake. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethics approval for this protocol is not required since it does not involve collecting data from human participants. The outcomes of this study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vida Nyagre Yakong
- Department of Preventive Health Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, University for Development Studies, Tamale, Ghana
| | - Agani Afaya
- College of Nursing, Yonsei University, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Department of Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Ghana
| | - Robert Kaba Alhassan
- Centre for Health Policy and Implementation Research. Institute of Health Research, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Ghana
| | - Somin Sang
- College of Nursing, Yonsei University, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Solomon Mohammed Salia
- Department of Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Ghana
- Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Research Institute SHARE, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Richard Adongo Afaya
- Department of Midwifery and Women's Health, School of Nursing and Midwifery, University for Development Studies, Tamale, Ghana
| | - Jebuni Fuseini Karim
- Department of Nursing, Superior School of Health, University of Algarve, Campus de Gambelas, Ed. 5-8005-193, Faro Portugal, Portugal
| | - Anthony Kuug
- Department of Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Ghana
| | | | | | - Renna Akokre
- Department of Nursing, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana
| | - Peter Adatara
- Department of Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Ghana
| | - Martin Amogre Ayanore
- Department of Health Policy Planning and Management, School of Public Health, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Ghana
| |
Collapse
|