Safety and efficacy of a digital therapeutic for substance use disorder: Secondary analysis of data from a NIDA clinical trials network study

Physician Reluctance to Intervene in Addiction: A Systematic Review

Importance

The overdose epidemic continues in the US, with 107 941 overdose deaths in 2022 and countless lives affected by the addiction crisis. Although widespread efforts to train and support physicians to implement medications and other evidence-based substance use disorder interventions have been ongoing, adoption of these evidence-based practices (EBPs) by physicians remains low.

Objective

To describe physician-reported reasons for reluctance to address substance use and addiction in their clinical practices using screening, treatment, harm reduction, or recovery support interventions.

Data Sources

A literature search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, medRxiv, and SSRN Medical Research Network was conducted and returned articles published from January 1, 1960, through October 5, 2021.

Study Selection

Publications that included physicians, discussed substance use interventions, and presented data on reasons for reluctance to intervene in addiction were included.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

Two reviewers (L.N., M.C., L.F., J.P., C.S., and S.W.) independently reviewed each publication; a third reviewer resolved discordant votes (M.C. and W.C.). This systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines and the theoretical domains framework was used to systematically extract reluctance reasons.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was reasons for physician reluctance to address substance use disorder. The association of reasons for reluctance with practice setting and drug type was also measured. Reasons and other variables were determined according to predefined criteria.

Results

A total of 183 of 9308 returned studies reporting data collected from 66 732 physicians were included. Most studies reported survey data. Alcohol, nicotine, and opioids were the most often studied substances; screening and treatment were the most often studied interventions. The most common reluctance reasons were lack of institutional support (173 of 213 articles [81.2%]), knowledge (174 of 242 articles [71.9%]), skill (170 of 230 articles [73.9%]), and cognitive capacity (136 of 185 articles [73.5%]). Reimbursement concerns were also noted. Bivariate analysis revealed associations between these reasons and physician specialty, intervention type, and drug.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this systematic review of reasons for physician reluctance to intervene in addiction, the most common reasons were lack of institutional support, knowledge, skill, and cognitive capacity. Targeting these reasons with education and training, policy development, and program implementation may improve adoption by physicians of EBPs for substance use and addiction care. Future studies of physician-reported reasons for reluctance to adopt EBPs may be improved through use of a theoretical framework and improved adherence to and reporting of survey development best practices; development of a validated survey instrument may further improve study results.

Characteristics of mHealth therapy app engagement by young adults with OUD

While rates of opioid use disorder (OUD) continue to rise across the country, young adults with OUD are at particular risk as they have poorer treatment outcomes and lack developmentally appropriate treatment options. The introduction of mobile applications for OUD present a new avenue to improve treatment outcomes for young adults. One such app, reSET® provides app users with weekly cognitive behavioral therapy lessons focusing on addiction with built in contingency management for completion of lessons and negative urine drug screens. This exploratory study aimed to identify the characteristics of patients who engaged with the application, reSET®, as well as to describe potential differences in treatment outcomes between engagers and non-engagers. This observational cohort study analyzed clinical and other program data from 35 young adults between the ages of 20-28 that were involved in the care and prescribed medications for OUD in Baltimore, Maryland during the 12-week period of app prescription. Results indicated that young adults had dichotomous levels of engagement, with almost 30% engaging highly with the app, completing >90% of lessons, and approximately 70% having low engagement, completing <25% of lessons. There were no differences in mental health outcomes, but engagers were more likely to be retained in care at the end of the 12-week prescription as compared to non-engagers. Overall, results suggest that mHealth apps targeted for OUD treatment offer potential treatment benefits for young adults, especially regarding treatment retention. Future studies should investigate the treatment and mental health impacts of reSET® and other mHealth apps within this population.

Determinants and prevalence of relapse among patients with substance use disorder in a rural population: A retrospective observational study

INTRODUCTION

Substance use relapse after successful detoxication and rehabilitation is one of the most important aspects of addiction worldwide. This study aims to examine the current prevalence of relapse and to determine the factors associated with relapse among patients with substance use disorder (SUD) in a rural population.

METHODS

This single-centered retrospective observational study enrolled a total of 915 patients with SUD who visited Banna hospital, Nakhon Nayok province, Thailand, from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2021. Multiple logistic regression models determined the factors associated with relapse among the patients with SUD.

RESULTS

The substance use relapse rate in this rural Thai population was 24 % (95%CI 21.16-26.70). Multivariate analysis revealed that being over 40 years of age, single, and unemployed, and having no legal history were associated with relapse among the patients with SUD. Furthermore, family disputes, addicted friends, and addicted close relatives resulted in a major significant increase in the risk of substance use relapse.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study confirmed that family disputes, addicted friends, and addicted close relatives were the main associations with addiction relapse. Therefore, addiction rehabilitation programs based on the findings of the current study may reduce and contribute to preventing the risk of substance use relapse.

Mobile applications for cognitive training: Content analysis and quality review

Background

As the number of individuals suffering from cognitive diseases continues to rise, dealing with the diminished cognitive function that comes with age has become a serious public health concern. While the use of mobile applications (apps) as digital treatments for cognitive training shows promise, the analysis of their content and quality remains unclear.

Objective

The aim of this study was to systematically search and assess cognitive training apps using the multidimensional mobile app rating scale (MARS) to rate objective quality and identify critical points.

Methods

A search was conducted on the Google Play Store and Apple App Store in February 2022 using the terms "cognitive training" and "cognitive rehabilitation." The cognitive domains provided by each app were analyzed, and the frequency and percentage according to the apps were obtained. The MARS, a mHealth app quality rating tool including multidimensional measures, was used to analyze the quality of the apps. The relationship between the MARS score, the number of reviews, and 5-star ratings were examined.

Results

Of the 53 apps, 52 (98 %) included memory function, 48 (91 %) included attention function, 24 (45 %) included executive function, and 19 (36 %) included visuospatial function. The mean (SD) scores of MARS, 5-star ratings, and reviews of 53 apps were 3.09 (0.61), 4.33 (0.30), and 62,415.43 (121,578.77). From the between-section comparison, engagement (mean 2.97, SD 0.68) obtained lower scores than functionality (mean 3.18, SD 0.62), aesthetics (mean 3.13, SD 0.72), and information (mean 3.11, SD 0.54). The mean quality score and reviews showed a statistically significant association (r = 0.447 and P = .001*). As the number of domains increased, the mean quality score showed a statistically significant increasing trend (P = .002*).

Conclusions

Most apps provided training for the memory and attention domains, but few apps included executive function or visuospatial domains. The quality of the apps improved significantly when more domains were provided, and was positively associated with the number of reviews received. These results could be useful for the future development of mobile apps for cognitive training.

Study protocol for a factorial-randomized controlled trial evaluating the implementation, costs, effectiveness, and sustainment of digital therapeutics for substance use disorder in primary care (DIGITS Trial)

BACKGROUND

Experts recommend that treatment for substance use disorder (SUD) be integrated into primary care. The Digital Therapeutics for Opioids and Other SUD (DIGITS) Trial tests strategies for implementing reSET® and reSET-O®, which are prescription digital therapeutics for SUD and opioid use disorder, respectively, that include the community reinforcement approach, contingency management, and fluency training to reinforce concept mastery. This purpose of this trial is to test whether two implementation strategies improve implementation success (Aim 1) and achieve better population-level cost effectiveness (Aim 2) over a standard implementation approach.

METHODS/DESIGN

The DIGITS Trial is a hybrid type III cluster-randomized trial. It examines outcomes of implementation strategies, rather than studying clinical outcomes of a digital therapeutic. It includes 22 primary care clinics from a healthcare system in Washington State and patients with unhealthy substance use who visit clinics during an active implementation period (up to one year). Primary care clinics implemented reSET and reSET-O using a multifaceted implementation strategy previously used by clinical leaders to roll-out smartphone apps ("standard implementation" including discrete strategies such as clinician training, electronic health record tools). Clinics were randomized as 21 sites in a 2x2 factorial design to receive up to two added implementation strategies: (1) practice facilitation, and/or (2) health coaching. Outcome data are derived from electronic health records and logs of digital therapeutic usage. Aim 1's primary outcomes include reach of the digital therapeutics to patients and fidelity of patients' use of the digital therapeutics to clinical recommendations. Substance use and engagement in SUD care are additional outcomes. In Aim 2, population-level cost effectiveness analysis will inform the economic benefit of the implementation strategies compared to standard implementation. Implementation is monitored using formative evaluation, and sustainment will be studied for up to one year using qualitative and quantitative research methods.

DISCUSSION

The DIGITS Trial uses an experimental design to test whether implementation strategies increase and improve the delivery of digital therapeutics for SUDs when embedded in a large healthcare system. It will provide data on the potential benefits and cost-effectiveness of alternative implementation strategies.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov Identifier: NCT05160233 (Submitted 12/3/2021). https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05160233.

The Rise of Prescription Digital Therapeutics in Behavioral Health

Medicine is evolving to incorporate digital technologies of all kinds-technologies that may improve patient health, reduce clinician workload, lower costs, reduce health disparities, and expand access to needed treatments. Prescription digital therapeutics (PDTs) are an emerging technology with particular potential. These are software-based treatments delivered on mobile devices that address the behavioral dimensions of many diseases and conditions. Unlike health and wellness apps, PDTs are rigorously evaluated for safety and effectiveness and are authorized by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Nine PDTs are currently authorized to treat conditions such as substance use disorders, attention-deficit disorder, and chronic insomnia. The findings reported in two recent research papers published by Advances in Therapy related to use of PDTs for substance use disorder and opioid use disorder provide real-world evidence of clinical and cost effectiveness, strengthening the evidence base for these technologies and suggesting a role for these technologies in the efforts to help patients recover from these often-chronic and deadly conditions.

Real-World Reductions in Healthcare Resource Utilization over 6 Months in Patients with Substance Use Disorders Treated with a Prescription Digital Therapeutic

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Substance use disorders (SUDs) affect approximately 40.3 million people in the USA, yet only approximately 19% receive evidence-based treatment each year. reSET^® is a prescription digital therapeutic (PDT) and the only FDA-authorized treatment for patients with cocaine, cannabis, and stimulant use disorders. This study evaluated real-world healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and associated costs 6 months after initiation of reSET in patients with SUD.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of HealthVerity PrivateSource20 data compared the 6-month incidence of all-cause hospital facility encounters and clinician services in patients treated with reSET (re-SET cohort) before (pre-index period) and after (post-index period) reSET initiation (index). Incidence was compared using incidence rate ratios (IRR). HCRU-related costs were also assessed.

RESULTS

The sample included 101 patients (median age 37 years, 50.5% female, 54.5% Medicaid-insured). A statistically significant decrease of 50% was observed in overall hospital encounters from pre-index to post-index (IRR 0.50; 95% CI 0.37-0.67; P < 0.001), which included inpatient stays (56% decrease; IRR 0.44; 95% CI 0.26-0.76; P = 0.003), partial hospitalizations (57% decrease; IRR 0.43; 95% CI 0.21-0.88; P = 0.021), and emergency department visits (45% decrease; IRR 0.55; 95% CI 0.38-0.80; P < 0.004). Additionally, some clinician services declined significantly including pathology and laboratory services: other (54% decrease; IRR 0.46; 95% CI 0.28-0.76; P = 0.003); pathology and laboratory services: drug assays prior to opioid medication prescription (37% decrease; IRR 0.63; 95% CI 0.41-0.96; P = 0.031); and alcohol and drug abuse: medication services (46% decrease; IRR 0.54; 95% CI 0.41-0.70; P < 0.001). Reductions in facility-encounters drove 6-month reSET per-patient cost reductions of $3591 post-index compared to pre-index.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of reSET by patients with SUD is associated with durable reductions in HCRU and lower healthcare costs over 6 months compared to the 6 months before PDT treatment, after adjusting for covariates, providing an economic benefit to the healthcare system.