Ocular Adverse Events Induced by Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Comprehensive Pharmacovigilance Analysis

Real-world incidence of incident noninfectious uveitis in patients treated with BRAF inhibitors: a nationwide clinical cohort study

PURPOSE

To compare the incidence of noninfectious uveitis in skin melanoma or lung cancer patients who received BRAF inhibitors with that in those who received immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) or conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy.

DESIGN

Nationwide population-based retrospective clinical cohort study METHODS: From the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database of South Korea, we retrospectively defined 77,323 patients with skin melanoma or lung cancer who received BRAF inhibitor therapy (BRAF inhibitor-exposed group; n = 396), ICIs (ICI-exposed group; n = 22,474), or conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy (unexposed group; n = 54,453). We calculated the 1-year cumulative incidence of noninfectious uveitis in each group from the first day of BRAF inhibitor, ICI, or cytotoxic agent administration.

RESULTS

During the first year of treatment initiation, the cumulative incidence of uveitis was 0.33%, 0.35%, and 2.27% in the unexposed, ICI-exposed, and BRAF inhibitor-exposed groups, respectively. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) indicated a 7.52-fold and 5.68-fold increased risk of uveitis in the BRAF inhibitor-exposed group compared with that in the unexposed and ICI-exposed groups (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.83-14.75, P < 0.001 and 95% CI 2.81-11.47, P < 0.001, respectively). After 1:4 propensity score matching, aHRs showed a 35.51-fold and 15.80-fold increased risk (95% CI 4.49-280.48, P = 0.001 and 95% CI 1.76-141.00, P = 0.014) of uveitis and severe uveitis, respectively, in the BRAF inhibitor-exposed versus unexposed patients. Crossover analysis within the BRAF inhibitor-exposed group showed a 3.71-fold increase in uveitis risk during 1-year post index date in comparison with 1-year prior to index date (95% CI 1.03-13.40, P = 0.046). In the BRAF inhibitor-exposed group, female sex, chronic kidney disease, and melanoma were associated with a trend of increased, albeit nonsignificant, risk of uveitis.

CONCLUSIONS

Melanoma or lung cancer patients treated with BRAF inhibitors showed significantly higher risk of noninfectious uveitis than patients treated with conventional cytotoxic drugs or ICIs. These findings emphasize the importance of pretreatment patient education on BRAF-inhibitor-associated uveitis risk to enable prompt ophthalmic evaluation and treatment if symptoms arise during drug administration.

Neuro-ophthalmic complications of modern anti-cancer drugs

PURPOSE

Targeted cancer therapies have been responsible for a dramatic shift in treatment strategies for cancer, and the number of drugs, classes, and indications are continually growing. Neuro-ophthalmic complications of these medications are an uncommon but important subset of adverse events which profoundly impact vision. This review aims to collate studies and reports of known neuro-ophthalmic complications of targeted therapies and describe their management.

METHODS

The anti-cancer drugs included in the review were any drugs targeting specific molecules involved in the cancer disease process. PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science were searched using the generic names of each drug and keywords of neuro-ophthalmic conditions. The prescribing information published by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for each drug was also reviewed.

RESULTS

Several classes of targeted anti-cancer drugs were found to cause neuro-ophthalmic adverse effects. Immune checkpoint inhibitors are responsible for a raft of immune-related adverse events such as optic neuritis, ischemic optic neuropathy, PRES, and myasthenia gravis. Therapies with anti-VEGF activity can provoke posterior reversible leukoencephalopathy, which commonly presents with visual loss and can be fatal if not treated promptly. Inhibitors of BCR-ABL1, VEGF, ALK, and proteasomes have all been linked to optic nerve disorders which can have debilitating consequences for vision.

CONCLUSION

The neuro-ophthalmic complications of modern anti-cancer drugs can limit or necessitate the withdrawal of these life-prolonging medications. Ophthalmologists should be alert for neuro-ophthalmic complications in these medications to facilitate prompt diagnosis and treatment and reduce the risk of severe and permanent consequences.

Blind Spots in Therapy: Unveiling Drug-Induced Angle-Closure Glaucoma Through a National Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To identify and quantify medications causing angle-closure glaucoma through the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

DESIGN

National retrospective database analysis.

SUBJECTS

There were 11 737 133 total adverse event reports from the FDA Federal Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database 2004 to third quarter of 2023 (2023Q3), which included 1629 reports of angle-closure glaucoma.

METHODS

Drugs associated with reports of angle-closure glaucoma were identified in FAERS through disproportionality analysis MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: To ascertain if these reports yielded statistically significant signals, we used the proportional reporting ratio (PRR), reporting odds ratio (ROR), empirical Bayes geometric mean (EBGM), and information component (IC). We considered a signal to be detected when all 4 disproportionality analysis metrics were positive.

RESULTS

We identified a total of 1629 adverse event reports linked to 611 suspected drugs over the course of 20 years (2004-2023Q3). Frequently reported drugs included topiramate (520 reports) and citalopram (69 reports), amongst many others. Eighteen medications yielded a positive signal, including lesser-known medications like olanzapine, phentermine, and ranibizumab. Tropicamide exhibited the most robust statistical significance (n = 18; PRR: 164.263; ROR [95% confidence interval {CI}]: 167.95 [104.994-268.655]; EBGM [EBGM05]: 162.421 [109.5]; IC [IC05]: 7.344 [4.591]), while acetazolamide was the second strongest (n = 51; PRR: 113.088; ROR 95% CI: 114.782 [86.665-152.021]; EBGM [EBGM05]: 109.506 [86.501]; IC [IC05]: 6.775 [5.115]).

CONCLUSIONS

Drug-induced glaucoma included both well-known medications such as topiramate as well as lesser-known medications such as olanzapine, phentermine, and ranibizumab. Clinician awareness of these findings is important.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Diagnosing and Managing Uveitis Associated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Review

This review aims to provide an understanding of the diagnostic and therapeutic challenges of uveitis associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). In the wake of these molecules being increasingly employed as a treatment against different cancers, cases of uveitis post-ICI therapy have also been increasingly reported in the literature, warranting an extensive exploration of the clinical presentations, risk factors, and pathophysiological mechanisms of ICI-induced uveitis. This review further provides an understanding of the association between ICIs and uveitis, and assesses the efficacy of current diagnostic tools, underscoring the need for advanced techniques to enable early detection and accurate assessment. Further, it investigates the therapeutic strategies for ICI-related uveitis, weighing the benefits and limitations of existing treatment regimens, and discussing current challenges and emerging therapies in the context of their potential efficacy and side effects. Through an overview of the short-term and long-term outcomes, this article suggests recommendations and emphasizes the importance of multidisciplinary collaboration between ophthalmologists and oncologists. Finally, the review highlights promising avenues for future research and development in the field, potentially informing transformative approaches in the ocular assessment of patients under immunotherapy and the management of uveitis following ICI therapy.

Neurologic manifestations of autoimmunity with immune checkpoint inhibitors

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are cancer immunotherapies that enhance the body's own immune system to treat cancer. ICI treatment, however, can cause immune-related adverse events (irAEs) that can affect any organ, resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. Neurologic irAEs (nirAEs) are rare and can affect the peripheral nervous system more commonly than the central nervous system. Treatment is dependent on the severity of the neurologic manifestations and often includs discontinuation of the ICI and initiation of steroid therapy as the first line; other treatments have also been used. NirAEs and cardiac irAEs have higher fatality rates underlying the importance of early recognition and appropriate management. This chapter reviews the clinical manifestations of neurologic immune-related adverse events associated with ICI treatment as well as diagnostic and therapeutic modalities.

Ocular surface toxicities associated with modern anticancer therapies

Cancer treatments have recently shifted from broad-spectrum cytotoxic therapies to more focused treatments, maximizing anti-cancerous activity while reducing toxicity to healthy cells. These modern anticancer therapies (MATs) encompass a wide range of innovative molecules that mainly include immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and targeted anticancer therapies (TATs), comprising antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) and inhibitors of signal transduction (IST). Some MATs are associated with ocular surface (OS) adverse events (AEs) that can cause severe discomfort and even lead to loss of vision. While these complications remain rare, they're probably underreported. It is likely that both oncologists and ophthalmologists will come across MATs-associated OS-AEs in their practices, due to the increasing number of patients being treated with MATs. Rapid identification of OS-AEs is crucial, as early intervention can manage these conditions to avoid vision loss and reduce negative impacts on quality of life (QoL). We discuss characteristics of OS pathologies attributed to MATs, describe the suspected underlying pathophysiological mechanisms, and outline the main lines of treatment.

Ocular toxicities associated with antibody drug conjugates and immunotherapy in oncology: clinical presentation, pathogenesis, and management strategies

INTRODUCTION

The development of molecularly targeted anticancer therapies and immunotherapy continues to revolutionize the treatment of cancer. FDA accelerated approvals of novel targeted therapies allowed for introduction of these agents into the clinic at a rapid rate. On-and off-target ocular toxicities are prevalent treatment-related adverse events of newer therapies including antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) and immunotherapy. Ocular toxicities associated with ADCs and immunotherapy have heterogeneous presentations and pathogenesis requiring unique and often complex monitoring, and management.

AREAS COVERED

In this article, we provide an updated review of treatment-emergent ocular toxicity associated with new and novel oncologic therapies and summarize guidelines and best practice strategies for prevention, monitoring and management. A literature search was performed through PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, and FDA website (1 January 2017 to 10 May 2023) to identify relevant information.

EXPERT OPINION

The implementation of a strategy for monitoring, prevention, and management of treatment-related ocular toxicities involves a multi-disciplinary, often cross-center approach. Communication with infusion nursing leadership, clinic staff, and eye care providers is crucial to the successful implementation of eye care plans to prevent and manage ocular toxicity.

[Ocular side effects of modern oncological therapy : Immunological checkpoint and MEK/BRAF signal transduction inhibitors]

In recent years, checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized the treatment of previously untreatable malignant tumors, significantly improving the life expectancy as well as quality of life in many cases. Checkpoint inhibitors comprise a group of drugs with different mechanisms of action. These include immunological checkpoint inhibitors (iCPI) and intracellular signal transduction inhibitors; however, both substance classes can cause inflammatory or toxic ocular side effects. The frequency of intraocular inflammation (uveitis) is reported to be ca. 1-2%, toxic side effects were observed in up to more than 50% of the patients treated with signal transduction inhibitors. In the following article the main mechanisms of these forms of treatment are characterized. Furthermore, this article presents the currently most frequently used therapeutic agents and their typical ophthalmological side effects to increase awareness and to draw attention to these still rare but increasingly more frequent findings.

Pembrolizumab-induced optic neuropathy - a case report

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment has become important for treating various cancer types, including Hodgkin's lymphoma. However, ICI can overstimulate the immune system, leading to a broad range of immunological side effects, known as immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Here, we report a case of optic neuropathy caused by pembrolizumab.

Case presentation

A patient with Hodgkin's lymphoma received pembrolizumab every three weeks. Twelve days after the sixth cycle of pembrolizumab, the patient was admitted to the emergency department with blurred vision, visual field impairment and altered color perception affecting the right eye. The diagnosis of immune-related optic neuropathy was established. Pembrolizumab was stopped permanently and high-dose steroid treatment was immediately started. This emergency treatment led to a satisfactory binocular vision and an improvement of visual acuity testing results. After another 7 months, the left eye was affected with the same symptoms. At this time, only an extended immunosuppressive therapy consisting of high-dose steroid treatment, plasmapheresis, immunoglobulin treatment, retrobulbar injection of steroids and mycophenolate mofetil, successfully reduced the symptoms.

Conclusions

This case highlights the need for prompt recognition and treatment of rare irAEs, such as optic neuropathy. Urgent treatment with initial high-dose steroid treatment is required to avoid persistent loss of visual acuity. Options for further treatment are mainly based on small case series and case reports. In our case, a retrobulbar injection of steroids in combination with mycophenolate mofetil showed significant success in treating steroid-refractory optic neuropathy.

Evaluation of uveitis events in real-world patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors based on the FAERS database

PURPOSE

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have emerged as a novel class of drugs carrying a potential risk of uveitis. Due to the rarity, current knowledge on this safety issue is still incomplete. This study employed the post-marketing surveillance data to comprehensively describe and assess the uveitis events after the use of ICIs.

METHODS

Data between 2004 and 2021 were downloaded from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), and the uveitis events reported for ICIs were identified and included in this study. Clinical details of these reports were collected and analyzed. Four data mining methods were utilized to investigate the potential associations between uveitis and different ICI regimens.

RESULTS

Overall, 461 uveitis cases after exposure to ICI therapies were reported. Melanoma (58.79%) was revealed as the most common indication for receiving ICIs. The median onset time of uveitis was 41 (interquartile range 18-91) days after ICI initiation. 9.54% of these cases resulted in disability. Data mining results showed 5 ICIs generated positive uveitis signals when used alone. Ipilimumab yielded the most noticeable uveitis signal with the highest reporting odds ratio (ROR = 6.73, 95% two-sided CI = 5.26, 8.60), proportional reporting ratio (PRR = 6.69, χ²=308.52), information component (IC = 2.74, IC025 = 2.14) and empirical Bayes geometric mean (EBGM = 6.66, EBGM05 = 5.42), followed by pembrolizumab, cemiplimab, nivolumab and atezolizumab. When nivolumab, pembrolizumab or atezolizumab was administrated together with ipilimumab, obviously stronger uveitis signal was detected than that for either of them.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provided an overview of the clinical features of ICI-related uveitis cases in the FAERS. Data mining results revealed that positive uveitis signals commonly existed within this drug class, but signal strength varied among ICIs. When ICIs were used in a combined way, uveitis signals became obviously stronger. Therefore, early ophthalmic monitoring is important when applying ICIs to patients, especially those with a tendency for uveitis, such as melanoma patients.

Ocular adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors, a scoping review

INTRODUCTION

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become an important part of the treatment of multiple cancers, especially for advanced melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer. Some tumors are capable of escaping immunosurveillance by stimulating checkpoints on T-cells. ICIs prevent activation of these checkpoints and thereby stimulate the immune system and indirectly the anti-tumor response. However, the use of ICIs is associated with various adverse events. Ocular side effects are rare but may have a major impact on the quality of life of the patient.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search of the medical databases Web of Science, Embase and PubMed was performed. Articles that provided a comprehensive description of a case report containing 1) cancer patient(s) treated with (a combination of) immune checkpoint inhibitors, and 2) assessed occurrence of ocular adverse events, were included. A total of 290 case reports were included.

RESULTS

Melanoma (n = 179; 61.7%) and lung cancer (n = 56; 19.3%) were the most frequent reported malignancies. The primary used ICIs were nivolumab (n = 123; 42.5%) and ipilimumab (n = 116; 40.0%). Uveitis was most the common adverse event (n = 134; 46.2%) and mainly related to melanoma. Neuro-ophthalmic disorders, including myasthenia gravis and cranial nerve disorders, were the second most common adverse events (n = 71; 24.5%), mainly related to lung cancer. Adverse events affecting the orbit and the cornea were reported in 33 (11.4%) and 30 cases (10.3%) respectively. Adverse events concerning the retina were reported in 26 cases (9.0%).

CONCLUSION

The aim of this paper is to provide an overview of all reported ocular adverse events related to the use of ICIs. The insights retrieved from this review might contribute to a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms of these ocular adverse events. Particularly, the difference between actual immune-related adverse events and paraneoplastic syndromes might be relevant. These findings might be of great value in establishing guidelines on how to manage ocular adverse events related to ICIs.

Outcome of Nivolumab-Induced Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada Disease-Like Uveitis in a Patient Managed without Intravenous Methylprednisolone Therapy

Background

In recent years, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have been often used for several types of cancers. Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are autoimmune responses caused by ICI. Among the different types of irAEs, uveitis is common in ophthalmology. Moreover, there are reports on Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada (VKH) disease-like uveitis. In most cases, VKH, as in the usual VKH, is managed with intravenous methylprednisolone therapy. Case Report. A 72-year-old man was diagnosed with gastric cancer, and he was treated with nivolumab, a type of ICI. After eight cycles of nivolumab therapy, he developed fulminant type 1 diabetes mellitus and diabetic ketoacidosis. Thus, the treatment was discontinued. Subsequently, the patient was referred to our department due to bilateral blurry vision. He had decreased visual acuity in both eyes, and slit lamp examination revealed the presence of bilateral anterior chamber cells and keratic precipitates. Fundus examination showed bilateral serous retinal detachment (SRD), wavy retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), and choroidal thickening. Cerebrospinal fluid examination revealed prominent pleocytosis. Thus, we initiated eye drop therapy and subtenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide on the right eye only. After 1 month, SRD and wavy RPE disappeared, and the patient's visual acuity improved. Further, both eyes had similar improvements in visual acuity and abnormal findings. Oral prednisolone was subsequently administered for hearing loss. However, intravenous methylprednisolone was not used, and ophthalmologic findings and visual acuity did not change before and after systemic steroid therapy. One year after disease onset, SRD and wavy RPE did not relapse.

Conclusion

Nivolumab-induced VKH disease-like uveitis can have good outcomes even in a patient managed without intravenous methylprednisolone therapy.

Ophthalmic immune-related adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

Purpose

To investigate the incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy and to report the clinical features, management, and outcomes of ophthalmic irAEs.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who received ICI therapy from January 2016 to September 2022 at Peking Union Medical College Hospital and analyzed the incidence of systemic and ophthalmic adverse effects of this therapy.

Results

Of 962 patients, 248 (25.8%) experienced irAEs. The first-year incidences of total irAEs and ophthalmic irAEs were 23.5% and 1.1%. The most common ICI received by the patients was pembrolizumab (373; 38.8%). Nearly half of the patients (477; 49.6%) had lung cancer. Combination therapy was associated with an increased incidence of irAEs without statistical significance. Patients with lung cancer presented with an increased incidence of total irAEs (p = 0.003) and ophthalmic irAEs (p = 0.032). Eleven patients had ophthalmic manifestations, including ophthalmoplegia (6/11), conjunctivitis (3/11), reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation (RCCEP) (1/11), and orbital inflammation (1/11). Eight patients had concomitant extra-ophthalmic irAEs. Furthermore, ICIs were discontinued in nine patients, and most ophthalmic manifestations were well controlled with topical and systemic steroids. Ten patients were treated with intravenous or oral steroids. However, cancer progression occurred in five out of eleven patients after the interruption of ICIs.

Conclusion

IrAEs are correlated with ICI regimens and underlying neoplasia. In our Chinese cohort, patients have a higher risk of ophthalmoplegia than uveitis. Early recognition and multidisciplinary consultation are crucial for optimal treatment of ophthalmic irAEs.

Cardiac arrhythmias associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: A comprehensive disproportionality analysis of the FDA adverse event reporting system

Introduction: With the widespread application of Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), it is important to explore the association between ICIs and cardiac arrhythmias and to characterize the clinical features of ICI-associated cardiac arrhythmias in real-world studies. Objective: The purpose of this study was to characterize the main features of ICI-related cardiac arrhythmias. Methods: From January 2017 to June 2021, data in the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database were retrieved to conduct the disproportionality analysis. For the ICI-related cardiac arrhythmia detection, signals were detected by reporting odds ratio (ROR) and information component (IC), calculated using two-by-two contingency tables The clinical characteristics of patients reported with ICI-related cardiac arrhythmias were compared between fatal and non-fatal groups, and the time to onset (TTO) following different ICI regimens was further investigated. Multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between concurrent cardiotoxicities and ICI-associated arrhythmias. Results: We identified a total of 1957 ICI-associated cardiac arrhythmias reports which appeared to influence more men (64.44%) than women (30.76%), with a median age of 68 [interquartile range (IQR) 60-75] years. Cardiac arrhythmias were reported most often in patients with lung, pleura, thymus and heart cancers (38.02% of 1957 patients). Compared with the full database, ICIs were detected with pharmacovigilance of cardiac arrhythmias (ROR025 = 1.16, IC025 = 0.19). Anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 monotherapies were found to be related to higher reporting of arrhythmias, corresponding to ROR025 = 1.03, IC025 = 0.06 and ROR025 = 1.27, IC025 = 0.29, respectively, with the exception of anti-CTLA-4 monotherapies (ROR025 = 0.57, IC025 = -1.21). The spectrum of arrhythmias induced by ICIs differed among therapeutic regimens. There was no significant difference in the onset time between monotherapy and combination regimen. Moreover, reports of ICI-associated arrhythmias were associated with other concurrent cardiotoxicity, including cardiac failure [ROR 2.61 (2.20-3.09)], coronary artery disorders [ROR 2.28 (1.83-2.85)], myocardial disorders [ROR 5.25 (4.44-6.22)], pericardial disorders [ROR 2.76 (2.09-3.64)] and cardiac valve disorders [ROR 3.21 (1.34-7.68)]. Conclusion: ICI monotherapy and combination therapy can lead to cardiac arrhythmias that can result in serious outcomes and tend to occur early. Our findings underscore the importance of early recognition and management of ICI-related cardiac arrhythmias.

Case report: Immune-mediated meibomian gland dysfunction following pembrolizumab therapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma

Ocular immune-related adverse events are a relatively rare complication of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Common ocular toxicities range from dry eyes to inflammatory uveitis and ocular myasthenia gravis. Here, we present the case of a 55-year-old woman with recurrent urothelial carcinoma of the ureter after initially being managed with neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy and surgical resection. She was treated with pembrolizumab which was complicated by immune-mediated pneumonitis after the eighth cycle, which was managed with a prolonged steroid course. The patient also developed red eyes along with recurrent styes. Eye examination revealed decreased tear breakup time, expression of thick and turbid meibum, and meibomian gland atrophy on infrared meibography. The patient was diagnosed with suspected immune-mediated meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) as a result of pembrolizumab, a previously unreported complication of immunotherapy. The goal of MGD therapy is to stabilize the tear film and minimize evaporation with lipid-based lubricants and other conservative treatments.

Uveitis in Tumor Patients Treated with Immunological Checkpoint- and Signal Transduction Pathway-Inhibitors

PURPOSE

New tumor therapies like immune checkpoint inhibitors and small molecule inhibitors of MEK and BRAF have increased the patient's survival rate but can be burdened with severe side-effects including uveitis. Here, we show the spectrum, treatment, and outcome of uveitis types induced by tumor treatment.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we have included 54 patients from different centers who were developing uveitis under tumor therapy. A 16-item questionnaire was analyzed for type, treatment, and outcome of uveitis and type of tumor treatment, which we have correlated here.

RESULTS

Irrespective of the tumor treatment, most patients developed anterior uveitis. All patients received corticosteroids and some additional immunosuppressive treatments. Cessation of tumor therapy was necessary only in a minority of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Ocular autoimmunity should be differentiated from toxic effects of cancer treatment and timely recognized since it can be generally well controlled by anti-inflammatory treatment, preserving the patient's vision without cessation of the tumor treatment.

Ocular Inflammation Induced by Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Ocular immunotherapy-related adverse events (IRAEs), although rare, can be sight-threatening. Our objective was to analyze ocular IRAEs diagnosed in France from the marketing of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPIs) until June 2021 and to review the literature. We collected the cases of 28 patients (36 ocular IRAEs), occurring after an average of 17 weeks (±19). Forty-six percent of patients were treated for metastatic melanoma. Anti-PD1 agents were responsible for 57% of the IRAEs. Anterior uveitis was the most common (44%), followed by panuveitis (28%). Of 25 uveitis cases, 80% were bilateral and 60% were granulomatous. We found one case with complete Vogt-Koyanagi–Harada syndrome and one case of birdshot retinochoroidopathy. The other IRAEs were eight ocular surface disorders, one optic neuropathy, and one inflammatory orbitopathy. Seventy percent of the IRAEs were grade 3 according to the common terminology of AEs. ICPIs were discontinued in 60% of patients and 50% received local corticosteroids alone. The literature review included 230 uveitis cases, of which 7% were granulomatous. The distributions of ICPIs, cancer, and type of uveitis were similar to our cohort. Ocular IRAEs appeared to be easily controlled by local or systemic corticosteroids and did not require routine discontinuation of ICPIs. Further work is still warranted to define the optimal management of ocular IRAEs.

A Case of Bilateral Diffuse Uveal Melanocytic Proliferation in the Setting of Urothelial Carcinoma of the Ureter: A Failed Response to Plasmapheresis

Bilateral diffuse uveal melanocytic proliferation (BDUMP) is a rare paraneoplastic syndrome. Diagnosis can be difficult and treatment guidelines are ill-defined. A 73-year-old man with poorly differentiated high grade urothelial carcinoma of the ureter metastatic to the liver, lungs, lymph nodes, and pelvis treated with chemotherapy and immunotherapy reported gradual vision loss. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) demonstrated intraretinal and subretinal fluid with hyperreflective subretinal deposits and focal, deeply pigmented choroidal lesions. Irregular hyperpigmentation of the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) with a "leopard spot" pattern on fundus autofluorescence (FAF) supported the diagnosis of BDUMP. Multiple plasmapheresis sessions did not result in sustained clinical improvement. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2022;53(6): 350-353.].

[Induction of Uveitis by Immune-Oncologic Therapies, Namely Checkpoint Inhibitors]

BACKGROUND

The recently introduced tumor therapies including immune checkpoint and BRAF/MEK inhibitors (ICI) have substantially contributed to survival and quality of life of the affected patients, but are associated with class-specific, non-toxic immune-related side effects including uveitis. This narrative review focusses to summarize the immune-related adverse event profile associated with the use of ICI.

METHODS

A literature search in PubMed, the publication database of the National Institute of Health in the USA (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed) used the search terms "uveitis" AND "drug-induced" AND/OR "immune checkpoint inhibitor". All articles published in the last five years and the for the purpose of this review relevant cross references were evaluated.

RESULTS

A class-specific phenomenon of ICI and BRAF/MEK inhibitors is their capability to induce systemic and ocular autoimmunity. Ocular side effects are observed in up to 3% of patients and should be differentiated from toxic side effects, since this is not dose-dependent. Melanoma as underlying disease and Pembrolizumab as ICI significantly increase the risk. If timely recognized, systemic treatment with corticosteroids allows to preserve vision without cessation of the tumor treatment in more than 90% of these potentially life-threatening instances.

CONCLUSION

Given their impact onto the survival of cancer and namely melanoma patients, ICI and BRAF/MEK inhibitors are increasingly used alone and in combination, which enhances their inherent risk of developing drug-induced ocular autoimmunity. Favorable functional outcomes are closely linked to early recognition and aggressive treatment of these complications considering the fact that these immune-related adverse events affect multiple organ systems and have an untreated lethality of up to 3%.

Dynamic observation: Immune-privileged microenvironment limited the effectiveness of immunotherapy in an intraocular metastasis mouse model

Introduction: Intraocular metastasis (IM) occurred in approximately 8-10% of patients with metastatic malignancy, for whom oncological immunotherapies showed poor visual potential. However, the mechanism for that inefficiency remains unclear and requires further exploration. Methods: we established a novel mouse model of intraocular metastasis by intracarotid injection of cutaneous melanoma cells. We investigated disease progression using ophthalmic and histological examinations. We used combined anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA4 antibodies for immunotherapy and evaluate the therapeutic effects in mice model. In addition, we characterized the immune microenvironment of tumor infiltrating CD8+ T by fluorescence staining and assessed their cytotoxicity by flow cytometry. Results: All mice presented IM in the left eye, while the right eye was healthy. Uveal tissues with rich vascularity (e.g., the iris, ciliary body, and choroid) initiated intraocular metastasis at an early stage, and intraocular metastasis development resulted in several secondary changes, including corneal swelling, retinal detachment, and intratumoral haemorrhage. Immunotherapy could inhibit intraocular metastasis, prolong the time to eye rupture but did not prevent rupture ending. This inefficiency might be attributed to ocular tissues specificities that inhibited CD8+ T cells infiltration via PD-L1 expression. PD-L1low corneal tissue resisted tumor invasion with high levels of CD8+ T cells infiltration, whereas CD8+ T cells were deficient in PD-L1high uveal metastasis. Furthermore, we found a significantly increased PD-1+/- CD4+ and PD-1+/- CD8+ T cells infiltrating the intratumoral haemorrhage area. Although these CD8+ T cells in the IM were not exhausted and had a higher capacity of cytotoxicity (higher Interferon-γ ratio) than CD8+ T cells in the blood, FasL+ PD-L1+ ocular tissue can strongly inhibit these IM infiltrating T cells. Conclusions: Immunotherapy can inhibit the disease progression of intraocular metastasis. Enhancing the effects of tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cells should be one of the highest potentials to improve the visual potential.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Treatment and Ophthalmologist Consultations in Patients with Malignant Melanoma or Lung Cancer-A Nationwide Cohort Study

PURPOSE

To estimate the frequency of first-time ocular events in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI).

METHODS

Patients with cancer in 2011-2018 in Denmark were included and followed. The outcomes were first-time ophthalmologist consultation and ocular inflammation. One-year absolute risks of outcomes and hazard ratios were estimated.

RESULTS

112,289 patients with cancer were included, and 2195 were treated with ICI. One year after the first ICI treatment, 6% of the patients with cancer, 5% and 8% of the lung cancer (LC) and malignant cutaneous melanoma (MM) patients, respectively, had a first-time ophthalmologist consultation. The risk of ocular inflammation was 1% (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.4-1.2). Among patients with MM, ICI was associated with ocular inflammation in women (HR 12.6 (95% CI 5.83-27.31) and men (4.87 (95% CI 1.79-13.29)). Comparing patients with and without ICI treatment, the risk of first-time ophthalmologist consultation was increased in patients with LC (HR 1.74 (95% CI 1.29-2.34) and MM (HR 3.21 (95% CI 2.31-4.44).

CONCLUSIONS

The one-year risks of first-time ophthalmologist consultation and ocular inflammation were 6% and 1%, respectively, in patients treated with ICI. In patients with LC and MM, the risk was increased in patients with ICI compared with patients without ICI.

Ocular Immune-Related Adverse Events Associated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Lung Cancer

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are novel immunotherapy-based drugs that have become increasingly popular in the treatment of lung cancer. Researchers have recognized ocular immune-related adverse events (irAEs) secondary to ICIs because of their vision-threatening characteristics. However, they are incompletely characterized and no studies have reported the ICI-related ocular irAEs in lung cancer. Therefore, we aimed to comprehensively illustrate the clinical characteristics, contributory factors, diagnosis, and management of ICI-related ocular irAEs in lung cancer, based on previously reported 79 patients. Ophthalmoplegia (40.51%), uveitis (20.25%), and dry eye (17.72%) were the most common ICI-related ocular irAEs in lung cancer. Ptosis was the most common (36.71%) and the highest mortality (23.33%) of ophthalmoplegia. Patients in Asia and patients who underwent combination therapy with programmed cell death-1 and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 inhibitors demonstrated significantly higher frequency of ophthalmoplegia than other ocular irAEs. Most ICI-related ophthalmoplegia and uveitis in lung cancer were observed in the first 10 weeks following the initiation of ICIs. Furthermore, the onset time of dry eye and other ocular irAEs was much longer. In addition, 92.31% of the patients with ocular irAEs other than ophthalmoplegia could be remised. In conclusion, ocular irAEs secondary to ICIs in lung cancer are non-negligible, particularly ophthalmoplegia. Ethnicity and the type of ICIs play important roles in the distribution of ocular irAEs. ICI-related ophthalmoplegia in lung cancer presented with early onset and worse prognosis features, thus necessitating further attention.

Risk of Ophthalmic Adverse Events in Patients Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Regimens: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) -induced adverse events (AEs) have been reported affecting almost all human organs. However, studies about ocular AEs are few. A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the risks of ICI-related ophthalmic AEs compare to chemotherapy.Methods: Eligible studies were selected from phase II/III randomized controlled trials investigating ICIs. The data were analyzed by R software and Stata.Results: Odds ratio of treatment-related AE (trAEs) and nonspecific ophthalmic trAEs (NS-trAEs) were lower for PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors than chemotherapy (OR 0.44, p < .05; OR 0.28, p < .001; OR 0.18, p < . 05; OR: 0.18, p < .001respectively). Compared with monotherapy, PD-1 plus CTLA-4 inhibitors increased the risks of immune-related AEs (irAEs) (OR 4.52, p < .01); ICIs plus chemotherapy increased the risks of trAEs and irAEs (OR 2.82, p < .001; OR 3.63, p < .05 respectively).Conclusions: PD-L1/PD-1 inhibitors had lower risks of trAEs and NS-trAEs than chemotherapy; Compared with monotherapy, combination therapy had higher risks of ophthalmic trAEs and irAEs.Abbreviation PD-1: programmed cell death protein 1; PD-L1: programmed cell death protein ligand 1; CTLA-4: cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4; ICI: immune checkpoint inhibitor; AE: adverse event; trAE: treatment-related adverse event;irAE: immune-related adverse events; NS-trAE: nonspecific ophthalmic treatment-related adverse event; RCT: randomized controlled trials; PFS: progression-free survival; OS: overall survival; ORR: objective response rate; MM: melanoma; NSCLC: non-small cell lung cancer; SCLC: small cell lung cancer; HNSCC: head-neck squamous cell carcinoma; PICOL: patient, intervention, comparison, and outcome; Versus: VS; Chem: chemotherapy; 95%CI: 95% confidence interval; FEM: fixed-effects model; REM: random-effects model; NA: not applicable; MeSH: medical subject heading.

Pharmacologically induced uveitis

Treatments of numerous systemic and local diseases of different etiologies may be accompanied by an unwanted side effect in the form of uveitis. We inform readers about medications that have the potential to cause uveitis and analyze the strength of association of these medications with uveitis. Subsequently, cessation of medication or appropriate treatment can be individualized for each patient for the purpose of preventing further damage to tissue structure and function. Being aware of these associations, physicians may readily identify medications that may cause uveitis and avoid expensive and unnecessary clinical and laboratory testing.