Severity of Visual Field Loss at First Presentation to Glaucoma Clinics in England and Tanzania

Comparison of disease severity in glaucoma patients identified by screening in the 1990s and in routine clinical care in the 2010s in Sweden

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

In a previous study comparing the amount of visual field damage at presentation in patients having open-angle glaucoma (OAG) identified through screening and in patients diagnosed in routine clinical practice in the 1990s, the damage was considerably worse in the clinically diagnosed patients. In the present study we compare visual field damage at presentation in the same 402 screened patients with that seen in 281 newly detected previously untreated patients clinically diagnosed in the 2010s.

METHODS

The perimetric visual field index mean deviation (MD) was compared in the two groups of patients.

RESULTS

In the clinical patients diagnosed with bilateral visual field damage the median MD was -5.1 dB in the better eye and -13.0 dB in the worse eye. In the screened patients the median MD in the better eye was -6.5 dB and -11.5 dB in the worse eye. The differences between the clinical and screened patients were non-significant, p = 0.28 and p = 0.67 respectively. More clinical patients had severe visual field loss, defined as MD less than -20 dB, in the worse eye than in the screened patients, 18.5% versus 12.7% respectively, p = 0.037.

CONCLUSION

The visual field damage at presentation in clinically diagnosed OAG patients has improved in the past 20 years, but the proportion of patients with severe visual field loss in at least one eye, almost 20%, is still unacceptably high considering that severe visual field damage at presentation is the most important risk factor for later development of glaucoma blindness.

Differentiating stages of functional vision loss from glaucoma using the Disc Damage Likelihood Scale and cup:disc ratio

BACKGROUND

Glaucoma staging is critical for treatment planning but has rarely been tested in severe/end-stage disease. We compared the performance of the Disc Damage Likelihood Scale (DDLS) and cup:disc ratio (CDR) using a functional glaucoma staging system (GSS) as the reference standard.

METHODS

Post hoc analysis of a randomised controlled trial at the Eye Department of Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, Tanzania. Eligible participants (aged ≥18 years) with open-angle glaucoma, intraocular pressure (IOP) of >21 mm Hg, were randomised to timolol 0.5% eye drops or selective laser trabeculoplasty. Fundoscopy established vertical and horizontal CDRs and DDLS. Visual acuity and static visual fields were graded (GSS). The study used area under the receiver operating characteristic (AROC) curves and Spearman's rank correlation coefficients to compare staging systems. Logistic regression with generalised estimating equations determined risk factors of functional severe/end-stage glaucoma.

RESULTS

382 eyes (201 participants) were evaluated; 195 (51%) had severe or end-stage glaucoma; mean IOP was 26.7 (SD 6.9) mm Hg. DDLS yielded an AROC of 0.90 (95% CI 0.87 to 0.93), vertical cup:disc ratio (vCDR) of 0.88 (95% CI 0.85 to 0.91, p=0.048) for identifying severe/end-stage disease. Correlation coefficients comparing GSS to DDLS and vCDRs were 0.73 and 0.71, respectively. Advanced structural stages, vision impairment, higher IOP and less financial resources were risk factors of functional severe/end-stage glaucoma.

CONCLUSION

This study indicates that both structural staging systems can differentiate severe/end-stage glaucoma from less severe disease, with a moderate advantage of DDLS over CDR. Clinical examination of the optic disc plays an important role in addition to functional assessment when managing severe/end-stage glaucoma.

Striving Toward Better Eye Health Beyond Our Waiting Rooms: The LXXX Edward Jackson Memorial Lecture

PURPOSE

Visual impairment (VI) negatively impacts the quality of lives of individuals and the optimal health of populations, creating both human and financial costs. Yet, VI has not risen to a level that is considered a priority in population health. This analysis assesses the evidence currently available for strengthening the value proposition for eye health, particularly the demographic characteristics and patient-centered outcomes found in clinical research.

DESIGN

Retrospective cross-sectional analysis.

METHOD

Two searches of the AJO database were performed using relevant key words: Search 1 (S1): NEI-sponsored clinical trials (1970-2023); and Search 2 (S2): Quality of life (2018-2023). The Scopus Cite Score was used as a filter for each search, specifically ≥50 for S1 and ≥20 for S2.

RESULTS

Of the initial 466 articles found, 100 met the preestablished criteria. Age, sex, and race/ancestry/ethnicity were reported across glaucoma, retina, uveitis, cornea, and pediatrics subspecialties in 56% ± 9.7% of the articles; 37% ± 9.5% listed either age only or age, sex, or gender. The characterizations varied and subcategories were rarely reported. Only 2% of S1 and 25% of S2 noted patient-centered outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The characterization of study populations in the ophthalmic literature is limited by underreporting of patient-centered outcomes, useful for reaffirming the value of eye and vision health in population health. This analysis highlights the need for paying greater attention to more specific demographic categories and focusing more on patient-centered outcomes in clinical research.

Measures of multiple deprivation and visual field loss in glaucoma clinics in England: lessons from big data

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

To examine the association between multiple deprivation with late diagnosis and rapid worsening of glaucoma in patients in English hospital eye services (HES).

METHODS

602,439 visual fields (VFs) were extracted from five regionally different glaucoma clinics in England. Mean Deviation (MD) worse than -12 dB was used as a surrogate definition for advanced VF loss at diagnosis in patients with ≥2 reliable VF records. MD loss worse than -1 dB per year was used to define rapid VF progression in patients with ≥6 VFs. Patient data were stratified into deciles of the Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) from residential postcodes.

RESULTS

There was an association between IMD and advanced VF loss at diagnosis in 44,956 patients with 18% (293/1608) and 11% (771/6929) in the most and least deprived IMD decile, respectively. Age-corrected odds ratio (OR) for having advanced VF loss at entry into HES was 1.42 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.21-1.67) and 0.75 (95% CI: 0.66-0.85) in the most and least deprived IMD decile respectively (reference = fifth decile). In 15,094 patients with follow up data (median [interquartile range] of 6.9 [4.5, 10.0] years), the proportion having rapid VF progression did not differ across the IMD spectrum.

CONCLUSION

Large-scale VF data from clinics indicates that glaucoma severity at presentation to English HES is associated with levels of multiple deprivation. We found no evidence to suggest likelihood of having rapid VF progression during follow-up is associated with IMD; this hints at equity of glaucoma care and outcomes once patients are in English HES.

Validation of the RCOphth and UKEGS glaucoma risk stratification tool 'GLAUC-STRAT-fast'

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The aim of this study was to validate the Glaucoma Risk Stratification Tool (GLAUC-STRAT-fast) currently recommended by the Royal College of Ophthalmologists for the risk stratification of patients with glaucoma in the UK National Health Service Hospital Eye Service.

METHODS

GLAUC-STRAT fast was applied to the LiGHT trial participants by risk-stratifying the worse eye of each patient at baseline and after 3 years of treatment. Metrics of disease severity or treatment intensity used for the validation were: increased number of monitoring visits or treatment escalations; needing a trabeculectomy; a reduction of >2 dB in visual field mean deviation (VF MD) during the monitoring period; identification of rapid VF loss on total (TD) and/or pattern deviation (PD). The proportion of eyes within each baseline stratum for each of the above markers was compared against the other strata, using a χ2 test for proportions.

RESULTS

There was an association between the baseline stratification and the number of treatment escalations needed to maintain the eye-specific target intraocular pressure (p=0.001), the number of visits needed throughout the 3-year follow-up period (p=0.001), the need for trabeculectomy (p<0.001) and absolute loss of MD over the course of the monitoring period (p<0.001). The rate of VF progression was not associated with baseline risk stratification for TD or PD progression (p≥0.007, with Bonferroni correction).

CONCLUSION

The GLAUC-STRAT fast tool is a useful tool for risk stratifying eyes with ocular hypertension or open angle glaucoma. Further research is needed to confirm and validate its applicability to more advanced glaucomas and generalisability to clinical use.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

The LiGHT trial is registered at controlled-trials.com (ISRCTN32038223).

Factors associated with delayed first ophthalmological consultation for primary glaucoma: a qualitative interview study

Background

Glaucoma has an insidious onset with non-specific early symptoms, often leading patients to delay in seeking help. However, postponing the first ophthalmological consultation can result in delayed diagnosis and treatment, with adverse effects on vision. This study explored the factors associated with delayed first ophthalmological consultation in patients with primary glaucoma, with the overarching aim of informing measures to reduce delayed consultation and avoid the consequent adverse outcomes.

Methods

We adopted a phenomenological approach. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with patients admitted to a tertiary eye hospital in Tianjin, China, from January 2021 to April 2021. Data were analyzed by Colaizzi's seven-step method.

Results

We identified 46 patients with primary glaucoma who delayed their first ophthalmological consultation for various reasons. There were four major themes and 16 sub-themes. The major themes were as follows: (1) occult symptoms that are difficult to identify; (2) insufficient knowledge and understanding of glaucoma-related risks and harm; (3) perceived difficulties in accessing medical care; and (4) inadequate support system.

Conclusion

In order to avoid patient delay and consequent irreversible damage to the visual field in patients with primary glaucoma, it is essential that medical staff identify symptoms more effectively, change habitual medical behavior of the patients, adopt a medical union model, and promote the use of a social medical support system to address practical difficulties in delivering adequate care.

Performance of a Glaucoma Screening Program Compared With Opportunistic Detection in China

PRCIS

Health examination center-based screening provide a good supplement to clinic-based glaucoma care by detecting early-stage glaucoma, especially those with normal intraocular pressure (IOP) and less visual impairment.

PURPOSE

Opportunistic glaucoma screening for early case identification is of great value in the prevention of severe visual impairment, however, novel, low-cost models are needed. We aimed to determine whether health examination center-based glaucoma screening identifies diseases earlier than outpatient cases in China.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this case-control study, 76 patients with primary glaucoma identified from a health examination center-based glaucoma screening program and 272 consecutive outpatient cases at the same hospital were enrolled from March 21 to September 30, 2016. Demographic characteristics, best-corrected visual acuity, IOP, mean deviation (MD), and pattern standard deviation (PSD) on Humphrey visual field testing in the better-seeing eye were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Screening-detected glaucoma patients had significantly lower IOP (18.3±4.2 mm Hg) than out-patient cases (26.7±12.6 mm Hg, P <0.001). Most (71.1%) of the screening-detected patients had IOP<21 mm Hg compared with 37.1% in the clinic group ( P <0.001). Seventy-five patients (98.7%) in the screening group were diagnosed as primary open angle glaucoma, compared with 44.1% in the clinic group ( P <0.001). Screening-detected patients had significantly less visual impairment than the clinic group (6.6% vs. 38.6%, P <0.05). Mean MD (-4.4±5.0 dB) and PSD (4.4±3.6 dB) for the screening group were superior to the clinic group (MD: -16.5±10.5 dB, P <0.001; PSD: 6.5±3.7 dB, P <0.001).

CONCLUSION

The glaucoma screening program was effective at detecting early disease, especially normal tension glaucoma and supplemented opportunistic detection of glaucoma.

Advanced glaucoma. Clinical practice guideline

OBJECTIVE

To present an update clinical practice guideline that serve as a guide for the detection, evaluation and treatment of adults patients with advanced glaucoma.

METHODS

After defining the objectives and scope of the guide, the working group was formed and structured clinical questions were formulated following the PICO (Patient, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes) format. Once all the existing clinical evidence had been independently evaluated with the AMSTAR 2 (Assessment of Multiple systematic Rewiews) and Cochrane "Risk of bias" tools by at least two reviewers, recommendations were formulated following the Scottish Intercollegiate methodology. Guideline Network (SIGN).

RESULTS

Recommendations with their corresponding levels of evidence that may be useful in the diagnosis, monitoring and treatment of adults patients with advanced glaucoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the fact that for many of the questions the level of scientific evidence available is not very high, this clinical practice guideline offers an updated review of the different existing aspects related to the evaluation and management of advanced glaucoma.

[Glaucoma treatment by transscleral cyclophotocoagulation in micropulse technology in a low-income setting]

BACKGROUND

Glaucoma is the leading cause of irreversible blindness worldwide. The prevalence of glaucoma is particularly high in rural regions of Tanzania. Poverty and an inadequate ophthalmic infrastructure increase the difficulty of glaucoma treatment.

OBJECTIVE

Due to the limited access to eye drops or surgical therapy, the effectiveness of transscleral cyclophotocoagulation in micropulse technology (CPC-M) in advanced glaucoma was investigated in the present study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We included n = 50 eyes of 35 adult patients with advanced glaucoma and a glaucoma-typical papillary excavation with cupdisc ratio (CDR) ≥ 0.9, regardless of the glaucoma entity. The mean intraocular pressure (IOP) prior to treatment was 34 mm Hg (± 14 mm Hg). The operation was performed under retrobulbar anesthesia with the A.R.C. FOX 810 diode laser (A.R.C. Laser, Nuremberg, Germany; mean energy 127 J ± 10 J).

RESULTS

An IOP between 6 and 21 mm Hg or an IOP reduction by at least 20% of the initial value was defined as success. The success criteria were met by 71% of reevaluated eyes (n = 21) 3 months after treatment, and mean IOP was 19 mm Hg (± 13 mm Hg). Mean IOP 9 months postoperatively (n = 20) was 18 mm Hg (± 10 mm Hg) and the success criteria were met in 65% of cases. Seven eyes did not meet the success criteria: six eyes had a further increase in IOP and one eye showed intraocular hypotension.

CONCLUSION

The CPC‑M represents a good, inexpensive, and easily accessible treatment option for advanced glaucoma in order to reduce the likelihood of blindness in a low-income setting.

Pointwise and Region-Wise Course of Visual Field Loss in Patients With Glaucoma

Purpose

Accurate assessment of visual field (VF) trend may help clinicians devise the optimum treatment regimen. This study was conducted to investigate the behavior of VF sequences using pointwise and region-wise linear, exponential, and sigmoid regression models.

Materials and Methods

In a retrospective cohort study, 277 eyes of 139 patients with glaucoma who had been followed for at least 7 years were investigated. Linear, exponential, and sigmoid regression models were fitted for each VF test location and Glaucoma Hemifield Test (GHT) region to model the trend of VF loss. The model with the lowest root mean square error (RMSE) was selected as the best fit.

Results

The mean age (standard deviation [SD]) of the patients was 59.9 years (9.8) with a mean follow-up time of 9.3 (0.7) years. The exponential regression had the best fit based on pointwise and region-wise approaches in 39.3% and 38.1% of eyes, respectively. The results showed a better performance based on sigmoid regression in patients with initial VF sensitivity threshold greater than 22 dB (71.6% in pointwise and 62.2% in region-wise approaches). The overall RMSE of the region-wise regression model was lower than the overall RMSE of the pointwise model.

Conclusions

In the current study, nonlinear regression models showed a better fit compared to the linear regression models in tracking VF loss behavior. Moreover, findings suggest region-wise analysis may provide a more appropriate approach for assessing VF deterioration.

Translational Relevance

Findings may confirm a nonlinear progression of VF deterioration in patients with glaucoma.

Cohort Study of Race/Ethnicity and Incident Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Characterized by Autonomously Determined Visual Field Loss Patterns

Purpose

We evaluated racial/ethnic differences in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) defined by machine-learning–derived regional visual field (VF) loss patterns.

Methods

Participants (N = 209,036) from the Nurses’ Health Study (NHS; 1980–2018), Nurses’ Health Study II (NHS2; 1989–2019), and Health Professionals Follow-Up Study (HPFS; 1986–2018) who were ≥40 years of age and free of glaucoma were followed biennially. Incident POAG cases (n = 1946) with reproducible VF loss were confirmed with medical records. Total deviation information from the earliest reliable glaucomatous VF for each POAG eye (n = 2564) was extracted, and machine learning analyses were used to identify optimal solutions (“archetypes”) for regional VF loss patterns. Each POAG eye was assigned a VF archetype based on the highest weighting coefficient. Multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using per-eye Cox proportional hazards models.

Results

We identified 14 archetypes: four representing advanced loss patterns, nine of early loss, and one of no VF loss. Compared to non-Hispanic whites, black participants had higher risk of early VF loss archetypes (HR = 1.98; 95% CI, 1.48–2.66) and even higher risk for advanced loss archetypes (HR = 6.17; 95% CI, 3.69–10.32; P-contrast = 0.0002); no differences were observed for Asians or Hispanic whites. Hispanic white participants had significantly higher risks of POAG with paracentral defects and advanced superior loss; black participants had significantly higher risks of all advanced loss archetypes and three early loss patterns, including paracentral defects.

Conclusions

Blacks, compared to non-Hispanic whites, had higher risks of POAG with early central and advanced VF loss.

Translational Relevance

In POAG, risks of VF loss regional patterns derived from machine learning algorithms showed racial differences.

Clinical Characteristics and Stage at Presentation of Glaucoma Patients in Sub-Saharan Africa

PURPOSE

To explore regional variations in the presentation of newly diagnosed glaucoma in Sub Saharan Africa (SSA).

METHODOLOGY

This was a multi-centre, cross-sectional study in which newly diagnosed, consecutive, glaucoma patients aged ≥18 years were recruited from 27 eye clinics in 10 countries throughout SSA. Demographic and ophthalmic examination data were collected. Glaucoma severity was based on optic nerve head and visual field assessment. Statistical analyses were performed using STATA version 14.0.

RESULTS

Among 1214 enrolled patients with newly diagnosed glaucoma from Western, Eastern and Southern Africa, the overall mean (standard deviation) age was 59.9 (17.1) years. More than half of all patients (716/1178; 60.8%) presented with severe glaucoma in the worse eye, and one third (36.9%) had severe glaucoma in both eyes. Primary open-angle glaucoma was the commonest form of glaucoma in all regions (77.4%). A family history of blindness (260/1204, 21.6%) was common. Patients from Western Africa had lower mean presenting IOP (26.4 [11.1] mmHg, P <0.001), but had worse glaucoma in the better eye based on mean cup-disc ratio (0.8; P <0.001) and mean visual field mean deviation [10.4 (8.4)] dB, P =0.016) compared to other regions. Exfoliation glaucoma was more common in Eastern Africa (30/170=17.7%, P <0.001) compared to other regions.

CONCLUSION

The initial presentation of glaucoma varies meaningfully across SSA. A comprehensive strategy with regional customization based on local differences is needed to reduce glaucoma blindness in SSA.

Handheld chromatic pupillometry can accurately and rapidly reveal functional loss in glaucoma

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Early detection and treatment of glaucoma can delay vision loss. In this study, we evaluate the performance of handheld chromatic pupillometry (HCP) for the objective and rapid detection of functional loss in glaucoma.

METHODS

In this clinic-based, prospective study, we enrolled 149 patients (median (IQR) years: 68.5 (13.6) years) with confirmed glaucoma and 173 healthy controls (55.2 (26.7) years). Changes in pupil size in response to 9 s of exponentially increasing blue (469 nm) and red (640 nm) light-stimuli were assessed monocularly using a custom-built handheld pupillometer. Pupillometric features were extracted from individual traces and compared between groups. Features with the highest classification potential, selected using a gradient boosting machine technique, were incorporated into a generalised linear model for glaucoma classification. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses (ROC) were used to compare the performance of HCP, optical coherence tomography (OCT) and Humphrey Visual Field (HVF).

RESULTS

Pupillary light responses were altered in glaucoma compared with controls. For glaucoma classification, HCP yielded an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.94 (95% CI 0.91 to 0.96), a sensitivity of 87.9% and specificity of 88.4%. The classification performance of HCP in early-moderate glaucoma (visual field mean deviation (VFMD) > -12 dB; AUC=0.91 (95% CI 0.87 to 0.95)) was similar to HVF (AUC=0.91) and reduced compared with OCT (AUC=0.97; p=0.01). For severe glaucoma (VFMD ≤ -12 dB), HCP had an excellent classification performance (AUC=0.98, 95% CI 0.97 to 1) that was similar to HVF and OCT.

CONCLUSION

HCP allows for an accurate, objective and rapid detection of functional loss in glaucomatous eyes of different severities.

Glaucoma Screening Using an iPad-Based Visual Field Test in a West African Population

PURPOSE

To investigate the performance of the Melbourne Rapid Fields (MRF) for use in clinic-based visual field testing in a low-resource setting.

DESIGN

Prospective cross-sectional study.

PARTICIPANTS

One hundred and three participants (66 patients with glaucoma and 37 control participants) attending a clinical appointment at the Tema Eye Center, Tema, Ghana.

METHODS

Patients with glaucoma and control participants underwent MRF and Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA) testing.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Mean deviation (MD), pattern standard deviation (PSD), reliability parameters, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.

RESULTS

Mean MD was less negative and mean PSD was more positive on the MRF than the HFA in both groups (all P < 0.001). False-positive and false-negative rates were comparable between methods (P = 0.09 and P = 0.35, respectively). In patients with glaucoma, MD and PSD from the 2 devices were correlated strongly (r = 0.84; P < 0.001) and moderately (r = 0.61; P < 0.001), respectively. Agreement analysis revealed that MRF tended to generate significantly higher MD (bias, 3.3 ± 4.1 dB; P = 0.03) and PSD (bias, 1.9 ± 2.8 dB; P = 0.03) with wide limits of agreement. For detecting moderate to advanced glaucoma, the sensitivity was 60.9% for the MRF and 78.3% for the HFA (P = 0.10); respective specificities were 86.5% and 83.8% (P = 0.76).

CONCLUSIONS

The MRF underestimated MD and overestimated PSD values compared with the HFA. Agreement biases were significant, suggesting a weak agreement between the 2 devices. However, the MRF showed potential for screening in a low-resource setting, particularly for detecting moderate to advanced glaucoma.

A Review to Populate A Proposed Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Glaucoma Screening in Sub-Saharan Africa

To populate a proposed cost-effectiveness analysis of glaucoma screening in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA).A complete search was conducted on PubMed, Medline and African Journals Online (AJOL) to obtain relevant published articles, which were included in this review. All relevant articles on prevalence of glaucoma in SSA and among other African-derived populations, severity of glaucoma, cost of diagnosis and management, clinical effectiveness of glaucoma screening and treatment and the different glaucoma screening strategies in SSA were reviewed.Population screening interventions for glaucoma may be considered as follows: standalone screening for glaucoma, screening for glaucoma during cataract outreach, and screening incorporated with diabetic retinopathy image review using tele-ophthalmology. Our review suggests that cost of glaucoma treatment is relatively low with cost of medical treatment ranging from USD 273 to USD 480 per year/patient and surgical treatment cost of USD 283 per patient as with other developing countries. Compliance with medication is moderate to good in about 50% of glaucoma patients. Prevalence of glaucoma is much higher in SSA and almost 50% of glaucoma patients are blind in at least one eye at presentation in clinics (without outreach screening). Our review suggests a moderate sensitivity and specificity in identifying glaucoma with basic equipment (direct ophthalmoscope, contact tonometer and frequency doubling technology) during outreach screening although about a third or fewer take up glaucoma services in clinics.Our review provides the necessary information to conduct a cost-effective analysis of glaucoma screening in SSA using the decision Markov model.

Assessment of Reasons for Presentation in New Primary Glaucoma Patients and Identification of Risk Factors for Late Presentation

PURPOSE

To evaluate the reasons for seeking care among South Indian primary glaucoma patients and to determine the relationship of various patient characteristics to glaucoma severity at presentation.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

PARTICIPANTS

One hundred sixty-one new primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG) patients seeking treatment at a tertiary eye hospital.

METHODS

After confirmation of diagnosis, participants' clinical information and their reported reasons for presentation were assessed. Data collected include age, gender, education, occupation, rural or urban residence, distance traveled to the hospital, method of transportation, need for an accompanying person, place of screening before referral or whether they came by themselves for testing. Advanced glaucoma was defined by a cup-to-disc ratio of 0.85 or higher in either eye.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcomes were the various reasons for presentation. The secondary outcome was to determine whether a relationship existed between the patient characteristics mentioned above and presentation with advanced glaucoma.

RESULTS

The mean age of the participants was 60.8 years. The primary reason for presentation was defective vision (55.2%) followed by routine ophthalmic evaluation (13%). Sixty-four patients (39.8%) showed advanced glaucoma in at least 1 eye at presentation. Unilateral blindness was noted in 18 patients (11.2%). The mean vertical cup-to-disc ratio was 0.66 (standard deviation [SD], ±0.16) in the better-seeing eye and 0.76 (SD, ±0.12) in the worse-seeing eye. The mean presenting intraocular pressure was 22.9 mmHg in POAG and 25.5 mmHg in PACG patients. Multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that people who are currently unemployed (P < 0.001; odds ratio [OR], 4.19; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.95-8.99) and rural residence (P = 0.04; OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.21-0.99) had greater odds of demonstrating advanced glaucoma at presentation. Presentation with defective vision, older age, and education less than college graduation were associated with greater odds of showing advanced glaucoma in univariate analysis, but not in multivariate analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

In a South Indian population, absence of work and rural residence was associated with advanced glaucoma at presentation. The population in whom these risk factors are common should be targeted for screening and outreach.