1
|
Haug IM, Neumer SP, Handegård BH, Lisøy C, Rasmussen LMP, Bania EV, Adolfsen F, Patras J. Dose-Response Effects of MittEcho, a Measurement Feedback System, in an Indicated Mental Health Intervention for Children in Municipal and School Services in Norway. ADMINISTRATION AND POLICY IN MENTAL HEALTH AND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH 2024:10.1007/s10488-024-01389-9. [PMID: 38809322 DOI: 10.1007/s10488-024-01389-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/11/2024] [Indexed: 05/30/2024]
Abstract
Including routine client feedback can increase the effectiveness of mental health interventions for children, especially when implemented as intended. Rate of implementation, or dose, of such feedback interventions has been shown to moderate results in some studies. Variation in implementation and use of client feedback may also contribute to the mixed results observed within the feedback literature. This study evaluates dose-response associations of client feedback using a novel Measurement Feedback System (MFS) within an indicated group intervention. The primary aim was to determine whether the rate of MFS implementation predicts symptom reduction in anxiety and depression among school-aged children. The secondary aim was to assess whether the rate of MFS implementation influences children's satisfaction with the group intervention or their dropout rates. Data were collected via a randomized factorial study (clinicaltrials.gov NCT04263558) across 58 primary schools in Norway. Children aged 8 to 12 years (N = 701) participated in a group-based, transdiagnostic intervention targeting elevated symptoms of anxiety or depression. Half of the child groups also received the feedback intervention using the MittEcho MFS. Group leaders (N = 83), recruited locally, facilitated the interventions. The MFS dose was measured using the Implementation Index, which combines the use of MFS by both children and providers (group leaders) into a single dose variable. Results showed no significant additional effect of dose of MFS on change in depression or anxiety scores, on user satisfaction with the intervention or on intervention dropout. The discussion addresses potential reasons for these non-significant findings and implications for MFS implementation in preventive, group-based interventions in school settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ida Mari Haug
- Regional Centre for Child and Adolescent Mental Health and Child Welfare, Northern Norway, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Sykehusvegen 44, Tromsø, 9019, Norway.
| | - Simon-Peter Neumer
- Regional Centre for Child and Adolescent Mental Health and Child Welfare, Northern Norway, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Sykehusvegen 44, Tromsø, 9019, Norway
- Regional Centre for Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Eastern and Southern Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Bjørn Helge Handegård
- Regional Centre for Child and Adolescent Mental Health and Child Welfare, Northern Norway, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Sykehusvegen 44, Tromsø, 9019, Norway
| | - Carina Lisøy
- Regional Centre for Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Eastern and Southern Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Lene-Mari P Rasmussen
- Regional Centre for Child and Adolescent Mental Health and Child Welfare, Northern Norway, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Sykehusvegen 44, Tromsø, 9019, Norway
| | - Elisabeth Valmyr Bania
- Regional Centre for Child and Youth Mental Health and Child Welfare, Department of Mental Health, Central Norway, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Frode Adolfsen
- Regional Centre for Child and Adolescent Mental Health and Child Welfare, Northern Norway, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Sykehusvegen 44, Tromsø, 9019, Norway
| | - Joshua Patras
- Regional Centre for Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Eastern and Southern Norway, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Connors EH, Childs AW, Douglas S, Jensen-Doss A. Data-Informed Communication: How Measurement-Based Care Can Optimize Child Psychotherapy. ADMINISTRATION AND POLICY IN MENTAL HEALTH AND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH 2024:10.1007/s10488-024-01372-4. [PMID: 38662178 DOI: 10.1007/s10488-024-01372-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/13/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024]
Abstract
Measurement-based care (MBC) research and practice, including clinical workflows and systems to support MBC, are grounded in adult-serving mental health systems. MBC research evidence is building in child and adolescent services, but MBC practice is inherently more complex due to identified client age, the family system and the need to involve multiple reporters. This paper seeks to address a gap in the literature by providing practical guidance for youth-serving clinicians implementing MBC with children and their families. We focus on MBC as a data-informed, client-centered communication process, and present three key strategies to enhance usual care child and adolescent psychotherapy via developmentally-appropriate MBC. These strategies include (1) go beyond standardized measures; (2) lean into discrepancies; and (3) get curious together. Case-based examples drawn from various child-serving settings illustrate these key strategies of MBC in child psychotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Amber W Childs
- Yale School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Susan Douglas
- Department of Leadership, Policy, and Organizations, Vanderbilt University, Peabody College, Nashville, TN, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rognstad K, Engell T, Fjermestad K, Wentzel-Larsen T, Kjøbli J. Process and Implementation Elements of Measurement Feedback Systems: A Systematic Review. ADMINISTRATION AND POLICY IN MENTAL HEALTH AND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH 2023:10.1007/s10488-023-01325-3. [PMID: 38153585 DOI: 10.1007/s10488-023-01325-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/18/2023] [Indexed: 12/29/2023]
Abstract
Measurement feedback systems (MFS) can help guide treatment and improve clinical outcomes. Studies of MFS are heterogeneous both in execution and results, and the effects of MFS seem restricted by limited attention to process and implementation elements and by limited adoption by health professionals. The current systematic review mapped the use of process and implementation elements in MFS studies. An overview of therapists' use of and attitudes toward MFS is provided. Three-level meta-analyses were used to test theoretically informed process and implementation elements as moderators of the effects of MFS. Hypotheses and general propositions from Clinical Performance Feedback Intervention Theory (CP-FIT) were used to organize the elements of the studies and were used as moderator variables. Previous studies on MFS interventions have had a limited focus on implementation efforts and process elements that may increase the effects of MFS and their use among therapists. Efforts have sparsely been made to reduce barriers to MFS use, and several studies have reported limited engagement with MFS among therapists. Therapists' attitudes toward MFS, feedback, or standardized measures were heterogeneously reported, making data synthesis challenging. Identified process and implementation elements were not significantly associated with effect sizes in the studies and the results did not support the propositions of CP-FIT. The lack of statistically significant associations may be due to limited reporting of details about process and implementation aspects. More research designed to test hypotheses regarding process and implementation elements is needed to improve the use and effects of MFS. Future studies should aspire to report findings in a manner that allows for an understanding of the implementation process and therapists' adoption of these systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristian Rognstad
- Regional Center for Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Eastern and Southern Norway, Oslo, Norway.
- Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Thomas Engell
- Regional Center for Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Eastern and Southern Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Tore Wentzel-Larsen
- Regional Center for Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Eastern and Southern Norway, Oslo, Norway
- Norwegian Centre for Violence and Traumatic Stress Studies, Oslo, Norway
| | - John Kjøbli
- Regional Center for Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Eastern and Southern Norway, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Education, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rognstad K, Wentzel-Larsen T, Neumer SP, Kjøbli J. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Measurement Feedback Systems in Treatment for Common Mental Health Disorders. ADMINISTRATION AND POLICY IN MENTAL HEALTH AND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH 2023; 50:269-282. [PMID: 36434313 PMCID: PMC9931854 DOI: 10.1007/s10488-022-01236-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
To investigate the effects of measurement feedback systems (MFSs) in therapy on mental health outcomes through a literature review and meta-analysis. Using a three-level modeling approach, we conducted a meta-analysis of all effect sizes from randomized controlled studies of MFSs used in the treatment of common mental health disorders. Eighty-two effect sizes were extracted from the thirty-one included studies. Analyses were performed to consider the post-treatment effects of the MFS-assisted treatment compared to treatment as usual. A separate analysis was done for the subgroup "not-on-track" patients as it is theorized that MFSs will be clinically useful because they make therapists aware of patients who fail to progress. MFSs had a significant effect on mental health outcomes (d = 0.14, 95% CI [0.082-0.206], p < .001). Further analysis found a larger effect in patients identified as less respondent to therapy, the "not-on-track" group (d = 0.29, 95% CI [0.114, 0.464], p = .003). Moderation analyses indicated that the type of outcome measurement and type of feedback system used, and whether it was used for a child and youth or adult population, influenced effect sizes. MFSs seem to have a small positive effect on treatment outcomes. The effects seem to be larger for "not-on-track" patients, the group of patients that would usually not benefit much from treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristian Rognstad
- Regional Center for Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Eastern and Southern Norway, Oslo, Norway.
- Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Tore Wentzel-Larsen
- Regional Center for Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Eastern and Southern Norway, Oslo, Norway
- Norwegian Centre for Violence and Traumatic Stress Studies, Oslo, Norway
| | - Simon-Peter Neumer
- Regional Center for Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Eastern and Southern Norway, Oslo, Norway
- Regional Centre for Child and Youth Mental Health and Child Welfare, UIT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - John Kjøbli
- Regional Center for Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Eastern and Southern Norway, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Education, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bongers IL, Buitenweg DC, van Kuijk REFM, van Nieuwenhuizen C. I Need to Know: Using the CeHRes Roadmap to Develop a Treatment Feedback Tool for Youngsters with Mental Health Problems. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:10834. [PMID: 36078564 PMCID: PMC9518175 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191710834] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2022] [Revised: 08/05/2022] [Accepted: 08/10/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) are often used to monitor treatment outcomes in youth mental health care. Unfortunately, youngsters are rarely informed about the results of their PROMs or, when they are, it is in an insufficient manner. Therefore, a web application was developed-together with youngsters-aimed at giving them feedback about their PROMs. The aim of this study is to describe the development process of the application. An expert panel consisting of youngsters, web designers and researchers, as well as a representative from a client organisation, developed the e-health application INK (short for 'I Need to Know') in an iterative process based on the Centre for eHealth Research roadmap (CeHRes roadmap). Youngsters prefer, among other aspects, a simple, easy-to-use e-health application with a colourful appearance and want to be able to compare their results across different time points and informants. The INK tool provides youngsters with insight into their PROM results. Based on the youngsters' preferences, INK users can choose which feedback information is visible. INK facilitates youngsters' active participation in their treatment as well as shared decision-making with their professional caregivers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilja L. Bongers
- Institute for Mental Health Care Eindhoven (GGzE), Centre for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, P.O. Box 909, 5626 ND Eindhoven, The Netherlands
- Scientific Center for Care & Wellbeing (Tranzo), Tilburg University, P.O. Box 90153, 5000 LE Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - David C. Buitenweg
- Institute for Mental Health Care Eindhoven (GGzE), Centre for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, P.O. Box 909, 5626 ND Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Romy E. F. M. van Kuijk
- Scientific Center for Care & Wellbeing (Tranzo), Tilburg University, P.O. Box 90153, 5000 LE Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Chijs van Nieuwenhuizen
- Institute for Mental Health Care Eindhoven (GGzE), Centre for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, P.O. Box 909, 5626 ND Eindhoven, The Netherlands
- Scientific Center for Care & Wellbeing (Tranzo), Tilburg University, P.O. Box 90153, 5000 LE Tilburg, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lyon AR, Liu FF, Connors EH, King KM, Coifman JI, Cook H, McRee E, Ludwig K, Law A, Dorsey S, McCauley E. How low can you go? Examining the effects of brief online training and post-training consultation dose on implementation mechanisms and outcomes for measurement-based care. Implement Sci Commun 2022; 3:79. [PMID: 35869500 PMCID: PMC9306246 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-022-00325-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2021] [Accepted: 07/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Initial training and ongoing post-training consultation (i.e., ongoing support following training, provided by an expert) are among the most common implementation strategies used to change clinician practice. However, extant research has not experimentally investigated the optimal dosages of consultation necessary to produce desired outcomes. Moreover, the degree to which training and consultation engage theoretical implementation mechanisms-such as provider knowledge, skills, and attitudes-is not well understood. This study examined the effects of a brief online training and varying dosages of post-training consultation (BOLT+PTC) on implementation mechanisms and outcomes for measurement-based care (MBC) practices delivered in the context of education sector mental health services. METHODS A national sample of 75 clinicians who provide mental health interventions to children and adolescents in schools were randomly assigned to BOLT+PTC or control (services as usual). Those in BOLT+PTC were further randomized to 2-, 4-, or 8-week consultation conditions. Self-reported MBC knowledge, skills, attitudes, and use (including standardized assessment, individualized assessment, and assessment-informed treatment modification) were collected for 32 weeks. Multilevel models were used to examine main effects of BOLT+PTC versus control on MBC use at the end of consultation and over time, as well as comparisons among PTC dosage conditions and theorized mechanisms (skills, attitudes, knowledge). RESULTS There was a significant linear effect of BOLT+PTC over time on standardized assessment use (b = .02, p < .01), and a significant quadratic effect of BOLT+PTC over time on individualized assessment use (b = .04, p < .001), but no significant effect on treatment modification. BOLT + any level of PTC resulted in higher MBC knowledge and larger growth in MBC skill over the intervention period as compared to control. PTC dosage levels were inconsistently predictive of outcomes, providing no clear evidence for added benefit of higher PTC dosage. CONCLUSIONS Online training and consultation in MBC had effects on standardized and individualized assessment use among clinicians as compared to services as usual with no consistent benefit detected for increased consultation dosage. Continued research investigating optimal dosages and mechanisms of these established implementation strategies is needed to ensure training and consultation resources are deployed efficiently to impact clinician practices. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05041517 . Retrospectively registered on 10 September 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron R. Lyon
- grid.34477.330000000122986657Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, 6200 NE 74th Street, Suite 100, Seattle, WA 98115 USA
| | - Freda F. Liu
- grid.34477.330000000122986657Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, 6200 NE 74th Street, Suite 100, Seattle, WA 98115 USA
| | - Elizabeth H. Connors
- grid.47100.320000000419368710Department of Psychiatry, Yale University, 389 Whitney Avenue, Office 106, New Haven, CT 06511 USA
| | - Kevin M. King
- grid.34477.330000000122986657Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Guthrie Hall, Box 351525, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
| | - Jessica I. Coifman
- grid.34477.330000000122986657Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, 6200 NE 74th Street, Suite 100, Seattle, WA 98115 USA
| | - Heather Cook
- grid.34477.330000000122986657Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, 6200 NE 74th Street, Suite 100, Seattle, WA 98115 USA
| | - Erin McRee
- grid.34477.330000000122986657Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, 6200 NE 74th Street, Suite 100, Seattle, WA 98115 USA
| | - Kristy Ludwig
- grid.34477.330000000122986657Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, 6200 NE 74th Street, Suite 100, Seattle, WA 98115 USA
| | - Amy Law
- grid.34477.330000000122986657Graduate Medical Education, University of Washington, Learning Gateway, Box 358220, Seattle, WA 98109 USA
| | - Shannon Dorsey
- grid.34477.330000000122986657Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Guthrie Hall, Box 351525, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
| | - Elizabeth McCauley
- grid.34477.330000000122986657Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, 6200 NE 74th Street, Suite 100, Seattle, WA 98115 USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Parikh A, Fristad MA, Axelson D, Krishna R. Evidence Base for Measurement-Based Care in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am 2020; 29:587-599. [PMID: 32891364 DOI: 10.1016/j.chc.2020.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Measurement-based care (MBC) is the routine collection of data using standardized, validated measures and use of these data to guide treatment. MBC has been implemented throughout medicine to improve patient outcomes, but its use in mental health care remains low. This article summarizes the evidence of MBC's efficacy in adults then reviews the sparser data in youth mental health care. The literature indicates that MBC must be administered immediately before or during every encounter, results must be available to and reviewed by providers immediately, results must be shared with the patient, and results must be used to guide treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amit Parikh
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA; Big Lots Behavioral Health Service Line, Nationwide Children's Hospital, 444 Butterfly Gardens Drive, Columbus, OH 43215, USA
| | - Mary A Fristad
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA; Big Lots Behavioral Health Service Line, Nationwide Children's Hospital, 444 Butterfly Gardens Drive, Columbus, OH 43215, USA
| | - David Axelson
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA; Big Lots Behavioral Health Service Line, Nationwide Children's Hospital, 444 Butterfly Gardens Drive, Columbus, OH 43215, USA
| | - Rajeev Krishna
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA; Big Lots Behavioral Health Service Line, Nationwide Children's Hospital, 444 Butterfly Gardens Drive, Columbus, OH 43215, USA.
| |
Collapse
|