Lack of association between gene sequence variations of platelet membrane receptors and aspirin responsiveness detected by the PFA-100 system in patients with coronary artery disease

Association among PlA1/A2 gene polymorphism, laboratory aspirin resistance and clinical outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease: An updated meta-analysis

The aim of this study was to investigate the association among the PlA1/A2 gene polymorphism, laboratory aspirin resistance and adverse clinical outcomes in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients who were on aspirin maintainance therapy. A comprehensive literature search was performed and 35 eligible clinical trials including 19025 CAD patients were recruited. Adverse clinical outcomes involving all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), ischemic stroke and target vessel revascularization (TVR) were analyzed. The definition of aspirin resistance in each study was accepted. Meta-analysis was performed using the Review Manager 5.3.5 System. In CAD patients, the PlA2 gene carriers had similar incidence of laboratory aspirin resistance compared to those with PlA1/A1 genotype [29.7% vs 28.3%, OR = 0.94 (95% CI 0.63 to 1.40, P = 0.74)], and there were no significant differences in the adverse clinical outcomes between the PlA2 carriers and the PlA1/A1 genotype patients. However, the laboratory aspirin non-responders had higher risks of death [7.9% vs. 2.5%, OR = 2.42 (95% CI 1.86 to 3.15, P < 0.00001)] and TVR [4.5% vs. 1.7%, OR = 2.20 (95% CI 1.19 to 4.08, P = 0.01)] compared to the responders. In aspirin-treated CAD patients, the laboratory aspirin resistance predicts all-cause death and TVR. However, the PlA1/A2 gene polymorphism predicts neither the laboratory aspirin response nor the clinical outcomes.

The pharmacogenetic control of antiplatelet response: candidate genes and CYP2C19

INTRODUCTION

Aspirin, clopidogrel, prasugrel and ticagrelor are antiplatelet agents for the prevention of ischemic events in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and other indications. Variability in response is observed to different degrees with these agents, which can translate to increased risks for adverse cardiovascular events. As such, potential pharmacogenetic determinants of antiplatelet pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and clinical outcomes have been actively studied.

AREAS COVERED

This article provides an overview of the available antiplatelet pharmacogenetics literature. Evidence supporting the significance of candidate genes and their potential influence on antiplatelet response and clinical outcomes are summarized and evaluated. Additional focus is directed at CYP2C19 and clopidogrel response, including the availability of clinical testing and genotype-directed antiplatelet therapy.

EXPERT OPINION

The reported aspirin response candidate genes have not been adequately replicated and few candidate genes have thus far been implicated in prasugrel or ticagrelor response. However, abundant data support the clinical validity of CYP2C19 and clopidogrel response variability among ACS/PCI patients. Although limited prospective trial data are available to support the utility of routine CYP2C19 testing, the increased risks for reduced clopidogrel efficacy among ACS/PCI patients that carry CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles should be considered when genotype results are available.

Increased platelet expression of glycoprotein IIIa following aspirin treatment in aspirin-resistant but not aspirin-sensitive subjects

AIMS

Aspirin is widely used as an anti-platelet agent for cardiovascular prophylaxis. Despite aspirin treatment, many patients experience recurrent thrombotic events, and aspirin resistance may contribute to this. We examined the prevalence of aspirin resistance in a healthy population, and investigated whether the platelet proteome differed in aspirin-resistant subjects.

METHODS

Ninety-three healthy subjects received aspirin 300 mg daily for 28 days. Before and at the end of treatment, urine was taken to determine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 , and blood was taken to measure arachidonic acid (AA)-induced aggregation of platelet-rich plasma and to interrogate the platelet proteome by mass spectrometric analysis with further confirmation of findings using Western blotting.

RESULTS

In two of the 93 subjects, neither AA-induced aggregation nor urinary 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 was effectively suppressed by aspirin, despite measurable plasma salicylate concentrations, suggesting the presence of true aspirin resistance. Despite no detectable differences in the platelet proteome at baseline, following aspirin a marked increase was seen in platelet glycoprotein IIIa expression in the aspirin-resistant but not aspirin-sensitive subjects. An increase in platelet glycoprotein IIIa expression with aspirin resistance was confirmed in a separate cohort of 17 patients with stable coronary artery disease on long term aspirin treatment, four of whom exhibited aspirin resistance.

CONCLUSIONS

In a healthy population, true aspirin resistance is uncommon but exists. Resistance is associated with an increase in platelet glycoprotein IIIa expression in response to aspirin. These data shed new light on the mechanism of aspirin resistance, and provide the potential to identify aspirin-resistant subjects using a novel biomarker.

The PlA1/A2 polymorphism of glycoprotein IIIa in relation to efficacy of antiplatelet drugs: a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

The PlA1/A2 polymorphism of glycoprotein IIIa (GPIIIa) has been associated with both antiplatelet drug resistance and increased cardiovascular events. The aim of this study was to conduct the first meta-analysis investigating the association between carriage of the PlA2 allele and resistance to currently licensed antiplatelet drugs.

METHODS

Electronic databases (MEDLINE and EMBASE) were searched for all articles evaluating genetic polymorphisms of GPIIIa. For studies where antiplatelet resistance was measured using validated techniques, pooled odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using fixed effects and random effects models.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies were eligible for statistical analysis and included 1650 PlA1 homozygous subjects and 668 carriers of the PlA2 allele. For carriers of the PlA2 allele, OR 0.924 (n = 2318; 95% CI 0.743, 1.151; P = 0.481) was observed for resistance to any antiplatelet drug, OR 0.862 (n = 2085; 95% CI 0.685, 1.086; P = 0.208) for resistance to aspirin and OR 1.429 (n = 233; 95% CI 0.791, 2.582; P = 0.237) for resistance to clopidogrel. In the aspirin cohort, sub-group analysis revealed no statistical association in either healthy subjects or those with cardiovascular disease. PlA2 carriage was marginally associated with aspirin sensitivity using the fixed effects model when identified by the PFA-100 assay (n = 1151; OR 0.743, 95% CI 0.558, 0.989; P = 0.041) but with significant heterogeneity (I(2) = 55%; P = 0.002). Significance was lost with analysis using a random effects model.

CONCLUSIONS

The totality of published data does not support an association between carriage of the PlA2 allele and antiplatelet drug resistance. Significant heterogeneity indicates the need for larger studies using validated and standardized assays.

The association of four common polymorphisms from four candidate genes (COX-1, COX-2, ITGA2B, ITGA2) with aspirin insensitivity: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Evidence is mounting suggesting that a strong genetic component underlies aspirin insensitivity. To generate more information, we aimed to evaluate the association of four common polymorphisms (rs3842787, rs20417, rs201184269, rs1126643) from four candidate genes (COX-1, COX-2, ITGA2B, ITGA2) with aspirin insensitivity via a meta-analysis.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In total, there were 4 (353/595), 6 (344/698), 10 (588/878) and 7 (209/676) articles (patients/controls) qualified for rs3842787, rs20417, rs20118426 and rs1126643, respectively. The data were extracted in duplicate and analyzed by STATA software (Version 11.2). The risk estimate was expressed as odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Analyses of the full data set indicated significant associations of rs20417 (OR; 95% CI; P: 1.86; 1.44-2.41; <0.0005) and rs1126643 (2.37; 1.44-3.89; 0.001) with aspirin insensitivity under allelic model. In subgroup analyses, the risk estimate for rs1126643 was greatly potentiated among patients with aspirin semi-resistance relative to those with aspirin resistance, especially under dominant model (aspirin semi-resistance: 5.44; 1.42-20.83; 0.013 versus aspirin resistance: 1.96; 1.07-3.6; 0.03). Further grouping articles by ethnicity observed a stronger prediction of all, but rs20417, examined polymorphisms for aspirin insensitivity in Chinese than in Caucasians. Finally, meta-regression analyses observed that the differences in percentage of coronary artery disease (P = 0.034) and averaged platelet numbers (P = 0.012) between two groups explained a large part of heterogeneity for rs20417 and rs1126643, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our findings provide strong evidence that COX-2 and ITGA2 genetic defects might increase the risk of having aspirin insensitivity, especially for aspirin semi-resistance and in Chinese populations.

Historical lessons in translational medicine: cyclooxygenase inhibition and P2Y12 antagonism

The development of drugs that inhibit platelets has been driven by a combination of clinical insights, fundamental science, and sheer luck. The process has evolved as the days of stumbling on therapeutic gems, such as aspirin, have long passed and have been replaced by an arduous process in which a drug is designed to target a specific protein implicated in a well-characterized pathophysiological process, or so we would like to believe. The development of antiplatelet therapy illustrates the importance of understanding the mechanisms of disease and the pharmacology of the compounds we develop, coupled with careful clinical experimentation and observation and, yes, still, a fair bit of luck.

ASPIRIN RESISTANCE CANDIDATE GENES AND THEIR ASSOCIATION WITH THE RISK OF CARDIOVASCULAR EVENTS

The review presents the current literature evidence on the most likely genetic polymorphisms of aspirin resistance, such as polymorphisms of cyclooxygenase, glycoproteins GP Ib/IIIa, GP Ibα, GP VI, and adenosine diphosphate receptors P2Y1 and P2Y12. The authors discuss the prevalence of these polymorphisms in laboratory and clinical aspirin resistance, as well as their association with the risk of cardiovascular events during aspirin treatment. 

Platelet pharmacogenomics

Platelet responsiveness to conventional antiplatelet therapy underlies a high interindividual variability influenced by various factors. For instance, antiplatelet therapy does not curtail the expected effects in a relevant number of patients as demonstrated by the occurrence of repeated cardiovascular events including stent thrombosis and/or by inadequate platelet inhibition measured by in vitro platelet function assays. Besides non-genetic factors such as age, gender, liver and renal function and co-medication, considerable variation of antiplatelet drug responsiveness can be attributed to genetic factors including polymorphisms and genetic variants of platelet surface proteins and drug metabolizing enzymes. Nowadays, platelet pharmacogenomics has started a new field with the goal to link genetic information of various drug targets to interindividual variability of drug response. Evolving data from large cohort studies suggest a promising role for pharmacogenomics in the context of antiplatelet therapy. Additionally, with the revolution of low cost and high-throughput genotyping techniques, genetic testing has become affordable for clinical application and individualization of therapy. However, a key issue to define the future role of pharmacogenomics will rely on the benefit and the timeliness of implementing the genetic information into therapeutic decision. Hence, it warrants further investigations to document the prognostic effects of therapeutic alterations in distinct genotypes. Concerning the safety profile of emerging antiplatelet and antithrombotic drugs in certain risk groups it would be fatal to individualize treatment barely on behalf of an atherothrombotic genotype. In contrast, individual risk assessment combining non-genetic information and pharmacogenetic analysis represents a reasonable concept. Here, we provide a review on current data describing the role of pharmacogenomics in the field of antiplatelet drug treatment in cardiovascular patients with future directions.

Pharmacogenetics in cardiovascular antithrombotic therapy

Thrombosis is the most important underlying mechanism of coronary artery disease and embolic stroke. Hence, antithrombotic therapy is widely used in these scenarios. However, not all patients achieve the same degree of benefit from antithrombotic agents, and a considerable number of treated patients will continue to experience a new thrombotic event. Such lack of clinical benefit may be related to a wide variability of responses to antithrombotic treatment among individuals (i.e., interindividual heterogeneity). Several factors have been identified in this interindividual heterogeneity in response to antithrombotic treatment. Pharmacogenetics has emerged as a field that identifies specific gene variants able to explain the variability in patient response to a given drug. Polymorphisms affecting the disposition, metabolism, transporters, or targets of a drug all can be implicated in the modification of an individual's antithrombotic drug response and therefore the safety and efficacy of the aforementioned drug. The present paper reviews the modulating role of different polymorphisms on individuals' responses to antithrombotic drugs commonly used in clinical practice.

The new platelet alloantigen Cab a: a single point mutation Gln 716 His on the alpha 2 integrin

BACKGROUND

Fetal/neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia (FNAIT) is caused by maternal alloimmunization against fetal platelet (PLT) antigens, inherited from the father and absent from maternal PLTs.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A 29-year-old mother gave birth to a severely thrombocytopenic newborn (16 x 10(9) PLTs/L) leading to PLT transfusion therapy associated with intravenous immunoglobulins. The outcome was uneventful. Maternal serum showed a specific positive reaction with the antigen-capture assay (monoclonal antibody [MoAb]-specific immobilization of PLT antigens) only when it was tested with the paternal PLTs and a panel of MoAbs against glycoprotein (GP)Ia-IIa (alpha(2)beta(1) integrin) suggesting the implication of a new PLT antigen.

RESULTS

Nucleotide sequence analysis of GPIa cDNA of the father and newborn showed a nucleotide substitution at position 2235 (2235G > T according to the international nomenclature). This substitution induces a Q716H amino acid change in the GPIa mature protein, located outside the I domain involved in cell adhesion for collagen. In vitro analysis of recombinant Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells expressing wild-type or mutant (Q716H) human GPIa allowed us to demonstrate that this single amino acid substitution is responsible and sufficient for inducing Cab(a) antigen expression. Adhesion of CHO cells to collagen was not modified by the Cab polymorphism, nor by the maternal anti-Cab(a) alloantibodies, indicating that the mutation does not affect the function of integrin alpha(2)beta(1). In a Caucasian population study, none of the 104 unrelated blood donors was found to be Cab(a)(+).

CONCLUSION

We describe here a new PLT alloantigen Cab(a) involved in a severe case of FNAIT. Laboratory investigation for the "common" PLT alloantigens is no longer sufficient to evaluate neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia in suspected cases.

Pharmacogenomics of platelet responsiveness to aspirin

Aspirin is the most widely used drug in the world for cardiovascular protection. Aspirin's ability to suppress platelet function varies widely among individuals and lesser suppression of platelet function is associated with increased risk of myocardial infarction, stroke and cardiovascular death. Platelet response to aspirin is a complex phenotype involving multiple genes and molecular pathways. Aspirin response phenotypes can be categorized as directly or indirectly related to cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1) activity, with phenotypic variation indirectly related to COX-1 being much more prominent. Recent data indicate that variability in platelet response to aspirin is genetically determined, but the specific gene variants that contribute to phenotypic variation are not known. An understanding of the relationship between genotype, aspirin response phenotype and clinical outcome will help to bring about a personalized approach to antiplatelet therapy that maximizes antithrombotic benefit whilst minimizing bleeding risk for individual patients.

Pharmacogenetics of aspirin resistance: a comprehensive systematic review

AIMS

The aim was to perform a systematic review of all candidate gene association studies in aspirin resistance.

METHODS

Electronic databases were searched up until 1 December 2007 for all studies investigating any candidate gene for aspirin resistance in humans. Aspirin resistance was required to have been measured by a standardized laboratory technique to be included in the analysis.

RESULTS

Within 31 studies, 50 polymorphisms in 11 genes were investigated in 2834 subjects. The PlA1/A2 polymorphism in the GPIIIa platelet receptor was the most frequently investigated, with 19 studies in 1389 subjects. The PlA1/A2 variant was significantly associated with aspirin resistance when measured in healthy subjects [odds ratio (OR) 2.36, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.24, 4.49; P = 0.009]. Combining genetic data from all studies (comprising both healthy subjects and those with cardiovascular disease) reduced the observed effect size (OR 1.14, 95% CI 0.84, 1.54; P = 0.40). Moreover, the observed effect of PlA1/A2 genotype varied depending on the methodology used for determining aspirin sensitivity/resistance. No significant association was found with aspirin resistance in four other investigated polymorphisms in the COX-1, GPla, P2Y1 or P2Y12 genes.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data support a genetic association between the PlA1/A2 molecular variant and aspirin resistance in healthy subjects, with the effect diminishing in the presence of cardiovascular disease. The laboratory methodology used influences the detection of aspirin resistance. However, as heterogeneity was significant and our results are based on a limited number of studies, further studies are required to confirm our findings.