Arrestin-3 differentially regulates platelet GPCR subsets

Defect of TIMP4 Is Associated with High Myopia and Participates in Rat Ocular Development in a Dose-Dependent Manner

Thinning of the sclera happens in myopia eyes owing to extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling, but the initiators of the ECM remodeling in myopia are mainly unknown. The matrix metalloproteinase (MMPs) and tissue inhibitors of matrix metalloproteinase (TIMPs) regulate the homeostasis of the ECM. However, genetic studies of the MMPs and TIMPs in the occurrence of myopia are poor and limited. This study systematically investigated the association between twenty-nine genes of the TIMPs and MMPs families and early-onset high myopia (eoHM) based on whole exome sequencing data. Two TIMP4 heterozygous loss-of-function (LoF) variants, c.528C>A in six patients and c.234_235insAA in one patient, were statistically enriched in 928 eoHM probands compared to that in 5469 non-high myopia control (p = 3.7 × 10-5) and that in the general population (p = 2.78 × 10-9). Consequently, the Timp4 gene editing rat was further evaluated to explore the possible role of Timp4 on ocular and myopia development. A series of ocular morphology abnormalities in a dose-dependent manner (Timp4-/- < Timp4+/- < Timp4+/+) were observed in a rat model, including the decline in the retinal thickness, the elongation in the axial length, more vulnerable to the form deprivation model, morphology changes in sclera collagen bundles, and the decrease in collagen contents of the sclera and retina. Electroretinogram revealed that the b-wave amplitudes of Timp4 defect rats were significantly reduced, consistent with the shorter length of the bipolar axons detected by HE and IF staining. Heterozygous LoF variants in the TIMP4 are associated with early onset high myopia, and the Timp4 defect disturbs ocular development by influencing the morphology and function of the ocular tissue.

Platelet P2Y1 receptor exhibits constitutive G protein signaling and β-arrestin 2 recruitment

BACKGROUND

Purinergic P2Y₁ and P2Y₁₂ receptors (P2Y₁-R and P2Y₁₂-R) are G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) activated by adenosine diphosphate (ADP) to mediate platelet activation, thereby playing a pivotal role in hemostasis and thrombosis. While P2Y₁₂-R is the major target of antiplatelet drugs, no P2Y₁-R antagonist has yet been developed for clinical use. However, accumulating data suggest that P2Y₁-R inhibition would ensure efficient platelet inhibition with minimal effects on bleeding. In this context, an accurate characterization of P2Y₁-R antagonists constitutes an important preliminary step.

RESULTS

Here, we investigated the pharmacology of P2Y₁-R signaling through Gq and β-arrestin pathways in HEK293T cells and in mouse and human platelets using highly sensitive resonance energy transfer-based technologies (BRET/HTRF). We demonstrated that at basal state, in the absence of agonist ligand, P2Y₁-R activates Gq protein signaling in HEK293T cells and in mouse and human platelets, indicating that P2Y₁-R is constitutively active in physiological conditions. We showed that P2Y₁-R also promotes constitutive recruitment of β-arrestin 2 in HEK293T cells. Moreover, the P2Y₁-R antagonists MRS2179, MRS2279 and MRS2500 abolished the receptor dependent-constitutive activation, thus behaving as inverse agonists.

CONCLUSIONS

This study sheds new light on P2Y₁-R pharmacology, highlighting for the first time the existence of a constitutively active P2Y₁-R population in human platelets. Given the recent interest of P2Y₁₂-R constitutive activity in patients with diabetes, this study suggests that modification of constitutive P2Y₁-R signaling might be involved in pathological conditions, including bleeding syndrome or high susceptibility to thrombotic risk. Thus, targeting platelet P2Y₁-R constitutive activation might be a promising and powerful strategy for future antiplatelet therapy.

GRK2 regulates ADP signaling in platelets via P2Y1 and P2Y12

The critical role of GRK2 in regulating cardiac function has been well documented for over three decades. Therefore, targeting GRK2 has been extensively studied as a novel approach to treat cardiovascular disease. However, little is known about its role in hemostasis and thrombosis. Here we provide the first evidence that GRK2 limits platelet activation and regulates the hemostatic response to injury. Deletion of GRK2 in mouse platelets causes increased platelet accumulation following laser-induced injury in cremaster muscle arterioles, shortens tail bleeding time, and enhances thrombosis in ADP-induced pulmonary thromboembolism and in FeCl3-induced carotid injury. GRK2-/- platelets have increased integrin activation, P-selectin exposure, and platelet aggregation in response to ADP stimulation. Furthermore, GRK2-/- platelets retain the ability to aggregate in response to ADP re-stimulation, indicating that GRK2 contributes to ADP receptor desensitization. Underlying these changes in GRK2-/- platelets is an increase in Ca2+ mobilization, RAP1 activation, and Akt phosphorylation stimulated by ADP, and an attenuated rise of cAMP levels in response to ADP in the presence of prostaglandin I2. P2Y12 antagonist treatment eliminates the phenotypic difference in platelet accumulation between WT and GRK2-/- mice at the site of injury. Pharmacologic inhibition of GRK2 activity in human platelets increases platelet activation in response to ADP. Finally, we show that GRK2 binds to endogenous Gβγ subunits during platelet activation. Collectively, these results show that GRK2 regulates ADP signaling via P2Y1 and P2Y12, interacts with Gβγ, and functions as a signaling hub in platelets for modulating the hemostatic response to injury.

The Predominant Role of Arrestin3 in General GPCR Desensitization in Platelets

Arrestins in concert with GPCR kinases (GRKs) function in G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) desensitization in various cells. Therefore, we characterized the functional differences of arrestin3 versus arrestin2 in the regulation of GPCR signaling and its desensitization in platelets using mice lacking arrestin3 and arrestin2. In contrast to arrestin2, platelet aggregation and dense granule secretion induced by 2-MeSADP, U46619, thrombin, and AYPGKF were significantly potentiated in arrestin3-deficient platelets compared to wild-type (WT) platelets, while non-GPCR agonist CRP-induced platelet aggregation and secretion were not affected. Surprisingly, in contrast to GRK6, platelet aggregation induced by the co-stimulation of serotonin and epinephrine was significantly potentiated in arrestin3-deficient platelets, suggesting the central role of arrestin3 in general GPCR desensitization in platelets. In addition, the second challenge of ADP and AYPGKF restored platelet aggregation in arrestin3-deficient platelets but failed to do so in WT and arrestin2-deficient platelets, confirming that arrestin3 contributes to GPCR desensitization. Furthermore, ADP- and AYPGKF-induced Akt and ERK phosphorylation were significantly increased in arrestin3-deficient platelets. Finally, we found that arrestin3 is critical for thrombus formation in vivo. In conclusion, arrestin3, not arrestin2, plays a central role in the regulation of platelet functional responses and thrombus formation through general GPCR desensitization in platelets.

The GRKs Reactome: Role in Cell Biology and Pathology

G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) are protein kinases that function in concert with arrestins in the regulation of a diverse class of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) signaling. Although GRKs and arrestins are key participants in the regulation of GPCR cascades, the complex regulatory mechanisms of GRK expression, its alternation, and their function are not thoroughly understood. Several studies together with the work from our lab in recent years have revealed the critical role of these kinases in various physiological and pathophysiological processes, including cardiovascular biology, inflammation and immunity, neurodegeneration, thrombosis, and hemostasis. A comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms underlying functional interactions with multiple receptor proteins and how these interactions take part in the development of various pathobiological processes may give rise to novel diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. In this review, we summarize the current research linking the role of GRKs to various aspects of cell biology, pathology, and therapeutics, with a particular focus on thrombosis and hemostasis.

The Roles of GRKs in Hemostasis and Thrombosis

Along with cancer, cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases remain by far the most common causes of death. Heart attacks and strokes are diseases in which platelets play a role, through activation on ruptured plaques and subsequent thrombus formation. Most platelet agonists activate platelets via G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), which make these receptors ideal targets for many antiplatelet drugs. However, little is known about the mechanisms that provide feedback regulation on GPCRs to limit platelet activation. Emerging evidence from our group and others strongly suggests that GPCR kinases (GRKs) are critical negative regulators during platelet activation and thrombus formation. In this review, we will summarize recent findings on the role of GRKs in platelet biology and how one specific GRK, GRK6, regulates the hemostatic response to vascular injury. Furthermore, we will discuss the potential role of GRKs in thrombotic disorders, such as thrombotic events in COVID-19 patients. Studies on the function of GRKs during platelet activation and thrombus formation have just recently begun, and a better understanding of the role of GRKs in hemostasis and thrombosis will provide a fruitful avenue for understanding the hemostatic response to injury. It may also lead to new therapeutic options for the treatment of thrombotic and cardiovascular disorders.