Patient-reported outcomes in HIV clinical trials evaluating antiretroviral treatment: a systematic review

Patient-Reported Outcomes After Switching to a 2-Drug Regimen of Fixed-Dose Combination Dolutegravir/Lamivudine: 48-Week Results from the SALSA Study

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) facilitate communication between patients and providers, enhancing patient-centered care. We report PROs for virologically suppressed people living with HIV-1 who switched to dolutegravir/lamivudine (DTG/3TC) or continued their 3- or 4-drug current antiretroviral regimen (CAR) in the phase 3 SALSA study. Secondary endpoints included change from baseline in HIV Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (status version; HIVTSQs) and HIV Symptom Distress Module (HIV-SDM) at Weeks 4, 24, and 48. A post hoc analysis assessed change in HIVTSQs and HIV-SDM by age (≥ 50 and < 50 years). Higher HIVTSQs scores represent greater treatment satisfaction (range, 0-60); lower HIV-SDM scores indicate less symptom bother (range, 0-80). Participants in the DTG/3TC (n = 246) and CAR (n = 247) groups reported comparable baseline HIVTSQs total scores (mean [SD], 55.2 [6.5] and 55.8 [5.5], respectively). Beginning at Week 4, mean HIVTSQs scores in the DTG/3TC group further increased vs. CAR and were sustained through Week 48. Baseline mean (SD) HIV-SDM symptom bother scores were comparable between the DTG/3TC (9.0 [9.9]) and CAR (7.9 [9.3]) groups. Small improvements in HIV-SDM scores favoring DTG/3TC were observed at Weeks 4 and 24 and sustained through Week 48 (though not significant between groups). Participants aged ≥ 50 and < 50 years who switched to DTG/3TC reported higher satisfaction and less symptom distress vs. CAR; these results were generally comparable between age groups. Participants who switched to DTG/3TC reported rapid and sustained improvements in treatment satisfaction compared with those who continued CAR, reinforcing the benefits of DTG/3TC beyond virologic suppression (NCT04021290; registration date, 7/11/2019).

Patient-reported outcome measures in adult HIV care: A rapid scoping review of targeted outcomes and instruments used

OBJECTIVE

There is international interest in the integration of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) into routine HIV care, but little work has synthesized the content of published initiatives. We conducted a rapid scoping review primarily to identify their selected patient-reported outcomes and respective instruments.

METHODS

Four databases were searched on 4 May 2022 (Medline, Embase, CINAHL and PsychINFO) for relevant English language documents published from 2005 onwards. Dual review of at least 20% of records, full texts and data extraction was performed. Outcomes and instruments were classified with an adapted 14-domain taxonomy. Instruments with evidence of validation were described.

RESULTS

Of 13 062 records generated for review, we retained a final sample of 94 documents, referring to 60 distinct initiatives led mostly in the USA (n = 29; 48% of initiatives), Europe (n = 16; 27%) and Africa (n = 9; 15%). The measured patient-reported outcome domains were: mental health (n = 42; 70%), substance use (n = 23; 38%), self-management (n = 16; 27%), symptoms (n = 12; 20%), sexual/reproductive health (n = 12; 20%), physical health (n = 9; 15%), treatment (n= 8; 13%), cognition (n = 7; 12%), quality of life (n = 7; 12%), violence/abuse (n = 6; 10%), stigma (n = 6; 10%), socioeconomic issues (n = 5; 8%), social support (n = 3; 5%) and body/facial appearance (n = 1; 2%). Initiatives measured 2.6 outcome domains, on average (range = 1-11). In total, 62 distinct validated PROMs were identified, with 53 initiatives (88%) employing at least one (M = 2.2). Overwhelmingly, the most used instrument was any version of the Patient Health Questionnaire to measure symptoms of depression, employed by over a third (26; 43%) of initiatives.

CONCLUSION

Published PROM initiatives in HIV care have spanned 19 countries and disproportionately target mental health and substance use.

Changes in health and sleep quality after anti-retroviral treatment modification in Japanese people living with HIV

BACKGROUND

Anti-retroviral treatment (ART) modification for treatment simplification is performed in virologically controlled people living with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (PLWH). However, studies on the impact of these stable treatment modifications on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measured using patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in clinical practice are scarce; this was the focus of this study.

METHODS

PLWH who visited Teikyo University Hospital between October 2019 and March 2021, and whose ART was changed to a newly recommended single-tablet regimen for treatment simplification, were included in the study. HRQoL and sleep quality were evaluated using the Short-Form (SF) 8 and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) global score, respectively, at two time points: before and after treatment modification. Comorbidities, duration of Human Immunodeficiency Virus diagnosis, ART initiation, ART regimens, and blood test data before and after treatment were assessed. The SF-8 was used to calculate the physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) scores.

RESULTS

Forty-nine patients (all male) were included into the study. There was no change in the PCS score before and after ART modification. The MCS score significantly improved from 48.50 ± 6.56 to 50.76 ± 4.37 (p = 0.0159). Thirteen patients' ARTs were changed to dolutegravir/lamivudine. Their HRQoL and sleep quality changes were further analyzed. Their MCS and PSQI scores had improved significantly. Thirty patients' ARTs were changed to bictegravir/tenofovir alafenamide/emtricitabine; however, there were no significant changes in their HRQoL or PSQI score.

CONCLUSION

ART modification for treatment simplification based on PROs may improve the HRQoL of PLWH.

Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) in HIV Infection: Points to Consider and Challenges

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to reach consensus on the use of PROs (patient-reported outcome measures) in people living with HIV (PLHIV).

METHODS

A scientific committee of professionals with experience in PROMs methodology issued recommendations and defined the points to support by evidence. A systematic review of the literature identified the coverage, utility, and psychometric properties of PROMs used in PLHIV. A Delphi survey was launched to measure the degree of agreement with the recommendations of a group of practicing clinicians and a group of patient representatives.

RESULTS

Four principles and ten recommendations were issued; however, the results of the Delphi showed significant differences in the opinion between health professionals and PLHIV, and polarization within collectives, hampering consensus.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a wealth of evidence on the benefit of PROMs, there are clear barriers to their use by healthcare professionals in HIV care. Intervention on these barriers is paramount to allow truly patient-centered care.

Substance Use-Related Intentional Nonadherence to Antiretroviral Therapy Among Young Adults Living with HIV

Antiretroviral therapy (ART) reduces HIV disease burden, increases life expectancy, and prevents HIV transmission. Previous research suggests that believing that it is harmful to take ART when using substances (i.e., interactive toxicity beliefs) leads to intentional ART nonadherence; however, these associations have not been investigated among younger adults living with HIV and have not been linked to clinical outcomes. We examined the associations among interactive toxicity beliefs, intentional nonadherence, and HIV clinical outcomes in young adults living with HIV. People living with HIV younger than the age of 36 years who tested positive for at least one substance use biomarker (N = 406) completed a 1-month pretrial run-in study that included computerized interviews, substance use biomarkers, HIV viral load, and unannounced pill counts for ART adherence. Analyses compared three HIV clinical outcome groups: (1) HIV viral unsuppressed, (2) HIV viral suppressed and ART nonadherent, and (3) HIV viral suppressed and ART adherent, on substance use, interactive toxicity beliefs, and substance use-related intentional ART nonadherence. Results showed that a majority of participants reported intentional nonadherence. Participants with unsuppressed HIV reported greater interactive toxicity beliefs and intentional nonadherence. We conclude that intentional nonadherence adds to the detrimental impacts of substance use on ART adherence and interactive toxicity beliefs that foster these behaviors may be amenable to interventions.