Sustained response with ixekizumab treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis with scalp involvement: results from three phase 3 trials (UNCOVER-1, UNCOVER-2, UNCOVER-3)

Efficacy of Ixekizumab in Chinese Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis and Special Body Area Involvement: Sub-analysis of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter Phase 3 Study

INTRODUCTION

Special body area involvement is common in psoriasis and can be challenging to treat. We investigated the efficacy of ixekizumab (IXE) in Chinese patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis and fingernail, scalp, or palmoplantar involvement.

METHODS

A post-hoc sub-analysis of a phase 3 trial, in which patients were randomized to receive placebo, IXE 80 mg every 2 (IXE Q2W) or 4 (IXE Q4W) weeks. At Week 12, patients classified as IXE responders [static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA) score of 0 or 1 [0,1)] were re-randomized (2:1) to IXE Q4W or placebo until Week 60. Efficacy was assessed by body-region specific parameters including Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI), Psoriasis Scalp Severity Index (PSSI), and Palmoplantar Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PPASI).

RESULTS

Of 438 patients, 99.1% (434) had ≥ 1 special area involvement [fingernail (76.5%, 335), scalp (97.3%, 426), palmoplantar (27.9%, 122)]. Significantly greater improvements from baseline in NAPSI score were observed with IXE Q4W and Q2W at Week 12 versus placebo (p < 0.001 for both). These improvements were further increased and sustained over 60 weeks in IXE Q4W and Q2W responders who were re-randomized to IXE Q4W, who achieved a 77.9% and 89.7% improvement from baseline, respectively, at Week 60. Significantly higher proportions of patients receiving IXE Q4W and Q2W achieved NAPSI 50 at Week 12 versus placebo (44.4%, 36.6% vs. 14.1%; p < 0.001 and < 0.01, respectively). Similarly, significantly higher proportions of patients receiving IXE Q4W and Q2W achieved PSSI 100 and PPASI 100 at Week 12 versus placebo (60.6% and 65.1% vs. 1.2%, and 67.4%, 84.3% vs. 21.4%, respectively; p < 0.001 for all comparisons). Improvements across all outcomes were sustained in patients re-randomized to IXE Q4W until Week 60.

CONCLUSION

IXE led to a rapid onset of action and sustained efficacy over 60 weeks in Chinese patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis and special body area involvement.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov identifier, NCT03364309.

Efficacy and safety of tildrakizumab for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis of the scalp: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase 3b study

BACKGROUND

Scalp psoriasis is common and difficult to treat.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate efficacy and safety of tildrakizumab for the treatment of scalp psoriasis.

METHODS

In this Phase 3b, randomized, double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled study (NCT03897088), patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis affecting the scalp (Investigator Global Assessment modified [IGA mod] 2011 [scalp] ≥3, Psoriasis Scalp Severity Index [PSSI] ≥12, ≥30% scalp surface area affected) received tildrakizumab 100 mg or PBO at W0 and W4. The primary endpoint was IGA mod 2011 (scalp) score of "clear" or "almost clear" with ≥2-point reduction from baseline at W16 (IGA mod 2011 [scalp] response). Key secondary endpoints were PSSI 90 response at W12 and W16 and IGA mod 2011 (scalp) response at W12. Safety was assessed from adverse events.

RESULTS

Of patients treated with tildrakizumab (n = 89) vs PBO (n = 82), 49.4% vs 7.3% achieved IGA mod 2011 (scalp) response at W16 (primary endpoint) and 46.1% vs 4.9% at W12; 60.7% vs 4.9% achieved PSSI 90 response at W16 and 48.3% vs 2.4% at W12 (all P < .00001). No serious treatment-related adverse events occurred.

LIMITATIONS

Only short-term data are presented.

CONCLUSION

Tildrakizumab was efficacious for the treatment of scalp psoriasis with no new safety signals.

Effectiveness of ixekizumab for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis with involvement of difficult-to-treat areas: A 52-week multicenter retrospective study

Biological drugs have dramatically changed the approach to treating moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, achieving excellent skin clearance and safety outcomes. However, the management of difficult-to-treat areas (e.g., scalp, palms/soles, nails, and genitalia) still represents a challenge in psoriasis treatment. Data in the literature on difficult-to-treat sites are limited and, frequently, no specific analysis is performed during clinical trials. We conducted a 52-week, retrospective study to evaluate the effectiveness of ixekizumab in 120 patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis of at least one difficult-to-treat area (scalp, palmoplantar surfaces, nails, and genitalia). Ninety-nine patients had scalp psoriasis, 35 had involvement of the palms or soles, 27 were affected by genital psoriasis, and 22 patients reported involvement of the nails. After 1 year of treatment, 96% of patients with scalp involvement, 95.6% of patients with palmoplantar psoriasis, 95.2% of patients with genital psoriasis, and 85% of patients with nail involvement achieved a site-specific Physician's Global Assessment of 0 or 1 (clear or almost clear). No serious adverse events were observed during the study. Our study supports the effectiveness of ixekizumab in plaque psoriasis involving difficult-to-treat sites.

Effectiveness of Ixekizumab in Chinese Patients with Moderate-Severe Plaque Psoriasis with Special Area Involvement: Subanalysis of a Prospective, Multicenter, Observational Real-World Study

INTRODUCTION

Ixekizumab, a monoclonal antibody against interleukin-17A, demonstrated effectiveness in the treatment of psoriasis in a Chinese real-world study that was consistent with previous randomized controlled trials. Here, we report further analyses from this study to explore the effectiveness of ixekizumab for treating patients with psoriasis and the involvement of special body areas (scalp, nail, joint, palmoplantar, or genital areas).

METHODS

A multicenter, prospective, observational, single-arm, post-marketing surveillance study was conducted in patients aged ≥ 18 years with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis and prescribed with ixekizumab in 26 Chinese hospitals. Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) scores were compared between patients with versus without psoriasis in special body areas in the overall study population and across subgroups by body area.

RESULTS

In total, 612 patients were included. At baseline, most patients (93.6%) had psoriasis involvement in at least one special body area. Overall, patients with psoriasis in special body areas reported a worse quality of life (QoL) than those without. Patients with versus without psoriasis in special body areas achieved a comparable mean reduction from baseline in PASI score (10.9 vs. 9.2 at week 2, and 16.9 vs. 14.7 at week 12, respectively) and DLQI score (6.0 vs. 4.4 at week 2, and 9.9 vs. 7.5 at week 12, respectively); a similar proportion of patients also achieved PASI 50 at week 2, and PASI 75 and PASI 90 at week 12, and a DLQI (0/1) at weeks 2 and 12. Several significantly different results were reported between subgroups, the majority of which favored patients with special body area involvement.

CONCLUSION

Most patients had psoriasis involvement in a special body area which was associated with worse QoL. Ixekizumab is similarly effective in reducing disease severity and improving QoL in patients with plaque psoriasis across different special body areas.

Ixekizumab for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: the first septennium

Ixekizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that specifically inhibits IL-17A. It has been approved for the treatment of adult and pediatric psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis and axial spondyloarthropathies by the US FDA and the EMA. Phase III trials, post hoc analyses and real-life data have reported its efficacy, effectiveness and safety. This review summarizes the latest evidence on the clinical efficacy, pharmacology and safety profile of ixekizumab for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis. A literature search was performed for articles published through December 2022. Ixekizumab is one of the most efficacious biologics for psoriasis, with a rapid onset of response, favorable long-term outcomes and an adequate safety profile.

IL17A Blockade with Ixekizumab Suppresses MuvB Signaling in Clinical Psoriasis

Unbiased informatics approaches have the potential to generate insights into uncharacterized signaling pathways in human disease. In this study, we generated longitudinal transcriptomic profiles of plaque psoriasis lesions from patients enrolled in a clinical trial of the anti-IL17A antibody ixekizumab (IXE). This dataset was then computed against a curated matrix of over 700 million data points derived from published psoriasis and signaling node perturbation transcriptomic and chromatin immunoprecipitation-sequencing datasets. We observed substantive enrichment within both psoriasis-induced and IXE-repressed gene sets of transcriptional targets of members of the MuvB complex, a master regulator of the mitotic cell cycle. These gene sets were similarly enriched for pathways involved in the regulation of the G2/M transition of the cell cycle. Moreover, transcriptional targets for MuvB nodes were strongly enriched within IXE-repressed genes whose expression levels correlated strongly with the extent and severity of the psoriatic disease. In models of human keratinocyte proliferation, genes encoding MuvB nodes were transcriptionally repressed by IXE, and depletion of MuvB nodes reduced cell proliferation. Finally, we made the expression and regulatory networks that supported this study available as a freely accessible, cloud-based hypothesis generation platform. Our study positions inhibition of MuvB signaling as an important determinant of the therapeutic impact of IXE in psoriasis.

Efficacy of guselkumab in difficult-to-treat psoriasis regions: Data from VOYAGE 1 and VOYAGE 2 Asian subpopulations

Patients with psoriasis were randomized to guselkumab, placebo or adalimumab in the VOYAGE 1 and VOYAGE 2 studies. In this post hoc analysis, difficult-to-treat psoriasis regions in the Asian subpopulation for both the guselkumab and adalimumab groups were compared with placebo at week 16 and the active treatment groups were compared at week 24. Endpoints included patients achieving scores of 0 or 1 (clear or near clear) or 0 (clear) on the scalp-specific Investigator's Global Assessment (ss-IGA), Physician's Global Assessment of the hands and/or feet (hf-PGA), and fingernail PGA (f-PGA), and percentage improvement in target Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score through week 24. Efficacy was also assessed by prior biologic experience at baseline. A total of 199 eligible Asian patients were included. The proportion of patients achieving "clear" or "near clear" with guselkumab was superior to adalimumab at week 24 for scalp psoriasis ss-IGA (Asian patients, 72 [85.7%] vs 35 [67.3%], P = 0.004), hands and/or feet psoriasis hf-PGA (29 [82.9%] vs 16 [61.5%], P = 0.054), and similar for fingernail psoriasis f-PGA (28 [63.6%] vs 17 [54.8%], P = 0.412). Guselkumab mean improvements in NAPSI were comparable to adalimumab (39.9% vs 35.9%, P = 0.618). Overall, the complete clearance response of scalp, and hands and/or feet at week 24 occurred in a greater proportion of patients in the guselkumab group, irrespective of baseline biologic status (treatment-naïve or treatment-experienced). Guselkumab was superior to adalimumab for the treatment of scalp, and hands and/or feet psoriasis, and proportionally higher for fingernail psoriasis. Findings were comparable to the global study population.

Ixekizumab and brodalumab indirect comparison in the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis: results from an Italian single-centre retrospective study in a real-life setting

BACKGROUND

Eleven biologic drugs are currently approved for psoriasis management. Real-life studies are needed to guide clinicians in choosing a tailored-tail therapy. The aim of our retrospective study is to indirectly compare the efficacy and safety of ixekizumab and brodalumab in psoriasis patients.

METHODS

A single-centre real-life retrospective study was performed enrolling moderate-to-severe psoriatic patients under biologic treatment with ixekizumab or brodalumab. For each patient, clinical and demographic data were collected and the effectiveness and safety of brodalumab and ixekizumab treatment were evaluated at weeks 4, 12 and 24. Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) and Body Surface Area (BSA) were used for psoriasis severity.

RESULTS

A total of 139 patients were included in the study: 98(70.5%) and 41(29.5%) patients received ixekizumab and brodalumab, respectively. Mean PASI and BSA significantly reduced at each follow up for both ixekizumab and brodalumab groups. Even if ixekizumab reached higher rates of PASI90 and PASI100 than brodalumab (PASI90: 43.8%vs39.0% PASI100: 20.4%vs17.1% at week4 and PASI90: 83.6%vs75.6% PASI100: 71.5%vs60.9% at week24), these results were not statistically significant. Adverse events, mainly mild, were registered in 25.5% of ixekizumab and 26.8% of brodalumab group, respectively. Discontinuation rate was higher for brodalumab (17.1%vs9.1%), without statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed comparable efficacy and safety for ixekizumab and brodalumab.

Scalp Psoriasis and Biologic Agents: A Review

Scalp-localized psoriasis is common among patients affected with plaque psoriasis, rendering its treatment exceedingly difficult. Furthermore, the symptoms caused by the disease like scaling, erythema, and pruritus, among others, pose a major psychological impact and a significant regression in the quality of life of the affected patients. Biologics have proved their efficacy in assuaging the symptoms, in terms of Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) reduction, and offering optimum quality of life, by decreasing the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) in the patients suffering from plaque psoriasis. Herein, we sought to evaluate the efficacy of biologics and small molecules in controlling the symptoms and their ability to offer long-term maintenance in the disease activity.

Scalp Psoriasis: A Literature Review of Effective Therapies and Updated Recommendations for Practical Management

The scalp is one of the most commonly affected regions in psoriasis. However, scalp psoriasis can be difficult to treat because of challenges in the delivery of therapy. Effective therapeutic regimens for scalp psoriasis are essential to improving the quality of life of patients. Recent data on topical therapies, phototherapy, systemic agents, and complementary therapy have demonstrated that it is possible to achieve and maintain significant improvement in scalp psoriasis. In this review, efficacy data for these modalities and an algorithm for the practical management of scalp psoriasis are presented.

Therapeutic update of biologics and small molecules for scalp psoriasis: a systematic review

Scalp psoriasis represents the most common difficult-to-treat area in psoriasis patients. Its presence is linked to severe discomfort and impairment of quality of life given the associated symptoms (most of all, scaling and pruritus) and the location in a highly visible area, thus a prompt treatment is required. Its management may be challenging as the scalp is quite sensitive to long-term treatment with topical corticosteroids and usually resistant to topical and systemic agents. Likely, the currently available therapeutic armamentarium has been enriched with biologicals and small molecules that revolutionized psoriasis treatment and that of scalp psoriasis. Nevertheless, the lack of international dedicated guidelines pushed us to perform a comprehensive review on the efficacy and safety of biologics and small molecules on scalp psoriasis with the aim to put the basis for a therapeutic algorithm. After reviewing all the available evidence on the short-term and long-term efficacy of biologics and small molecules on scalp psoriasis the use of the newest biologics (anti-IL-17 and anti-IL-23) seems to be linked to the highest clinical performances in controlling scalp psoriasis. However, head-to-head comparisons between different biologics or biologics and small molecules are lacking. Hence, treatment selection should always be individualized.

Understanding characteristics of patients newly initiating ixekizumab: findings from the Corrona Psoriasis Registry

Background: Real-world data on patients newly initiating ixekizumab is limited. Our study describes the characteristics of patients who initiated ixekizumab and other biologics for psoriasis treatment in North American dermatological practices. Materials & methods: Characteristics of patients ascertained at registry enrollment are described via means and frequencies. Results: Compared with other biologic initiators, ixekizumab initiators had: longer disease duration (17.1 vs 15.1 years); more were considered least severe by body surface area (33 vs 26%); moderate-to-severe by IGA (56 vs 48%); were biologic-experienced (80 vs 52%); obese (54 vs 47%); and experienced greater impact in work productivity (5.3 vs 2.9%) versus other biologic initiators. Conclusion: Psoriasis patients initiating ixekizumab had more severe disease, biologic experience, and worse patient-reported outcomes than those initiating other biologics.

Disease response and patient-reported outcomes among initiators of ixekizumab

OBJECTIVES

There is limited real-world evidence on using ixekizumab in psoriasis patients. Therefore, we characterized patients with psoriasis initiating ixekizumab and report 6-month changes in disease and patient-reported outcomes.

METHODS

Adult patients with psoriasis who initiated ixekizumab and completed a 6-month follow-up visit were enrolled from the Corrona Psoriasis Registry. Disease characteristics and outcomes were assessed at ixekizumab initiation. Outcomes included the mean 6-month change in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), body surface area (BSA), Investigator Global Assessment (IGA), and IGA*BSA.

RESULTS

From baseline to follow-up in all patients (n = 136), means decreased for IGA*BSA (-45.5) and BSA (-12.4), and a higher % achieved an absolute PASI ≤ 5 (84.6%), BSA 0-3 (72.1%), and IGA 0/1 (50.7%). Within stratified groups, means decreased for PASI <12 for IGA*BSA (-21.1) and BSA (-6.3); PASI≥12 for IGA*BSA (-94.8) and BSA (-24.6); weight <100 kg for IGA*BSA (-45.1) and BSA (-12.4); weight ≥100 kg for IGA*BSA (-46.2) and BSA (-12.3); concomitant PsA for IGA*BSA (-56.0) and BSA (-15.3); and in no concomitant PsA for IGA*BSA (-36.9) and BSA (-10.0).

CONCLUSIONS

We provide real-world evidence on the benefits of ixekizumab for treating psoriasis, regardless of baseline disease severity, weight, or concomitant PsA.

A subset analysis of efficacy and safety outcomes from phase 3 clinical studies of ixekizumab for the treatment of patients with severe plaque psoriasis

Background: Factors beyond the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) contribute to disease severity in psoriasis and potentially affect treatment responses.Objective: This subset analysis of data from two phase 3 clinical studies assessed baseline parameters in patients with different degrees of psoriasis severity in order to determine treatment responses to ixekizumab and safety outcomes.Methods: This study used integrated data from the UNCOVER-2 and -3 trials involving 2709 patients with chronic plaque psoriasis to assess the efficacy and safety of ixekizumab in three subgroups of patients, defined by PASI > 15 (group 1), PASI > 15 and history of ≥3 non-biologic systemic therapies (group 2), or PASI = 12-15 (group 3).Results: In groups 1 and 2, additional baseline features were identified that could influence treatment responses, including age at disease onset, Dermatology Life Quality Index, and work productivity. Irrespective of subgroup, ixekizumab demonstrated high PASI responses at weeks 12 and 60, which were evident as early as week 2. Adverse events did not differ across subgroups.Conclusion: Our data support the efficacy, early onset of action, and maintained response of ixekizumab as observed in previous trials, and highlight the complexity of comprehensively defining disease severity in psoriasis.

Treatment of psoriasis: janus kinases inhibitors and biologics for the interleukin-23/Th17 axis

With the discovery of the IL-23 / Th17 axis, the treatment of psoriasis has entered a new era. The aim of this study was to explore the progress of biologics and janus kinases (JAK) inhibitors targeting IL-23/Th17 axis in the treatment of psoriasis. review of English-language article was performed. Search terms included IL-17, IL-23, biologics, monoclonal antibodies, neutralizing antibodies, JAK, inhibitors, Psoriasis Area Severity Index and psoriasis. Data were selected from two phase 2 clinical trials; and nine phase 3 randomized, double-blind clinical trials; and other clinical trials. This review analyzes skin lesion clearance and major adverse reactions of 9 mAbs including mirikizumab and bimekizumab. At the same time, the research progress and prospects of three non-IgG small molecule biologics are analyzed too. This paper also compares the efficacy and limitations of biologics targeting the IL-23/Th17 axis with non-biologics acting on the JAK-signal transducer and activator of transcription pathway. The IL-17A/F inhibitors and non-IgG small molecule biologics that are being studied will bring a revolutionary development to the treatment of psoriasis. Topical application of JAK inhibitors can not only achieve the purpose of treating psoriasis, but also reduce the amounts of systemic medication, and reduces side effects. Each drug has its own indication, and the effect of the drug can be better achieved by selecting the indication for the drug.

Anti IL-17 in psoriasis

Introduction: Psoriasis is a chronic, immune-mediated disease with significant associated comorbidities. Its pathogenesis is likely multifactorial, however, the interleukin-23/T helper 17 pathway has been identified as a critical axis in its pathogenesis. Interleukin-17A is the primary effector of this pathway and overexpression of IL-17A results in epidermal hyperplasia and an overly robust inflammatory response, resulting in the skin plaques and systemic inflammation seen in psoriasis. Targeted anti IL-17 therapies have demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.Areas covered: A PubMed search was conducted for relevant literature. Secukinumab, ixekizumab, and brodalumab are anti IL-17 inhibitors currently approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. The efficacy and safety data from key phase III clinical trials are reviewed here.Expert opinion: By targeting a key mediator of the interleukin-23/T helper 17 pathway, IL-17 antagonists are an effective treatment for plaque psoriasis. It has demonstrated efficacy and a favorable safety profile in key phase III clinical trials. In addition to efficacy, IL-17 antagonists have also shown long-term maintenance of treatment response and a quick onset of action. The efficacy of IL-17 inhibitors in the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis underscores the importance of the IL-23/Th17 pathway in the pathogenesis of psoriasis.

Efficacy of Guselkumab Compared With Adalimumab and Placebo for Psoriasis in Specific Body Regions: A Secondary Analysis of 2 Randomized Clinical Trials

Importance

Psoriasis of the scalp, palms and/or soles, and nails is challenging to treat.

Objective

To evaluate the effect of guselkumab on psoriasis in specific body regions.

Design, Setting, and Participants

VOYAGE 1 and VOYAGE 2 were, double-blind, placebo- and adalimumab-controlled studies of guselkumab conducted at 101 and 115 global sites, respectively, from November 3, 2014, to May 19, 2016. Patients had moderate to severe plaque psoriasis (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score ≥12, Investigator's Global Assessment [IGA] score ≥3, and ≥10% body surface area with psoriasis). This post hoc data analysis was performed from February 10 through November 15, 2017.

Exposures

Patients were randomized to guselkumab, 100 mg (weeks 0 and 4, then every 8 weeks); placebo followed by guselkumab, 100 mg, starting at week 16; or adalimumab (80 mg [week 0] and 40 mg [week 1, then every 2 weeks]).

Main Outcomes and Measures

Efficacy was assessed through week 24. End points included numbers of patients achieving scores of 0 or 1 (clear or near clear) or 0 (clear) on the scalp-specific IGA (ss-IGA), Physician's Global Assessment of the hands and/or feet (hf-PGA), and fingernail PGA (f-PGA) and percentage of improvement in target Nail Psoriasis Severity Index score.

Results

Of 1829 randomized patients (mean [SD] age, 43.6 [12.4] years; 1300 [71.1%] male, 1498 [81.9%] white), 1576 (86.2%) had psoriasis of the scalp; 501 (27.4%), palms and/or soles; and 1049 (57.4%), fingernails. At baseline, 1512 (82.7%), 461 (25.2%), and 928 (50.7%) patients had a score of 2 or higher on the ss-IGA, hf-PGA, and f-PGA, respectively, and were included in the analysis. Guselkumab was superior to placebo based on the proportion of patients achieving an ss-IGA score of 0 or 1 (560 [81.8%] vs 43 [12.4%]) at week 16 and to adalimumab (582 [85.0%] vs 329 [68.5%]) at week 24 (both P < .001); 479 (69.9%) in the guselkumab group vs 270 (56.3%) in the adalimumab group achieved an ss-IGA score of 0 (all P < .001). An hf-PGA score of 0 or 1 was achieved by 154 patients (75.5%) in the guselkumab group vs 15 (14.2%) in the placebo group at week 16 and 164 (80.4%) in the guselkumab group vs 91 (60.3%) in the adalimumab group at week 24; 153 (75.0%) in the guselkumab group vs 76 (50.3%) in the adalimumab group achieved an hf-PGA score of 0 (all P < .001). An f-PGA score of 0 or 1 was achieved by 196 patients (46.7%) in the guselkumab group vs 32 (15.2%) in the placebo group at week 16 (P < .001) and 252 (60.0%) in the guselkumab group vs 191 (64.3%) in the adalimumab group at week 24 (P = .11); 115 (27.4%) in the guselkumab group vs 83 (27.9%) in the adalimumab group achieved an f-PGA score of 0 (P = .63).

Conclusions and Relevance

Compared with adalimumab, guselkumab was associated with significant improvement in psoriasis on the scalp and palms and/or soles; magnitude of improvement in fingernails did not differ between treatments. These results may help dermatologists make treatment decisions for patients with psoriasis in difficult-to-treat body regions.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT02207231 and NCT02207244.

Joint AAD-NPF guidelines of care for the management and treatment of psoriasis with biologics

Psoriasis is a chronic, inflammatory multisystem disease that affects up to 3.2% of the US population. This guideline addresses important clinical questions that arise in psoriasis management and care, providing recommendations based on the available evidence. The treatment of psoriasis with biologic agents will be reviewed, emphasizing treatment recommendations and the role of the dermatologist in monitoring and educating patients regarding benefits as well as associated risks.

Treating to Target(s) With Interleukin-17 Inhibitors

Background:

The treat-to-target (T2T) strategy has become established in several medical specialties as a key guidance to optimal therapeutic decision making. T2T may be effective in the assessment of the biologic class of agents called interleukin (IL)-17 inhibitors, which are emerging as a safe and effective treatment option for autoimmune inflammatory conditions such as plaque psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and ankylosing spondylitis (AS).

Objective:

The objective of this article is to use a T2T approach for the evaluation of the effectiveness and safety of IL-17 inhibitors in the management of patients with plaque psoriasis, PsA, and AS.

Methods:

Following a comprehensive literature search, a full-day meeting was convened to discuss and identify the T2T targets for psoriasis, PsA, and AS. Clinical trial evidence was presented for the approved IL-17 inhibitors—secukinumab, ixekizumab, and brodalumab—to assess whether these data meet T2T safety and efficacy targets.

Results:

All 3 approved agents were significantly superior to placebo and active controls in the achievement of T2T targets for psoriasis. Secukinumab and ixekizumab were likewise associated with significantly better outcomes than controls in the PsA targets, and secukinumab resulted in significant AS target improvements vs placebo. The IL-17 inhibitors were also associated with low rates of serious adverse events and exacerbations of common comorbid conditions.

Conclusion:

Phase III trial results support the T2T benefit and safety of IL-17 inhibitors according to their specific indications for the management of patients with plaque psoriasis, PsA, and AS.

Ixekizumab for the treatment of psoriasis: an update on new data since first approval

Introduction: Psoriasis is a chronic immune-mediated skin disease with a multifactorial etiology. Studies have shown that the inflammatory cytokine interleukin-17A (IL-17A) is a key mediator in the pathogenesis. Targeted biologics have changed the outcome for patients in a variety of diseases including psoriasis. Ixekizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody directed against IL-17A and it has been approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, and recently also psoriatic arthritis. Areas covered: In this review, we summarize the latest clinical study results on ixekizumab. Long-term Phase III study data on efficacy and safety are now available for both plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Additionally, new indications for ixekizumab are under investigation. Expert commentary: Overall, the efficacy and safety of ixekizumab are promising. In plaque psoriasis, the efficacy of ixekizumab was superior to etanercept and ustekinumab, while the efficacy was comparable to adalimumab in psoriatic arthritis. The safety profile has also been found very tolerable and similar to other biologics; however, vigilance regarding non-invasive Candida infections is necessary. Also, caution is advised when treating patients with concomitant inflammatory bowel disease, since ixekizumab could cause exacerbations. Long-term studies in real-life treatment settings are needed to decide the actual potential and safety of ixekizumab.

Ixekizumab: A Review of Its Use for the Management of Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis

Objective: To review the efficacy, safety, and place in therapy of ixekizumab for the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Data Sources: PubMed (1966 to July 2018) and clinicaltrials.gov were searched using the terms ixekizumab, LY2439821, interleukin-17, and psoriasis. Study Selection and Data Extraction: Human studies published in peer-reviewed medical journals in English were used. Data Synthesis: The efficacy and safety of ixekizumab has been primarily reported by 4 phase III trials (UNCOVER-1, UNCOVER-2, UNCOVER-3, and UNCOVER-J) and multiple post hoc analyses. The average proportions of patients achieving a 75%, 90%, and 100% reduction in their Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) were 89%, 70%, and 38%, respectively, after 12 weeks of therapy. PASI75 was maintained for up to 3 years in 80.5% of participants. Ixekizumab was statistically significantly more effective than ustekinumab, with 76.5%, compared with 59%, of patients achieving PASI90 in 52 weeks. The most common adverse events include nasopharyngitis (14.1%), upper respiratory tract infections (7.9%), and injection-site reactions (6.8%), which are similar to that for other biological agents. The risk of inflammatory bowel disease may be increased with ixekizumab. Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice: This review summarizes and evaluates clinical data regarding the efficacy and safety of ixekizumab and discusses relevant differences compared with other biological agents used for the management of chronic plaque psoriasis. Conclusions: Ixekizumab is a highly efficacious and well-tolerated treatment option for patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.

Underdiagnosed and undertreated psoriasis: Nuances of treating psoriasis affecting the scalp, face, intertriginous areas, genitals, hands, feet, and nails

Psoriasis of the scalp, face, intertriginous areas, genitals, hands, feet, and nails is often underdiagnosed, and disease management can be challenging. Despite the small surface area commonly affected by psoriasis in these locations, patients have disproportionate levels of physical impairment and emotional distress. Limitations in current disease severity indices do not fully capture the impact of disease on a patient's quality of life, and, combined with limitations in current therapies, many patients do not receive proper or adequate care. In this review, we discuss the clinical manifestations of psoriasis in these less commonly diagnosed areas and its impact on patient quality of life. We also examine clinical studies evaluating the effectiveness of therapies on psoriasis in these regions. This article highlights the need to individualize treatment strategies for psoriasis based on the area of the body that is affected and the emerging role of biologic therapy in this regard.

Spotlight on ixekizumab for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: design, development, and use in therapy

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory disease affecting up to 3% of the general population, associated with discomfort and impaired quality of life. In recent years, the pathogenic cytokine network of psoriasis has been extensively studied leading to the development of new treatments that provide greater efficacy. Interleukin 17A (IL-17A) has been recognized as a crucial cytokine that mediates immunopathogenesis of psoriasis. Ixekizumab – indicated for the treatment of adults with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis – is a subcutaneously administered humanized monoclonal antibody that targets IL-17A. A large percentage of patients affected by psoriasis achieved consistent benefits in terms of disease control and rapid onset of action during clinical trials. Overall, ixekizumab brought clinical improvement and a favorable safety profile in phase III trials. Ixekizumab is characterized by consistent efficacy and rapid onset of response; it is not influenced by previous exposure to biologics and has shown good results in areas that are difficult to treat and in severe clinical variants of psoriasis. Ixekizumab has shown significant improvements in the activity of the disease and in those physical functions that inhibit radiographic progression in patients with concomitant involvement of joints. Our data support ixekizumab as a successful therapeutic option for patients affected by moderate-to-severe plaque-type psoriasis.

Role of IL-17 in plaque psoriasis: therapeutic potential of ixekizumab

Developments in the understanding of the immunopathogenesis of psoriasis have identified interleukin (IL)-17 as the key proinflammatory cytokine in the pathogenesis of plaque psoriasis, with the consequent development of drugs that target this cytokine or associated receptors. Ixekizumab is a subcutaneously administered humanized monoclonal antibody, which acts to neutralize IL-17A. This article reviews the role of IL-17 in the pathogenesis of psoriasis, the biological and pharmacokinetics of ixekizumab and the safety profile and the clinical efficacy of ixekizumab in Phase III clinical trials. Phase III clinical trials of ixekizumab have so far demonstrated excellent early clinical efficacy, with a comparable safety profile to the existing biologic therapies for psoriasis. To further assess its position in the treatment algorithm for psoriasis, a further head to head RCT with secukinumab could be established, alongside comparative effectiveness studies from observational research. In addition, trials are needed to assess its role in those with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors/ustekinumab resistant disease. However, it is clear that the IL-17 antagonists have changed the benchmark for clinical efficacy, and it is likely that ixekizumab along with the other IL-17 antagonists are set to achieve a new standard of care in the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.