3
|
McDevitt AW, Young JL, Cleland JA, Hiefield P, Snodgrass SJ. Physical therapy interventions used to treat individuals with biceps tendinopathy: a scoping review. Braz J Phys Ther 2024; 28:100586. [PMID: 38219522 PMCID: PMC10825607 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2023.100586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2022] [Revised: 11/23/2023] [Accepted: 12/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/16/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Shoulder pain related to pathology of the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) can be debilitating. Chronic LHBT tendinopathy is a common condition that is difficult to treat. Little consensus exists regarding the optimal approach to treating individuals with LHBT tendinopathy. OBJECTIVE To systematically scope the literature to identify and present the available information regarding physical therapist interventions used for the management of individuals with LHBT tendinopathy including types of interventions used or recommended. METHODS A scoping review of physical therapist interventions used to treat LHBT was conducted of the CINAHL, Embase, Medline, and SportDiscus databases. Full text records reporting physical therapist-based interventions in individuals with proximal LHBT pathology were included. Articles not written in English were excluded. RESULTS Of the 4059 records identified, 14 articles met the inclusion criteria. Interventions used to treat LHBT tendinopathy identified in quantitative studies included: extracorporeal shock wave therapy, polarized light, ultrasound, low-level laser, iontophoresis, general exercise, eccentric training, stretching, dry needling, and joint mobilization. Interventions described in literature reviews, clinical commentaries, and a Delphi study included: therapeutic modalities, manual therapy, exercise, dry needling, and patient education. CONCLUSION This scoping review reported interventions primarily based on therapeutic modalities in quantitative studies while literature reviews, clinical commentaries, and a Delphi study described the addition of manual therapy, patient education, exercise, and dry needling. Overall, there is a dearth of evidence detailing the conservative management of LHBT tendinopathy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy W McDevitt
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Program, Aurora, CO, United States of America; Discipline of Physiotherapy, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.
| | - Jodi L Young
- Bellin College, Doctor of Science in Physical Therapy Program, Green Bay, WI, United States of America
| | - Joshua A Cleland
- Tufts University School of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Doctor of Physical Therapy Program, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Paisley Hiefield
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Program, Aurora, CO, United States of America
| | - Suzanne J Snodgrass
- Discipline of Physiotherapy, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cooper K, Alexander L, Brandie D, Brown VT, Greig L, Harrison I, MacLean C, Mitchell L, Morrissey D, Moss RA, Parkinson E, Pavlova AV, Shim J, Swinton PA. Exercise therapy for tendinopathy: a mixed-methods evidence synthesis exploring feasibility, acceptability and effectiveness. Health Technol Assess 2023; 27:1-389. [PMID: 37929629 PMCID: PMC10641714 DOI: 10.3310/tfws2748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Tendinopathy is a common, painful and functionally limiting condition, primarily managed conservatively using exercise therapy. Review questions (i) What exercise interventions have been reported in the literature for which tendinopathies? (ii) What outcomes have been reported in studies investigating exercise interventions for tendinopathy? (iii) Which exercise interventions are most effective across all tendinopathies? (iv) Does type/location of tendinopathy or other specific covariates affect which are the most effective exercise therapies? (v) How feasible and acceptable are exercise interventions for tendinopathies? Methods A scoping review mapped exercise interventions for tendinopathies and outcomes reported to date (questions i and ii). Thereafter, two contingent systematic review workstreams were conducted. The first investigated a large number of studies and was split into three efficacy reviews that quantified and compared efficacy across different interventions (question iii), and investigated the influence of a range of potential moderators (question iv). The second was a convergent segregated mixed-method review (question v). Searches for studies published from 1998 were conducted in library databases (n = 9), trial registries (n = 6), grey literature databases (n = 5) and Google Scholar. Scoping review searches were completed on 28 April 2020 with efficacy and mixed-method search updates conducted on 19 January 2021 and 29 March 2021. Results Scoping review - 555 included studies identified a range of exercise interventions and outcomes across a range of tendinopathies, most commonly Achilles, patellar, lateral elbow and rotator cuff-related shoulder pain. Strengthening exercise was most common, with flexibility exercise used primarily in the upper limb. Disability was the most common outcome measured in Achilles, patellar and rotator cuff-related shoulder pain; physical function capacity was most common in lateral elbow tendinopathy. Efficacy reviews - 204 studies provided evidence that exercise therapy is safe and beneficial, and that patients are generally satisfied with treatment outcome and perceive the improvement to be substantial. In the context of generally low and very low-quality evidence, results identified that: (1) the shoulder may benefit more from flexibility (effect sizeResistance:Flexibility = 0.18 [95% CrI 0.07 to 0.29]) and proprioception (effect sizeResistance:Proprioception = 0.16 [95% CrI -1.8 to 0.32]); (2) when performing strengthening exercise it may be most beneficial to combine concentric and eccentric modes (effect sizeEccentricOnly:Concentric+Eccentric = 0.48 [95% CrI -0.13 to 1.1]; and (3) exercise may be most beneficial when combined with another conservative modality (e.g. injection or electro-therapy increasing effect size by ≈0.1 to 0.3). Mixed-method review - 94 studies (11 qualitative) provided evidence that exercise interventions for tendinopathy can largely be considered feasible and acceptable, and that several important factors should be considered when prescribing exercise for tendinopathy, including an awareness of potential barriers to and facilitators of engaging with exercise, patients' and providers' prior experience and beliefs, and the importance of patient education, self-management and the patient-healthcare professional relationship. Limitations Despite a large body of literature on exercise for tendinopathy, there are methodological and reporting limitations that influenced the recommendations that could be made. Conclusion The findings provide some support for the use of exercise combined with another conservative modality; flexibility and proprioception exercise for the shoulder; and a combination of eccentric and concentric strengthening exercise across tendinopathies. However, the findings must be interpreted within the context of the quality of the available evidence. Future work There is an urgent need for high-quality efficacy, effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and qualitative research that is adequately reported, using common terminology, definitions and outcomes. Study registration This project is registered as DOI: 10.11124/JBIES-20-00175 (scoping review); PROSPERO CRD 42020168187 (efficacy reviews); https://osf.io/preprints/sportrxiv/y7sk6/ (efficacy review 1); https://osf.io/preprints/sportrxiv/eyxgk/ (efficacy review 2); https://osf.io/preprints/sportrxiv/mx5pv/ (efficacy review 3); PROSPERO CRD42020164641 (mixed-method review). Funding This project was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) HTA programme and will be published in full in HTA Journal; Vol. 27, No. 24. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kay Cooper
- School of Health Sciences, Robert Gordon University, Garthdee Road, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Lyndsay Alexander
- School of Health Sciences, Robert Gordon University, Garthdee Road, Aberdeen, UK
| | - David Brandie
- Sportscotland Institute of Sport, Airthrey Road, Stirling, UK
| | | | - Leon Greig
- School of Health Sciences, Robert Gordon University, Garthdee Road, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Isabelle Harrison
- School of Health Sciences, Robert Gordon University, Garthdee Road, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Colin MacLean
- Library Services, Robert Gordon University, Garthdee Road, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Laura Mitchell
- NHS Grampian, Physiotherapy Department, Ellon Health Centre, Schoolhill, Ellon, Aberdeenshire, UK
| | - Dylan Morrissey
- William Harvey Research Institute, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Hospital, Bancroft Road, London, UK
| | - Rachel Ann Moss
- School of Health Sciences, Robert Gordon University, Garthdee Road, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Eva Parkinson
- School of Health Sciences, Robert Gordon University, Garthdee Road, Aberdeen, UK
| | | | - Joanna Shim
- School of Health Sciences, Robert Gordon University, Garthdee Road, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Paul Alan Swinton
- School of Health Sciences, Robert Gordon University, Garthdee Road, Aberdeen, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Luo J, Wang Z, Tang C, Yin Z, Huang J, Ruan D, Fei Y, Wang C, Mo X, Li J, Zhang J, Fang C, Li J, Chen X, Shen W. Animal model for tendinopathy. J Orthop Translat 2023; 42:43-56. [PMID: 37637777 PMCID: PMC10450357 DOI: 10.1016/j.jot.2023.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2023] [Revised: 06/18/2023] [Accepted: 06/30/2023] [Indexed: 08/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Tendinopathy is a common motor system disease that leads to pain and reduced function. Despite its prevalence, our mechanistic understanding is incomplete, leading to limited efficacy of treatment options. Animal models contribute significantly to our understanding of tendinopathy and some therapeutic options. However, the inadequacies of animal models are also evident, largely due to differences in anatomical structure and the complexity of human tendinopathy. Different animal models reproduce different aspects of human tendinopathy and are therefore suitable for different scenarios. This review aims to summarize the existing animal models of tendinopathy and to determine the situations in which each model is appropriate for use, including exploring disease mechanisms and evaluating therapeutic effects. Methods We reviewed relevant literature in the PubMed database from January 2000 to December 2022 using the specific terms ((tendinopathy) OR (tendinitis)) AND (model) AND ((mice) OR (rat) OR (rabbit) OR (lapin) OR (dog) OR (canine) OR (sheep) OR (goat) OR (horse) OR (equine) OR (pig) OR (swine) OR (primate)). This review summarized different methods for establishing animal models of tendinopathy and classified them according to the pathogenesis they simulate. We then discussed the advantages and disadvantages of each model, and based on this, identified the situations in which each model was suitable for application. Results For studies that aim to study the pathophysiology of tendinopathy, naturally occurring models, treadmill models, subacromial impingement models and metabolic models are ideal. They are closest to the natural process of tendinopathy in humans. For studies that aim to evaluate the efficacy of possible treatments, the selection should be made according to the pathogenesis simulated by the modeling method. Existing tendinopathy models can be classified into six types according to the pathogenesis they simulate: extracellular matrix synthesis-decomposition imbalance, inflammation, oxidative stress, metabolic disorder, traumatism and mechanical load. Conclusions The critical factor affecting the translational value of research results is whether the selected model is matched with the research purpose. There is no single optimal model for inducing tendinopathy, and researchers must select the model that is most appropriate for the study they are conducting. The translational potential of this article The critical factor affecting the translational value of research results is whether the animal model used is compatible with the research purpose. This paper provides a rationale and practical guide for the establishment and selection of animal models of tendinopathy, which is helpful to improve the clinical transformation ability of existing models and develop new models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junchao Luo
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, 310058, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Orthopedics Research Institute of Zhejiang University, 310058, Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province, China
- Sports Medicine Institute of Zhejiang University, 310058, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Key Laboratory of Motor System Disease Research and Precision Therapy of Zhejiang Province, 315825, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Clinical Research Center of Motor System Disease of Zhejiang Province, 315825, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Dr. Li Dak Sum and Yip Yio Chin Center for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Zhejiang University, 310058, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Zetao Wang
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, 310058, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Orthopedics Research Institute of Zhejiang University, 310058, Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province, China
- Sports Medicine Institute of Zhejiang University, 310058, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Key Laboratory of Motor System Disease Research and Precision Therapy of Zhejiang Province, 315825, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Clinical Research Center of Motor System Disease of Zhejiang Province, 315825, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Dr. Li Dak Sum and Yip Yio Chin Center for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Zhejiang University, 310058, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Chenqi Tang
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, 310058, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Orthopedics Research Institute of Zhejiang University, 310058, Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province, China
- Sports Medicine Institute of Zhejiang University, 310058, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Key Laboratory of Motor System Disease Research and Precision Therapy of Zhejiang Province, 315825, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Clinical Research Center of Motor System Disease of Zhejiang Province, 315825, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Dr. Li Dak Sum and Yip Yio Chin Center for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Zhejiang University, 310058, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Binjiang Institute of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Zi Yin
- Orthopedics Research Institute of Zhejiang University, 310058, Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province, China
- Sports Medicine Institute of Zhejiang University, 310058, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Dr. Li Dak Sum and Yip Yio Chin Center for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Zhejiang University, 310058, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Jiayun Huang
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, 310058, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Orthopedics Research Institute of Zhejiang University, 310058, Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province, China
- Sports Medicine Institute of Zhejiang University, 310058, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Key Laboratory of Motor System Disease Research and Precision Therapy of Zhejiang Province, 315825, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Clinical Research Center of Motor System Disease of Zhejiang Province, 315825, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Dr. Li Dak Sum and Yip Yio Chin Center for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Zhejiang University, 310058, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Dengfeng Ruan
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, 310058, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Orthopedics Research Institute of Zhejiang University, 310058, Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province, China
- Sports Medicine Institute of Zhejiang University, 310058, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Key Laboratory of Motor System Disease Research and Precision Therapy of Zhejiang Province, 315825, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Clinical Research Center of Motor System Disease of Zhejiang Province, 315825, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Dr. Li Dak Sum and Yip Yio Chin Center for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Zhejiang University, 310058, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Yang Fei
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, 310058, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Orthopedics Research Institute of Zhejiang University, 310058, Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province, China
- Sports Medicine Institute of Zhejiang University, 310058, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Key Laboratory of Motor System Disease Research and Precision Therapy of Zhejiang Province, 315825, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Clinical Research Center of Motor System Disease of Zhejiang Province, 315825, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Dr. Li Dak Sum and Yip Yio Chin Center for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Zhejiang University, 310058, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Canlong Wang
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, 310058, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Orthopedics Research Institute of Zhejiang University, 310058, Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province, China
- Sports Medicine Institute of Zhejiang University, 310058, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Key Laboratory of Motor System Disease Research and Precision Therapy of Zhejiang Province, 315825, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Clinical Research Center of Motor System Disease of Zhejiang Province, 315825, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Dr. Li Dak Sum and Yip Yio Chin Center for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Zhejiang University, 310058, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Xianan Mo
- Dr. Li Dak Sum and Yip Yio Chin Center for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Zhejiang University, 310058, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Jiajin Li
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, 310058, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Orthopedics Research Institute of Zhejiang University, 310058, Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Jun Zhang
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, 310058, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Orthopedics Research Institute of Zhejiang University, 310058, Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province, China
- Sports Medicine Institute of Zhejiang University, 310058, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Key Laboratory of Motor System Disease Research and Precision Therapy of Zhejiang Province, 315825, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Clinical Research Center of Motor System Disease of Zhejiang Province, 315825, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Department of Orthopedics, Longquan People's Hospital, Zhejiang, 323799, China
| | - Cailian Fang
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, 310058, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Orthopedics Research Institute of Zhejiang University, 310058, Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province, China
- Sports Medicine Institute of Zhejiang University, 310058, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Key Laboratory of Motor System Disease Research and Precision Therapy of Zhejiang Province, 315825, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Clinical Research Center of Motor System Disease of Zhejiang Province, 315825, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Jianyou Li
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, 310058, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Department of Orthopedics, Huzhou Central Hospital, Affiliated Central Hospital of Huzhou University, Zhejiang University Huzhou Hospital, 313000, Huzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Xiao Chen
- Orthopedics Research Institute of Zhejiang University, 310058, Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province, China
- Sports Medicine Institute of Zhejiang University, 310058, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Dr. Li Dak Sum and Yip Yio Chin Center for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Zhejiang University, 310058, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Weiliang Shen
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, 310058, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Orthopedics Research Institute of Zhejiang University, 310058, Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province, China
- Sports Medicine Institute of Zhejiang University, 310058, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Key Laboratory of Motor System Disease Research and Precision Therapy of Zhejiang Province, 315825, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Clinical Research Center of Motor System Disease of Zhejiang Province, 315825, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Dr. Li Dak Sum and Yip Yio Chin Center for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Zhejiang University, 310058, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| |
Collapse
|