1
|
Jamieson F, Rasmussen-Barr E. How do information and physiotherapy affect health-related quality of life among patients with spinal stenosis undergoing decompression surgery: A qualitative study. Musculoskelet Sci Pract 2024; 72:103124. [PMID: 38901062 DOI: 10.1016/j.msksp.2024.103124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2024] [Revised: 06/14/2024] [Accepted: 06/15/2024] [Indexed: 06/22/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a lack of qualitative research on how patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) undergoing surgery perceive their health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Research that increases our understanding in this area could facilitate a biopsychosocial approach to care. AIM We aimed to investigate the experiences of patients with LSS undergoing decompression surgery regarding their pre- and post-surgery perceptions of HRQOL and the pre-and post-operative information and physiotherapy. METHOD We used a qualitative design with semi-structured interviews to perform content analysis using an inductive approach. Twelve patients (7 female, 5 male) were included post-surgery and interviewed by phone. The interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. RESULTS Four distinct categories with nine associated subcategories were identified: Patients' feelings of safety and empowerment are enhanced by healthcare professionals; Divided perceptions of information and physiotherapy in a group context; Health-related quality of life is associated with patients' perceived physical capacity; Patients' optimism and concerns influence health-related quality of life. CONCLUSION Both physical and psychological factors pre- and post-surgery appear to influence patients' HRQOL. Inherent optimism and feelings of empowerment in the care process appear to be important factors, regardless of physical health status. A strong patient-provider relationship is important to promote self-efficacy, which may positively affect perceived HRQOL and is in line with the generally recommended biopsychosocial approach in the treatment of people with low back pain. As qualitative studies in this area are scarce, there is a need for further studies to validate our findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fiona Jamieson
- Karolinska Institutet, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Physiotherapy, Alfred Nobels Allé 23, 141 83, Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Eva Rasmussen-Barr
- Karolinska Institutet, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Physiotherapy, Alfred Nobels Allé 23, 141 83, Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Plener J, Mior S, Atkinson-Graham M, Hogg-Johnson S, Côté P, Ammendolia C. It might take a village: developing a rehabilitation program of care for degenerative cervical radiculopathy from the patient perspective. Disabil Rehabil 2023:1-8. [PMID: 37735902 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2256653] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Accepted: 09/04/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of our study is to inform the development of a rehabilitation program of care from the perspectives of those suffering from degenerative cervical radiculopathy (DCR). MATERIAL AND METHODS We conducted a qualitative study, purposefully recruiting individuals with DCR. Transcripts from virtual semi-structured interviews were iteratively analyzed using interpretative phenomenological methods. RESULTS Eleven participants were recruited and depicted their ideal rehabilitation program of care. Participants described the importance of a patient centered-approach, health care providers who were validating, reassuring and attentive, easier access to health services, a supportive and collaborative team environment, and receiving peer support. Furthermore, participants expressed that they would expect the program of care to result in their symptoms being less intense and intermittent. In consideration of the participant perspectives, the ideal rehabilitation program of care can be conceptualized by the enactive-biopsychosocial model, which provides a theoretical framework for developing and implementing the program of care. CONCLUSION We obtained valuable information from individuals living with DCR regarding their preferences and expectations of a rehabilitation program of care. The participant descriptions will provide the groundwork for its development to meet patient needs and expectations. Future research to guide implementation will also be explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua Plener
- Division of Graduate Education, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Silvano Mior
- Department of Research and Innovation, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, Canada
- Institute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research, Oshawa, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Melissa Atkinson-Graham
- Department of Research and Innovation, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, Canada
| | - Sheilah Hogg-Johnson
- Department of Research and Innovation, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, Canada
- Institute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research, Oshawa, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Canada
- Division of Epidemiology, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Pierre Côté
- Institute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research, Oshawa, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Canada
- Division of Epidemiology, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Carlo Ammendolia
- Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Li LLC, Wong AYL, Kawchuk GN. An exploratory study to understand how people use Twitter to share experiences or information about spinal stenosis. Chiropr Man Therap 2022; 30:61. [PMID: 36578026 PMCID: PMC9797109 DOI: 10.1186/s12998-022-00465-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2022] [Accepted: 11/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Spinal stenosis is a narrowing of the spinal canal that may compress neurological tissues resulting in pain and disability. Although previous qualitative studies have solicited data regarding the life experience of patients with spinal stenosis or their opinions on relevant non-surgical treatments, their data was collected from participants in a controlled setting. Therefore, it remains unclear whether patients' or caregivers' concerns/opinions about spinal stenosis would be different in a non-experimental environment. Since Twitter is a popular online platform for people to share information and interact, it may reveal people's thoughts and attitudes about spinal stenosis. This study aimed to identify tweets that are related to spinal stenosis on Twitter, and to categorize them into common themes. METHODS A social media monitoring and analysis software program (TalkWalker) was used to search relevant tweets using the keywords 'spinal stenosis' and 'stenosis' between 29 May 2019 and 24 June 2020. Two independent reviewers screened and conducted content analysis of the tweets and classified the tweets into different themes. RESULTS Of 510 identified tweets, 362 tweets met the selection criteria. Five themes were identified: (1) compromised physical, psychological, and social wellbeing (n = 173); (2) diverse treatment options (n = 69); (3) coping strategies (n = 30); (4) dissemination of scientific information (n = 86); and (5) health policy (n = 4). Most of the tweets revealed negative impacts of spinal stenosis on patients' physical and psychosocial wellbeing. People with spinal stenosis shared their experiences and sought helps from others, while some people used Twitter to disseminate relevant information and research findings. CONCLUSIONS This is the first study exploring Twitter using an online analytical tool to identify themes related to spinal stenosis. The approach not only helps understand people's concerns about spinal stenosis in an uncontrolled environment, but also can be adopted to monitor influences of diseases or public health education on Twitter users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lillian L. C. Li
- grid.16890.360000 0004 1764 6123Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hong Kong SAR China
| | - Arnold Y. L. Wong
- grid.16890.360000 0004 1764 6123Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hong Kong SAR China
| | - Gregory N. Kawchuk
- grid.17089.370000 0001 2190 316XDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lam AK, Fung OH, Kwan C, Cheung JP, Luk KD, Chiu AY, Descarreaux M, Szeto GP, Wong AY. The Concerns and Experiences of Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Regarding Prehabilitation and Recovery After Spine Surgery: A Qualitative Study. Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl 2022; 4:100227. [PMID: 36545515 PMCID: PMC9761253 DOI: 10.1016/j.arrct.2022.100227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives To improve our understanding of patients' perspectives regarding: (1) the decision-making and prehabilitation before lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) surgery and (2) their postoperative experiences. Design Qualitative research with semi-structured interviews. Setting General community. Participants Individuals who received (N=10) and who did not receive (N=15) prehabilitation before LSS surgery were recruited at the 6-month postoperative follow-up (8 females; average age: 67.7±6.7 years) by purposive sampling. Additionally, 1 participant invited her daughter to accompany her in an interview. Interventions Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures Concerns and experiences of patients with LSS regarding prehabilitation and recovery after spine surgery. Results Thematic analysis was conducted to identify 4 themes inductively: (1) sources of information about LSS surgery; (2) factors affecting the surgical decision-making; (3) attitudes toward prehabilitation; and (4) postoperative recovery. All participants desired to have more preoperative education to inform their surgical decision-making. There were mixed opinions regarding the perceived benefits of prehabilitation because some individuals hesitated to participate in prehabilitation because of their symptoms, or the cost or time of traveling. Many participants expected some or even complete relief of LSS-related symptoms after surgery. However, not all participants experienced the expected postoperative improvements. Some participants only experienced temporary symptomatic relief, while others experienced new postoperative symptoms. Patients generally found that postoperative exercises taught by physiotherapists were useful although their compliance decreased over time. Conclusions Our study highlights the need for better preoperative LSS education. Because face-to-face prehabilitation or postoperative rehabilitation may not be feasible for all patients, future studies should explore whether online-based prehabilitation or postoperative rehabilitation may benefit certain patient subgroups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alan K.H. Lam
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China,Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Olivia H.Y. Fung
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Crystal Kwan
- Department of Applied Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Jason P.Y. Cheung
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Keith D.K. Luk
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Alice Y.Y. Chiu
- Department of Physiotherapy, Duchess of Kent Children's Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Martin Descarreaux
- Department of Human Kinetics, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, Canada
| | - Grace P.Y. Szeto
- School of Medical and Health Sciences, Tung Wah College, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Arnold Y.L. Wong
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China,Corresponding author Arnold Y.L. Wong, PhD, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hong Kong, SAR, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Which frailty scales for patients with adult spinal deformity are feasible and adequate? A systematic review. Spine J 2022; 22:1191-1204. [PMID: 35123046 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.01.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2021] [Revised: 01/19/2022] [Accepted: 01/27/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT Frailty as a concept is not yet fully understood, and is not the same as comorbidity. It is associated with an increased risk of adverse events and mortality after surgery, which makes its preoperative assessment significant. Despite its relevance, it still remains unclear which scales are appropriate for use in patients with spinal pathology. PURPOSE To evaluate the feasibility and measurement properties of frailty scales for spine patients, specifically with adult spinal deformity (ASD), and to propose adequate scales for primary triage to prevent surgery in too frail patients and for preoperative assessment to modify patients' condition and surgical plans. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING Systematic review. METHODS Systematic search was performed between 2010 and 2021 including terms relating to spinal disorders, frailty scales, and methodological quality. Characteristics of the studies and frailty scales and data describing relation to treatment outcomes were extracted. The risk of bias was determined with the QAREL score. RESULTS Of the 1993 references found, 88 original studies were included and 23 scales were identified. No prospective interventional study was found where the preoperative frailty assessment was implemented. Predictive value of scales for surgical outcomes varied, dependent on spinal disorders, type of surgeries, patients' age and frailty at baseline, and outcomes. Seventeen studies reported measurement properties of eight scales but these studies were not free of bias. In 30 ASD studies, ASD-Frailty Index (ASD-FI, n=14) and 11-item modified Frailty Index (mFI-11, n=11) were most frequently used. These scales were mainly studied in registry studies including young adult population, and carry a risk of sample bias and make their validity in elderly population unclear. ASD-FI covers multidisciplinary concepts of frailty with 40 items but its feasibility in clinical practice is questionable due to its length. The Risk Analysis Index, another multidisciplinary scale with 14 items, has been implemented for preoperative assessment in other surgical domains and was proven to be feasible and effective in interventional prospective studies. The FRAIL is a simple questionnaire with five items and its predictive value was confirmed in prospective cohort studies in which only elderly patients were included. CONCLUSIONS No adequate scale was identified in terms of methodological quality and feasibility for daily practice. Careful attention should be paid when choosing an adequate scale, which depends on the setting of interest (eg triage or preoperative work-up). We recommend to further study a simple and predictive scale such as FRAIL for primary triage and a comprehensive and feasible scale such as Risk Analysis Index for preoperative assessment for patients undergoing spine surgery, as their adequacy has been shown in other medical domains.
Collapse
|
6
|
Williamson E, Boniface G, Marian IR, Dutton SJ, Garrett A, Morris A, Hansen Z, Ward L, Nicolson PJA, Rogers D, Barker KL, Fairbank J, Fitch J, French DP, Comer C, Mallen CD, Lamb SE. The clinical effectiveness of a physiotherapy delivered physical and psychological group intervention for older adults with neurogenic claudication: the BOOST randomised controlled trial. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2022; 77:1654-1664. [PMID: 35279025 PMCID: PMC9373932 DOI: 10.1093/gerona/glac063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Neurogenic claudication (NC) is a debilitating spinal condition affecting older adults’ mobility and quality of life. Methods A randomized controlled trial of 438 participants evaluated the effectiveness of a physical and psychological group intervention (BOOST program) compared to physiotherapy assessment and tailored advice (best practice advice [BPA]) for older adults with NC. Participants were identified from spinal clinics (community and secondary care) and general practice records and randomized 2:1 to the BOOST program or BPA. The primary outcome was the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at 12 months. Data were also collected at 6 months. Other outcomes included ODI walking item, 6-minute walk test (6MWT), and falls. The primary analysis was intention-to-treat. Results The average age of participants was 74.9 years (standard deviation [SD] 6.0) and 57% (246/435) were female. There was no significant difference in ODI scores between treatment groups at 12 months (adjusted mean difference [MD]: −1.4 [95% confidence intervals (CI) −4.03, 1.17]), but, at 6 months, ODI scores favored the BOOST program (adjusted MD: −3.7 [95% CI −6.27, −1.06]). At 12 months, the BOOST program resulted in greater improvements in walking capacity (6MWT MD: 21.7m [95% CI 5.96, 37.38]) and ODI walking item (MD: −0.2 [95% CI −0.45, −0.01]) and reduced falls risk (odds ratio: 0.6 [95% CI 0.40, 0.98]) compared to BPA. No serious adverse events were related to either treatment. Conclusions The BOOST program substantially improved mobility for older adults with NC. Future iterations of the program will consider ways to improve long-term pain-related disability. Clinical Trials Registration Number: ISRCTN12698674
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esther Williamson
- Nuffield Department of Rheumatology, Orthopaedics and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, UK.,College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter
| | - Graham Boniface
- Nuffield Department of Rheumatology, Orthopaedics and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, UK
| | - Ioana R Marian
- Oxford Clinical Trials Research Unit, Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, UK
| | - Susan J Dutton
- Oxford Clinical Trials Research Unit, Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, UK
| | - Angela Garrett
- Nuffield Department of Rheumatology, Orthopaedics and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, UK
| | - Alana Morris
- Nuffield Department of Rheumatology, Orthopaedics and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, UK
| | - Zara Hansen
- Nuffield Department of Rheumatology, Orthopaedics and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, UK
| | - Lesley Ward
- Department of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Northumbria University, UK
| | - Philippa J A Nicolson
- Nuffield Department of Rheumatology, Orthopaedics and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, UK
| | - David Rogers
- Royal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Karen L Barker
- Nuffield Department of Rheumatology, Orthopaedics and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, UK.,Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Jeremy Fairbank
- Nuffield Department of Rheumatology, Orthopaedics and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, UK
| | | | - David P French
- Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, University of Manchester, UK
| | - Christine Comer
- University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.,Leeds Community Healthcare NHS Trust, Otley, UK
| | - Christian D Mallen
- Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Sarah E Lamb
- College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
McIlroy S, Jadhakhan F, Bell D, Rushton A. Prediction of walking ability following posterior decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN SPINE SOCIETY, THE EUROPEAN SPINAL DEFORMITY SOCIETY, AND THE EUROPEAN SECTION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE RESEARCH SOCIETY 2021; 30:3307-3318. [PMID: 34351524 PMCID: PMC8550110 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-021-06938-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2020] [Revised: 07/05/2021] [Accepted: 07/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Following surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) up to 40% of people report persistent walking disability. This study aimed to identify pre-operative factors that are predictive of walking ability post-surgery for LSS. METHODS An observational cohort study was conducted using data from the British Spine Registry (2017-2018) of adults (≥ 50 years) with LSS, who underwent ≤ 2 level posterior lumbar decompression. Patients receiving fixation or who had previous lumbar surgery were excluded. Walking ability was assessed by a single item on the Oswestry Disability Index and dichotomised into poor/good outcome. Multivariable regression models were performed. RESULTS 14,485 patients were identified. Pre-operatively 30% patients reported poor walking ability, this decreased to 8% at 12 months follow-up. Predictors associated with poor walking ability at 12 months were: increasing age (≥ 75 years OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.07, 2.18), BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2 (OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.00, 2.30), severity of leg pain (OR 1.10, CI 95% 1.01, 1.21), disability (OR 1.01, 95% CI 1.01, 1.02) and quality of life (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.56, 0.89). Pre-operative maximum walking distance (OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.05, 1.25) and higher education (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.80, 0.96) were associated with reduced risk of poor walking ability at 12 months; p < 0.05. Depression, fear of movement and symptom duration were not associated with risk of poor outcome. CONCLUSION Older age, obesity, greater pre-operative pain and disability and lower quality of life are associated with risk of poor walking ability post-operatively. Greater pre-operative walking and higher education are associated with reduced risk of poor walking ability post-operatively. Patients should be counselled on their risk of poor outcome and considered for rehabilitation so that walking and surgical outcomes may be optimised.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suzanne McIlroy
- Physiotherapy Department, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9RS, UK. .,School of Population Health & Environmental Sciences, King's College London, London, SE1 1UL, UK.
| | - Feroz Jadhakhan
- Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain [CPR Spine], School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - David Bell
- Neurosurgery Department, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9RS, UK
| | - Alison Rushton
- Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain [CPR Spine], School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.,School of Physical Therapy, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Nicol AL, Adams MCB, Gordon DB, Mirza S, Dickerson D, Mackey S, Edwards D, Hurley RW. AAAPT Diagnostic Criteria for Acute Low Back Pain with and Without Lower Extremity Pain. PAIN MEDICINE (MALDEN, MASS.) 2020; 21:2661-2675. [PMID: 32914195 PMCID: PMC8453619 DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnaa239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Low back pain is one of the most common reasons for which people visit their doctor. Between 12% and 15% of the US population seek care for spine pain each year, with associated costs exceeding $200 billion. Up to 80% of adults will experience acute low back pain at some point in their lives. This staggering prevalence supports the need for increased research to support tailored clinical care of low back pain. This work proposes a multidimensional conceptual taxonomy. METHODS A multidisciplinary task force of the ACTTION-APS-AAPM Pain Taxonomy (AAAPT) with clinical and research expertise performed a focused review and analysis, applying the AAAPT five-dimensional framework to acute low back pain. RESULTS Application of the AAAPT framework yielded the following: 1) Core Criteria: location, timing, and severity of acute low back pain were defined; 2) Common Features: character and expected trajectories were established in relevant subgroups, and common pain assessment tools were identified; 3) Modulating Factors: biological, psychological, and social factors that modulate interindividual variability were delineated; 4) Impact/Functional Consequences: domains of impact were outlined and defined; 5) Neurobiological Mechanisms: putative mechanisms were specified including nerve injury, inflammation, peripheral and central sensitization, and affective and social processing of acute low back pain. CONCLUSIONS The goal of applying the AAAPT taxonomy to acute low back pain is to improve its assessment through a defined evidence and consensus-driven structure. The criteria proposed will enable more rigorous meta-analyses and promote more generalizable studies of interindividual variation in acute low back pain and its potential underlying mechanisms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea L Nicol
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Meredith C B Adams
- Department of Anesthesiology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston Salem, North Carolina
| | - Debra B Gordon
- Department of Biobehavioral Nursing and Health Systems, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Sohail Mirza
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth University, Hanover, New Hampshire
| | - David Dickerson
- Department of Anesthesiology, NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, Illinois
| | - Sean Mackey
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - David Edwards
- Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Robert W Hurley
- Department of Anesthesiology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston Salem, North Carolina
- Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston Salm, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Markman JD, Czerniecka-Foxx K, Khalsa PS, Hayek SM, Asher AL, Loeser JD, Chou R. AAPT Diagnostic Criteria for Chronic Low Back Pain. THE JOURNAL OF PAIN 2020; 21:1138-1148. [PMID: 32036046 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2020.01.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2019] [Revised: 01/06/2020] [Accepted: 01/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Chronic low back pain (CLBP) conditions are highly prevalent and constitute the leading cause of disability worldwide. The Analgesic, Anesthetic, and Addiction Clinical Trial Translations Innovations Opportunities and Networks (ACTTION) public-private partnership with the US Food and Drug Administration and the American Pain Society (APS), have combined to create the ACTTION-APS Pain Taxonomy (AAPT). The AAPT initiative convened a working group to develop diagnostic criteria for CLBP. The working group identified 3 distinct low back pain conditions which result in a vast public health burden across the lifespan. This article focuses on: 1) the axial predominant syndrome of chronic musculoskeletal low back pain, 2) the lateralized, distally-radiating syndrome of chronic lumbosacral radicular pain 3) and neurogenic claudication associated with lumbar spinal stenosis. This classification of CLBP is organized according to the AAPT multidimensional framework, specifically 1) core diagnostic criteria; 2) common features; 3) common medical and psychiatric comorbidities; 4) neurobiological, psychosocial, and functional consequences; and 5) putative neurobiological and psychosocial mechanisms, risk factors, and protective factors. PERSPECTIVE: An evidence-based classification of CLBP conditions was constructed for the AAPT initiative. This multidimensional diagnostic framework includes: 1) core diagnostic criteria; 2) common features; 3) medical and psychiatric comorbidities; 4) neurobiological, psychosocial, and functional consequences; and 5) putative neurobiological and psychosocial mechanisms, risk factors, and protective factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John D Markman
- Translational Pain Research Program, Department of Neurosurgery, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York.
| | | | - Partap S Khalsa
- National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Salim Michel Hayek
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Case Western Reserve University, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Anthony L Asher
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Carolina Neurosurgery and Spine Associates and Neuroscience Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - John D Loeser
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Roger Chou
- Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Gonzalez AI, Schmucker C, Nothacker J, Motschall E, Nguyen TS, Brueckle MS, Blom J, van den Akker M, Röttger K, Wegwarth O, Hoffmann T, Straus SE, Gerlach FM, Meerpohl JJ, Muth C. Health-related preferences of older patients with multimorbidity: an evidence map. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e034485. [PMID: 31843855 PMCID: PMC6924802 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To systematically identify knowledge clusters and research gaps in the health-related preferences of older patients with multimorbidity by mapping current evidence. DESIGN Evidence map (systematic review variant). DATA SOURCES MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, PSYNDEX, CINAHL and Science Citation Index/Social Science Citation Index/-Expanded from inception to April 2018. STUDY SELECTION Studies reporting primary research on health-related preferences of older patients (mean age ≥60 years) with multimorbidity (≥2 chronic/acute conditions). DATA EXTRACTION Two independent reviewers assessed studies for eligibility, extracted data and clustered the studies using MAXQDA-18 content analysis software. RESULTS The 152 included studies (62% from North America, 28% from Europe) comprised 57 093 patients overall (range 9-9105). All used an observational design except for one interventional study: 63 (41%) were qualitative (59 cross-sectional, 4 longitudinal), 85 (57%) quantitative (63 cross-sectional, 22 longitudinal) and 3 (2%) used mixed methods. The setting was specialised care in 85 (56%) and primary care in 54 (36%) studies. We identified seven clusters of studies on preferences: end-of-life care (n=51, 34%), self-management (n=34, 22%), treatment (n=32, 21%), involvement in shared decision making (n=25, 17%), health outcome prioritisation/goal setting (n=19, 13%), healthcare service (n=12, 8%) and screening/diagnostic testing (n=1, 1%). Terminology (eg, preferences, views and perspectives) and concepts (eg, trade-offs, decision regret, goal setting) used to describe health-related preferences varied substantially between studies. CONCLUSION Our study provides the first evidence map on the preferences of older patients with multimorbidity. Included studies were mostly conducted in developed countries and covered a broad range of issues. Evidence on patient preferences concerning decision-making on screening and diagnostic testing was scarce. Differences in employed terminology, decision-making components and concepts, as well as the sparsity of intervention studies, are challenges for future research into evidence-based decision support seeking to elicit the preferences of older patients with multimorbidity and help them construct preferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER Open Science Framework (OSF): DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/MCRWQ.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Isabel Gonzalez
- Institute of General Practice, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Hessen, Germany
- Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas, Madrid, Spain
| | - Christine Schmucker
- Institute for Evidence in Medicine (for Cochrane Germany Foundation), Medical Center, University of Freiburg Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - Julia Nothacker
- Institute for Evidence in Medicine (for Cochrane Germany Foundation), Medical Center, University of Freiburg Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - Edith Motschall
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, University of Freiburg Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - Truc Sophia Nguyen
- Institute of General Practice, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Hessen, Germany
| | - Maria-Sophie Brueckle
- Institute of General Practice, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Hessen, Germany
| | - Jeanet Blom
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands
| | - Marjan van den Akker
- Institute of General Practice, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Hessen, Germany
- Department of Family Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
| | - Kristian Röttger
- Patient Representative, Federal Joint Committee, Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss, Berlin, Germany
| | - Odette Wegwarth
- Center for Adaptative Rationality, Max-Planck-Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany
| | - Tammy Hoffmann
- Institute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Bond University Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Sharon E Straus
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ferdinand M Gerlach
- Institute of General Practice, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Hessen, Germany
| | - Joerg J Meerpohl
- Institute for Evidence in Medicine (for Cochrane Germany Foundation), Medical Center, University of Freiburg Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - Christiane Muth
- Institute of General Practice, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Hessen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ward L, Williamson E, Hansen Z, French DP, Boniface G, Rogers D, Lamb SE. Development and delivery of the BOOST (Better Outcomes for Older adults with Spinal Trouble) intervention for older adults with neurogenic claudication. Physiotherapy 2019; 105:262-274. [PMID: 30935673 DOI: 10.1016/j.physio.2019.01.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2018] [Accepted: 01/29/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Neurogenic claudication due to spinal stenosis is a common cause of disability in older adults. Conservative treatments are a favourable treatment option. This paper describes the development and delivery of the BOOST (Better Outcomes for Older adults with Spinal Trouble) intervention, a physiotherapist-delivered physical and psychological intervention for the management of neurogenic claudication in older adults. The BOOST intervention is being tested in a multi-centre, randomised controlled trial in UK National Health Service Trusts; delivered by physiotherapists registered with the Health and Care Professionals Council. Participants are aged 65 years or older, registered with a primary care practice, and report symptoms consistent with neurogenic claudication. Intervention content and delivery was initially informed by clinical and patient experts, research evidence, and behaviour change guidelines; and refined following an intervention development day attended by researchers, health professionals, and Patient and Public Involvement representatives. The BOOST intervention comprises 12 group sessions, promoting sustained adherence with a long term home and physical activity programme. Each session includes education and group discussion, individually tailored exercises, and walking. Initial exercise levels are set at a one-to-one assessment. Continued home exercise adherence and increased physical activity following completion of the sessions is facilitated through support telephone calls. Trial registration ISRCTN12698674.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lesley Ward
- Nuffield Department of Rheumatology, Orthopaedics and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Botnar Research Centre, Windmill Road, Oxford OX3 7LD, UK.
| | - Esther Williamson
- Nuffield Department of Rheumatology, Orthopaedics and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Botnar Research Centre, Windmill Road, Oxford OX3 7LD, UK.
| | - Zara Hansen
- Nuffield Department of Rheumatology, Orthopaedics and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Botnar Research Centre, Windmill Road, Oxford OX3 7LD, UK.
| | - David P French
- Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Coupland 1 Building, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
| | - Graham Boniface
- Nuffield Department of Rheumatology, Orthopaedics and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Botnar Research Centre, Windmill Road, Oxford OX3 7LD, UK.
| | - David Rogers
- Centre for Musculoskeletal Medicine, Royal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Birmingham, Bristol Road South, Birmingham B31 2AP, UK.
| | - Sarah E Lamb
- Nuffield Department of Rheumatology, Orthopaedics and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Botnar Research Centre, Windmill Road, Oxford OX3 7LD, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hoffman H, Bennett SS, Li CH, Haakana P, Lu DC. Minimally Invasive Decompression and Physiotherapy for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis in Geriatric Patients. Cureus 2018; 10:e2785. [PMID: 30112261 PMCID: PMC6089476 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.2785] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is the most common indication for spine surgery among the geriatric population. Although decompressive surgery is effective, older patients do not benefit as much as younger patients, and they are frequently excluded from studies assessing postoperative physiotherapy. We sought to evaluate the long-term outcomes after surgery when a novel postoperative physiotherapy regimen was included. Methods We performed a retrospective review of patients with LSS greater than 70 years old who underwent lumbar decompressive surgery by the senior author over the past five years. We evaluated patients who participated in a novel postoperative physiotherapy regimen involving four phases of rehabilitation aimed at progressively independent ambulation. The visual analog scale (VAS), lower extremity motor strength, and functional independence measure (FIM) were collected preoperatively and after physiotherapy to measure outcomes. Results Ten consecutive patients with an average age of 83 years (range: 71 - 96) met the inclusion criteria. Nine patients underwent minimally invasive laminotomies at L4-L5 and one underwent a laminotomy at L3-L4. The average follow-up time was 41.9 months. The preoperative mean VAS was 7.35, and at the end of the study, it was 1.7 (p = 0.005). Three of the four patients with preoperative motor deficits improved. The median transfer and locomotion subscores of the FIM were six preoperatively and increased to seven postoperatively. Neither of these improvements was significant. Conclusions Patients older than 70 years undergoing decompressive surgery and a novel postoperative physiotherapy regimen experienced significant reductions in pain. Independence also increased; however, this did not reach statistical significance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haydn Hoffman
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California Los Angeles
| | - Shelley S Bennett
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of California, Los Angeles
| | - Charles H Li
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, Los Angeles
| | - Piia Haakana
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California Los Angeles
| | - Daniel C Lu
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California Los Angeles
| |
Collapse
|