Profiles of functioning of children with cerebral palsy in Finland: analysis of multi-professional family meetings

Experiences of implementation of the group-based adaptation training intervention for patients with chronic somatic illnesses or disabilities among multi-professional teams in specialized healthcare

OBJECTIVE

To describe the experiences of multi-professional teams of implementation of group-based adaptation training intervention for patients with chronic somatic illnesses or disabilities in specialized healthcare.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Multi-professional teams (n = 7) implementing adaptation training courses for chronically ill patients in specialised healthcare were interviewed between 09/2020 and 12/2021. The themes for thematic group interviews were based on the standard protocol implementation of adaptation training in specialised healthcare, including planning, implementation and evaluation of the adaptation training courses. The interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed. The data were analysed using inductive content analysis.

RESULTS

The experiences of multi-professional teams involved using pedagogical methods, providing guidance and counselling to support the rehabilitation process, ensuring opportunities for peer support, and supporting the course participants' involvement and activities in everyday life.

CONCLUSIONS

Healthcare professionals should use pedagogical methods in reflective guidance and counselling to promote client-oriented approach in supporting adaptation. Their competence in pedagogy needs to be build and maintained by continuous education. Multi-professional teams need to ensure sufficient and versatile conditions for peer support and involvement of family members by creating open and trusting atmosphere, unhurried encounters, discussions, different and varying ways of working. Adaptation training can strengthen the self-efficacy of participants and help them shift their attention from illness and disability to thoughts of the future. Adaptation training can support active and meaningful daily life in a changed life situation.

ICF Core Sets for the assessment of functioning of adults with cerebral palsy

AIM

To report on the results of the online international consensus process to develop the comprehensive and brief International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) Core Sets for adults with cerebral palsy (CP).

METHOD

An online iterative decision-making and consensus process involved 25 experts, including clinicians and researchers working with adults with CP, an adult with CP, and the parents of adults with CP from all six regions of the World Health Organization. The most relevant categories were selected from a list of 154 unique second-level candidate categories to develop the ICF Core Sets for adults with CP. This list resulted from evidence gathered during four preparatory studies, that is, a systematic literature review, a qualitative study, an expert survey, and an empirical study.

RESULTS

The consensus process resulted in the comprehensive ICF Core Set containing 120 second-level ICF categories: 33 body functions; eight body structures; 50 activities and participation; and 29 environmental factors, from which the most essential categories, 33 in total, were selected for the brief ICF Core Set. For body functions, most of the categories were mental functions and neuromusculoskeletal and movement-related functions. Body structures were mostly related to movement. All the chapters of the activities and participation component were represented, with mobility and self-care as the most frequently covered chapters. For environmental factors, most of the categories addressed products and technology and services, systems, and policies.

INTERPRETATION

The comprehensive and brief ICF Core Sets for adults with CP were created using a new online version of an established ICF Core Set consensus process. These Core Sets complement the age-specific ICF Core Sets for children and young people with CP and will promote standardized data collection worldwide.

Co-development of the CMAP Book: a tool to enhance children's participation in pediatric rehabilitation

PURPOSE

The purpose of the co-development project was to create a tool that enhances children's active participation and agency in rehabilitation and in everyday life.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Action research was the methodological approach. Participants in the different phases of the process (2015-2017) were children with disabilities, parents and rehabilitation professionals. The co-development process included: (1) designing the tool's first version, (2) piloting the tool, (3) evaluating the tool by collecting feedback and reflection, (4) generating the tool's final version.

RESULTS

Through the co-development process, an accommodating and digital tool called the CMAP Book-a description of the child's meaningful activities and participation-was developed. The CMAP Book is used with an electronic app enabling the identification and description of what is meaningful in daily life from the child's perspective with videos, photos, pictures, recording and writing. The tool enables the child, family and professionals to prepare and build collaboration in rehabilitation with flexibility according to child and family needs.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of the CMAP Book promotes the active involvement of the child and parents in designing the rehabilitation process in daily life in partnership with professionals. The stakeholder involvement in the co-development facilitated meaningful results and a concrete tool for rehabilitation.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONThe CMAP book is a new tool that enhances the child's active participation and agency in the rehabilitation process based on meaningful activities in everyday life expressed by the child.Identifying and utilising meaningful issues in the child's daily life through collaboration increases the child's commitment and motivation, and thus may enhance the benefits and effects of rehabilitation. Through co-development, the child and his/her family can be active and equal partners not only in development projects but also in the rehabilitation process.In the future, child-specific practices and policies should be developed to promote participatory co-research between families and clinicians linked to the daily lives of families with children.