Rehabilitation in practice: improving delivery of upper limb rehabilitation for children and young people with acquired brain injuries through the development and implementation of a clinical pathway

The Use of Quality Improvement in the Physical Therapy Literature: A Scoping Review

INTRODUCTION

Quality improvement (QI) is a useful methodology for improving healthcare, often through iterative changes. There is no prior review on the application of QI in physical therapy (PT).

PURPOSE AND RELEVANCE

To characterize and evaluate the quality of the QI literature in PT.

METHODS

We searched four electronic databases from inception through September 1, 2022. Included publications focused on QI and included the practice of PT. Quality was assessed using the 16-point QI Minimum Quality Criteria Set (QI-MQCS) appraisal tool.

RESULTS

Seventy studies were included in the review, 60 of which were published since 2014 with most ( n = 47) from the United States. Acute care ( n = 41) was the most prevalent practice setting. Twenty-two studies (31%) did not use QI models or approaches and only nine studies referenced Revised Standards for QI Reporting Excellence guidelines. The median QI-MQCS score was 12 (range 7-15).

CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS

Quality improvement publications in the PT literature are increasing, yet there is a paucity of QI studies pertaining to most practice settings and a lack of rigor in project design and reporting. Many studies were of low-to-moderate quality and did not meet minimum reporting standards. We recommend use of models, frameworks, and reporting guidelines to improve methodologic rigor and reporting.

Quo Vadis, Amadeo Hand Robot? A Randomized Study with a Hand Recovery Predictive Model in Subacute Stroke

BACKGROUND

Early identification of hand-prognosis-factors at patient's admission could help to select optimal synergistic rehabilitation programs based on conventional (COHT) or robot-assisted (RAT) therapies.

METHODS

In this bi-phase cross-over prospective study, 58 stroke patients were enrolled in two randomized groups. Both groups received same treatments A + B (A = 36 COHT sessions for 10 weeks; B = 36 RAT sessions for 10 weeks; 45 min/session; 3 to 5 times per week). Outcome repeated measures by blinded assessors included FMUL, BBT, NHPT, Amadeo Robot (AHR) and AMPS. Statistical comparisons by Pearson's rank correlations and one-way analyses of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni posthoc tests, with size effects and statistic power, were reported. Multiple backward linear regression models were used to predict the variability of sensorimotor and functional outcomes.

RESULTS

Isolated COHT or RAT treatments improved hand function at 3 months. While "higher hand paresis at admission" affected to sensorimotor and functional outcomes, "laterality of injury" did not seem to affect the recovery of the hand. Kinetic-kinematic parameters of robot allowed creating a predictive model of hand recovery at 3 and 6 months from 1st session.

CONCLUSIONS

Hand impairment is an important factor in define sensorimotor and functional outcomes, but not lesion laterality, to predict hand recovery.

Decision-making aids for upper limb interventions in neurological rehabilitation: a scoping review

PURPOSE

To summarise the range and nature of decision-making aids that guide upper limb (UL) neurorehabilitation.

METHODS

Our scoping review followed Arksey and O'Malley's 6-step framework. Electronic databases were systematically searched; grey literature was hand-searched. Included papers were: (1) published in English; (2) related to UL rehabilitation for people with upper motor neuron conditions; and (3) provided a description of, or research on, a decision-making aid that guides therapists when choosing between two or more intervention approaches, techniques, or applications of a technique. Levels of evidence were rated. An expert panel of occupational therapists working in UL neurorehabilitation was consulted.

RESULTS

The 24 included articles described 15 decision-making aids with varying breadth and depth of the assessment process and suggested interventions. Six aids had published research, but lacked high quality evidence. The expert panel identified four key decision-making aids as being clinically useful. Preferred aids either included client-centred goal-setting within a holistic assessment or matched specific intervention options to distinct UL assessment results. Prompts to re-evaluate client performance are desirable.

CONCLUSION

Few decision-making aids guide therapists to holistically assess and make specific intervention decisions across all domains of UL neurorehabilitation. Their usefulness depends on the purpose, setting, and therapist experience.Implications for rehabilitationConsidering the complexity and heterogeneity of upper limb (UL) neurorehabilitation, a selection of evidence-based and purpose-designed decision-making aids may assist therapists across different experience levels and practice settings to choose individualised interventions.Decision-making aids for UL interventions in neurorehabilitation may be more clinically useful if they include a holistic and client-centred information gathering process that focuses on daily life goals.Decision-making aids should illustrate a clear clinical picture based on UL assessment results, with corresponding UL intervention recommendations provided.Inclusion of a cyclic process to re-evaluate client performance and function could also enhance the usefulness of a decision-making aid.