1
|
Bourgeois N, Lands LC, Prévost K, Poirier C, Janaudis-Ferreira T. Virtual Physical Prehabilitation in Lung Transplant Candidates: A Proof-of-Concept Study. Transpl Int 2024; 37:12355. [PMID: 38433973 PMCID: PMC10904465 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2024.12355] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2023] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024]
Abstract
This study aimed to preliminary test the effectiveness of 12-week virtual physical prehabilitation program followed by a maintenance phase. The main objective was to estimate the extent to which it affects exercise capacity, frailty, lower limb strength and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in lung transplant candidates. The program offered supervised strengthening exercises, independent aerobic exercises and weekly phone calls (maintenance phase). Primary outcome was the six-minute walk distance (6MWD). Secondary outcomes: the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), five-times sit-to-stand test (5STS), the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) for HRQOL. Twenty patients were included (mean age 57.9; 6 women/14 men); fourteen completed the prehabilitation program and 5 completed the maintenance phase. There was no statistically significant improvement in 6MWD, SPPB or SGRQ after the 12-week program. Most patients either maintained or improved the 6MWT and SPPB scores. There was a significant improvement in the 5STS. After the maintenance phase, most patients either improved or maintained their scores in all outcomes except for the sub-score of symptoms in the SGRQ. A 12-week virtual physical prehabilitation program with a 12-week maintenance phase can help lung transplant candidates improve or maintain their physical function while waiting for transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas Bourgeois
- Lung Transplant Program, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
- School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Canadian Donation and Transplantation Research Program, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Larry C. Lands
- Lung Transplant Program, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, Montreal Children’s Hospital-McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Karina Prévost
- Lung Transplant Program, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Charles Poirier
- Lung Transplant Program, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Tania Janaudis-Ferreira
- School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Canadian Donation and Transplantation Research Program, Edmonton, AB, Canada
- Respiratory Epidemiology and Clinical Research Unit, Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rotenberg S, Oreper JS, Bar Y, Davids-Brumer N, Dawson DR. "It's better than nothing, but I do not find it to be ideal": Older adults' experience of TeleRehab during the first COVID-19 lockdown. J Appl Gerontol 2022; 42:811-820. [PMID: 36471551 PMCID: PMC9729721 DOI: 10.1177/07334648221144022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
This qualitative study used descriptive thematic analysis to explore the experiences of 16 older adults (age: 71 ± 6.4) who transitioned from an in-person to telerehabilitation (TeleRehab) group intervention in March 2020. We found the following themes: (1A) Technology Use, describing challenges and need for support; and (1B) Technology Self-Efficacy, describing how technological ability was attributed to past-experience and/or age. Four themes described the intervention experience. First, "Not The Same, But Better Than Nothing" (2A), reflected a preference for in-person intervention. Specifically, in-person training provided a better social experience (theme 2B), and stronger accountability, although the content was well delivered in both modalities (theme 2C). Contextual factors (theme 2D) that played a role were ease of commute, especially important during the winter, and the context of the lockdown, that positioned the TeleRehab intervention as a meaningful social activity. However, sensory impairments, and/or distractions in the home diminished the TeleRehab experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shlomit Rotenberg
- Department of Occupational Science & Occupational Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada,Rotman Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada,Shlomit Rotenberg, Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Toronto Temerty Faculty of Medicine, 160 - 500 University Ave, Toronto, ON M6A 2E1, Canada.
| | - Julie S. Oreper
- Department of Occupational Science & Occupational Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Yael Bar
- Rotman Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Naomi Davids-Brumer
- Department of Occupational Science & Occupational Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Deirdre R. Dawson
- Department of Occupational Science & Occupational Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada,Rotman Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada,Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|