Monitoring of low molecular weight heparin in pregnancy

Efficacy and safety of nadroparin in the treatment of pregnant women with antiphospholipid syndrome: a prospective cohort study

The optimal therapeutic management of patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) during pregnancy is debatable. In the present prospective cohort study the use of a low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) (nadroparin), administered alone twice daily in 30 pregnant women who were diagnosed with APS on the basis of the current classification criteria, is evaluated. Dosage was adjusted according to anti-Xa levels in the patients as the pregnancies progressed. Three women, in whom an important gradual fall in platelet count in the first trimester did not respond to increased nadroparin doses, were shifted to a second-line treatment protocol. Fetal loss occurred in two of the 27 remaining women (7.40%), while 25 (92.59%) delivered 25 live infants, between the 32nd and 40th weeks of gestation. No fetal problems were registered during pregnancies, while maternal complications occurred in two of the 25 patients (8%). Moreover, there were no thrombotic events in any of the women during the study. Patient compliance was good and only minor side-effects were reported. The results of this study indicate that nadroparin alone is useful and safe in the management of pregnant patients with APS. However, in consideration of the good pregnancy outcome obtained in patients with only pregnancy morbidity when heparin and aspirin were used together, other studies comparing nadroparin twice daily with once daily plus Aspirin would be useful to ascertain which is more effective in these patients.

Low-molecular-weight heparin for the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism in pregnancy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) have largely replaced unfractionated heparins for both prophylaxis and treatment of venous thromboembolism in nonpregnant patients. However, until recently, evidence in pregnant women was lacking, despite the increasing use of LMWHs during pregnancy in clinical practice. This review covers recent literature on the use of LMWHs in relation to pregnancy.

RECENT FINDINGS

The main areas covered in this review are the use of LMWHs in both prophylaxis and treatment of venous thromboembolism in pregnancy. The review also considers issues relating to monitoring of LMWHs in pregnancy, and safety from both a maternal and a fetal perspective.

SUMMARY

The available evidence demonstrates that LMWHs are of at least equivalent efficacy but have a better safety profile compared with unfractionated heparins in both prophylaxis and treatment of maternal venous thromboembolism, and are more convenient to administer. There is no consensus with respect to whether these agents require monitoring during pregnancy other than periodic checking of the platelet count. The clinical implication from the available evidence is that LMWHs should now be regarded as the anticoagulant agents of choice for both prophylaxis and treatment of maternal venous thromboembolism.