Multidrug resistance 1 (MDR1/ABCB1) gene polymorphism (rs1045642 C > T) and susceptibility to multiple myeloma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The Relationship of ABCB1/MDR1 and CYP1A1 Variants with the Risk of Disease Development and Shortening of Overall Survival in Patients with Multiple Myeloma

(1) Background: The aim of our study was to analyze the possible relationship of ABCB1 and CYP1A1 gene variants with susceptibility and outcome of multiple myeloma (MM); (2) Methods: Genomic DNA samples from 110 newly-diagnosed MM patients and 100 healthy blood donors were analyzed by methods-PCR-RFLP (for ABCB1 3435C > T, CYP1A1 6235T > C-m1), automated DNA sequencing (for ABCB1 1236C > T, 2677G > T/A) and allele-specific PCR (for CYP1A1 4889A > G-m2); (3) Results: The genotypic frequencies of CYP1A1 4889A > G variant were not in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium for MM patients. The presence of m1 and m2 CYP1A1 alleles decreased the risk of MM-OR = 0.49 (p = 0.011) and OR = 0.27 (p = 0.0003), respectively. In turn, TT genotype (ABCB1 2677G > T/A) increased the risk of this disease (p = 0.007). In the multivariate Cox analysis CT + TT genotypes (ABCB1 3435C > T) were associated with decreased risk of death (HR = 0.29, p = 0.04). In log-rank test in patients with CT genotype (ABCB1 3435C > T) was observed association of overall survival with the type of treatment; (4) Conclusions: Our findings suggest that T-alleles of ABCB1 2677G > T/A and m1/m2 alleles of CYP1A1 affected the susceptibility of MM. Moreover, T-allele of ABCB1 3435C > T might be independent positive prognostic factor in MM.

A SNP involved in alternative splicing of ABCB1 is associated with clopidogrel resistance in coronary heart disease in Chinese population

Although many scientists are studying the association between genetic polymorphism of ABCB1 and CR in patients, the molecular mechanism has not been further studied in patients with CHD. This study investigated the relationship between SNP of the ABCB1 gene in patients with CHD and CR, and whether the polymorphism of the ABCB1 gene affects the AS of the gene. 741 patients were enrolled in the study, 316 CR cases and 425 NCR cases. The correlation between CR risk and clinical-pathological characteristics were studied. Additionally, the five SNPs were analysed by PCR and Mass Array genotyping methods. Furthermore, silicon analysis was used to predict whether the polymorphism affects the process of AS. Results showed that there was a significant correlation between rs1045642 polymorphism and CR in genotyping and allele analysis. The rs1045642 polymorphism of the ABCB1 gene of CHD patients carrying the A allele are more likely to develop CR. Silicon analysis showed that rs1045642 generated a new ESE sequence which might affect AS of ABCB1 gene. We hypothesize that the mechanism of CR might be caused by a change in the AS caused by the polymorphism of the gene. Thus, this work provides guidance for the clinical use of clopidogrel.

Impact of genetic variants of ABCB1, APOB, CAV1, and NAMPT on susceptibility to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in Chinese patients

BACKGROUND

Among the different types of cancer, pancreatic cancer, particularly pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), is the most lethal malignancy, with poor early detection rates and prognosis. The aim of the present study was to investigate the potential genetic effects of the single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in ABCB1 (rs1045642, rs3789243, rs4148737), APOB (rs693, rs1042031), CAV1 (rs12672038, rs1997623, rs3807987, rs7804372), and NAMPT (rs9034, rs2505568, rs61330082) on PDAC.

METHODS

A total of 273 patients with PDAC and 263 healthy controls were genotyped using PCR and direct Sanger sequencing. Unconditional logistic regression models were used to evaluate the potential effects of the genotypes, alleles, and haplotypes on the risk of developing PDAC.

RESULTS

Patients with PDAC possessed a considerably lower frequency of genotypes AG, GG, and allele G at ABCB1 rs4148737 compared with controls. Based on age, sex, smoking status, drinking status, diabetes, and family history of cancer, stratified analyses showed a significant correlation between SNPs at rs4148737 and PDAC. According to specific SNPs, eight haplotypes were constructed along with ABCB1 rs4148737, rs1045642, and rs3789243. Carriers with haplotypes ACC and ATC were more susceptible to developing PDAC, whereas haplotypes GCC and GTC were associated with a reduced likelihood of developing PDAC. The distributions of the other SNPs in each group were not significantly associated with PDAC risk.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggested that genetic polymorphisms of ABCB1 rs4148737 may influence an individual's risk of developing PDAC.

Genetic polymorphisms and multiple myeloma risk: a meta-analysis

Previous researches exploring associations between multiple myeloma (MM) and genetic polymorphisms showed controversial results. In this investigation, we aimed to make a meta-analysis to assess the association between MM risk and genetic polymorphisms. We searched for articles on genetic polymorphism and MM risk in Web of Science and PubMed databases from 1951 to August 2019. We computed the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) extracted from included articles. The meta-analysis showed no significant associations between MM risks and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α (rs1800629/rs361525/rs1799724), interleukin (IL)-6 (rs1800795), multidrug resistance 1 (MDR1) (rs1045642), Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) (rs1801131/rs1801133) polymorphisms. In summary, the study shows that the TNF-α (rs1800629/rs361525/rs1799724), IL-6 (rs1800795), MDR1 (rs1045642), and MTHFR (rs1801131/rs1801133) polymorphisms may not be associated with MM susceptibility. Thus, we do not need more expensive and useless studies to explore the associations between MM risks and these genetic polymorphisms.

Association between ABCB1 (3435C>T) polymorphism and susceptibility of colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis

Studies on the relationship between ABCB1 3435C>T polymorphism (rs1045642) and colorectal cancer (CRC)susceptibility have yielded inconclusive results. To clarify this issue, we undertook a meta-analysis to investigate the relationship between rs1045642 and CRC risk.Three electronic scientific publication databases (Cochrane Library, Pubmed, Embase) were screened using specific search terms. Relevant literature was identified using literature traceability methods. Selected publications were evaluated according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Effect size information (odds ratio and the corresponding 95% confidence interval [CI]) was obtained following quality assessment and data extraction from the included publications, and a meta-analysis conducted. Statistical analysis was performed with the Stata sofz (Version 13.0) software.Overall, 17 case-control studies involving 7129 CRC patients and 7710 healthy control subjects satisfied the criteria for inclusion in the meta-analysis. There was no significant association between ABCB1 3435C>T polymorphism and CRC risk in any of the genetic models. In the CC versus CT model (I = 20.9%, Pheterogeneity = .276), CC versus CT + TT model (I = 45.6%, Pheterogeneity = .102) and CT versus CC + TT model (I = 17.8%, Pheterogeneity = .298) analyses, between-study heterogeneities were detected as significant in Asian populations. In the CT versus TT model (I = 24%, Pheterogeneity = .254) and CC + CT versus TT model (I = 0, Pheterogeneity = .55), between-study heterogeneities were found to be significant in groups of different populations.The meta-analysis described here suggests that the ABCB1 3435C>T polymorphism is not related to CRC susceptibility.