The cortisol awakening response and the late positive potentials evoked by unpleasant emotional pictures in healthy adults

Positive and negative touch differentially modulate metacognitive memory judgements for emotional stimuli

Touch plays a crucial role in providing humans with information from the external environment and can be perceived by humans as positively or negatively valenced. It is well documented that touch can differentially influence social functions, but very little is known about how touch can modulate (meta)cognition. Utilizing a within-subject design, participants were exposed to (a) positive, (b) negative, and (c) no touch, alongside encoding of emotionally valenced (positive and negative) images. After a 20-minute delay, participants completed a Yes/No recognition task to investigate how touch influenced memory-related decision components (e.g. criterion, confidence). Results showed that, compared to the control condition, both positive and negative touch were associated with overall lower confidence ratings, a less liberal response bias and slower response times. Interestingly, for correct recognitions, only negative touch (vs. no touch) led to inappropriately lower confidence and slower response times while both confidence and response time remained unaltered in positive touch. Our findings provide the first evidence that positive and negative touch differentially interact with metacognitive memory-related decisions. Altered metacognitive judgements after being touched could have significant consequences in applied settings, such as situations of eyewitness testimony.

Cortisol in functional neurological disorders: State, trait and prognostic biomarkers

OBJECTIVE

Biological stress dysregulation, such as a flattened cortisol awakening response (CAR), has been identified in functional neurological disorder (FND). This longitudinal study aimed to explore whether CAR alterations in FND serve as state or trait biomarkers, assessing temporal changes in cortisol and clinical outcomes to test its prognostic value.

METHODS

Salivary cortisol was measured in 53 patients with mixed FND at two visits separated by eight months (M0 and M8). CAR was calculated based on five consecutive samples, each taken with 15-min time intervals, collected upon awakening, whereas cortisol amplitude (CAmp) was calculated as the difference between the morning peak and the afternoon trough. Clinical outcome was assessed with the Functional Movement Disorder Rating Scale (S-FMDRS), Clinical global impression (CGI) scores for severity (CGI-S) and improvement (CGI-I) and the short-form health survey (SF-36).

RESULTS

No differences in CAR levels were found between M0 and M8 regardless of clinical outcome (remained flattened). However, a good clinical outcome was associated with an earlier peak in the CAR (p = .013, odds ratio: 1.78; 95%-confidence interval: 0.095-1.13). A higher CAmp at M0 predicted a better outcome at M8 (β = 1.14, 95%-confidence interval:0.15-2.13, p = .03).

CONCLUSION

A flattened CAR might represent a trait marker for FND, when an earlier peak in the CAR may serve as a state biomarker. The CAmp demonstrates predictive power for clinical outcome, potentially representing a prognostic biomarker for FND. Further replication and follow-up studies are essential to confirm this suggested role of cortisol as a multifaceted biomarker of FND.

Do incidental positive emotions induce more optimistic expectations of decision outcomes? An empirical study from the perspective of event-related potential

INTRODUCTION

Previous research has found that incidental emotions of different valences (positive/negative/neutral) influence risky decision-making. However, the mechanism of their influence on psychological expectations of decision outcomes remains unclear.

METHODS

We explored the effects of different incidental emotions on the behavioral, psychological, and electrophysiological responses of individuals in risky decision-making through a money gambling task using a one-way (emotion type: positive, negative, neutral emotions) between-subjects experimental design.

RESULTS

Individuals with positive emotions had significantly greater risk-seeking rates than those with negative emotions during the decision selection phase (p < .01). In the feedback stage of decision outcomes, individuals showed stronger perceptions of uncertainty in the decision environment under gain and loss feedback compared with neutral feedback, as evidenced by a more positive P2 component (i.e., the second positive component of an event-related potential). Positive emotions produced greater than expected outcome bias than neutral emotions, as evidenced by a more negative FRN component (i.e., the feedback-related negativity component).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that positive emotions increase individuals' psychological expectations of decision outcomes. This study provides new empirical insights to understand the influence of incidental emotions on risky decision outcome expectations.